Consider that I've been studying common law for over 3 years.

Consider that I have always improved on my legal writings (notices).

Consider that when I showed one of my notices to a guy who has been teaching
common law for 20 years.......he then pulled my legal notice apart within 15
seconds of looking at it.

Consider that 3 months of work went into that notice to "fine-tune" it and that I
considered it was very acceptable work.

Consider that I saw my own faults within 5 seconds of exposure to the flaws I had
introduced but never noticed.

OK...stop considering now.....and I will explain what was told to me about

Jurisdiction and how the game is played, only I have created a playful anecdote to
help you understand the problems we all face with jurisdiction and the courts.

There are two fields side by side. On one field, some Humans are playing Rugby
whilst a few Referees keep an eye on things and blow a whistle when someone breaks
a rule. On the other field, a different game is being played, its called Soccer, and if
you are caught holding the ball with your hands a Referee most definately blows his
whistle and calls for a PENALTY.

What isn’t realised is that the boundary line between the two fields is not clearly
identified and whilst you have no idea of where the Soccer Pitch starts and the Rugby
Pitch ends, the REFS DO.

Ok, so as a Human, you start by playing Rugby and you are happy running whilst
holding the ball in your hands, as allowed by the rules of the game. You run a little
wide, and by mistake end up crossing over onto the Soccer Pitch, whilst still holding
the ball of course.

Suddenly a REF blows his whistle, calls HAND-BALL and awards a PENALTY
AGAINST YOU !!!

You are not happy with this outcome and you most certainly wish to take it up with
the REF who blew the whistle on you. You are now in conflict and because you
want a good answer as to why he awarded a penalty against you, your path takes you
right up to the REF. You start blurting out a rule from the Rugby Rules Book to
show that you were in fact allowed to handle the ball. The REF screams at you saying
he's not going to allow you to bring an Rugby Rules Book onto a Soccer Pitch where
a game called "Soccer" is being played.
You shout over to the REF on the Rugby Pitch, but he does not answer your call. Oh
sure he can hear you, but chooses to ignore you because you voluntarily left the
Rugby game to go and play Soccer. As far as he is concerned, you no longer enjoy
the privileges and benefits provided by playing that game, because you are now on a
different field where a totally different game with a totally different set of rules is
enforced. As far as he is concerned, DEAL WITH IT. Take the decision made by the
Soccer REF and do it quickly otherwise your situation could worsen and most likely
will as history will show to be true.

Now lets see how this plays out in the REAL WORLD.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 was created by the Powers To
Be (P2B), to show the world (after WWII), that this planet needed a big kick in the
ass, that all humans should have some very powerful an inalienable rights such as
Life, Freedom, and Security of person "without slavery in any of its forms” and
without racism and without political and/or religious conviction.

Have a read:- http://www.udhr.org/UDHR/default.htm

This was an illusion then and it has never changed, it is still an illusion; a euphoric
and idealistic one at that. The truth is, they offered this up with the left hand whilst the
right hand was offering up other legislations which YOU VOLUNTARILY accepted
and contracted with, thus giving up some valuable inalienable rights for some weak-
ass benefits offered by the P2B to lure you over onto the Soccer Field.

Here's how:-

1) They created an illusion that you were required to pay TAX in order to keep your
society running smoothly. Failure to voluntarily register for a tax file number would
enact a penalty TAX at a rate of 50% of all your earnings from the day you start
working until the day you retire. Everyone volunteered to enter into the TAX system
by requesting a Tax File Number (TFN), so they could accurately record how much
income you earned; in order that they could apply a larger taxation levy against you.

2) The P2B created an illusion that you were required to apply for a driving licence to
prove you could drive a car safely and with considerations to other road users.
Failing to comply with the Road Rules they enforced (and that you acquiesced to)
would result in a monetary penalty, but as long as you "obeyed the rules" these
penalties would not apply to you and it would keep the undesirables off the road, so
again the illusion was very easily swallowed and accepted as the “normal way”.

3) The P2B eventually went electronic with the banking, but in any way they created
the illusion that to save was good for you, good for your family and its security and
good for the community. They also created the illusion that to own your own home
was to own your own castle. The mere fact that on your mortgage contract the
mortgagee is identified as theTENANT of the property may have escaped your
attention, even the implication that being named as theTENANT means you couldn't
possibly OWN the property, but either way you'll need a bank account to conduct
such transactions. Also remember a SLAVE can never OWN any property and this
includes DEBT SLAVES… so get used to it, your tax donations are required by the
Banksters because they have a big hole in their ship and it needs plugging.

4) The P2B created the illusion that you were most likley going to need Hospitals and
medical procedures so they created an illusion of a government sponsored health
system to give certain protections to the citizens of this society. Oh yeah, you'll have
to voluntarily apply for a Medicare Card and other similar forms from time to time.

5) Library Cards, Shooters Licences, Heavy Goods Drivers Licences, Fishing

Licenses, Life Insurance and Health Insurance (both illusionary and should be re-
named DEATH INSURANCE and SICKNESS INSURANCE), and the education
system must have to be re-named the Fool System and not School System.

I am sure you get the picture by now as to why they offered up such a beautiful and
euphoric declaration of Human Rights, because they knew in advance that you
were likely to opt for all these wonderful benefits traded for real inalienable
rights, which you, without full disclosure being evident, gave up in order to recieve
these wonderful illusionary benefits.

