Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1989
Recommended Citation
Tao, Jiaxun, "Rice Bran Stabilization by Improved Internal and External Heating Methods." (1989). LSU Historical Dissertations and
Theses. 4812.
https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4812
This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in
LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact
gradetd@lsu.edu.
INFORM ATION TO USERS
R ic e b r a n s ta b iliz a tio n b y im p r o v e d in te r n a l a n d e x te r n a l
h e a tin g m e th o d s
UMI
300 N. Zeeb Rd.
Ann Arbor, MI 48106
RICE BRAN STABILIZATION BY IMPROVED
INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL HEATING METHODS
A Dissertation
S u b m i t t e d t o t h e G r a d u a t e F a c u l t y of t h e
Louisiana State University and
Agricultural and Mechanical College
in p a r t i a l f u l f i l l m e n t of the
r e q u i r e m e n t s for t h e d e g r e e of
Doctor of Philosophy
in
T h e D e p a r t m e n t of F o o d S c i e n c e
by
Jiaxun Tao
B.S., N o r t h e a s t A g r i c u l t u r a l College, 1977
M.S., C h i n e s e A c a d e m y of A g r i c u l t u r a l Science, 1983
Aug us t, 1989
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
p r e p a r a t i o n of t h i s d i s s e r t a t i o n .
m i n o r p r o f e s s o r on th e a d v i s o r y c o m m i t t e e and Dr. R o b e r t M.
h i s s e r v i c e on t h e e x a m i n a t i o n c o mm it te e.
committee.
fe llowship.
ii
Escobar and Dr. Patricia Wozniak a re thanked for their
A t last, t h e a u t h o r w i s h e s t o e x p r e s s his g r a t e f u l n e s s
t h e a u t h o r ’s d a u g h t e r d u r i n g t h e f o u r - y e a r - l o n g p e r i o d w h e n
T h i s m a n u s c r i p t is d e d i c a t e d to t h e a u t h o r 's daughter,
Lynn.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S ...................................... iv
L I S T OF T A B L E S .......................................... vi
L I S T OF F I G U R E S ......................................... ix
A B S T R A C T ................................................ xii
I. I N T R O D U C T I O N ............................................... 1
R i c e and Ri ce B r a n .................................... 4
S i g n i f i c a n c e of the C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s
of R i c e Bra n on its S t a b i l i t y ..................15
R i c e B r a n S t a b i l i z a t i o n by
External Heating 25
I r r a d i a t i o n an d its A p p l i c a t i o n
for R i c e Br a n S t a b i l i z a t i o n .................... 35
III. M A T E R I A L S A N D M E T H O D S .................................4 2
P r o c u m e n t and M i l l i n g of R o u g h R i c e ............... 4 5
P r o x i m a t e A n a l y s i s ...................................48
P hy s i c a l a n d T h e r m a l Properties ................. 50
S t a b i l i z a t i o n T r e a t m e n t s ........................... 55
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
Chapter Page
III. S a m p l e A n a l y s e s ...................................... 61
S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s ................................ 63
H e a t T r a n s f e r A n a l y s e s ..............................63
IV. R E S U L T S A N D D I S C U S S I O N ................................. 69
M i l l i n g of R o u g h R i c e ............................... 69
P r o x i m a t e A n a l y s i s .................................. 71
Ph y s i c a l and T h e r m a l P r o p e r t i e s .................... 7 6
E f f e c t of S t a b i l i z a t i o n
T r e a t m e n t s on Bran S t a b i l i t y ................... 114
E f f i c i e n c y of He a t T r a n s f e r ........................138
T r e a t m e n t S e l e c t i o n ................................ 148
V. S U M M A R Y A N D C O N C L U S I O N S ............................... 157
L I T E R A T U R E C I T E D ....................................... 161
V I T A ..................................................... 17 3
v
LIST OF TABLES
Table page
Chapter I I I .
1. E x p e r i m e n t a l D e s i g n of M i c r o w a v e
H e a t i n g for Ric e B r a n S t a b i l i z a t i o n ...............57
C h a p t e r IV.
2. C o m p o s i t i o n of Ric e Br an F r a c t i o n s .................. 72
3. P r o x i m a t e A n a l y s i s of Long a n d M e d i u m
G r a i n Tr ue B r a n ....................................... 73
4. P a r t i c l e Si z e D i s t r i b u t i o n of W h o l e B r a n ............ 77
5. P a r t i c l e Si z e D i s t r i b u t i o n of Tr u e B r a n ............. 80
6. E f f e c t of G r a i n Ty p e on P h ys ic a l
P r o p e r t i e s of T r u e B r a n ..............................82
7. R e l a t i o n s h i p of P a r t i c l e S i z e to B u l k
D e n s i t y of True B r a n ................................. 84
8. R e l a t i o n s h i p of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t to Bulk
D e n s i t y of True B r a n ............................... 8 6
9. E f f e c t of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t on Bulk D e n s i t y
at I n d i c a t e d P a r t i c l e S i z e s of T r u e Bran . . . . 88
10. R e l a t i o n s h i p of P a r t i c l e Si z e to P o r o s i t y
of T r u e B r a n ........................................... 92
11. R e l a t i o n s h i p of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t to
P o r o s i t y of T r u e B r a n ................................ 9 3
12. E f f e c t of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t on
P o r o s i t y at I n d i c a t e d P a r t i c l e
S i z e s of Tr u e B r a n ....................................94
13. E f f e c t of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t on Bulk
and P ar t i c l e D e n s i t i e s of T r u e B r a n .............. 100
vi
LIST OF TABLES
(Continued)
Table page
15. R e l a t i o n s h i p of T r u e Bran M o i s t u r e
C o n t e n t t o T h e r m a l D i f f u s i v i t y ................. 110
16. R e l a t i o n s h i p of T r u e Bran P a r t i c l e S i z e
t o T h e r m a l D i f f u s i v i t y .............................ill
20. Free F a t t y A c i d C o n t e n t of S t a b i l i z e d
T r u e Bran D u r i n g S t o r a g e ( N a t o ) .................. 1 2 2
21. R e g r e s s i o n A n a l y s i s for F F A C h a n g e s
R e s u l t i n g fro m D i f f e r e n t S t a b i l i z a t i o n
T r e a t m e n t s ( N a t o ) ...................................124
22. E f f e c t of S t a b i l i z a t i o n T r e a t m e n t s on
E q u i l i b r i u m M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t of T r u e
B r a n D u r i n g S t o r a g e (Lemont) ................... 125
23. E f f e c t of S t a b i l i z a t i o n T r e a t m e n t s on
E q u i l i b r i u m M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t of T r u e
B r a n D u r i n g S t o r a g e (Nato) ...................... 126
24. M e a n s of H u n t e r C o l o r V a l u e s of H e a t
S t a b i l i z e d Bra n ( L e m o n t ) .......................... 132
25. M e a n s of H u n t e r C o l o r V a l u e s of Hea t
S t a b i l i z e d Bran (Nato) ........................... 133
26. E f f e c t of S t a b i l i z a t i o n T r e a t m e n t s on
Br a n P r o x i m a t e C o m p o s i t i o n ( L e m o n t ) ............. 135
vii
LIST OF TABLES
(Continued)
Table page
27. E f f e c t of S t a b i l i z a t i o n T r e a t m e n t s o n
B r a n P r o x i m a t e C o m p o s i t i o n ( N a t o ) ............... 136
28. P a r t i c l e S i z e D i s t r i b u t i o n in
M i c r o w a v e H e a t e d R i c e B r a n ...................... 139
30. H e a t P e n e t r a t i o n Data of S t e a m
R e t o r t e d R i c e B r a n ................................. 141
31. H e a t P e n e t r a t i o n Data of M i c r o w a v e
H e a t e d R i c e B r a n .................................. 14 5
32. C o m p a r i s o n of T h e r m a l E f f i c i e n c y of
T r e a t m e n t M e t h o d s .................................. 147
3 3. E f f e c t of M i c r o w a v e H e a t i n g T r e a t m e n t s
on R e s i d u a l P e r o x i d a s e A c t i v i t y
in Ric e B r a n ....................................... 150
34. R e g r e s s i o n A n a l y s i s of R e si du a l
P e r o x i d a s e A c t i v i t y of
M i c r o w a v e H e a t e d B r a n ............................. 151
viii
LI S T O F F I GU RE S
Figure page
C h a p t e r II.
1. S t r u c t u r e of th e R i c e G r a i n ........................... 7
2. P r i n c i p l e s of Ri ce M i l l i n g ........................... 11
C h a p t e r III.
3. Apparatus to M e a s u r e S p e c i f i c H e a t ............... 52
5. A p p a r a t u s for the D e t e r m i n a t i o n of He a t
T r a n s f e r E f f i c i e n c y in E x t e r n a l H e a t i n g .......... 65
6. A p p a r a t u s for the D e t e r m i n a t i o n of H e a t
T r a n s f e r E f f i c i e n c y in I n t e r n a l H e a t i n g . . . . 66
7. D e t e r m i n a t i o n of M i c r o w a v e H e a t e d
B r a n T e m p e r a t u r e by E x t r a p o l a t i o n ............... 68
Chapter IV.
1. P a r t i c l e S i z e D i s t r i b u t i o n of
W h o l e B r a n ............................................ 78
2. P a r t i c l e S i z e D i s t r i b u t i o n of
T r u e B r a n ............................................. 81
3. R e l a t i o n s h i p of B u l k D e n s i t y to
P a r t i c l e Si z e in T r u e B r a n ......................... 85
4. R e l a t i o n s h i p of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t
to Bu lk D e n s i t y in T r u e B r a n ...................... 87
5. E f f e c t of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t on B u l k
D e n s i t y of T r u e Bran at I n d i c a t e d
P a r t i c l e S i z e s ....................................... 89
ix
LIST OF FIGURES
(Continued)
Figure page
6. R e l a t i o n s h i p of P a r t i c l e Si z e t o P o r o s i t y
in T r u e B r a n ........................................ 9 5
7. R e l a t i o n s h i p of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t to
P o r o s i t y in Tr ue B r a n ..............................96
B . E f f e c t of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t on
P o r o s i t y of Tr ue Bran at
I n d i c a t e d P a r t i c l e S i z e s ........................ 97
9. E f f e c t of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t on B u l k and
P a r t i c l e D e n s i t i e s of T r u e B r a n .................. 101
10. C o m p a r i s o n of C a l c u l a t e d V s E x p e r i m e n t a l
V a l u e s of S p e c i f i c H e a t of T r u e B r a n ........... 104
11. T i m e - T e m p e r a t u r e D a t a for T h e r m a l
D i f f u s i v i t y D e t e r m i n a t i o n ......................... 108
12. F r e e Fatt y A c i d C o n t e n t of S t a b i l i z e d
T r u e Bran D u r i n g S t o r a g e ( L e m o n t ) ............... 116
13. F r e e F a t t y A c i d C o n t e n t of S t a b i l i z e d
T r u e B r a n D u r i n g S t o r a g e ( N a t o ) ..................123
14. E f f e c t of S t a b i l i z a t i o n T r e a t m e n t s on
E q u i l i b r i u m M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t of T r u e
Br a n D u r i n g S t o r a g e (Lemont) ................... 127
15. E f f e c t of S t a b i l i z a t i o n T r e a t m e n t s on
E q u i l i b r i u m M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t of T r u e
B r a n D u r i n g S t o r a g e (Nato) ...................... 128
16. H e a t i n g C u r v e s of O v e n Drie d
T r u e B r a n ............................................ 142
17. H e a t i n g C u r v e s of S t e a m R e t o r t e d
T r u e B r a n ............................................ 143
18. H e a t i n g C u r v e s of M i c r o w a v e
H e a t e d T r u e B r a n .................................... 146
x
LIST OF FIGURES
(Continued)
Figure page
19. E f f e c t of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t on
P e r o x i d a s e A c t i v i t y of Br a n
S t a b i l i z e d by M i c r o w a v e H e a t i n g ............... 154
20. E f f e c t of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t on Free
F a t t y A c i d s of B r a n S t a b i l i z e d by
M i c r o w a v e H e a t i n g ..................................155
xi
ABSTRACT
is a n e f f e c t i v e m e t h o d for t he i n a c t i v a t i o n of l i p a s e w h i c h
56.8%, respectively.
7.22% and 7.09% bran for long grain and medium grain,
xii
fiber, 8.49% and 8.41%; ash, 9.23% an d 9.46%; and nitrogen-
megarad.
xiii
The bran sa m p l e s w e r e a n a l y z e d for free fatt y a c i d s at the
u n s t a b l e u n d e r r o o m tempera tu re .
r e t o r t i n g d i d n o t p e r f o r m as e f f e c t i v e as m i c r o w a v e in heat
the b r a n u n i f o r m l y through ou t.
xiv
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
R i c e b r a n is a b y - p r o d u c t o b t a i n e d from m i l l i n g b r o w n
1
FFA formation could be very high (about 5-7% per day and
production.
b r a n by v a r i o u s t h e r m a l m e t h o d s . Oven d r i e d b r a n nee ds to
rice bra n is i m p o r t a n t in i m p r o v i n g c u r r e n t l y u s e d t h e r ma l
is not r e a d i l y available.
Previous explorations of advantages of microwave
t h i s area.
In o r d e r to impro ve c u r r e n t l y u s e d p r o c e s s i n g m e t h o d s
meet f o l l o w i n g s p e c i f i c object iv es :
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of rice bran;
q u a 1 ity and n u t r i e n t c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ;
s t a b i l i z a t i o n p r o c e d u r e s and m a k e suggestions.
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
regimes, from t ro p i c a l to t e m p e r a t e r e g i o n s d i s t r i b u t e d in
4
all (95%) of t h e c u l t i v a t e d v a r i e t i e s fall in t h e species
g r a i n t y p e s an d the g e n e t i c studies. T h i s s y s t e m ha s b e e n
procedures for d e t e r m i n i n g e a c h d i m e n s i o n ar e d e s c r i b e d by
A d a i r et a l . (1966). T h e si z e and s h a p e c l a s s e s u s e d as a
a l . 1966) .
c o m p o n e n t s as s h o w n in F i g u r e II-l.
Polio
PfnCO't
Scedcoo*
NuCtKuS
AI«uror.« Oye»
H u l l -<
Subol*u^>n«
laye» -E n d o s p e r m
SXych*
#ndOSO«^TT'
Sc uf €*>-"■
PVjfTWi'l
p £ m b r yO
Rod<c!«
Epibiov
S l* r
limmot
Roeh.llo
L i t e r a t u r e d e a l i n g w i t h the n u t r i t i o n a l v a l u e of rice
stabilization of rice b r a n wi ll be d i s c u s s e d in d e t a i l in
t h e f o l l o w i n g chapters.
milling is to r e m o v e t h e h u l I s and b r a n a n d p r o d u c e m i l l e d
respectively. Both v e r t i c a l a n d h o r i z o n t a l a b r a s i v e m i l l s
polished s u rface.
/ Tc^r ^
^ A M A S lV E SURFACE
— U l u LAYER
•ENDOSPERM
Abr as i ve M i l l i n g F r i c t i o n Mi 11ing
q u a l i t y a n d n u t r i t i o n a l value.
There ar e t w o o t h e r typ es of m i l l i n g w h i c h e x i s t s in
re sp e c t i v e l y .
bran played in b a k i n g w o u l d be t o i n c r e a s e fi b e r an d lo w e r
w h i c h h a v e b e e n s u g g e s t e d by B a r b e r a nd B e n e d i t o de B a r b e r
G o o d q u a l i t y ric e b r a n tha t w a s s t a b i l i z e d a n d p a c k e d
s y n t h e t i c v i t a m i n s w e r e availa bl e , is still e n c o u n t e r e d in
1987).
S i g n i f i c a n c e of t h e C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f R i c e B r a n
o n its S t a b i l i t y
H i s t o l o g i c a l Co m p o s i t i o n :
r e a c t i n g w i t h lipases. T h e r e s u l t s ar e oil d e t e r i o r a t i o n .
B e c a u s e m o s t b r a n p a r t i c l e s are v e r y fine, th is m i x t u r e is
d e g r a d a t i o n r e a c t i o n of b r a n oil is v e r y high.
Chemical Composition:
c o m p o s i t i o n v a r y w i t h i n a w i d e range. In gene r al , r e s ul ts
Chemical Constituents:
T he d i e t a r y fib er c o n t e n t in b r a n h a s bee n s t u d i e d by
P r o t e i n s a n d O t h e r N i t r o g e n Co mp o u n d s : O n t h e whole,
w i t h p o s i t i v e charges.
E f f e c t i v e s t a b i l i z a t i o n c a n be a c h i e v e d by e i t h e r r e m o v i n g
f a t t y a c i d d e t e r m i n a t i o n s can be c o n d u c t e d by r o u t i n e A A C C
a l s o an e x c e l l e n t s o u r c e of v i t a m i n E . However, b r a n from
Physical P r o p e r t i e s of R i c e Bran:
Br a n has a d e n s i t y of 3 6 . 8 - 4 0 . 0 g / 1 0 0 c m 3 , or 2 3 - 2 5 l b / f t 3
(Houston, 1972). T h e s e v a l u e s v a r y d e p e n d i n g on d i f f e r e n t
milling pr o ce s s e s . In a b r o a d e r extent, th e b u l k d e n s i t y
t y p e ; (2) There is no c l e a r r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n f i ne n es s
s l i g h t l y h i g h e r s t a r c h c o n t e n t t h a n bran, ar e n e a r e r thos e
fo r m i l l e d ri c e (Houston, 1972). T he e q u i l i b r i u m m o i s t u r e
c o n t e n t of b r a n w a s r e p o r t e d at r a n g e s f r o m 4.6 to 5.3% at
e t c . ; s p e c i f i c g r a v i t y g r a d i e n t t u b e m e t h o d for i m p e r v i o u s
b u s h e l w e i g h t d e t e r m i n a t i o n r e c o m m e n d e d b y t he U S D A (198 3)
a l s o be u s e d as a m e t h o d to o b t a i n the p o r o s i t y index of a
Da y (1964) d e s c r i b e d a s i m p l e d e v i c e to d e t e r m i n e the
porosity of agricultural materials which involves the
d e t e r m i n a t i o n s , respec ti ve ly .
p a d d y r i c e and b r o w n r i c e is r e l a t i v e l y s t a b l e b e c a u s e oil
Pakistan, 1978).
n o t be e f f e c t i v e l y s t a b i l i z e d in a s h o r t time a f t e r it has
s t a b i l i z i n g p r o c e d u r e s c a n be de ve lo pe d.
L i p a s e Enzyme:
t u r e and t i m e of t r e a t m e n t as well as on m o i s t u r e c o n t e n t ,
f o l l o w e d by drying.
Dry-Heating Methods:
h e a t i n g of bra n at t e m p e r a t u r e s r a n g i n g f r o m 7 0 ° C to 200° C
R e d u c t i o n of m o i s t u r e to less th a n 11% p r e v e n t e d g r o w t h of
microorganisms in bran.
c o n v e y e r a n d f l u i d i z e d bed.
oil.
1 05 ° C w a s r e p o r t e d to c a u s e e f f e c t i v e s t a b i l i z a t i o n for 20
second in t h e f l u i d i z i n g c o l u m n at 110° C is r e p o r t e d t o be
h a r d e n i n g of the bran.
R e t a i n e d M o i s t u r e H e a t i n g Methods:
described: s e a l e d r o t a t i n g d r u m and e x t r u s i o n c o o k i n g .
through an open vent. The vent was then sealed and the
d u r i n g s t o r a g e of t h e s t a b i l i z e d b r a n for 70 days.
e x t e r n a l heat, c o o k by c o n v e r t i n g th e m e c h a n i c a l e n e r g y of
s t a b i l i z a t i o n on an e x t r u s i o n c o o k e r and fou nd t h e o p t i m u m
higher c o s t .
A d d e d M o i s t u r e Heating;
heat.
S c r e w C o n v e y e r s - In th is ty p e of h e a t i n g t r ea t me nt s,
a b o u t 10 0°C by e i t h e r st e a m j a c k e t i n g or i n s u l a t i o n of the
if a g i t a t i o n is inadequate.
I r r a d i a t i o n a n d its A p p l i c a t i o n for
Irradiation is a p r o c e s s w h e r e i n foods a r e e x p o s e d to
v a r i e t y of s p e c i f i c e f f e c t s , w h i c h i n c l u d e : d e s t r u c t i o n of
(Urbain, 1986).
m a g n e t r o n m a y or m a y not be included.
larger i n s t a l l a t i o n s .
Microwave heating is c a u s e d by th e d i s r u p t i o n of w e a k
m o m e n t c a u s e s so c a l l e d m o l e c u l a r friction', an d p r o v i d e s
h e a t to the o b j e c t .
e qu ip me nt .
t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n a n d a b s o r p t i o n of m i c r o w a v e e n e r g y b y the
o bjec ts . T i m e - t e m p e r a t u r e p r o f i l e s w i t h i n th e p r o d u c t are
M i c r o w a v e H e a t i n g in t h e Foo d Industry:
(Anonymous, 1977).
in c o n t i n u o u s equipment, p a r t of w h i c h is or c o u l d be us ed
Co. ,1981) .
(T r i b o l i u m c o n f u s u m ) in w h e a t w e r e s e l e c t i v e l y d estroyed.
t o w a r d m i c r o w a v e h e a t i n g today.
pouches.
t h e w h o l e b r a n b o d y c o u l d b e expected.
i n a c t i v a t i o n of b r a n l i p a s e by m u l t i p l e r e g r e s s i o n
p r o d u c t i o n of m a g n e t r o n s h a s ma d e it e c o n o m i c a l l y f ea si bl e
h e a t i n g m e t h o d s to internal m i c r o w a v e h e a t i n g is o b v i o u s l y
reasonable.
C H A P T E R III
chapters. In o r d e r for t h e b r a n t o be f u l l y u t i l i z e d on a
and is o u t l i n e d in F i g u r e m - i ;
obtaining b r a n ;
(2) p r o x i m a t e a n a l y s i s of bran;
42
F i g u r e IIX-1. S c h e m a t i c D i a g r a m for R i c e B r a n S t a b i l i z a t i o n
P a r t i c l e Size.
Stabilization Bul k D e n s i t y
Treatments Porosity
P a r t i c l e D e ns it y
S p e c i f i c Hea t
Th. D i f f u s i v i t y
£
T h . Conductivity
1
Heating N o n - h e a t ing
I
E x te rn al Internal
f 1— t
Oven Steam Microwave 6 o Co
Drying Retorting Heating Irradiation
Stabilized Bran
Storage
Free F a t t y A c id s
Color
T
Product Analysis
Nutrients
♦
r ,7 —
i Heating i
f
tEf f iciencyi Statistical Analysis
‘ Analysis !
~SZ -
S e l e c t i o n of T r e a t m e n t
\
Optimization of Selected Treatment
43
(3) determination of physical an d t h e r m a l properties
of bran;
heating;
(5) s t a b i l i z a t i o n of b r a n w i t h g a m m a i r r a d i a t i o n as a
n o n h e a t i n g method;
(6) s t o r a g e of s t a b i l i z e d bran;
s t a b i l i z a t i o n t r e a t m e n t u s e d ; and
(8) s t a t i s t i c a l a n a l y s i s of t h e d a t a for r e c o m m e n d i n g
t r e a t m e n t of rice bran.
losses.
a v a i l a b i l i t y wa s the l i m i t i n g factor.
i m p o r t a n c e t o t h e i r p a r t i c u l a r regions. Unfortunately, it
r i c e v ar ie ti es , cultivated within L o u i s i a n a be s e l e c t e d as
scale in th i s region. In o r d e r t o m a i n t a i n t h e e f f e c t of
unknown variables in b r a n s a m p l e s on t r e a t m e n t r e s u l t s to
b r o u g h t to ou r l a b o r a t o r i e s for f u r t h e r m i l l i n g w a s Known.
Sheller P ea r le r
’-■g
h e l p of a magnif ie r, a c c o r d i n g to the m o r p h o l o g i c a l traits
Proximate Analysis
Moisture:
m i n e d b y t h e h e a t i n g p r o c e d u r e d e s c r i b e d by R a n d a l l et al.
content.
w e r e c a l c u l a t e d on a d r y w e i g h t basis.
C r u d e Protein:
of 6.25 w a s a p p l i e d to c a l c u l a t e t h e p e r c e n t protein.
Crude F a t :
h o u r s u s i n g h e x a n e as the e x t r a c t i n g solvent.
C r u d e Fiber:
s ma l l q u a n t i t y of a s b e s t o s w a s p l a c e d at th e b o t t o m of the
Ashing:
g r e y c o l o r ash w a s obtained.
N - f r e e Extract:
Particle Size:
P a r t i c l e size d i s t r i b u t i o n of b r a n s a m p l e s w a s d e t e r
Bulk Density:
D e t e r m i n a t i o n of b u l k d e n s i t y w as d o n e a c c o r d i n g to a
Porosity:
v o l u m e to tot a l v o l u m e of the c o n t a i n e r a n d e x p r e s s e d as a
percentage.
Particle Density:
Particle density of bran samples was determined by
p o r o s i t y de t e r m i n a t i o n .
S p e c i f i c Heat:
p e r c e n t a g e c o m p o n e n t s of the b r a n w i t h t h e i r c o r r e s p o n d i n g
1971):
where
Cp = s p e c i f i c heat;
X f = % fat;
X s = % solid;
X m = % moisture.
F i g u r e 1 1 1-3. A p p a r a t u s to M e a s u r e S p e c i f i c H e a t
53
WATER HEA T E R
B A TH
STIR R E R
\
FO OD -
SAM PLE
FULL
LENGTH
PROBE
THERMOCOUPLES
STAINLESS
STEEL
TUBE
A * R2
a = ------------------- ( E q u a t i o n . I I 1-2)
4 (Tr - T 0 )
where
R = r a d i u s of t h e r m a l d i f f u s i v i t y t u b e (inch);
the t u b e (°C).
Thermal Conductivity:
(Singh, 1982):
a = --------------------
n • CP
( Equat io n III-3)
where
o = bulk density ( l b /f t3 )
Stabilization Treatments
t h e t r e a t m e n t s a r e d e s c r i b e d below:
Oven Drying:
S t e a m R e to rt in g :
On e h u n d r e d g r a m s of b r a n w a s s p r e a d on a flat p l a t e
f a c i l i t y w a s p l a c e d at an i n c l i n e d angle.
Microwave Heating:
s t a b i l i z a t i o n by m i c r o w a v e heating:
(1) E x p e r i m e n t design:
C o m b i n a t i o n s of th r e e independent variables i n c lu d in g
a c c o r d i n g t o th e mod el g i v e n as follows:
Y = B0 + B XX X + B 2 X 2 + B3 X3
+ B 12x lx 2 + B 13X 1X 3 + b 2 3 x 2x 3
+ BU X! 2 + B2 2 X2 2 + B3 3 X3 2 ;
(Equ at io n III-4)
Table III-l. Experimental Design of Microvave Heating
for Rice Bran Stabilization
Levels
activity);
interactions.
by th e t - t e s t as:
where
S .D. = standard d e v i a t i o n ;
(2) P e r o x i d a s e assay:
P e r o x i d a s e a c t i v i t y w a s u s e d as a q u i c k indicator
0.05 0.1 25 a b s o r b a n c e u n i t s
2 10 gram
* ------- * 25
50 25
(Equa ti on III-6)
(3) M i c r o w a v e heating:
intervals.
10.8% for m e d i u m g r a i n b r a n s by a d d i n g a s u f f i c i e n t a m o u n t
of water.
m e t h o d c i t e d by R h e e and Y o o n (1984).
Irradiation:
an i r r a d i a t i o n d o s a g e of 1 megarad.
Sample Analyses
2°C an d 75 + 5% to s i m u l a t e the h i g h l y u n f a v o r a b l e s t o ra ge
t h e FFA c o n t e n t d e t e r m i n a t i o n w a s c a r r i e d out a c c o r d i n g to
d i s p e r s i n g the l ip i d r e s i d u e in 75 ml of i s o p r o p y l a l c o ho l
fo l l o w e d by 75 ml of 0.04% p h e n o l p h t h a l e i n in 95% e t ha no l
i z e d 0.04% p h e n o l p h t h a l e i n in 95% e t h a n o l w a s a l s o t i t r a t
e x p r e s s e d on a d r y - w e i g h t basis.
Color Determination:
cont ro l. T h e L, a, and b r e a d i n g s on t h e c o l o r d i f f e r e n c e
(Senter et a l , 1984):
63
e = t a n -1 * b/a ( Eq u a t i o n I I I - 7 )
S.I. = ( a 2 + b 2 ) 1/ 2 (Equa ti on I I I - 8 ) .
Statistical Analysis
graphs.
O v e n D r y i n g an d St e a m Retorting:
retorting.
e x p e r i m en ta l a pp ar at us by w h i c h the t e m p e r a t u r e changes of
Microwave Heating:
Insulated Box
Insulator
Rice Bran
O'.
ATi
Aluminum Foil
Covered Board
Plastic *-rr*r-Thermocoupl e
Container "A
Rice Bran
Aluminum Foil
Covered Board
(T>
CTi
mass. A specially designed extrapolation method (Nelson
m e n t and t e m p e r a t u r e s m e a s u r e d t h e r e a f t e r w e r e r e c o r d e d by
a t t a i n e d by the t r e a t m e n t as s h o w n in F i g u r e III-7.
68
T15
Time Elapsed
110
IDE
(°C)
1DO
E s t i m a t e d Bran T e m p e r a t u r e
Temperature
o —
at the End of M i c r o w a v e H e a t i n g O^ ,
Bran
F i g u r e 1 1 1 -7. D e t e r m i n a t i o n o f M i c r o w a v e H e a t e d
B r an T e m p e r a t u r e by E x t r a p o l a t i o n
C H A P T E R IV
RESULTS A N D DISCUSSION
p r o p e r t i e s a n a l y s e s ; (4) e f f e c t of s t a b i l i z a t i o n t r e a t m e n t
discussed in t h i s chapter.
H i l l i n g of R o u g h R i c e
C o m m e r c i a l m i l l i n g of ro u g h rice in the p r o d u c t i o n of br an
the p r e - h a r v e s t h a n d l i n g and p r o c e s s i n g co n d i t i o n s .
69
Table IV-1. Average Percent Bran Yield from Milling of Rough Rice
Replicate Millings
Moisture ---------------------------
Rough Rice (%) 1 2 3 Average
bran.
Proximate Analysis
Grain Type
Component
(*) Long Medium Difference t value P
Moisture:
m a y be a t t r i b u t e d to a h i g h e r m o i s t u r e c o n t e n t in the long
1972). T h e m o i s t u r e c o n t e n t o f b r a n in t h i s investigation
test) s h o w e d no s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e in m o i s t u r e c o n t e n t
Crude Protein:
16.07% and 16.20% on the dry base for long and medium
bran processed in c o m m e r c i a l m i l l s .
Crude F a t :
i n v e s t i g a t i o n s h o w e d t h a t lon g g r a i n a n d m e d i u m g r a i n ric e
Fiber, A s h an d N - f r e e Extract:
p a r t i c l e si z e d i s t r i b u t i o n of b r a n ar e p r e s e n t e d in T a b l e s
IV-4 and IV-5 and Figures IV-1 and IV-2. In Table IV-6
conductivity.
76
Table IV-4. Particle Size Distribution of Whole Bran3
% Retained on Screen
□ L o n g G r a i n Ri ce tiedi urn G r a m R i ce
[ %)
on Screen
Retained
Percent
Size Group
F i g u r e IV-1. P a r t i c l e S i ze D i s t r i b u t i o n of W h o l e B r a n
P a r t i c l e S i z e (mm):
=* 0 . 8 4 B: 0 . 8 4 - 0 . 5 9
0.59-0.42 D: 0 . 4 2 - 0 . 2 5
0.25-0.18 F: 0 . 1 8 - 0 . 1 5
■*= 0 . 1 5
0.84 mm. Percent of bran retained for that group w as
t h e m i l l i n g process.
tr u e b r a n w e r e m o r e s i m i l a r than t h o s e of th e w h o l e brans'
as is s h o w n in F i g u r e I V - 2 .
B u l k Density:
% Retained on Screen
a fraction II only.
81
Da
□ L o n g G r a i n Ri ce M e d i u m G r a i n R i ce
50
4D
(%)
on Screen
30 -
Retained
20 ■
10
Percent
Size Group
F i g u r e IV-2. P a r t i c l e S i ze D i s t r i b u t i o n of T r u e Bran
P a r t i c l e S i z e (mm):
> 0 .4 2 B: 0.42-0.25
0.25-0.18 D: 0.18-0.15
-= 0 . 1 5
Table IV-6. Effect of Grain Type on Physical Properties of True Bran
Grain Type
Long Medium
Properties (Leraont) (Nato) Difference t Value P value
Bulk Density
lb/ft3 18.20 17.17 1.03 1.9606 0.1380
Particle Density
lb/ft3 67.60 61.20 6.40 1.9391 0.1380
Porosity
% 73.00 72.10 0.90 1.5119 0.2069
Specific Heat
Btu/lb °F 0.41 0.41
Thermal Diffusivity
ft2/hr x 10“3 5.17 5.29 - 0.12 0.8892 0.4359
Thermal Conductivity
Btu/hr ft °F x 10*2 3.85 3.72 0.13 2.2083 0.1194
00
ro
rice bran ar e 19.9 lb/ft3 (Barber an d B e n e d i t o de Barber,
40 0.590-0.420 17.46b
60 0.420-0.250 18.11^
_Q
CO
P a r t i c l e S i z e (mm)
F i g u r e I V -3- R e l a t i o n s h i p of Bulk D e n s i t y to P a r t i c l e
S i z e in T r u e B r an
Table IV-8. Relationship of Moisture Content to Bulk Density of True Bran
9.7 19.103c
12.7 19.473°
15.5 19.823°
19.4 20.963b
23.6 21.963a
00
<ri
87
Bfi
(lb/ft^)
20
Density
Bulk
15
5 ID 15 25
M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t (%)
F i g u r e IV -4. R e l a t i o n s h i p o f M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t to Bulk
D e n s i t y in T r u e Bran
Table IV-9. Effect of Moisture Content on Bulk Density
at Indicated Particle Sizes of True Bran
Moisture
(%)
00
00
89
26
0.42-0.25 mm * ^0.25mmn + 0.59-0.42 mm
2D - - * -
(lb/ft^)
+ + ' "
Density
15
Bulk
10
ID 16 26
Moisture Content {%)
F i g u r e IV-5. E f f e c t o f M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t on Bulk D e n s i t y
o f T r u e B r an at I n d i c a t e d P a r t i c l e Size s
a f f e c t t h e b u l k d e n s i t y u p to 15.5% m oi st ur e. B e y o n d this
q u a n t i t y of he a t g i v e n or r e c e i v e d is g i v e n by:
Q = M - C p -AT
where
Q = tot al h e a t t r a n s f e r r e d (Btu);
Cp = s p e c i f i c h e a t (Btu/lb ° F ) ;
M = mass (lb);
fore, Q « p .
d e c r e a s i n g the p a r t i c l e size.
Porosity:
p a r t i c l e density, i. e.
V o _____
vt
where
V Q = v o i d volume;
V.£ = total v o l u m e
an d c is a d i m e n s i o n l e s s n u m b e r and is e x p r e s s e d as a
percentage.
P o r o s i t y is an i m p o r t a n t p r o p e r t y of a m a t e r i a l w h i c h
results in i n c r e a s e d e f f i c i e n c y in th e t h e r m a l process.
respectively.
40 0.590-0.420 77.19a
60 0.420-0.250 72.29b
80 0.250-0.177 66.13d
ro
Table IV—11. Relationship of Moisture Content to Porosity of True Bran
Moisture
(*)
9.7 12.7 15.5 19.4 23.6
Particle
U.S. Size Porosity
Sieve No. (mm)
60
BD
75
(*)
Porosity
70
65
00
□ 2 G 4 6 8
P a rticle Size ( x lO- * mm)
F i g u r e I V - 6. R e l a t i o n s h i p of P a r t i c l e S i ze to P o r o s i t y
in T r u e Bran
96
BD
7B
76
(%)
74
Porosi ty
72
70
ID 16 2D 25
M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t (%)
F i g u r e IV-7. R e l a t i o n s h i p o f M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t to P o r o s i t y
in T r u e Bran
97
en
□ 0.59-0.42
B6
BG
(%)
75
Porosity
70
65
16 2D 26
M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t (“ )
F i g u r e IV-8. E f f e c t o f M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t on P o r o s i t y of
T r u e B r a n at I n d i c a t e d P a r t i c l e S i z e s
fractions were collec te d. The variation of porosity in
e x p r e s s e d v i s u a l l y as in F i g u r e IV-6.
Br an p o r o s i t y at d i f f e r e n t m o i s t u r e c o n t e n t s was al s o
pores.
for particle size smaller than 0.25 mm. However, for the
99
in p a r t i c l e size.
P a r t i c l e Density:
of b r a n c o l l e c t e d from b o t h k i n d s of r i c e w e r e e s s e n t i a l l y
similar in c o m p o s it io n.
v a l u e s w a s no t s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t (p > 0.05).
of p a r t i c l e d e n s i t y by n e a r l y 24%.
S p e c i f i c Heat:
Moisture Content
<*)
IDG
a B u lk D e n s i t y + Particle Density
{1b / f )
Density
—A — A
A-
6 ID 16 2D 26
M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t (%)
the c o m p o n e n t e i t h e r a d d e d or r e m o v e d for f u r t h e r p r o c e s s
processing.
it ca n be s e e n t h a t the e x p e r i m e n t a l v a l u e s c l o s e l y a g r e e d
reliable.
Thermal Diffusivity:
Specific Heat
(Btu/lb °F)
Moisture Content
( * ) Calculated Experimental
103
104
ID
g a Expt. V a l u e + C a l . Value
°F)
7
10"1 Btu/lb
5 - - +
4
(x
Heat
3
Specific
Q
6 ID 16 2D 26
M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t (%)
F i g u r e IV-10. C o m p a r i s o n o f C a l c u l a t e d Vs E x p e r i m e n t a l
V a l u e s of S p e c i f i c H e a t of T r ue B r an
105
t h e r m a l d i f f u s i v i t y b e t w e e n t h e s e two k i n d s of bran.
sample i n c r e a s e s w i t h t i m e as follows:
a 2t a 2t a2T
_3 T_ _ C =
9 t a x2 3y
9 y22 az2 (l )
In c y l i n d r i c a l c o o r d in at e s. Equation 1 becomes
3T 32T 1 aT 1 92T 3 2T
By d i s a l l o w i n g t e m p e r a t u r e g r a d i e n t s p a r a l l e l to the axi s
of t he cylinder, it m a y be t a k e n that
a 2t
3 Z2 ,
w h e r e the t e m p e r a t u r e d i f f e r e n c e a r o u n d t h e c i r c u m f e r e n c e
is zero. Th e n
a2t
2 °
90
w hich follows
at a2 t i aT
at ar2 r a r (3) .
106
C o n s t a n t C b e i n g t e m p e r a t u r e gradi en t, then
A 3 2T 1 3T
a 3 r2 r 3 r {4) .
where
A = constant temperature in c r e a s e r a t e ;
t^ = t e m p e r a t u r e at t h e t i m e 1;
t Q = initial t e m p e r a t u r e ;
0 = t i m e t r an si en t;
r = radius;
T = temperature.
B e c a u s e T / r is no long er t i m e - d e p e n d e n t , Equation 4
becomes
d 2T 1 dT A
dr2 r dr a (5),
a n d its s o l u t i o n is
A r2
T + Cl In (r) + c2 (6) .
4 a
T h e b o u n d a r y c o n d i t i o n s to be a p p l i e d to E q u a t i o n 6
are
T = At = TR (r > 0, r = R)
107
dT
= 0 (r > 0, r = 0)
dr
w h i c h lead to
A
T R - T = ----- (R2 - r 2 ) (7)
4a
T a k i n g r = 0 g i ve s
A R2
4 (T r - T0 ) (8).
where
T r = ° C at c i r c u m f e r e n c e of tub e = 6 0 ° c ;
T 0 = °C at t h e c e n t e r of tu b e = 44°C.
It w a s e x p e r i m e n t a l l y o b s e r v e d tha t r e g a r d l e s s of the
70 i-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- l
1
__, Ca
. OO O u t s i d e Central
□ Central
,□
A = ((6600°°CC--2266°°CC))//4488 m mi ni n == 00..66°°CC//mmiinn;; D
BO ■ 9 -D —T„
aa =
= ((AA--RR22)/4
)/4■ (T
■ ( rT -p -T T0 0) ) == 00..00113322 i ni Vn m2 /min;
in; ‘R
R
BE - TVr = OOuuttssiiddee b r a n tteemmppeerraattuurree;;
T = CCee nt
ntrraall bran tteemmppeerraattuurree.. „n '
50- 0 □
a'
.□' /°
{°C)
45 ' rt'' T
— T,
-□ ,o 0
, □
Bran Temperature
40 - □
-D
35- P' „o X
30 -
a
2 6 ?r '
o----- O '-- -----
O
0 Q I ■ ■ ■ ‘__________ I___________I >------------ 1--------1------------1 - --------1---------- 1------------ 1 I-
□ 4 8 12 IB 20 24 2B 32 36 40 44 48 B2 6B 90
T i m e (min)
F i g u r e IV-11. T i m e - T e m p e r a t u r e Data f o r T h er m a l D i f f u s i v i t y
D e te r m i n a t i o n
109
t h e r m a l d i f f u s i v i t y b o t h changed. Thermal d i f f u s i v i t y w as
0.05).
Thermal Conductivity:
x 10“2 for long grain rice and medium grain ric e bran,
Moisture Content
(%) 9.7 12.7 15.5 19.4 23.6
Thermal Diffusivity
in2/min X 10‘2 1.06 1.27 1.49 1.57 1.64
Particle size
(n ) 0.60-0.84 0.42-0.60 0.25-0.42 0.18-0.25 0.15-0.18
Thermal
Diffusivity
(in2/min X 10- 2 ) 1.01 1.06 1.06 1.22 1.23
c o m p o n e n t s of b r a n e x c e p t the moisture.
other variables:
K = 0.16 13 8 + 0 . 0 0 6 2 8 M - 0 . 0 0 9 4 5 p - 0-03Cp ;
a = 0.0 43 8 + 0 . 0 0 0 8 4 M - 0 . 0 02 22 p - 0.0148Cp .
p e n e t r a t i n g a b i l i t y of t h e heat s o u r c e r a t h e r t h a n on hea t
Moisture K
P ->
% lb/ft3 Btu/fb °F ft2/hr io-3 Btu/hr ft °F 10 "2
R i c e b r a n s t a b i l i z e d by four d i f f e r e n t t r e a t m e n t s w as
s t a b i l i z a t i o n tr ea tm e nt s.
Storage
(weeks)
0 1 2 3 4
1DD
♦ M i c r o w a v e Heating 0 Gairana I r r a d i a t i o n
(!)
- -<>
Content
Acid
Fatty
Free
o ----
0 2 3 A
S t o r a g e T i m e (weeks)
F i g u r e IV-12. F r e e F a t t y A c i d C o n t e n t o f S t a b i l i z e d T r ue
B r a n D u r i n g S t o r a g e ( L emont)
Bran: L o ng G r a i n Rice.
S to ra q e : T e m p e ra tu r e , 33 t 2°C;
Rel. H u m i d i t y , 75 + 5%.
Table IV-19. Regression Analysis for FFA Changes Resulting from
Different Stabilization Treatments (Lemont)a
Treatment
t h e o t h e r t w o k i n d s of s t a b i l i z e d b r a n s (P < 0.05).
r e t o r t e d b r a n a n d t h e m i c r o w a v e h e a t e d w a s no t s i g n i f i c a n t
t r e a t m e n t s w e r e all h i g h l y s i g i n i f l e a n t (P <0.01).
h o u r s d e c r e a s e d the ra t e of e n z y m a t i c h y d r o l y s i s of fat in
its m o i s t u r e content.
ase t e s t c a n not be s u b s t i t u t e d t o e x p r e s s b r a n s t a b i l i z a
v a l u e of one p e r c e n t a g e p o i n t in c r e a s e in e x t r u s i o n c o o k e d
1985).
F ur t h e r m o r e , th e m i c r o w a v e stabilized b r a n wa s found
d i d no t incr ea s e as it d i d in o v e n d r i e d bran.
s h o w a n y s t a b i l i z i n g effect. T h e d a t a on F F A f o r m a t i o n in
d o s a g e s d o e s not s e e n p r a c t i c a l .
F FA c h a n g e s of raw a n d s t a b i l i z e d m e d i u m g r a i n (Nato)
resulting from d i f f e r e n t s t a b i l i z a t i o n t r e a t m e n t s .
v a r i a t i o n w i t h i n t r e a t m e n t effects.
M o is tu re :
Th e e f f e c t of s t a b i l i z a t i o n t r e a t m e n t s o n e q u i l i b r i u m
a n d I V — 15 w h i c h s h o w the e f f e c t of s t a b i l i z a t i o n t r e a t m e n t
o n EM C of bran.
Storage
(weeks)
0 1 2 3 4
BO
60
Content
40
Acid
30
Fatty
20
Free
10
0
0 2 3 4
S t o r a g e T i m e (weeks)
F i g u r e I V - 13. F r ee F a t t y A c i d C o n t e n t of S t a b i l i z e d T r u e
B r an D u r i n g S t o r a g e (Nato)
Bran: M e d i u m G r a i n Rice.
S t o r a g e : T e m p e r a t u r e , 33 + 2°C;
R e l , H u m i d i t y , 75 t 5%.
Table XV-21. Regression Analysis for FFA Changes Resulting from
Different Stabilization Treatments (Nato)a
Treatment
Oven Steam
Control Drying Retorting
Storage
(Weeks)
0 1 2 3 4
Storage
(Weeks)
0 1 2 3 4
^ M i c r o w a v e Heating + Irradiation
(?)
Content
Moisture
Q—
Equilibrium
D 2 3 4
S t o r a g e T i m e (weeks)
F i g u r e IV-14. E f f e c t o f S t a b i l i z a t i o n T r e a t m e n t s on
Equilibrium Moisture Content of True
B r an D u r i n g S t o r a g e (Lemont)
Bran: L o n g G r a i n Rice.
St or a g e : T e m p e r a t u r e , 33 * 2°C;
R e l . H u m i d i t y , 75 t 5%.
128
^ M i c r o w a v e Heating
(*)
Content
Moisture
n
In
Equilibrium
□ 2 3 4
S t o r a g e T i m e (weeks)
F i g u r e IV — 15. E f f e c t o f S t a b i l i z a t i o n T r e a t m e n t s on
Equilibrium Moisture Content of True
B r a n D u r i n g S t o r a g e (Nato)
Bran: M e d i u m G r a i n Rice.
S t o r a g e : T e m p e r a t u r e , 33 t 2°C;
R e l . H u m i d i t y , 75 t 5%.
129
t h i r d week. N o c h a n g e in th e E M C o c c u r r e d a f t e r th e t h i r d
week (Figure I V - 1 4 ) .
t h e E M C b e t w e e n c o n t r o l b r a n s of long a n d m e d i u m g r a i n ma y
p o r o s i t i e s b e t w e e n t h e s e t w o k i n d s of bran.
a n d th e y w e r e i n d e p e n d e n t of t r e a t m e n t m e t h o d s .
leads to t h e c o n c l u s i o n t h a t s t e a m r e t o r t i n g a n d m i c r o w a v e
Bran Color:
meter, are shown in Table IV-24 for long grain bran and
T a b l e I V — 25 for m e d i u m g r a i n bran.
Al l h e a t t r e a t m e n t s c a u s e d s i g n i f i c a n t d e c r e a s e s of L
l ig h t t a n to d a r k brown.
treatments in d i c a t e i n cr ea se s in r e d n e s s a n d y e l l o w n e s s of
s i g n i f i c a n t at the 5% level.
c o m p a r e d to u n t r e a t e d bran.
Table IV-24. Means of Hunter Color Values of Heat Stabilized Bran (Lemont)3
V a l u e s of b r a n c o l o r s a t u r a t i o n in d e x w e r e c a l c u l a t e d
m i c r o w a v e h e a t i n g c h a n g e d the SI v a l u e t h e l e a s t .
Nutritional Impact:
u n t r e a t e d bran.
value.
l o w e s t c r u d e p r o t e i n content. T h e p r o t e i n c o n t e n t of tha t
content between oven dried bran and the three others were
However, a d v e r s e e f f e c t s of m i c r o w a v e h e a t i n g on food
d e s t r u c t i o n of n u t r i e n t s u n d e r m i c r o w a v e h e a t i n g are still
not clear, it w o u l d be m e a n i n g f u l to s t u d y t h e e f f e c t s of
m i c r o w a v e h e a t i n g on b r a n n u t r i t i o n a l p r of il es .
r e s u l t s are g i v e n in T a b l e IV-28.
1985).
14 1.40 35.5
20 0.84 18.7
30 0.59 10.1
139
Table IV-29. Heat Penetration Data of Oven Dried Rice Brana
Heating Time
( min )
0 30 60 90 120
6 23 26 31 39 44
9 23 24 25 27 36
Heating Time
( min )
0 1 2 3 4 5
6 23 48 52 55 59 63
9 23 24 26 27 27 28
2DD
180 cm 3 cm 6 cm
160 cm
140
(°C)
Bran Temperature
*
_ - —
D 3D 00 DO
H e a t i n g T i m e (min)
F i g u r e IV — 16. H e a t i n g C u r v e s of O v e n D r i e d T r u e Bran
O v e n D rying; 135°C,
143
150
o 6 cm
135
9 cm
IDE
(°C)
Bran Temperature
-o
— o — —
o ----
o ---
o—
2
H e a t i n g T i m e (min)
F i g u r e I V - 17. H e a t i n g C u r v e s o f S t e a m R e t o r t e d T r u e Bran
S t e a m R e t o r t i n g : 121°C, 15 psi.
thickness of b r a n layer, hardly any meaningful changes in
retorting.
Heating is m u c h f a s t e r in r e l a t i o n t o p o w e r wattage.
Heating Time
( min )
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 23 57 77 94 99 105
145
146
135 * 3 cm D 6 cm
120
Q l-0
n
{° C )
Bran Temperature
A?
W
0 2 3 4 6
H e a t i n g T i m e (min)
F i g u r e IV-18. H e a t i n g C u r v e s of M i c r o w a v e H e a t e d T r u e Bran
M i c r o w a v e H e at i n g : 340 w a t t s , 2 4 5 0 MHz.
Table IV-32. Comparison of Thermal Efficiency
of Treatment Methods3
Heating Time
(min)
1 2 3 4 5
Microwave 6 34 63 79 79 91
Heating 9 33 65 77 80 99
Steam 6 25 29 32 36 40
Retorting 9 1 3 4 4 5
M i c r o w a v e h e a t i n g h as an a d d i t i o n a l a d v a n t a g e of r e s u l t i n g
in a h i g h e r t h e r m a l e f f i c i e n c y b e c a u s e t h e init ia l w a r m - u p
3 min.
