Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
METAL-MATRIX COMPOSITES
Features
Properties
Typology and applications
CERAMIC-MATRIX COMPOSITES
Toughening of composites
Typology and applications
CARBON-CARBON COMPOSITES
Pyrolytic carbon
Properties
Applications
Oxidation protection
METAL-MATRIX COMPOSITES
Particle-reinforced MMC are isotropic and most properties are controlled by the
matrix. Particle reinforcement modifies properties up to a certain extent. They can
processed and machined using techniques similar to those employed for
unreinforced metals. This lead to limited cost.
PARTICLE-REINFORCED
FIBER-REINFORCED
Bicycle frame
16!
12!
cBN! area of interest!
10!
8!
6!
Ag!
Cu!
SiC!
4!
Al!
2! Al-SiC & Cu-Mo!
0!
Si! GaAs!
0! 5! 10! 15! 20! 25!
Cables for power transmission lines: Al reinforced with Al2O3 fibers have
replaced steel cables for power transmission lines because of the lower density,
higher strength (1.5 GPa) and lower thermal expansion coefficient.
Al-Al2O3
Ceramic materials are the only choice for high temperature structural applications
(> 1100ºC). But their use is impaired by their inherent brittleness.
critical defect size a⇤
a 250 b
Ti alloys
200
Specific strength
[MPa/(Mg m–3)]
C-SiC
150
TiAl alloys
SiC-SiC
ed from arjournals.annualreviews.org
100 Ni base
alloys Oxide
50 Mo-Si-B
For personal use only.
Mg Al Refractory alloys
alloys alloys
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Temperature (K)
TOUGHENING MECHANISMS in CMC
Two brittle materials lead to ... however, more brittle materials may lead to ...
another brittle material a damage tolerant material
ZrSiO4 + BN + C + SiC
ZrSiO4 + SiC
TOUGHENING MECHANISMS in CMC
2836 Journal of the American Ceramic Society—Sun et al. Vol. 81, No. 11
the lowest Y:Al ratio exhibited a steady-state fracture tough- vations. "c values were ∼60°, ∼70°, and ∼75° for compositions
ness of ∼7.0 MPa!m1/2, while composition C with the highest A, B, and C, respectively. Apparently, the interface between
Y:Al ratio exhibited a high fracture toughness value of about the large elongated grains and the surrounding glass was more
9–11 MPa!m1/2. The differences in the steady-state toughness
along different orientations were not significantly large be-
SiC+SiC(C)
readily to debond and had a lower interfacial debonding energy
in samples processed with higher Y2O3:Al2O3 ratios in the
cause the texture was not strong, as shown in Section III(1). sintering additives. With increasing "c, the amount of large
In situ SEM observation of cracks interacting with the mi- elongated grains involved in the toughening process, where the
crostructures revealed that the interfacial debonding behavior crack intersects at angles smaller than "c, should be signifi-
between the large elongated grains and the intergranular glass cantly increased. This is consistent with in situ SEM observa-
varied with the sintering additives employed. As shown in Figs. tions that the overall extent of crack deflection and crack bridg-
6(a) and (b), when the crack approached the reinforcing grains ing which occurred during crack extension increased from
at similar angles of incidence (" ∼ 60°), the large elongated compositions A to C with increasing Y:Al ratios. According to
grain in sample A failed transgranularly while crack deflection previous work on whisker-reinforced ceramic-matrix compos-
and interfacial debonding occurred in sample B. When the ites, increases in both the amount of reinforcement and the
crack approached the reinforcing grains at smaller angles of extent of debonding length result in better fracture resistance.19
incidence (Figs. 6(c) and (d)), interfacial debonding occurred in Unlike ‘‘conventional’’ self-reinforced silicon nitride with a
both samples A and B. However, the debonding lengths were coarsened microstructure in which the fracture resistance was
longer in sample B than those in sample A. The critical improved at the expense of strength, the seeded silicon nitrides
debonding angles ("c), beyond which no crack deflection could investigated here all exhibited exceptionally high flexure
occur at the interface, were estimated from in situ SEM obser- strength, as summarized in Table I. The achievement of both
PYROLYTIC CARBON
Pyrolytic carbon is similar to graphite, but with some covalent bonding between its
graphene sheets as a result of imperfections. It is produced by pyrolysis (heating a
hydrocarbon nearly to its decomposition temperature in an inert atmosphere).
Pyrolytic carbon usually has a single cleavage plane, similar to mica, because the
graphene sheets crystallize in a planar order, as opposed to graphite, which forms
microscopic randomly-oriented zones. Because of this, pyrolytic carbon is highly
anisotropic.
Pyrolytic C has very high thermal conductivity, along the cleavage plane, very low
CTE, is ablative and self-lubricant between the graphene sheets. It maintains its
properties up to very temperature (2800ºC) in absence of oxygen.
PROPERTIES OF CCC
CCC are the only option as structural materials for very high temperature
applications that require extraordinary dimensional stability, thermal shock resistance
APPLICATIONS
Disk brakes of airplanes and trains because of their high wear resistance
due to ablative character, high-thermal conductivity, low friction coefficient and low
density
Protection strategies