Sie sind auf Seite 1von 67
CHAPTER 5 EXPLORATION, SAMPLING, AND IN SITU SOIL MEASUREMENTS 341 DATA REQUIRED estzation of the underground conditions at a site is preequiste 10 th : alko neceseiy to cbt xploraton, which usally range fom about 051 onstruction costs, oaly fo find aller constuction has start ‘he practice not recommend ‘oa ofthe adjacent structures is an indicaon, but certainly no gurantee, ha bese is satisfactory. With the considerable urban renewal contol the underground condo meters in any diretion. 12 The elements of «se investigation depend heavily om the project but Information to determine the spe of foundation required (shallow or dee Information to allow the geotechnical consultant to make a recommenda onthe allowable load capacity ofthe foundation. ficient datalaboratory texts to make setlement prediction Location of the groundwater table (or determination of whether ti in the 5 Information 20 tha the identsention and solution of canstrvetion problems (Shooting and dewatering or rock excavation) can be mide 6 Idenieation of potential problems (stlements, exiting damage, et) concer ing adjacent property. Identifeation of environmental problems and tei sottion adions are contemplated. The current sity ofan exiting trace nay eq remedial measures may be undertaken based on new found information or the 1 part ofthe exlontion rogram may lnciode onsite monitoring, both followed. Where the excavation reveal conditions requiing Jegn changes cost to 8 minimum. Pesconsrucion monitoring ol buildin perfomance pees co te I review of the design procedures and builds a data base for feture work to ob Unfortunatly, few owners are wing to make tis investment or even allow Bop je Property entry should the foundation console be wiling fo wader the cot While the primary focus of his ehaper son sit exploration for biking iss and othe stevtures where te cost per unt of ara is high compact site) many of {he methods are applicable o roads, scelds, and water, sewer, pipe and power lines and otber extended sites Extended ite exploration i stl fo estab line si ‘nd grade, lone groundwater lee nd rek in, eine zones of poor-quality as stare fol and establish borrow pi a ‘eer ‘asian Ea sor qeetg) 32 MerHODs OF EXPLORATION et Tae condition ‘The most widely wed method of subsurface investigation for compact ites and ie, thatthe most extended sts is boring holes ito the ground from which samples may be eas and. vith callected for eter visual inspection or laborstory testing, Several procedures are vo quality ‘ommonly used to dil dhe hols and to obtain the sol samples, These wl be taken ion within a fe ‘pin more deal aer, (Generally we may categorize the sie exploration atin Table 31 where (ot prior st knowledge) decision i m exploration methods for sample recovery} Dee ‘roy ‘est-—or in the usual case use w combination, “Table 32 lists the wie variety 1960 this ist would only have included ‘mechanical cone (CPT) tite and the vane lee sun or ensued snp ecole te ai optinnay berg de whether oat doa st Sagat latino at ee ono ce “me” mn er hse ty of in situ tests currently available. Prior 1) q the sanded pension (SPT aap Siar an pt ad ets Most otal 82 Schr hehe ee cope nie pat sean ee a thes ch te sca oes ean moves os te eagalf_ oc cee ae only se lp parameters) ‘mechanical cone, Many ofthe tet meth "ymbee of users and some listed ar litle beyond the deveopenent sane, however, since needs are often sen aad requiring an almost instant solution. From this lit one has several choc any of the desired engiesring. dg ‘A summary rach a hiss well, ‘making an in sit determination of The more widely wed in sit tet methods given in Table 3.2, in some deta. Fo information on those ess wily ed andr sll sooty leylopmen, the reader i refered tothe ce reference (which sontang oa serene ls). Abo of interest would be the ASCE Geatahnal Set Prblcation No 6: Use ofn Situ Tests n Geotechnical Engnerns ni’ wl be desig 33. PLANNING THE EXPLORATION PROGRAM The prpos of te exploration program ito deteming, within practical imi ‘ratiletion and engincering properties of the sols undeifing the a Principal properties of interest wll be the strength, deormatin’ a tard ‘harass. The program should be planned so tht the musanons wenn ‘information can be abtsned at minimum ost Ti may be more economic to provid a conservative building design than) expend large sums on an elaborate exploration and tesing poties OF mea hand, sufient exploration should be undertaken 56 that the foviony Consultant isnot ia the postion of making an expensive recommen Drotee aginst uncertainties which could have been eteaed ye nen rogram It should be understood ta a recommendation made sy top the consultant when an adequate exploration has been underlay ohesolishighly erat thee should on seneral picture ofthe underground condition be conservatively Based on of etic ie iavoled if an Ta planning the program the foundation consultant must have god knox edge of current and acepted methods ofboth field exploration af Keeney testing and thee lmitations. A competent conslnt wil aie feo ay understanding of equipment faction and soll behavior to make sajtrene {hat nonstandard equipment or ‘est methods can be wed imietarh nea esd information iy besuficient boring to exabish 8. An exteasve boring (and lab Bropetes ofthe poorer soll. Again « quest ncesve number of borings are taken unde thy 1 planning the progr um full advantage should be taken of any exstig information inching the ge otechnical consultants’ own data bas [or heat is obviously most help io have doe st exploration on adjust sad ‘nthe general are. It will also be most advantageous to have mene eon at ings if this is apart of the detailed ste exploration follower then ee feasibility study. Even if the consultant doesnot have «data be eye a considerable underground information may exit pariclasy menan ‘arious publi ad uy ofc, the owner es, oF the flee theceeeer neha tet who has reiained the geotechnical constant In any cas the eggs ald be med for a corration and extension ofthe exiting data bee ell eae To tan undeveloped area where no data base curently shine the program iin fact exploratory ‘The more widely used i stu est methods given in Table 32 willbe descr in some detail. For information on thos lee widely used andor al somewhat g evelopment, the reader i referred 1 the cited reference (which contains lp reference lst) Albo of interest would be the ASCE Geotechaical, Space Publication No, 6: Use of in Siu Tests in Geotechnical Engineering (1986). 33. PLANNING THE EXPLORATION PROGRAM ‘The purpose ofthe exploration program isto determine, within practical iit th stratification and engineering properties of the soll underlying the site Tap racial properties of interest wil be the strength, deformation, and hyde ‘haracentis. The program shouldbe planned so that the maximum amount of Information can be obtained a minimum cox. may be more economical to provide a conservative building design than expend large sums onan elaborate exploration and testing program. On the othe hand, suficient exploration should) be undertaken so thatthe foundation consultant is not inthe postion of making an expensive recommendation ta protect against uncertainties which could have been detected by a resonabl rogram. It shouldbe understood that a recommendation mede simply to prot "he consultant when an adequate exploration has boea undertaken isnot eh thesolishighly enats, thee should only be suit borings to eablisha ener picture of the underground conditions. An extensive boring and labo ‘tory testing) program is at justified in eta ois ad the final desig should be conservatively based of the properties of the poorer sols. Again question of ethics involved If an excesive number of borings are taken under these Tn planning the program the foundation consultant must have a good knowl ‘ge of eurent and accepted methods ofboth fed exploration and laboratory ‘esting and their limitations. A competent consultant wll also have sole Understanding of equipment function and sol behavior to make adjustment 30 ‘hat nonstandard equipment or est methods can be sedi necesry, to obtain the desired information Tn planning the program full advantage should be taken of eny existog ‘information, incding the geotechnical consultants’ own data base or the are. is obviously most helpful to have done sit exploration on adjacent sites ora lea inthe genera ars. I wll also be most advantageous to have made the inal bor ings if this i a part of the detailed ste exploration follow-up from an care feasibility study. Even