Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Review Form
Manuscript title:
A. Overview
B. Reviewer’s comments
Please provide your detailed comments on the article in Section D which should include the
reasons for your recommendation in section C. Bear in mind the need to give constructive
feedback to the authors.
Accept
Accept with minor revisions
Accept subject to major revisions X
Invite resubmission for a new review after major revisions
Reject
MA2017 Page 1
Journal of Technical Education and Training 2017
Review Form
D. Reviewer's Comments
STRENGHTS
WEAKNESSES
1. Tittle:
Tittle are not in line with the content. The title of the study is “STUDY ON
EXPERTISE COMPETENCE TEST MODEL OF ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION FOR
VOCATIONAL SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS” however the findings just
show the criteria need for a competency test, not the model .
2. Abstract:
The abstract need to revise. There are some elements that are not
discussed such as problem statement, research methodology as well.
3. Literature Review(LR)
LR is too long and discuss about the laws (act) of the education system in
Indonesia. Need to discuss comprehensively about competency
test/competency test model
4. Methodology
- The method used is not suitable to develop the model if the main
goal is to develop the model.
- Must discuss how you collect data.
- Should discuss qualitative approach as stated in research method
and should present in finding.
5. Conclusion
- No need to put the percentage in conclusion.
MA2017 Page 2
Journal of Technical Education and Training 2017
Review Form
MA2017 Page 3