Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Genetics is the study of genes, heredity, and variation in living organisms. It is generally considered a field
of biology, but it intersects frequently with many of the life sciences and is strongly linked with the study
of information systems.
The father of genetics is Gregor Mendel, a scientist and Augustinian friar. Mendel studied 'trait
inheritance,' patterns in the way traits were handed down from parents to offspring. He observed that
organisms (pea plants) inherit traits by way of discrete "units of inheritance". This term, still used today, is
a somewhat ambiguous definition of what is referred to as a gene.
Mendelian Inheritance
Mendelian inheritance is inheritance of biological features that follows the laws proposed by Gregor
Johann Mendel in 1865 and 1866 and re-discovered in 1900. It was initially very controversial. When
Mendel's theories were integrated with the chromosome theory of inheritance by Thomas Hunt Morgan in
1915, they became the core of classical genetics.
Mendel’s laws
Mendel's law of segregation describes what happens to the alleles that make up a gene during formation of
gametes. For example, suppose that a pea plant contains a gene for flower colour in which both alleles
code for red. One way to represent that condition is to write RR, which indicates that both alleles (R and
R) code for the colour red. Another gene might have a different combination of alleles, as in Rr. In this
case, the symbol R stands for red colour and the r for "not red" or, in this case, white. Mendel's law of
segregation says that the alleles that make up a gene separate from each other, or segregate, during the
formation of gametes. That fact can be represented by simple equations, such as:
RR → R + R or Rr → R + r
Mendel's second law is called the law of independent assortment. That law refers to the fact that any plant
contains many different kinds of genes. One gene determines flower colour, a second gene determines
length of stem, and a third gene determines shape of pea pods, and so on. Mendel discovered that the way
in which alleles from different genes separate and then recombine is unconnected to other genes. That is,
suppose that a plant contains genes for colour (RR) and for shape of pod (TT). Then Mendel's second law
says that the two genes will segregate independently, as:
RR → R + R and TT → T + T
Mendel's third law deals with the matter of dominance. Suppose that a gene contains an allele for red
colour (R) and an allele for white colour (r). What will be the colour of the flowers produced on this plant?
Mendel's answer was that in every pair of alleles, one is more likely to be expressed than the other. In other
words, one allele is dominant and the other allele is recessive. In the example of an Rr gene, the flowers
produced will be red because the allele R is dominant over the allele r.
Autosomal dominant
If the phenotype associated with a given version of a gene is observed when an individual has only one
copy, the allele is said to be autosomal dominant. The phenotype will be observed whether the individual
has one copy of the allele (is heterozygous) or has two copies of the allele (is homozygous).
Autosomal recessive
If the phenotype associated with a given version of a gene is observed only when an individual has two
copies, the allele is said to be autosomal recessive. The phenotype will be observed only when the
individual is homozygous for the allele concerned. An individual with only one copy of the allele will not
show the phenotype, but will be able to pass the allele on to subsequent generations. As a result, an
individual heterozygous for an autosomal recessive allele is known as a carrier.
COMMENTS:
In the adjoining pedigree (of my family) it is observed that in the first generation person 1(grandpa) and
person 2(grandma) have free earlobes therefore genotypically both of them have a dominant allele for this
characteristic. In the next generation it is seen that one of their sons (Person5: my 2nd uncle) has attached
earlobes making him homozygous recessive (i.e.ee) and indicating that both the persons of first generation
(i.e. Grandma and grandpa) were heterozygous (i.e. Ee).
Their other four sons and the daughter remain heterozygous (Ee) or homozygous dominant thus possessing
free ear lobes. Person 1(of generation II) gets married to person 2 who phenotypically has free earlobes
(thus genotipically Ee or EE).They have a daughter (person 1 of generation III: my cousin) who again has
free ear lobes hence genotipically Ee or EE. Person 3 and 7 (of generation II: my father and 3rd uncle) get
married to person 4 and 8 of (generation II: my mother and 3rd aunt) respectively who have attached
earlobes hence genotipically ee. Persons 3and 4 (of generation II) have two sons (persons 2 and 3 of
generation III: me and my brother) out of this person 2 (me) has attached earlobe making him genotipically
ee (homozygous recessive), While his brother (person 3 of generation III) has free earlobes thus making
him genotipically Ee (homozygous dominant). Similarly persons 5 and 6 (of generation II) have two sons
(persons 5 and 6 of generation III: my cousins) .