if he consultant does not havea data base to work fom considerable underground information may exit—partculary in urban eat various public and uly oes, the owner les, othe fils o the engineer arch tect who has retained the geotechnal consulta. In any case the borings boul be used fora correlation ad extension ofthe exiting database ial pone Th fan undeveloped area where no data base curently exists the program bin fact vi be dec Fil somewhat Prcortins aig pectnical§ Bi (980) pst i fa the se Ty fo acd bya [Binur amouatal fg desien thang ‘im On the ot Fe foundation (iy reason ‘simply t prota Hes snot eta fis estaba ‘eg and lan fal doen shoud hain quero Aes ‘under thaw ea good know {and isborta have sulin todjuments to obtain tl (ot any existing feforihe are. fete inital bo to work frome ibn areas einer archi ores shoul Ball posible a ‘eam i in fat ‘The actual planning ofa subsurface exploration program inchs some ll ofthe following steps 1, Assembly of all eailable information on dimensions, columa spacing. type and tse of the structure, basement requirements, and any spect architectural considerations ofthe proposed building Foundation regulations inthe loc building code sould be consulted for any special requirements For ries the soil engineer should have acess (0 ‘ype and span lengths as well a pie Toadings. This information wl indicate any settlement limitation, and can be ised fo estimate foundation loads Recomalsane ofthe area. This may be in the form of fel tip tothe sit ‘nhich ean reveal information on the type and behavior of adjacent structures uch as cracks, noticeable age, and possibly sticking doors and windows, The ype of local existing strctore may infuence, to a considerable extent, the exploration program and the best foundation type for the proposed adjacent frvture Since nearby exiting strutores must be talntaned in an "asi Condition, excavations or construction vibrations will have to be catflly Controle. Ersion in exiting cuts (or ditches) may ako be observed, but this information may be of ited use in the foundation analysis of buildings, For ighways however, runof potters aswell ar oil steticaton tothe depth of the erosion or eu, may be observed, Rosk outcrops may give an indication of the presence or the depth of Bedrock "The connaissance may also be i the form of study of the various soures of information avaible, some of which ae Geological! maps. Either US. goverament or state geological survey maps Agronomy maps. Published by the Department of Agriculture (state of Aerial photographs. May require special traning oiterre sol dat, but terrain fates are easly rocognized by the nonspeciaist Waterwel logs (and ol well Hydrological dave, Data costed by the US. Corps of Engineers on streamflow data, ie elevations, and lod levels Slate deparments of transportation soll mamas. Stare wiversty publications. These are usually engineering experiment station publications. Inlormation can be obtained fom the sate university iit {snot known whether a state study hasbeen undertaken and published A preliminary site imsestigation. I this phase afew borings are made or ates pit ‘s opened to establish in a general manner the satiation type of solo be expected, nd possibly the location of the groundwater table, One ot more borings should he taken fo rock, of competet strata ifthe inal borings Indicate the upper soll is loose or highly compressible. This amount of ‘exploration is wualy the extent ofthe sit investigation for small structures A 34. SOIL BORING Hand Tools feasibility exploration program should include enough site data and samp fecover) to approximately establish the foundation design and ident) the ‘Consrutton procedures, Construction procedures (sheeting racing, back Slurry well fock excavation, dewatering ete) can represeat a very sigiea part of the foundation cost and thould be ideatied as carly as practical Tt s-common at this stage fo limit the number of good quality samp recovered and ly heavily on strength and sllement correlations vsing inde propertis such as iuid limit lastety index, and penetration test die Together with unconfined compression tex on samples recovered during pestration testing 4. A detailed site tncstigation, Where the preliminary site investigation hag “stashed the easly of the project, more detailed exploration programs ‘ndertaken. The preliminary borings and data are used usa bass fr locating {diol borings, which should be confirmatory in nature, and determining the addtional samples required It sould be noted that if the si is elaine uniform in statfeation, a ater onde spacing of borings at locations close ‘real superstructure cements should be made. Oa occasion additional borings wil be required to delineate zones of poor soi, rock outeops ls, and othe {reas which can influence the design and onstrction ofthe foundation Sufient addtional sl samples shouldbe recovered to refine the desig) and for any construction procedure required bythe contractor {0 install the {oundation. Ths should avoid an excessive (uncertainty factor) bid for the from unanticipated sol conditions discovered when the excavation b opened exploratory holes into the oil may be made by hand tool, but more commoaly mounted power tools are used “The calest method of obtaining atest hole was to excavate ast pt using a pik and shovel. Beenuse of economies, the cuent procedure i 10 use power ‘rcavaion equipment such asa backhoe to excavate the pit and then to use hand tools o remove a block sample or shape the site for in stu testing. This the best method at present for obtaining quality undisturbed samples or samples for testing "other then vertical orientation. For small jobs, where the sample disturbance hot etic hand or powered auger (Fig. 3-1) held by one or two persons can Be ted Handaugered hols canbe dil to depths of about 38™m, although depth treater than about 8 to 10m ae usually no practical. Commonly the depths ean {o $m as on roadway, airport or smallstructure investigations 0 eran ep ie, b IMoented Power Drills ‘oe umerous borings to greater depths and to collect samples that are tndlsurbed, tbe oaly practical method ist use power-dven equipment. Wash roving sa er used to deseibe one ofthe more commoa methods of advancing 2 holla the ground. A hol started by diving eosng (Fg 32) 10 depth of 315 m. Casings spy pipe which uppors the ol, preventing i om avi The casings cleaned out by means af a chopping bi astened to the lower end of the del od. Water is pumped through the drill rod and exists at high veloc tivough holes i the bie Te water rss between the casing and dil rd, carrying upended soil particle, and overflows at the top of the easing through a T Connection into a contane, rom which the effluent is recigolated back through ne dil od. Te hole is advaneed by rang, rotating, and dropping the bi into he sol atthe bottom ofthe le Dil rods und if necessary casing, are added a he depth ofthe boring increases. Usually 6m or les of easing i required at hole site, This method is quite api fr advancing oles all but the very hard si Strata. Wash borings widely wsedin South Ameria, Altca and Asi, but ery ile in Noxth Americ 8 present Rotory driling another method of advancing tet holes, Tht method uses rotation ofthe dil bt with the simultaneous application of pressure to advance thehole Rotary dings the mor apd method of advancing hoes in rock unless its bealy fissured: however ican also be used fr any ater typeof oi Driling tnd may beusedin sols where theses ofthe oe tend a cave ia. The ding mod ‘usualy a water solution of thixtropiccley euch as bentonite’) with or without tthe admires, whic freed into the sides ofthe hole by the rotating dil is provides sufblet sength in coajusaton with the hydronic presute of the mud suspension (p= lt 12 glem?) apna the solo that it maintains the ok The mul presture also tens to eal of the water fw into the ole rom any perme ble water bearing strata, Variour dil heads are avalabl, uch as auger heads for shallow highway end borrow-pit exploration, ending hess for sol and rock, and oring bis for taking coer Irom rock, as well as fom concrete and asphalt pavement Coninvovsfight augers witha rotary dail are probably the most popular method of soil exploration a present (ig 33) in North America and Europe. The igh act esa stew conveyor t bring the soll fo the surface. The method is fpotcale inal soil elthough in saturated sand under several et of hydrostatic pressure the send tends flow ata the ed etons othe auger, requiring wash ‘own prior osatpling- Borings up o neatly 100 man be made wit these devices, leyening on the driving equipment, soil and auger siz. The augers may be SHoestem ot sol, withthe holow sem ype generally peeered as penetraion tesing o ube sampling maybe done through the stem. Borings do not have to be (ood aig contituou-fight supers for obvious reasons, and this isa decided economic advantage over other boring methods. Comtinuous-fght augers are e Bs ronson aur 0 Mose MES 123 Inspection ofthis st of auger diameters indicates that a wide range of tube sample diameters may be uted. Tube samples aze genealy limited to about 00 mm diameter however, to obian the best lance betwee sample quality and the cot of dling the bok “The actual hole diameter wil be on the onde of 12m larger than the auger sive. In practive a cfting bead isataced 1 a auger fight, and wih or without a head plus depending on the si andthe Roles advanced, At the desired dept the plug removed (uscd) and a penetration test performed andor a tube sample covered. IF pg not used, sol cuttings that have accumulated a he bottom have to be removed eo tha the text can te made ora sample recovered. Caution ‘Should be exeresedin removing the plug Below the water able since a diference in Ivater level inside and outside the auger stem may create a temporary quick ‘Sond in the bos sol unl the water evel stabilizes, Auge igh are added required andthe hol s advanced to a depth domed adequate for he purpose of the exploration, Pereusson dling is til another method of forming a hole. En this method the dil sited, rotated ight, and dropped ont the bottom ofthe ole. Waters ‘related to bring the soil euttings to the pround surtace; casing i required as wel ‘6 pup to cculate the water ING The most important engineering properties required for foundation design are strength, compresbily,and permeability, Reasonably good estimates ofthese EEmpes which ean be obtained with moderate dificult is nearly impossible 0 fbiain a truly undisturbed sample of sil so im general wage the tm idigcurbed" means a sample where some precautions have been taken 10 minimize diturbance or remolding ert In this context, the quality of an undaturbed™ sample vaner widely between soi laboratories. The following represent some ofthe fctors that make an undisturbed sample ard to obtain: 1. Sample aay nlaaded ofthe in stu confining pressures, with Some unknown resting expansion, Lateral expansion oceurs int the sides ofthe borehole so that in situ teste Using the hole diameter ax 4 relerence are “disturbed” an tusknown amount. This the reason K fl tess are so dieu. 2. Samples collected from otber than tests pit are disturbed by volume displace tment ofthe tobe, or other collection device which has some ite volume to fase grain placement when pushed or driven into the soi. The presence of fravel greatly aggravates sample diurbance, 3. Sample rion on the sider of the collection device tends to compress the Sample during weovery. Most simple tubes are or shouldbe) swaged so that the ettng ede fs slighy smaller than the inside tube diameter to rede the side ftion 124 roxxosni ana BeRON 44 Unknown changes in water content depending on recovery method presence or absence of water in ground or borehole 5. Los ofhydrostatc pressure may cause gat bubble void to form inthe sa 6 Handling and transporting sample fom the site 10 the Inborstory tranaering the sample fom sampler to testing mache 1. Quality and atitde of dling crew, laboratory technicians, and the supe cgineee, |& Wosking environment. On very hot or oold days samples may dehydrate freeze if mot protected on ste Worker attitudes may deteriorate i tempera tis close 1o impossibe to obtain “undisturbed” samples of cohesinles mata for strength testing. Sometimes samples of reasonable quahy can be obtina sing thiaoralled piston samplers in medium. to fine-grained sands. In granl material, and in all dense material, samples with minimal disturbance ai ‘obiained only with extteme difcuty. Dilation oovure in dense sands at g ‘combination of volume displacement of the sampler nd any pice of gavel wig fateh onthe cutting edge to give i larger apparent volume, Some stems a ‘ben made to recover cohesioness materials by Irezing the soi, rezing © 2p around the sample (but aot the sample) or injecting aspbalt which isla dissed from the simple, but most commonly thin-walled piston sampler ‘ed fo obtan “undisturbed” samples A survey of frcaing methods and a analysis ofa recent atemp ie given y Singh eta (1983. ‘test pit may be used to recover a quality sample bu the large amount of hand work wll make tifcul to justify the expense The devices shown in Figo can te used to recover disturbed samples from a boring for visual classic, Sieve analyses, and chemical tet The primary use of "undisturbed" cohesionles samples to obtain the un weight or Felative density, The weight of soln the known volume ofthe Sample allows a reasonable determination of unit weight, and even i the sample bas been Inter disturbed by tansporting it fom the ste to the laboratory. Am attempt transfer a cobesionless sample from a tube to testing machine for strength determination isnot likely to meet with moch success A sample rebuilt inthe laboratory to the in stu weight i lacking in both natural cementation andl anisotropy which are significant factors in both strength and. pees ‘stimates. Some laboratories are ofthe opinion tit atsotrope simples can be built to duplicate in sta and thatthe samples can be “aged” to ttover some ‘natural cementation. Even assuming this ean be don, few projects could justi the expense forthe small incense n condence level obtained. Since it & neatly imporsble to recover “undisturbed” samples ‘om cohesionless deposits, dens, stength, and compressibility estimates are usually obtained fom penetration texts or other in sity ithods. Permeability may be rartonmnos sours ism season wnannpaoes 12S [fo the laboratory ee fosand the oper —— i — fps my dehycrate, Monkesonless mate fatty con be obtain Msn se oe —— Feet crural GQ == IE oe _ SSS FOURE4 Spel smping ook 0) Stpamp sampler oes of rave wi some stems hg Pera tecing« al Bea which ic fps. sper a fig methods anda t Fate rg amount Pics stownin Fg rina’ casitestiog 1s pumping ain hr 3 ame timated from well paping test, oF approximately, by bling the boring and Shseving the tine forthe water level toe some amount Disturbed Sampling Disturbed samples ate adequate to locate suitable borrow where compaction characterise and index tests foe classfeation are usally sunt. In this case a large-diameter auger (asually oly shallow depts) maybe used so that bags of representative sll maybe obtained for laboratory compaction fests, ive analyses, fd the Aterbeg limits ti Recognising the dificult, and resulting expense, of obtaining undisturbed | samples its commnon practice en most foundation projects to rely on pensation tents and recovery of disturbed samples for obtaining eximate of the soil Condition. The standard penetration tet of Sex. 37 is most commonly wed, since ‘sturbed sampl is tecovere, but oer types, particulary cones, ae also widely sed. The later devices donot recover a soi sample. Figure 3 lsat the sompling spoon also called spi spon) commonly sed, smade up of diving shoe to evar a reasonable serve ie from driving ft the soil and Bartel The barel consists of apiece of ube split (pit spoon) lengthwise wth «coupling on the upper end to connect the dil od to the sufe Tnerts (ee Fig 50) are axed when samples of thin mud and sand are to be bitchin eal Dono somo feast ice for el {St uate fel once al (i rma Bon sla cant (eo cwe some Bescon nib oe Bed samples foal Votimates are usualy Prameabity may be | secovered Ina test the samplers diven nt the soil a measured distance, with the blows recorded. The sampler ie then lightly twisted to shea thes atthe base of ‘he tube and withdrawn. The shoe and coupling are unscrewed and the two halves of the bare are opened to expose the sample. Onsite unconfined compres ge tests ae routinely made on any cohesive semples recovered. The diviag shox wal thickness of Fig 35a indents any sample recovered by this devie are likely 10 De highly distro Representative samples from the sil on the sampler bacrel ace stored in sample jas and retirmed tothe labortery fr inspection aad easifation, The fed ecnician marks the jar id with the job snd boring number, sample depth These ja samples are usually lage enough to provide sufcient material for the Auerberg limits and astral vater content. In routine work these index ‘ropes used with corelation ables and charts, ogster with gare suficient to ‘ele the foundation type estinate the allowable bearing capacity, and make sme Kin of probable secemeat estimates. This s particularly true if the soli sil shove the water table, or overconslidated and fsured where ts dificult 1 Push a thinalld sample tbe and/or obtain an intact sample for compression tes. The penetration number (a measure of revstance) i usally sficent for making both strength and settlement estimates in coesioales soil: Where the sotehnical consultant has had sunt experience to ull a reasonable data base, sreagh/setementprdietions made inthe manner are quite squats for about 85 to 90 percent of foundation work Tis that other 10 to 15 percent ofthe work which causes geotechnical the engineer Recognizing both the diel of obtaining a quality sample an of trying to return tothe, condition for laboratory testy in sta tests described in later sections may be wsed. This is parclarly tru for important sutures founded on ine to medium sands and where very sft cotesive andor organic sis tare present Only thin seam ofthese later sols may be sfient to cause reat problems, In any cas, unless competent lower strata ae close enough to decide 2 Viable foundation alternative immediatly, some testing of (or) these poor oils Wl be required ‘As the fled boring progresses and sof layers are encountered in the zones Which may infvene the foundation selecton/design, undisturbed samples are "sully taken so that consolidation and more refined laboratory strength tess can bemade Ifthe sols extremely sot or experience indicates in sit test should be sade (and the necesary equipment is avilable), only afew “undisturbed” tbe samples for consolidation tess should be taken. Asa genera utube sample for consolidation tests shouldbe atleast 12 am larger than the consolidation ing. Practice, « 76mm tube sample is often collected for use inthe 64mm (2a) diamierconslidomete. Sometines 3 Sbsmm tube sample is used with « 45am (1875%n) diamter consoldometer, but ths practice is not resommended Tube samples larger than 761mm can be obtained but i much larger than 109 mn 8 ‘Undisturbed Sampling premium may be charged forthe extra dilng effort and tube eost—paricua or tans steal tubes to contol rut Recovery of “undisturbed” spies in cobeive soil is aocomplished by replac the split spoon on the dri od with specially constructed thiaowall (16 to 1uge) seams sta tubing which shouldbe pushed, buts sometimes driv, ube length ino the soit. The tube slightly rotated, or a special euting device tached, 10 cut the sample of. Friction hold the sap athe ube asthe sam is withdrava; however, there are also special vale or piston (Fi. ‘ents which wsea pressure diferent! (uction) to eal the si ‘special sampler termed fll sampler (Fig 0) was develop (bee Hvorley (1549, p. 269}, Kjeman (1948)} 10 overcome two, pring deficiencies ofthe usual sampling tubes and piston samplers. These dflenen short sample length and sdefeetion betwoen wal and sol tis ored into sampler. Reducing se rtionZequics using short sample tubes Ione sin «el suspected of being. particulary troublesome, it may be necesery to (al continuous samples, This i not pracsial with samplers of say 1 maximal length because ofcoatiaully pulling the dil rods co atach «new tube The al sampler is « means of reovering simples 10 to 29m in leat with mim Fretion eect. The interested reader should consul the cited releences forex deals, but esenialy the sampler operates by Sit pacig it om the bottom of hl borehole Next iti pushed into the nik 24 the sample enters the tube i surrounded by 16 ol (iin metals alu 1 te wide by 31019 mm Strips which cary the saniple up the tube ition between soi and fos resi reducing the compressive strest inthe sample as the length of recovered samp increases inthe tbe, Liners which ae simply thin-walled tubes plod inside the sampler bar portion ate sometines used, The sample scold, the exterior bare opened {nd the liner containing the sample is removed though sample disturbance depends on fctors such as rate ofpeaetaton whether the cuting free is ebtained by posbing or driving and presence of gavel italso depends on the ratio ofthe volume of sl diplacoment to the volume of th collected sample exprested stn area aio Ay pi-p} 100 ) where D, = ouside diameter of tube (= lnsde diameter of cuting edge Weltdesigne sample tubes should have an area ratio of lest than about 10 perce ‘bin thin-val tube has an A, of about 13 percent 8 compu [the widely wed Example 3.1) a term wed in estimating the degre of disturbance ofa cohesie ap rock core sample i the recovery rato Ly th of recovered sample th of recovered sample q recovery ratio of 1 (ecovered length ofthe sample = the Tenth sampler wal RASS ing the stratum) indeates that, theoretically, che sample dd! aot becom er so om faction on tbe A recovery rato greater than 1.0 would od sreerrng of th sample from rearrangement of stones, rots, removal of preloay for other factors vate Baal analysis, however, engineering judem 1s the ress of ets on “undisturbed” samp neat must be relied upon exteapo eso the prediction of al behavior Sottin, Using ia menos SAD fim Te cal 1D of thea sil as aad deen on the ample asthe tubes posed it abstton nt Eq (1 ges vl 36 MARINE SAMPLING “Tne cuteat interest in ofbhor ther purposes ts well hase SSmpies. Obviously marine sampl Get han land sampling The pre feibly obtain sa general overview Conjunction with conventional onsho onstruction, primarily for energy recovers but fads demand for & means to obtain underWaeh ting Boing to be orders of magniide MOH Sat state of arts such that about al ne cl of the subsurface conditions. This is usd i ore methods (such ae pile deving or foot Seat to make afoundation design, Usually ples are driven to refusal or bear see resp taken aval vals. Aste desig database improves 9 ‘atonal methods of design wil surely be usd "There ate a number of methods for samp are in he resatch stage, but one of the more popular methods uses mount ae in al arling equipment ona boot or barge specially modified fr carve and dls through a casing exending tothe osan for. Tht method Parresed considerably inthe Gul of Mesico and along the shallower water al vets pcntal tives on both the AUantc and Pacific coasts, Penetration, vi hd preuremete ets can be made inthe borings in docper water, alferoative methods are 0 ing soils rom the ovean for hil sd including submarine pet 38 computed ance of & cohesive ie ath sampler ample didnot oot ban 10 would ind seroval of pel stb ied upon ibe prediction of ie te fle obain OD = 2g athe D of he aig it he) ia cra secovery bat i Wo obtain undenw of magitude at about al one Fein. Thine wd Psp driving o foot frst, or bain {teas improves, fom te ocean oor Fpl modified ford itor This method Fettaiower waters al beting submarine vessels and proectieaype devices which are lowered t0 the Inechanisms commanded from the surface may be ed to foe the soi sing the weight ofthe veel or device for sree ‘may contain gas or explosive charge to propel» sample thing the weight ofthe ftal device as 2 teaetion The most promising method for deep water ems 10 be to esabsh 4 connection ence about and th oan for tung casing wig re alow or wave action. A sample tubs wih drive wight atacheg eee om apart and ames) The ssemblag i then seated onthe sol inthe borehole (aftr cleaning it of loo tuttings)Next the sample i driven adstanoeof 150m to vat ton undisturbed Sel with his blow count also ecordd (unless the system weight inks the sampler S0 no XY can be coutted The blow count for ach of the next two 150mm increments i wed asthe penetration count unless the Inst increment cannot be completedcither from encountering rock ofthe count execs 50 In this case the Blow count for the last 308 mm is computed and sed for N SPT testing prior to about 1967 (according to ASTM) only required the sampler to be seated and then driven 305 mm. This could reduce the N count realy 80 percent since the frat 150 mm of requied seating produces substemial fretio resistance on the sampler fo the next 305 mm. Sadly, many curent SPT éertelations are based on N values from this ear procedure The boring log shows “zfusal” and the testi halted if 1. 50 blows are required for any 10mm increment. 22.100 blows ate obtained. 4. 10 successive blows produce no advance The boring log may show a ratio as 70/100 or 50/100 indicating that 7 (or 50) blows resulted in a penetration of 100 mm (4) but this isnot an ASTM reauirement Excessive equipment wear. as well suet eu deiing meterage results when blow counts are high, Standardization of ful at 100 bows allows al the diling organizations to standardize cost so that higher blow counts result in & negotiation for higher costlength of boring or regu some ype of coring operation Prior to~and afler—ASTM standardization it was regulary observed that, W values in adjacent borchols oom using diferent equipment a adjacent les were not reproducible. Besne of wide SPT use this problem received mush atention—fist by Gibbs and Holt (957) who considered overburden pressure ‘nd leath of dil rod were the principal eases of nonreproductiity. BeVoad this not much was done unil de Mello (1971) present a comprehensive ierature survey which started a focus onthe desing energy [Schmertmann (1975) Discrepancies canbe caused from items such a using a warped/ wor driving shoe, pushing a rock (usualy detected by an experienced drier) and allowing 4 ‘tick condition inthe hole bostom by to rapid withdrawal of auger o bit pl. of ftom a dflerentil water ve between GWT and i ole or stem of oll auger). This later is voided by atention tothe ASTM standard The sats ofthe deve shoe can be ensured by regular inspection, and especialy ater ard driving This leas the input devng energy and its dspation around the sampler Into the surrounding si asthe principal actors forthe wide range in N vale Te should be evident thatthe blow count would be diety related to the Avving energy which is thooretcally computed as follows ean and subttuting Eq, () into Ea. (@) we obtain w (gh) = We where = weight or mass of hammer and h~ height of fll This give, for andard 635 kg hater and h~ 762m (30a, the heretical input devil coer of = 635 x 9807 x 0762 = 4745 (3,499) =39-R Energy measurements show thatthe acta! input diving energy to th sampler to produce penetration bas been found to range from about 30 to 8 ferent by Kovacs and Salomone (1982) and from about 70 to 100 percent Riggs ea. (1983). I appeats these diserepancis ars from factors such as 1. Bguipment from diferent manufcturer, There area large variety of ding rigs incutren! use however, the rotary auger of Fig. 3-34 withthe safety hare 2 Drive hammer configurations of Fig. 3-7—the anvil aso seems to have some intucnce onthe amount of energy input co the sample. 3. Whether (ihe hammer wses an automatic trip with the drop beight h contcolled (&) a vope-athcad (low speed power takeoff pally) system is used (ee Fig 48) with, dependent on i diameter and condition of rope it diameter and condition of cathead (usty, clean et nd whether using 125 or 200 min diameter—200 mm is common in North Ameries) i. number of turns of rope around catbead as Tf 23, et. I appeas thats sominal 2 turns optimum and in wide se. There may be some influence on wheter the rope polled from the top (1 turns) or from the bottom (2} turns) ofthe ethead the actual op height at which the operator eleases the rope to allow the hammer fee al. Riggs (1986) sugess the operator commonly ‘veritsan average of SO mm (actual drop height ~ 810mm) This eu ffom the operator pulling the rope int the soning cahead (Fig. 34) td viswaly observing the Ht to'a mark (ee Fig. 7) on the guide rod fd then rkasing the rope back toward the eathead soit loosens and 1 This 30, for ‘rica inp ving 93 ing every, oth fom about 30 to (Oto 100 percent by factors such a8 oe varity of dig {hth safety harm seers to have som {ah controlled i em is ued (2 Fig od whether wig ‘orth Ameria) 23, ete Tt appeass There may be some (1 tums) or fom 8 he rope to allow ‘operator commonly 10mm, This resi geathead (Fig 34) 7) on the guide rol 30 loosens aod allows the hammer to fill Reston time and mark visibility results in {his overt. The operator commonly obtains 40 to 50 blowin 44. Whether a inersused inside the split barrel sample, ide riton increases the Arvin resistance (end N) and iss without thelner (shown in Fig 3-5) Tis common practice otto use a liner Also it would app that values should be larger for sis with OCR > I (and larger relative density D,) than for soils normaly consolidated, Overbutdenpressure~ soil of the same density wil gve smaller N vals is smaller (as near the ground surfs). Oversize boreholes onthe order of 13010 18 reece aero 210 mm wil algo reduce N unless a rotary hollow stem suger is used wi fuger left in cose contact with the soil in the hole bottom, Deg ‘emenation may als be significant in giving higher N counts in cementdy ‘which may have ite overburden pressure Length of drill rd~above about 10 m the rod length doesnot seem ei however, for shorter lengths and N < 30it is This fc was fis examina Gibbs and Holts (1957) and later by McLean et al (1975) and other Schmertmann (1979) who wsed a computer model to analy the luca rod length as wel as other factors such as sampler ressance From te several recent studies ced (and their reference ists) i has suggested thatthe SPT be standardized to some energy rao &, whith shoul computed as = Stal hammer enery to sampler Es . input ener, E, oo ‘There are proposal to compute By based on the measured hammer velo limpet with than ora the mestred energy inthe dri od jst below the Would appear, however, that using the theoretical value given by Ey (fol ‘would be preferable ae it not equipment dependent Since there is wide seater in and the rein blow count V when reasonable to expect there should be a unique N for the wil at some dept i nergy ratio value By. To this way a Gril ig with, s3y, B= 49 wou ajustment othe standard Ey compute approximately the same N count ra Gril rig with E, = 70. Thee ae several current suggestions forthe vale of Standard eneray rato Eg a follows 5000S (we 8) Sehmemane fm Roberton a (ORD The author will use 70 since the more recent data using current dil quipment with a safety or an automatic hummer and with drier attention [ASTM D 1586 dtalls inden this ilo tothe actual energy ratio, ob aia North American practice Ifa dierent standard energy rio By s spel however, isa teva exercise to convert tothe diferent base as wll be sho folowing Thestandad blow count V9 canbe computed from themeasuredN aol Ngg= Gy N 5m Xs a Xe ger is wed wit Where Ng = adjusted N using the subscript forthe Ey and thet indicate it has bouom. Deze been acjusted, atin cemente Cy=adjustnent Tor overburden presure computed (see Liso and Whitman (198) as: asst examine) 15) and olber sys the influence is kt kPa for kglem? m= 1 9576 3 ‘init has a YE. which should ‘The value ofp the sefeence overburden pressure which has been some what arial taken at 2k ot kg ne adjustment ctor fom (and computed as shown) Table 33 100 « ‘Note that large values of, dcreese the blow count N nearly nearly, that i gs Gives N= 20 and Eg ives N= 10; however, using the “standard” valu of Ese Gives an N valve for ue in Eq, @-3) of N= 13 for ether dil rig We obtain ths by noting thatthe energy rao x blow count should bea constant so bamner velit jue blow the an en by Ea (efor By Bax Ny= Bax Ms © sroovot N when at some depth iti ood to a sande B= 45 would ne count a ome foe che value of te wre Et aN on) Sine we will we E, =70 this gives, in pera ie For the previous example of Fy = 20 we obtain 5 45 XN giving m= 8 @0) Ie we conyerted Ny to Nog we have Sing current ding a dr attention ‘alo B,obained it tio Ey is spoil, ‘605 wil be shows =15_ which i tanger as prdited by Ea. (@)) Using the reationship given by Ea (e) we can readily convert any energy rato to ny other base but we do have to know the energy ratio at which the Blow count trae obtained inal. asured Wasfollow ) 138 roan Factors, for Eq. (-3t Tei evident that al y,= 1 for the eat ofa small bore hole no sampler Kinet length of dil rod over 10 m (30) andthe given dil ig has E,~ 7. In this cal the only adjustments for overburden pressure using Cy, This observation is mae sinc there are several epiions on corsetons 1. Do nothing which with current equipment and conditions may be neal comet. This may have an advantage of detstinginrease of sol hens With depth and upper variations may inate cementation gf OCR > 1 2. Adjust only for overburden pressure (ll = 1 and Cy = some value) 4 Use Eq. (3). This is probably the best method but requires cquipmeal callration for &,-—both equipment and operator. It wll lo require relat 2 pert onal hole, no sample tn as, = 70 In this ca “is observation smal ions may be oss ae of sol ties ion of OCR > I ut requires equiped “il also require regula recalibration of the individual dling sax to sccount for wear general ‘quipment changes with use, This prooadure will probably become mandatory fe extrapolate N data soross geographic regions where diferent equipment (Gnd Ese Conventional practice ie to do an SPT every 1 or 2m (2} or Sf) afer penetating the topsoil o starting the fist test at about | to IY m depth. For each {Br there «sample reovery of about 460 mm (18 in) incding the seating depth to provide visual profile of around 50 percent ofthe boring depth ‘Cobesionlss sample are visalyypected and a portion saved in gs jar con which is marked jo, boring number depth, and fd N. Cohesive samples are ttemed similarly except ge tte are routinely made—most often vsing pocket penetometr (se Fig 3-9) for sever values with the average recorded. A small ompresion machine ca be taken othe eld for 4, tests; however, boats of the cre adjustment for strain (shown of Fig. 2-23) ths not commonly done. As a Supplement in cohesive sols itis unual practice to take several thinwall tube Samples or laboratory testing a8 necessary (and to verily the Belg) "The original SPT was develope for sand: however, a present ts commonly done ut the given depth fr al soils Several cxampes wil strate the wse of Eq (3) Required: What is te sanded" ased on F4= Wank Eee C= (°S7) = 114 fom Table 33 sample computation shown Told £5 10m T= 100, oul United States ratio no ne vamp 33 ow 216 (only ges) 2.2 ut with ample nea ad, = 4. 10 (deme and en) n= 1.05 HrvoRnON see. AND NAT su ASHES LA mp 34 Sune a sample 32 but = Sy; = 10KPs; 205mm boll set age, hate eon = 6 Nae Bisa ar 38 SPT CORRELATIONS The SPT has ben use in correlations for unt weight relative density D,, angle of intemal freton @, and undrained compressive strength 4, For reasons it the preceding section these willbe of questionable vale partic! sine many were ‘egpested prior extensive study ofthe large mumbo variables afecng the ‘lus. The data shown in Table 3-4 for Dy sad relate roughly to Ny and for borehole depths onthe order of 4 to 6 m a for spread foundations TABLE Epica vals for gD,» and unit weight of granular soils bused on the SPT. bout 6 m dep and norm ‘aluesn Table shouldbe wed ction, tower, a umber ig Intra ND and such a aging satura comectation, wae, ng soil grains, what relative terms such as fine, medium and coarse constitute, a 4 telainsip for and D, was proposed inde by Mesh 9S Skempton (1986) shows that A and B tend tobe site dependent with a rangeig for ive sols from 15 to about Si and in B from 0.306 to 0.204 (onthe Ny This spread is such that using an average valve for A and B is somewhat however, the average B with im KPa. For about 6m depth we obtain Niy/D? = 60 which i 85 a guide in designating the N values for normally consolidated san Table M4 ‘Skempton (1986) also suggested adjustments for OCR > 1 as = 32.4 0286p, a 4+ BCcxr, os where Coc th ratio ofthe mean normal elective testes (as wed fr tral presen Chap. 2) forthe normally and overcosolidated cses to obttin Coon 14 2Ksoon aeons Use any of Eas. 218) through (225) to obtain the lateral earth pre coaicents K, CCorrciations fr N vay have been given inthe form of where the coeficient tends 1o beste dependent: however, value of been used (Le, for N~ 10, q, = 28 kal}, Corelations for Nand conssene cohesive deposits (sot sill hard, et) ae given in Table 35, ‘With current practie of recovering samples and routinely inspecting th ‘nd performing on st tess with a pocket penetrometer, strength correla are not recommended. Consistency correlations are very poor anyway boca ‘atiations in OCR, aging sample water content, presence or absence of del “uid, locaton of GWT, and generally variability of sol deposits, 2 310 “ tase number ofl fon, water, angular by Meyer (19th dent with a range 10s (on the Nie (628 is somewhat a os 02 = 60 whichis ‘conolidated sind R> tas 6 (as wed for tana seroranon mer, 00 war0 sou emer 16) Comsistoney of strated cobesve sist Site ces ge wen gd x ‘ey en ome pce 49. DESIGN N VALUES Early recommendations were to use the smallst N value in the boring or an average ofall the value, Current practic is to use an average N but in the zone of interest For example fra spread footing the 2one of interes is rom about one hal he footing with B above the estimated Bae loation toa depth of 2 blow, Weighted averaging using depth increment = Nis urvally preferable 19 an For pls theres merit in averaging the N count or any given stratum unless itis go thik (a eative term), where one or more subdivisions might be we, ‘The average Wi (or other base value) can then be computed fom the average Nand strats daa, o individual Ny values ean be computed and then Prior to about the mid-sntis value were adjusted when taken blow the seater abl however, current practice not to apply water able corretions. fone ‘eto ue values to obtein the stresestruin moduli, which generally increases with depth, reat cares required in adjusting N, For exampl using Cain Ea 3) Would modify any toa value coresponding to.a depth producing 9 95.76kPa (2ksf) and eliminate most of any appuret depth eects On the other hand, fw want unigue value of fora zone of say, 2B beneath a spread footing we should use Cy with the several W values and average the els OTHER PENETRATION METHODS There are a number of ether penetration methods in use of which the cone penetration test ofthe nea section appears be the next most widely use ater the SPT. Figure 310 isa Swedish weight sounding method used in preliminary site studies. The dvie i pushed to @ depth and weights added nt begins to sl: tum ito the ground. The weight and numberof hallcurs to advance 1 m are (eebaded I's weight of 100g Joes ot start the device ii turned by hand with {he alfturn eorded for 100 kg. The so types elated tothe weight versus tr thot (sof si, medium clay, le) This test Sometimes used in Europe and Japan but not moch elsewber. igure Aliya dynamic coe penetrometer. Cone dimensions and shape ‘aries omc but the more common shape with typical dimensions i shown. A Tne cig commonly 50k fling 00 mm) is wed to advance the cone, Some ‘Shurgurtions alow the dive cod tobe pled leaving the cone in place. The test fas uppicton in hard or gravely sil Tis tet snot used inthe United States but has considerable popolrity elsewhere. ‘Data usualy number of Blows to advance the cone in increments of Trgore 3:12 are 6? cones used in very gravely soils Data ae collected Sdentcal tothe SPT and the same diving weight and height ofall are usually wed ‘The Palmer and Stuart (cone) is used some ia the United Kingdom snd ccasinilly lewhere igur13 ira hand beld penetrometer developed by the US. Waterways Experiment Station. "The devise hes application at shallow depts o to check the ‘hus ofpread fotngso the bas oflarge dlameter drilled pers. Lean also be used to find local soft ares where compaction conto is exered “These devises and variations on them ae deicebed inthe two Proceedings of European Sympostans on Pencnaton Testing (Stockholm (1978), Amsterdam (9 PENETRATION TEST (CPT) The CPT isa simpletest that is becoming very widely usd in ew ofthe SPT for tat days and fine to medium coarse sands. The test does not have any pplication in gravels and stffhard clays The testis performed by pushing the ‘Standard cone (according to ASTM D 3441 with a 60° point and base diam 537mm with cronesectton area of 10cm?) into the ground ata rate of 10 to SDmmiy The test may be penodicaly halted to attach 11m rods to extend the dept however some push soafgurations allow extra length of rod fora nearty ‘continous push ‘Data coleted is the dp resistance 4, and sleeve friction resistance q, and cause of the lage quantity of data‘on a continuous push clestronic data awison cquipmencs usally used Thirmay bein the form of strip reorders or {iat signals fed into a microcomputer. The microcomputer bas an advantage i that small sales requ for most strip chart records can be avoided “There sala five cone configurations eurreny being se: 1. Mechical—the eacies type often calle the "Dutch cone” since it originated inthe Nethedands, A typ later configuration wih a frition sleeves shown on Fig. 3 pt ua (al esse 4, and alow measur int resivanel Pirstion pickup shock xo that he (1985) to measure th tet is usual very hard sols or sock are not encountered forthe depth of inteest.The ets als ‘ery rapid when eletronic data acquisition equipment i wed, Data from the CPT is tsed to establish allowable bearing capacity and for pile design, Data may be used to corroborate other testing methods and ean be Used fo approximately clasfy sis inthe range in which the tests applicable Daa generally requires supplemental informatio fom othe exploration methods (Gorings and sample recovery for laboratory ets and visual inspection) since there is usually substantial seater ia the penetration recor. ‘Typically the point resistance and seve friction are used fo compute a fection ratio fas n= Bx 100 Sands usually have a friton ratio fe <1 percent; clays are lager and peat may have afe> 5 or 6 percent 18 room ana AN ORC ‘typical dataset is shown on Fig. 315b as obtained from an electric ong ting stip recorders and. continuous logging With a mechanical con til procedure sin steps axon Fig. 314b wherein position | the cone is seated: posing FTadvances the cone tip to measure qs position 3 advances the fiction sleeve i ‘measure qs and position 4 advances both sleeve and tpt measure 4, = 4. + gg ‘Ths prosedre gives check on g, which can be computed 8 4: a ~ 41 compare wth tht from position 3 The rition ratio i computed using Ba. C. ‘Cone data may be dietly used in design—usually the parameter of inttag is some multiple af 1s sometimes wed in correlations 10 relat othe desig propery of interest such sy elative density D, for sands and tothe unérane Shear stength for eabesve sols or soll clatifcation (Fig. 3-16) Iti ala Converied fo equivalent SPT N values All of these corrationt have song Following; however, there fa substantial scatter and alternative verfcation shoul be used whenever possible (auch as borings with sample recover). The cone bearing resistance qe has been related to the undrained she strength using an approximation ofthe bearing capacity equation ofthe ne ‘hapter 1o ideally q a8 an “ultimate bering strength” and and solving for, 9] Js a fh By rans fath/ A sits Fitey ay / Ce ey, {tA rom 20 ec cong Inecssical coe ty tooeis sete: postog Fie ction eee Dmeasure a = 4. + ge fed as «4 a puted ing Ba. parameter of tea forelste co the desig fd (othe undrsingd (ig 316) 1s ale froltons have somal the verfction shou the undrained shea ‘egoton of the net 4 oy where p.= ye = overburden presure at point where q, is measured as pre ‘ously defined and used fad in units of.) Nc cone faetor (or constant fr that sila that point) and has been found to range frm about Sto 7S, however, most values are i the 10 to 30 range with values between 15 and 20 commonly ated Figure 317 san approximate corclation which might be wed. Aas etal (1986) suggest adjusting q for pore presure to a otal valve computed as where a= a area ratio which depends onthe cone type (gap behind cone and locaton of piezometer Fig 14a has a gap behind the cone) sr measured pore presure as previously defined With tis adjustment the undained shear strengths is computed as 6%) Here Nar isthe coe factor ain the previous equation but wih the T subscript to identify the adjustment ing ogy. Tis claimed that wsing gy area reduces the seater in the cone bearing and inthe sone factor). Aas etal (1986) report CCohesionlss Soils results ofthis adustment for a numberof cays where the seater was suiceny reed thatthe following equation (author interpretation) can be usd 81, Thus fora clay with a plasticity index Ty botwoen 132 and 172. in general one should obtain several tube sampes and obtain 5 vals to establish te likely values) of Nz of Nee tne factors suchas OCR. ran sz, any Unit weigh, cementing. aging. ee, are sghifcant variables, For morally Consolidated clays of low snsitity (ay S,< 4) and Ip 30 vals of Ny ofan Band Nur of 14 may be saisactory c 7 cg 0 we Would expect Ney = 152 4 206 Figure 318 isa conaton for relative density D,. This gure sepresents the thors comporite of two revisions by chmertmann (978) and ltr compariey, ‘OcK et by Scena ne eter Was suing Dean bewsed G19) obtain valves t [OCR grain zs and thles For normally {value of No about fore represents the td later comparison ‘otnOn rune Axo mason weasRBues 181 by Vit and Mitchell (1981). This figure isto be used with Fig. 2-24 0 estimate ‘he angle of internal fection for sands as identi Figure 3-190 and ae relations for to sien by Begemann (1974) and Robertson and Campania (0983), These gures represent several recommendations or are the ret of several Previous tal correlations. Figure 3-196 only applies for normally consolidate, uncemented sands For sands with OCR > I the angles tend to be one to wo egres larger There isa problem with cemented sands, however, where some work indicates that cementation may give very lage increases ing without the same tendency io increase. This means that forall pratl purposes cemented sand has a significant cohesion interoep. Ifyou use parameters rom correlations, use as many correlations s practic and ifthere sno large seater, average thereat I there ea large etter ve ‘consideration to obtaining samples otherwise, you have a considerable exereae ginerng judement Since there sa large data ase of SPT cortelatons, some effort has been directed to oblaining a correlation between q. and N. Figure 3-20 gives a ‘elationship between the ratio Nan the mean grain sie. The mean grin size eine 8 the Dag size from a sieve analysis (6 Fig, 2b which shows Dao = 5mm for the “poorly graded” soil OF the several parameters studied, rl Sie has been found to give the Jest seater inthe ge versus telaonsip Rogue Estimate ange of ine ton Solaion. (= 8 1135 85 2P (ete preas) 0 poeta curves and down and ob = 36518 shove D, = 10 and iace maxinum b= 1tduccan tin, = 1s Fg 2b We could ue = (which is igh i i somewhat doubl whether the 1 woul peobaly ao se over 4 autos an F inn, recs nah Di relasonship, Pot obin 9 ~ 3458 ‘pLonne vrs. AND aT son wea SS Fig. 16 an ote the pt it the sty and Zone and ites rom tbe From Fig 317 extn = 18 (sing out jas made asst or a i ead Sit we would expect an Jn te order 10 o es) With ti eta we ca se $12. FIELD VANE TESTING (FYT) The vane shear tet is substantially wed method to estimate the in situ unrined shear stength of very soft sensitive, Baesrined soil deposits, Strictly ii the consolidaed-undraned shea strengths, which is obtained inthe vane seat test since the test starts rom the current contlidated ae (une of curs, ther has ‘boxn a recent increase in overburden pressure a rom a il), The testis performed by inserting the vane into the soil and applying ‘orque. The vane may be inserted rom the bottom ofa borehole or pstied without sthole by using a vane sheath sila to cone penetration text with the vane thea extended telow the shes forthe atual test Equipment details vary somewhat however, the vane device shown on Fig. 321ais ity typical witha traue applied through the reduction gears shown so the rate is at about 1 to 6° per minute with provision to measure the ange of rotation (hich can be computed according 10 8 = "7116 fom mechanic of material andcan become quite large when the depth “tothe vaneison the order of6t0 10m). Is neces tomeaseor ells for the tiction (both soil and bearings) inthe torque rods so this can be ducted fom ‘he otal peak torque (see Fig. 218) 0 obtain the shear strength torque, Also tis commento crank the vane to fair, then continue cranking for 10 to 12 revolutions to remold the sil at the vane rest a period and then make &remolded ‘ane shear testo obtain the remolded torque The vane torgve T (corrected fr friton) is imply (#20) an To sca(Sh Where dy k= diameter and height of vane blades and usually hid = 2 constant for type of eyinder end shear assumed by use or uniform end shear (usutl assumption) =} for parabolic end shear foe teangular end shear The vane may be rectangular or tapered (ASTM D 2573) When hd = 2and a = 3 Eq. (11) splifes in terms of undrained shear vane strength to oamer 62) @ and with d and inconsistent units ‘Similar to tbe SPT the vane teste made every 0.75 to 1m of depth The vane shea test requies some interpretation. AL present it peneally assumed that the i 25 ales too large for design. Bjerrum (1992) back ‘computed a number of embankment failures on soft clay and proposed | 313) 7 Femina topmdintieroedchurethg 30h hare nchsclane Dares ll high-on the order of2. Walker (1985) found reasonable correlation beeween snd iaaal laboratory tests (and also notes the test becomes dificult t depths much over 10m), ‘Anisotropy isa significant ator inthe measured v. design also, Tis obvious that a vertical vane Blade wil shear a cylinder of sell whose edges are Perpendicular tothe horizontal bedding plane while the ends will hear cular §eas tht are parallel Another significant factor is how to use the vane seat tat to detect the effects of OCR > 1 Te is evident that one cannot use the vane shear test alone for a site exploration, but it may be a usefl tool in conjunction with other borg and ‘sample ecovery so that ast specific correlation can fit be eaablshed and then the vane test sed to make an economia elargement of the data Bae \ 313. THE BOREHOLE SHEAR TEST (BST) intrest. Nex the shear head is cacy srt into the hole othe point wher the shear strength sto be measured. "The test proceeds by expanding the seratd liner halves into the si applying prsure fom the surface through ping spstem. Next the cinder ‘Pulled wih the pling load and displacements rsorded. The expansion pressure ‘cand the pling load canbe converted to the shear strengths io make plot sil Fig 22th fo obtain tein sito strength parameters and c Figure 33 illustrates theese details ofthe test whic was developed Oh rR Handy at lowa State University around 1967 and is sometimes called th Towra Borehole Shear Test” The est undoubtedly isa drained shear test wher th sols latina feo-draining snc the drainage pth rom the sear head eration short if the tests peformed in the displacement range of about 05 mm/min 0 och point whe ves nt the sol by Naat the evlinde fapasion pressure Po makes plot are hearts whore th ear head serrations ut 0S mm mina 34 THE FLAT sont - Bor avi. Aer ino 975. les, This ate may be too fast, however, for saturated clays and Demartincourt and Bauer (1983) have proposed adding pore presure transducer othe shear heads and motorizing the pull (wich was intaly done by and cranking with eduction searing). With poe pressure measurement iis posse to obtain both total and ‘Secive stes parameters from any borehole shear tet ‘The est isappicable for al ine-rained sols and may be done even where a trace gravel present It has prucular appeal ia good quay boteboe can be produoad and for modest depth in liew of “undvtrbod” sample recovery and Taboratry testing DILATOMETER TEST (DMT) “This tat consist of inserting the dilatometer probe of Fig. 3-24 tothe depth of interest 2 by pushing or driving. The CPT pasting equipment can be used for insertion of the device and in sis where the SPT Nis greater than 33 to 40 the device ca be driven or ped from the bottom a a predriled borehole sing SPT 100) and if samples for rock quality of Strength testing are required i wil be necessary to replace the soil il with ‘ling equipment. OF couse, i he ook Is lose to the ground surlce i wil recesary 10 ascertain Iie represent a competent rock siatum oF i only Suspended boulders). Whete rock i involved, i is useful to have brckground in geology. A knowledge ofthe area pology will be uf to de fock strata vers suspended boulders whose size can be. approxi determined by probing (or driliag) Tor he outline. A knowledge of ea geology tlzo scl both to delineate the type of rock and probable quality (a 5 Substantially fractured ffom earth movements, ete). This may save consider ‘expense in taking coe samples rnc thee quantity and depth ar Both depe on anticipated Iype and quality of the rock Rock cores are necesary if he soundness of the rock is to be esa however core sale than those rom the AWT core bit (Table 6 end tb up inside the dri haret. Larger cores alo havea tondency to break uP (rt inside the barel and degrade) especialy ithe rok i soft of fred. Dri small holes and injecting colored grout (@ water-cement mixture) int the ‘in sometimes be used to recover relatively intact samples, Colored gout out the fesure and with some care the cocngs from several adjaceat borings can sed fo orien the curt) ‘Unconfined and hiph-pessre cial tests can be performed on reso cores to determine the elastic propertizs of the rock. These test are performed Picts of sound rock from the eore simple and may wie much higher compres Strength in aboratry testing han the “tetve™ strength available rom tbe ras similar to reali sured ly. Figur 3-32 illustrate several commonly sed dri bits, whic are attached a pose of hardened sel tube (casing) 06 to 3m long. In the dling operation Tat and easing rotate while presure is applied, thus grinding a groove around "ype standard designation and sles fr rock dil easing (Gare and bist feos: ly ol Meo: dil wi food one wl Mech to ave a fil bs tefl 0 Eiht apron ie rare sc Be cal Go fy se cons hr both dep hiro be estab ibe 8) tendo ft break up ( Sor Sssoed Dil Colored grou out Gincent borings ca selcmed on tes are performed ‘sabe fom the ‘which are atacad £ eiling operation wa groove around ‘core. Water under pressure i forced down the bare and into the bit to carry the rock dust out ofthe hole se the water is cicalated. “The recovery-ratio term wed ear also is signifcane for core samples. A recovery ratio ear 10 usualy indicates good-quality cock. Ia badly sued or Soft rocks the recovery ratio may be 05 of les. Rock quality designation (ROD) san index or measure ofthe quality of rock mass [Stagg and Zienkiowier (1968)} wed by many engineers ROD i ‘computed from recovered cove samples RQD oa Teagth of core advance For example core advance of 1500 mm produced a sample length of 1310 mm consting of dust, gravel and intct pier of rock, The stm of lengths of pices OO mm or lrg (pices vary Kom gravel to 280 mam) in length is 890 mm The recovery ratio Ly ~ 1310/1500 = O87 and RQD = 89/500 = 058, The rating of rock quality may be used to approximately establish field redvetion of medulus of elasisity and/or eompresive stength and the olowing may be wed esa guide Depth of Rock Cores There are no fst rules for rock core depths. Generally one shoul! core ap mately a follows 1. A dep suficently to fcate sound rock ort jointed toa very great depth, 2 For heavily loaded members such as piles or died piers « dept approximately 304m below the location ofthe base. This is to eheck thal sound” rock does not have discontinuities at a lower depth in the Local building codes may give requirements fr coring; however, ore they give allowable bearing pressures which can he used if one can some ascertain the rock quality without coring "Adjacent core holes can be used obtain relative rock quality by compa «rosshoke seismic wave veloc in sty to laboratory values on ntact sample | {he eld value lexi indicates features ad jointing inthe rock mass be holes, Downhole and surface methods are of litle value in this procedure sg and separating the 80 is part ofthe wave travel en the overlaying 4 Impossible with any coadenee 3418 GROUNDWATER TABLE (GWT) LOCATION Groundwater affets many element of foundation design and onstreton so GWT should te established as accurately as posible i is within the pr construction zone other it sncesary only to determine where it 0 this ater ease the Ioction within +0.3 to 05m is usually adequate The GWT is generally determined by messuing to the stablized water inthe borehole after suitable time lapse often 240 48b ate, nso wit permeability, such as sands and graves, 24h is adequate forthe water ler Stabilize unless the hole hasbeen somewhat sealed with deling mod. In sis low permeability such assis, ne silty sand, and clay, it may take several aya several week forthe GWT to stabilize In neary all cases ifthe GWT isto be accurately located itis physic measured by lowering a weighted tape down the hol. In theory we might 319 NI should core appr at iti rated al led piess a doth hiss check that i pth in the ste however, more oil Fone can somehay quality by comparing son tat same ing the 0 neat construction so is within the prob ne where i not Fa adequate Stabilized water kel set. In sol wit il foe the water level i ing mud In ie wl] >eory we might 319 NUMBER AND DEPTH OF BORINGS Hrionnos suerens Aso Ba so Means TL 1. Plot dase of stration S with dept its posible to elably compute S.A eet plot of water content may te ust but for S= 100 percent my can ocreate asthe void ratio decteses rom overburden pressure. 2 Filth ole and bali out. fe Baling a quantity, observe if the water lvl in {he oles rising or fling. The rue level is between the bailed point where the water was fling and the bailed depth where its hing. Ths method implies a Tasge permeability so that t would be more practical to simpy bal the hole move to the ext hol locaton and let the water be stabizing while other holes se ile, (One may spply a computational method however, this quires caping the hole and taking periodic depth measurement tothe water tale as done for dee ‘measurements and since no one (othe author's knowiedge) computes the depth the method is no Tonge ive (bat may be obtain rom the previous editions of this textbook). Soil strength (or bearing pressure) ie usully reduced Below the water table Foundations below the water table willbe uplifted by the water presure and, of ‘ours, some kind of dewatering scheme must be employed ifthe foundations eo ‘be constructed "inthe dy There is no clear-

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen