Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Flow Measurements
1
ABSTRACT
The objective of this experiment is to study the fluid flow through Ventury meter
and Orifice plate. From the experimental results we can find out the head losses through
each of that. With the use of that value we can determine Coefficients of discharge for
each Ventury meter and Orifice plate.
Since these two components are widely used in fluid flow systems to measure the
flow rate we can use those values to calculate the actual flow rates because by measuring
the pressure differences at two points with different cross sectional areas we can calculate
only the theoretical value of discharge.
The major results of the experiment are the coefficients of discharge and the
amount of head losses in each component. With the use of the values we can determine
how the applications of each of these on the system.From the results we obtained we can
calibrate Ventury meter and Orifice plate and use them in the practical applications to
measure the Finally we can conclude that orifice plate has a lower coefficient of
discharge and higher head loss.Ventury meter has higher coefficient of discharge and
lower head loss. But the Orifice plate is easy to apply to a given system. Selection
between these two depends on the application considering the head loss and the rate of
the flow.
2
OBJECTIVE AND INTRODUCTION
Place your objective and introduction here. State the objective clearly in a complete
sentence. A few explanatory sentences may be included, if needed.
The objectives
• Determination of CD value of the orifice plate.
The introduction
3
THEORY AND EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
THEORY
1. Orifice plate
(01)
(02) (03)
Pressure head p
Velocity head v
PesometricHead Z
“
Bernoulli’s equation is applied from (1) to (2)
2 2
P1 V1 P V
+ + Z1 = 2 + 2 + Z 2
ρg 2 g ρg 2 g
Since the potential energy remains unchanged,
2 2
P1 − P2 V2 − V1
=
ρg 2g
According to the continuity of the flow
A1V1=A2V2
A1
V2 = V1
A2 ”
4
2( ( P1 − P2 ) )
Qtheoretica l = A1 .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... ..Eq n (1)
2
ρ A1 A − 1
2
Lab manual
Lab manual
1/2
∆P67
Pa
gradient
Q real m3/s
5
2. Ventury Meter
Assumptions
• Stream lines are parallel to the from (1) to (3) cross sections.
• The fluid is incompressible and inviscied
• Gravity effects are neglected
• There are no shear or viscose forces acting
Pressure head p
Velocity head v
PesometricHead Z
6
Since the potential energy remains unchanged,
2 2
P1 − P2 V2 − V1
=
ρg 2g
According to the continuity of the flow
A1V1=A2V2
A
V2 = 1 V1
A2
2( ( P1 − P2 ) )
Qtheoretica l = A1 .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... ..Eq n (1)
2
ρ A1 A − 1
2
Lab manual
Lab manual
2 2
P1 V1 P V
+ + Z 1 = 2 + 2 + Z 2 + HL
ρg 2 g ρg 2 g
Since
Z1 = Z 2
……..………………..Eqn(3)
7
Experimental Method
Experimental Setup
1. Outlet pipe
2. Flow control valve (VCC)
3. Orifice plate
4. Air inlet valve ( to be
connected to the hand
pump)
5. Variable area flow meter
6. Eight bank manometer
7. Venturi meter
8. Pressure trapping
8
“ Procedure
9
8. manometer values (P6 and P7) ”
Lab manual
Precautions
If there are air bubbles in the flow we have to wait until all the air bubbles
are gone with the water before get the manometer reading.
Qactual
0.00050 18.1384
0.00042 14.5602
0.00033 11.3578
0.00025 9.3274
0.00017 5.6569
0.00008 0.0000
10
Slope = 0.00003
= 0.29
Since the slope of the curve is proportional to the it can be seene that at the
lower flow rates decrease for a little range and increase. But after the flow rates exceed
about 10 m3/s it shows a linear behavior.
The slope was calculated by using the “Slope” function in the Ms
Excel.Calculated value for the is .29 but according to the literature values it must be
about .65.This experimental errors may have caused this variation. Though the water
flow was assumed to be steady some leakages were observed practically. This has caused
a considerable loss in the fluid flow at the orifice plate.
