Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
6 j oi nt w'ith the
7 COI4MITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM
8 and the
9 COMM]TTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS,
ll WASHINGTON, D.C.
t2
l3
14
t7
l8
l9
20 Tuesday, 0ctober 22, 2019
2t Washi ngton, D. C.
22
23
l5
l6
t7
l8
l9
20
2t
22
Z)
24
25
3
I Appearances:
2
l0
ll
t2
t3
t4
l5
l6
t7
l8
l9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
4
l0
l1
t4
l5
l6
t7
l8
20
2t JEFFREY H. SMITH
t4 congressional subpoena.
t5 Ambassador Taylor has served our country as a
l8 unfavorable.
t9 Speaker Pelosi and Chai rman Schi ff's so-ca11ed
2l Mr. Goldman.
23 deposition of a --
24 THE CHAIRMAN: No further remarks will be entertained at
25 this time. l'4r. Goldman.
11
I |\4R. ROY: We11, why won't you address the legi timate
2 concerns of this
a
J VOICES: Out of order.
4 MR. ROY: Thi s whole heari ng i s out of order. We've got
5 members of this committee
6 MRS. DEMINGS: You rea11y don't want to hear from thi s
7 wi tness, do you?
8 MR. ROY: I would like the entire Congress to hear from
9 thi s wi tness.
t7 T- a-y- 1 -o- r .
l8 MR. G0LDMAN: Thank you.
I Russi ans that we are Ukrai ne's re1 i able strategi c partner;
2 and, finally, as the committees are now aware, I said on
J September 9th, in a message to Ambassador Gordon Sondland,
4 that wi thholdi ng securi ty assi stance i n exchange for help
5 with a domestic political campaign in the United States would
6 be crazy. I beljeved that then, and I still believe that.
7 Let me now provide the committees a chronology of the
8 events that 1ed to my concern. 0n l'4ay 28th of thi s year, I
9 met with Secretary Mike Pompeo who asked me to return to Kyiv
l0 to lead our Embassy in Ukraine. It was and is a critical
ll time in the U.S.-Ukraine relations.
t2 Volodymyr Zelensky had just been elected President, and
l3 Ukrai ne remai ned at war wi th Russi a. As the summer
t4 approached, a new Ukrain'ian Government would be seated,
l5 partiamentary elections were imminent, and the Ukrainian
t6 political trajectory would be set for the next several years.
t7 I had served as Ambassador to Ukraine from 2005 to 2009,
t8 having been nominated by George W. Bush. And in the
t9 intervening L0 years, I have stayed engaged with Ukrajne
20 visiting frequently since 2013 as a board member of a smal1
2t Ukrai n'i an, nongovernmental organi zati on supporti ng good
22 governance and reform.
23 Across the responsi bi 1 i ti es I have had i n publ i c
24 al for me, and Secretary Pompeo's
servi ce, Ukrai ne i s speci
25 offer to return as chjef of mission was compelf ing. I am
20
7 affai rs, Fiona Hi 11, and the NSC's di rector for European
8 affai rs, Alex Vi ndman, on J u1y 19th .
5 k'i nd .
I the Bi dens.
t7 first is the one we are discussing this morning and that you
l8 have been hearing for the past 2 weeks. It's a rancorous
t9 story about whistleblowers, Mr. Gjuliani, side channels, quid
20 pro quos, corrupti on, i nterf erence 'in electi ons. In thi s
2l story Ukraine is an object.
22 But there's another Ukrai ne story, a posi ti ve,
23 bi parti san one. In thi s second story, Ukrai ne i s the
24 subj ect. Thi s one i s about young people 'in a young nation
25 struggling to break free of its past, hopeful their new
43
25
44
a
J
10
ll
t2
l3
t4
l5
t6
t7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
45
5 BY MR. GOLDMAN:
6 a 0kaY.
23
24
25
50
I [10:53 a. m. ]
2 BY MR. GOLDI4AN:
8 A Correct.
9 a did you know about that?
How
ll BY MR. GOLDMAN:
l5 A I do.
t6 a Okay. Was this what you were referring to?
t7 A It WAS.
25 Trump.
53
4 article?
5 A This was one of the several concerns I had when
6 considering whether to accept the offer to go back out to
7 Kyiv. This was part of the one of the two snake pits,
8 this is the Washington snake pit that I was concerned I would
9 be stepping into if I were to accept the offer. So this made
l0 me less interested, this made me concerned, it troubled me
24 And the concern was that the strong support, the policy
25 of strong support for Ukraine, that as I said in my
55
ll to these concerns?
t2 A Same thing. We1l, he said you need to I saw him
l3 about 3 days, the Thursday before the Monday meeting with
t4 Secretary Pompeo, he sa'id, you'11 have an opportuni ty to ask
I a Yes.
7 Pompeo.
t4 themselves.
l5 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: So who did I hear from
l6 BY MR. GOLDMAN:
l7 a Yeah.
t9 a Ri ght.
20 A I'm sure Kurt Volker -- I imagine we had several
9 negoti at'i ons. There have been examples, we've heard about
l0 them recently of other civilians doing work for the State
ll Department. And as long as the people pu11ed in from the
t2 outside, consulted from the outside, giving advice or ideas
l3 on policy, that's we see that all the tjme. We all have
t4 seen that, and that's okay, as long as it's consistent with
l5 and supports the main thrust of U.S. fore'ign policy.
l6 And so at the time I didn't think that that was a
l7 problem.
l8 a Over time, did your view of that change?
l9 A It did.
20 a get into that a 1itt1e bit tater. Did
And we'11
2l you come to understand whether any of those three individuals
22 spoke to Mr. Giuliani after the President directed them to do
23 so on May 23rd?
24 A I know Kurt, Ambassador Volker, spoke to him on the
25 phone a couple of times, I think had a breakfast with him
62
J Zelensky.
4 So Ithat Ambassador Volker had some
know did fo11ow
5 up. And I'm pretty sure that Ambassador Sondland had some
6 contact w'i th Rudy Gi uf iani as we11 .
l2 A Yes
I other parts of the conversation. That was the one piece that
2 stuck out sticks out to that I included here.
me
3 a And di d you know at that t'ime what
4 investigations Ambassador Sondland was referring to?
5 A I did not. I didn't, you know, I knew that these
6 were that Mr . Gi uf i ani was pursui ng some i nvesti gati ons
7 and I hadn't again, this was L0 days after arriving there
8 I hadn't put this together. 5o no I wasn't sure what he was
9 tatki ng about, nor was I sure the next day, "in thi s larger
l0 phone ca11, what people were referring to when they talked
ll about investigations.
t2 a AndI believe you testified in your opening
l3 statement that the call the next day there was a reference to
l4 'investigations to, quote, "Get to the bottom of things. "
l5 unquote.
t6 A That's correct. And that was Ambassador Volker
l7 intended to say to President Zelensky when Ambassador Volker
l8 sat down with President Zelensky in Toronto at an assistance
t9 conference, at a reform conference that was coming up the
20 following week. And yes, it was -- and again, from my notes
2t in preparing this from my notes preparing this, this
22 actually was i n the f ittle spi ral notebook by my desk 'in the
23 office where I had that meeting had that phone call is
24 where I have that quote.
25 a Was the reference to investigations by Ambassador
64
I Sondland on June 27fi the earliest date or time that you can
2 reca11 any discussion of investigations?
J A And again, before I came out there, w€'d had some
4 conversati ons I 'm Sure that I had conversati on wi th Deputy
5 Assistant Secretary Kent about the Giuliani role, which made
6 me concerned and the role was an investigation So I wanted to
I A It not. And
was and Ambassador Volker intended
2 to pass that message in Toronto several days later
J a Okay. And did you speak to Ambassador Volker after
4 he went to Toronto i n early J uly?
