0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
65 Ansichten2 Seiten
The document discusses a Supreme Court case that ruled a manning agency liable for breaching its contract with a seafarer by preventing his deployment without valid reason. Specifically:
- A contract was signed between the seafarer and manning agency for a one-year position, but on the departure date the agency cited defects in his medical certificate to prevent leaving.
- However, the certificate showed he was fit for work, and the agency provided no evidence for non-deployment.
- While contracts commence on actual departure, the court found the agency breached obligations from the perfected contract by unjustifiably preventing deployment.
- Therefore, the agency was liable for the seafarer
The document discusses a Supreme Court case that ruled a manning agency liable for breaching its contract with a seafarer by preventing his deployment without valid reason. Specifically:
- …