Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Epigenetic modifications
In eukaryotic cells, DNA is packaged into chromatin, work on model systems it is now clear that epigenetic
Chemical additions to and covalent modifications on the histone proteins of alterations can indeed be involved in the environmen-
the DNA and histones that the chromatin and modifications on the DNA itself can tally triggered phenotypes. To date, much of the focus in
are stably maintained and influence the expression of genes. When heritable from ‘environmental epigenetics’ has been on DNA methyla-
do not change the primary
one cell generation to the next, such modifications are tion, which is essential in development and is involved
DNA sequence.
referred to as epigenetic modifications and can bring about in processes such as genomic imprinting and silencing
Epigenomes lasting changes in gene expression1,2. Epigenetics is the transposable elements2,6,11. In mammals and insects,
The overall epigenetic study of mitotically and/or meiotically heritable changes cytosine methylation is found almost exclusively in the
modifications of cells. An in gene function that cannot be explained by changes in context of CpG dinucleotides, but in plants it also occurs
organism has multiple, cell
type-specific, epigenomes
DNA sequence3. in CHG and CHH contexts (where H = A, T or C). The
Genome-wide patterns of DNA and chromatin modi- DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) that establish and
fications (‘epigenomes’) do not persist throughout life, maintain the patterns of DNA methylation have been
but undergo precise, coordinated changes at defined studied in detail2. Less well understood are the processes
stages of development, particularly in mammals. These that dictate where in the genome DNA methylation is
1
Institute of Molecular
transitions contribute to the lineage- and tissue-specific established and subsequently maintained, and it is these
Genetics (IGMM), CNRS
UMR‑5535 and the expression of genes2,4–6. In mammals, and to a lesser processes on which environmental signals could have a
University of Montpellier, extent in plants, epigenetic modifications are reset upon considerable impact.
1919 route de Mende, passage through the germ line. This epigenetic repro- Histone methylation patterns also can be somati-
34293 Montpellier, France. gramming prepares the germ cells for development in cally stable, and can mediate the silencing or activation
2
Department of Immunology
and Oncology, Centro
the next generation. Besides the developmental ontogeny of genes during development. Dimethylation and tri-
Nacional de Biotecnología of epigenetic modifications, there is also considerable methylation of lysine‑4 of histone H3 (H3K4me2/3),
(CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain. stochastic variation, often without apparent biological for example, are associated with the stable expres-
3
Cancer Epigenetics purpose7–10. It is thought that stochastic changes are sion of developmental genes12. There is evidence that
Laboratory, Institute of
mediated both by extrinsic (environmental) factors and histone-methylation-dependent gene regulation can
Oncology of Asturias
(IUOPA-HUCA), University intrinsic factors, but their relative contributions remain be perturbed by external factors, but for most histone
of Oviedo, Spain. largely unknown (FIG. 1). modifications it is unclear whether they are epigenetic1
Correspondence to R.F. The possible impact of the environment on epige- and contribute to environmentally induced phenotypes.
e‑mail: robert.feil@igmm. netic regulation has attracted considerable interest. In Non-coding RNAs, including small RNAs, also contrib-
cnrs.fr
doi:10.1038/nrg3142
many studies, environmentally induced changes in gene ute to the regulation of the epigenome13, particularly at
Published online expression are associated with altered DNA methylation repeated DNA sequences. However, besides the involve-
4 January 2012 patterns or with altered histone modifications. From ment of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) in heat-stress
Epigenetic drift Intrinsic factors Arthropods. In aphids, the presence of predators, crowd-
ing or other external stresses induces a shift in the popu-
Environmental factors lation from wingless animals to winged animals. This
developmental switch occurs during the early stages
Somatic of development, through unknown mechanisms.
maintenance
Similarly, in Daphnia (water flea) species, external stress
(that is, water-borne chemical cues from predators) brings
about dramatic morphological changes during develop-
ment, and these persist over several generations in the
Altered chromatin function population19. Aphids and Daphnia spp. have orthologues
of vertebrate DNMTs, but it is unclear whether their pro-
?? Methylated CpG
nounced morphological transitions involve alterations in
Altered phenotype
Unmethylated CpG DNA methylation19. Substantial changes in DNA meth-
ylation are associated with an environmentally induced
Figure 1 | Factors that lead to epigenetic variation over time. Many
Nature epigenetic
Reviews | Genetics developmental transition in honey bees (Apis mellifora).
modifications become biologically stabilized at a particular stage of development, Female bees have two alternative forms, sterile workers
and are maintained subsequently throughout the lifetime of the organism (shown by and fertile queens, which develop from genetically identi-
the solid black arrow). However, at certain genomic loci, epigenetic marks can readily cal larvae through receiving different foods. Only larvae
change over time (shown by the discontinuous black arrow)7,9,10,120,121. This ‘epigenetic that are fed ‘royal jelly’ develop into queens. Through
drift’ is thought to depend both on environmental and intrinsic factors. This diagram yet-unknown mechanisms this brings about differ-
shows an example of how epigenetic drift can lead to the loss of DNA methylation, with
ential DNA methylation and the differential expres-
consequences for gene expression and cellular and organismal phenotypes.
sion of many genes between queen and worker larvae,
through the action of the de novo methyltransferase
DNMT3 (REFS 20,21).
responses in plants14,15, it remains largely unknown In mealybugs, which are Pseudococcidae, and a few
whether small RNAs could be linked to environmental other groups of insects, sex determination is triggered
effects as well. by environmental factors, probably through temperature
The theme of ‘environment and epigenetics’ evokes changes during gametogenesis22,23. Though genetically
excitement because environmentally triggered pheno- identical, male and female mealybugs are morphologi-
types are found to be associated with DNA methylation cally highly divergent. Remarkably, the induction of male
. and chromatin alterations. So far, however, few studies sex identity during early development involves the for-
Intrinsic factors
have provided clear mechanistic insights. Particularly in mation of stable heterochromatin and the silencing of the
Factors that are inherent to mammals, it remains often unknown whether there are entire paternally inherited genome, which brings about
the individual animal or plant. substantial epigenetic changes and whether these actu- dosage changes at crucial genes22. Whether temperature-
Genetically determined, ally contribute to the environmentally induced pheno- dependent sex-determination in other groups of animals
intrinsic factors induce
types16. Here we consider our current knowledge, from — including reptiles (such as turtles and crocodiles) and
considerable stochastic
variation, such as different different animal and plant species, of the effects that are fish species — is also mediated through changes in chro-
behaviour between cells. brought about by diet, temperature changes, chemical matin and DNA methylation, remains to be explored24.
