Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Residential Status
Page 1 of 13
(b) He/she has been in India for a total period of 365 or more
days in the last 4 years preceding the previous year and has
been in India for at least 60 days in the previous year.
Page 2 of 13
(a) The date entered into the continuous Discharge Certificate
in respect of joining the ship by the said individual.
(b) The date entered into the continuous Discharge Certificate
in respect of signing off by that individual from the ship in
respect of such voyage.
Resident in India
Page 3 of 13
previous year. Otherwise, his/her status will be ‘Non-resident in
India’ subject to two exceptions narrated earlier.
A Resident Individual satisfying both the additional conditions will
be ‘Resident and Ordinarily Resident in India’ and an individual who
does not satisfy both the additional conditions, his/her status will be
‘Resident but not ordinarily resident in India’
Page 4 of 13
❖ RESIDENTIAL STATUS OF A COMPANY
A company is said to be resident in any previous, if-
• It is an Indian company. An Indian company is a company
which have been registered in India under Companies Act
1956 or Companies Act 2013.
• If its place of effective management (POEM) is in India.
Page 5 of 13
Passive Income
Passive Income is the aggregate of the following –
Page 6 of 13
b) does, in substance, make the key management and
commercial decisions necessary for the conduct of the
company’s business as a whole.
2. If a board has, de facto, delegated the authority to make the
key management and commercial decisions for the company
to the senior management or any other person including a
shareholder, promoter, strategic or legal or financial advisor,
etc., and does nothing more than routinely ratifying the decisions
that have been made, the company’s place of effective
management will ordinarily be the place where these senior
managers or the other person make those decisions.
3. A company’s board may delegate some or all of its authority
to one or more committees such as an executive committee
consisting of key members of senior management. In these
situations, the location where the members of the executive
committee are based and where that committee develops and
formulates the key strategies and policies for mere formal
approval by the full board will often be considered to be the
company’s place of effective management.
4. The location of a company’s head office will be a very
important factor in the determination of the company’s place of
effective management because it often represents the place
where key company decisions are made.
5. The use of modern technology impacts the place of effective
management in many ways. It is no longer necessary for the
persons taking decision to be physically present at a particular
location. Therefore, physical location of board meeting or
executive committee meeting or meeting of senior
management may not be where the key decisions are in
substance being made.
Page 7 of 13
6. The decisions made by shareholder on matters which are
reserved for shareholder decision under the company laws are
not relevant for determination of a company’s place of effective
management. Such decisions may include sale of all or
substantially all the company’s assets, the dissolution, liquidation
or deregistration of the company, the modification of the rights
attaching to various classes of shares or the issue of a new class
of shares etc. These decisions typically affect the existence of the
company itself or the rights of the shareholders as such, rather
than the conduct of the company’s business from a
management or commercial perspective and are, therefore,
generally not relevant for the determination of a company’s
place of effective management.
7. Day to day routine operational decisions undertaken by junior
and middle management shall not be relevant for the purpose
of determination of POEM.
8. The determination of POEM is to be based on all relevant facts
related to the management and control of the company, and is
not to be determined on the basis of isolated facts that by itself
do not establish effective management, as illustrated by the
following examples –
- The fact that a foreign company is completely owned by an
Indian company will not be conclusive evidence that the
conditions for establishing POEM in India have been satisfied.
- The fact that there exists a Permanent Establishment of a foreign
entity in India would itself not be conclusive evidence that the
conditions for establishing POEM in India have been satisfied.
- The fact that one or some of the directors of a foreign company
reside in India will not be conclusive evidence that the conditions
for establishing POEM in India have been satisfied.
- The fact of, local management being situated in India in
respect of activities carried out by a foreign company in India
will not, by itself, be conclusive evidence that the conditions for
establishing POEM have been satisfied.
Page 8 of 13
- The existence in India of support functions that are preparatory
and auxiliary in character will not be conclusive evidence that
the conditions for establishing POEM in India have been satisfied.
