Project Job Ref.

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 132KV TRANSMISSION

Section Sheet no./rev.
CONVENANT UNIVERSITY OTTA
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 1
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

10/30/2019

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS (EN1997-1:2004)

In accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the recommended values
TEDDS calculation version 3.2.21

Pad foundation details

Length of foundation; Lx = 4500 mm; Width of foundation; Ly = 4500 mm
Depth of foundation; h = 600 mm; Depth of soil over foundation; hsoil = 600 mm
Level of water; hwater = 0 mm; Density of water; water = 9.8 kN/m3
Density of concrete; conc = 25.0 kN/m3

Column no.1 details

Length of column; lx1 = 450 mm; Width of column; ly1 = 450 mm
position in x-axis; x1 = 425 mm; position in y-axis; y1 = 425 mm
Column no.2 details
Length of column; lx2 = 450 mm; Width of column; ly2 = 450 mm
position in x-axis; x2 = 4075 mm; position in y-axis; y2 = 425 mm
Column no.3 details
Length of column; lx3 = 450 mm; Width of column; ly3 = 450 mm
position in x-axis; x3 = 425 mm; position in y-axis; y3 = 4075 mm
Column no.4 details
Length of column; lx4 = 450 mm; Width of column; ly4 = 450 mm
position in x-axis; x4 = 4075 mm; position in y-axis; y4 = 4075 mm
 Project Job Ref.

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 132KV TRANSMISSION

Section Sheet no./rev.
CONVENANT UNIVERSITY OTTA
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 2
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

10/30/2019

Soil properties
Density of soil; soil = 19.0 kN/m3; Characteristic cohesion; c'k = 0 kN/m2
Char.effect.shear resist.angle; 'k = 30 deg; Characteristic friction angle; k = 20 deg
Foundation loads
Variable surcharge load; FQsur = 10.0 kN/m2; Self weight; Fswt = 15.0 kN/m2
2
Soil weight; Fsoil = 11.4 kN/m

Column no.1 loads

Permanent load in x; FGx1 = -9.4 kN; Permanent load in y; FGy1 = 0.3 kN
Permanent load in z; FGz1 = -66.5 kN
Permanent moment in x; MGx1 = -0.8 kNm; Permanent moment in y; MGy1 = 0.0 kNm
Column no.2 loads
Permanent load in x; FGx2 = -29.3 kN; Permanent load in y; FGy2 = 26.5 kN
Permanent load in z; FGz2 = 310.9 kN
Permanent moment in x; MGx2 = 1.8 kNm; Permanent moment in y; MGy2 = 1.5 kNm
Column no.3 loads
Permanent load in x; FGx3 = -26.8 kN; Permanent load in y; FGy3 = 29.3 kN
Permanent load in z; FGz3 = -283.7 kN
Permanent moment in x; MGx3 = 1.2 kNm; Permanent moment in y; MGy3 = 1.2 kNm
Column no.4 loads
Permanent load in x; FGx4 = -13.5 kN; Permanent load in y; FGy4 = -9.3 kN
Permanent load in z; FGz4 = 123.8 kN
Permanent moment in x; MGx4 = -0.9 kNm; Permanent moment in y; MGy4 = 0.4 kNm
 Project Job Ref.

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 132KV TRANSMISSION

Section Sheet no./rev.
CONVENANT UNIVERSITY OTTA
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 3
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

10/30/2019

Design approach 1
Partial factors on actions - Combination1
Partial factor set; A1
Permanent action; G = 1.35; Variable action; Q = 1.50
Partial factors for soil parameters - Combination1
Soil factor set; M1
Angle of shearing resistance; ' = 1.00; Effective cohesion; c' = 1.00
Partial factors for spread foundations - Combination1
Resistance factor set; R1
Bearing; R.v = 1.00; Sliding; R.h = 1.00
Bearing resistance (Section 6.5.2)
Forces on foundation
Force in x-axis; Fdx = -106.7 kN; Force in y-axis; Fdy = 66.5 kN
Force in z-axis; Fdz = 1262.1 kN
Moments on foundation
Moment in x-axis; Mdx = 4486.2 kNm; Moment in y-axis; Mdy = 2026.6 kNm
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity in x-axis; ex = 1304 mm; Eccentricity in y-axis; ey = -644 mm
Effective area of base
Effective length; L'x = 1891 mm; Effective width; L'y = 3211 mm
Effective area; A' = 6.073 m2
Pad base pressure
Design base pressure; fdz = 207.8 kN/m2
Net ultimate bearing capacity under drained conditions (Annex D.4)
Net ultimate bearing capacity; nf = 688.5 kN/m2
PASS - Ultimate bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure
Sliding resistance (Section 6.5.3)
Forces on foundation
Force in x-axis; Fdx = -106.7 kN; Force in y-axis; Fdy = 66.5 kN
Force in z-axis; Fdz = 496.6 kN
Sliding resistance verification (Section 6.5.3)
Horizontal force on foundation; H = 125.7 kN; Sliding resistance; RH.d = 180.7 kN
H / RH.d = 0.695
PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by sliding
Library item: Check sliding summary

Design approach 1
Partial factors on actions - Combination2
Partial factor set; A2
Permanent action; G = 1.00; Variable action; Q = 1.30
 Project Job Ref.

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 132KV TRANSMISSION

Section Sheet no./rev.
CONVENANT UNIVERSITY OTTA
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 4
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

10/30/2019

Partial factors for soil parameters - Combination2

Soil factor set; M2
Angle of shearing resistance; ' = 1.25; Effective cohesion; c' = 1.25
Partial factors for spread foundations - Combination2
Resistance factor set; R1
Bearing; R.v = 1.00; Sliding; R.h = 1.00
Bearing resistance (Section 6.5.2)
Forces on foundation
Force in x-axis; Fdx = -79.0 kN; Force in y-axis; Fdy = 46.8 kN
Force in z-axis; Fdz = 882.4 kN
Moments on foundation
Moment in x-axis; Mdx = 3371.3 kNm; Moment in y-axis; Mdy = 1278.8 kNm
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity in x-axis; ex = 1571 mm; Eccentricity in y-axis; ey = -801 mm
Effective area of base
Effective length; L'x = 1359 mm; Effective width; L'y = 2899 mm
Effective area; A' = 3.938 m2
Pad base pressure
Design base pressure; fdz = 224.1 kN/m2
Net ultimate bearing capacity under drained conditions (Annex D.4)
Net ultimate bearing capacity; nf = 311.7 kN/m2
PASS - Ultimate bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure
Sliding resistance (Section 6.5.3)
Forces on foundation
Force in x-axis; Fdx = -79.0 kN; Force in y-axis; Fdy = 46.8 kN
Force in z-axis; Fdz = 619.1 kN
Sliding resistance verification (Section 6.5.3)
Horizontal force on foundation; H = 91.9 kN; Sliding resistance; RH.d = 180.3 kN
H / RH.d = 0.510
PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by sliding
Library item: Check sliding summary

Partial factors for uplift limit state - Table A.15

Permanent unfavourable action;G.dst = 1.00; Permanent favourable action; G.stb = 0.90
Variable favourable action; Q.dst = 1.50
Uplift limit state verification
Vertical force; Fdz.u = 522.2 kN
PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by uplift
 Project Job Ref.

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 132KV TRANSMISSION

Section Sheet no./rev.
CONVENANT UNIVERSITY OTTA
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 5
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

10/30/2019

FOUNDATION DESIGN (EN1992-1-1:2004)

In accordance with EN1992-1-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated January 2008 and the recommended values
TEDDS calculation version 3.2.21

Concrete details (Table 3.1 - Strength and deformation characteristics for concrete)
Concrete strength class; C20/25; Char.comp.cylinder strength; fck = 20 N/mm2
Partial factor for concrete; C = 1.50; Maximum aggregate size; hagg = 20 mm
Design compressive strength; fcd = 16.7 N/mm2; Design tensile strength, plain; fctd,pl = 1.0 N/mm2
Reinforcement details
Characteristic yield strength; fyk = 410 N/mm2; Partial factor for reinforcment; S = 1.15
2
Design yield strength; fyd = 357 N/mm ; Nominal cover; cnom = 50 mm
Shear diagram, x axis (kN)

Moment diagram, x axis (kNm)

488.7

-20.6
14.6

181.2

488.7

Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)

