Sie sind auf Seite 1von 7

Waste Management 29 (2009) 2722–2728

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Waste Management
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/wasman

Production of lightweight aggregate from industrial waste and carbon dioxide


Peter J. Gunning *, Colin D. Hills, Paula J. Carey
Centre for Contaminated Land Remediation, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, United Kingdom

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: The concomitant recycling of waste and carbon dioxide emissions is the subject of developing technology
Accepted 28 May 2009 designed to close the industrial process loop and facilitate the bulk-re-use of waste in, for example, con-
Available online 4 July 2009 struction. The present work discusses a treatment step that employs accelerated carbonation to convert
gaseous carbon dioxide into solid calcium carbonate through a reaction with industrial thermal residues.
Treatment by accelerated carbonation enabled a synthetic aggregate to be made from thermal residues
and waste quarry fines. The aggregates produced had a bulk density below 1000 kg/m3 and a high water
absorption capacity. Aggregate crushing strengths were between 30% and 90% stronger than the proprie-
tary lightweight expanded clay aggregate available in the UK. Cast concrete blocks containing the carbon-
ated aggregate achieve compressive strengths of 24 MPa, making them suitable for use with concrete
exposed to non-aggressive service environments. The energy intensive firing and sintering processes tra-
ditionally required to produce lightweight aggregates can now be augmented by a cold-bonding, low
energy method that contributes to the reduction of green house gases to the atmosphere.
Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction Treatment by ACT can be applied to calcium and magnesium


rich thermal residues, e.g. municipal and paper incineration ashes,
New treatment methods that can convert waste into products wood ashes, pulverised fuel ashes, steel slags, etc. (Li et al., 2007;
reduce the amount of materials sent to landfill disposal and protect Fernández-Bertos et al., 2004; Johnson, 2000). Carbonation is
virgin raw materials for the future. achieved by exposing the waste to an elevated concentration of
Annual waste production in the UK amounts to 335 million ton- carbon dioxide gas in a controlled environment. The reaction takes
nes (DEFRA, 2007). Mining and quarrying wastes comprise 29%, place in the presence of moisture and carbon dioxide gas hydrates
whilst industrial processes are responsible for a further 13%. Land- to form carbonic acid (1). In saturated conditions, carbonation is
filling has been widely used, but as space is due to run out in less suppressed by the slower diffusion of carbon dioxide in water com-
than a decade. Despite increased recycling, large amounts of waste pared to air (Van Balen, 2005). The carbonation of hydrated Port-
are not effectively reused. These include incineration residues land cement, converts Portlandite (2) and Calcium Silicate
which are often classified as hazardous on account of their alkalin- Hydrate (3) into carbonate. Unhydrated calcium oxide and silicates
ity and heavy metal content. Typically, these ashes must be land- also form carbonates (Sulapha et al., 2003; Jiang et al., 2000). These
filled, and are subject to landfill taxation which is set to rise from phases are typically found in many thermal residues (Johnson,
£40 in 2009, up to £48 in 2010 (DEFRA, 2008). 2000) and can combine with significant amounts of carbon dioxide
Similarly, the need to improve carbon management has gas in a short timescale
prompted industry to consider the mitigation of emissions using
CO2 þ H2 O () H2 CO3 ð1Þ
Carbon Capture and Storage schemes (CCS) at both the larger and
smaller scale, but concerns have been raised over long term envi- CaðOHÞ2 þ H2 CO3 ! CaCO3 þ 2H2 O ð2Þ
ronmental impacts (I.P.C.C., 2005). Finding a safe, permanent stor-
age solution for carbon dioxide remains a major challenge. One 3CaO  2SiO2  3H2 O þ H2 CO3 ! CaCO3 þ 2SiO2 þ 6H2 O ð3Þ
option, particularly suited to smaller CO2 point-source emissions
involves the use of Accelerated Carbonation Technology (ACT) to Leachates generated from carbonated alkaline media have pH’s
bind carbon dioxide into solid carbonate using naturally reactive that are typically lowered by several units, and the formation car-
materials such as wastes arising from thermal processes. bonate results in an increase in density and mass. The hardened,
densified product can have potential for re-use in engineering
applications (Rendek et al., 2006; Johannesson and Utgenannt,
2001). Combining ACT with a method of making agglomerates al-
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 (0)2083317570. lows waste to be reconstituted into a lightweight aggregate (Gun-
E-mail address: gp45@gre.ac.uk (P.J. Gunning). ning et al., 2008; Padfield et al., 2004).