5 A Many times. But about that?
6 a Speci ficatly about a conversation that he had with
7 President Zelensky?
8 A Yes.
25 BY MR. GOLDMAN:
67
8 A Yeah.
l6 sure, and I think Lutsenko had the same view that in order to
t7 have this meeting, get this meeting between the two
l8 Presi dents that Mr . Gi ul i an'i was goi ng to be an i mportant
t9 player.
20 a Did they understand why Mr. Giuliani had indicated
2t that there would -- the phone call was unlikety to happen?
22 A I don't know.
./.) a Okay. And you said that you relayed these concerns
24 to Counselor Brechbuhl?
25 A I did.
69
7 I'm sure we had conversations about it. I had also had set
8 him up again as the National Security Advisor for Ukraine. I
9 also set him up to see in Washington Steve Hadley who had of
l0 course had that job earlier, and they had a good meeting as
ll we11.
t9 A No.
25 your reaction?
71
they may have been closed, the investigation may have been
t4
l5 BY l,IR. GOLDMAN:
2t you see I t?
22 A Yes, yes.
a And i f you could read. This is a text from you on
24 a chai n wi th Gordon Sondland and Kurt Volker and you're
25 writing here can you read it?
74
2l that.
22 As the month of July went on and some of these suggest
I phone call?
2 A Phone ca1 1 . I 'm sor ry, phone ca1 1 .
24 A Yes.
6 A Later.
7 a After their meeting?
8 A Well after.
9 a Well after their meeting?
l0 A Yeah.
.t) A Correct.
24 a But were you aware that this message, that Volker
25 texted to Yermak, were you aware that that message was
79
9 Ukrai ne?
l0 A I am sure that happened based on all the things I
ll said. So Mr. Goldman, you asked me did I know it at that
t2 poi nt or on 7 /25?
l3 o Ri ght.
t4 A The answer must be yes, yeah. I knew it in July it
l5 became clearer and clearer
l6 a 0kay. djd not you said it was I think
And you
t7 somewhat strange that you did not get a readout of the July
l8 25th ca11. Is that ri ght?
l9 A That's correct. It's a 1itt1e strange, it's not a
20 lot strange. We didn't get very many readouts, but
2t a And I believe you were in Kyiv and so was
l6 brief lunch break. Would you like a rest room break now
t7 before we begin?
l8 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: I'm fine, I'm fine. I appreciate
t9 the offer.
20 THE CHAiRMAN: Okay. Thank you. L hour to the
2t minority, sir.
22 BY MR. CASTOR:
5 was 1 i kely to
6 A I'd seen the pattern of other witnesses who were
7 under the same instruction I was and presumably we were under
8 the same constra'int and that when they received the subpoena
l0 th i ng.
l5 A Ambassador Sondland.
I A No.
l3
t4
l5
l6
t7
l8
l9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
86
I [1].:53 a.m.l
2 BY MR. CASTOR:
I A Yes.
ll A Flawed.
t2 a Sojs it fa'i r to say that if some of these
l3 companies, some of these otigarchs had been under
t4 investigation at some point in time that the investigation
l5 may have been closed for improper purposes?
t6 A Yes. It could have been closed for payments, yes.
t7 a So, inherently, the interest of somebody in the
l8 Unjted States of wanting to wanting Ukraine to get to the
t9 bottom of corruption is not a problem, right?
20 A We have long made it, over certainly while I was
2t there in 2006-2009 and subsequently, have long made it clear
22 to the Ukrainian Governments over time that their ability to
23 integrate into Europe and succeed in that goal was challenged
24 by, was threatened by, a lack of credible rule of 1aw, which
25 included courts, investigations.
B8
9 thei r board?
t0 A Recently, there have been questions about -- wel1,
l1 recently there have been questions about boards of Naftogaz.
t2 So the answer js yes, in that case.
13 of issues are the corporate boards of the
Another set
t4 state-owned banks. And decisions about who is appointed to
l5 the state-owned bank boards has been an i ssue for the for
l6 the independence of the National Bank of Ukraine, the NBU, in
t7 confl i ct wi th the admi ni strati on.
l8 So the short answer is yes, the board membership has
l9 been an issue that we've paid some attention to.
20 a 0kay. And what's the Embassy's ordi nary posture
23 a Do you
9 BY MR. CASTOR:
l3 Iz
l4 A Again, I thjnk in that same connection where I've
l5 recently heard that issue that you the connection that you
l6 j ust descri bed, I thi nk that's the name. That's about the
t7 limjt of my knowledge on that.
l8 a Fai r enough. When you arri ved at post, di d anybody
l9 give you briefings about --
20 A They didn't.
2t a or
22 A They d'i dn ' t .
25 A They di dn't
94
8 U.S., Chaly, had entered the fray, the political fray, and
9 wrote an op-ed i n opposi t'ion to then-cand jdate Trump?
l0 A I was not aware.
1l a Is that ordinary or --
t2 A It's not. Ambassadors do not are not supposed
l3 to and should not interfere in or participate in domestic
l4 elections, the host country etections.
l5 a Did anyone at the Embassy ever call to your
l6 attention the 'issue with Ambassador Chaly?
t7 A In thi s context, no. In other contexts, i n
l8 particular the Zelensky administration, the new
t9 administration was looking to replace him as soon as they
20 could once they came jnto office. This, of course, was this
2l past summer.
2 A Correct.
3 a Flipping ove r to page t4, the paragraph begins
4 "Ukraine's Minister of Internal Affai rs, Arsen Avakov. " You
5 wi th me?
4 but
5 a Flipping to page 15, the paragraph that begins with
6 "Andriy Artemenko. "
23 significance, right?
24 A Leschenko was a well-known reformer and a well
25 and a good journalist beforehand, so yes, well-recognized.
101
I unde rmi ne h i m?
2 A that opinion, that some were. If
You could have
3 this reporting is correct, you could certainly have the
4 opi ni on that some Ukrai ni ans were.
5 a 0kay. And do you have any si nce you've arrived
6 at post, has anyone briefed you to try to debunk any of these
7 allegations?
8 A No.
l6 can. So
t7 a Just forgive me. If there was a concern about the
t8 20L6 elect'ion and concern about jnvestigations, d'id you ever
t9 try to do some due diligence find out exactly what the
and
20 concerns were before you arrived at post?
2t A No.
22 a Did you have any conversations with Yovanovitch
23 about thi s?
24 A About --
25 a The environment, the snake pit I think you called
104
I it.
2 A had I had a conversation with her
Certainly, we
J in Kyiv and then again in Washington about the about that
4 envi ronment, about how the domesti c, our domestj c po1 i ti cs
5 had gotten into the into affecting her career.
6 a 0kay. But did you ever have a discussion about
7 what, you know, when yoLr're did you ever try to get 'into
8 the what was the genui ne concern f rom G'iuli ani , other
9 than
l0 A No.
t2 said
l3 A Yes.
l6 A Yes.
t7 a And then you met with her again after she came
l8 home
t9 A Correct.
20 a before you went out?
2t A Correct.
22 a So is that roughly three conversations?
23 A Three conversations, at 1east, yeah.
24 a And what do you reca11 her telling you?
25 A I reca11 in particular the last conversation, which
105
4 something wrong. She felt like someone had she felt that
5 someone or some people may have had other motives for wanting
t2 Giuliani
l3 A None.
t4 a di recttY?
l5 A No. He visited Kyiv in 2008 or '07, while I was
l6 there. 2008, I think. And I remember shaking his hand. He
t7 was America's mayor. But otherwise, not.
l8 a But for times relevant, May 28th on, you've never
20 A No, no.
2l a Has anyone ever asked you to speak to Mr. Giulian'i?
