……..

While I do concede that such a statement holds substantial truth in it, I believe it is mandatory
to look at the issue from a wider angle, for the above mentioned assertion is spurious.

Admittedly,……

Nonetheless, aside from the foregoing argument, I believe it is crucial to avoid a simple perfunctory
study of the question as it will ineluctably burgeon fallacious conclusions. In fact, I do think that…

To begin,

Further,

In essence,

In this memo, the author claims that….. Stated this way, the argument fails to mention several key
factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. In support of his recommendation, the author
reasons that… However, careful scrutiny of the evidence given reveals that it provides little credible
support for the author’s conclusion (,and raises diverse skeptical questions). Hence, the argument, as
it stands now, can be considered unsubstantiated.

First of all, the author readily assumes that ….Thus, if either of these scenarios has merit, the
conclusions drawn in the original argument are significantly weakened.

Further, the argument hastily concludes that….. If the above is true, then the shop owner argument
does not hold water.

Finally, the author points out… that If either case is true, then the shop owner’s claim is not
warranted and his suggestion that the city should prohibit the use of skateboards is not overly
persuasive.

By and large, the argument, as it stands now, is unpersuasive at best and specious at worse, due to
its reliance on several unwarranted assumptions. If the author is able to answer the three questions
above and offer more evidence – perhaps in the form of a systematic research study- then it will be
possible to fully evaluate the viability of the proposed recommendation to forbid the use of
skateboards in the Plaza.

in this memo, the author claims that… Stated this way, the recommendation fails to provide several
key factors on the basis of which it could be evaluated. In support of his argument, the author
reasons that.. However careful scrutiny of the evidence given reveals that it provides little credible
support for the author’s conclusion. Hence, the argument, as it stands now, is unsubstantiated and
three assumptions ought to be studied.

First of all, the author readily claims that.. If either of the above mentioned scenarios has merit, the
conclusions drawn in the original argument are significantly weakened.
Further, the argument hastily assumes that … If the above is true, then the argument no longer holds
water.

Finally, the authors points out that .. the author’s claim is not warranted, and his suggestion Is not
overly persuasive.

In essence, the argument, as it stands now, is unpersuasive at best and specious at worst, due to its
reliance on several unwarranted assumptions. If the author is able to provide more evidence –
perhaps in the form of a systematic study – then it will be fully possible to evaluate to viability og the
recommendation to