JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD.

Doc No : Date of Assessment :

Aspects & Impacts Analysis
Issue No : 01 Issue Date : Rev No : 00 Revision Date : Nil
Department : SMS
Aspect Identification Impact Assessment Impact Mitigation
Classificati Plan
on
Sl No Activity Aspect Condition Adequacy of Measure Impact Applicable Scale (S1) Severity (S2) = L x C Detectability Total Legal
Rule (D) Concern (Yes
N/AB/EM Existing Gaps, if any Likelihood Likelihood (L) Level of (S1+S2+D) / No)
Consequence Consequence
(C)
1 Office Paper N Using both Introduce VL H No 1 4 2 1 10
work waste side of Intranet
paper communica
ting system

e-waste N 0
Energy N 0
Consumpt
ion
2 laddle Fumes N 0
pouring and dust
Heat N 0
Spillage of AB Peiodic VL EPA act 1 4 2 1 10
Hot Metal maintenanc
causing e of
Launder
Land
and
Pollution concrete
flooring
H
Refractory N 0
and slag
wastes
0
0

AIA Assessment Criteria (Refer ISO 14001:2004)

Likelihood Consequence Scale i.e. Area of Impact Detect ability Risk Classification
Highly Unlikely (HUL) i.e. one 1 Slightly Harmful (SH) –Creating 1 Spot 1 On Spot Detection i.e. 1 Trivial 1 –8
occurrence in 1 Yr to 5 Yr or environmental nuisance Instantaneous
Rare
 Unlikely (UL) i.e. one 2 Harmful (H) - Cause of 2 Within Dept 2 Easily Detectable i.e. 2 Moderate 9 – 16
occurrence in 6 month to 1 Yr environmental pollution inside the Low Risk
dept

Likely (L) i.e. one occurrence 3 Very Harmful (VH) - Cause of 3 Within Factory 3 Highly Un Detectable 3 Substantial 17 – 24
in 3 to 6 month environmental pollution inside the i.e. High Risk
entire plant

Very Likely (VL) i.e. one 4 Extremely Harmful (EH) Cause of 4 Outside Factory 4 Not Detectable i.e. Nil 4 Intolerable 25 – 40
occurrence in 1 day to 3 environmental pollution around the
month region