Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SUPREME COURT
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
10th Judicial Region
Branch 33
Butuan City
SIEGFREDO/WILFREDO
MANTALABA y HERMOSADA
Accused.
x- ---------------------- x
STATEMENT OF FACTS
ISSUE
10. With all due respect, the honorable judge did not even bother to
ask for a photograph of the alleged illegal drugs that was bought
from the accused. Neither did the deponent submitted a copy of
the same to the honorable judge. Elementary logic and prudence
would dictate that at the very least, a photograph of the
purchased illegal drugs would be shown to the honorable judge
to prove that the accused was indeed engaged in illegal drug
activity. Worse, there was no showing that the alleged
confidential informant was presented to the honorable judge to
corroborate the statements made by the deponent on the alleged
test-buy operation against the accused.
13. In the recent case of People vs. Stanley Maderazo, the Supreme
Court held that:
PRAYER
CHRISTIAN D. DERIGAY
Counsel for the Accused
M.C.L.E. Comp. No. IV-0021708
TIN: 428-708-196-000;
Roll No: 60035
IBP No. 048437/07-24-18
PTR No. 1101514C 09/07/18
Door 11, G/F, Plaza de Tavera Bldg., J. Camus Ext., Brgy 9-A, Davao City
NOTICE OF HEARING
GREETINGS:
Please submit the foregoing Motion for the consideration and approval
of the Honorable Court on July 22, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. or as soon as
counsel and matter may be heard.
Christian D. Derigay
EXPLANATION
(Pursuant to section 13, Rule 14, of the Rules of Court)
Christian D. Derigay