0956-053X/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.021
P.J. Gunning et al. / Waste Management 29 (2009) 2722–2728 2723

Agglomerating (pelletising) processes are used to increase the 2. Materials and methods
grain size of powders, by sticking particulates together with a li-
quid binder and mechanical agitation, such as by tumbling in a re- 2.1. Raw materials
volving drum. Particle bonding can only take place when the pores
are almost totally saturated with liquid binder, to form liquid The quarry fines were sourced from an active quarry producing
bridges between particles (Iveson and Litster, 1998). The perma- around 1 million tonnes of crushed limestone annually. Process-
nent bonding of particles can be aided by the use of a chemical bin- ing the crushed rock generates 200,000 tonnes of waste in the
der to improve handling and flow properties (Pietsch, 2003; form of poor quality sands and silts. A range of thermal residues
Pottmann et al., 2000). The pelletising process is controlled by were trialled as potential binders (Table 1). The wastes were
the physio-chemical properties of the input powder, the moisture sourced from facilities in the UK, and included biomass ash, ce-
content of the feed and process parameters such as rotation speed ment bypass and kiln dusts (CBD and CKD), municipal waste
(Wang and Cameron, 2002; Iveson et al., 2001; Baykal and Doven, incineration bottom and fly ashes (MSWI-BA and MSWI-FA) from
2000). two different incinerators, four paper ashes from separate mills,
The UK currently consumes around 280 million tonnes of aggre- pulverised fuel ash (PFA), sewage sludge ash (SSA) and wood
gate annually, 25% of which is derived from secondary and recycled ash. The chemistry of the wastes were examined using X-ray
sources (WRAP, 2008). Virgin aggregates are subject to the Aggre- fluorescence (Philips PW1400) (Table 2) and X-ray diffraction
gate Levy, which is currently £2 per tonne produced. As recycled (Siemens D500) (Table 3).
aggregates are exempt from this tax and natural stone resources
are becoming scarce, there is increasing interest in the use of alter- 2.2. Accelerated carbonation
native materials (H.M. Revenue and Customs, 2009). Recycled
aggregate can be sourced from spent construction materials The reactivity of the wastes with carbon dioxide was measured
including lightweight concrete (Tam et al., 2005). Aggregates with in a pressurized reaction vessel. The oven-dried wastes were
a bulk density below 1200 kg/m3 are classified as lightweight, moistened with 10% water, and carbonated in a 100% carbon diox-
which are commonly manufactured by pelletising and by sintering ide atmosphere held at 2 bar for 24 h. This process was repeated
or firing (BS EN 13055: 2002). These energy intensive processes until the wastes were fully carbonated. Carbonate content was
form low-density solid pellets by particle fusion and bloating the determined by thermogravimetry (Stanton–Redcroft STA-780 Ser-
structure (Owens, 1993). ies analyser). Complete carbonation was determined when the
The objective of the present study was to examine the use of an mass lost between 800 °C and 950 °C, remained constant (Heiri
accelerated carbonation process to reconstitute quarry waste and et al., 2001). The loss equates to the weight of carbon dioxide
CO2-reactive thermal residues into a material suitable for use as chemically combined in the material (according to 4)
an aggregate, and the demonstration of the technology at pilot- Heat
scale. CaCO3 ! CaO þ CO2 ð4Þ

Table 1
Waste material descriptions.

Waste Description
Biomass ash Fine ash residues from the incineration of plant matter from agricultural processes (Pitman, 2006)
Cement kiln/bypass dusts Alkali-rich fine dusts removed from cement kiln exhaust gasses (Buchwald and Schulz, 2005)
Municipal solid waste incineration fly and Produced from the incineration of domestic waste. Bottom ash is the coarse grained residue from the incinerator grate. Fly ash
bottom ashes is the fine grained airborne ash removed from the incinerator exhaust gasses (C.I.W.E.M., 2001; E.A., 2002)
Paper wastewater sludge incineration ash Fine ash residue from incineration of paper making wastewater sludge containing residual fibres, and a mixture of fillers
(kaolin, calcite) and chemicals (bleaching agents, de-inking compounds) (WRAP, 2007; Boni et al., 2004; DOE, 1996)
Pulverised fuel ash Fine grained ash separated from the flue gases of coal-fired power stations (CIRIA, 1999; DOE, 1995a)
Sewage sludge ash Fine ash generated by incinerating dewatered domestic wastewater sludge (DOE, 1995b)
Wood ash Coarse ash derived from combined heat and power plants using sustainable wood sources (Pitman, 2006)

Table 2
Chemical analyses (% oxide) of waste materials.

