Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
c. GI (Group Investigation)
Theoretical framework
Group investigation is cooperative learning model that most difficult to
implement. That's because learning is not only cantered on teacher but
students more directly involved in the planning of what topics will be
discussed and how the investigation process. In group investigation model,
teacher divided students into groups where each group consists of five until
six students are heterogeneous. The formation of groups in group
investigation model considering the familiarity of friendship or similar
interest in a specific topic. (Trianto, 2009: 79)
Social Situation
Role of teacher
Group investigation is a teaching model in which the teacher is the
facilitator and guide of learning. In the this model, the teacher’s role is
monitoring learning, challenging students' thinking, keeping students involved
during investigation process, monitoring or adjusting levels of challenge, and
keeping the process moving of investigation process.
Role of student
In group investigation model students plays a very important role in
teaching learning process because all of the activities ranging from planning,
investigation, until to present the results of an investigation conducted by the
students themselves with explore their understanding to find the result. In this
case the students work in groups and help each other so that the desired goal
can be achieved.
Syntax
Sharan, dkk. (1984) divide steps in the implementation of group
investigative model into six phases as follows:
- Choose a topic and form groups
- Cooperative planning
- Planning implementation
- Analysis and synthesis
- Percentage of final results
- Evaluation
E. Advance Organizer
Theoretical framework
Developed by Ausubel, advance organizers have been shown to be
effective in helping students understand an recall information by providing a
framework that represents the hierarchy and major concepts of a discipline or
subject (M.Dell'Olio & Donk, 2007). Advance organizers are model for helping
students organize information by connecting it to larger cognitive structure that
reflects the organization of the discipline itself (M.Dell'Olio & Donk, 2007). So,
learning theory that related with this theory is the combination of Ausubel’s
theory (meaningful learning), constructivist and social learning theory.
Social Situation
Students were active participants, sharing ideas and understanding. Some,
teacher may elect to limit student participation, other do not (M.Dell'Olio & Donk,
2007).
Syntax
- Read a text-based advance organizer orally to the students
- Add visuals to advance organizer
- Use concept maps or other forms of graphic organizer and advance organizer
- Teach the advance organizer and remind students to use it often
The result of analysis two different model of teaching based on the role of teachers as well as
the role of students in the implementation of the model.
1. Direct Instruction Model
Direct Instruction model refers to academically focused, teacher-directed
classroom instruction using sequenced and structured materials. It refers to teaching
activities where goals are clear to students, academically oriented, immediate
feedback to students, sufficient and continues time allocated for instruction as well as
enough practice for students. This model is applicable and the most logical way to
teach students both concepts and skills. It is lively and stimulating model of teaching.
(Kousar, 2009: 2012) Direct instruction model usually used in teaching declarative
knowledge and procedural knowledge. Declarative knowledge refers to cognitive
skill like memorize certain formula in learning mathematic, while procedural
declarative refers to psychomotor skill and have sequential steps like teaching how to
use drop pipette for the students. (Trianto in Arrends, 2009:42)
The role of teacher
Direct instruction model is a teaching model in which the teacher is the major
provider of information. In the this model, the teacher’s role is to pass on facts, rules,
or action sequences to students in the most direct way possible; this usually takes the
form of explanations, examples, and opportunities for practice and feedback (Brorich,
1999).
The role of students
Students’ roles are active in responding to teacher questions, analyzing
examples, and practicing skills to mastery.
Reference
Trianto, 2009. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Predana
Media Group
Kousar, Rubina. 2009. The Effect of Direct Instruction Model on Intermediate Class
Achievement and Attitudes. Pakistan
Joyle, Bruce; Weil,Marsha. 2003. Models of Teaching, New Delhi: Pearson Education
M. Dell’Olio, Jeanine & Donk, Tony. 2007. Model of Teaching: Connecting Student
Learning with Standards. Sage publication: California
Essay
Direct Instruction and Problem Based Model of Teaching
Models of teaching can be defined as instructional designs which describe the process
of specifying and producing particular environmental situation which cause the students to
interact in such a way that specific change occur in their behavior. (Joyce, 2003: 3) As a
teacher it is important to learn and understand the models of teaching that are already known.
By mastering the models of teaching, teacher will be facilitated in the implementation of
learning in classroom so that learning objectives can be achieved maximally. There are many
kinds of teaching models, two of them are direct instruction and problem based model. This
essay will briefly compare and contrast these models of teaching.
The direct instruction model refers to academically focused, teacher-directed classroom
instruction using sequenced and structured materials. It refers in teaching activities where
goals are clear to students and academically oriented (Kousar, 2009: 2012) Direct instruction
is well used in teaching declarative and procedural knowledge like memorize formula and
practice how to use an equipment. (Trianto, 2009:42) While, the problem-based model can be
described as one in which teacher direct students to learn identified content and process
through lecture and guided discovery, and then apply their knowledge to a well-structured
situation or problem to find meaningful solution. The problem given must be content relevant
and represent a real world situation.
The direct instruction and problem based model of teaching is significantly a different
model. But here, they still have several similarities. These models give an instructional design
for teacher to carry out the teaching-learning process optimally. Teachers are also directly
involved and guide the students during teaching learning process. The basic difference within
these teaching models is the approach involved in them. The direct instruction model belongs
to behaviorist approach pressing teacher as the center of learning while problem base model
belongs to constructivist approach pressing student as the center of learning. The process of
direct instructional basically involves the teacher telling students about the content they are
supposed to learn. In the problem-based learning, teacher uses a problem to teach concepts.
The aim of direct instruction is getting mastery. Every student should be able to perform
the skills independently. But here, students cannot learn to think critically, make logical
arguments like problem based model. The model aims to capable students solving their daily
life problem based on knowledge that they get during learning. Students can learn to think
critically, analyze information, communicate scientific ideas, make logical arguments, work
as part of a team, and acquire other desirable skills unless they are permitted and encouraged
to do those things over and over in many contexts (Hunter, 1984).
So, it can be concluded that the similarities of direct instruction and problem based
model of teaching are they give instructional design for teacher to teach and teachers are
directly involved as well as guide the students during teaching learning process. The
differences within these models of teaching are the approach involved in them, the process,
and the aim as well as the outcome of learning.
References
Trianto, 2009. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Predana
Media Group
Hunter, M. 1984. Knowing Teaching and Supervising. In P. Hosford (Ed.), Using What we
Know about Teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Alexandria,USA.
Kousar, Rubina. 2009. The Effect of Direct Instruction Model on Intermediate Class
Achievement and Attitudes. Pakistan