0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
1K Ansichten2 Seiten
The Legislative Services Agency determined that Amendment 1, if ratified, would require the new education commission to adopt course standards in place of common core.
Originaltitel
Legislative analyst letter to Del Marsh on Common Core language in Amendment 1
The Legislative Services Agency determined that Amendment 1, if ratified, would require the new education commission to adopt course standards in place of common core.
The Legislative Services Agency determined that Amendment 1, if ratified, would require the new education commission to adopt course standards in place of common core.
11 South Union St Suite 722 Montgomery, Alabama 36130
Course of Study Standards Contemplated by Act 2019-345:
#LSA2019-2822.
Dear President Pro Tempore Marsh:
Act 2019-345, proposes an amendment to the Constitution
of Alabama of 1901, to change the name of the State Board of Education and the State Superintendent of Education to the Alabama Commission on Elementary and Secondary Education and the Secretary of Elementary and Secondary Education, respectively, and to change the composition and selection of members of the commission and the selection of the secretary. Paragraph 5 of the amendatory language requires the newly formed commission to adopt specific standards, programs, and systems beyond that required by general law. The first requirement is that the commission adopt:
“a. Course of study standards that ensure nationwide
consistency and the seamless transfer of students from within and outside of the state, in lieu of common core.”
“The first rule in statutory construction is to
determine whether the language at issue has a plain and unambiguous meaning with regard to the particular dispute. If the statute's meaning is plain and unambiguous, there is no need for further inquiry.” United States v. Silva, 443 F.3d 795, 797–98 (11th Cir.2006) (internal quotes omitted). The classic test is that "the meaning of the statute must, in the first instance, be sought in the language in which it is framed, and if that is plain, the sole function of the courts is to enforce it according to its terms." Caminetti v. U.S., 242 U.S. 470 (1917); Southerland Statutory Construction, Section 46.01. We note that the State Board of Education has adopted and is currently implementing common core standards in the public schools; it is completely logical to conclude that 203311-1 Page 2
those are the common core standards that the newly formed commission is tasked with replacing.
In this case, the relevant language in Act 2019-345,
clearly and unambiguously states that the Alabama Commission on Elementary and Secondary Education shall adopt "[c]ourse of study standards... in lieu of common core.” The Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary defines “in lieu of” as “in the place of: instead of” and Black’s Law Dictionary defines “in lieu of” as a phrase that means “instead of or in place of; in exchange or return for.” Therefore, the commission is charged with adopting course of study standards to use in the public schools of Alabama instead of, or in place of, common core standards.
Based on the forgoing, the constitutional amendment
proposed to Amendment 284 to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, by Act 2019-345, if ratified, mandates that the commission adopt course of study standards that are not common core standards.
If we may provide any further assistance in this matter,