Sie sind auf Seite 1von 7

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/280620497

Numerical modelling of large diameter piles under lateral loading for offshore
wind applications

Conference Paper · June 2015


DOI: 10.1201/b18442-105

CITATIONS READS

27 4,874

17 authors, including:

Lidija Zdravkovic David M. G. Taborda


Imperial College London Imperial College London
165 PUBLICATIONS   1,649 CITATIONS    85 PUBLICATIONS   384 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

David Potts Richard Jardine


Imperial College London Imperial College London
240 PUBLICATIONS   4,485 CITATIONS    148 PUBLICATIONS   4,136 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

PISA Project View project

Smart Rail View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Byron W. Byrne on 03 August 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Numerical modelling of large diameter piles under lateral loading for
offshore wind applications
L. Zdravković, D.M.G. Taborda, D.M. Potts & R.J. Jardine
Imperial College London, UK
M. Sideri & F.C. Schroeder
Geotechnical Consulting Group, UK
B.W. Byrne, R. McAdam, H.J. Burd, G.T. Houlsby & C.M. Martin
University of Oxford, UK
K. Gavin, P. Doherty & D. Igoe
University College Dublin, Ireland
A. Muir Wood, D. Kallehave & J. Skov Gretlund
DONG Energy Wind Power, Denmark
ABSTRACT: There is currently a significant focus on developing offshore wind power in the UK and Europe.
The most common foundation type for wind turbines is a single large diameter pile, termed a monopile, on
which the turbine is located. As the diameter of such piles is envisaged to increase in future installations, there
are concerns that current design methods are not applicable. To explore this problem, the joint industry project
PISA has been established, with the aim to develop a new design framework for laterally loaded piles utilised
in the offshore wind industry, based on new theoretical developments, numerical modelling and large scale
field pile testing. This paper presents an overview of numerical modelling undertaken as part of the project.

1 INTRODUCTION This paper provides an overview of numerical


modelling undertaken on the project, while the de-
Development of the offshore wind energy sector is a
velopment of the new design methodology is out-
current major focus of the UK’s and Europe’s re-
lined in a companion paper Byrne et al. (2015b).
newable energy policy. The most common offshore
wind farm installation involves sinking of large di-
ameter single piles (monopiles) as foundation sys- 2 GROUND CONDITIONS
tems on which turbines are located. Pile diameters,
D, of 5 m and 6 m are now routinely used, with D of The objective of the PISA project is to consider two
up to 10 m being considered for future designs. distinct ground conditions likely to be encountered
There are concerns within the industry that existing in some sectors of the North Sea, a stiff overconsoli-
design methods, in particular the widely used p-y dated clay and a dense sand. As the planned large
approach, which were developed for much smaller scale field pile testing will be done onshore, the cho-
and more flexible piles, may not be appropriate for sen test sites also had to be representative of the re-
the design of these large diameter stiff piles. To ex- quired ground conditions. In this respect the site at
plore this problem the joint industry project PISA Cowden, UK, was deemed representative of stiff
(Pile Soil Analysis), coordinated by DONG Energy, overconsolidated clay tills, whereas the site at Dun-
has been established with the aim of developing a kirk in northern France was chosen as a dense sand
new design framework for laterally loaded piles for site. Both sites have been characterised through pre-
the offshore wind industry. vious research and testing programmes (Powell &
The new development draws on the existing p-y Butcher 2003, Chow 1997), providing the prelimi-
approach, but extends it by including additional soil nary input for numerical analyses.
reaction components that are shown to be important
as D increases. For this purpose advanced 3D finite
element analyses have been performed, modelling 3 SCOPE OF THE NUMERICAL STUDY
the monopile behavior in realistic ground conditions To establish the backbone behavior of monopile/soil
encountered in the North Sea. The analyses results interaction in conditions of lateral loading, all initial
are interpreted in the form of extracted soil reaction finite element analyses simulate monotonic lateral
curves, which are then normalised and parametrised loading of piles, without considering pile installation
before being embedded in the new method. The effects. Two sets of analyses are performed for each
large scale field pile testing (Byrne et al. 2015a), as site.
part of the project, will serve as a benchmark for val- One set consists of analyses of selected test piles
idating both the finite element analyses and the new in ground conditions of the site, with the purpose of
design method. aiding the pile design and test loading stages. These
piles are of smaller diameters (i.e. D = 0.76 m and from triaxial tests on heavily over-consolidated sam-
2.1 m) compared to full scale piles, with length to ples showed their considerable distance from the
diameter ratios (L/D) of 3, 6 and 10 and a 10 m high original MCC ellipse, thus presenting the need for
stickup (h). the Hvorslev surface (Fig. 3).
The second set comprises parametric analyses of
full scale piles in idealised ground conditions which
are based on the test site, but are more representative
of North Sea settings. The dimensions of these piles
include D = 5, 7.5 and 10 m, L/D = 2 and 6, with
h/D = 5 and 15 to investigate the pile/soil interaction
due to both wave (low h/D) and wind (high h/D)
loading. The thickness of the pile walls, t, was also
varied. Additional finite element studies were con-
ducted with varying ground conditions.
All analyses are performed with the finite element
code ICFEP (Potts & Zdravković 1999), which em-
ploys a modified Newton-Raphson nonlinear solver,
with an error-controlled sub-stepping stress-point al-
gorithm.

4 CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING
4.1 Soil at Cowden
The stiff glacial clay till deposits at Cowden are
simulated using an expanded generalised version of Figure 1. Pore water pressure profile at Cowden.
the Modified Cam Clay (MCC) model (Potts &
Zdravković 1999). The model utilises a Hvorslev
surface on the dry side (Tsiampousi et al. 2013), the
general expression of Van Eekelen (1980) for the
soil strength variation in the deviatoric plane and it
simulates a nonlinear stiffness variation with strain,
with the model described in Taborda (2011).
Model calibration was iterative and based on the
available results from element tests (oedometer,
drained and undrained triaxial compression and ex-
tension) and from field measurements, all summa-
rised in Powell & Butcher (2003), with most data
pre-dating 2000s. Field measurements revealed an
under-drained pore water pressure (pwp) profile on
site and several layers of glacial till, underlain by
chalk at about 40 m depth (Fig. 1). The thick solid
line shows the pwp profile adopted for analyses of
test piles at Cowden, which is used for establishing
the initial effective stresses in the ground. The verti-
cal effective stress is calculated by prescribing the
bulk unit weight of the soil of 21.19 kN/m3. The hor-
izontal effective stress is then obtained by prescrib-
Figure 2. K0 profile at Cowden.
ing the K0 profile shown in Figure 2. The high meas-
ured superficial K0 values from oedometer swelling
tests were considered inconsistent with glaciation on The undrained strength profile, Su, in triaxial
the site and the K0 profile for analyses was therefore compression in Figure 4 shows significant scatter,
limited to 1.5 in the top 4 metres. which reflects the difficulty in obtaining good quali-
Different strengths measured at critical state in ty samples in clay tills. Model calibration was aimed
triaxial compression and extension (i.e. φ'TXC = 27o at matching the narrow band of strengths from
and φ'TXE = 32o) suggested strength dependency on pushed samples (black circles), which were identi-
Lode’s angle θ, and therefore the need for the Van fied by Powell & Butcher (2003) to be of a reasona-
Eekelen shape of deviatoric surface. Equally, plot- ble quality. The simulated profile is represented by a
ting the points of peak values of deviatoric stress black solid line in Figure 4.
tion process is lengthy as several parameters em-
ployed by the model lack clear physical meaning and
have to be estimated indirectly. As in the Cowden
case, the model was calibrated from the available
field (Chow 1997) and laboratory experiments (Sim
et al. 2013, Aghakouchak 2015).

Figure 3. Fitting of the Hvorslev surface to experimental data

In a similar manner, the maximum shear stiffness,


G0, obtained from laboratory shear wave measure-
ments using the bender element technique (Fig. 5),
shows large scatter in particular in the shallow de-
posits. The in-situ geophysics reveals stiffness ani-
sotropy typical of overconsolidated clays. The con-
stitutive model simulates only an isotropic soil
stiffness due to the lack of data on the anisotropic
stiffness degradation with strain. The model calibra-
tion was aimed at matching the resonant column and
in-situ GVH data, producing the G0 profile that corre-
sponds to 800p' (solid line). The simulated degrada-
tion of the normalised isotropic secant shear stiffness
(Gsec/p') with strain level is shown in Figure 6. There Figure 4. Profile of Su in triaxial compression at Cowden.
is again a large scatter in existing data of small strain
stiffness, with also a very poor resolution at very
small strains, reflecting the capabilities of instru-
mentation at that time. The calibration was aimed at
matching the stiffness degradation of anisotropically
consolidated Magnus till from the North Sea.
All model parameters are summarised in Table 1.

4.2 Soil at Dunkirk


The behaviour of Dunkirk sand is reproduced using
a bounding surface plasticity model based on the
version by Papadimitriou & Bouckovalas (2002) and
modified by Taborda et al. (2014). The model utilis-
es the state parameter of Been & Jefferis (1985).
In general, the mechanical response of sands is de-
fined using four distinct surfaces of an open wedge
shape in general stress space: the yield surface which
encloses the elastic region; the critical state surface
whose opening corresponds to the ultimate strength
of the material in triaxial compression and exten-
sion; the bounding surface which controls the peak
Figure 5. Profile of G0 at Cowden.
strength and the post-peak softening to critical state;
and the dilatancy surface which establishes the sign Field explorations showed the ground profile
of the plastic volumetric strains. comprising a top 3 m layer of very dense sand fill,
In terms of elastic behaviour the model adopts a placed hydraulically between 1972 and 1975 to raise
Ramberg-Osgood type variation of the tangent shear the local ground level. This sand was dredged locally
modulus. and is of the same geological origin as the natural
The calibration of the model was carried out fol- Flandrian sand deposit underneath. The latter is a
lowing the strategy outlined in Taborda (2011), normally consolidated marine sand to about 30 m
which adopts a hierarchical approach. The calibra- depth, underlain by a marine clay which extends be-
neath part of the southern North Sea and occurs in stiffness in the laboratory (Kuwano 1999) and from
South East England as London Clay. The ground very precise local strain instrumentation
water level (GWL) on site was found at 4 m depth, (Aghakouchak 2015). The so calibrated G0 profile
without showing tidal variation. The pwp profile is plots on the higher side of that interpreted from CPT
hydrostatic below GWL, with a linear variation and seismic cone data of Chow (1997) (Fig. 9).
above GWL to 10 kPa suction at the ground surface. However, comparison with the latest results from
seismic dilatometer tests (SCPT) by the IN SITU site
investigation company (June 2014), carried out in
preparation of the Dunkirk site for pile testing,
shows a much closer agreement.
All model parameters are summarised in Table 2.

Figure 6. Shear stiffness degradation for Cowden till.

Table 1. Summary of MCC parameters for Cowden Till


Component Parameters
Strength (Van Eekelen, 1980) X=0.548; Y=0.698; Z=0.1
Hvorslev surface – shape α = 0.25; n = 0.40 Figure 7. Determination of stress ratios at critical state.
Hvorslev surface –
plastic potential β = 0.25; m = 0.40
Virgin consolidation line v1 = 1.757; λ=0.062
Nonlinear elasticity –
bulk stiffness κ = 0.0124
Nonlinear elasticity –
shear stiffness G0 = 80 MPa; p'ref = 100 kPa
Nonlinear elasticity – a = 9.78E-5; b = 0.987;
shear stiffness degradation Rmin = 0.05

Based on the interpretation of CPT data the rela-


tive density of the fill layer was estimated at 100%
and in the remaining Flandrian sand at 75% (Chow
1997), corresponding to the initial void ratios of Figure 8. Determination of the CSL in p' – e space.
0.570 and 0.628 respectively. For the initialisation of
the vertical effective stress bulk unit weights or 17.1
kN/m3 above and 19.9 kN/m3 below GWT were pre-
scribed, while the K0 for the whole normally consol-
idated deposit was estimated as 0.4 (Chow 1997).
The strength, in terms of the stress ratio q/p', in
triaxial compression and extension at critical state
(Mcc and Mec), was estimated from drained tests per-
formed at three different stress levels (p' = 150, 300,
500 kPa) after an initial anisotropic consolidation.
Figure 7 shows the relevant stress ratio – strain
curves from which Mcc = 1.28 and Mec = 0.92 are es-
timated, the former corresponding to φ'TXC = 32o.
As these tests were performed up to large defor-
mation levels it was possible to approximately iden-
tify the critical state points. By utilising these points
and the assumption that the position of the Critical
State Line (CSL) at p' = 0 kPa corresponds to the
maximum void ratio for this sand (0.91, Sim et al.
2013), the estimated CSL is shown in Figure 8.
The maximum shear modulus, G0, was estimated
from bender element measurements of elastic shear Figure 9. Profile of G0 at Dunkirk.
Table 2. Summary of bounding surface model parameters for the pile is represented with 8-noded shell elements
Dunkirk sand (Schroeder et al. 2007) and the interface between the
Component Parameters pile and the soil with 16-noded zero-thickness inter-
Critical State Line p'ref = 101.3 kPa; ecs,ref = 0.91; face elements (Day & Potts 1994).
λ = 0.135; ξ = 0.179 The horizontal load at pile top (at z = h) is applied
Strength Mcc = 1.28; Mec = 0.92
Model surfaces kcb = 4.94; kcd = 0.50; m = 0.065 in a displacement controlled manner, with incre-
p'YS = 1.0 kPa; A0 = 1.20 ments of uniform displacement in the x-direction
Hardening modulus h0 = 0.01; α = 1.0; γ = 0.0; around the pile perimeter. The horizontal load, H, on
β = 0.0; µ = 1.0 the pile is then obtained as the reaction to the applied
Nonlinear elasticity – displacements. Loading is undrained in the clay and
small strain stiffness B = 916.0; ν = 0.17 drained in the sand.
Nonlinear elasticity –
stiffness degradation a1 = 0.35; γ1 = 2.0E-3; κ = 2.0
Fabric tensor H0 = 0.0; ζ = 0.0

