Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Good morning ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my name is Abby Greenfield and it is my
privilege to represent Bear in this case before you today.
You have heard the prosecutor explain what she hopes will be proven, but she did not tell you
ALL the facts.
The prosecutor has explained that my client was “identifies” as the murderer, but in fact there are
no eyewitnesses to the supposed crimes. Most of the prosecution’s evidence is not substantial nor
concrete. Rather the evidence is based off assumptions.
The prosecutor has explained that my client was found with the hat that rabbit was wearing, but
the hat is actually Bear’s.
The prosecutor has stated that my client acted suspensions when questions, but this statement
was made to a non-authoritative individual, who has not been seen since the day of the supposed
crime.
So, I ask that you keep an open mind and listen to ALL the evidence, and return a verdict of “not
guilty”
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIONS
Relevance – question/answer not related to case
Lacks Foundation – no previous questions, just thrown out
Lacks Personal Knowledge – witness testifies on something they did not directly
observe
Creation of a Material Fact – witness made a factual error in testimony OR
question extends the scope of the statement
Improper Character Evidence – character evidence (general personality traits)
used to show how a person acted in a specific situation
Hearsay – witness testifies about a statement made by another individual to prove
if it is true/false
Bear
• Why didn’t you notice that Rabbit had your hat during your first encounter?
o Where you distraught over losing your hat?
• When you realized that Rabbit had your hat, did you suspect that he stole it?
o Did Rabbit have a reputation of stealing?
o Is Rabbit capable of stealing your hat?
▪ Bears can be intimidating with height
• What happened when you confronted Rabbit?
o Did you talk it out?
o Did he leave?
▪ Why?
▪ Why didn’t you tell anyone?
o How did you get your hat back?
• When you were approached by Squirrel, why did you act nervous?
Arresting Officer
• What led you to arrest Bear?
o Was there physical evidence?
o Was there an eyewitness?
• Was there anyone else at the scene when you arrested Bear?
o NO – who made the report? What happened to Squirrel?
o YES – Correct me if I am wrong, but the Chipmunk made the report?
▪ DISAGREE - who made the report? what happened to Squirrel?
▪ AGREES – Funny, because according to my records, Squirrel
made the report. NO FURTHER QUESTIONS
• Was there a confession?
o Before or after his rights were read to him?
• NO CONFESSION, NO EYEWITNESSES, NO DNA, what do you have to
incriminate my client??
My theory
• My PROPOSAL
o There is no way that Rabbit could have committed the crime alone, or
at all.
o Squirrel knew that Rabbit had a hat, but no one else knew that
▪ How?
▪ Squirrel committed the crime
• Pinned it on Rabbit, since there is a previous criminal
history
o Explains when Rabbit was nervous the first time
Bear talked to him
▪ Didn’t want to be arrested for a crime he
didn’t commit
o Now you are wondering how that fits in with the disappearance of
Rabbit
• Rabbit confessed to Bear that he did not steal the hat
o He was afraid of the animal that original committed the crime
▪ Pleaded with Bear to forgive him
▪ Rabbit knew that the thief could hurt him
o Bear helped Rabbit
▪ Bear helped Rabbit disappear
▪ Rabbit never told Bear who the thief was
• Bear became skeptical of all animal
• When Squirrel questioned him about where Rabbit was,
Bear became nervous and lied, except he is not a good
liar.
o Played out in Squirrels favor because he could
claim the Bear killed Rabbit
o Squirrel can continue his search for Rabbit without
looking suspicious
• Squirrel knocked out two birds with one stone – get rid of Rabbit and pin it
on Bear
o No one would ever suspect a thing
• Squirrel was the one who reported Bear, but quickly fled the scene
o He hasn’t been seen since
o Coincidence?
o My Questions
▪ Where is squirrel?
▪ How did he know about the hat?
▪ What is his connection to Rabbit?
▪ Now that the court has revealed Rabbits location, is he safe?
CLOSING STATEMENT
Suppose you picked up this morning’s newspaper and your life was a front-page
headline… and everything they said was accurate… but none of it was true.
Your face plastered on every magazine for a crime you did not commit. The worst
part, you are being accused based on assumptions instead of facts.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, today you heard multiple stories; a theft, a
murder, a disappearance, and a third party. Now you are left with the task of
deciding which is true.