In case the Assessing Officer proposes to hold a foreign
company, on the basis of its POEM, as being resident in India,
then any such finding shall be given by the Assessing Officer after
seeking prior approval of the collegium of three members
consisting of the Principal CITs or CITs, as the case may be, to be
constituted by the Principal Chief Commissioner of the region
concerned, in this regard. The collegium so constituted shall
provide an opportunity of being heard to the foreign company
before issuing any directions in the matter.
❖ Example
Mr. A is a foreign citizen, not being a person of Indian origin.
Determine his residential status for the assessment year 2019-20 on
the assumption that during financial years 2004-05 to 2018-19 he
was present in India as follows-
YEAR NO. OF DAYS YEAR NO. OF DAYS
2004-05 221 2011-12 160
2005-06 22 2012-13 96
2006-07 50 2013-14 286
2007-08 72 2014-15 100
2008-09 130 2015-16 182
2009-10 340 2016-17 85
2010-11 30 2017-18 280
2018-19 86
SOLUTION-
For the assessment year 2019-20, Mr. A is a resident and ordinarily
resident because-
Mr. A is a resident in India because it can be seen that that Mr. A
had been in India for more than 365 days in the previous four years.
Page 9 of 13
Mr. A is ordinarily resident because he has been resident in India for
9 years in the last 10 years as for being an ordinarily resident a
person needs to be a resident in India for at least 2 years in the last
10 years, but Mr. A has been resident for 9 out of 10 years.
Mr. A also satisfies the condition that an individual need to be in
India for at least 730 days in the last 7 years. Mr. A has been in India
for 1189 days in the last 7 years.
Therefore, Mr. A is a resident and ordinarily resident for the
assessment year 2019-20.
Page 10 of 13
❖ FOREIGN INCOME
If the following conditions are satisfied, then income is said to be
foreign income-
1. income is not received (or deemed to be received) in India; and
2. income does not accrue or arise (or does not deem to accrue or
arise) in India
Page 11 of 13
❖ TAX PLANNING TIPS
The following should be kept in mind while planning for tax-
1. In order to enjoy non-resident status, individuals, who are
visiting India on a business trip or in some other connection,
should not stay in India for more than 181 days during one
previous year and their total stay in India during any four
previous years preceding the relevant previous year should in
no case exceed 364 days.
2. If any individual, have been staying in India for more than 365
days during four years preceding the relevant previous year,
wish to stay in India for more than 60 days, they should plan
their visit in India in such a manner that their stay in India falls
under two previous years.
3. An Indian citizen or a person of Indian origin (whether
rendering services outside India or not) can stay for a
maximum period of 181 days on a visit to India without losing
his non-resident status. If, however, such persons wish to stay
in India for more than 181 days, they should plan their visit in
such a manner that their maximum stay of 362 days falls under
two previous years, stay in each previous year not being more
than 181 days.
4. An Indian citizen, leaving India for the purpose of
employment, will not be treated as resident in India, unless he
has been in India in that year for 182 days or more. In other
words, Indian citizens going abroad for the purpose of
employment can stay in India for 181 days without becoming
resident in that year, even if they were in India for more than
365 days during the four preceding years.
5. A non-resident can escape tax liability in respect of income
earned out of India if he first receives it out of India and then
remits the whole or part of it to India, even though the business
is controlled from India.
6. A person who is not ordinarily resident, earning income outside
India from a business controlled outside India, can avoid tax
liability if he first receives such income in a foreign country and
Page 12 of 13
then remits the whole or part of it to India, either in the same
year or in the following years.
7. Not ordinarily resident persons can claim set off losses
sustained in the business controlled outside India against their
income taxable in India, provided they shift their control of the
business to India.
REFERENCES
(1)
https://www.taxmann.com/bookstore/bookshop/bookfiles/sampl
echapterunit2lesson4.pdf
(2)
https://resource.cdn.icai.org/46234bos36354p4secAcp2.pdf
(3)
https://resource.cdn.icai.org/46234bos36354p4secAcp2.pdf
Page 13 of 13