Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Workplace
Both job performance and the employees' level of happiness
impact the potential of success for an organization.
Charles D. Kerns, PhD
Performance and happiness go hand in hand in making an organization
successful.[1] With both an appropriate performance management system and
a positive approach to influencing people that increases happiness, an
organization's key results can more likely be achieved and sustained.
Which of the following types of persons would you prefer to have in greater
numbers in your organization?
Which of the following types of persons would you prefer to have in greater
numbers in your organization?
An interesting and useful way of viewing people and groups across the two
dimensions of performance and happiness is depicted in Figure 1. Happy and
sad faces, with arrows symbolizing high and low performance, represent the
four permutations in this analysis. The author often uses this matrix with
executives to discuss their own situation as well as that of the people in their
organizations. References in this article to the various quadrants are used for
thought and discussion purposes only. For more specific analysis of areas of
relative strength and weakness for a particular individual or group within an
organization, see thePerformance-Happiness Self-Assessment
Survey here.
Performance-Happiness Matrix
Negative low performers can keep organizations from reaching their full
potential. Their own lack of success drags down overall performance. Perhaps
more significantly, unhappy low performers can infect others with negative
attitudes and become negative role models, exacerbating the impact of their
unhappiness, and allowing counterproductive behaviors to creep into the
workplace.
For instance: Having been given the same assignments numerous times, Peter
was unhappy and frustrated. While he continued to be a high performer in his
current position, Peter believed that no one cared about his development and
was contemplating looking for another position.
Perhaps the initial way for a managerial leader to think about how to influence
the happiness level of his or her employees is in relation to the employee's
present situation. For example, engagement with one's work can likely be
enhanced by having an individual assess her "strengths" and utilize those
strengths in her work. This may include coaching to help the individual use her
strengths in innovative ways. An employee's level of engagement at work, and
subsequent happiness, is likely boosted when he or she has the opportunity to
do what he or she does best at work – utilizing one's strengths is a positive
experience. (This could likely help Mary, the Q2 Unhappy Low Performer, move
toward Q4.)
A Call to Action