Design bending moment;
Tens.reinforcement required;
Tens.reinforcement provided;
Min.area of reinforcement;
Crack control (Section 7.3)
Limiting crack width;
Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)
Design bending moment;
Tens.reinforcement required;
Tens.reinforcement provided;
Min.area of reinforcement;
MEd.x.max = 488.7 kNm; K = 0.018; K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Asx.bot.req = 3419 mm2
23 No.16 dia.bars bottom (200 c/c); Asx.bot.prov = 4624 mm2
As.min = 3419 mm2; Max.area of reinforcement; As.max = 97560 mm2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
wmax = 0.3 mm; Maximum crack width; wk = 0.227 mm
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
abs(MEd.x.min) = 4.6 kNm; K = 0.000; K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Asx.top.req = 3419 mm2
23 No.16 dia.bars top (200 c/c); Asx.top.prov = 4624 mm2
As.min = 3419 mm2; Max.area of reinforcement; As.max = 97560 mm2

CONVENANT UNIVERSITY OTTA
Crack control (Section 7.3)
Limiting crack width;
Rectangular section in shear (Section 6.2)
Design shear force;
Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)
Design bending moment;
Tens.reinforcement required;
Tens.reinforcement provided;
Min.area of reinforcement;
Crack control (Section 7.3)
Limiting crack width;
Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)
Design bending moment;
Tens.reinforcement required;
Tens.reinforcement provided;
Min.area of reinforcement;
Crack control (Section 7.3)
Limiting crack width;
Project Job Ref.
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 132KV TRANSMISSION
Section Sheet no./rev.
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 6
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
10/30/2019
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
wmax = 0.3 mm; Maximum crack width; wk = 0.002 mm
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
abs(VEd.x.min) = 281.2 kN; Design shear resistance; VRd.c = 761.5 kN
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Shear diagram, y axis (kN)
Moment diagram, y axis (kNm)
MEd.y.max = 15 kNm; K = 0.001; K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Asy.bot.req = 3318 mm2
23 No.16 dia.bars bottom (200 c/c); Asy.bot.prov = 4624 mm2
2
As.min = 3318 mm ; Max.area of reinforcement; As.max = 94680 mm2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
wmax = 0.3 mm; Maximum crack width; wk = 0.013 mm
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
abs(MEd.y.min) = 382.2 kNm; K = 0.015; K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Asy.top.req = 3318 mm2
23 No.16 dia.bars top (200 c/c); Asy.top.prov = 4624 mm2
As.min = 3318 mm2; Max.area of reinforcement; As.max = 94680 mm2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
wmax = 0.3 mm; Maximum crack width; wk = 0.2 mm
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
 Project Job Ref.

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF 132KV TRANSMISSION

Section Sheet no./rev.
CONVENANT UNIVERSITY OTTA
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 7
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

10/30/2019

Rectangular section in shear (Section 6.2)

Design shear force; VEd.y.max = 198.9 kN; Design shear resistance; VRd.c = 761.5 kN
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Punching shear (Section 6.4)
Maximum shear resiastance; vRd.max = 3.680 N/mm2; Punching shear resistance; vRd.c = 0.322 N/mm2
Column No.2 - Punching shear perimeter at column face
Punching shear perimeter; u0 = 1800 mm; Area within shear perimeter; A0 = 0.203 m2
Max.punching shear force; VEd.max = 387.8 kN
Punching shear stress factor;  = 1.500; Max.punching shear stress; vEd.max = 0.605 N/mm2
PASS - Maximum punching shear resistance exceeds maximum punching shear stress
Column No.2 - Punching shear perimeter at 1d from column face
Punching shear perimeter; u1 = 2149 mm; Area within shear perimeter; A1 = 1.336 m2
Design punching shear force; VEd.1 = 209.7 kN
Punching shear stress factor;  = 1.500; Design punching shear stress; vEd.1 = 0.274 N/mm2
PASS - Design punching shear resistance exceeds increased design punching shear stress
Column No.4 - Punching shear perimeter at column face
Punching shear perimeter; u0 = 1800 mm; Area within shear perimeter; A0 = 0.203 m2
Max.punching shear force; VEd.max = 177.4 kN
Punching shear stress factor;  = 1.500; Max.punching shear stress; vEd.max = 0.277 N/mm2
PASS - Maximum punching shear resistance exceeds maximum punching shear stress
Column No.4 - Punching shear perimeter at 1d from column face
Punching shear perimeter; u1 = 2149 mm; Area within shear perimeter; A1 = 1.336 m2
Design punching shear force; VEd.1 = 142.7 kN
Punching shear stress factor;  = 1.500; Design punching shear stress; vEd.1 = 0.187 N/mm2
PASS - Design punching shear resistance exceeds increased design punching shear stress