4.3 Idealisation of ground conditions


The 3D finite element analyses of test piles are per-
formed in the Cowden and Dunkirk ground condi-
tions as described above, with constitutive models
and model parameters summarised in Tables 1 & 2,
respectively. For the analyses of full scale large di-
ameter monopiles the ground conditions were ideal-
ised for closer representation of the North Sea condi-
tions. This was achieved by adopting a single layer
of clay till and dense sand, respectively, with hydro- Figure 10. Typical FE mesh for monopile analyses.
static pwp profile from the ground surface, as shown
in the example of the idealised clay till in Figure 1.
This causes a reduction in the effective stresses, 6 RESULTS
which manifests itself in slight changes in various
profiles, as shown in Figures 2, 4, 5 and 9. The mod- Only brief FE results are presented here to show the
el parameters in both cases remain unchanged. global monopile/soil interaction under monotonic
lateral loading. The results from large scale mono-
pile analyses in a stiff glacial till are taken as an ex-
4.4 Other materials ample, although the trends are the same for test piles
The tubular steel piles are modeled as elastic, with and for dense sand ground conditions.
Young’s modulus of 200 GPa and a Poisson’s ratio Figure 11 shows the load (at application point)
of 0.3. versus the displacement (at mudline) curves for D =
An interface between the pile and the soil outside 10 m piles, in which L, h and t were varied. The dis-
the pile is modelled such that it can allow a gap to placements are significantly larger than would nor-
open around the pile during lateral loading. In the mally be required for design, where typically 10% of
stiff clay till conditions, this interface is simulated pile diameter is defined as ULS failure. This was
with a Tresca model, such that in compression it necessary so that the extracted soil reaction curves
adopts the undrained strength of the surrounding soil could be fully defined. In addition, Figure 12 shows
(Fig. 4), whereas the strength in tension is limited to the deflected shapes of the same piles for the case
zero. In the dense sand soil conditions, the interface when the horizontal displacement at mudline reaches
is represented with a Mohr-Coulomb model, pre- 0.1D (nominal failure).
scribing φ' = 32o and cohesion c' = 0 kPa. Conse- The main observations from these two figures in-
quently, if respectively the total or effective normal clude: increase in pile load capacity with increasing
stress at the interface becomes less than 0 kPa, a gap L and reduction in pile load capacity with increasing
will open. h, other geometric parameters remaining the same;
negligible effect of pile wall thickness on both the
load capacity and pile deflection; a rigid body de-
5 NUMERICAL MODEL formation of shorter piles, with longer piles behav-
ing in a more flexible manner. The latter observation
A typical 3D finite element mesh for all piles is is characteristic of all stages of loading, even at very
shown in Figure 10. Due to geometric and loading small displacements. The observed “kick-back” of
symmetry, it is sufficient to model only half of the shorter piles, with fairly large displacements mobi-
problem. The soil is discretised with 20-noded hexa- lised at the pile base, justifies the starting hypothesis
hedral displacement-based isoparametric elements, of the new design method in that additional soil re-
action components have to be considered compared Carbon Trust through the Offshore Wind Accelera-
to the conventional p-y approach. How this is done is tor, DONG Energy, Iberdrola, RWE, SSE, Statoil,
described in Byrne et al. (2015b). Results in Figures Statkraft, Vattenfall, Alstom and EDF.
11 & 12 are also typical of all other pile geometries
and ground conditions considered in this study.
8 REFERENCES
Aghakouchak, A. 2015. Laboratory characterisation of cyclic
behaviour of driven piles in sand, PhD thesis, Imperial Col-
lege London.
Been, K.. & Jefferies, M.G. 1985. The state parameter for sand.
Geotechnique 35 (2): 99-112
Byrne, B.W., McAdam, R., Burd, H.J., Houlsby, G.T., Martin,
C.M., Gavin, K., Doherty, P., Igoe, D., Zdravković, L.,
Taborda, D.M.G., Potts, D.M., Jardine, R.J., Sideri, M.,
Schroeder, F.C., Muir Wood, A., Kallehave, D. and Skov
Gretlund, J. 2015a. Field testing of large diameter piles un-
der lateral loading for offshore wind applications. Proc 16th
European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical
Engineering (ECSMGE). Edinburgh, UK.
Byrne, B.W., McAdam, R., Burd, H.J., Houlsby, G.T., Martin,
C.M., Zdravković, L., Taborda, D.M.G., Potts, D.M.,
Jardine, R.J., Sideri, M., Schroeder, F.C., Gavin, K.,
Figure 11. Load-displacement curves for D = 10 m piles in stiff Doherty, P., Igoe, D., Muir Wood, A., Kallehave, D. and
clay till. Skov Gretlund, J. 2015b. New design methods for large di-
ameter piles under lateral loading for offshore wind applica-
tions. Proc 3rd International Symposium on Frontiers in
Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG 2015). Oslo, Norway.
Chow, F.C. 1997. Investigations into the behaviour of dis-
placement piles for offshore foundations. PhD thesis, Impe-
rial College, University of London.
Day, R.A. and Potts, D.M. 1994. Zero thickness interface ele-
ments - numerical stability and application. Int. Jnl. Num.
Analy. Meth. Geomech. 18: 689-708.
Kuwano, R. 1999. The stiffness and yielding anisotropy of
sand. PhD thesis, Imperial College, University of London.
Papadimitriou, A.G. & Bouckovalas, G.D. 2002. Plasticity
model for sand under small and large cyclic strains: a multi-
axial formulation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engi-
neering 22 (3): 191-204.
Potts, D.M. & Zdravković, L. 1999. Finite element analysis in
geotechnical engineering: theory. London: Thomas Tel-
ford.
Powell, J.J.M. & Butcher, A.P. 2003. Characterisation of a
glacial clay till at Cowden, Humberside. In: Tan et. al., ed.
Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural
Soils. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, pp. 983-1020.
Figure 12. Deflections of D = 10 m piles in stiff clay till. Schroeder, F.C., Day, R.A., Potts, D.M. & Addenbrooke, T.I.
2007. An 8-node isoparametric shear deformable shell ele-
ment. Int. Jnl of Geomechanics, 7 (1): 44-52.
7 CONCLUSIONS Sim, W.W., Aghakouchak, A. & Jardine, R.J. 2013. Cyclic tri-
axial tests to aid offshore pile analysis and design. ICE
The paper presents development of a numerical Proc. - Geotechnical Engineering, 166: 111-121.
model for finite element analyses of laterally loaded Taborda, D.M.G. 2011. Development of constitutive models for
monopiles for wind turbines, as the basis of the new application in soil dynamics. PhD Thesis, Imperial College,
design methodology for such piles. The analyses re- University of London.
Taborda, D.M.G., Zdravkovic, L., Kontoe, S. & Potts, D.M.
sults have revealed the likely mechanisms of mono- 2014. Computational study on the modification of a bound-
pile/soil interaction, in particular in the cases of ing surface plasticity model for sands; Computers & Ge-
shorter and stubbier piles, confirming that the con- otechnics 59, 145-160
ventional p-y methodology is unlikely to be suitable Tsiampousi, A., Zdravkovic, L. & Potts, D.M. 2013. A new
for the design of such piles. Hvorslev surface for critical state type unsaturated and satu-
rated constitutive models; Computers & Geotechnics 48:
156-166.
8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Van Eekelen, H.A.M. 1980. Isotropic yield surfaces in three
dimensions for use in soil mechanics. Int. Jnl. Num. Anal.
The Authors acknowledge the generous funding Meth. Geomech., 4: 89-101.
support of the partners of this project, including the

View publication stats

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen