Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Leena Bruckner-Tuderman
Aimee S. Payne
AT-A-GLANCE
The adhesive structures in the skin include desmosomes, focal adhesions,
hemidesmosomes, basement membranes and dermal fibril networks.
Desmosomes are primarily responsible for epidermal adhesion.
The major components of desmosomes are
the desmosomal cadherins (desmogleins and desmocollins), plakins (desmoplakin,
envoplakin, and periplakin), and armadillo family proteins (plakoglobin and
plakophilins).
Hemidesmosomes are responsible for epidermal- dermal adhesion.
The hemidesmosomal components comprise plakin homologs, integrins, and collagenous
transmembrane proteins.
All basement membranes contain collagen IV, laminins, nidogens, heparan sulfate
proteoglycans, and fibulins.
Functional specificity of basement membranes is provided by additional tissue-specific
glycoproteins.
In addition to their structural roles, desmosomes, hemidesmosomes, and the epidermal
basement membrane are biologically active in cellular signaling.
The dermal-epidermal junction is continuous with the extracellular matrix in the papillary
dermis and thus attaches the epidermis with the dermis. The pliability and tenacity of the
dermis are provided by a highly organized extracellular matrix that is also biologically
active in cellular signaling.
Mutations in the genes encoding the above proteins cause hereditary skin diseases,
ranging from hypotrichosis and keratoderma to epidermolysis bullosa and Kindler
syndrome.
Protein components of desmosomes, hemidesmosomes, and epidermal basement
membrane are targeted in autoimmune blistering diseases of the pemphigus or
pemphigoid group.
INTRODUCTION
The cell–cell and cell–basement membrane adhesion in the epidermis, and the cell-
matrix adhesion in the der- mis provide the skin with its resistance against envi-
ronmental influences; epidermal integrity is required
for protection of the entire organism against mechani- cal, physical, or microbial
insults. The major cellular structures involved are the desmosomes at cell–cell
junctions in the epidermis and the hemidesmosome– basement membrane adhesion
complexes and related structures at the dermal–epidermal junction. Ultra-
structurally, the hemidesmosome closely resembles one-half of the desmosome;
however, at the molecu- lar level, these 2 structures are distinct. Both represent
specifically organized assemblies of intracellular and transmembrane molecules.
The desmosome anchors cytoskeletal filaments to cell–cell junctions, and the
hemidesmosome anchors cytoskeletal filaments of basal epithelial cells to the
basement membrane. Our knowledge of the desmosomal, hemidesmosomal, and
basement membrane molecules has expanded drasti- cally in recent years as a result
of the great power of both molecular genetics and proteomics. After kerati- nocyte
transmembrane proteins were initially identi- fied as autoantigens in pemphigus and
pemphigoid, a multitude of molecules have now been characterized at both protein
and gene levels, and their expression, regulation, and functions have been
discerned. The antigenic epitopes in different autoimmune blistering skin diseases
have been carefully mapped and, as of this writing, mutations in at least 24 different
genes have been shown to underlie heritable disorders of epidermal or epidermal–
dermal adhesion in humans and mice. This chapter will describe the morphologic,
molecular, and functional aspects of these adhesion structures.
EPIDERMAL ADHESION
Ultrastructure of Desmosomes
The desmosome (or macula adherens) is the major cell adhesion junction of the
epidermis, serving to anchor apposing keratinocyte cell surface mem- branes to the
intracellular keratin intermediate fila- ment network. Desmosomes are present in
almost all epithelial tissues, including the oropharynx, gut, liver, heart, lung,
bladder, kidney, prostate, thymus, cornea, and CNS, although the desmosomal
protein isoforms and intermediate filament proteins vary by cell type.1 The primary
role of desmosomes in epidermal cell adhesion is evidenced by the his- tologic
findings in epidermal spongiosis, or inter- cellular edema, in which adjacent
keratinocytes remain attached to each other only at desmosomal junctions (Fig. 15-
1). These “intercellular bridges” served as the earliest description of desmosomes
in tissues, their observation made possible with the advent of light microscopy in
the 19th century.2 The development of electron microscopy techniques in the mid-
20th century allowed for higher resolu- tion micrographs that revealed the
ultrastructure of these intercellular junctions. Even in the 21st century, the
desmosome still remains best defined by its electron micrographic appearance, with
an electron-dense midline in the intercellular space halfway between apposing
plasma membranes, sandwiched by 2 pairs of electron-dense cytoplas- mic plaques
(Fig. 15-2A).3 The intercellular space between plasma membranes was called the
des- moglea (from the Greek for “desmosomal glue”), because it was presumed to
provide the adhesion that kept cells together.4
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF DESMOSOMAL PROTEINS
In anchoring the cell surface to the intermediate fila- ment network, desmosomes
create a 3-dimensional scaffolding of proteins that extend from the cell surface all
the way to the nuclear envelope.