22 A No.
6 A None.
7 a The Whi te House offi ci als you have had di scussi ons
8 wi th, have you i denti fi ed them for the most part in your
9 statement?
l0 A Yes
13 A Vi ndman , ri ght .
4 A Yes.
l9 a 0kaY.
20 A And i t wasn't I didn't thi nk i t was bad. I
21 di dn't thi nk i t was a problem i n the begi nni ng. And,
22 actual1y, it could have been helpfuI, because Ambassador
23 Sondland is able is able to call the President, and that's
24 a valuable thing jf you want to try to move our U.S.-Ukraine
25 relat'ions a1ong. So, at the beginning, it was not a problem.
110
20 A Yes.
,/.J A Yes.
ll A Yes.
t2 a Okay. And then 'it's also been related to us that
l3 the Presi dent sai d, "Ta1k to Rudy, " and i t's i n a di smi ssi ve
t4 sort of way. You know, the President had his concerns about
l5 corruption in Ukraine and, you know, a laundry list of
16 reasons, including the fact that the Pres'ident believed that
l7 there were Ukrainians trying to work agajnst him in the
l8 electi on, ri ght?
l9 A As we established, some Ukrainians, a couple of
20 Ukrainians. And the important point here is none of those,
2t with the exception of Avakov, who is sti11 none of those
22 were in or are in the Zelensky administration.
23 So that's what as I understand it, that's what
6 A Ri ght.
7 a He said negative things about the country of
8 Ukra i ne .
t7 make thi s advi sory peri odi ca11y. What counsel represents
l8 prior witnesses may have said or not said, we cannot vouch
22 should not assume facts that are not in evidence before you.
23 AMBASSAD0R TAYL0R: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
24 BY MR. CASTOR:
I you know, that occur in these meetings. There's ambi gui ti es,
12 A No.
9 MR. NUNES: Yes, that there was one that completed, and
l0 now those i nvesti gati ons have even cont'inued.
ll AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: I don't know much about it, Mr.
ll pretty sure.
t2 MR. NUNES: 0kay. So he's of parti cular i nterest to at
l3 least the Republicans 'in Congress. Are you aware that he was
t4 a source for the Democrats and the Clinton campaign's dirt
l5 that they dug up on the President and fed to the FBI?
l6 AMBASSAD0R TAYL0R: I am not aware.
25 Ratcl i ffe.
119
I would have been well over a month after the July 25th call
2 between President Trump and President Zelensky.
J AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: COTTCCt.
4 MR. RATCLIFFE: So you're not a lawyer, are you,
5 Ambassador Taylor?
t9 was put on the security assistance. And Juty 25th, they had
20 a conversation between the two Presidents, where it was not
2t di scussed.
22 MR. RATCLIFFE: And to your knowledge, nobody in the
ZJ Ukrainian Government was aware of the hold?
24 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: That is correct.
I I yield back.
2 THE CHAIRMAN: 0kay. The time of the minority has
J expi red.
4 Let's break for lunch until L:30. I want to remi nd
5 members they are not to di scuss the substance of the
l0
ll
t2
l3
t4
l5
l6
17
l8
19
20
2t
22
23
24
25
122
I [].:55 p.m.l
2 THE CHAIRMAN: We're back on the record.
J Ambassador, I wanted to just ask you a few followup
4 questions to the questions you received from the minority,
5 and then I want to go through some of your opening statement.
6 Then I'11 hand it over to Mr. Noble, who will go much more
7 methodically than I will through your testimony and the
8 timeline.
9 You were asked by my colleagues in the minority doesn't
l0 the U.S. have a legitimate interest in fighting corruption,
ll and I think you would agree that we do. Is that right?
t2 AMBASSADOR TAYL0R: That is correct, Chairman.
24 know the direct ljnks there, but there were people who were
25 concerned that she was so tough on i t would be hard for
123
3 Ukra'ine?
4 AMBASSAD0R TAYL0R: Yes, yes, and supporting reformers
5 or other people in the government who were fighting
6 corruption in Ukraine.
7 THE CHAIRMAN: And you can distinguish, can't you,
24 was that there were efforts being made through this irregular
25 channel to get Ukraine to jnterfere in U.S. politics and the
124
ll about the timing of this ca11. This call had been set up.
t2 Obviously, when you're trying to get the head of state on a
l3 ca11, get President Zelensky on a ca11, you had to work
t4 through the timi ng. Was j t conveni ent? Could he there
l5 may have had to be interpreters present. He had to be at the
l6 ri ght phone. So we were work'ing on when the meeti ng would
t7 happen.
25
127
I 12:02 p.m.l
2 THE CHAIRMAN: And what was odd to you about that?
J At'4BASSADOR TAYL0R: Thi s suggested to me that there were
I by 14r. Giuliani."
2 How had that clear to you by mid-Ju1y?
become
22 that President Zelensky speak first. That is, until you say
23 publicly you're going to do these two investigations we want
24 f or the Pres'ident, you're not going to get that meeting.
I took.
2 AMBASSAD0R TAYL0R: Yes.
J THE CHAIRMAN: Now, my colleague in the minority asked
J that the directive had come from the President to the Chief
4 of Staff to 0M8."
5 That is the directive not to provide the military
6 assistance, or to hold it up. Is that right?
7 AMBASSAD0R TAYLOR: That's correct.
8 THE CHAIRMAN:"In an instant, I realized that one of
9 the key pillars of our strong support for Ukrajne was
l0 threatened. The i rregular policy channel was running
ll contrary to the goals of longstandjng U.5. policy. "
t2 What did you mean by that?
l3 Al\4BASSAD0R of U.S. policy
TAYL0R: Longstanding goal
t4 would be to support Ukraine in its attempt to defend itself
15 against the Russians. Part of that was security assistance.
l6 Securi ty assi stance had been very effective. It was weapons,
t7 it was train'ing, it was the commun'ications equipment, it was
l8 sustainables. It allowed Ukrainian sold'iers to actually
l9 defend themselves.
20 That was longstanding U S . pol i cy. Even i n the previ ous
2l administration, the previous administration d'id not provide
22 1etha1 weapons, but they did provide all this other -- so
23 that was longstanding policy To stop it, to hold it, for no
I that.
2 THE CHAIRMAN: to page 9 of your testimony,
Turning
J second paragraph, about midway through: "A formal
4 U. S. request to the Ukrai ni ans to conduct an i nvesti gati on
2t improper about this, weren't there? There was the one you're
22 mentioning now, which is that it wasn't appropriate to ask
23 Ukraine to investigate a violation of Ukrainian 1aw, correct?
24 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: Correct.
25 THE CHAIRMAN: But it was also improper because the goal
137
t2 tetl them, they were aware of other asks the President had
13 made in that catl, right? You know that now, although you
t4 didn't at the time.
l5 AI'4BASSADOR TAYLOR: 0n correct, on the meeting.
l6 the Ukrai ni ans learned on
THE CHAIRI"IAN: And even though
t7 August 29th that there had been a hold placed, they certainly
l8 knew up through this whole period of June, Ju1y, August that
t9 they hadn' t yet recei ved the ai d, ri ght?
20 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: The ai d so, ri ght. The ai d had,
2t by and large, not been put out to contract.
22 It's L-year money, by the way. If we can make 'it 2-year
23 money, that would be great. This is a littte plug here for
24 2 -year money.
I September. And i t was late i n comi ng 'in the f i scal year, and
6 page 10, "It had st'i11 not occurred to me that the hold on
7 securi ty assi stance could be related to the ' i nvesti gati ons. '
t7 readout "over the phone f rom l'4r. Morri son, duri ng whi ch he
23 only not going to get the White House meeting, they were also
24 not going to get the military assistance.