Al2O3 CaO Fe2O3 K2O MgO Na2O P2O5 SiO2 SO3


Biomass ash 0.3 24.2 0.7 21.2 8.8 0.3 36.0 5.1 3.3
CKD 4.6 46.2 2.9 3.9 1.5 0.5 0.1 16.4 22.3
CBD 4.4 66.3 2.7 1.7 1.1 0.3 0.1 17.8 4.6
MSWI-BA 14.5 33.1 7.9 1.1 2.8 2.2 1.9 5.2 27.9
MSWI-FA 15.8 32.1 3.4 0.8 3.4 1.8 2.9 32.4 3.6
Paper ash 1 19.0 45.0 1.1 1.0 5.3 1.2 0.4 25.0 0.8
Paper ash 2 5.5 60.0 1.7 0.2 1.4 0.3 0.7 23.8 5.1
Paper ash 3 6.8 69.6 1.0 0 1.7 0 2.0 10.0 7.0
Paper ash 4 8.8 67.4 0.9 0.04 2.1 0 1.6 15.5 2.0
PFA 23.0 1.3 13.8 2.7 1.0 0.5 0.5 55.6 0.1
Quarry fines 4.2 38.2 3.8 1.2 1.1 0.1 0.4 50.1 0.3
SSA 11.2 14.8 5.6 2.3 2.9 0.7 21.2 39.9 0.3
Wood ash 2.6 45.5 1.3 14.0 6.9 0.9 9.0 17.0 0.6
OPC 5.2 64.5 3.5 0.2 2.2 0.1 0 19.8 2.9

OPC – Ordinary portland cement.


2724 P.J. Gunning et al. / Waste Management 29 (2009) 2722–2728

Table 3
Calcium bearing phases present before and after carbonation as identified by XRD.

Phase Biomass ash CBD CKD MSWI-BA MSWI-FA Paper ash 1 Paper ash 2 Paper ash 3 Paper ash 4 PFA Quarry fines SSA Wood ash
Calcite d d d d d d d d d d d
Gehlenite d d d d d
Lime s s d s s s
Phosphate d d
Portlandite d s d s d s s s
Whitlockite d

s – Present in uncarbonated material, d – Present in uncarbonated and carbonated material.

