Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
com
ISSN: 0976-8688
CODEN (USA): PSHIBD
ABSTRACT
The objective of the present study was to entrap isoniazid, an Antitubercular drug, in cross
linked chitosan matrix and study in vitro lung deposition of powdered chitosan microspheres
using Andersen cascade impactor. Ionic cross linker Tripolyphospate was used to make cross
linked chitosan microspheres to achieve sustained drug release. Chitosan microspheres were
prepared by spray drying method. The spray dried microspheres were characterized for size,
shape, drug release and in vitro pulmonary drug deposition. Aerosol properties like fine particle
fraction and Mass median aerodynamic diameter were also evaluated. The cross linked
microsphere were prepared with entrapment efficiency of 72 to 88 percentages. Spray dried
microspheres had mean particle size of 3.6 to 5.2 µm and fine particle fraction of 67 %.
Key words: Dry powder inhaler, Isoniazid, Chitosan, tripolyphosphate, dispersing agent.
INTRODUCTION
Microparticles and nanoparticles have been explored as drug delivery carrier to administration of
drug agents used in pulmonary disorders. Microencapsulation offers the advantage of protection
of drug against pulmonary metabolism, sustained and prolong drug release. Dry powder inhalers
have edge over the existing liquid inhaler systems like MDIs, Nebulizer, and Aerosol Sprays etc.
DPI offer better patient compliance as well as overcomes the instability. Controlled release
dosage forms provide advantage over immediate release dosage form: reduction in side effects,
first pass metabolism, maintenance of effective plasma concentration and reduced dosing
frequency [1]. There are many advantages to develop sustained release formulations for
pulmonary delivery of drugs for localized treatment of diseases like asthma, chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease and infectious diseases. Sustained release of drug helps in reducing the
frequency and dose size as well as improves the plasma drug level [2].
88
Pelagia Research Library
Aliasgar J. Kundawala et al Der Pharmacia Sinica, 2011, 2(5):88-97
Isoniazid was selected as a model drug for dry powder formulations in treatment of tuberculosis.
INH is less permeated through the stomach and is mainly absorbed through the intestine because
it occurs in the protonated form at acidic pH (pKa = 2) [3]. Therefore, it can be considered as a
good candidate for the development of a site-specific release formulation especially in case of
Tuberculosis to deliver it in lung. Chitosan [Poly (1,4)-b-D-glucopyranosamine], a
polysaccharide produced from crab or shrimp shells, which is a copolymer combined of
glucosamine and an N-acetyl glucosamine unit [4]. It is a bioadhesive, biocompatible and
biodegradable polymer obtained through deacetylation of naturally occurring chitin [5]. The
release modifying and mucoadhesive property of chitosan appears to be a good choice for
preparing sustained release formulation for lung delivery via inhalation. Very handful work has
been done in this directions.[6-9]. A stabilized chitosan based controlled drug delivery system
have been prepared with either chemical cross liking agents such as glutaraldehyde, ascorbic
acid, sodium phosphate and sodium tripolyphosphates, pentapolyphosphates etc.[10 18]. Recent
applications of chitosan are in ophthalmic, nasal, sublingual, buccal, periodontal, gastrointestinal,
colon-specific, vaginal, transdermal drug delivery and as mucosalvaccine and gene carrier
[19].The undesirable side effects like mucosal membrane irritation can be overcome by
ionotropic gelation using multivalent anions. Chitosan microspheres/microparticles can be
prepared by number of techniques such as solvent evaporation, emulsification/ internal gelation,
coacervation, suspension cross linking and spray drying [20-21].
The spray drying technique is advantageous in many ways to prepare microparticles for
pharmaceutical application as it is reproducible, one step, rapid and easy to scale up [20, 22].
Spray drying technique can be used to produce dry powders, granules or agglomerates from
drug-excipient solutions and suspensions [23]. The particle size of the microparticles prepared by
spray drying technique ranged from microns to several tens of microns and had a relatively
narrow size distribution. Recently, spray-drying has been developed to be used as a continuous
process for producing microspheres, especially for the preparation of microspheres for
pharmaceutical applications.
Thus the aim of the present research was to prepare, chitosan microspheres containing Isoniazid
by a spray drying method. The effects of concentration of tripolyphosphate on microsphere
properties were studied.
Isoniazid was obtained as a gift sample from Strides Acrolab, Bangaluru (Inida), chitosan was
generously provided by Central institute of fisheries technology, Cochin, India.
Tripolyphosphate was obtained from S D fine Chemicals, Baroda. L Leucine was purchased
from Renkem, India. α, mono lactose was obtained from Meggle, Wasserburg Gmbh and Co.,
Germany as a gift sample. All Other chemicals and solvents used were of analytical grade.
Where WC and WN are weight percentage of carbon and nitrogen in chitosan respectively.
89
Aliasgar J. Kundawala et al Der Pharmacia Sinica, 2011, 2(5):88-97
Entrapment efficiency was determined by extracting (10mg Equivalent drug ) in 7.4 phosphate
buffer. The suspension was centrifugation at 10000rpm for 5 min and supernant collected was
filtered through (0.2µm nylon filters, Whatman, UK). The filtrate was assayed for drug content
by UV spectroscopy (Shimadzu 1700, Japan) at the wavelength of 264 nm.
The percentage encapsulation efficiency for each drug was calculated by the formula
Encapsulation efficiency = [Total amount of drug – free drug/ total amount of drug] x 100
90
Aliasgar J. Kundawala et al Der Pharmacia Sinica, 2011, 2(5):88-97
Where Wt is weight of the microspheres at time t and W0 is initial weight of the microspheres.
91
Aliasgar J. Kundawala et al Der Pharmacia Sinica, 2011, 2(5):88-97
The powder characteristics of the five different formulations of chitosan microspheres are shown
in table 1. In the process of spray drying the chitosan-TPP- Drug suspension was sprayed in the
chamber, circulated with hot air, and collected as dry powder which was collected in cyclone
separator. Here, TPP interacted with chitosan before formation of particles on spray drying.
The % yield was in the range of 28.31 to 32.62 %. SEM micrographs revealed that most of the
spray dried microspheres were spherical in shape. No significant difference was observed when
different concentration of cross linking agent was employed. The size of microspheres was found
in the range of 3.6 to 5.2 µm. The particle size decreased slightly on increase in TPP
concentration from 0.3 to 1.5 % w/v. However, as the cross linking extent was increased the
encapsulation efficiency was found to be decreased from 87.5 to 72.1 %. In contrast the drug
loading was found to be more than 45 percentile in each formulation. The uniform size of the
chitosan-TPP cross linked microspheres was due to the entrapment of TPP in the microsphere
core [27].
92
Aliasgar J. Kundawala et al Der Pharmacia Sinica, 2011, 2(5):88-97
Figure 1: Scanning electron microscope pictures of non cross linked (a), non-cross-linked drug loaded (b) and
cross linked drug loaded (c) chitosan microspheres.
The study revealed that the SEM micrographs of non cross linked chitosan microspheres have
smooth surface compared to cross linked chitosan microspheres. The SEM micrograph also
indicates the aggregation of chitosan microspheres due to existing weak interparticle bonding.
Under the present spray drying conditions, chitosan TPP microspheres did not show any
characteristic peaks, although peaks with reduced intensity were seen. Where as the
characteristic us nature of peaks were absent in the spray dried formulations indicating the
amorphous nature and entrapment and complexation with polymer. Encapsulation of drug
showed unidentified, broad and diffused peaks with very low intensities. This is indicative of
amorphous nature of drug.
93
Aliasgar J. Kundawala et al Der Pharmacia Sinica, 2011, 2(5):88-97
FIGURE 2: X-ray diffractograms of pure drug Isoniazid [X-1], uncrosslinked drug loaded chitosan
microspheres [X-2] and cross linked drug loaded chitosan microspheres [X-3].
400
350
300
0.6 % TPP
200
0.9 % TPP
50
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
time point
94
Aliasgar J. Kundawala et al Der Pharmacia Sinica, 2011, 2(5):88-97
crosslinked chitosan microspheres was increased with time. However at the higher concentration
of TPP the capacity of chitosan microsphere decreases. It may be the result of tightly packing of
matrix in presence of TPP. The present study confirms the rigid chitosan –TPP network.
120
0.3 % TPP
100
cumulative % drug release
0.6 % TPP
80
0.9 % TPP
60
1.2 % TPP
40
1.5 % TPP
20
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
Tim e (in hrs)
Figure 4: in vitro drug release profile of chitosan microspheres loaded with isoniazid
The water solubility and faster swelling of spray dried chitosan microspheres was responsible for
burst drug release. The faster swelling as well as low diffusion path due to small particle size
resulted in faster drug release from the chitosan-TPP microspheres. The higher drug loading in
microspheres also contributed towards the initial burst release. It was found that addition of TPP
into chitosan microspheres influenced the retardation of drug from the chitosan matrix. Increase
in TPP concentration from 0.3 to 1.5 % w/v decreases the release of isoniazid from the chitosan
microspheres. The high crosslinking density and rigid structure due to cross linking with TPP
might have resulted in less swelling ability. The sustained isoniazid release was seen after two
hours which followed zero order release pattern, more than 90 % of isoniazid released in 8 hours.
95
Aliasgar J. Kundawala et al Der Pharmacia Sinica, 2011, 2(5):88-97
indication of good dispersibility of prepared powder. 88.34 ± 2.16 % and 89.86 ± 1.95 % of drug
was found to be emitted. However, the role of leucine is not discussed in detail in this research
work.
Table 2: Summary of aerosol deposition data of spray dried chitosan microsphere formulations (n=3).
The hydrophobic and surfactant like properties of Leucine might have influence the surface
characteristics of dry powder formed in spray dying resulting in a good dispersibility of dry
powder. FPF of drug loaded chitosan-TPP microsphere was found to be 68.8 ± 2.7 and for
noncrosslinked chitosan microspheres was 63.2 ± 3.2 indicative of no significant difference. The
FPF obtained in this range are considered to be satisfactory [28-30]. A MMADae of less than
5µm is prerequisite to have an inhalation of powders into the lower region of the lung. The SEM
micrograph suggested agglomeration of particles but obtained MMADae values indicative of
particles behaving as individual particles on aspiration. This may be due to the week cohesive
forces between the particles and the higher drag force applied.
CONCLUSION
The recent studies on spray dried chitosan microspheres demonstrated possibility of generating
highly respirable powders that exhibits good aerosolization properties. Effective
microencapsulation and loading of Isoniazid with controlled size was feasible with spray drying
technique. It is possible to produce good spherical particles with size less than 10 µm with spray
drying technique. The applied processing conditions resulted in drug loaded chitosan-TPP
micropsheres having good surface properties and spherical shape suitable for inhalation.
Sustained drug release was achieved with addition of tripolyphosphate TPP as a crosslinking
agent. The chitosan microspheres loaded with Isoniazid was found to possess effective fine
particle fraction as well as lower impaction loss and device retention for effective aerosolization.
These spray dried microspheres would be predicted to deposit predominately in the central and
peripheral regions of the lung following inhalation. Chitosan, natural polysaccharide with
biodegradable properties can be used as a carrier for inhalation delivery.
REFERENCES
[1] B.K. Kim, SJ Hwang, JB Park HJ. Park, J. of Microencapsul., 2002, 19, 811.
[2] J. G Hardy., T S Chadwick, Clin. Pharmacokinet., 2000, 39, 1–4.
[3] W Mehnert, K Mader, Adv. Drug Del. Rev, 2001, 47, 165-196
[4] R Bodmeier, K H Oh, Y Pramar, Drug Dev Ind Pharm., 1989, 15, 1475–1494.
[5] J. Broadhead, S. K. Rouan, T. Rhodes, Drug Dev Ind Pharm., 1992, 18, 1169–1206.
[6] Y.C. Huang, M K. Yeh, S.N. Cheng, C.H. Chiang, J. Microencapsul., 2003, 20, 459–472.
[7] M. Asada, H. Takahashi, H. Okamoto, H. Tanino, K. Danjo, Int. J. Pharm., 2004 270, 167–
174.
[8] A. Grenha, B. Seijo, C. Remunan-Lopez, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 2005, 25, 427–437.
[9] T. P. Learoyd, J. L. Burrows, E. French, P. Seville, Eur. J. of Pharm. and Biopharm. 2007,
68(2):224-34.
[10] OAC. Jr Monteiro, C. Airobli, Int. J. Biol. Macromol, 1999, 26, 119–128.
[11] K.C. Gupta, F.H. Jabrail. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341,744–756.
[12] V.R. Patel, M.M. Amiji,. Pharmaceut. Res. 1996, 13, 588–593.
96
Aliasgar J. Kundawala et al Der Pharmacia Sinica, 2011, 2(5):88-97
[13] L.G. Martini, M. Coles, K. Gravell, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 2000, 26, 79–83.
[14] M.L. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, M.A. Holgado, C. Sanchez-Lafuente, A.M. Rabasco, A. Fini,
Int. J. Pharm., 2002, 232, 225–234.
[15] X.Z. Shu, K.J. Zhu, Int. J. Pharm., 2002, 233, 217–225.
[16] K.C. Gupta, F.H. Jabrail,, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2006, 38, 272–283.
[17] E. Esposito, R. Cortesi, C. Mastnenizzi, Biomaterials,1996 , 17, 2004–2020.
[18] S. Tittaya, O. Praneet, R. Theerasak, N. Tanasait, Tropical J. of Pharm. Res., 2011, 10, (3),
317-324
[19] S Kalyan, P Sharma, V Garg, N Kumar, J Varshney. Der Pharmacia Sinica, 2010, 1,195-
210
[20] V.R. Sinha, A.K. Singla, S. Wadhawan, R. Kaushik, R. Kumria, K. Bansal, S. Dhawan, Int J
Pharm, 2004,274, 1–33.
[21] Y.C. Huang, C.H. Chiang and M.K. Yeh, J. Microencapsul, 2003, 20(2), 247-260.
[22] P. He, SS Davis, L Illum, Int. J. Pharm, 1999,187, 53–65.
[23] F.J. Wang, C.H. Wang, J. Microencapsul, 2002,19,495–510.
[24] A. Misra, P. Muttil, J. Kaur, K. Kumar, A. B. Yadav, R Sharma, Eur. J. of Pharm. Sci.,
2007, 32, 140–150.
[25] K. C. Gupta, F. H. Jabrail, Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008, 19, 432–441
[26] R. Hejazi, M.Amiji, J Control Rel, 2003, 89,151–165.
[27] A. K. Anal, W. F. Stevens, C. Remuan-Lopez., Int. J. Pharm 2006,312,166–173.
[28] H. Larhrib., X.M. Zeng, G. P. Martin, C. Marriott, J. Pritchard, Int. J. Pharm. 1999, 191.
[29] X. M. Zeng, G. P. Martin, S. K. Tee, A. A. Ghoush, C Marriott, Int. J. Pharm.1999,182,
133–144.
[30] D.O. Corrigan., O.I. Corrigan., A.M. Healy., Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 322, 22–30.
97