25 AMBASSADOR TAYL0R: That is what Mr. Sondland told
142
I Mr. Yermak.
ll right?
t2 AMBASSAD0R it would he realized
TAYL0R: He thought
l3 that it had been a mistake to condition it only on the
t4 meeti ng.
l5 THE CHAIRMAN: That jt was also the military
l6 assistance was also going to be conditioned on the commitment
23 doi ng
24 AMBASSAD0R TAYLOR: AbsolutelY.
25 MR. QUIGLEY: and they knew each other's role?
149
I regular track, and as you could see from the emails, or the
2 texts, I was included on some of those. So there was some
J coord i nat j on among that .
l9 meeti ng as well.
20 THE CHAIRMAN: Mr. Swalwe11.
2t MR. SWALWELL: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
22 And thank you, Ambassador.
23 Do you have any reason to befieve, Ambassador, that
24 anyt'ime during your communications with Ambassador Sondland
25 that Ambassador Sondland misrepresented the directives or
151
I to the minority.
2 BY MR. CASTOR:
l0 aggress i on?
ll A Yes.
6 A Yes.
7 a fj nanci al assi stance
8 A I was very happy about that.
9 a OkaY.
l0 A Yes.
ll a And that was an improvement of years prior?
t2 A It was.
l3 a Was it a substantial improvement?
t4 A It was a substantiat improvement, in that this
l5 administration provided Javeljn antitank weapons. These are
l6 defensjve weapons, and they deter, and I beljeve successfully
t7 deter, Russi ans from tryi ng to grab more terri tory, to push
l8 forward any further tank attack, number one. So there was a
l9 mi 1i tary capabi 1i ty.
20 There was also a very strong political message that said
2t that the Americans are willing to provide more than blankets.
22 I mean, that was the prevjous. And these weapons are serious
23 weapons. They wi 11 ki 11 Russi an tanks. 5o these were
24 serious weapons. It was a demonstration that we support
25 Ukrai ne.
156
t7 a OkaY.
1 a 0kaY.
9 Zelensky call?
l0 A Yes.
24 So did you write the memo about the calt but also the
25 pre-cal1?
161
I a Uh-huh.
4 a We' re on page 6.
5 A You're on page 6, but I've in order to
jumped
l8 A No.
20 long ways.
24 a on Ju1y L0th
25 A Yes.
166
7 A He did. He did.
8 a the other commi tments that were made to you?
t9 was, it was both about your concerns that you had learned the
I July 10th meeting in Ukraine with the jndividuals you had met
2 with, Mr. Zelensky's Chjef of Staff? Did you fill him in on
J that as well?
4 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR:I dON't thiNK I did.
5 MR. JORDAN: Is it fair to say the bulk of the
6 conversat'ion was Dr. Hill and Lieutenant Colonel Vindman
7 retating to you what happened at the July L0th meeting here
8 in the United States?
9 AMBASSADOR TAYL0R: The first part of the conversatjon
l3 being held up. And none of the three of us had any idea why.
t4 MR. J0RDAN: 0kay.
l5 AI,IBAS SADOR TAYLOR: And then they went into this other
l6 di scussion about the July 10th meeti ng.
t7 MR. J0RDAN: 0kay. Any idea which took the bulk of the
l8 time of the phone call?
t9 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: I'm sure the July l-0th d"iscussion
20 of the July L0th meeting took the bulk of the cal1.
2l MR. J0RDAN: The bulk of the tjme was on this meet'ing
22 that took place at the White House.
23 AMBASSAD0R TAYL0R: Yes.
24 MR. JORDAN: Okay.
25 5teve, thank you.
170
I [3 : 05 p.m. ]
2 BY MR. CASTOR:
I r ea son
6 a Ri ght.
7 A I don't recall. I don't thi nk so. I thi nk
8 actually I could check my text messages. Schedul i ng that
9 call was a challenge.
l0 a 0kay.
ll A And 'it went back and f orth i n te rms of ti me. SoI
t2 don' t think I had a conversation with Vindman and Hi 11 about
l3 that at that point.
t4 a What was NSC's position on the call?
l5 A They opposed i t.
t6 a Okay. And so Dr. Hi 11 oPPosed i t?
t7 A Certainly her boss opposed it.
18 a So Ambassador Bolton opposed the call?
t9 A He did.
20 a 0kay ?
t4 BoI ton.
l5 a Ri ght.
t6 A And the call was not yet locked in, scheduled.
t7 a OkaY.
l8 A And it was going back and forth there was some
l9 ta1k. There was some as I reca11, there was, you know
20 it was on and off, the call's on, the call's off. It is
2t scheduled for here. Not going to happen. I could go back
22 through the records if you want.
23 a Okay. To the extent that you can recall --
24 A Yes.
25 a when did you then learn that this July 25th call
174
I would be scheduled?
2 A I -- trying to schedule it for about
we11, we were
J a week in advance, that whole week. As I say, back and
4 forth, yes, flo, this time, that time. So that was I was
5 doing it on the Ukrainian side and trying to go back to the
6 trying to keep the NSC advised as to what was going on.
7 And I think it was kind of it may have been about the day
8 before that'it was actually locked down, So about the 24th.
9 a Okay. And did you fjnd out whY
l0 A Why?
ll a the change.
t2 A No. As youjust made the point, Ambassador Bolton
l3 waS not 'interested 'in havi ng d'id not want to have the call
t4 because he thought'it was going to be a disaster. He thought
l5 that there could be some talk of investigations or worse on
l6 the ca1I. Turned out he was right. So he didn't want to
t7 have the ca11. I think it was the Chief of Staff who helped
l8 schedule that ca11.
t9 a Mr. Mulvaney?
20 A Mr. Mulvaney.
2t a 0kay. Do you remember when you finally found out
22 that the call was happening and you had to go alert the
23 Ukrai ni ans?
24 A We were alerting the Ukrainians back and forth. We
25 had given them a couple of head fakes all the way through
175
t2 a Was that the first tjme that you knew Volker and
l3 Giuliani were talking about?
t4 A You know, Mr. Castor it was about that time I
l5 was looking at my notes last night or the night before it
l6 was about that t'ime that I heard f rom Dr. Hi 11 that Kurt
t7 mentioned Kurt sends a text that I have to check to see if
l8 I was on, but in some text that Kurt sent about this time, he
l9 sai d: I had a good breakfast wi th Mr. Gi u1 i ani . Maybe you
20 have already pointed this out earljer today. Was that right?
2t I t was 'i n one of your test
a Uh-huh.
5 Kurt's note back to Rudy Gi u1i ani sayi ng: Thanks for the
9 same ti me.
20 A Yes.
I goes a month, goes from July L8th into the middle of August
2 and sti 11 i s not resolved. I t 'is attempti ng to be resolved,
5 and there were descriptions to me from Tim Morrison of how
4 they tried to get the principals in the same room, couldn't
5 do it, schedules, et cetera. I then I did, I ca11ed
6 Counselor Brechbuhl, talked to John Bolton
7 O This is much 1ater.
8 A Thjs is in August.
9 a OkaY.
l0 A This is in August.
ll a I'm just after the, you know, it seems like the
12 July 20th communication you had wi th Danyliuk rea1ly
l3 crystalized that this was also becoming a concern on the
t4 Ukrai ni an sj de of thi ngs.
l5 A It was a concern on the Ukrainian side.
l6 a And I'm j ust wonderi ng i f you did anythi ng ri ght
t7 then and there other than Sondland, VoIker channel?
l8 A I wi 11 check agai n.
l9 a Okay. And then the July 25th call happens.