Treatment Selection
n o n - h e a t i n g metho ds . M i c r o w a v e h e a t i n g of b r a n r e s u l t e d in
IV-34.
r e s p e c t iv el y. T h e low es t re s i d u a l p e r o x i d a s e w a s o b t a i n e d
149
Table IV-33. Effect of Microwave Heating Treatments on
Residual Peroxidase Activity in Rice Bran
Dependent Variable
Independent Variables
Residual
Trial Moist. Bran Height Time Peroxidase Activity
No. Xx(%> X 2 (g) X 3 (sec) Y <%)
CK — — — -------- — — 3. 12 1 0 0 .0
1 0.38 12 . 1
2 1 -1 -1 0.12 3.7
3 -1 1 -1 1.78 57 . 0
4 1 1 -1 0.21 6.6
5 —1 —1 1 0.12 3.7
6 1 1 0 .08 2 .5
7 -1 1 1 0. 24 7.7
8 1 1 1 0.11 3.6
9 - 1 .6 82 0 0 0.37 11.7
10 1 .682 0 0 0.09 2.9
11 0 -1.682 0 0 . 18 5.7
12 0 1.682 0 0. 19 6.0
13 0 0 -1.682 2 .64 84 .6
14 0 0 1.682 0.11 3 .5
15 0 0 0 0.23 7.4
16 0 0 0 0.20 6.3
17 0 0 0 0. 19 6.1
18 0 0 0 0. 19 6.1
19 0 0 0 0.16 5.0
20 0 0 0 0.19 6.1
150
Table IV-34. Regression Analysis of Residual Peroxidase
Activity of Microwave Heated Bran
Constant 8.375**
XiX2 -7.292**
*1*3 8.708**
*2*3 -6.917**
V -1.625
x22 -6.625**
X32 12.875**
m i c r o w a v e h e a t i n g p e r i o d s equal t o or l o n g e r t h a n 2 0 0 sec,
i m p o r t a n t t o bra n s t a b i l i z a t i o n by m i c r o w a v e h e a t i n g .
s i g n i f i c a n t l y a f f e c t e d re s i d u a l p e r o x i d a s e a c t i v i t y (Y) of
s i m i l a r to t h o s e r e p o r t e d by Rh e e and Y o o n (1984).
E f f e c t s of b r a n m o i s t u r e on s t a b i l i z a t i o n w a s f u r t he r
b r a n s t a b i l i z e d by m i c r o w a v e h e a t i n g d u r i n g the s t o r a g e is
presented in F i g u r e IV-20.
1DDQ
jo 12% M o i s t u r e □ 21% M o i s t u r e
{ %)
A c t iv it y
Peroxidase
ED 100 200
H e a t i n g T i m e (sec)
F i g u r e IV-19. E f f e c t of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t on P e r o x i d a s e
A c t i v i t y of B r a n S t a b i l i z e d by M i c r o w a v e
Heati ng
155
12% M o i s t u r e 21% M o i s t u r e
(%)
Content
Acid
Fatty
Free
2 4
S t o r a g e T i m e (weeks)
F i g u r e IV-20. E f f e c t of M o i s t u r e C o n t e n t on F r e e F a t t y
A c i d s o f B r an S t a b i l i z e d by M i c r o w a v e
Heati ng
156
re s i d u a l p e r o x i d a s e a c t i v i t y t e s t r e s u l t s fou n d t h e s l o p e s
of tw o c u r v e s w e r e s i g n i f i c a n t l y d i f f e r e n t (p < 0 .0 1 ) w i t h
by m i c r o w a v e heating.
m o i s t u r e a n d s t a b i l i z e d by m i c r o w a v e h e a t i n g c a n be s t o r e d
bran with 21% moisture had 150% less FFA than bran with
the 2 1 % level.
CHAPTER V
m a y hav e a b e n e f i c i a l e f f e c t on l o w e r i n g s e r u m c h o l e s t e r o l
industry.
oxidative r e a g e n t s p r o d u c i n g u n p l e a s a n t r a n c i d f l a v o r s and
essential.
157
158
p r o x i m a t e c o m p o s i t i o n and p h y s i c a l and t h e r m a l p ro p er ti es .
i n v e s t i g a t i o n s h o w e d t h a t the v a l u e s on a d r y - w e i g h t b a s i s
54%) .
l b / f t 3 ); thermal c on d uc ti vi ty , 3 . 72 - 3 . 8 5 x 10 -2 Btu/hr ft
°F ( 1 . 5 - 2 .8 x 1 0 -2 B t u / h r ft ° F ) ; and t h e r m a l di ff us iv i ty ,
to 1 megarad.
at each tested period, the less stable the bran was and
subjected.
changes in i nd u st r i a l pr o ce s s e s , e q u i p m e n t an d p ro du ct s .
f u r t h e r reduced.
LITERATURE CITED
A n o n y m o u s , 1987. L o u i s i a n a S u m m a r y : A g r i c u l t u r e a n d N a t u r a l
R e s o u r c e s . L o u i s i a n a C o o p e r a t i v e E x t e n s i o n Service,
L o u i s i a n a S t a t e Univ. Agr. Ctr. Bat on Rouge, LA. p.
200.
161
162
B r y g i d y r , A . M . , R z e p e c k a , M. a n d M c C o n n e l l , M. B. 1977.
C h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n and d r y i n g of t o m a t o p a s t e foam by
ho t a i r and m i c r o w a v e energy. Can. Inst. Food Sci.
Tech no l. J. 10(4): 313.
David, J.S.K., Rao, S.K., Rao, S.D.T. and Murti, K.S. 1965.
Q u a l i t y of b r a n oil as i n f l u e n c e d by c o n d i t i o n s of
s t o r a g e of rice b r a n . J . F o o d S c i . T e c h n o l . 2: 113.
164
K i e r e b i n s k i , C. 19 69. T e m p e r a t u r e c h a n g e s in m e a t h e a t e d by
microwave or cooked in water. Rocz. Technol. Chem.
Z y w n . , 15: 171.
Leonzio, M. 1966. T h e l i g n i n c o n t e n t of t h e p r i n c i p l e
b y - p r o d u c t s of rice. R i s o 15(3): 219.
O hlss on , T. 1983. L i t e r a t u r e s u r v e y of d a t a on t h e r m a l
p r o p e r t i e s of foods. In: M e t h o d s Measuring Thermal
Properties. Galliard (Printers) Ltd, G r e a t Yarmouth,
p. 314.
S h a s t r y , B.S. a n d R a g h a v e n d r a R a o , M. R. 1971. s t u d i e s on
ric e b r a n lipase. I n d i a J. Biochem. Biophys. 8(4): 37.
Vent ur a, B. 1974. R i c e b r a n u t i l i z a t i o n in t h e p r e v e n t i o n
an d t r e a t m e n t of d e n t a l d e c a y ( c a r i e s ) . In: P r o c . R i c e
B y - p r o d u c t s U t i l i z a t i o n . Int. Conf. II. Va le n c i a , 1974.
p. 215.
a u t h o r w a s a s i g n e d to H e i l o n g j i a n g A c a d e m y of A g r i c u l t u r a l
S cience, a n d he w o r k e d t h e r e un t i l he e n t e r e d t h e G r a d u a t e
1983. H e w a s a s s i g n e d to the Ch i n a N a t i o n a l R i c e R e s e a r c h
I n s t i t u t e and w o r k e d th e r e as a r e s e a r c h associate.
Philosophy in F o o d Science.
t h e y h a v e o n e daughter, L y n n Tao.
173
DO C TO R A L EXAM INATION AND DISSERTA TIO N R E P O R T
Candidate: J i a x u n Ta o
Title o f D i s s e r t a ti o n R i c e B r an S t a b i l i z a t i o n by I m pr o v e d
Internal a n d Ex te r n a l H e a t i n g M e t h o d s
Approved:
D e a n of th e G radi School
EX AMI NI NG C O M M I T T E E
___
Date of Examination:
A d H 1 14, 1989