Rebeca-Potot Therefore, the undivided interest of Gervasia
G.R. No. L-20234 Rebaca should pass upon her death to her heirs December 23, 1964 intestate, and not exclusively to the TOPIC: PROBATE testamentary heir, unless some other valid will PETITIONERS: PAULA DE LA CERNA, ET AL., in her favor is shown to exist, or unless she be RESPONDENTS: MANUELA REBACA POTOT, ET AL., and the only heir intestate of said Gervasia. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS A decree of probate decree is conclusive on the PONENTE: REYES, J.B.L., J. due execution and the formal validity of the will subject to such probate. FACTS:
On May 9, 1939, the spouses, Bernabe de la
Serna and Gervasia Rebaca, executed a joint last will and testament in the local dialect whereby they willed that two parcels of land owned and acquired by them during their marriage together with all improvements thereon shall be given to a niece, Manuela Rebaca. Bernabe dela Serna died on August 30, 1939, and the aforesaid will was submitted to probate by said Gervasia and Manuela before the Court of First Instance of Cebu which, by Order of October 31, 1939, admitted it for probate. Upon the death of Gervasia Rebaca on October 14, 1952, another petition for the probate of the same will insofar as Gervasia was concerned was filed on November 6, 1952. For failure of Manuela R. Potot and her attorney to appear, the case was dismissed on March 30, 1954. The Court of First Instance declared the testament null and void, for being executed contrary to the prohibition of joint wills in the Civil Code, but on appeal by the testamentary heir, the Court of Appeals reversed, on the ground that the decree of probate in 1939 was issued by a court of probate jurisdiction and conclusive on the due execution of the testament.
ISSUE:
W/N the will may be probated.
HELD:
Admittedly the probate of the will in 1939 was
erroneous, however, because it was probated by a court of competent jurisdiction it has conclusive effect and a final judgment rendered on a petition for the probate of a will is binding upon the whole world. However, this is only with respect to the estate of the husband but cannot affect the estate of the wife; considering that a joint will is a separate will of each testator. The joint will being prohibited by law, its validity, in so far as the estate of the wife is concerned, must be reexamined and adjudicated de novo.