Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
RECOMMENDATIONS:
(i) Approve the Parking Enforcement Operations – Annual Report 2008/2009 as set out
or amended.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Parking Enforcement Operations – Annual Report 2008/2009 is attached for the
Executive to consider and amend as appropriate.
The Annual Report addresses the matters specified in the Secretary of State’s Statutory
Guidance including the performance of the service.
The Statutory Guidance under the TMA 2004 states that “Reporting is an important part of
accountability. The transparency given by regular and consistent reporting should help the public
understand and accept Civil Parking Enforcement”.
Surrey County Council (Highways) is producing an On Street Annual Report covering all
eleven boroughs and districts. The report will cover their Transportation Policies as well
as the figures and data regarding On Street Enforcement.
EXECUTIVE Agenda Item: 5
10 September 2009 Parking Enforcement Operations – Annual Report 2008/09
STATUTORY POWERS
1. The Secretary of State has published Statutory Guidance (February 2008) to Local
Authorities on the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions. The TMA 2004
requires at section 87 that enforcing authorities must have regard to the information
contained in the guidance. The guidance states that each Enforcement Authority
should produce an annual report about their enforcement activities within six
months of the end of each financial year. The report should be published.
2. The report should cover the financial, statistical and other data (including any
parking or Civil Parking Enforcement (CPE) targets) set out in the Guidance.
ISSUES
Public information
3. The report is required as part of the approach to improve transparency and public
understanding of the civil enforcement of parking controls and seeks to improve the
acceptance by the public of the enforcement regime.
4. It is intended that the report, once approved, will be available for the public to view
in Civic Offices, Libraries and published and through the Council’s website.
OPTIONS
6. The Executive may approve the report as set out or make amendments that are
consistent with the performance of the service and the statutory guidance.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
7. The approval and publication of the report allows the Council to comply with the
Secretary of State’s Statutory Guidance.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
8. The report sets out the financial reporting as required by the Statutory Guidance.
EQUALITIES IMPLICATIONS
9. None
OTHER IMPLICATIONS
10. Publication will be by way of mounting the report on the Council’s website.
11. The Parking Service plays an important part of making our town centre and villages
viable for the local retailers and businesses and allows visitors and residents to enjoy
the area.
CONSULTATION
12. There is no process that we are directed to under the Guidance for consultation and it
is considered that the report should be published as approved by Executive. The
Parking Manager will be consulting with Surrey County Council regarding the
release date of their On Street Enforcement Annual Report to ensure that where
possible both reports will be available simultaneously for residents to view.
POLICY FRAMEWORK
13. The provision of car parking and Civil Enforcement within the Borough’s Car Parks
and On Street is carried out under the provisions of the Traffic Management Act 2004
and the statutory guidance.
EXECUTIVE Agenda Item: 5
10 September 2009 Parking Enforcement Operations – Annual Report 2008/09
14. The impact of parking enforcement increases the availability of off street parking
spaces and reduces traffic congestion, improves air quality and the free flow of
traffic, and is a priority within the Council’s Corporate Plan.
Annual Report
Parking Enforcement Operations
2008-2009
1
EXECUTIVE Agenda Item: 5 – Annex
10 September 2009 Parking Enforcement Operations – Annual Report 2008/09
The availability of parking places, the use of parking restrictions and the enforcement of those
restrictions can be contentious issues, as no one likes to receive a parking fine. However, the impact of
parking enforcement increases the availability of off street parking spaces and reduces traffic
congestion, improves air quality and the free flow of traffic, and is a priority within the Council’s
Corporate Plan, and is even more important at this time of economic recession. I am also pleased with
the progress that the Council has made in Parking Enforcement and in particular with our Safer
Schools Partnership, which is involved in reducing congestion and improving road safety outside
schools.
The Council, working in partnership with Surrey County Council (Highways Authority), Surrey
Police and our partners will continue to enforce the waiting restrictions and parking bays in a fair and
equitable manner.
I hope that you will find the content of this report both interesting and informative.
2
EXECUTIVE Agenda Item: 5 – Annex
10 September 2009 Parking Enforcement Operations – Annual Report 2008/09
Contents Page
Introduction 2
Contents 3
Parking Enforcement – The Legal Background 3
On Street Parking Enforcement 4
Car Parks (Off Street) Parking Enforcement 4
Representations & Appeals 5
Appeals to the Independent Adjudicator 6
Car Parks Income & Expenditure 7
Summary 7
Abbreviations used & glossary of terms 8
The police service was increasingly unable to provide the resources necessary to either deal directly
with parking offences, or to fund and manage the traffic warden service. A number of police forces
indicated their support for another agency taking on responsibility for parking enforcement. The
consequences of the lack of enforcement, in terms of road safety and congestion, were deemed
unacceptable and, in order to address the problem, the Government introduced the Road Traffic Act
1991 (RTA 1991).
This enabled local authorities to establish Permitted Parking Areas and Special Parking Areas, within
which non endorsable parking offences would be decriminalised. Civil enforcement of those parking
contraventions could then be undertaken by parking attendants employed directly, or indirectly, by the
local authority. Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) could be issued for perceived breaches of the parking
restrictions within those areas and, unlike the previous system, the local authority would retain the
income from those PCNs to help fund their new enforcement operations.
The aim was that those decriminalised enforcement operations would in effect be self funding. Whilst
raising revenue was not to be an objective of enforcement, should their enforcement operations
produce a surplus of funds at the end of the financial year, those funds could be spent to either
improve off-street parking provision, or on specified transport related matters. Adoption of RTA 1991
powers was mandatory for London boroughs but optional for other local authorities. Following
consultations with the Surrey Police and with Surrey County Council (who are the local highways
authority), in order to further Surrey County Council's transportation policies through the effective
control of parking, Reigate & Banstead Borough Council (the Council), took on these powers on the
1st June 2004.
Surrey County Council is the local highway authority and, when enforcing on-street parking
restrictions within Reigate & Banstead, the Council carries out on street parking enforcement on
behalf of the County Council, under the terms of an agency agreement. Subsequently, the introduction
of the parking related sections of Part 6 of the Traffic Management Act 2004 (TMA 2004) on the 31st
3
EXECUTIVE Agenda Item: 5 – Annex
10 September 2009 Parking Enforcement Operations – Annual Report 2008/09
March 2008 again changed the legal framework. It widened the scope of local authority parking
enforcement, it aimed to introduce greater openness and professionalism within parking operations
and largely harmonised the regulations applicable to authorities inside London with those pertaining
to authorities outside of the Capital. Under the new Act decriminalised parking enforcement became
Civil Parking Enforcement, Permitted Parking Areas and Special Parking Areas became Civil Parking
Areas and Special Enforcement Areas and Parking Attendants were re-named Civil Enforcement
Officers (CEOs).
The new Act also introduced a higher and lower penalty charge depending on the contravention. The
Government accepted that the public viewed that indiscriminate parking on a yellow line should be a
higher penalty as opposed to a minor contravention of overstaying within a car park. Surrey County
Council (Highways Authority) and the eleven Borough & District Councils agreed to set the penalty
charge level at £70 & £50 respectively. A list of all the contraventions and the relevant penalty charge
can be found on the Council website.
The regulations accompanying the TMA 2004 urged greater communication by local authorities of
their parking policies, guidelines and performances and recommended that this could partly be
achieved through the publication of annual reports.
The Council has the discretion to cancel a PCN at any point in the appeals process and has set out the
following policy with regards to the handling of appeals and to the exercise of that discretion;
• All challenges and representations will be considered and each case will be decided upon its
own individual merits. Any extenuating or mitigating circumstances will be taken into
account.
• The staff who issue PCNs will not handle representations which are made against PCNs.
• Representations will only be dealt with by staff that are trained in the handling of such
representations. Those staff shall be authorised to exercise the Council’s discretion to cancel
PCNs.
• Elected members and unauthorised staff will play no part in deciding the outcome of
challenges or representations.
• Every case will be looked into individually and supporting evidence may be requested before a
decision on the outcome of an appeal can be made.
5
EXECUTIVE Agenda Item: 5 – Annex
10 September 2009 Parking Enforcement Operations – Annual Report 2008/09
The following table provides figures taken from the latest (2006) Annual Report of the National
Parking Adjudication Service (NPAS), Which changed its name on 31st March 2008 to the Traffic
Penalty Tribunal.
The figures are for appeals which were made to the independent adjudicators during the calendar year
2006 in respect of PCNs which had been issued by the 156 local authorities (outside of London) who
conducted decriminalised parking enforcement operations during that year. Their report gives figures
for each individual authority, which enables comparisons to be made between them. It also combines
all of those figures to give a set of national “all councils” statistics.
The full NPAS report also contains details of the performance of the adjudication service itself, a
forward by the chief adjudicator and useful information with regards to common themes which have
arisen in adjudication cases, including details of specific relevant cases. It can be accessed on the
service’s website: www.trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk
The appeal statistics given below cover Penalty Charge Notices issued by the Council’s Civil
Enforcement Officers for both on street and off street within car parks.
Refused by Adjudicator
withdrawn by appellant
Awaiting decision
Appeals Received
Rate of Appeal
Total Allowed
Not Contested
By Council
including
Per PCN
As the above table shows, the Council’s rate of appeal to the independent adjudicators per PCN issued
is considerably lower than the national average.
The Council sees this as a clear indication that PCNs are being properly issued and that appeals made
against those PCNs are being properly dealt with in a thorough, fair and equitable manner and in
accordance with the relevant legal requirements.
6
EXECUTIVE Agenda Item: 5 – Annex
10 September 2009 Parking Enforcement Operations – Annual Report 2008/09
Car Parking Enforcement Income
Reigate & Banstead Borough Council’s Off Street parking enforcement income & expenditure for the
financial year ended 31st March 2009
Income £
Expenditure
Employees 198,562
Uniforms 2,636
Transport 2,826
Supplies & Services 10,044
Deficit 63,924
Summary
The implementation of the Traffic Management Act 2004 on the 31st March 2008 had a big impact on
Parking Services with major changes in signage within the Council’s Car Parks, Staff uniforms, IT
computers systems and correspondence. This major task was completed by the deadline of the 31st
March and Civil Enforcement Officers were on patrol that day.
The Council also completed the £600K refurbishment of both Multi Storey Car Parks in Redhill and
Reigate. The work focused on re-surfacing the car parks to protect the concrete super structure and
prolong the useful life of the car parks, which are a major source of income for the Council.
Parking Services commenced discussions with Cobalt Technologies to introduce the RingGO
Cashless Parking System into all of the Borough’s Car Parks. This service allows customers to pay for
their parking by using a mobile phone and credit or debit card thus avoiding the need for change.
In the coming year the Council is working towards achieving the Park Mark Award formerly called
the Safer Car Parks Award.
In September 2009 the Council’s Civil Enforcement Officers will also have some additional new
powers that will enable then to issue tickets to vehicles parked over pedestrian dropped kerbs and
vehicle crossovers. The Council has also agreed with Surrey County Council (highways Authority) to
implement Regulation 10 Penalty Charge Notices, where a ticket can be served on a motorist who
drives away through the post. An explanation and further information regarding the use of these new
powers can be found on the Council’s website.
7
EXECUTIVE Agenda Item: 5 – Annex
10 September 2009 Parking Enforcement Operations – Annual Report 2008/09
Abbreviations
CEO Civil Enforcement Officer
MSCP Multi Storey Car Park
NTO Notice to Owner
OFR Order For Recovery
PCN Penalty Charge Notice
RTA 1991 Road Traffic Act 1991
TMA 2004 Traffic Management Act 2004
Glossary of terms
Warrants of execution – This is a formal notice following non payment of a debt which is applied
for from the court. This is passed to a bailiff allowing the recovery of the debt.
PCNs registered at the Traffic enforcement centre – The Traffic Penalty Tribunal (TPT) is an
independent tribunal set up to consider parking appeals. Appeals registered with the TPT are
considered by an adjudicator whose decision is final. The decision may be to uphold the appeal and
tell the council to cancel the PCN or to dismiss the appeal, whereby the PCN is upheld.
Charge certificate –The Council is required to send a charge certificate to the owner of a vehicle as
part of the process to recover PCN charges that are not paid.
Contacts
Reigate & Banstead Borough Council
Town Hall
Castlefield Road
Reigate
RH2 0SH
Customer Services 01737-276000
Email: Customer.services@reigate-banstead.gov.uk
Web: www.reigate-banstead.gov.uk