Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Department of Justice
Office of the City Prosecutor
Manila
-versus-
Resolution
It was alleged that on July 4, 2019 at about 3:45 PM, respondent were
arrested after he was caught in the act of accepting the money in the
entrapment operation.
Prior to the arrest of the respondent, the police officers received a report that
there were an alleged illegal activities engaged in the manufacturing and
production of believed faked school certificates at the area of C.M Recto
Avenue corner Morayta Street and along Quezon Boulevard, all were in Sta.
Cruz Manila.
For one to be held liable for “other deceits” under the law, it is required to
probed the following essential elements: (1) false pretense, fraudulent act or
pretense other than the preceding articles; (2) such false pretense,
fraudulent act or pretense must be executed prior to or simultaneously with
the commission of the fraud; and (3) as a result the offended party suffered
damage or prejudice. (Guinhawa vs. People, 468 SCRA 278 (2005)
In the case of Nierva vs. People of the Philippines, 503 SCRA 114, the
Supreme Court said: If a person had in his possession a falsified document
and he made use of it, taking advantage of it and profiting thereby, the clear
presumption is that he is the material author of falsification.
GIL B. MENDOZA
Senior Assistant City Prosecutor
Member, Ninth Division
MCLE Compliance VI No. 0002031
Issued on: March 27, 2017
Copy Furnished:
1) PSSG GLICERIO ENCELA – Manila District Field Unit, NCR-CIDG, 2nd
Floor, Logistics Buiding, MPD Headquarters, United Nation Avenue,
Ermita, Manila
2) PMS ROBERTO CHUA - Manila District Field Unit, NCR-CIDG, 2nd
Floor, Logistics Buiding, MPD Headquarters, United Nation Avenue,
Ermita, Manila
3) PSMS RUEL CHU - Manila District Field Unit, NCR-CIDG, 2nd Floor,
Logistics Buiding, MPD Headquarters, United Nation Avenue, Ermita,
Manila
4) LOTH AGUILAR y DAHAW – Bilibid Viejo, Quiapo, Manila