Out of this person 5 has attached ear lobe hence making him homozygous recessive (i.e. ee) and his
brother (person 6, generation III) is heterozygous dominant (Ee).person 5 (generation II: my second uncle)
gets married to person 6(generation III: second aunt) who has free earlobes hence making her homozygous
or heterozygous dominant. They have a son (person 4 generation III: my second cousin) who has free ear
lobes and hence is heterozygous recessive (Ee). Person 9 (generation III: my aunt) gets married to person
10 (generation III) who is homozygous recessive (ee) as he has fused earlobe, they have two children
person (7 and 8 of generation III: my 7th and 8th cousins) who happen to have free earlobes hence are
homozygous dominant (EE) or heterozygous (Ee).
COMMENTS:
In the adjoining pedigree, we can observe person 1 (of generation I: my grandfather) is unable to roll his
tongue hence he is homozygous recessive (rr).Person 2 of generation I (my grandmother) posses the ability
to roll her tongue, hence she may be homozygous dominant or heterozygous. In the second generation it is
observed that out of the six progenies, person 1 and 11 (my fist and 6th uncle) are unable to roll their
tongue and the others posses this ability hence confirming two things:
Person 2 of first generation (grandma) is heterozygous dominant (Rr).
Persons 1 and 2 (of generation II: my uncles) are homozygous recessive (rr). Persons 3, 5, 7 and 9 of
generation II are heterozygous (i.e. Rr).
In second generation person 1 gets married to person 2 who is homozygous dominant (RR, able to roll the
tongue) and have a daughter person1 (of generation III: my cousin) who naturally is a tongue roller and
hence heterozygous dominant (Rr). Person 3 (of generation II: my father) marries person 4 (of generation
II: my mother) who is heterozygous dominant (Rr). They have 2 children (person 2 and 3 of generation III:
me and my brother).
Out of this person 2 (of generation III: me) is a non roller and hence homozygous recessive (rr), while his
brother (person 3, generation III) is a tongue roller and hence heterozygous dominant (Rr). Person 5 (of
generation II: my uncle) gets married to person 6 (of generation II: my aunt) who is a non roller and hence
homozygous recessive ( rr). They have a son who is also a non - roller and hence his homozygous
recessive (rr). Person 7(of generation II) gets married to person 8 who is homozygous dominant (RR, a
Tongue –roller).
They have 2 sons (persons 5 & 6 of generation III), both of them being tongue rollers may be homozygous
dominant (RR) or heterozygous (Rr). Person 9 (of generation III: my aunt) gets married to person 10(of
generation III) who is a non roller and hence homozygous recessive (rr). They have 2 children out of
which, progeny one i.e., person 7 of generation III is a tongue roller and hence heterozygous dominant (Rr)
while her brother (person 8, generation III) is non roller and hence homozygous recessive (rr).
COMMENTS:
In the adjoining pedigree person 1 of generation I (grandfather), shows homozygous recessive trait (ff) as
his right thumb covers over his left. However person 2(of generation 1: my grandmother) shows a
dominant gene as her left thumb over laps her right. She must be heterozygous as three of her six children
show recessive trait, i.e., persons 1, 5, 7 (of generation II: my uncles) show homozygous recessive trait
(ff).
Person 1(of generation II: my uncle) gets married to persons 2(of generation II: my aunt) whose right
thumb overlaps the left hence she is homozygous recessive (ff).They have a daughter (person 1 of
generation III: my cousin) who is also obviously homozygous recessive (ff). Person 3(of generation II: my
father) who is heterozygous (Ff) marries person 4(of generation II: my mother) whose right thumb
overlaps the left; hence she is homozygous recessive (ff). They have two children (person 2&3 of
generation III: me and my brother), both of them are homozygous recessive (f f).