11
Qactual Head Losstheoratical m
0.00050 0.1864
0.00042 0.1664
0.00033 0.1162
0.00025 0.0716
0.00017 0.0416
0.00008 0.0182
0.00000 0.0043
0.00050 86.00
0.00042 66.00
0.00033 48.00
0.00025 18.00
0.00017 9.00
0.00008 2.00
12
From both graphs 02 & 03 we can determine that both factors pressure drop and head loss
will increase with the flow rate.
Head loss is basically the energy loss occurs in the fluid flow. There are three
elementary factors of head loss
I. Body forcers
II. Shear effects
III. Boundary fluid forcers
When the flow rate of the fluid is increased the velocity of the fluid is increased and the
kinetic energy of the fluid particles is raised apparently. Then there will be a work done
by the forcers mentioned above.
13
Table 05
Qactual P6 P7 HL(THE) m
Graph 05
14
Table 06
Qactual P1 P2 HL(THE) m
Graph 06
Differences between head losses between Orifice plate and Ventury meter
Table 07
Qactual HL op -HL vt
0.00050 0.47
0.00042 0.31
0.00033 0.19
0.00025 0.12
0.00017 0.05
Graph 07
15
From the tabel 7 it can be seen HL op -HL vt is always a possitive which
proves the head loss of the orifice plate is always higher than tha ventury
tube.The behavioure of the differences between these two can be observed
from the graph 07.This behaviour can be defined by the non lamina flow at
the orifice plate with respect to the venturymeter.
We can see from this graph that the differences of the head losses of the
venturymeter and the orifice plate increases with the flow rate.So if we have to select ot
of these two in higher flow rates its preffer to select ventury meter than orifice plate.
0.00051 46 74 156.96
0.00043 130 146 78.48
0.00034 179 187 49.05
0.00026 230 235 9.81
0.00017 293 294 0.00
0.00009 336 336 0.00
16
With the increase of the flow rate the pressure differenses of the points 4 and 5 is
increased.This is due to the impact of the velocity head and the turbulant behavioure of
the fluid.This implyes that the readngs we are taken from this set up are not correct in the
higher flow rates.In other words the reliability of the system is decreased.A correction
must be made in the readings to arrive at the correct value while its operated in higher
flow rate values.
CONCLUSIONS
• The Coefficient of discharge for the venturimeter is greater than that for the
Orifice plate, which indicates that the head losses occurred in the Orifice plate
larger than that in the venturimeter.
• Both Orifice plate and the Venturi meter has there own head losses and the
pressure drops. These values must be taken in to account before they were
selected for a particular application.
• Orifice plate has a large head loss with respect to the ventury meter.But its
economical and can be installed easily.
• Ventury meter can be used in the applications where there should be a less
pressure drop and a lower head loss.
• Ventury meters are used to measure the flow rates of fluids consisted with solid
particles.
REFERENCES
17
[1] http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/orifice-nozzle-venturi-d_590.html
[2] Fluid Mechanics and Statics - Dougles.
APPENDICES
A. Sample Calculations
Flow rate
Example 1.
Pressure Drop
Example 2
Orifice plate
2( ( P1 − P2 ) )
Qtheoretical = A1
A1 2
ρ − 1
A2
18
2
Qtheoretical = A1 * ( ( P1 − P2 ))
A1 2
ρ − 1
A2
Ventury Meter
Q theoretical = Q actual / C d
= 0.0593 * Q the
P1 − P2
∴HL =
ρ
P1 − P2
HL= + 0.0593 * Q the
ρ
19
B. Raw Data Tables
Transport Lab
Index No : 090535B
Date : 20/10/2010
Observations
P1 P2 P3 P6 P7 P8 P4 P5
Q
mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm
l/min
H2O H2O H2O H2O H2O H2O H2O H2O
30 163 77 143 381 52 168 46 74
25 177 111 165 430 218 291 130 146
20 201 153 192 418 289 336 179 187
15 254 236 251 366 279 311 230 235
10 276 267 273 434 402 413 293 294
5 229 227 228 282 282 286 336 336
Date: 20/10/2010
Instructor’s signature :
20