Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Methods
Preparation of Calcium Phosphate Gel-The preparation and properties
of calcium phosphate gels were extensively investigated. Certain perti-
* Supported by a grant from the United States Atomic Energy Commission,Di-
vision of Biology and Medicine, contract No. AT(30-1)lllQ.
379
880 ENZYMES OF HUMAN ERYTHROCYTE. I
PHOSPHORYLAgE
I
0.5
GEL S”SP?4OOE% PEk-“hi!- R.&C.
FIG. 1. Relative enzyme affinities for tricalcium phosphate gel a~ determined in
the crude hemolysate. The gel and hemolysate were thoroughly mixed and centri-
fuged, and the supernatant solution was assayed for residual enzymes. R.B.C. =
red blood cell.
Purafiation Procedure
The purification protocol is presented in summarized form in Table I.
Details concerning the purification procedure as carried out on a 509 ml.
batch of washed erythrocytes follow.
Preparation of HemolysaGutdated human blood obtained from the
hospital blood bank served as the source of red cells. The cells were thor-
oughly washed with 1 per cent sodium chloride solution and adhering
leucocytes were removed. The washed cells were hemolyzed by the addi-
tion of 4 volumes of ion-free water.
Enzyme Adsorption on Calcium Phosphate Gel-To the hemolyzed red
cells was added a volume of gel suspension (see under “Methods” for
preparation of gel suspension) equal to the original volume of cells (500
ml. of gel suspension per 500 ml. of original erythrocytes) . After thorough
mixing, the gel containing adsorbed enzyme was removed and washed
by repeated centrifugation and resuspension with ion-free water until the
washings were free from color. Resuspension of gel was facilitated by
K. K. TSUBOI AND P. B. HUDSON 883
the use of a rubber stirrer driven by a variable speed motor. The rela-
tionship between gel concentration and enzyme adsorption is illustrated
in Fig. 1.
Elution of Enzyme from Gel-The thoroughly washed gel containing
adsorbed enzyme was evenly suspended to 500 ml. volume. To the sus-
pension was added an equal volume of 0.005 M trisodium citrate. After
being mixed, the gel was separated by centrifugation at room temperature.
The resulting eluate was a clear, light pink solution. The use of weaker
TABLE I
Purim Nucleoside Phosphorylase; Purification Protocol
- -
lows: 20 ~1. aliquots of the enzyme solution (0.8 per cent protein) were
transferred onto separate paper strips which had been equilibrated pre-
viously with buffer solution (Verona1 buffer at 0.075 ionic strength and
pH 8.5). The electrophoretic run was carried out in a cold room (at
approximately 6”) for a 16 hour period with a constant current of 5 ma.
Protein patterns were obtained after staining with brom phenol blue.
The stained areas were subsequently analyzed for dye concentration with
a recording densitometer (Spinco, Analytrol).
From the electrophoretic patterns obtained, the preparation appeared
to be homogeneous. A slight amount of material was found to be re-
tained at the origin (presumably denatured protein). The remaining
t,he solution was placed into an appropriate cell and the sedimentation
was carried out at 59,890 r.p.m. in t,he analytical rotor T\‘o. A61 at an aver-
age temperature of 13.5”. Photographs were taken at convenient inter-
vals.
The sedimentation pattern obtained following a 70 minute run is repro-
duced in Fig. 3. A faster moving minor contaminant was found to be
present in the preparation. That the slower moving fraction, rather t.han
the minor component, represented the enzyme was ascertained on the basis
of specific activity measurements on samples carefully withdrawn from
the top and bottom halves of the cell following a 70 minute run. A calcu-
lation of the sedimentation constant of the enzyme, approximated to
DISCUSSIOK
The authors wish to t,hank Dr. Kenneth McCarty for carrying out the
ult.racentrifugal analyses and Dr. Elliot Osserman for the electrophoretic
analyses.
SUMMARY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Keilin, D., and Mann, T., Biochem. J., 34, 1163 (1949).
2. Laskowski, M., and Sumner, J. B., Science, 94, 615 (1941).
3. Adams, E., and Smith, E. L., J. Biol. Chem., 198, 671 (1952).
4. Adams, E., Davis, N. C., and Smith, E. L., J. Biol. Chem., 199, 846 (1952).
5. Zittle, C. A., DellaMonica, E. S., and Custer, J. H., Arch. Biochem. and Biophye.,
Alerts:
• When this article is cited
• When a correction for this article is posted