The FACT IS REVEALED:- YOU VOLUNTARILY BECAME A DEBT SLAVE

and whilst you might not like it, you reflect on how well the "system" is looking after
you and when a monetary penalty comes along for not indicating when turning a
corner, or being 5 minutes late with your PARKING CONTRACT...well you
obviously grumble, whinge and complain, but under threat of an even bigger
monetary penalty they OFFER YOU FOR YOUR FAILURE TO HONOUR
YOUR FICTIONLAND OBLIGATIONS, you buckle, fold and pay.

Those of you who have taken up the good cause to keep these bastards honest by
learning common law and writing legal notices are wasting your time. The system has
a steam roller on this soccer field and if you try to introduce your knowledge of
Rugby Rules, and even more so your skills at reading the much bigger 1100 page
Annotated Rugby Rules by Quick and Garran, then again, your pitiful screams can
hardly be heard from underneath the steam roller as your nose is flattened against the
mud.

How do they get away with this?......easy.....

If you are not trained in legal practice and have passed the B.A.R. EXAM, then you
are not qualified to give ANY LEGAL OPINION. Even if you quote precedents, High
Court Rulings, Legislation from the past or recent times, how could you, a LAY
PERSON possibly have any COMPREHENSION of legalese and proper arguments.
Your legal writings are practically a waste of time.

They give you a few options to bring your words into court. An AFFIDAVIT and a
STATUTORY DECLARATION. The Affidavit is your truthful opinion of some
event or fact, and you are asked to swear before a JP that your opinion is truthful as
far as your comprehension permits. The STAT DEC comes with an ACT OF
PERJURY (enforced if your version of truth is found to be flawed). PERJURY also
comes with a custodial sentence in some cases, so affidavits are conveniently
suggested to better protect your person. How kind of them.

Affidavits, whilst sworn under oath before a JP are STILL YOUR OPINIONS of
events and because you have no legal training, you can't possibly have full
comprehension of what your are talking about or trying to explain on paper.

Stat Decs are something REAL MEN AND WOMEN can make, and I'm not talking
about your FICTIONAL ENTITY, otherwise known as the STRAWMAN here, I'm
talking about the flesh and blood sentient soul. Trouble is it is a known fact that two
things cannot be brought into any Admiralty Court; they are:-

(1) THE TRUTH..........(2) FACT

Of course they do not inform you that you are a soccer player on a soccer pitch in
front of a soccer REF, and he simply cannot accept either truth or fact into a court.
Don't believe me, then try getting an AMICUS CURIAE onto the bench and watch
the robes fly as the magistrate abandons ship.....lol

This was further explained to me recently with a neat little play on the rules by Bill
Clinton.

Remember he was caught with his trousers down...(literally)…and Monica Lewinsky

later revealed in public that the PRESIDENT was doing the naughty deed and the
public believed her. Clinton was impeached for breach of oath, because he stated
that he did not have sex with Lewinsky and the people believed he was lying;
something a PRESIDENT just wouldn't do… Yeah Right !!!

CLINTON is a lawyer, and he knows how the game is played, so knowing he was
going to be asked about his affairs with Ms Lewinsky, he baited the Prosecutor with
questions to which he already had perfect answers for; most likley planted by Clinton
in collusion with the Attorney General.
Q1. Did you have sex with Monica Lewsinsky?

A1. NO

Q2. Do you know what SEX is?

(This question was asked, because Clinton could not give an accurate answer if he did
not know what sex truly was....so as a matter of fact, this question most clearly
ascertains if he was of knowledge as to what sex is, to further validate his answer).

A2. WHAT IS .........IS.

The Judge almost immediatley declared that Clinton had no case to answer and
immediately dismissed the charges...Clinton walked free.....integrity intact.....WTF
just happened?

CLINTON brought a DEFINITIVE TRUTH INTO AN ADMIRALTY COURT.

WHAT IS....IS happens to be a PURE TRUTH and as stated earlier you are not
allowed to bring truth into any Admiralty Court. Once presented the robes had to fly,
the Judge had to escape this evil called truth, but in order not to draw attraction...he let
Clinton WALK.....

DO YOU GET IT YET......?.....

As for the Origine People's struggle for recognition of their Sovereign Status, I
now understand why this Sovereignty issue has to be taken to a WORLD PEOPLE’S
COURT..... because the TRUTH is EVIL to the Admiralty Court and simply
cannot be heard, plus how can you ask any Australian Judge to play Russian Roulette
(with 6 bullets in the chamber) against his own system of (in)justice?

Now you know the game, do you want to learn the remedy?

It's simple, get back on the Rugby Field.

How?..... revoke all existing and time-expired contracts with the system.
Hand back the measly benefits that the P2B offer, and claim back your valuable and
inalienable HUMAN RIGHTS.
Enjoy life, enjoy working for your own existence and put food in your families
mouths before you feed the taxman and government.
Do not walk this path with one foot on the Soccer pitch and the other on the Rugby
Pitch. You are either a human being with inalienable rights, or you enjoy the
privileges and benefits of being a debt slave.
Remember, you can't walk both paths. You have to learn how to live as a HUMAN,
and after generations of indoctrination you have to re-wire your thought processes.

Watch, Listen, Learn, then engage brain.

Take heed, only the truly motivated should follow these guidelines and in any case,
the author of this writing has no legal training what so-ever and this advice can only
be construed to be thought provoking and educational fun. If you want to get serious,
then you had better start learning how to defend yourself; in court or out of court,
because no lawyer can help you as a HUMAN, get used to that very clear fact.

Written by Rob Crombie … Truth Seeker