Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
situations independently of natural, social, or divine restraints. Free will is denied by some
proponents of determinism. Arguments for free will are based on the subjective experience of
freedom, on sentiments of guilt, on revealed religion, and on the universal supposition of
responsibility for personal actions that underlies the concepts of law, reward, punishment, and
incentive (for additional discussion of free will and determinism, see moral responsibility, problem
of). In theology the existence of free will must be reconciled with God’s omniscience and goodness
(in allowing people to choose badly) and with divine grace, which allegedly is necessary for any
meritorious act. A prominent feature of existentialism is the concept of a radical, perpetual, and
frequently agonizing freedom of choice. Jean-Paul Sartre (1905–80), for example, spoke of the
individual “condemned to be free.”
Will - is a legal document that indicates how a person wants his or her estate (money and property)
to be distributed after death. Wills must expressly state to whom the will belongs and be signed,
dated and include the signatures of at least two witnesses. A will also may describe any wishes for
funeral and burial arrangements and may designate guardians for minor children.
How it works/Example:
A man who has created a will is called the testator; a woman is called a testarix. However, testator
is often used in reference to both genders.
When the testator dies, the executor, who is named in the will, administers the distribution of the
estate to the beneficiaries (a beneficiary is any person or organization that receives the assets after
the testator's death). The executor's job also includes paying any bills and taxes owed by the
estate as well as locating and protecting the assets until they are distributed. An executor often
receives payment for his or her services, and the payment varies from state to state.
Many people hire an attorney to draw up a will, but many states (though not all states) also
recognize holographic wills, which are simply created in the testator's own handwriting on a
regular piece of paper (holographic wills are more frequently contested, however).
A testator can change a will at any time, for any reason, and should keep the original copy of the
will in a safe place. A copy also should be given to the executor. There is some controversy over
whether banks may seal a safe-deposit box after a renter's death, so consult a professional regarding
storage of this important document.
If one does not have a will before death, the state's intestate succession rules determine how a
person's assets are distributed. These rules vary by state. Normally, a person's spouse and children
receive the estate first, then members of extended family. If there are no surviving family members,
the estate may pass to the state.
THE MORAL DIMENSION OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
Bob Corbett
Spring 2000
In many areas of human existence people generally do not hold that they may behave in just any
way they want toward other people. (This same limit may well be argued for other groups than
people as well. It may be held about our relationships to animals, to nature in general, even to gods
or other transcendental beings. But here I limit my remarks to our relationships with other people.)
At the political level every government makes certain acts illegal and punishes those who
transgress. At the social level we often show disapproval of people when they act in certain ways
and by that disapproval, we try to shape behavior away from the offending behaviors. At the
religious level certain acts are often held by the religion to be unacceptable, or sinful or some sort
of disapproval. Even at the personal level (perhaps influenced by religion, society and government)
we often will feel that certain acts toward other people are just not something we should do. This
entire realm is the area of moral concern.
Moral philosophy is a discipline of philosophy which uses the tools of human reason to inquire
into these questions of what should and shouldn't be done with and to other persons. (Government
uses reason as a tool, but also uses the machinations of politics and interests as tools. Society uses
reason as a tool, but also the power and value of tradition and social values as tools. Religion uses
reason as a tool, but also uses divine revelation, and faith as tools.)
When I talk of moral dimensions of education I am thinking of moral obligations in a philosophical
perspective, where reason is the dominant tool.
Within the formal educational establishment at the elementary and secondary level one category
of relationships are those of adults to those we call "children." Mainly these are humans who are
under the age of 19, and who, in most cultures, are legally regarded as minors.
Within these relationships when we as adults are in relation with children as students, we are in
relation with them in various roles. The key roles (but not the only ones) that interest me are:
as teachers
as administrators
as parents
as citizens
Given that in almost every nation on earth school attendance is mandatory by law and required to
at least the age of 16, we as citizens participate in this force applied to the young. As parents we
often use the power and force of our roles to be sure children are in school and more or less fulfill
the wishes of the school. And so on with the more stringent powers of teachers and administrators.
Within recent decades there has been some minor attention paid to the "rights" of students in the
face of all this power. It has been held (and behavior enforced) in at least some nations such as the
United States, that there are limits on how adults may relate with minor students in school. Some
limits are:
students may not be beaten at will and in all manners.
students may often have certain freedoms of dress and personal grooming previously unknown in
the schools
students may have certain rights to privacy of their lockers and personal belongings in the school.
and so on.
I maintain that there is a significant moral dimension to philosophy of education. As adults,
whether in the roles of teachers, administrators, parents or citizens, have power and authority over
students. As in other moral situations we need good reasons to interfere in the personal behavior
of children (even MAKING them students is a moral choice) and we should have good and
adequate reasons for our relationships with them.
To explore those reasons and those areas of interchange is the moral dimension of philosophy of
education.
There will not be a specific place or time where we will carry on this investigation in this course.
Rather, it will pervade the entirety of the course. I will try to make us face these issues at every
turn.
There is a tendency toward what I will call traditional behavior. That is, if a certain behavior pattern
is widespread and common in a culture it tends to become regarded as "RIGHT," even
"NATURAL." Often when this is the case it is very difficult to get the questions on to the floor of
serious moral inquiry. We have seen this within the past 1/2 century with the questions of the
relationships between blacks and whites and between men and women. There were traditional
behavioral patterns in place and attitudes toward blacks, whites, men and woman which told us the
place of each in society, even the "nature" of each. In the past 1/2 century the traditional views of
these relationships have been severely challenged and in some significant and historical degree
dramatically overturned.
Thus, as we move into the 21st century we see very different views of the nature of race and gender
relations and little by little behaviors toward those moral dimensions of human behavior are
changing. It is often the case that intellectual attitudes change much earlier than the dominant
behavior patterns of a culture.
It is a central thrust of this course that our attitudes toward adults and minor students need to be
dramatically (radically) reassessed and that some of our previous attitudes will be seen to not
measure up to reasoned inquiry. If this is so, then it would follow that there would need to be
behavioral changes which would likely follow upon these changes in attitudes. These behavior
changes, if needed, would likely impact our view of what education is all about.
I will take the responsibility of raising these moral issues as often as time permits, and I urge and
encourage you to do the same.
Famous Philosophers
Philosophy, which literally means “the love of wisdom,” is one of the oldest disciplines in
history. There are many ideas about philosophers and what they do. Some have even considered
the field to be a science that deals with logic and reason. Either way, many famous philosophers
have made their contributions known to the world through their writings and their students.
Below is a list of the greatest thinkers of all time along with their most important theories about
human nature and other ponderings of the world.