General provision as to inquiry and trial

S .S Jain Subodh Law College

“General provision as to inquiry and trial”

SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:

Mr Zeeshan Suryaveer singh rathore

FACULTY OF : ROLL NO. :- 40

CrPc 9 SEMESTER
 General provision as to inquiry and trial

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pg.No
Declaration 3
Acknowledgement 4
Certificate 5
Research methodology 6
 Aim
 Objective
 Scope and limitation
 Source of data
 Method Of Writing
 Mode Of Citation
Case Laws 7/8
Introduction 9/10
Main Body:

Conclusion 22
Bibliography 23
 General provision as to inquiry and trial

DECLARATION

I, Suryaveer singh rathore , do hereby declare that, this dissertation titled “General
provision as to inquiry and trial” is an outcome of the research conducted by me under
the guidance of Mr. Zeeshan (asst. prof. of law) at S. S. Jain Subodh Law college in
fulfillment for the award of the degree of B.A. LLB at the university of Rajasthan.
I also declare that, this work is original, except where assistance from other sources has
been taken and necessary acknowledgement for the same have been made at
appropriate places. I further declare that, this work has not been submitted either in
whole or in part, for any degree or equivalent in any other institution.

DATE: 10.10.2017

PLACE: S.S.Jain Subodh College

Suryaveer singh rathore

 General provision as to inquiry and trial

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I acknowledge with profundity, my obligation to almighty god and parents for giving me the grace to

accomplish my work, without which this project would not have been possible.

I express my heartfelt gratitude to my respectful faculty, Mr. Zeeshan for providing me with valuable

suggestions to complete this dissertation.

I am especially grateful to all my faculty members of S. S. Jain Subodh Law College who have helped

me imbibe the basic research and writing skills.

Lastly, I take upon myself, the drawback and limitations of this study, if any.

DATE: 10 OCT 2017

PLACE: S.S. Jain Subodh College

Suryaveer Singh Rathore

 General provision as to inquiry and trial

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the dissertation titled “General provision as to inquiry and trial” submitted by
Suryaveer Singh Rathore in fulfillment for the award of the degree of B.A. LL.B. at S.S. Jain Subodh Law
College is the product of research carried out under my guidance and supervision.
 General provision as to inquiry and trial

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

AIMS :The project is an endeavor to accomplish a detailed study of the Inquiry and trial. The aim of the
project is to present a detailed study of “inquiry and trail” Through decisions statutes, amendments,
suggestions, and different writings and articles. Aim of the project is to study and analysis the laws

relating to mandamus.

OBJECTIVE : It intended to define and amend the existing laws and not to introduce any new principle.
It applies only to voluntary transfers. It provides a clear, systematic and uniform law for the transfer of

immovable property.

SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS: The scope of the project extends to study of general provision of inquiry
and trail .I tried to explain the present day position of laws in the context while discussing the various
provisions of law regarding the same. The project is based on doctrinal method of research a field
work on this topic is impossible. I have mainly used the textbook relating to the subject and the bare
act. Moreover internet is used to obtain web articles and write ups and bare act. Due to the lack of
expertise and constraints I had to use secondary sources to do the research work which is the
limitation of work.

SOURCES OF DATA:

 Books

 Journals

METHOD OF WRITING : The method of writing followed in the course of this project is both analytical

and descriptive

MODE OF CITATION : The researcher has followed a uniform mode of citation throughout the course

of this research paper

 General provision as to inquiry and trial

INTRODUCTION

INQUIRY
The word ‘inquiry’ means to include everything done in a case by a Magistrate whether the case has
been challenged or not. It does not always mean a judicial inquiry. The word “inquiry must be
distinguished” from “investigation” under Chapter XIV on the one hand and a “trail” on the other. A
“trail” is a judicial proceeding which ends in conviction or acquittal. All other proceedings are inquiries
which have various endings according to circumstances.

TRAIL
The term “trial” has not been defined in the Code. It is the examination and determination of a cause
by a judicial tribunal which has jurisdiction over it. It is a judicial proceeding which ends in conviction or
acquittal but not discharge
 General provision as to inquiry and trial

Inquiry
i. Literal Meaning of Inquiry

a. Research

b. Interrogation

c. Investigation

ii. Meaning of Inquiry

a. Any proceedings conducted by Magistrate

b. Any proceedings conducted by a Court

iii. Definition u/s 4(1)(k) Cr.P.C

“Inquiry includes every inquiry other than a trial conducted under this code by a magistrate or Court”.

(iv) Object of Inquiry

Determination of truth

(v) Kinds of Inquiry

a. Departmental Inquiry

b. Judicial Inquiry

(vi) Inquiry vs Trial

Inquiry is the proceeding which may be prior to trial.

(vii) Authority to conduct Inquiry

Magistrate or Court
 General provision as to inquiry and trial

INQUIRY

According to S. 2(g)”inquiry” means every inquiry, other than a trial, conducted under this Code by a
Magistrate or Court.
Section 159 of the Code empowers a Magistrate on receipt of a police report under Section 157,
Cr.P.C. to hold a preliminary inquiry in order to ascertain whether an offence has been committed
and, if so, whether any persons should be put upon their trial.

In cases triable by the court of sessions and commitment proceedings take place before a Magistrate,
which are in the nature of an inquiry preparatory to sending the accused to take his trial before the
Court of Session.

The Magistrate in such cases is bound either to discharge the accused or commit him for trial, but he
has no power to declare an accused either guilty or innocent of the offence with which he is charged.

An inquiry is also by a Magistrate in cases triable by himself under S. 202 of the Code. On a
complaint being filed before a Magistrate, he examines the complainant and the witnesses on oath in
order to find out whether there is any matter which calls for investigation by a criminal court.

The Magistrate may not act on the complaint and dismiss it if he distrusts the statements of the
complainant and the witnesses and the result of the ‘investigation or inquiry does not establish
sufficient ground for proceeding. All these proceedings are in the nature of inquiry.

Case – The word Inquiry has been defined u/s 2 (g), Cr.P.C. It is evident from the Provision that every
Inquiry other than a trial conducted by the Magistrate or Court is an Inquiry. No specific mode or
manner of inquiry is provided u/s 20, of the code. In the inquiry envisaged u/s 202, Cr.P.C. examination
of the complainant only is necessary with the option of examining the witnesses present, if any.

This exercise by the Magistrate, for the purpose of deciding whether or not there is sufficient ground
for proceeding against the accused, is nothing but an Inquiry envisaged u/s 202.
An inquiry is basically a proceeding wherein the magistrate or court applies the judicial mind and the
purpose of such judicial mind is to determine whether further proceedings moving towards the trial
shall be taken or not. Inquiry as a stage of criminal process commences with the cognizance taken by
 General provision as to inquiry and trial

magistrate u/s 190. However the filing of complaint or the police report whereupon the magistrate
applies his mind on the point whether he shall take cognizance or not will also be deemed to be a
part of the stage of inquiry. The inquiry proceedings moves uptill the stage of commencement of
charge framing. Thereafter with the charge of framing the trial process starts. During an inquiry some
important proceedings that can be taken place in the inquiry.

For Example :
1. Taking of Cognizance
2. Complaint proceeding
3. Dismissal of complaint
4. Issue of process
5. Handing over of documents
6. Fixation of date for 1st hearing etc.

TRIAL
 General provision as to inquiry and trial

Trial
i. Literal meaning of Trial

a. Attempt

b. Examination by a test

c. Judicial examination or investigation

ii. Meaning of Trial

The judicial proceedings conducted by Court.

iii. Commencement of Trial

Trial starts after submission of challan till announcement of judgment.

iv. End of Trial

a. In acquittal or

b. Conviction

v. Procedure for Trial under Cr.P.C

a. Trial by Magistrate

b. Summary Trial

c. Trial by High Court & Court of Session

Trial has three basic stages, which normally occur in the same order. Investigation (where evidences
are to be collected), Inquiry (A judicial proceeding where judge ensures for himself before going on
 General provision as to inquiry and trial

trial, that there are reasonable grounds to believe the person to be guilty) and trial. The term trial has
not been defined in the CrPC, however is commonly understood to mean – a judicial proceeding
where evidences are allowed to be proved or disproved, and guilt of a person is adjudged leading to a
acquittal or a conviction.
Trials are normally divided into Warrant Trials and Summons Trials. A criminal trial starts with framing
of charges, if a person is not discharged- trial begins, by framing of charge and reading and explaining
to him. After framing of charges the judge proceeds to take the “plea of guilt” which is an opportunity
to the accused to acknowledge that he pleads guilty and does not wish to content the case. Here the
judge’s responsibility is onerous, he has to, first ensure – plea of guilt is free and voluntary. Secondly –
he has also to ensure that if there had been no plea of guilt – was the prosecution version if
unrebutted- would have led to conviction. If both the requirements are met – then judge can record
and accept plea of guilt and convict the accused after listening to him on sentence
After plea of guilt is taken, if accused pleads “not guilty” or court does not accept his plea of guilt, trial
moves on- prosecutor then explains to the court the basic outline of the case and what evidences he
proposes to lead in order to prove the same. He ask the court to summon witnesses so that court can
record their evidence. As the prosecution has to start leading evidence to bring home the offence to
the accused – it is said “The Burden of Proof lies on the Prosecution”. The basic rule is whoever asserts
the affirmative of an issue has the burden to prove facts on which the accused’s liability depends, and
this burden of proof – is not a light burden – the prosecution has to prove that the accused is guilty
beyond reasonable doubts. This is primarily for two reasons:
1. A person’s (accused’s) life and liberty is involved.
2. And the state with the investigative machinery at its disposal is sufficiently armed to get good evidence
which an individual would not have.
So since now the burden of proof is on the prosecution it has to prove facts which incriminate the
accused. When witnesses for the prosecution are called they are first examined by the prosecutor –
then cross examination by the defence advocate, and with the leave of court prosecutor can again
examine to clarify the loopholes exposes during toss.
After the prosecutor has led its evidence – court asks the accused to himself enter the witness box but
in order to explain circumstances that appeared against him – he has given an opportunity to give
personal explanations. This is a remarkable manifestation of Audi Alteram Partem where the court
makes a direct dialogue with the accused to know what his take is. This is not a chance to the court to
bequile or cross examine the accused. Any answer given by accused is not to be used as evidence
against him but the court may take into consideration to adjudge overall trustworthiness of the case.
 General provision as to inquiry and trial

This is done u/s 311 CrPC, after the examination. If the court feels that prosecution has not successfully
brought home the guilt – it may acquit – else if it feels that they have sufficiently discharged their
burden – then it asks defence if it seeks to lead evidence, and the same cycle again. Now after
evidence from both sides is recorded. Parties then make arguments on the same, and in the end court
pronounces the judgement.
In case of Acquittal the accused is set at liberty. In case of conviction – the punitive dilemma begins.
The court has to fix another hearing to decide on the quantum of sentence. Here the prosecution as
well as the defence can lead evidences that would have been fatal earlier, in order to aggravate or
mitigate the punishment. Here the court gives equal leverage to the “Crime” as well as the “Criminal”.
Earlier the gravity of crime used to be the sole criteria – however in recent times, there has been a
definitive shifts of focus from crime to criminal which manifests growing importance of reformation at
the end of punishment. The court at this stage would also consider whether the accused is entitled to
the benefits of probation or admonition.
c. Trial by High Court & Court of Session

In a warrant case the trial begins with the framing of the charge when the accused is called upon to plead
thereto : but in a summons case, as if is not necessary to frame a formal charge, the ‘trial’ starts when the
accused is brought before the Magistrate and the particulars of the offence are stated to him. In a case
exclusively triable by a court of session the trial begins only after the committal proceedings by the Magistrate.
The term “trial” includes appeal and revision, which are a continuation of the first ‘trial’

The function of a court in a criminal trial is to find out whether the person arraigned before it as the
accused’ is guilty of the offence with which he is charged. For this purpose it scans the material on
record to find whether there is any reliable and trustworthy evidence on the basis of which it is
possible to found the conviction of the accused and to hold that he is guilty of the offence with which
he is charged.

[Harchand Singh v. State of Haryana, 1975 (1) S.C.J. 102],

DISTINGUISH BETWEEN INQUIRY AND TRAIL

Inquiry and Trial :

 General provision as to inquiry and trial

Both inquiry and trial are judicial proceedings, but they differ in the following respects:
(1) An enquiry does not necessarily mean an inquiry into an offence for, it may, as well relate to matters
which are not offences, e.g., inquiry made in disputes as to immovable property with regard to
possession, public nuisances, or for the maintenance of wives and children. A trial on the other hand, is
always of an offence.
(2) An inquiry in respect of an offence never ends in conviction or acquittal; at the most. It may result in
discharge or commitment of the case to sessions. A trial must invariably end in acquittal or conviction
of the accused.

i. Conducting Authority

a. Inquiry. Magistrate or the Court

c. Trial. Judge or a Magistrate

iii. Commencement

a. Inquiry. It starts when complaint is filed to the Magistrate

c. Trial. It starts either by framing of charge or arrangement of the accused.

iv. As to meaning

a. Inquiry. Any proceedings conducted by Magistrate or a Court

c. Trial. The Judicial Proceedings conducted by Court.

v. Result

a. Inquiry. It finishes only with the recommendations.

c. Trial. It finishes with the punishment or acquittal.

vi. Purpose

a. Inquiry. Determination of truth.

 General provision as to inquiry and trial

c. Trial. Finalization of truth and falsity.

vii. Proceedings

a. Inquiry. It is proceedings by Magistrate.

c. Trial. It is judicial proceedings.

viii. Framing of Charge

a. Inquiry. In a charge is framed during inquiry.

c. Trial. It starts after farming of charge.

ix. Remedy.

a. Inquiry. Appeal or revision against decision.

c. Trial. Transfer of investigation order

x. Process

a. Inquiry. It is the last process

c. Trial. 1st process

Brief the Jurisdiction of criminal Courts in inquiries &Trials

 General provision as to inquiry and trial

INTRODUCTION: - A Magistrate within whose local jurisdiction the offence is committed is competent
to take cognizance and to try the case. The jurisdiction of the Magistrate does not come to an end by
transfer of the locality, where the crime was committed to another district. The court having jurisdiction
to try the offences committed in pursuance of the conspiracy can try the offence of conspiracy even if
it was committed outside its jurisdiction under section 177.
It makes it clear that an offence shall be inquired and tried by a court within the local limits of
whose jurisdiction the offence was committed.B.Patnaik v/s Smt.Binand, 1970, it was held that court
decided that offences shall be tried by a court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the offence
was committed.
1. Place of inquiry or trial in certain matters:- Sec.178, when it is uncertain in which of several local areas
an offences was committed. The offence is committed partly in one local area and partly in another.
Where an offence is continuing one and continues to be committed in more local areas than one.
Then it may be inquired or tried by a court having jurisdiction over any of such local areas. State of
M.P. v/s K.P.Ghiyara-1957.

2. Offence triable where act is done:- An act is an offence by reason of anything which has been done
and of a consequence which has ensued the offence may be inquired into or tried by a court within
whose local jurisdiction such thing has been done or such consequence has ensued under sec. 179.
Case Lal chand v/s State -1961is suitable example a gang was created for dacoity in a district but was
committed in another district, it was decided that the case can be tried by the court of any of the two
districts.

3. Place of trial act is offence by reason of relation to other offence:-When an act is an offence by reason
of its to any other act which is also an offence or which would be an offence if the door were capable
of committing an offence the offence which is done first may be inquired into or tried by a court within
whose local jurisdiction either act was done, under sec.180. Munna Lal v/s State of Rajasthan-1964:
committing theft and receiving stolen property, such matter can be tried by a court of any of the two
places.
4. Place of trial in case of certain offences:-Any offence of being a thug or murder committed by a thug
of dacoity, of dacoity with murder of belonging to a gang of dacoits or of escaping from custody may
be inquired into or tried by a Court within whose local jurisdiction the offence was committed or the
accused person is found. Under sec.181.Jaswant Singh v/s Emperor, 1918, in a matter of abduction of
 General provision as to inquiry and trial

married woman for the purpose of unlawful intercourse, it can be tried that court within whose local
jurisdiction the woman was detained.

5. Offences committed by Letters etc:- Any offence which includes cheating may if the deception is
practiced by means of letters o telecommunication message be inquired into or tried by any court
within whose local jurisdiction such letters or messages were sent or were received and may offence of
cheating and dishonesty including delivery of property may be inquired into or tried by a court within
whose local jurisdiction the property was delivered by the person deceived or was received by the
accused person under sec.182. Tekumalla Muneiah v/s C.B.Ammanamma, 1991: it was a case of bigamy
the court held the complainant could be entertained by the court having territorial jurisdiction over
that place.

6. Offence committed on journey or voyage:- When an offence is committed while the person by or
against whom or the thing in respect of which the offence is committed is in the course of performing
a journey or voyage the offence may be inquired into or tried by a court through or into whose local
jurisdiction that person or thing passed in the course of that journey or voyage, u/sec.183.

7. Place of trial for offences triable together:- Sec.184 says, where the offence committed by any person
are such that he may be charged with and tried at one trial for each such offence by virtue of the
provisions of seec.219 or sec.220 or sec.221. The offence or offences committed by several persons are
such that they may be charged with and tried together by virtue of the provision of
sec.223.Case: Pursottam Dalmiya v/s State of W.B.-1961.

8. Offences Committed Outside India:- When offences is committed outside India by a citizen of India,
whether on the high seas or elsewhere or by a person not being such citizen on any ship or aircraft
registered in India, he may be dealt with in respect of such offence as if it had been committed at any
place in India at which he may be found.

CONCLUSION
 General provision as to inquiry and trial

Under the code investigation consists generally of the following steps;

1. Proceedings to the spot,

2. Ascertainment of the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. Discovery and arrest of the suspected offender

4. Collection of evidence relating to the commission of the offence which may consist of a. the
examination of various persons (including the accused) and the reduction of their statement into
writing, if the officer thinks fit, b the search of places or seizure of things considered necessary for the
investigation and to be produced at the trial.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
 General provision as to inquiry and trial

1. RattanlalDhirajlal, Criminal Procedure Code

2. R.V. Kelkar, Criminal Procedure Code

3. S.N. Mishra, he Code of Criminal Procedure Code

4. D.D. Basu, Criminal Procedure Code

5. ChandershekharPillai (ed)., Kelkar’s Outlines of Criminal Procedure Code.