This scaffolding is critical to stabilize epithelia in the face of shear stress or external
trauma. Early morpho- logic studies led to the perception of the desmosome as a
static structure, a “spot weld” functioning only to maintain intercellular adhesion.5
Over the last 4 decades, the individual proteins comprising the des- mosome have
been biochemically characterized and cloned, shedding light on both the dynamic
nature of the desmosome structure and the diversity of desmo- somal protein
function.
Desmosomal proteins fall into 3 major categories: (1) desmosomal cadherins
(desmogleins and desmo- collins), (2) armadillo family proteins (plakoglobin and
plakophilins), and (3) plakins (desmoplakin, envoplakin, and periplakin).
Additional proteins, such as corneodesmosin, kazrin, Perp, ninein, Lis1, Ndel1, and
CLIP170, also have been localized to epidermal desmosomes.6-10 Immunogold
electron microscopy and cryoelectron tomography studies have further refined our
understanding of how these molecular components of desmosomes are ordered
within the desmosome ultrastructure11,12 (Fig. 15-2B). The desmosomal cadherins
are transmembrane pro- teins whose extracellular amino-terminal domains interact
to form the trans-adhesive interface between cells, represented by the electron-
dense midline of the desmoglea. Intracellularly, the outer dense plaque contains the
desmosomal cadherin cyto- plasmic tails, with plakoglobin and the desmopla- kin
amino-terminal domain bound approximately 20 nm from the plasma membrane,
and plakophilin, approximately 10 nm from the plasma membrane. Approximately
40 to 50 nm from the plasma mem- brane, the desmoplakin carboxyl-terminus
interacts with keratin intermediate filaments, producing the inner dense plaque. The
biochemistry, expression pattern, and diseases of each desmosomal compo- nent
are discussed in further detail next. Although the specific physiologic roles and
pathophysiologic mechanisms affecting many of the desmosomal proteins remain
under active investigation, current knowledge clearly indicates the importance of
des- mosomes and their components beyond just cell adhesion.
DESMOSOMAL CADHERINS
Desmogleins and desmocollins are part of the cad- herin superfamily of
transmembrane glycoproteins. Members of this superfamily, which includes the
adhe- rens junction protein E-cadherin, mediate calcium- dependent adhesion in a
variety of epithelial tissues. In humans, there are 4 desmoglein (Dsg) isoforms and
3 desmocollin (Dsc) isoforms, each with varying expression patterns within and
among epithelia.13-15 Within normal human epidermis, Dsg1, Dsg4, and Dsc1 are
expressed predominantly in the differentiated cells of the superficial epidermis,
whereas Dsg2, Dsg3, Dsc2, and Dsc3 are expressed more strongly in the basal
and/or suprabasal layers16,17 (Fig. 15-3). Among different epithelial tissues, Dsg1
and Dsg3 expression are largely limited to stratified squamous epithelia in the skin
and oropharynx, as well as thymic epithelial cells. Dsg3 is also strongly expressed
in squamous cell carcinomas and other head and neck cancers, where it has been
proposed as a potential molecular target for therapy.18 Dsg2 is the major
desmoglein isoform in most simple and transitional epithelia, as well as car- diac
myocytes.19 Dsg4 is prominent in desmosomes of the hair follicle, testis, and
prostate.20,21 The expression
pattern of the human desmocollins is less well charac- terized. In normal tissues,
Dsc1 expression is largely limited to skin and oral epithelia, whereas Dsc2 is more
widely expressed in most desmosome-containing epithelia and is the only
desmocollin isoform in cardiac tissue.13 Dsc3, like Dsg3, is most strongly
expressed in the stratified squamous epithelia of the skin and oropharynx,22
although UniGene data sug- gest weaker expression in a variety of other epithelial
tissues. Desmocollin switching has been described in colorectal cancer, with
downregulation of Dsc2 and upregulation of Dsc1 and Dsc3.23
The extracellular domains of the desmosomal cadherins consist of 4 cadherin
repeats plus an extracellular anchor domain, each separated by a calcium-binding
motif. All cadherins are synthesized as preproproteins, which include an amino-
terminal signal sequence and propeptide. The propeptide is thought to prevent
intracellular aggregation of newly synthesized cadherins within the secretory
pathway of the cell. Proprotein convertases in the late Golgi net- work cleave the
cadherin propeptide, thereby produc- ing the mature adhesive protein.24 Studies
comparing the crystal structure of desmosomal cadherins, as well as the structure
of desmosomes analyzed by cryo- electron tomography of vitreous sections
compared with the solution structure of the classical cadherins, suggest common
mechanisms of intercellular adhesion among the cadherin superfamily, in which a
conserved amino-terminal tryptophan residue on one cadherin molecule interacts
with a hydrophobic acceptor pocket in the first extracellular domain of another
cadherin molecule on a neighboring cell to form the trans- adhesive interface.25-28
Additionally, cadherins may participate in cis-adhesive interactions with cadherin
molecules on the same cell through their membrane proximal domains, which may
facilitate desmosome assembly. Desmosomal cadherins have been reported to
engage in both homophilic (ie, Dsg–Dsg or Dsc–Dsc) and heterophilic (ie, Dsg–
Dsc) interactions, although heterophilic interactions likely form the basis of epi-
dermal intercellular adhesion.28-31
The cytoplasmic domains of the desmosomal cadherins are less conserved.
Desmocollins have a full length “a” and a shorter “b” splice isoform. The
cytoplasmic domains of desmoglein and desmocollin “a” isoforms bind
plakoglobin, and some desmoglein and desmocollin isoforms may also directly
bind plakophilins32-34 (Fig. 15-2B). Increasing data suggest
that desmosomal cadherins are not just adhesive mol- ecules but may also actively
regulate intracellular signaling, transcription, and other cellular processes.1
Consistent with this, desmocollin 3-deficiency in mice causes embryonic lethality
at day 2, before implan- tation, indicating a central role for desmocollin 3 in early
tissue morphogenesis independent of its des- mosomal adhesive function.35
In dermatology, the desmosomal cadherins are best known for their role as
autoantigens in the immuno- bullous disease pemphigus (Chap. 52). The
desmoglein 3 gene was originally discovered and cloned because it was the
autoantigen in pemphigus vulgaris36,37 (Fig. 15-4A). Since then, all of the
desmosomal cadher- ins have been associated with human autoimmune, infectious,
and/or genetic diseases (summarized below and in Table 15-1).
Desmoglein 1: Desmoglein 1 is the target of pathologic proteolytic cleavage in the
infectious disor- ders bullous impetigo and staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome,
as well as the inherited ichthyosis associ- ated with Netherton syndrome (Chap.
47).38,39 Cleav- age of desmoglein 1 by staphylococcal exfoliative toxin occurs
between extracellular domains 3 and 4.40 Pathogenic autoantibodies to desmoglein
1 are found in pemphigus foliaceus, mucocutaneous pemphigus vulgaris, and
paraneoplastic pemphigus (Chaps. 52 and 53). Most pathogenic pemphigus
foliaceus auto- antibodies bind the first 2 extracellular domains of desmoglein 1,
overlapping sites that are critical for desmoglein intermolecular adhesion.41-43
Desmoglein 1 is also targeted in some cases of immunoglobulin A pem- phigus
(intraepidermal neutrophilic-type; Chap. 57).44 Autosomal dominant mutations
causing haploinsuffi- ciency of desmoglein 1 result in palmoplantar kerato- derma
(PPK; Chap. 49). The PPK is classically striate (Fig. 15-4B), occurring at sites of
greatest trauma or friction, but focal and diffuse forms also have been described.
Desmoglein 2: Desmoglein 2 has been implicated in human cardiovascular disease
as a cause of autoso- mal dominant arrhythmogenic right ventricular car-
diomyopathy (ARVC).48 The lack of skin phenotypes in affected patients indicates
that desmoglein 2 is not required for epidermal adhesion, likely due to com-
pensatory adhesion from other more highly expressed epidermal desmosomal
cadherin isoforms.
Desmoglein 3: Desmoglein 3 is the target of pathogenic autoantibodies in mucosal
and muco- cutaneous pemphigus vulgaris and paraneoplastic pemphigus (Chaps.
52 and 53). Most pathogenic auto- antibodies in pemphigus vulgaris target the
amino- terminal extracellular (EC1-2) domains of desmoglein 3, which are
involved in trans- and cis-adhesion.41,49-51 Because desmoglein 3 deficiency in
mice phenotypi- cally resembles autoimmunity to desmoglein 3 in mucosal
pemphigus vulgaris with oral suprabasal ero- sions, pemphigus autoantibodies are
thought to cause loss of desmosomal cadherin function.52 More recent research has
focused on signaling pathways activated after binding of pemphigus vulgaris
autoantibodies to
keratinocytes, as several biochemical inhibitors have been shown to prevent
blistering in a neonatal mouse passive transfer model53 (discussed in further detail
in Chap. 52). Desmoglein 3 is also targeted in some cases of immunoglobulin A
pemphigus (intraepidermal neutrophilic-type; Chap. 57).54
Desmoglein 4: Desmoglein 4 mutations have been described in rare autosomal
recessive forms of hypotrichosis and monilethrix.55-58 One patient demonstrated
transient scalp erosions during the first 2 weeks of life. Most of the mutations in
Dsg4 are frameshift or nonsense mutations that would be predicted to lead to
haploinsufficiency, although missense mutations also have been reported.59
Desmoglein 4 immunoreactivity can be observed in pemphigus vulgaris and
pemphigus foliaceus sera,58 but subsequent studies have attributed this to cross-
reactivity from Dsg1 autoantibodies.60
Desmocollin 1: Desmocollin 1 is the target of autoantibodies in subcorneal pustular
dermatosis-type immunoglobulin A pemphigus61 (Chap. 57).
Desmocollin 2: Like desmoglein 2, desmocollin 2 is mutated in both autosomal
dominant and recessive forms of ARVC, with no epidermal phenotype in affected
patients.62,63
Desmocollin 3: Desmocollin 3 mutations were found in one Pakistani kindred with
autosomal reces- sive hypotrichosis.64 Autoantibodies to desmocollin 3 also have
been found in pemphigus vulgaris patients, particularly those with vegetative
lesions.65-67
PLAKOGLOBIN
Plakoglobin (also known as γ-catenin) directly binds the cytoplasmic tails of the
desmogleins and desmocollin “a” isoforms, as well as E-cadherin, the major trans-
membrane protein of adherens junctions in epidermal keratinocytes.68,69 It is
expressed throughout all layers of the epidermis and is ubiquitously expressed in
all epithelia. Plakoglobin, like plakophilin, is a member of the armadillo gene
family, characterized by a conserved protein structure with head and tail domains
that flank multiple homologous arm repeats.70 Various domains of plakoglobin
modulate its binding to the desmosomal cadherins.71-73 Other domains bind to
desmoplakin, thus linking desmogleins and desmocollins to desmoplakin.74
Plakoglobin can also localize to the nucleus, where it may modulate gene
transcription by TCF/LEF family members.75,76 Although most depictions of the
desmo- some show both plakoglobin and plakophilin binding to desmoplakin,
biochemical studies suggest that these interactions are mutually exclusive.77
Likely, the arma- dillo family proteins play more dynamic roles in recruit- ment of
desmosomal proteins to the plaque, similar to α-catenin in adherens junctions.78,79
Plakoglobin mutations result in Naxos disease, an autosomal recessive syndrome
of diffuse PPK, wooly hair, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyop- athy,
the latter of which may present in late childhood to adolescence.80 Plakoglobin
mutations also have been identified in patients with isolated cutaneous disease with
normal heart development,81 as well as in a patient with lethal congenital
epidermolysis bullosa.82
DESMOPLAKIN
Desmoplakin exists in 2 RNA splice variants, desmo- plakin I and II.83,84 It is
unknown whether different isoforms perform different cellular functions, although
human disease mutations suggest that desmoplakin I is required for normal
desmosomal function.85 Desmo- plakin is part of the plakin gene family,86 which
includes the hemidesmosomal proteins bullous pemphigoid antigen 1 and plectin,
as well as envoplakin and peri- plakin. Similar to other desmosomal components,
des- moplakin is a modular protein, with different modules fulfilling different
functions. The central part of one desmoplakin molecule coils around the central
part of another to form a rod-like center. The amino-terminal head domain binds to
plakoglobin,74 and the carboxyl- terminal tail binds to keratin.87 Therefore,
desmoplakin
provides the major link between the keratin filaments and the desmosomal plaque.
Desmoplakin also plays a critical role in development independent of its func- tion
in desmosomes, as desmoplakin-null mice die early in embryogenesis at E6.5,
before desmosomes are formed.88
A broad range of desmoplakin mutations have been associated with human disease,
leading to vari- able phenotypic combinations of PPK (striate or dif- fuse), dilated
cardiomyopathy (left or right), wooly hair, nail abnormalities, and/or skin
blisters.59 Hap- loinsufficiency of desmoplakin leads to autosomal dominant striate
PPK.89 Autosomal recessive muta- tions in desmoplakin were described in 3
Ecuadorian families with Carvajal syndrome, consisting of diffuse PPK, wooly
hair, and arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy.90 A Naxos-like
syndrome of PPK, wooly hair, and ARVC occurs with the p.R1267X non- sense
mutation, which affects only the desmoplakin I splice isoform, indicating that
desmoplakin II is not sufficient to restore normal desmosomal function in
epidermis.85 Lethal acantholytic epidermolysis bul- losa (widespread
epidermolysis, generalized alopecia, anonychia, and neonatal teeth) was attributed
to com- pound heterozygous mutations in desmoplakin that caused loss of the
desmoplakin tail.91 Additionally, desmoplakin autoantibodies are observed in
paraneo- plastic pemphigus sera (Chap. 53).
PLAKOPHILINS
Plakophilins, like plakoglobin, can localize both to the plasma membrane as well
as the nucleus, although their function outside of desmosomal adhesion is not well
characterized. Plakophilins directly bind to desmopla- kin, and may also directly
bind keratins and some des- mosomal cadherins, which is thought to aid in
clustering and lateral stability of the desmosomal plaque.32,33,77 Plakophilin 1
also associates with the eukaryotic trans- lation initiation factor eIF4A1 in the
mRNA cap com- plex, where it functions to regulate translation and cell
proliferation.92 Plakophilin 1 and 3 are both expressed throughout the epidermis,
although plakophilin 1 is more predominant in basal compared to superficial
epidermal keratinocytes, and plakophilin 2 is only expressed in the basal epidermal
layer (Fig. 15-3).93-95
Mutations in plakophilin 1 cause ectodermal– dysplasia–skin fragility syndrome,
suggesting a role for plakophilin 1 in epidermal morphogenesis as well as
adhesion.96 Plakophilin 2 mutations are the most common cause of autosomal
dominant ARVC.97,98 Currently, there are no known human diseases associ- ated
with plakophilin 3.
OTHER DESMOSOMAL PROTEINS
Envoplakin and periplakin are desmosomal plaque proteins expressed in the
superficial layers of the epidermis. Both proteins incorporate into the cor-
neodesmosomes of the stratum corneum. Mice defi- cient in envoplakin, periplakin,
and involucrin do not demonstrate adhesion defects, but instead show impaired
desquamation and epidermal barrier function.99 Envoplakin and periplakin
autoantibod- ies are characteristic of paraneoplastic pemphigus sera (Chap. 53).
Corneodesmosin is a secreted glycoprotein that incor- porates into
corneodesmosomes and is also expressed in the inner root sheath of the hair follicle.
Heterozy- gous mutations in corneodesmosin are associated with an autosomal
dominant hypotrichosis simplex of the scalp.100 Loss of cohesion in the inner root
sheath and aggregates of proteolytically cleaved corneodesmosin around the hair
follicle are observed in scalp biopsies of affected patients.
EPIDERMAL–DERMAL ADHESION
Basement membranes underlie epithelial and endothe- lial cells and separate them
from each other or from the adjacent stroma. Another form of basement membrane
surrounds smooth muscle or nerve cells. The physi- ologic functions of basement
membranes are diverse: in the various organ systems they provide support for
differentiated cells, maintain tissue architecture dur- ing remodeling and repair,
and, in some cases, acquire specialized functions, including the ability to serve as
selective permeability barriers (eg, the glomerular basement membrane or the
blood–brain barrier) or acquire strong adhesive properties, like the basement
membrane at the dermal–epidermal junction, or that surrounding smooth muscle
cells, which provide the tissues resistance against shearing forces.101,102 All of
these characteristics are also used during develop- ment and differentiation of
multicellular organisms (Table 15-2).
Ultrastructurally, basement membranes most often appear as trilaminar structures,
consisting of a cen- tral electron-dense region, known as the lamina densa, adjacent
on either side to an apparently less-dense area, known as the lamina lucida. The
lamina lucida directly abuts the plasma membranes of the adherent cells. The
relative size of each of these regions var- ies in different tissues, among the
basement mem- branes of the same tissue at different ages, and as a consequence
of diseases. Basement membranes serve as substrates for the attachment of cells
and fix their polarity.103 Their continuity throughout the various organ systems
stabilizes the tissue orientations and provides a template for orderly repair after
injury. Major disruptions in the basement membrane result in the formation of scar
tissue and the loss of function in that area.
Different basement membranes contain both common and unique components. All
share a basic network structure to which specific macromolecules have been
appended. These molecules are responsible for the specialized functions of different
basement membranes. The basic constituents of these structures are collagen IV,
laminins, nidogens, and heparan sulfate proteoglycans, although the isoforms, the
polypeptide subunits, and their individual structures vary among species.
Basement membranes provide physical separation between epithelia and
their underlying extracellular matrices. This barrier is especially important in the
containment of tumors. With the exception of certain cells of the immune system,
nonmalignant cells sel- dom cross a basement membrane. In contrast, malig- nant
cells employ multiple mechanisms to migrate through the basement membranes.
Different base- ment membrane components and their receptors mediate the tumor-
cell binding, and the basement membrane dissolution can occur by diverse mecha-
nisms, including metalloproteases produced by the tumor cell.105 The absence of
distinguishable base- ment membranes in tumor biopsies is used as an indicator of
malignancy. These observations under- line the importance of the basal lamina as
an obstacle to cell migration.
By binding biologically active signaling molecules, basement membranes regulate
a multitude of biologic events. The constituent proteoglycans can bind growth
factors that can be released from the complexes. Thus, the basement membranes
are potent regulators of cell adhesion and migration, cytoskeleton and cell form,
cell division, differentiation and polarization, and apoptosis.
ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE DERMAL-EPIDERMAL JUNCTION
The dermal–epidermal junction is an example of a highly complex form of
basement membrane,104,106 which underlies the basal cells and extends into the
upper layers of the dermis (Fig. 15-5A). This basement membrane is continuous
along the epidermis and skin appendages, including sweat glands, hair follicles, and
sebaceous glands. The dermal–epidermal junction can be divided into 3 distinct
zones.107 The first zone con- tains the keratin filament–hemidesmosome complex
of the basal cells and extends through the lamina lucida to the lamina densa. The
plasma membranes of the basal cells in this region contain numerous electron-dense
plates known as hemidesmosomes. The intracellular architecture of the basal cells
are maintained by kera- tin intermediate filaments, 7 to 10 nm in diameter, that
course through the basal cells and insert into the des- mosomes and
hemidesmosomes. External to the plasma membrane is a 25- to 50-nm-wide lamina
lucida that contains anchoring filaments, 2 to 8 nm in diameter, originating in the
plasma membrane and inserting into the lamina densa. The anchoring filaments can
be seen throughout the lamina lucida but they are concentrated in the regions of the
hemidesmosomes. Thus, they appear to secure the epithelial cells to the lamina
densa.
The existence of the lamina lucida in vivo has been questioned.108 When the
ultrastructure of the basement membrane is evaluated after high-pressure preserva-
tion techniques, the lamina densa appears intimately associated with the epithelial
cell surface. When the dermal–epidermal junction is similarly prepared, no distinct
lamina lucida is seen (Fig. 15-5B). This sug- gests that the lamina lucida may result
from shrinkage of the cell surface away from the lamina densa due to dehydration.
The appearance of anchoring filaments spanning the lamina lucida may then result
from the firm attachment of constituents of the lamina densa at the hemidesmosome
that is subsequently pulled from the lamina densa by shrinkage. Regardless of its
actual occurrence in vivo, the evaluation of the lamina lucida by standard electron
microscopy techniques has allowed identification of specific structures that would
otherwise have been difficult to detect. In addition, the morphologic term lamina
lucida remains practical in the scientific communication and continues to be used.
humans.106,118 The 180-kDa bullous pemphigoid antigen 2, BP180 and the major
antigen in bullous pemphigoid (Fig. 15-9), is a transmembrane collagen known as
ligands α6 integrin and laminin 332.127 The 120-kDa ectodomain of collagen XVII
is shed from the cell surface by proteinases of the ADAM (a disintegrin- like and
metalloproteinase-containing) family through cleavage within the
cells,128 explaining why ablation of the mouse Col17a1 gene resulted in moderate
skin blistering, den- tal anomalies, and graying and loss of hair.128 Plectin, another
plakin homolog, is also a component of the hemidesmosome. 125 However, its
tissue distribution is not limited to hemidesmosome-containing basement
membranes. Mutations of plectin result in epidermoly- sis bullosa simplex with
progressive muscular dystro- phy and, in some cases, epidermolysis bullosa
simplex with pyloric atresia,118 indicating a role for plectin in the stability of cell–
basement membrane adhesion in a variety of tissues. One key component of the
hemides- mosome is the integrin α6β4.125 It has a high affinity for laminin 332
and is essential to integration of the hemidesmosome with the underlying
basement mem- brane. Mutations in either the α6 or β4 chains result in junctional
represents the most common class of matrix receptors.130 The α-subunit of the
integrin determines the ligand spec- ificity, but the affinity and the specificity seem
to vary.145,153 The outside-in-signaling can occur via dif- ferent mechanisms.
Cues from the extracellular matrix can induce receptor clustering on the cell surface
and thus induce cytoplasmic complex formation between the receptors and linker
molecules that bind to the cytoskeleton and thus modulate cell shape. Activa- tion
of different receptors by the extracellular matrix can also induce signaling via
several signal transduc- tion pathways, for example, the focal adhesion kinase
(pp125FAK)– or microtubule-associated protein (MAP) kinase-pathways that
regulate transcription, cell pro- liferation, or differentiation.145 Recently, it has
become clear that cells also sense and react to the stiffness of the surrounding
extracellular matrix. Integrins mediate the mechanosensation through binding
dynamics of different integrin types, activation of stretch-activated ion channels, or
unfolding of mechanosensitive pro- teins in focal adhesion complexes.130 In turn,
the stiff- ness of the dermal extracellular matrix is determined by the molecular and
suprastructural composition of the collagen, elastin, and microfibrillar networks
and the extrafibrillar matrix and its water content.156,157 All these matrix–cell
interactions regulate cell functions and are highly relevant not only under
physiologic conditions but also in pathologically altered dermis in, for example,
fibrosis or tumor stroma.158 For detailed information on this topic, the reader is
referred to excellent recent reviews.146,147,150,153,156
CONCLUSIONS
The epidermis and the dermal-epidermal junction are continuous with the
extracellular matrix in the pap- illary dermis. The cell–cell and cell–basement mem-
brane adhesion in the epidermis, and the cell–matrix adhesion in the dermis secure
the attachmenat of the 2 skin layers and provide the skin with its resistance against
environmental influences. The integrity of these adhesion structures is essential for
protection of the entire organism against mechanical, physical, or microbial insults.
This is indirectly demonstrated by human disorders in which cutaneous adhesion
struc- tures are targeted by either genetic mutations or by pathogenic antibodies that
perturb the functions of the target proteins, such as in epidermolysis bullosa or
pemphigus. Tremendous advances have recently been made in discerning the
molecular and func- tional details of epidermal and dermal adhesion and in
understanding the molecular pathology of skin fragility. This knowledge will
facilitate the design of biologically valid therapeutic approaches not only for rare
genetic and common autoimmune adhesion disorders but also for physiologic
processes such as skin aging.
Figure 15-1 Desmosomes are the primary cell adhe- sion junction in the epidermis. Epidermal
spongiosis, or intercellular edema due to inflammation, causes separation of keratinocytes, which
remain attached by intercellular bridges representing desmosomal junc- tions (arrows). (Image used
with permission from John Seykora, MD, PhD.)
Figure 15-2 Electron microscopic image (A) and simplified schematic diagram (B) of a desmosome
(drawing not to scale). Dg, desmoglea; dm, dense midline; dp, desmoplakin; dsc, desmocollin; dsg,
desmoglein; idp, inner dense plaque; kf, kera- tin filaments; odp, outer dense plaque; pg,
plakoglobin; pkp, plakophilins; pm, plasma membrane. (Electron micrograph used with permission
from Kathleen Green and with permission of Elsevier, adapted from Yin T, Green KJ: Regulation
of desmosome assembly and adhesion. Semin Cell Develop Biol. 2004;15:665.)
Figure 15-3 Expression patterns of desmosomal proteins in normal human epidermis. SC = stratum
corneum, SG = stratum granulosum, SS = stratum spinosum, SB = stratum basale.
Figure 15-4 Desmosomal proteins are pathophysiologic targets in human autoimmune and genetic
diseases. A, Indirect immunofluorescence on monkey esophagus with pemphigus serum that
contains autoantibodies to desmoglein 3. The cell surface–intercellular pattern staining is diagnostic
of pemphigus. B, Striate palmoplantar keratoderma is associated with haploinsufficiency of
desmoglein 1 or desmoplakin.
Figure 15-5 A, Ultrastructure of the human dermal–epidermal junction as visualized by transmission
electron microscopy after standard fixation and embedding protocols. af, anchoring filament; AF,
anchoring fibril; AP, anchoring plaque; BM, basement membrane; Hd, hemidesmosome; Ld, lamina
densa; Ll, lamina lucida. (Bar = 200 nm.) B, Ultrastructure of the human dermal–epidermal junction
by transmission electron microscopy following protocols using high-pressure fixa- tion and
embedding techniques. Note the dense character of both the basement membrane and the subjacent
papillary dermis. Anchoring filaments, anchoring fibrils, and anchoring plaques are not
distinguishable. (Both images used with permission from Douglas R. Keene, MD, Shriners Hospital,
Portland, Oregon.)
Figure 15-6 A, Representation of the networks formed by the ubiquitous components of the
basement membranes. Monomeric collagen IV (Col-IV) self-assembles into dimers and tetramers
that further aggregate into a complex lattice. Laminins self-polymerize into networks. Perlecan can
oligomerize in vitro, and the glycosaminoglycan side chains interact with the Col-IV framework.
Nidogen is thought to bind components of all 3 networks and also fibu- lins. Therefore, nidogen
plays a central role as a stabilizer of the lamina densa framework. Individual molecules are not
drawn to scale. (Drawing used with permission from Peter Yurchenco, MD, Robert Wood Johnson
Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA.) B, Rotary shadowing image of a quick-freeze, deep-etch
replica of Col-IV polymers. The replica shows an extensive, branching, and anastomosing network
with occasional globular structures (arrowhead), which can be visualized as a model for the structure
of the lamina densa. (Image B, used with permission from Toshihiko Hayashi, PhD, University of
Tokyo, Japan.)
Figure 15-7 A schematic representation of laminin mol- ecules. Each laminin is a heterotrimer of an
α, a β, and a γ chain. On the top, the classic prototype laminin 111 consisting of α1β1γ1 chains is
shown. The N-terminal short arm of each chain is free, the long C-termini fold to a coiled-coil and
form the long arm. The distal C-terminus of the α chain contains 5 globular LG domains, which har-
bor the integrin-binding site. Laminin 332 exists in 2 forms, 3A32 and 3B32. These represent splice
variants of the α chain, the short variant is 3A and the “full length” chain 3B. The N-termini of the
β3 and γ2 chains are proteolytically processed to yield mature laminin 332.
Figure 15-8 Model of the hypothetical relationships of molecules within the dermal–epidermal
junction basement mem- brane. The illustration depicts laminin 332 as the bridge between the
transmembrane hemidesmosomal integrin α6β4 and the collagen VII NC-1 domain. The tight
binding of laminin 332 to α6β4 and to collagen VII provides the primary resistance to frictional
forces. The transmembrane collagen XVII also participates in this stabilization, because its extra-
cellular domain also binds laminin 332. Within the epithelial cell, the transmembrane elements bind
the proteins of the hemidesmosomal dense plaque, bullous pemphigoid antigen (BPAG)1 and
plectin, which then associate with the keratins. Collagen XVII binds BPAG1, integrin α6β4, and
plectin, and integrin α6β4 binds plectin. The laminin 332–311 complex is shown within the
basement membrane between hemidesmosomes, bound by integrin α3β1, and associated with the
intracellular proteins kindlin-1, talin, and vinculin. This complex presumably maintains basement
membrane stability. In vitro, integrin α3β1, kindlin-1, talin, and vinculin, and another
transmembrane collagen, type XIII, are localized to the focal contacts, which may function as the
link between the basement membrane and the epithelial cortical actin network. In the lamina densa,
collagen IV and perlecan networks are stabilized by nidogen. Anchoring fibrils are secured to the
lamina densa by the NC-1 domain of collagen VII. The fibrils project into the dermis and either
terminate in anchoring plaques or loop back to the lamina densa. The anchoring fibril network binds
dermal fibrils, thus securing the adhesion of the lamina densa to the papillary dermis. None of the
molecules is drawn to scale.
Figure 15-9 Indirect immunofluorescence staining of human skin with a pemphigoid serum that
contains auto- antibodies to collagen XVII.
Figure15-10 SchematicrepresentationofcollagenXVIIand its ectodomain shedding. Collagen XVII
is a hemidesmo- somal transmembrane protein with an intracellular N-ter- minus. The extracellular
C-terminus (ectodomain) contains several collagenous subdomains (light pink) and intervening
noncollagenous sequences (purple). The ectodomain can be shed from the cell surface by
proteinases of the ADAMs (a disintegrin-like and metalloproteinase-containing) fam- ily,
themselves transmembrane proteins. Thus, the 180-kDa full-length molecule yields a shorter soluble
ectodomain of 120 kDa. The 180-kDa full-length molecule is the classic bullous pemphigoid
antigen-2, and the ectodomain is the 120-kDa linear immunoglobulin A (IgA) dermatosis antigen.
Further degradation of the C-terminus of the ectodomain results in the 97-kDa linear IgA dermatosis
antigen.
Figure 15-11 Skin fragility and blistering in dystrophic epi- dermolysis bullosa. Functional
deficiency of collagen VII as a result of mutations in the COL7A1 gene leads to trauma- induced
separation of the epidermis and the dermis. The blister roof is below the lamina densa, leading to
scar for- mation on healing of the blisters.