Person 5 (of generation II: my uncle) who is homozygous recessive marries person 6 (of generation II: my
aunt) whose left thumb overlaps her right, making her homozygous dominant (FF).They have a son
(person 4 of generation III) whose left thumb overlaps the right making him heterozygous(Ff) .
Person 7 (of generation II) who is homozygous recessive marries person 8(of generation III: my aunt)
whose left thumb overlaps her right hence making her homozygous dominant (FF).This is evident from the
fact that both of her children (person 5&6 of generation III: my cousins) appear to be heterozygous (Ff) as
for both of them their left thumb overlaps their right.
Persons 9 (of generation II: my aunt) who appears to be homozygous dominant (FF) gets married to person
10 (of generation II: my uncle) who also appears to be homozygous dominant (FF).They have two children
(persons 7&8: my cousins) who are also naturally homozygous dominant (FF).
Comments:
In the adjoining pedigree we see that person 1 of generation I (my grandfather) possesses the hitchhikers
thumb as he is homozygous recessive (ss). She marries person 2 (my grandmother) who as a straight
thumb. She may hence be heterozygous/ homozygous dominant (Ss/ss). However it is evident that she is
heterozygous as out of their 6 children persons 3, 5, 9,) possess the hitchhikers thumb and hence are
homozygous recessive (ss)
Out of this person 9(of generation II: my aunt) marries person 10(of generation II: my uncle) who also
possess hitchhikers making him homozygous recessive (ss). They have 2 children (person 7&8 of
generation: III) who are also evidently homozygous recessive (ss) and hence possess hitchhikers thumb.
Person 7 (of generation II) who is heterozygous (Ss) marries person 8 who is homozygous recessive (ss)
possessing hitchhikers thumb. They have 2 children out of which their first child (person 5 of generation
III: my cousin) is homozygous recessive (ss) as he has the hitchhikers thumb while his brother is
heterozygous (Ss) as he has a straight thumb.
Person 1(of generation II: my uncle) who is heterozygous (Ss) gets married to person 2(of generation III)
who also possesses a straight thumb and hence is heterozygous (Ss). They have a daughter (person 1 of
generation III) who has a hitchhikers thumb and hence as a homozygous recessive genotype (ss). Person
3(of generation II: my father) possesses the hitchhikers thumb and hence is homozygous recessive (ss).He
marries person 4 (of generation II: my mother) who has a straight thumb. It is clearly evident that person 4
of generation II is heterozygous as one her children (person 2 of generation III: me) is homozygous
recessive (ss) while his brother (person 3, generation III) is heterozygous dominant and hence shows
straight thumb.
Person 5(of generation II: my uncle) being homozygous recessive (ss) gets married to person 6(of
generation II: my aunt) who is also homozygous recessive (ss), i.e. both of them possess the hitchhiker’s
thumb. They have a son (person 4 of generation III: my cousin) who naturally possesses the hitchhiker’s
thumb, so he has a homozygous recessive gene (ss) straight thumb and he is heterozygous dominant
CONCLUSION:
Gregor Mendel the father of genetics postulated his three Laws of Inheritance, which eventually became
the basis of modern day genetics. These laws namely “Law of Dominance”, “Law of Segregation” & “Law
of Independent Assortment” can be used to analyse types of genetic disorders and inheritance patterns.
Pedigree charts, made based on Mendel’s Laws can be used to analyze and study Inheritance patterns of
different genes in a family hence helping in diagnosing and curing several genetic disorders.
On the whole genetics, an endless study has helped us, human beings to understand ourselves in way that
is unimaginable. The vastness of this study is far greater than anything known to man and now as this
study deepens into the vastness perhaps there is hope in the future for a society free from any kind of
disease and sufferings. Who knows, one day it may even provide us with answers to questions about our
origin
Reference
• Class XI practical textbook .
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedict%27s_reagent
• http://www.chemguide.co.uk/organicprops/carbonyls/oxidation.html
• http://www.texascollaborative.org/spencer_Pedigree Analysis/ds_sub2.htm
• http://www.austincc.edu/mlt/ua/ua_links.html