By measuring the carbon content of the untreated waste, the 2.4. Pilot-scale trials
amount of CO2 combined through accelerated carbonation can be
calculated by difference. The mechanics of a laboratory experiment are rarely indicative
of a full-scale industrial process (Schaafsma et al., 1998). To dem-
2.3. Laboratory scale pelletising trials onstrate the application of the process, a pilot-scale facility capable
of producing 100 kg of LWA per hour was constructed (see Fig. 1).
Wastes having a significant reaction with CO2 were defined as The quarry fines, thermal residue binder, and water were pre-
those that imbibed 5% or more of their dry weight of carbon diox- mixed in a 50 l pan mixer (Utranazz), conveyed to rotary carbon-
ide. These materials had potential to self-cement and bind the non- ation reactor (see Fig. 2), and then discharged into a 1100 l curing
reactive quarry fines into pellets. Quarry fines were mixed with chamber circulated with dehumidified CO2 for seven days. Dehu-
these wastes, and with Portland cement as a reference binder, at midifying the gas allows the CO2 to be circulated in a closed loop,
10, 20, 30, 40 and 50% by dry weight. Water was added and mixed without the wastage of venting to the atmosphere. For comparison,
into the material until it attained the consistency of firm dough. a sub-sample of the aggregate was allowed to carbonate through
This material was pelletised in a drum pelletiser under a flow of natural weathering for seven days.
carbon dioxide gas at ambient temperature and pressure. After Aggregate testing was conducted according to BS EN 1744
pelletising, the aggregates were stored in a curing chamber under (chemical tests), BS EN 13055 (mechanical tests) and BS EN 1097
a flow of dry carbon dioxide for 72 h. The dry CO2 helps to over- (physical tests). Concrete cubes were prepared and tested accord-
come the detrimental effect of the saturated pore network caused ing to BS EN 12390 Parts 1–3. Mixes were prepared according to
by agglomeration. Carbonation effectively stops when the material the recommended mix design for lightweight concrete incorporat-
is saturated and only proceeds when it has dried sufficiently to al- ing Lytag aggregate (Lytag, 2004).
low CO2 ingress (Cultrone et al., 2005). Pellets were impregnated with resin, sectioned, and polished for
European Standards tests for measuring compressive strength analysis by scanning electron microscopy (JEOL JSM5310LV fitted
of lightweight aggregate are unsuitable for small batch sizes. An with an EDAX spectrometer). The accelerating voltage was 20 kV
alternative method of measuring aggregate particle strength has and the working distance was 15 mm.
been investigated by a number of authors (Arslan and Baykal,
2006; Cheeseman et al., 2005; Li et al., 2000). In the approach
adopted here, the mean particle diameter was derived by taking 3. Results and discussion
three axial measurements, prior to crushing in a compression-test-
ing rig. The strength of carbonated pellets (in MPa) was calculated 3.1. Waste characterisation
using (5), according to the method described by Li et al. (2000):
In accordance with the earlier work of Johnson (2000), carbon
Fc Fc dioxide uptake can often be estimated with reference to the total
rc ¼ ¼ ð5Þ
Am ðp d2m Þ oxide content for calcium, as determined by XRF analysis (see
4
Fig. 3). Phase analysis by XRD (see Table 3) attributes high reactiv-
Where rc is the compressive strength in megapascals, Fc is the frac-
ity to the presence of lime (calcium oxide) and Portlandite (calcium
ture load in kilonewtons, Am is the mean area of the pellet, and dm is
hydroxide). The relationship shown is not linear, and this can be
the mean diameter of the pellet.
attributed to the presence of non-reactive calcium bearing phases.
Three commercial lightweight aggregates; Aardelite (auto-
The presence of calcite (calcium carbonate) in the thermal wastes,
claved PFA), LECA (lightweight expanded clay aggregate), and Ly-
suggests that atmospheric carbonation may have occurred at some
tag (sintered PFA), were tested alongside the manufactured
point prior to the materials being dried, stored and analysed. The
aggregates for comparison.
prevalence of Portlandite in the wastes indicates some degree of

Fig. 1. Schematic of the pilot-scale process.


P.J. Gunning et al. / Waste Management 29 (2009) 2722–2728 2725

Fig. 2. Pilot-scale rotary carbonation reactor.

hydration. Hydration may occur as ashes are often conditioned ashes generated in the UK are derived from low calcium, superior
with water to reduce dust during transportation. coals, resulting in low reactivity class F ash, dominated by the alu-
Paper ashes were some of the most reactive wastes examined minosilicate mineral mullite (DOE, 1995a). Calcium present in
due to the addition of calcium carbonate in the papermaking pro- sewage sludge ash is predominantly bound in the non-reactive cal-
cess. Paper waste incineration results in the calcination of carbon- cium phosphate mineral whitlockite.
ate to calcium oxide. Depending upon the type and grade of paper
being thermally treated, the lime content in the ash may vary 3.2. Laboratory pelletising trials
widely (Walker, 2006).
Cement by-products often contain lime produced by calcination Wastes reacting with greater than 5% w/w CO2 were tested for
of the limestone feedstock. Cement Kiln Dusts exhibit lower reac- binding quarry fines into pellets. Aggregates, typical of those
tivity as they are separated during the preheating stage of the ce- formed when paper ash was used as a binder, are shown in Fig. 4
ment production process, when the temperature is not sufficient to alongside the raw materials.
induce full calcination. Bypass dusts, tend to be more reactive as The binding strength of these materials was variable (see Fig. 5).
they have passed through the kiln firing stage (Sreekrishnavilasam Portland cement (used as the control binder) produced the stron-
et al., 2006; Singh et al., 1995). gest pellets. Cement kiln dust, wood ash and paper ash 3 produced
The low reactivity wastes had little or no detectable levels of pellets of comparable strength to proprietary lightweight ex-
lime or Portlandite. MSWI composition is highly variable, depend- panded clay aggregate (LECA) and Aardelite, thus making them
ing upon the nature of the feed to the incinerator, and include me- potentially suitable as binders.
tal, plastic and putrescible waste (Arickx et al., 2006; Bethanis Paper ash 3 showed binding potential, as previously demon-
et al., 2002). Biomass ash composition varies widely according to strated in an investigation of its hydraulic properties (Bai et al.,
the nature of the plant matter being incinerated (Pitman, 2006) 2003). The close proximity of large amounts of quarry fines to
and XRD analyses revealed that the ash has a complex mineralogy, the site of the paper incinerator facilitated their choice as the
dominated by calcium and magnesium phosphates. Pulverised fuel two materials for inclusion in the pilot-scale production trials de-
scribed below.

3.3. Pilot Scale Production

The testing of the pilot-scale carbonated pellets according to


British Standards established their suitability for use as lightweight
aggregates (see Table 4).
Commercial lightweight aggregates exhibit differing bulk densi-
ties and strengths. The properties required for LWA are generally
end-use specific (BS EN 13055: 2002). LWA’s can be classified by
their low bulk density and low strength, for ‘insulation’ applica-
tions, with medium density and strength for ‘blockwork’ produc-
tion, and high density and strength for ‘structural’ use (IStructE,
1987).
By increasing the reactive binder content in the aggregates, and
by accelerating the carbonation process, the compressive strengths
obtained were increased. The resistance to freezing and thawing
was also improved. Compressive strengths were typically higher
than that of LECA and Aardelite (blockwork LWA), but lower than
Fig. 3. Maximum weight gain upon carbonation against calcium oxide weight. Lytag (structural LWA). Increasing the reactive ash content also re-
2726 P.J. Gunning et al. / Waste Management 29 (2009) 2722–2728

Fig. 4. Raw materials: (a) paper ash, (b) quarry fines, and (c) pelletised product.

Fig. 5. Strength of quarry fines pelletised with different binders.

Table 4
Pellet testing results.

30% ash 30% ash 50% ash 50% ash Lytag LECA Aardelite
Natural ACT Natural ACT

Acid soluble sulfate (%) 0.23 0.23 0.28 0.28 ND 60.5* ND


Apparent density 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 1.7 1.0 2.1
Bulk density (kg/m3) 890 920 820 850 730 350 720
CO2 Uptake (%/ weight) 3.9 4.6 7.3 8.3 – – –
Freeze–thaw (% disintegration) 12.3 10.4 8.9 3.2 3.8 4.3 10.5
pH 11.6 11.6 11.9 11.7 8.8 6.2 8.9
Strength (MPa) 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.43 0.09 0.09
Total sulfur (%) 0.08 0.07 0.1 0.1 ND 60.32* ND
Water absorption (%) 25 26 28.6 27.8 18 30.3 21.2
Water soluble chloride (%) 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 ND 60.04* ND
*
Values quoted by Maxit Group (2008), ND = not determined.

duced the apparent and bulk densities in the weathered pellets. tent should not exceed 0.1% of dry mass of mortar (BS EN 998-2:
However, accelerated carbonation resulted in an increase in den- 2003) or 0.2% of the mass of cement in concrete containing pre-
sity, due to carbonate formation. However, the ACT aggregates re- stressed steel reinforcement (BS EN 206-1: 2000).
mained well below the specified bulk density limit for LWA of Accelerated curing of the aggregate enhanced carbonate forma-
1200 kg/m3 (BS EN 13055: 2002). tion (see Table 4), which is evident by scanning electron micros-
Elevated levels of sulphur and chloride can lead to the degrada- copy (see Fig. 6). Pellets allowed to naturally carbonate exhibit
tion of concrete. Sulphates react with hydrated Portland cement low-density structures, with discrete mineral grains of gehlenite
forming expansive minerals, which result in distortion and crack- (silicate containing aluminium and calcium) embedded in a fine,
ing. Chlorides cause the passive oxide layer on steel reinforcing porous groundmass of calcium carbonate. Artificial carbonation
bars to break down, leading to corrosion (Mehta and Monteiro, caused a noticeable densification of the structure, as the fine
2006). Levels of sulphur and chloride in the aggregate were below groundmass was replaced by a solid mass of calcium carbonate.
the published values for LECA (Maxit Group, 2008), and within the These structures may account for the enhanced strength and
limits specified in British Standards. BS EN 13139: 2002 limits total freeze–thaw durability of aggregates subjected to artificial
sulphur to 1% by weight of the mortar product, whilst chloride con- carbonation.
P.J. Gunning et al. / Waste Management 29 (2009) 2722–2728 2727

Fig. 6. BSE image of (a) accelerated carbonated pellets; 1. calcium carbonate mass, (b) naturally carbonated pellets; 2. fine crystals of calcium carbonate, 3. gehlenite crystals.

Table 5
Density and compressive strength of concrete cubes.

30% ash 30% ash 50% ash 50% ash LECA Lytag
Natural ACT Natural ACT
28 day strength (Mpa) 21 18.5 24 23 22 28
Density (kg/m3) 2020 2020 1970 2000 1570 1840
Exposure class X0 X0 XC1 XC1 XC1 XC2

3.4. Aggregate end uses 4. Conclusion

Lightweight aggregates are utilised in a diverse range of appli- A range of combustion residues have been examined for use as
cations including lightweight structural concretes, low-density CO2-reactive binders in combination with quarry fines for the pro-
construction blocks, engineering fill and horticultural growing duction of an accelerated carbonated aggregate. The carbonated
mediums (Chandra and Berntsson, 2003). aggregates produced had comparable properties to commercially
The carbonated aggregates were incorporated into concrete available LWA’s.
cubes, intended for use as pre-cast lightweight concrete blocks. The ACT aggregates produced in this study were composed of
Concrete cubes made from the ACT aggregate and commercial 100% waste and were formed by a cold-bonding process. This pro-
LWA were tested for density and 28 day compressive strength duction route imbibes CO2 gas unlike the fired or sintered aggre-
(see Table 5). The cubes exhibited a satisfactory mode of fracture, gates available commercially.
as specified in BS EN 12390. All four exposed faces were cracked A pilot-scale production plant was successfully used to produce
approximately equally, with minimal damage to the faces in con- carbonated aggregate for commercial trials and European Stand-
tact with the compression machine platens. Fractures were propa- ared testing. It was established that the key properties of the car-
gated through the aggregate particles, rather than around the bonated aggregate were comparable to or better than equivalent
pellets, indicating good bonding with the cement paste. proprietary LWA currently available in the UK.
British Standard (BS 8500-1:2006) allocates concrete to expo- Carbonated aggregates were tested for use in concrete blocks
sure classes based upon compressive strength. Exposure classes and as a horticultural growing medium in green roof systems.
recommended the severity of the service environment to which The technology described here is now being used to manufacture
the concrete is subjected. Although the strength of the 30% ash- aggregate from other waste materials. Full-scale trials are planned
bound aggregate fell short of the proprietary aggregate, it was still to provide the foundation for the commercial production of accel-
suitable for X0 applications, where concrete without reinforcement erated carbonated aggregates for use in, for example lightweight
can be used in non-aggressive environments (BS 8500-1:2006). block production.
ACT aggregate bound with 50% ash was comparable to LECA con-
crete, and was suitable for use in XC1 applications, where concrete Acknowledgements
containing reinforcing is either maintained in a permanently wet
or dry state, but not subjected to the cyclical stresses of wetting This work was carried out as part of a Ph.D. project supported
and drying. The greater strength of Lytag concrete (XC2 class) per- by the Knowledge Transfer Network for Resource Efficiency and
mits burial in wet soil, but not exposure to wetting and drying cy- the EPSRC (G03303113) in conjunction with Gallagher (Aggre-
cles. Therefore, carbonated aggregate blocks would be ideally gates) Ltd. The help of Martin Hobbs of Gallagher (Aggregates)
suited for internal partition walls as an alternative to foamed Ltd. is gratefully acknowledged.
concrete.
The accelerated carbonated aggregate product has been References
supplied for a pilot-scale green roof trial in the south-east
of England. These vegetated roofs offer improved aesthetics Arickx, S., Van Gerven, T., Vandecasteele, C., 2006. Accelerated carbonation for
treatment of mswi bottom ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials B137, 235–243.
and building insulation properties, and profound environmen- Arslan, H., Baykal, G., 2006. Analyzing the crushing of granular materials by sound
tal benefits. In this application, a lightweight, absorbent med- analysis technique. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 34, 1–7.
ium is required to support plant growth without placing an Bai, J., Chaipanich, A., Kinuthia, J.M., O’Farrell, M., Sabir, B.B., Wild, S., Lewis, M.H.,
2003. Compressive strength and hydration of wastepaper sludge ash–ground
excessive load on the roof structure (Johnston and Newton, granulated blastfurnace slag blended pastes. Cement and Concrete Research 33,
1997). 1189–1202.
2728 P.J. Gunning et al. / Waste Management 29 (2009) 2722–2728

Balen, Van, 2005. Carbonation reaction of lime, kinetics at ambient temperature. I.P.C.C., 2005. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: Summary for Policymakers and
Cement and Concrete Research 35 (4), 647–657. Technical Summary. <www.ipcc.ch/activity/ccsspm.pdf>.
Baykal, G., Doven, A.G., 2000. Utilization of fly ash by pelletization process; theory, IStructE (Institution of Structural Engineers), 1987. Guide to the Structural Use of
application areas and research results. Resources, Conservation and Recycling Lightweight Aggregate Concrete.
30, 59–77. Iveson, S.M., Litster, J.D., 1998. Liquid-bound granule impact deformation and
Bethanis, S., Cheeseman, C.R., Sollars, C.J., 2002. Properties and microstructure of coefficient of restitution. Powder Technology 99 (3), 234–242.
sintered incinerator bottom ash. Ceramics International 28, 881–886. Iveson, S.M., Litster, J.D., Hapgood, K., Ennis, B.J., 2001. Nucleation, growth and
Boni, M.R., D’Aprile, L., De Casa, G., 2004. Environmental quality of primary paper breakage phenomena in agitated wet granulation processes: a review. Powder
sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials B108, 125–128. Technology 117, 3–39.
BS 8500-1, 2006. Concrete – Complimentary British Standard to BS EN 206-1. British Jiang, L., Lin, B., Cai, Y., 2000. A model for predicting carbonation of high-volume fly
Standard Institute. ash concrete. Cement and Concrete Research 30, 699–702.
BS EN 1097, 1996. Tests for Mechanical and Physical Properties of Aggregates. Johannesson, B., Utgenannt, P., 2001. Microstructural changes caused by
British Standard Institute. carbonation of cement mortar. Cement and Concrete Research 31, 925–931.
BS EN 12390, 2000. Testing Hardened Concrete. British Standard Institute. Johnson, D.C., 2000. Accelerated carbonation of waste calcium silicate materials. Sci
BS EN 13055, 2002. Lightweight Aggregates – Part 1: Lightweight Aggregates for Lecture Series. Society of Chemical Industry.
Concrete, Mortar and Grout. British Standard Institute. Johnston, J., Newton, J., 1997. Building Green: A Guide to Using Plants on Roofs,
BS EN 13139, 2002. Aggregates for Mortar. British Standards Institute. Walls and Pavements. The London Ecology Unit.
BS EN 1744, 1998. Tests for the Chemical Properties of Aggregates – Part 1: Li, Y., Wu, D., Zhang, J., Chang, L., Wu, D., Fang, Z., Shi, Y., 2000. Measurement and
Chemical Analysis. British Standard Institute. statistics of single pellet mechanical strength of differently shaped catalysts.
BS EN 206-1, 2000. Concrete Part 1: Specification, Performance, Production and Powder Technology 113, 176–184.
Conformity. British Standards Institute. Li, X., Bertos, M.F., Hills, C.D., Carey, P.J., Simon, S., 2007. Accelerated carbonation of
BS EN 998-2, 2003. Specification for Mortar for Masonry Part 2: Masonry Mortar. municipal solid waste incineration fly ashes. Waste Management 27, 1200–
British Standards Institute. 1206.
Buchwald, A., Schulz, M., 2005. Alkali-activated binders by use of industrial by- Lytag, 2004. Lytag Technical Manual. <http://www.lytag.co.uk>.
products. Cement and Concrete Research 35 (5), 968–973. Maxit Group, 2008. <http://www.maxit-group.com> (accessed 24.07.2008).
C.I.W.E.M (Chartered Institute of Water and Environmental Management), 2001. Mehta, K.P., Monteiro, P.J.M., 2006. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties and
Factsheets: Waste Incineration. Materials, third ed. McGraw-Hill Ltd., New York.
Chandra, S., Berntsson, L., 2003. Lightweight Aggregate Concrete: Science, Owens, P.L., 1993. Lightweight aggregate for structural concrete. In: Clarke, J.L. (Ed.),
Technology and Applications. William Andrew Publishing Inc., Norwich, New Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete. Spon Press.
York, USA. Padfield, A.M., Carey, P.J., Hills, C.D., Poole, A.B., 2004. Reuse of quarry fines in
Cheeseman, C.R., Makinde, A., Bethanis, S., 2005. Properties of lightweight aggregate production of secondary aggregates. Engineering Sustainability 157, 149–154.