20 A Yes.
2t a Who did you get a readout from about the July 25th
22 call?
23 A Three people. One was a very short message from
24 Danyliuk, wh'ich said: Went wel1. 0h, there was also the
25 Ukrai ni ans put out the Ukraj ni an 0ffi ce of the President
180
I put out short descri pti on. Turned out, looki ng back on i t,
a
t4 paragraph.
l5 AMBASSADOR TAYL0R: Congressman, I'llt sorry. Which page?
t6 MR. ZELDIN: Page 9 of your opening statement, where you
t7 discuss Mr. Yermak asking the United States to submit an
l8 offi ci a1 request for an i nvesti gation i nto Buri sma's alleged
t9 v'iolati ons of Ukrai ni an 1aw.
20 AMBASSAD0R TAYL0R: Yes, si r.
2t MR. ZELDiN: Was that request ever made by the United
22 States?
23 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: No, not to my knowledge.
1 to ask you what you mean by it, and we're not going to
2 obviously, we wouldn't accept the answer that you don't speak
J Latin. We want to know what you mean about it. I'11 let
4 Mr. Ratcliffe get into that further with you.
5 THE CHAIRMAN: Let's take a 5- or 10-minute break, and
l0
ll
t2
l3
t4
l5
t6
17
l8
l9
20
2t
22
L)
24
25
187
1 14:45 p.m.l
2 THE CHAIRMAN: Okay. Let's go back on the record.
J Fo1ks, settle down a bit. Let's go back on the record.
4 Just a few follow-up questions before I hand it over to
5 Mr. Nob1e, Ambassador.
6 l'ly colleagues on the mi nori ty asked you about general
7 circumstancesin which aid may be withheld, that this kind of
8 thing happens. So I want to ask you a little further about
9 that.
l0 There are certainly legitimate occas'ions when aid'is
ll withheld, such as when Congress decides in its policy
t2 judgment to withhold a'id. Am I right.
l3 AI,IBASSADOR TAYLOR: YeS, siT.
t4 THE CHAIRMAN: And there may be other circumstances,
l5 changing conditions on the ground somewhere, where a decis'ion
l6 will be made to wjthhold aid, appropriately so, correct?
t7 AMBASSADOR TAYL0R: Yes, si r.
l8 THE CHAIRMAN:But you can djstinguish between
l9 appropriate ci rcumstances 'in which aid is wjthheld and
20 i 11egi tjmate ci rcumstances i n whi ch aid i s w'i thheld to coerce
2t another country to do something improper.
22 AMBASSAD0R TAYL0R: You can.
23 THE CHAI RMAN: Now, my co1 leagues asked you , wel 1 ,
I at the time that it was released are you aware that the White
2 House was in possession of a whistleblower complaint now
J public -- that alleged that the assistance may be w'ithheld
4 for reasons of wanting leverage over Ukraine for political
5 investigations? Were you aware that at the time it was
6 released the White House already knew the existence of this
7 complai nt?
8 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: Mr. Chairman, I don't know that.
l0 the aid was released that'in fact there were public reports
ll in newspapers that the aid may be withheld for this improper
t2 reason?
I page L0 you talk about a phone call you had with Mr. Morrison
2 in which "he went on to describe a conversation Ambassador
a
J Sondland had w'ith Mr. Yermak at Warsaw. Ambassador Sondland
4 told Mr. Yermak that the security assistance money would not
5 come until President Zelensky committed to pursue the Burisma
6 investigation. I was alarmed by what 14r. Morrison told me
7 about the Sondland-Yermak conversation. This is the first
8 time I had heard the security assistance not just the
9 Whi te House meeti ng was condi ti oned on the
l0 j nvesti gati ons. "
20 THE CHAIRMAN: And when you say that, this was the first
21 time I heard that the security assjstance not just the
22 Wh'i te House meeti ng was condi ti oned on the i nvesti gati on,
z) when you talk about conditioned, did you mean that if they
24 di dn't do thi s, the i nvesti gati ons, they weren't goi ng to get
25 that, the meeti ng and the mi 1i tary assi stance?
190
1l BY 1"IR. NOBLE:
I that ri ght?
2 A That i s cor rect.
a
J a So, I mean, did the Ukrainians have an
4 understanding at that point what they had to do in order to
5 get the funds released?
6 A Certainly l4r. Yermak did. That's what he had heard
7 f rom Ambassador Sondland.
ll A It WAS.
t2 a you had?
l3 I'd like to ask some quest'ions about that and the other
l4 interagency meetings that you had.
l5 Can you just tell us how did you participate in the SVTC
t6 on Ju1y L8th?
t7 A that i n the Whi te House, 'in
So the way i t works i s
t8 the 01d Executive 0ffice Building, there is a room, there's a
l9 series of rooms where they have interagency meetings.
20 MR. BELLINGER: I'm not sure all of this is public.
2l AMBASSADOR TAYL0R: Ah.
22 MR. BELLINGER: You guys have to scrub it later.
23 At{BASSADOR TAYL0R: Fai r poi nt. Thank you, Counselor.
I A Yes .
the room, observati ons, i nformati on
Around
2 about the value of the assi stance. In particular 0SD, I
J think it was Laura Cooper, who is probably on your list, made
4 a very strong case and continued to make a very strong case
5 for the effectiveness -- indeed, her office was the one
6 overseei ng th"is assi stance, so she made a very strong case
7 for that.
8 0thers around the State Department representative,
9 strong statement, we made a strong statement about the
l0 importance of this assi stance.
ll a And was there an OMB representative there for that
l2 meet i ng?
t4 a Okay.
t5 A Probably.
l6 a Do you recal1 whether there was any communicatjon
t7 f rom the l,rlhi or f rom Ol\4B regardi ng the f reeze and
te House
l8 whether it was going to stay in place at that meeting?
t9 A I don't. I think coming out of that meeting was
20 the instruction that we're continuing that we're
2t continuing the policy as it had been. And, probably after
22 the PCC, the State Department and maybe the Defense
9 A I think both.
l0 a Do you know whether there was any kind of written
ll documentation of kind of the decisions made at these
t2 meet i ngs?
I and I'm not sure who it came from, but it may have come
2l f or qu i te some t'ime .
20 rooti ng out corrupti on,I bel'ieve hi s number one pri ori ty,
2l but he had taken concrete steps. And yet the OMB, the
22 President, sti 11 had decided to freeze the aid purportedly
)? because he had some concerns about corruption in Ukra'ine?
24 A It is certainly true that he made he is not only
25 flghting corruption. So he changed the President Zelensky
199
Volker.
2 A Okay.
J a There's one July 24th, 2019, where Volker says:
4 Hi, 8i11. Can you talk now?
5 Do you see that?
6 A I do.
t4 A I do.
6 a 0kaY.
7 A Yeah, yeah, yeah. The State Department has alt of
8 mine. I have them as we11. But, yeah, the 5tate Department
9 has all of these.
l0 a Okay. But in this timeframe were you aware that
ll Ambassador Volker and Ambassador Sondland were in direct
t2 communication with Mr. Yermak and with Mr. Giuliani about the
l3 drafting of a statement that they wanted Pres'ident Zelensky
t4 to release?
l5 A So only after -- only after Ambassador Volker
l6 released his texts. I think that's where they showed up.
t7 a So you weren't involved, as far as you can
l8 remember, in the drafting of that?
t9 A I was not.
20 a Okay. So that was something that Ambassador Volker
2l and Ambassador Sondland were doing with Giuliani and Yermak?
22 A Yes.
J Mr. Yermak.
J convos wi th ZE.
4 That's Zelensky, co r rec t?
5 A Yes.
6 a And POTUS.
7 A Yes.
l0 a Let' s ta1k.
ll A Ri ght.
l2 a And then you go on to have a conversation, which I
l3 be1 i eve 'is the conversation you descri be i n your statement.
t4 Is that right?
15 A Yes.
l6 a 0n page L2?
t7 A Yes.
2t ri ght?
22 A That i s correct.
23 a And you understood that stalemate meant that
24 Ukrai ne would not get the mi 1 i tary assi stance?
25 A That's correct.
207
l0 A Sure.
lt a What did you mean by "the nightmare" and what would
t2 the Russians love?
13 A "The ni ghtmare" i s the scenari o where Presi dent
t4 Zelensky goes out in public, makes an announcement that he's
l5 going to'investigate Burisma and the election in 201.5,
l6 interference in 2016 election, maybe among other things. He
t7 might put that jn some serjes of investigations.
l8 But he had to he was going the nightmare was he
t9 would mention those two, take all the heat from that, get
20 himself jn big trouble in th'is country and probably in his
2t country as we11, and the security assistance would not be
I The Russi ans are leani ng on Ukrai ne. They are leani ng on
2 Ukraine about Donbas. They are leaning on Ukraine about
J sovereign small 1 i ttle soverei gn countri es here, 1 i ttle
4 statelets. They are leaning on economically, they have got
5 the Nord Stream coming through, they have got they are
6 putting pressure on they have to come to a new gas
7 agreement by the Lst of January.
8 them. And they, the Russians
So they are leaning on
9 want to know how much support the Ukrainians are going to get
l0 in general, but also what k'ind of support from the Amerjcans.
ll So the Russians are loving, would love, the humif iation
t2 of Zelensky at the hands of the Americans, and would give the
l3 Russians a freer hand, and I would quit.
t4 a And why would that make you quit?
l5 A That's exactly the scenario that I was worrjed
l6 about when I had my meeting with Secretary Pompeo on the 28th
t7 of I said: Mr. Secretary, you know, your current
May where
I there, because I'm not going to defend it, you know. I would
2 say bad things about it. And you wouldn't want me out there
J doing that.I'm going to come home on that. So that was
So
4 the message about I quit.
5 a And did you communicate that, these concerns around
6 this time to Secretary Pompeo or
7 A I had done so on August 29th.
8 a In your in the cable?
9 A Correct.
l0 a What was the di stri buti on on that cable?
ll A It was cal1ed "NoDI5. "
t2 a 0kay. What's that mean?
l3 A So i t's very limited distribution. It's also first
t4 person, which means the way it reads is: Mr. Secretary, I
l5 am concerned I Bill Taylor I am concerned about thi s
t6 problem.
t7 So that's first person. Normally these cables are not
l8 f i rst person, they are third person. So it gets attention,
2l concerned.
22 that it is very limited distribution.
And "NODIS" means
L) It goes obviously to the Secretary. And then if other people
24 want to read it they have to come up to the Operatjons Center
25 in the State Department and they can go into the special room
212
25 staffers too, I'm sure get the word much earlier than
213
I anybody el se .
2 And so i got this emai1, I think it was probably
J overnight, which I then sent to Tim Morrison and I think
4 maybe to George Kent saying: 0h, this is great news. This
5 is what we've been wal ti ng f or.
6 And Tim hadn't heard i t yet. So that's how I fj rst
7 heard. And then he tater that day confirmed.
8 a Okay. Are you aware that The New York Tjmes
9 ons, some emai 1s, relati ng to the
publ i shed some communi cati
l0
ll
t2
l3
t4
l5
l6
t7
l8
l9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
215
I 14:23 p.m. l
2 BY I,IR . NOBL E :
25 Mr. Novi kov, the other Ukrai n'ian, that i t would be a good
216
9 that.
l0 a OkaY.
ll After the freeze lifted, it sounds 1ike, from your
was
t2 statement, you sti11 had concerns that President Zelensky
l3 might go forward with the CNN jnterv'iew and stitt announce
t4 the i nvesti gatj ons. Is that ri ght?
l5 A That's ri ght.
l6 a Why did you have that concern that that was goi ng
t7 to happen?
l8 A I had the concern because I had a couple of
19 meeti ngs with President Zelensky and Andrei Bohdan, hjs Chief
20 of Staff, about this time. It was just after -- it was on
2t the L3th, I think, of September, just after the hold had be en
l
22 released.
And walking out of that meeting, Andriy Yermak was about
24 to walk in. just said to President Zelensky,
And I had
25 bipartisan support of Ukraine in Washington js your most
218
l3 A No.
t4 a No? Did you help prepare for President Trump's
l5 meeti ng wi th Presi dent Zelensky?
2t complaint.
22 A I'm sure I have it somewhere, but that's okay.
25 about now to navigate the demands that the President had made
223
I to Zetensky.
2 Does that ring any be1ls? Does anything of that sort
J A This is in the 26th meeting?
4 a Yeah.
5 A Advi ce to Zelensky about how to navigate the
6 a Demands of the Presi dent.
7 A I was i n that so the records of my records of
8 that meeti ng are 'in the State Department, and they wi 1 t come.
9 a OkaY.
l0 A I don't recall that.
lt a Okay. By that
t2 A Ah. Ah. Thank you, Counsel.
t3 He di d ask one th'ing that was i n addi ti on to the
t4 brief conversation about the call and Donbas, and it may have
l5 been at the end, President Zelensky stj11 expressed his
t6 interest in the face-to-face meeting in the 0va1 0ffjce.
t7 a OkaY.
l8 A Yeah. Thank you.
t9 a But by that point in time, from your limited
20 knowledge of what had occurred on the cal1, you didn't know
2t that the President had made any demands or there was anything
22 to navi gate.
23 A Correct.
24 a 0kay. 5o, to the extent the whistleblower
25 complaint chronjcles that and you were in the meeting, and
224
9 BY MR. CASTOR:
l4 h ave
l8 r eope ned ?
14 Swartz?
l5 A He volunteered to do that.
t6 a 0kay. And what was the feedback from Swartz?
t7 A I don't know that they ever connected.
l8 a 0kay. And was there any followup effort to close
t9 the loop with the Justice Department?
20 A No. I thought the whole thing was a bad idea.
2t a You thought it was a bad idea to reach out to Bruce
22 Swa r tz?
23 A No. I thought the idea of the Americans aski ng the
24 Ukrai ni ans to i nvesti gate a vi olati on of Ukrai ni an law was a
25 bad i dea.
226
I a Okay
I a Okay.
2 A Yeah.
t9 change in policy.
20 a Uh-huh.
2t A So, yes, I am getti ng i ncreasi ngly concerned. I 'm
22 tryi ng to get from Washi ngton what's goi ng on.
23 a And did Brechbuhl give you any jndication that he
24 was going to talk to the Secretary or he hears you loud and
25 clear --
229
I A Hears me
4 a Okay.
6 a And di d he check?
7 A I don't know. I didn't hear anythi ng back from
8 him.
9 a 0kaY.
I a Okay.
7 from another part of the NSC doing arms control, and I don't
8 know what before that
9 a So you sent the first-person cable where you
l0 mention the term "fol1y. "
ll A r did.
t2 a Did you get any feedback from the seventh floor on
l3 that cable?
t4 A i got feedback from the sixth floor on that.
l5 a 0kay. What feedback did you get?
16 A I got feedback saying, I'm glad you sent that
t7 cab1e.
18 a Okay. Did you get any feedback from the Secretary
t9 or
20 A I
dn't. I di dn't. As I say, I know he carri ed
di
2t it with hjm to one of these meetings where they were going to
22 try to reverse the decision, but no direct feedback.
23 a Okay. How about from Mr. Brechbuhl?
24 A Nope.
25 a Anybody else?
234
5 a OkaY.
t9 a 0kay.
20 A And then the focus was on UNGA, as we said, on the
2t General Assembly. And that, of course, was back into the
22 regular channels, I mean, all the preparations for that.
L) a Did any of your conversations wi th l'4orri son reveal
24 any concerns about the Giuljani-Sondland-Volker channel f rom
25 that point on?
235
I A No.
2 a Okay.
t
J A No.
9 A It doesn't.
l0 a 50, to your knowledge, you never had any
ll communications with somebody by that name?
t2 A Cor rect.
13 a Af ter the aid was released, di d you ever have a
t4 close-the-1oop session with VoIker and Sondland?
15 A About that topic?
l6 a Yes.
l7 quid pro quo was not asking. Did insist that President
l8 Zelensky go to a microphone.
l9 And then Sondland and I spoke on the phone. He said he
20 talked to President Trump. Adamant Zelensky himself had to
2t clear things up. The same comment about no quid pro quo.
22 Sondland said he talked to the President and then he talked
23 to Zelensky and Yermak after that.
24 a Uh-huh.
25 A 5o it sounds like they're talking about the same
238
I phone ca1 1 .
25 a OkaY.
240
I a Ri ght.
2 A Yeah.
J a And, as we understand it, there were Senators, you
4 know, calling the
5 A Two Senators came up. 0h. Right, right. You're
6 exactly ri ght. Senators cal1ed the Presi dent. Yes.
7 a Okay. So i t's possi ble Sondland when Sondland
8 says the Pres'ident doesn't want anything, no quid pro quo,
9 it's possible the Presjdent's reacting to the fact that he's
l0 getting some heat on this issue and he's about to lift the
ll hold.
t2 A I don't know.
l3 a Okay.
t4 A Don't know.
8 Thank you.
9 MR. I"IEAD0WS : 0kay .
7 accurate.
8 MR. MEADOWS: Okay.
20 things. But, sure, there are certai n1y holds put on forei gn
2l assi stance packages. There's no doubt about i t.
22 MR. MEADOWS: That have nothing to do w'ith our overall
23 foreign policy initiative. Have you seen that?
24 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: I don't remember, but I would not be
6 MR. JORDAN: We1l, you said you one you get there
had
7 on June LTth and you had one conversat'ion wi th the i ndi vi duat
8 who held Mr. Morrison's position at NSC You had one
9 conversati on in your first month there, and it was on
10 J uly L9th .
asked you how many conversations you had with Dr. Hill
2 between June LTth and Ju1y Lgth, you said one, and that was
3 on J u1y 19th.
4 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: And I think that's correct. And
l5 comi ng i n
l6 AMBASSAD0R TAYLOR: No, I had not met him before.
t7 MR. J0RDAN: So you'd never met him before.
l8 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: COTTCCt.
8 Dr. Kupperman and many people, as you are I'm sure aware, are
9 concerned about the Ch'inese i nterest i n buyi ng up some of
l0 Ukrainjan technology and a company ca11ed . Yes.
I BY MR. CASTOR:
23 fai r1y j uni or congressi onal staff. And I thi nk there were
24 probabty 1.5 or so congressional staffers on this trip.
25 John Herbst, Ambassador Herbst organizes these. It was
254
I a Sunday afternoon. They were just off the plane. They came
2 to my residence, and I gave them a briefing. And i t could've
J been that one of your staffers was on this, Mr. Chai rman.
4 a My question was just simPlY, You haven' t had
I wanted to
2 l'lR. ARMSTRONG: Yeah , j ust br i ef 1y.
J talking about the High Court of
You were
4 Anti-Corruption. And that was actually set up under
5 Poroshenko, but it was inactjve. And when Zelensky got
6 elected, he brought it back, right?
7 AMBASSAD0R TAYL0R: Yes, si r. " Inacti ve" i s probably
8 wel1, it wasn't put into effect. It wasn't it didn't
9 start. And the problem was, i t d"idn't have a place to meet.
l0 And so under President Poroshenko. And so people were
ll thinking that he was kind of dragging his feet.
t2 MR. ARMSTR0NG: Yeah .
14 is that the concern should not have been about the new team.
l5 Now, your point is a good one that is, they had one
l6 carryover from
t7 l"lR. ARPISTRONG: Wel I , let me ask you th'i s . Because you
18 weren't the Ambassador during the 2015 election.
t9 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: That's true.
20 MR. ARI'ISTRONG: But you were the Ambassador duri ng the
2t 2008 election.
22 AMBASSADOR I was.
TAYLOR:
23 14R. ARMSTR0NG: And if four members of the Ukrainian
8 concern me.
I [5:31 p.m.]
2 THE CHAIRMAN: We're going to go back on the record to
J try to get to as many members as we can before votes. And
4 let me start by recogni zi ng Mr. Mali nowski .
was one group of folks who felt that they didn't want to have
2 anything to do with what Mr. Bolton reportedly described as
l9 q uote .
and Zelensky was actually a big meeting with one or two dozen
2 people. Am I right?
J AMBASSAD0R TAYLOR: Probably. I was not there, but,
4 yes. Normally that's the case.
5 THE CHAIRI'IAN: So, at a bi g meeti ng 1i ke that, i t stands
t7 cou r age .
I keep my, you know, DAS Kent, the Deputy Assistant Secretary
2 George Kent, advised on at1 of these things, but it's also
3 very common for an NSC director or senior director to be
4 directly in touch.
5 And when I said it was dependent to some degree on the
6 issue, I think I mentioned that Tim Morrison, much more than
7 Fi ona Hi 11 , Dr. Hi I1 , was very ihterested i n Chi nese
24 So, when the question comes, how often are you talking
25 to well, it depends on the issue. And 1f there's any
283
J Reeke r ?
2 A Yep
8 A No.
l4 on.
l5 a Did you have any conversations with any of those
l6 staff members about any of the i ssues here today?
t7 A No. This was a briefin.g, as I say, in my
l8 residence. I gave them a briefing, and then we had an
t9 opportunity for questions and answers, and they hit 'i t off .
7 A Coutd.
8 a So would you say that, at the end of the day, that
9 P res i dent Trump got the investigations that he was pressuring
l0 Ukrai ne tor?
ll A Hasn't gotten them yet, and, of course, President
t2 Zelensky didn't have to go in front of a m'ike and say this.
l3 But Mr. but the prosecutor general did say that he was
t4 going to take a look at any or all of these cases that may
l5 have been closed for no good reasons.
l6 a A11 ri ght. So he's at least open to looking into
t7 thi s?
t"lR. JORDAN: And it's not out of the well , let me ask
2 it this way. Let's go to the first -- the first call is a
3 couple days, 3 days af ter the calt between Pres'ident Trump
4 and Pres'ident Zelensky, and you get a readout f rom
5 l'lr . 14orri son about Presi dent Trump and Presi dent Zelensky's
6 ca1l. Is that accurate? It's on page ni ne of your testjmony
7 at the top.
8 AI{BASSADOR TAYLOR: Page ni ne, let's see.
l6 the call? Was it you calling him, or did he call you to talk
t7 about this? And was this his primary focus of the cal1,
l8 giv'ing you a readout of President Trump, President Zelensky's
t9 call?
20 AMBASSAD0R TAYLOR: . I can't hazard a guess.
2t MR. J0RDAN: 0kay.
5 September 1st.
6 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: Yep.
7 MR. J0RDAN: And can you give me the particulars of this
8 call? Did he call you? Did you call him? Was jt a
9 scheduled call?
l0 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: Ah, so this was -- so he was in
ll Warsaw on September Lst, yeah.
t2 MR. JORDAN: You indicate at the bottom of the paragraph
l3 that he gives you a readout of the call that took place
l4 between President Zelensky and V'ice President Pence. Is that
l5 accu rate?
t7 Congressman.
8 says. He says he's got one client, and he's useful to the
9 client.
l0 MR. ZELDiN: And then it's your inference that
ll Mr. Gi u1 i ani 's goat would be the Presi dent's goal?
t2 AI"IBASSADOR TAYLOR: Yes .
13 MR. ZELDIN: And your source 'is The New York Tjmes?
t4 AMBASSADOR TAYL0R: Yes.
l5 |VlR. ZELDIN: So do you have any other source that the
l6 Presi dent's goal i n maki ng thi s request was anythi ng other
t7 than The New York Times?
l8 AI4BASSAD0R TAYLOR: I have not talked to the President.
t9 I have no other information from what the President was
20 th i nki ng.
2t MR. ZELDIN: Is i t possi b1e that requesti ng an
25 aga i n?
300
6 based off of what The New York Times told you Rudy Giuliani
7 was thinking, which inferred what the President was thinking.
8 I'm asking you to answer a question that, is it possjble that
9 the request to investigate the 2016 election was for a reason
l0 other than jnfluencing the 2020 election? Is that possible?
ll AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: I don't know i f i t's possi ble.
l0
ll
t2
l3
t4
l5
l6
l7
l8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
302
I [5: 30 p.m .]
4 wanted was condi ti oned on an i nvesti gati on i nto Buri sma and
5 alleged Ukrai ni an i nterference i n the 2016 U. S. electi ons.
6 Obviously you would be jdentifying at that point that it's
7 important to the President, that investigation, if you were
8 reachi ng that conclusi on?
9 AMBASSAD0R No. What I know is what what
TAYL0R:
l0 Ambassador Sondland was able to te11 me about those
lt investigations and Ambassador Volker. I don't know what was
12 i n the Presi dent's mi nd.
l9 MR. ZELDIN: And you testi fied earlier that Mr. you
t9 told me.
20 firsthand knowledge that
MR. ZELDIN: Did you have any
21 confi rms that the Presi dent was cond'i ti oni ng an i nvesti gati on
22 i nto Buri sma and alleged electi on Ukrai ni an i nterference
2 i n the U. S. i nterest.
J Alt'IBASSAD0R TAYL0R: Don' t know, Congressman.
4 I believe you might have testifjed
l4R. ZELDIN: And
5 earlier, U.S. 1aw conditions aid to Ukraine based off of
6 thejr efforts to make progress in fighting corruption,
7 co r rec t?
t2 Ye rmak .
l3 Yes, it
with Morrison.
was
t4 MR. ZELDIN: Tim l4orrison. Is he your only source of
l5 information?
t6 AMBASSADOR TAYL0R: Yes.
t7 MR. ZELDIN: Was he in that meeting? Was he part of
l8 that conversation with between Ambassador Sondland and
l9 14r. Yermak?
20 AMBASSADOR TAYL0R: I don't know.
2t I'4R. ZELDIN: We11, how would 14r. Morri son know that
22 'inf ormati on i f he wasn't i n the meeti ng?
firsthand or secondhand?
4 MR. ZELDIN: But i t's not you r f -rr sthand. So best case
5 scenari o i t's your secondhand i nformati on, but maybe i t's
6 thi rdhand information.
7 0n your calt with Tim Morrison after the Juty 25th call
8 between President Trump and President Zelensky, d'id he te11
9 you anything in his readout other than the reference to
l0 anything else specifically from the call other than the
ll reference to fi re Lutsenko?
t2 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: Yes. He mentioned I think it was
J a mistake.
4 MR. ZELDIN: That was never actually communicated to
5 Ukrai ne; correct?
6 AI{BAS SADOR TAYLOR: No, I think that is what he
7 communi cated to Ye rmak .
2t
22
23
24
25
314
1 [5:46 p.m . ]
23 Okay, 5teve.
24 BY MR. CASTOR:
J You sent your cable. You know, you had a couple phone
4 calls wi th Mr. Brechbuhl. But 'i t doesn't seem 1j ke your
5 concerns penetrated.
6 A l'lr . Castor, I don' t thi nk that's true. I thi nk
7 that, first of all, they shared my concerns. Second of all,
8 they got my cabIe. Third of all, based on the concerns and
9 the cab1e, Secretary Pompeo went to the White House, probably
l0 on a couple of occasions, you know, in trying to have these
ll meetings, and attempted to get the decision changed. So I'm
t2 comfortable --
l3 O OkaY.
2 now
4 i nbox wi th the
5 MR. CASTOR: 0h, okay. Yeah, I mean, I don't have my
6 emai 1.
7 BY MR. CASTOR:
2 a Okay.
l5 a wlth other
Have you had any communications
l6 w'itnesses or 1ike1y witnesses before this investigation, such
t7 as Mr. l4orrison? Presumabty he's sort of on the docket next
l8 to come jn. Have you had any conversations about your
l9 testi mony wi th other possi ble wi tnesses?
25 A No.
3'18
I A Correct.
2 a 'is i t accurate that the statement, the
And so
J opening statement, that you gave is based on your very best
4 recollection after reviewing your own notes?
5 A It is correct.
6 a 0kay. And so is that the most accurate recitation
7 of events that you can remember today? Is
8 A It'is.
9 a that ri ght?
l0 A It is.
ll a When Mr. Zeldin was questioning you, he was tatking
t2 about the connection he was sort of conflating a couple
13 thi ngs between Mr. Gi u1 i ani , Mr. Trump, and the New York
t4 Tjmes article. I just want to clarify a couple of things for
l5 now.
2t i nvesti gati ons 'into B j den and the 2015 electi on?
22 A Correct.
23 a And that was before you took the job.
24 A It WaS.
25 a Okay.
320
I R'ight. Yes.
2 a And, subsequently then, you in early September had
J two separate phone cal1s, right, with Tim Morrison and
4 Ambassador Sondland about a phone call between Ambassador
5 Sondland and President Trump?
6 A Cor rect. And both
7 a Ri ght?
8 A Yes.
2t a Ri ght.
22 AI don't remember h'im saying President Trump said
23 that they had to be linked.
24 a Right. But you understood Ambassador Sondland was
25 speaki ng regularly
aaa
4 a Ri ght.
5 And then you also had your own conversations with
6 Ukrajnian officjals about Rudy Giulianj, right? And'if I
7 could refresh you, because it's late, you, I think, testified
8 that on Ju1y LOth, when you had your meeting with the Chief
9 of Staf f and the Def ense l'lj ni ster, they relayed to you that
l0 they understood that Mr. Giuf iani had said that there would
ll not be a phone ca1l.
t2 A Ah. Yes. Yeah, that's exactly ri ght. And that
l3 came through the Prosecutor General Lutsenko. Yes.
t9 A Correct.
20 a just to be clear, who ulti mately deci des
And
2t whether or not there is a White House meeting between the
22 Presi dent of the United States and any other foreign leader?
23 Is it Rudy Giuliani, or is it the President of the United
24 States?
25 A It's the Pres'ident of the Uni ted States
324
I a 0kay.
2 MR. G0LDMAN: ust L mi nute.
J
l0 proceedi ngs.
l1 AMBASSADOR TAYLOR: Unless he has questions.
t2 THE CHAIRMAN: No, no. We are adjourned. And I want to
t3 thank you, Ambassador.
t4 AMBASSAD0R TAYL0R: Thank you, Mr'. Chairman.
l5 [Whereupon, at 7:00 p.m. , the deposi tion was concluded. ]
t6
t7
18
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25