Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Gallery Frames
G.R. No. 189871, August 13, 2013, 703 SCRA 439
Doctrine : Promulgation of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Monetary Board Resolution No.
796 which lowered the legal rate of interest from 12% to 6%.
FACTS:
Dario Nacar filed a labor case against Gallery Frames and its owner Felipe Bordey, Jr. Nacar
alleged that he was dismissed without cause by Gallery Frames on January 24, 1997. On October
15, 1998, the Labor Arbiter (LA) found Gallery Frames guilty of illegal dismissal hence the Arbiter
awarded Nacar P158,919.92 in damages consisting of backwages and separation pay.
Gallery Frames appealed all the way to the Supreme Court (SC). The Supreme Court affirmed the
decision of the Labor Arbiter and the decision became final on May 27, 2002. After the finality of
the SC decision, Nacar filed a motion before the LA for recomputation as he alleged that his
backwages should be computed from the time of his illegal dismissal (January 24, 1997) until the
finality of the SC decision (May 27, 2002) with interest. The LA denied the motion as he ruled
that the reckoning point of the computation should only be from the time Nacar was illegally
dismissed (January 24, 1997) until the decision of the LA (October 15, 1998). The LA reasoned
that the said date should be the reckoning point because Nacar did not appeal hence as to him, that
decision became final and executory.
ISSUE:
RULING:
No. There are two parts of a decision when it comes to illegal dismissal cases (referring to cases
where the dismissed employee wins, or loses but wins on appeal). The first part is the ruling that
the employee was illegally dismissed. This is immediately final even if the employer appeals – but
will be reversed if employer wins on appeal. The second part is the ruling on the award of
backwages and/or separation pay. For backwages, it will be computed from the date of illegal
dismissal until the date of the decision of the Labor Arbiter. But if the employer appeals, then the
end date shall be extended until the day when the appellate court’s decision shall become final.
Hence, as a consequence, the liability of the employer, if he loses on appeal, will increase – this is
just but a risk that the employer cannot avoid when it continued to seek recourses against the Labor
Arbiter’s decision. This is also in accordance with Article 279 of the Labor Code.
Anent the issue of award of interest in the form of actual or compensatory damages, the Supreme
Court ruled that the old case of Eastern Shipping Lines vs CA is already modified by the
promulgation of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Monetary Board Resolution No. 796 which
lowered the legal rate of interest from 12% to 6%. Specifically, the rules on interest are now as
follows:
Except: When later on established with certainty. Interest shall still be 6% per annum demandable
from the date of judgment because such on such date, it is already deemed that the amount of
damages is already ascertained.
4. The 6% per annum rate of legal interest shall be applied prospectively:– Final and executory
judgments awarding damages prior to July 1, 2013 shall apply the 12% rate;– Final and executory
judgments awarding damages on or after July 1, 2013 shall apply the 12% rate for unpaid
obligations until June 30, 2013; unpaid obligations with respect to said judgments on or after July
1, 2013 shall still incur the 6% rate.