produced by rapid sintering of incinerator bottom ash. Resources, Conservation Pietsch, W., 2003. An interdisciplinary approach to size enlargement by
and Recycling 43, 147–162. agglomeration. Powder Technology 130, 8–13.
CIRIA (Construction Industry Research and Information Association), 1999. The Pitman, R.M., 2006. Wood ash use in forestry – a review of the environmental
Reclaimed and Recycled Construction Materials Handbook. Part 21: Pulverised impacts. Forestry 79, 563–588.
fuel ash (PFA). Pottmann, M., Ogunnaike, B.A., Adetayo, A.A., Ennis, B.J., 2000. Model-based control
Cultrone, G., Sebastian, E., Huertas, M.O., 2005. Forced and natural carbonation of of a granulation system. Powder Technology 108, 192–201.
lime-based mortars with and without additives: mineralogical and textural Rendek, E., Ducom, G., Germain, P., 2006. Carbon dioxide sequestration in municipal
changes. Cement and Concrete Research 35 (12), 2278–2289. solid waste incinerator (MSWI) bottom ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials 128,
DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2007. Waste Strategy 73–79.
for England 2007. <http://www.defra.gov.uk> (accessed 23.12.08). Schaafsma, S.H., Vonk, P., Segers, P., Kossen, N.W.F., 1998. Description of
DEFRA (Department for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs), 2008. What agglomerate growth. Powder Technology 97, 183–190.
Happens to Waste? <http://www.defra.gov.uk> (accessed 23.12.2008). Singh, N.B., Bhattacharjee, K.N., Shukla, A.K., 1995. Effect of alkali bypass dust on the
DOE (Department of the Environment), 1995a. Industry Profile: Power Stations hydration of granulated blast furnace slag blended cement. Cement and
Excluding Nuclear Power Stations. Concrete Research 25, 883–892.
DOE (Department of the Environment), 1995b. Industry Profile: Sewage Works and Sreekrishnavilasam, A., King, S., Santagata, M., 2006. Characterization of fresh and
Sewage Farms. landfilled cement kiln dust for reuse in construction applications. Engineering
DOE (Department of the Environment), 1996. Industry Profile: Pulp and Paper Geology 85, 165–173.
Manufacturing Works. Sulapha, P., Wong, S.F., Wee, T.H., Swaddiwudhipong, S., 2003. Carbonation of
E.A. (Environment Agency), 2002. Solid Residues from Municipal Waste Incinerators concrete containing mineral admixtures. Materials in Civil Engineering 15, 134–
in England and Wales. Environment Agency Report. 143.
Fernández-Bertos, M., Simons, S.J.R., Hills, C.D., Carey, P.J., 2004. A review of Tam, V.W.Y., Gao, X.F., Tam, C.M., 2005. Carbonation around near aggregate regions
accelerated carbonation technology in the treatment of cement-based materials of old hardened concrete cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research 35,
and sequestration of CO2. Journal of Hazardous Materials 112, 193–205. 1180–1186.
Gunning, P.J., Hills, C.D., Carey, P.J., 2008. Production of lightweight aggregate from Walker, J.C.F., 2006. Primary Wood Processing Principles and Practice. Pulp and
industrial waste and carbon dioxide. In: Proceedings of the Second International Paper Manufacture. Springer, Netherlands (Chapter 13).
Conference on Accelerated Carbonation for Environmental and Materials Wang, F.Y., Cameron, I.T., 2002. Review and future directions in the modelling and
Engineering. Rome (Italy), 1–3 October, 2008. control of continuous drum granulation. Powder Technology 124, 238–253.
H.M. Revenue and Customs, 2009. FAQ: Aggregate Levy. <http://customs. WRAP (Waste Resource Action Plan), 2007. A New Approach to Paper Mill Sludge.
hmrc.gov.uk>. <http://www.wrap.org.uk>.
Heiri, O., Lotter, A.F., Lemcke, G., 2001. Loss on ignition as a method for estimating WRAP (Waste Resource Action Plan), 2008. WRAP Aggregate Programme. <http://
organic and carbonate content in sediments: reproducibility and comparability www.wrap.org.uk/downloads/WRAP_Aggregates_Programme_2_.fae713b7.4078.
of results. Journal of Palaeolimnology 25, 101–110. pdf>.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen