Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Parking Services
Executive Summary
2. Background
11. Performance
Executive Summary
The Annual report 2007/08 addresses matters in accordance with the Guidance
contained within the Department for Transport’s ‘Civil Enforcement Operational
Guidance to Local Authorities’
The Guidance states that each Enforcement Authority should produce an annual
report about their parking enforcement activities within six months of the end of each
financial year and that the report should be published.
This report outlines both on-street and off street parking enforcement activities for the
periods:
• 1/4/07-31/3/08
• 1/4/08-31/3/09
1. Purpose of the Annual Report
1.1 Under Section 55 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended by the
Traffic Management Act 2004, all English authorities must keep an account of all
income and expenditure in designated (i.e. on-street) parking spaces which are
in a Civil Enforcement Area, and of their income and expenditure related to their
functions as an enforcement authority.
1.2 Regulations and guidance confirm that in respect of off-street parking places i.e.
car parks), the term ‘’income and expenditure as enforcement authorities’’
includes that related to the issue of Penalty Charge Notices. It does not, for
example, include pay and display or permit/season ticket income or the direct
expenditure relating to collecting that income.
1.3 This annual report is intended to explain to the public and stakeholders how the
service is managed in Horsham District Council and to provide information
regarding its performance.
1.5 This report provides details of Horsham District Council parking enforcement
activity for the period: 1 April 2007 – 31 March 2008, 1 April 2008 -31 March
2009 and 1 April 2009-1 October 2009
2 Background
The objective of parking enforcement is to provide for clearer, safer roads and
pavements and to help deliver improvements for congestion, road safety, the
economy and environment. A further objective is to reduce illegal parking, abuse
of disabled and residents’ bays and to provide integrated on-street and off-street
parking management at a local level.
To deliver this, Parking Services operate 6 days a week between the hours of
07:30 and 18:30 with occasional additional hours worked outside of these core
hours to target specific issues.
The Parking Services Manager also leads the processing and office support
team who deal with all the back office function from Penalty Charge Notice data
entry to parking appeals and is responsible for car parks usage performance
data.
West Sussex County Council issue the ‘Blue Badge’ to disabled people to
facilitate convenient access and provide the holder with the ability to park on-
street where parking is normally restricted, for a period of up to three hours.
The District Council also provides a number of dedicated disabled bays off-street
to support participants of the scheme.
Frequent Civil Enforcement Officers’ patrols ensure that these bays are not
compromised by motorists who are not entitled to use them.
Nationally there is concern that misuse and fraudulent abuses of the schemes
occur, frequent ‘Blue Badge inspections are carried out by Civil Enforcement
officers under the powers of the Traffic Management Act and penalty charge
notices issued to those found to be misusing the provisions of the scheme.
Horsham District Council manages 10 car parks in the town centre, 1 park and
ride and 20 rural car parks:
The parking tariffs adopted by the Council are influenced by the need to support
the local economy and to cater for the diverse requirement of the public who use
the parking facilities, to either work, shop or partake in leisure and tourist
activities.
3 West Sussex County Council Back Ground to Parking Policies
National Policy
The Future of Transport White Paper, published in July 2004, set out a long-term
strategy for a modern, efficient and sustainable transport system backed up by
sustained levels of investment over 15 years. Effective management of the road
network is a key part of this.
The Traffic Management Act 2004 imposes an explicit duty on local authorities to
manage their network so as to reduce congestion and disruption and to appoint
a traffic manager.
The Act also provides additional powers to do with parking, including increased
scope to take over the enforcement of driving and parking offences from the
police and this is known as Civil Parking Enforcement (CPE).
West Sussex County Council (WSCC) is the highway authority for the county of
West Sussex and parking policies are integral to West Sussex County Council’s
transport strategy.
The second edition of the Department for Transport’s Full Guidance on Local
Transport Plans, published in December 2004, says that local authorities should
have policies aimed at tackling congestion and changing travel behaviour. These
policies include restricting and/or charging for car parking on street and the Local
Transport Plans are linked to the WSCC Integrated Parking Strategy.
All local authorities should have developed parking strategies covering on- and
off-street parking that are linked to local objectives and circumstances.
Traffic Regulation Orders are put it in place together with appropriate traffic signs
and road markings to show the public what the restrictions mean.
These strategies need to take account of planning policies and transport powers
and consider the appropriate number of total spaces, the balance between short
and long term spaces and the level of charges.
Local authorities have long been responsible for managing all on-street and
some off-street parking, whether directly or indirectly.
The relevant powers are in the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (RTRA). The
Road Traffic Act 1991 significantly changed the way that on-street parking
restrictions are enforced.
Before 1991, the police and traffic wardens were responsible for enforcement
and income from fixed penalty notices went to the Exchequer.
Local Policy
Each local authority in West Sussex has a clear idea of its parking policy and
what it intends to achieve by it. This applies whether or not an authority is
responsible for on-street enforcement.
They appraise their policies and objectives regularly and a parking policy review
is presently underway which is focusing on planning and strategic development
led parking policy, development across West Sussex involving the County
Council and all of its District and Borough partners.
West Sussex Civil Parking Enforcement authorities will also set and regularly
appraise the:
Whether or not they have Civil Parking Enforcement powers, authorities will
make sure that their parking policies are not only appropriate in terms of place
and time, but are properly underpinned by valid, up-to-date Traffic Regulation
Orders.
In addition all signs and lines have been surveyed by a qualified consultant and
corrections made where necessary before Civil Parking Enforcement has been
introduced.
Current policies which are being updated by WSCC in partnership with all the
West Sussex local authorities are the:
West Sussex authorities consult the public on their parking policies as they
formulate or appraise them.
They generally seek the views of people and businesses with a range of different
parking needs as well as taking into account the views of the police.
Once their parking policies are finalised they make them available to the public.
Explaining the context and the purpose of parking policies can increase public
understanding and acceptance. It can also help public acceptance of
enforcement.
All West Sussex Civil Parking Enforcement schemes are quality based and
information is readily available to help everyone understand that enforcement is
as fair, accurate and expeditious as possible.
and managing and reconciling the competing demands for kerb space of:
• Residents;
• Shops;
• Businesses;
• Visitors, especially where there are many tourist attractions and
hotels;
• Pedestrians;
• Delivery vehicles;
• Buses, taxis, private hire vehicles and coaches;
• Cars;
• Bicycles; and Motorcycles.
West Sussex County Council will appraise its parking policies, Civil Parking
Enforcement regimes and associated regulatory framework when reviewing the
Local Transport Plans
In addition it is the intention that all West Sussex Civil Parking Enforcement
authorities will appraise their parking policies when reviewing their Local
Development Framework or community strategies.
The intention is to take account of the information they collect as part of the
parking enforcement process.
Civil Enforcement Officers will be encouraged to contribute to this process
because they are in a unique position to identify changes to parking patterns, as
well as the District and Borough parking teams that sees the challenges and
representations and the reasons behind them.
West Sussex Enforcement Authorities - Financial Objectives
Raising revenue is not an objective of Civil Parking Enforcement, nor will West
Sussex Civil Parking Enforcement authorities set targets for revenue or the
number of Penalty Charge Notices they issue.
The judgement in R v LB Camden (ex parte Cran) made clear that the Road
Traffic Regulation Act 1984 is not a revenue raising Act and this is a useful
reminder in times of financial strain on local authority budgets.
Previous guidance from the Department for Transport said that local authority
parking enforcement should be self-financing as soon as practicable. This is still
a sensible aim, but a compliant application for Civil Parking Enforcement in the
Adur District has been granted, in the knowledge that the scheme may not be
self-financing. All other schemes in West Sussex are intended to be ultimately
self financing.
West Sussex CPE authorities have to bear in mind that if their scheme is not
self-financing, then they need to be certain that the deficit can be afforded from
within the existing funding arrangements.
The Secretary of State will not expect either national or local taxpayers to meet
any deficit and for this reason all Civil Parking Enforcement schemes in West
Sussex have clear mechanisms to manage any projected deficits.
4.2 On 23 January 2006, Horsham District Council took over responsibility for on-
street parking controls from the police. This Decriminalisation of Parking
Enforcement has been adopted by West Sussex County Council as Local
Authority Parking Enforcement (LAPE). Under LAPE, parking enforcement
transfers from criminal law to civil law.
4.3 On 31 March 2008 LAPE became Civil Parking Enforcement (CPE). The
enforcement powers changed from the Road Traffic Act 1991 to the Traffic
Management Act 2004 (part 6).
5.1 The majority of off-street parking provided in the District is owned and operated
by the District Council. Off-street parking policies, including charging regimes,
can complement the aims of reducing car use for travel to work whilst at the
same time creating more parking opportunities for shoppers and visitors, who
are vital to the economic vitality of the area.
5.2 In the case of Horsham town, the District Council has set a goal to accommodate
the majority of commuter parking, by motorists for whom there is no practical
sustainable alternative to the car, outside the built up area by providing one Park
and Ride site capable of serving the main routes into the town.
5.3 It is unlikely that there will be any significant increase in off-street parking
provision in the future because to do so would have the potential to increase
traffic congestion and associated pollution at peak times.
5.4 In the villages the District Council continue to monitor the use of its off-street
parking facilities to ensure that they offer the best benefit to the vitality of the
areas they serve and in particular to ensure that they serve shoppers and visitors
rather that onward commuters.
5.5 Non-payment of parking tickets are treated as a civil debt and recovered through
a bailiff.
5.6 Motorist who receive a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN), if they wish to challenge
the PCN, have the right of making Representation to an independent adjudicator.
5.7 Payment must be made within 56 days of the date on which the PCN was
issued. If, however, payment is made within 14 days then a 50% discount will be
applicable.
6 Civil Parking Enforcement (CPE)
6.1 Major changes in the way local authorities enforce parking came into effect on
the 31st March 2008 with the introduction of new Government regulations.
6.2 Under the new regulations this activity became known as Civil Parking
Enforcement (CPE) and Parking Attendants became known as Civil Enforcement
Officers (CEOs).
6.3 The new regulations, which form Part 6 of the Traffic Management Act 2004, are
designed to make parking enforcement more motorists friendly and represent the
most radical shake up of parking enforcement in England and Wales for many
years.
6.4 The new framework makes it clear that Local Authorities should not use parking
enforcement as a tool for raising revenue, and should not set targets for the
number of Penalty Charge Notices issued.
6.5 Local Authorities are also encouraged to allow officers to use more discretion
over when a Penalty Charge Notice is issued.
6.6 Local Authorities are able to issue lower penalties for less serious parking
contraventions and will have to include details of procedures for appeals on
Penalty Charge Notices.
6.7 Independent parking adjudicators also get more power, including the right to ask
Local Authorities to reconsider penalty charges where motorists have mitigating
circumstances.
6.8 The regulations introduce new parking contraventions that will allow Local
Authorities to issue Penalty Charge Notices to motorists that are double parked
or parked across a dropped footway e.g. pedestrian crossing.
7.1 Within the 205 square miles of the Horsham District, Horsham District Councils’
Civil Enforcement Officers (CEOs) will issue penalty charge notices (PCNs) for
most non-endorsable parking contraventions.
7.2 There are two levels of Penalty Charges depending on the severity of the
contravention. The higher band is £70 (reduced to £35 if paid within 14 days)
and the lower band is £50 (reduced to £25 if paid within 14 days).
7.3 If payment is late, the penalty charge increases to £105 (higher band) and £75
(lower band). This may be more if the District Council has to pursue the debt
through the use of bailiffs.
7.4 CEOs are not allowed to accept payment and are under strict instructions that,
once a PCN has been issued, it cannot be withdrawn.
7.5 CEOs do not have quotas or targets for issuing PCNs: their job is simply to get
drivers to obey the parking control measures and to issue a PCN if they believe
that a contravention has taken place
West Sussex
RH12 1RL
9.1 West Sussex County Council do not believe that there is a recognised need to
routinely undertake removal of vehicles contravening the parking restrictions in
the early stages of the new parking enforcement scheme.
9.2 However, the Horsham District Council may, in the future, decide to invoke its
statutory powers to remove vehicles that are in contravention of parking
regulations where it is considered a traffic safety hazard exists which endangers
other road users.
10.1 In order to deliver Horsham District Council corporate vision the Council has
adopted a set of values which it aims to apply consistently across all its activities.
10.2 Our parking enforcement policies and procedures help deliver against these
values
11 Performance
Enforcement (total,
except where
specified)
Number of PCNs issued £10,486 10,714
Average monthly 96% 99%
compliance with the
parking regulations
Average monthly Not available 1132
number of deployment
hours
Average monthly 2
number of supervisors in
employment
Average monthly 6 6
number of trained CEOs
in employment
Number of complaints 0 3
% of PCNs issued at the (67%) 6948 (59%) 6313
lower level
% of PCNs issued at the (33%) 3536 (41%) 4393
higher level
Number of PCNs paid (65%) 6812 (59%) 7229
(incl. some from
previous year)
% of PCNs paid at (54%) 5701 (59%) 6281
discount rate
% of PCNs against (29%) 3030 (32%) 3431
which an informal
challenge was made
% of informal challenges (57%) 1720 (58%) 2004
accepted
% of informal challenges (43%) 1310 (42%)1427
rejected
Ave number of days 3 3
taken to respond to
informal challenge
Legislative requirement 14 14
for number of working
days to respond to
informal challenge
% of PCNs going onto (22%) 2284 (17%) 1813
Notice to Owners
% of PCNs against (1%) 102 (1.1%) 127
which a formal
representation was
made
% of formal (26%) 27 (35%) 44
representations
accepted