Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Robert Matthews
H&N Infrastructure
• APPLICABILITY OF SDC
• COMPONENT DESIGN
• ANALYSIS TOOLS
A. Structure depth per Caltrans "Comparative Bridge Costs" or BDS Table 8.9.2
B. Column width ≅ superstructure depth (use next lower standard column size)
C. Check minimum confinement per SDC 8.2.5 and BDS equation 8-62
A. Calculate curvature at yield, φy, and at failure, φu, based on axial dead load in column
D. Magnify displacement demands by amplification factor from ATC-32 Section 3.21.10.1 for
low period structures. Note that use of this factor is not specifically addressed in the SDC.
Refer to Memo to Designers 20-1, page 7 for further information.
1 T* 1
Amplification factor R d = 1 − + ≥ 1
R T R
R = Force reduction factor from preliminary column sizing
T* = Period centered at peak of response spectrum
A. Use equations from SDC 3.1.3 to calculate displacement capacity of single column bents
ii. Use moment hinge in push-over analysis to determine collapse deflection of bents
A. Perform equivalent static analysis (ESA) or response spectra analysis (RSA) of the bridge
structure in the longitudinal and transverse directions
E. Magnify displacement demands by amplification factor from ATC-32 Section 3.21.10.1 for
low period structures.
ii. Use moment hinge in push-over analysis to determine collapse deflection of frame(s)
A. Check shear capacity per SDC 3.6 to exceed overstrength shear demand
B. Check minimum development length into cap beam per SDC 8.2
i. Use nominal material strength with strength reduction factor, φ , for shear
ii. Use expected material strength with no reduction factor for moment
b. Provide minimum transverse column reinforcing into the cap per SDC 7.4.4.2
For skews > 20° , add J - dowels, Asj −bar = 0.08 Ast
Ast
Transverse reinforcement, ρs = 0.4
lac2
C. Design superstructure
ii. Design for vertical acceleration if PGA > 0.5G (SDC 7.2.2)
b. Design girder side reinforcing to resist 1.25G by shear friction and continue
reinforcing 25 feet (7 meters) beyond the face of the bent cap.
ii. Size shear keys for 75% of the lateral pile capacity per SDC 7.8.4
CALTRANS REQUIREMENTS
• MTD 20-1 - The effects of foundation flexibility shall be considered in the seismic design and
analysis of all bridges.
• SDC 2.2.1 - The global displacement demand estimate shall include the effects of soil/foundation
flexibility if they are significant.
1. Competent Soil – “Foundations surrounded by competent soil ... (have) an insignificant impact on
the overall dynamic response of the bridge and is typically ignored in the demand and capacity
assessment. “
2. Poor Soil - The presence of poor soil classifies a bridge as non-standard, thereby requiring project-
specific design criteria that address soil structure interaction (SSI) related phenomena.
3. Marginal Soil - Marginal defines the range on soil that cannot readily be classified as either
competent or poor. The course of action for bridges in marginal soil will be determined on a
project-by-project basis.
CONCERNS
• The displacement demand calculated using a linear elastic bridge model is not compatible with the
displacement capacity calculated using a static nonlinear (pushover) bridge model.
• Caltrans SDC requires that a bridge have a displacement capacity which exceeds the displacement
demand calculated using linear elastic material properties. Empirical studies have shown that the
so-called "equal displacement" rule is appropriate for single degree-of-freedom structures with
initial vibration period, T, greater than the peak of the response spectrum. ATC 32 Section
3.21.10.1 provides amplification factors for displacement demand of lower period structures based
on empirical studies without foundation flexibility.
• The foundation stiffness used in the bridge models may have a significant effect on the response
acceleration and displacement of the structure. The foundation is capacity-protected and does not
deflect beyond the load level corresponding to the plastic hinging of the columns, therefore use of
a linear foundation spring in the demand model does not seem appropriate.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Initial recommendation
A. Geotechnical engineer to classify soil as competent, poor or marginal per SDC 6.2.2
B. Ignore foundation flexibility when designing for structures with pile foundations in
competent soil.
C. Other structures will require studies to determine project-specific criteria based on sensitivity
of structure design to foundation flexibility.
A. Response acceleration
B. Deflection demand
C. Deflection capacity
MOMENT-CURVATURE ANALYSIS
• Moment-curvature determined from iterative section analysis using nonlinear stress-strain material
properties of concrete and reinforcing steel
• Curvature, φ = ε/c, in radians / (length unit) determined from section strain distribution
σ ε
c
STRESS STRAIN
• Cracked moment of inertia, Icr, determined from curvature at first yield of reinforcing
M
I =
cr Eφ
• Plastic moment, Mpl, determined from average moment after first yield
MOMENT-CURVATURE
12000
ELASTIC-PLASTIC TRANSITION
POINT
10000
PLASTIC MOMENT
8000
MOMENT (k-ft)
6000
4000
2000
0
0 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0004 0.0005 0.0006 0.0007 0.0008 0.0009
CURVATURE (rad/in)
• Computer tools include XSECTION (Caltrans), CONSEC (H&N), UCFyber (ZEVENT) and
SEQMC (SEQAD)
• Computer tools include, wFRAME (Caltrans), SAP2000 Nonlinear and SC-PUSH3D (SC
Solutions)
• Incremental static analysis may also be used with conventional hand calculations or programs by
inserting moment hinges as each joint goes plastic.
• wFRAME and incremental static analysis require additional hand calculations to determine
collapse deflection beyond formation of final hinge