pollutants and other external stresses. This Review does
CpG dinucleotides not cover epigenetic effects that are induced by socio- Plants. Epigenetic transitions can arise in individual
Indicates a cytosine followed
(5′–3′) by a guanine. Cytosines
economic aspects of the environment; this is a fascinat- plants through environmental signals (BOX 1) , par-
at CpG dinucleotides constitute ing topic that is discussed elsewhere17,18. Our discussion ticularly as a consequence of persistent temperature
the principal target of DNA is structured according to addressing key questions: changes25. A striking example is vernalization (FIG. 2A),
methylation in mammals. In which are the developmental and metabolic phenotypes a natural process through which plants in temperate
plants, cytosine methylation
that are brought about by specific environmental cues; climates become instructed to flower early after hav-
occurs also in other sequence
contexts. what do we know about the mechanistic links between ing been exposed to the cold temperatures of winter 26.
the environmental trigger and the observed epigenetic Another classic example of phenotypic plasticity in plants
Heterochromatin alterations; are some individuals more susceptible to spe- is in Linaria vulgaris (yellow toadflax), for which flower
A densely packaged, cific environmental stresses than others; and finally, how symmetry can be heritably bilateral or radial. The change
transcriptionally silenced type
of chromatin. Constitutive
should data from experimental models be extrapolated, from one to the other flower type occurs occasionally,
heterochromatin is found close and what could be the implications for human health? and involves alterations in DNA methylation at a gene
to centromeres in all tissues. encoding a transcription factor, without apparent genetic
Facultative heterochromatin, Long-term effects on development mutations27. Also, studies on plant populations in the
such as that commonly found
The environment can have long-lasting phenotypic wild have identified differential phenotypes that are
at gene promoters, can
be developmentally effects without apparent underlying genetic change. associated with specific DNA methylation profiles; these
reprogrammed. Striking examples are provided by natural phenomena, presumably emerge through selection28–33.
including developmental and reproductive transitions
Phenotypic plasticity that are brought about by environmental cues. Studying Mammals. Animal models have shown that nutrition and
The ability of a genotype to
yield different phenotypes;
such processes may help to pinpoint the mechanisms environmental exposures during development can lead
for example, in response to that underlie aberrant, pathological effects that are to locus-specific changes in the epigenome34. Possibly
environmental stimuli. brought about by the environment. the best-studied model is the agouti viable yellow (Avy)
Pol II
FLC ATF2
HMTs
Represses ? Pol II
flowering White White
Winter
(Prolonged cold)
This chromatin configuration This chromatin configuration
will give rise to white eye cells will give rise to red eye cells
Ab Establishment of repressive chromatin
Permissive to
flowering
Somatic maintenance of active chromatin
◀ Figure 2 | Environmentally induced epigenetic phenotypes in plants and animals. no significant effects on DNA methylation38. Recently,
A | Vernalization in plants. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) gene Waterland and colleagues40 identified various genes for
encodes a transcription factor that functions as a repressor of flowering. Before which methylation levels varied considerably between
vernalization, the active chromatin mark of histone H3 trimethylated on lysine‑4 individuals, even within pairs of monozygotic twins. To
(H3K4me3; shown by green circles) is linked to FLC expression (Aa). Winter temperatures
test whether peri-conceptional nutritional states could
initially induce the transcription of COOLAIR antisense transcripts90. Subsequently, there
is recruitment of different Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) components including
affect these putative metastable epialleles, the authors
VERNALIZATION 2 (VRN2) and the PHD finger proteins VRN5 and VERNALIZATION studied peripheral blood leukocytes in children from
INSENSITIVE 3 (VIN3; expression of which is cold-induced140), and of protein arginine rural Gambia that were conceived during either the dry
N‑methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5; also known as SKB1) (Ab). This brings about repressive season or the rainy season. The rainy season is nutri-
chromatin, which is characterized by H3K27me3, H3K9me3 and H4 arginine‑3 tionally challenging and children conceived during this
symmetrical dimethylation (H4R3me2s). After the winter period the repressive chromatin season showed slightly increased CpG methylation at
is maintained, thus preventing FLC expression and allowing early flowering of the some of the loci. The genes that were found to be affected
growing plant (Ac). B | Agouti viable yellow (Avy) mice. The Avy allele originated through in the Dutch hunger winter cohorts were not altered in
retrotransposition of an intracisternal A‑particle (IAP) upstream of the canonical the Gambia study, indicating that different nutritional
wild-type transcription start site (shown by grey right-angled arrows) of the agouti
challenges have different epigenetic outcomes.
gene141. These mice are heterozygous for the Avy allele, and the other allele (a) produces
no functional agouti protein. Alternative transcription (shown by black right-angled
arrows) of the Avy allele starts from a cryptic promoter at the IAP element, and is inhibited Postnatal effects. Environmental conditions can affect
by methylation of surrounding CpG dinucleotides142. IAP methylation is established in the epigenome postnatally as well. Studies in monozy-
the early embryo, and is somatically maintained throughout subsequent development gotic twins revealed epigenetic changes that could, at
(central panels). Aberrant (high) Avy expression leads to the agouti (yellow) phenotype; least in part, be environmentally induced9. Data obtained
unperturbed (low) expression results in the pseudo-agouti (brown) phenotype; and in a recent longitudinal study in young monozygotic
intermediate expression states produce a large variety of variegated phenotypes. twins demonstrate that locus-specific inter-individual
Because Avy expression depends on the methylation status of the IAP, the coat colour of DNA methylation differences arise, in part, after birth10.
Avy mice ultimately depends on this epigenetic trait. Maternal diet supplementation with One epidemiological study identified a possible
folate and other compounds that affect the methionine cycle leads to IAP methylation
link between particulate air pollution and global DNA
and Avy repression in the offspring, which are consequently pseudo-agouti95 (right panel).
Maternal exposure to endocrine disruptors or toxic compounds can induce the
methylation in blood cells54. Global methylation was
overexpression of Avy through hypomethylation of IAP (left panel)96,97,99. As a result, the also altered in the blood of individuals that had been
offspring exhibit the agouti (yellow) phenotype. In the published studies, the mothers exposed to the carcinogen benzene55. A possibly con-
were generally pseudo-agouti or mottled. C | Eye colour changes in Drosophila founding factor is that environmental stress can alter the
melanogaster. Red eye colour in D. melanogaster depends on the expression of the relative abundance of different cell types in the blood.
White gene. Translocation of White next to pericentric heterochromatin (the speak Such shifts could lead to altered levels of measured DNA
white-mottled‑4 mutation) leads to a mosaic pattern of expression of White, and thus a methylation for specific genes. In addition, DNA meth-
variegated (white or red) eye colour. In white cells, the stress-responsive transcription ylation itself is associated with cell fate determination
factor ATF2 mediates White repression. This process could be mediated by the in haematopoiesis, and its perturbation could affect the
recruitment of histone methyltransferases (HMTs) that establish repressive H3K9me2
cell populations that constitute peripheral blood11,56.
marks91 (Ca). Heat shock or osmotic stress during early larval development lead to
p38‑dependent ATF2 phosphorylation, release of ATF2 from the White promoter, and
To avoid such confounding effects, ideally other cell
subsequent gene activation91 (Cb). The resulting active chromatin state is somatically lineages and tissues should be explored as well, if
maintained and adult flies display completely red eyes. Pol II, RNA polymerase II. experimental design allows one to do so.
Epidemiological studies on skin and other tissues
identified locus-specific DNA methylation changes
supplementation52,53 during gestation are associated with associated with various environmental factors, includ-
small alterations in DNA methylation at imprinted genes ing chronic exposure to sunlight, asbestos and tobacco
and at putative metastable epialleles in the peripheral smoke, consumption of alcohol and use of hair-dye57–59.
blood of the offspring. The peri-conceptional period The relationship between tobacco smoke and altered
and early embryonic stages of development seem par- DNA methylation seems particularly relevant given that
ticularly sensitive. Studies on the Dutch hunger win- several tumour suppressor genes show increased pro-
CpG islands ter, at the end of the Second World War, indicate that moter methylation in healthy lung cells of smokers and
GC‑rich DNA sequences (of famine exposure in the peri-conceptional period led to of former smokers60. Conversely, the coagulation factor II
200–2,000 bp in length) that adverse metabolic and mental phenotypes in the next receptor-like 3 (F2RL3) gene locus is hypomethylated
have a high density of CpG
dinucleotides. Approximately
generation. Initial studies reported a minor, but signifi- in the peripheral blood of smokers61. It remains to be
half of the mammalian genes cant, decrease in DNA methylation at a differentially determined whether these aberrant methylation pat-
have a CpG island near the methylated region (DMR) in the imprinted insulin-like terns are involved in lung carcinogenesis. In these and
transcription start site, often growth factor 2 (IGF2) gene38. Further research39 iden- similar studies (TABLE 1), it is also unknown whether the
with promoter activity.
tified persistent, small alterations in DNA methylation observed epigenetic changes are directly mediated by
Vitamin B12 at other imprinted genes such as insulin (INS), guanine the toxic compound under study. Because not all tissues
(Cobalamin). A vitamin that is nucleotide binding protein a-stimulating (GNAS) and of an adult organism are equally exposed to chemical
abundant in meat, seafood, maternally expressed gene 3 (MEG3). Importantly, such pollutants, and because sensitivity depends on the tissue
eggs and dairy foods. It is a alterations were also found at some loci that are involved type, epigenetic alterations in adults are probably tissue-
fundamental cofactor in the
regeneration of methionine
in growth and metabolic disease, such as interleukin 10 specific in nature. This would be interesting to explore
from homocysteine, and in (IL10), leptin (LEP) and ATP-binding cassette A1 further, particularly because most human studies so far
other biochemical reactions. (ABCA1). Famine exposure later during gestation had have only considered peripheral blood.
Table 1 | Chemicals and pollutants that affect health and induce epigenetic alterations
Compound Species Ontogenic Epigenetic alteration Tissues or cell Phenotypic alterations Refs
stage types affected
Tobacco smoke Human Adult life Locus-specific DNA Lung, blood Lung cancer? 60,61,143
methylation and histone
modifications; chromatin
remodelling machinery
Particulate air pollution Human, Adult life DNA methylation Blood, sperm Unknown 54,69
Mouse
Asbestos Human Adult life DNA methylation Pleural tissues Susceptibility to different 57
diseases
Bisphenol A (BPA) Mouse Embryonic Locus-specific DNA Systemic Coat colour distribution of 99
development methylation agouti viable yellow (Avy) mice
Diethylstilbestrol (DES) Mouse Embryonic DNA methylation Gonads Male sexual function 144,145
development
Metal ions (such as Multiple Embryonic DNA methylation; Multiple tissues Increased susceptibility to Reviewed in
chromium, cadmiun, nickel, species development, histone modifications diseases such as cancer REFS 146,147
arsenic and methylmercury) adult life (for nickel)
Vinclozolin Mouse, Embryonic DNA methylation Male germ cells Altered gonad development 81,82
rat development and spermatogenesis in the
male offspring
Methoxychlor Mouse Embryonic DNA methylation Male germ cells Altered male reproductive 84
development, system
adult life
Silica Human Adult life DNA methylation Blood Silicosis 148
Benzene Human Adult life DNA methylation Blood Increased risk of AML 55
Di- and trichloroacetic acid, Mouse Adult life Locus-specific DNA Liver Increased risk of hepatic Reviewed in
trichloroethylene methylation cancer REF. 147
AML, acute myeloid leukaemia
Explanations for differences between gestational and It is unclear whether embryonic and adult cells in
postnatal effects. In animals, susceptibility to epigenetic plants also have differential susceptibility to environ-
alterations could be linked to the degree of pluripotency. mental cues. Most organs of plants retain a certain
Whereas the epigenomes of fully differentiated cells degree of pluripotency, and epigenetic patterns are
seem to be relatively stable, the epigenome of mouse possibly susceptible to change in many different cell
embryonic stem (ES) cells is particularly sensitive to types. Indeed, temperature and osmotic stress affect
in vitro culture conditions43,62–64. Also, culture of mam- the organization of heterochromatin and levels of DNA
malian pre-implantation embryos can readily affect the methylation at different loci in adult plants65. In vitro
establishment and maintenance of DNA methylation, culture of potato cell suspensions (derived from tuber
particularly at imprinted genes43,64. Similarly, assisted cortex) was shown to alter DNA methylation and acety-
reproduction in humans involves in vitro embryo cul- lation on histones H3 and H4 (REF. 66). Given the con-
ture, and is associated with an increased occurrence siderable developmental plasticity in plants, it should be
of imprinting-related epigenetic diseases42. Epigenetic interesting to explore the extent to which the epigenetic
instability at imprinted loci has not been reported in (and genetic) effects of stress contribute to adaptation
cultured differentiated cells. in subsequent generations14.
In mammals, early embryonic cells show high
expression levels of various regulators of DNA meth- Transgenerational inheritance
ylation and chromatin modifications, including the There is substantial interest in whether environmen-
de novo DNA methyltransferases, DNMT3A and tally induced epigenetic alterations can be inherited
DNMT3B. The abundance of these regulatory machin- from one generation to the next 36. During gametogen-
eries in early embryos, stem cells and germ cells is a esis, the epigenome is globally reprogrammed in mam-
possible reason for the susceptibility of these pluripo- mals4 and to a certain degree in plants as well33,67,68. The
tent cell types to environmental signals. In numerous remodelling processes make gonadal cells particularly
adult cell types, many of the chromatin regulators are vulnerable to extrinsic factors, even in exposed adults69,
less active, and epigenetic marks have become stabi- and may explain why apparent transgenerational effects
lized (FIG. 3). In addition, stem cell differentiation itself are observed. However, true epigenetic transgenera-
entails stepwise chromatin transitions, so it is possible tional inheritance implies that the maternal or pater-
that the epigenome could be more readily perturbed by nal animal or plant already had the epigenetic change
external cues during these transitions than in the fully and transmitted the change to its offspring, whose cells
differentiated state. were not exposed. In mammals, only epigenetic marks
metabolic and epigenetic effects of dietary conditions, of the folate metabolic cycle (FIG. 4A). SNPs in MTHFR
and whether these metabolic sensor proteins indeed give rise to less-active protein variants; these affect DNA
mediate stable chromatin alterations. methylation levels and susceptibility to nutritional and
environmental cues127. Studies on pairs of monozygotic
Genetic predisposition to environmental effects twins have shown that some twin couples present more
Genetic differences between individuals can influence epigenetic differences than others9,10,128–130. Besides the
epigenetic regulation. For example, many autosomal differences in environmental exposure between the two
mammalian genes show different levels of DNA methyl- individuals in a pair, one explanation could be genetic
ation between males and females39,111,112. Similarly, nutri- variation between different pairs of twins at genes that
tional effects on DNA methylation at specific autosomal code for chromatin-modifying enzymes and other key
genes can be strikingly different between males and proteins8. In the design of human environmental studies,
females39,48. Studies on mice have also revealed marked genetic susceptibility to epigenetic change needs to be
differences in epigenetic responses to environmental fac- taken into account.
tors between different inbred genotypes34. Furthermore,
dizygotic twins show more epigenetic differences than Conclusions
monozygotic twins113,114. In plants, it is likely that genetic Environmental factors can have long-lasting effects on
differences between ecotypes influence susceptibility gene expression and chromatin. Despite considerable
and adaptation to environmental effects71. progress during recent years, many questions remain.
Apart from natural processes, including vernalization, it
DNA sequence effects. The extent to which DNA remains largely unknown how the environment triggers
sequence determines the levels of epigenetic modifica- alterations in the epigenome. Unravelling the underlying
tions at specific loci is unclear. Studies on human blood molecular mechanisms will be a daunting task, but it is
cells show that SNPs can affect the level of methylation important to understand whether the observed methyla-
of nearby CpG dinucleotides115–119. In humans, at least tion and chromatin alterations are directly or indirectly
10% of common SNPs reside in regions that have a pro- linked to the toxic, dietary or ambient factors that are
pensity for local DNA methylation differences between being studied. Cell-based approaches could be instruc-
different alleles116. tive tools for such mechanistic studies, as was shown for
Studies on ageing indicate that epigenetic varia- HDAC inhibitors101.
tion over time preferentially occurs at specific loci120,121. Another key issue concerns the biological relevance
Certain loci are more susceptible than others, but the of the observed epigenetic alterations. In many animal
reasons for this remain poorly understood. However, and human studies, only minor changes at specific loci
based on various studies it seems that CpG-rich regions were detected, and it is unknown whether there could
tend to gain DNA methylation over time, whereas CpG- be broader epigenetic effects as well. Exploration of why
poor sequences tend to lose methylation7,57. Furthermore, specific loci are affected requires the identification and
sequences that are prone to acquiring DNA hypermeth- characterization of the factors that recruit chromatin-
ylation during ageing are often enriched in ‘bivalent modifying enzymes to these loci. Because transcription
chromatin’120,121. DNA methylation in some sequence con- and non-coding RNAs can be involved in the recruit-
texts, including the CpG islands that control imprinted ment of epigenetic modifiers to specific loci13, there is the
gene expression, is particularly stable during ageing 38,122; intriguing possibility that the perturbation of transcrip-
this could be linked to particular chromatin configura- tion could give rise to altered epigenetic patterns. Whether
tions at these loci, which have similarities to pericentric such a process contributes, for example, to the locus-
heterochromatin123. The resilience of some sequences to specific changes that arise following exposure to endo-
changes over time could be linked to the mechanisms crine disruptors is unknown, but would be interesting
that maintain DNA methylation at these loci. to explore.
Many protein complexes are involved in the regula- To conclude that the epigenome is altered because of
tion of DNA methylation and histone modifications in the environmental factors themselves is not straightfor-
plants and mammals2. Histone modifications, and pos- ward. Developmental and pathological phenotypes may
Butyrate sibly also DNA methylation124, are controlled by the bal- readily change the relative contribution of cell popula-
A short-chain carboxylic acid ance between activities that either establish or remove tions in a tissue, and thus alter the measured levels of
that is produced by bacteria
in the gut as an end product
the marks. Levels of specific proteins may vary between epigenetic modifications at specific loci. In the case of
of the fermentation of individuals and also between individual cells, and this systemic epigenetic alterations, one way to overcome
dietary carbohydrates. could shift the balance. Mouse studies have shown that this hurdle is to analyse different tissues and cells; this
artificially modified levels of Dnmt1 expression give approach has been taken in several recent studies40,114,120.
Sirtuins
rise to altered levels of DNA methylation at specific As discussed above, genetic variation also needs to be
A family of proteins that couple
lysine deacetylation to NAD+. gene loci125,126. Although this has not been studied sys- considered. Studies in model organisms have the dis-
tematically, smaller, naturally occurring variations in tinct advantage that inbred animals are often available.
Bivalent chromatin Dnmt1 expression might also affect DNA methylation However, in some inbred mouse lines, environmental
Regions of chromatin that have levels and may influence responses to the environment. cues have stronger effects than in others34. Also, intrin-
co-occurrence of histone H3
trimethylated on lysine‑27
Variations in other proteins are also likely to affect epige- sic epigenetic drift could depend on genetic factors and
(H3K27me3) and H3K4me2/3 netic responses. A classic example concerns 5,10‑methyl could give more variable outcomes in some genetic
during embryonic development. enetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), which is part backgrounds than in others131.
Research will be boosted by the expanding use of It seems too early to apply epigenetic alterations
next-generation DNA sequencing technologies132. that are induced by diet and chemical compounds
Applications include chromatin immunoprecipitation as biomarkers in public health and medicine. Unlike
followed by DNA sequencing (ChIP–seq) — to assess in cancer 134, environmentally induced DNA meth-
the genomic distribution of histone modifications, ylation changes often are small, and variable among
histone variants and nuclear proteins — and global exposed individuals. In the coming years, genome-wide
DNA methylation analysis through the sequencing of approaches will further define the loci that are suscep-
bisulphite-converted genomic DNA. Combined with tible to environmental insults and could yield impor-
appropriate statistical and bioinformatic tools133, these tant results for common diseases, such as obesity and
methods will permit the identification of all the loci that diabetes, that are influenced by dietary conditions37.
are epigenetically altered. It remains difficult to system- Combinations of loci that are susceptible to environ-
atically assess the epigenetic statuses of repeat sequences mentally induced epigenetic changes could be explored
in the genome, including retrotransposons, as repeat in cohorts of exposed populations. Recent epidemio-
sequences are often excluded from bioinformatic analy- logical studies in humans have identified lasting effects
ses. In plants and mammals, DNA methylation at repeat of nutritional intake on metabolism and development,
sequences is regulated through specific mechanisms2 often with associations to specific diseases. If epigenetic
and could be particularly susceptible to certain extrin- changes can be validated in large-scale human studies,
sic factors. Genome sequences of many wild animal they could be used to monitor the effects of diet and
and plant species are rapidly becoming available. For other extrinsic factors over time, possibly even across
example, the aphid and Daphnia pulex genomes were generations. There is still a long way to go, but the com-
sequenced recently 19, opening the door for epigenomic ing years will undoubtedly provide further insights
exploration of the environmentally induced phenotypes into the involvement of epigenetics in environmentally
in these arthropods. triggered phenotypes and diseases.
1. Henikoff, S. & Shilatifard, A. Histone modification: 18. Hackman, D. A., Farah, M. J. & Meaney, M. J. 32. Verhoeven, K. J., Jansen, J. J., van Dijk, P. J. & Biere, A.
cause or cog? Trends Genet. 27, 389–396 (2011). Socioeconomic status and the brain: Stress-induced DNA methylation changes and their
2. Law, J. A. & Jacobsen, S. E. Establishing, maintaining mechanistic insights from human and animal heritability in asexual dandelions. New Phytol. 185,
and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants research. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 11, 651–659 1108–1118 (2010).
and animals. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 204–220 (2010). (2010). Using genetically identical plants as experimental
3. Russo, V. E. A., Martienssen, R. A. & Riggs, A. D. 19. Simon, J. C., Pfrender, M. E., Tollrian, R., Tagu, D. & models, this study identified generalized
Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Regulation, Colbourne, J. K. Genomics of environmentally induced stress-associated epigenetic changes and showed
(Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, phenotypes in 2 extremely plastic arthropods. that they are frequently transmitted to the next
1996). J. Hered. 102, 512–525 (2011). generation.
4. Kota, S. K. & Feil, R. Epigenetic transitions in germ cell 20. Kucharski, R., Maleszka, J., Foret, S. & Maleszka, R. 33. Paszkowski, J. & Grossniklaus, U. Selected aspects
development and meiosis. Dev. Cell 19, 675–686 Nutritional control of reproductive status in of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance and
(2010). honeybees via DNA methylation. Science 319, resetting in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14,
5. Okano, M., Bell, D. W., Haber, D. A. & Li, E. 1827–1830 (2008). 195–203 (2011).
DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are This study provides evidence that the nutrition- 34. Rosenfeld, C. S. Animal models to study
essential for de novo methylation and mammalian dependent phenotype determination in honey environmental epigenetics. Biol. Reprod. 82,
development. Cell 99, 247–257 (1999). bees is highly dependent on DNA methylation. 473–488 (2010).
6. Reik, W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene 21. Lyko, F. et al. The honey bee epigenomes: differential 35. Rakyan, V. K., Blewitt, M. E., Druker, R., Preis, J. I. &
regulation in mammalian development. Nature 447, methylation of brain DNA in queens and workers. Whitelaw, E. Metastable epialleles in mammals.
425–432 (2007). PLoS Biol. 8, e1000506 (2010). Trends Genet. 18, 348–351 (2002).
7. Bjornsson, H. T. et al. Intra-individual change over 22. Khosla, S., Mendiratta, G. & Brahmachari, V. 36. Daxinger, L. & Whitelaw, E. Transgenerational
time in DNA methylation with familial clustering. Genomic imprinting in the mealybugs. Cytogenet. epigenetic inheritance: more questions than answers.
JAMA 299, 2877–2883 (2008). Genome Res. 113, 41–52 (2006). Genome Res. 20, 1623–1628 (2010).
8. Fraga, M. F. Genetic and epigenetic regulation of 23. Sanchez, L. Sciara as an experimental model for 37. Gluckman, P. D., Hanson, M. A., Buklijas, T., Low, F. M.
aging. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 21, 446–453 (2009). studies on the evolutionary relationships between & Beedle, A. S. Epigenetic mechanisms that underpin
9. Fraga, M. F. et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the zygotic, maternal and environmental primary metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Nature Rev.
the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. signals for sexual development. J. Genet. 89, Endocrinol. 5, 401–408 (2009).
USA 102, 10604–10609 (2005). 325–331 (2010). 38. Heijmans, B. T. et al. Persistent epigenetic differences
10. Wong, C. C. et al. A longitudinal study of epigenetic 24. Marshall Graves, J. A. Weird animal genomes and the associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans.
variation in twins. Epigenetics 5, 516–526 (2010). evolution of vertebrate sex and sex chromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17046–17049 (2008).
11. Borgel, J. et al. Targets and dynamics of promoter Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 565–586 (2008). 39. Tobi, E. W. et al. DNA methylation differences after
DNA methylation during early mouse development. 25. Chinnusamy, V. & Zhu, J. K. Epigenetic regulation of exposure to prenatal famine are common and timing-
Nature Genet. 42, 1093–1100 (2010). stress responses in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, and sex-specific. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 4046–4053
12. Zhou, V. W., Goren, A. & Bernstein, B. E. Charting 133–139 (2009). (2009).
histone modifications and the functional organization 26. Kim, D. H., Doyle, M. R., Sung, S. & Amasino, R. M. 40. Waterland, R. A. et al. Season of conception in rural
of mammalian genomes. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 7–18 Vernalization: winter and the timing of flowering gambia affects DNA methylation at putative human
(2011). in plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25, 277–299 metastable epialleles. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001252
13. Pauli, A., Rinn, J. L. & Schier, A. F. Non-coding RNAs (2009). (2010).
as regulators of embryogenesis. Nature Rev. Genet. 27. Cubas, P., Vincent, C. & Coen, E. An epigenetic This study identifies for the first time putative
12, 136–149 (2011). mutation responsible for natural variation in floral metastable epialleles in humans, and shows how
14. Ito, H. et al. An siRNA pathway prevents symmetry. Nature 401, 157–161 (1999). their methylation status is influenced by nutritional
transgenerational retrotransposition in plants 28. Herrera, C. M. & Bazaga, P. Epigenetic differentiation conditions during gestation.
subjected to stress. Nature 472, 115–119 (2011). and relationship to adaptive genetic divergence in 41. Ferguson-Smith, A. C. Genomic imprinting: the
This study explores the role of the siRNA pathway discrete populations of the violet Viola cazorlensis. emergence of an epigenetic paradigm. Nature Rev.
in preventing the transgenerational genetic effects New Phytol. 187, 867–876 (2010). Genet. 12, 565–575 (2011).
of stress-induced alterations in plants. 29. Paun, O. et al. Stable epigenetic effects impact 42. Hirasawa, R. & Feil, R. Genomic imprinting and
15. Mirouze, M. & Paszkowski, J. Epigenetic contribution adaptation in allopolyploid orchids (Dactylorhiza: human disease. Essays Biochem. 48, 187–200
to stress adaptation in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. Orchidaceae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 2465–2473 (2010).
14, 267–274 (2011). (2010). 43. Khosla, S., Dean, W., Brown, D., Reik, W. & Feil, R.
16. Jirtle, R. L. & Skinner, M. K. Environmental epigenomics 30. Lira-Medeiros, C. F. et al. Epigenetic variation in Culture of preimplantation mouse embryos affects
and disease susceptibility. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, mangrove plants occurring in contrasting natural fetal development and the expression of imprinted
253–262 (2007). environment. PLoS ONE 5, e10326 (2010). genes. Biol. Reprod. 64, 918–926 (2001).
17. Borrelli, E., Nestler, E. J., Allis, C. D. & Sassone-Corsi, P. 31. Martin, A. et al. A transposon-induced epigenetic 44. Waterland, R. A. & Jirtle, R. L. Transposable elements:
Decoding the epigenetic language of neuronal change leads to sex determination in melon. Nature targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene
plasticity. Neuron 60, 961–974 (2008). 461, 1135–1138 (2009). regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 5293–5300 (2003).
45. Sandovici, I. et al. Maternal diet and aging alter the 66. Law, R. D. & Suttle, J. C. Chromatin remodeling in 91. Seong, K. H., Li, D., Shimizu, H., Nakamura, R. &
epigenetic control of a promoter-enhancer interaction plant cell culture: patterns of DNA methylation and Ishii, S. Inheritance of stress-induced, ATF‑2‑dependent
at the Hnf4a gene in rat pancreatic islets. Proc. Natl histone H3 and H4 acetylation vary during growth of epigenetic change. Cell 145, 1049–1061 (2011).
Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5449–5454 (2011). asynchronous potato cell suspensions. Plant Physiol. This study describes an epigenetic, environmentally
46. Aagaard-Tillery, K. M. et al. Developmental origins of Biochem. 43, 527–534 (2005). triggered phenotype in fruit flies that can be
disease and determinants of chromatin structure: 67. Jullien, P. E. & Berger, F. DNA methylation transgenerationally transmitted.
maternal diet modifies the primate fetal epigenome. reprogramming during plant sexual reproduction? 92. Cavalli, G. & Paro, R. The Drosophila Fab‑7
J. Mol. Endocrinol. 41, 91–102 (2008). Trends Genet. 26, 394–399 (2010). chromosomal element conveys epigenetic inheritance
47. Gallou-Kabani, C. et al. Sex- and diet-specific changes 68. Teixeira, F. K. & Colot, V. Repeat elements and the during mitosis and meiosis. Cell 93, 505–518 (1998).
of imprinted gene expression and DNA methylation in Arabidopsis DNA methylation landscape. Heredity 93. Chandler, V. L. Paramutation’s properties and puzzles.
mouse placenta under a high-fat diet. PLoS ONE 5, 105, 14–23 (2010). Science 330, 628–629 (2010).
e14398 (2010). 69. Yauk, C. et al. Germ-line mutations, DNA damage, 94. Jia, S., Noma, K. & Grewal, S. I. RNAi-independent
48. Sinclair, K. D. et al. DNA methylation, insulin and global hypermethylation in mice exposed to heterochromatin nucleation by the stress-activated
resistance, and blood pressure in offspring particulate air pollution in an urban/industrial location. ATF/CREB family proteins. Science 304, 1971–1976
determined by maternal periconceptional B vitamin Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 605–610 (2008). (2004).
and methionine status. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 70. Johannes, F. et al. Assessing the impact of 95. Wolff, G. L., Kodell, R. L., Moore, S. R. & Cooney, C. A.
104, 19351–19356 (2007). transgenerational epigenetic variation on complex Maternal epigenetics and methyl supplements affect
This broad study reports epigenetic and traits. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000530 (2009). agouti gene expression in Avy/a mice. FASEB J. 12,
physiological alterations in the offspring of sheep 71. Richards, E. J. Natural epigenetic variation in plant 949–957 (1998).
that were fed diets poor in compounds that are species: a view from the field. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 96. Kaminen-Ahola, N. et al. Maternal ethanol consumption
involved in methyl-donor pathways. 14, 204–209 (2011). alters the epigenotype and the phenotype of offspring
49. Lillycrop, K. A., Phillips, E. S., Jackson, A. A., 72. Manning, K. et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic in a mouse model. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000811 (2010).
Hanson, M. A. & Burdge, G. C. Dietary protein mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription 97. Dolinoy, D. C., Weidman, J. R., Waterland, R. A. &
restriction of pregnant rats induces and folic acid factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nature Genet. 38, Jirtle, R. L. Maternal genistein alters coat color and
supplementation prevents epigenetic modification of 948–952 (2006). protects Avy mouse offspring from obesity by
hepatic gene expression in the offspring. J. Nutr. 135, 73. Saze, H. & Kakutani, T. Heritable epigenetic mutation modifying the fetal epigenome. Environ. Health
1382–1386 (2005). of a transposon-flanked Arabidopsis gene due to lack Perspect. 114, 567–572 (2006).
50. Carone, B. R. et al. Paternally induced transgenerational of the chromatin-remodeling factor DDM1. EMBO J. 98. Ross, S. A. & Milner, J. A. Epigenetic modulation and
environmental reprogramming of metabolic gene 26, 3641–3652 (2007). cancer: effect of metabolic syndrome? Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
expression in mammals. Cell 143, 1084–1096 (2010). 74. Teixeira, F. K. et al. A role for RNAi in the selective 86, s872–s877 (2007).
51. Hales, C. N. & Barker, D. J. The thrifty phenotype correction of DNA methylation defects. Science 323, 99. Dolinoy, D. C., Huang, D. & Jirtle, R. L. Maternal
hypothesis. Br. Med. Bull. 60, 5–20 (2001). 1600–1604 (2009). nutrient supplementation counteracts bisphenol
52. Hoyo, C. et al. Methylation variation at IGF2 75. Sasaki, H. & Matsui, Y. Epigenetic events in A‑induced DNA hypomethylation in early development.
differentially methylated regions and maternal folic mammalian germ-cell development: reprogramming Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13056–13061 (2007).
acid use before and during pregnancy. Epigenetics 6, and beyond. Nature Rev. Genet. 9, 129–140 (2008). This work shows that nutritional interventions
928–936 (2011). 76. Schmitz, R. J. et al. Transgenerational epigenetic during gestation can counteract some deleterious
53. Steegers-Theunissen, R. P. et al. Periconceptional instability is a source of novel methylation variants. epigenetic effects that are induced by specific
maternal folic acid use of 400 microg per day is Science 334, 369–373 (2011). endocrine disruptors during embryonic development.
related to increased methylation of the IGF2 gene in 77. Ingouff, M. et al. Zygotic resetting of the HISTONE 3 100. Weinhouse, C. et al. An expression microarray approach
the very young child. PLoS ONE 4, e7845 (2009). variant repertoire participates in epigenetic for the identification of metastable epialleles in the
54. Baccarelli, A. et al. Rapid DNA methylation changes reprogramming in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 20, mouse genome. Epigenetics 6, 1105–1113 (2011).
after exposure to traffic particles. Am. J. Respir. Crit. 2137–2143 (2010). 101. Dashwood, R. H. & Ho, E. Dietary histone deacetylase
Care Med. 179, 572–578 (2009). 78. Lane, N. et al. Resistance of IAPs to methylation inhibitors: from cells to mice to man. Semin. Cancer
55. Bollati, V. et al. Changes in DNA methylation patterns reprogramming may provide a mechanism for Biol. 17, 363–369 (2007).
in subjects exposed to low-dose benzene. Cancer Res. epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Genesis 35, 102. Zhou, W. et al. Requirement of RIZ1 for cancer
67, 876–880 (2007). 88–93 (2003). prevention by methyl-balanced diet. PLoS ONE 3,
56. Calvanese, V. et al. A promoter DNA demethylation 79. Morgan, H. D., Sutherland, H. G., Martin, D. I. & e3390 (2008).
landscape of human hematopoietic differentiation. Whitelaw, E. Epigenetic inheritance at the agouti locus 103. Imai, S., Armstrong, C. M., Kaeberlein, M. &
Nucleic Acids Res. 12 Sep 2011 (doi:10.1093/nar/ in the mouse. Nature Genet. 23, 314–318 (1999). Guarente, L. Transcriptional silencing and longevity
gkr685). 80. Blewitt, M. E., Vickaryous, N. K., Paldi, A., Koseki, H. protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone
57. Christensen, B. C. et al. Aging and environmental & Whitelaw, E. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA deacetylase. Nature 403, 795–800 (2000).
exposures alter tissue-specific DNA methylation methylation at an epigenetically sensitive allele in 104. Vaquero, A. et al. Human SirT1 interacts with histone
dependent upon CpG island context. PLoS Genet. 5, mice. PLoS Genet. 2, e49 (2006). H1 and promotes formation of facultative
e1000602 (2009). 81. Anway, M. D., Cupp, A. S., Uzumcu, M. & Skinner, M. K. heterochromatin. Mol. Cell 16, 93–105 (2004).
58. Langevin, S. M. et al. The influence of aging, Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine 105. Peng, L. et al. SIRT1 Deacetylates the DNA
environmental exposures and local sequence features disruptors and male fertility. Science 308, methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) protein and alters its
on the variation of DNA methylation in blood. 1466–1469 (2005). activities. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 4720–4734 (2011).
Epigenetics 6, 908–919 (2011). 82. Stouder, C. & Paoloni-Giacobino, A. Transgenerational 106. Vaquero, A. & Reinberg, D. Calorie restriction and the
59. Grönniger, E. et al. Aging and chronic sun exposure effects of the endocrine disruptor vinclozolin on the exercise of chromatin. Genes Dev. 23, 1849–1869
cause distinct epigenetic changes in human skin. methylation pattern of imprinted genes in the mouse (2009).
PLoS Genet. 6, e1000971 (2010). sperm. Reproduction 139, 373–379 (2010). 107. Bosch-Presegue, L. et al. Stabilization of Suv39H1 by
This epidemiological study explored the epigenetic 83. Guerrero-Bosagna, C., Settles, M., Lucker, B. & SirT1 is part of oxidative stress response and ensures
effects of sun exposure on the skin and compared Skinner, M. K. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of genome protection. Mol. Cell 42, 210–223 (2011).
these observed differences with those that arose vinclozolin on promoter regions of the sperm 108. Rodgers, J. T. et al. Nutrient control of glucose
on ageing. epigenome. PLoS ONE 5, e13100 (2010). homeostasis through a complex of PGC‑1α and SIRT1.
60. Belinsky, S. A. et al. Aberrant promoter methylation in 84. Stouder, C. & Paoloni-Giacobino, A. Nature 434, 113–118 (2005).
bronchial epithelium and sputum from current and Specific transgenerational imprinting effects of the 109. Beher, D. et al. Resveratrol is not a direct activator of
former smokers. Cancer Res. 62, 2370–2377 (2002). endocrine disruptor methoxychlor on male gametes. SIRT1 enzyme activity. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 74,
This study established for the first time the Reproduction 141, 207–216 (2011). 619–624 (2009).
association between smoking and aberrant 85. Brykczynska, U. et al. Repressive and active histone 110. Kaeberlein, M. et al. Substrate-specific activation
hypermethylation of tumour suppressor genes in methylation mark distinct promoters in human and of sirtuins by resveratrol. J. Biol. Chem. 280,
non-transformed lung cells. mouse spermatozoa. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 17038–17045 (2005).
61. Breitling, L. P., Yang, R., Korn, B., Burwinkel, B. & 679–687 (2010). 111. El-Maarri, O. et al. Gender specific differences in levels
Brenner, H. Tobacco‑smoking‑related differential 86. Hammoud, S. S. et al. Distinctive chromatin in human of DNA methylation at selected loci from human total
DNA methylation: 27K discovery and replication. sperm packages genes for embryo development. blood: a tendency toward higher methylation levels in
Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 450–457 (2011). Nature 460, 473–478 (2009). males. Hum. Genet. 122, 505–514 (2007).
62. Dean, W. et al. Altered imprinted gene methylation 87. Greer, E. L. et al. Transgenerational epigenetic 112. Waxman, D. J. & O’Connor, C. Growth hormone
and expression in completely ES cell-derived mouse inheritance of longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. regulation of sex-dependent liver gene expression.
fetuses: association with aberrant phenotypes. Nature 479, 365–371 (2011). Mol. Endocrinol. 20, 2613–2629 (2006).
Development 125, 2273–2282 (1998). 88. Kumar, S. V. & Wigge, P. A. H2A.Z-containing 113. Kaminsky, Z. A. et al. DNA methylation profiles in
63. Doherty, A. S., Mann, M. R., Tremblay, K. D., nucleosomes mediate the thermosensory response in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Nature Genet. 41,
Bartolomei, M. S. & Schultz, R. M. Differential effects Arabidopsis. Cell 140, 136–147 (2010). 240–245 (2009).
of culture on imprinted H19 expression in the 89. De Lucia, F., Crevillen, P., Jones, A. M., Greb, T. & 114. Ollikainen, M. et al. DNA methylation analysis of
preimplantation mouse embryo. Biol. Reprod. 62, Dean, C. A PHD-polycomb repressive complex 2 multiple tissues from newborn twins reveals both
1526–1535 (2000). triggers the epigenetic silencing of FLC during genetic and intrauterine components to variation in
64. Young, L. E. et al. Epigenetic change in IGF2R is vernalization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, the human neonatal epigenome. Hum. Mol. Genet.
associated with fetal overgrowth after sheep embryo 16831–16836 (2008). 19, 4176–4188 (2010).
culture. Nature Genet. 27, 153–154 (2001). 90. Swiezewski, S., Liu, F., Magusin, A. & Dean, C. 115. Gertz, J. et al. Analysis of DNA methylation in a three-
65. Pecinka, A. et al. Epigenetic regulation of repetitive Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts generation family reveals widespread genetic influence
elements is attenuated by prolonged heat stress in of an Arabidopsis Polycomb target. Nature 462, on epigenetic regulation. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002228
Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22, 3118–3129 (2010). 799–802 (2009). (2011).
116. Hellman, A. & Chess, A. Extensive sequence-influenced 129. Javierre, B. M. et al. Changes in the pattern of DNA 142. Michaud, E. J. et al. Differential expression of a new
DNA methylation polymorphism in the human methylation associate with twin discordance in dominant agouti allele Aiapy is correlated with
genome. Epigenetics Chromatin 3, 11 (2010). systemic lupus erythematosus. Genome Res. 20, methylation state and is influenced by parental
117. Kerkel, K. et al. Genomic surveys by methylation- 170–179 (2010). lineage. Genes Dev. 8, 1463–1472 (1994).
sensitive SNP analysis identify sequence-dependent 130. Schneider, E. et al. Spatial, temporal and 143. Hussain, M. et al. Tobacco smoke induces polycomb-
allele-specific DNA methylation. Nature Genet. 40, interindividual epigenetic variation of functionally mediated repression of Dickkopf‑1 in lung cancer cells.
904–908 (2008). important DNA methylation patterns. Nucleic Acids Cancer Res. 69, 3570–3578 (2009).
118. Murrell, A. et al. An association between variants in Res. 38, 3880–3890 (2010). 144. Sato, K. et al. Neonatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol
the IGF2 gene and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: 131. McLaren, A. Too late for the midwife toad: stress, alters expression of DNA methyltransferases and
interaction between genotype and epigenotype. variability and Hsp90. Trends Genet. 15, 169–171 methylation of genomic DNA in the mouse uterus.
Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 247–255 (2004). (1999). Endocr. J. 56, 131–139 (2009).
119. Schilling, E., El Chartouni, C. & Rehli, M. Allele-specific 132. Park, P. J. ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges 145. Volle, D. H. et al. The orphan nuclear receptor small
DNA methylation in mouse strains is mainly of a maturing technology. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, heterodimer partner mediates male infertility induced
determined by cis-acting sequences. Genome Res. 19, 669–680 (2009). by diethylstilbestrol in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 119,
2028–2035 (2009). 133. Pepke, S., Wold, B. & Mortazavi, A. Computation for 3752–3764 (2009).
120. Rakyan, V. K. et al. Human aging-associated DNA ChIP-seq and RNA-seq studies. Nature Methods 6, 146. Calvanese, V., Lara, E., Kahn, A. & Fraga, M. F.
hypermethylation occurs preferentially at bivalent S22–S32 (2009). The role of epigenetics in aging and age-related
chromatin domains. Genome Res. 20, 434–439 134. Baylin, S. B. & Jones, P. A. A decade of exploring the diseases. Ageing Res. Rev. 8, 268–276 (2009).
(2010). cancer epigenome — biological and translational 147. Baccarelli, A. & Bollati, V. Epigenetics and environmental
121. Teschendorff, A. E. et al. Age-dependent DNA implications. Nature Rev. Cancer 11, 726–734 chemicals. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 21, 243–251 (2009).
methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells (2011). 148. Umemura, S. et al. Aberrant promoter
is a hallmark of cancer. Genome Res. 20, 440–446 135. Marfil, C. F., Camadro, E. L. & Masuelli, R. W. hypermethylation in serum DNA from patients with
(2010). Phenotypic instability and epigenetic variability in a silicosis. Carcinogenesis 29, 1845–1849 (2008).
122. Heijmans, B. T., Kremer, D., Tobi, E. W., Boomsma, D. I. diploid potato of hybrid origin, Solanum ruiz-lealii.
& Slagboom, P. E. Heritable rather than age-related BMC Plant Biol. 9, 21 (2009). Acknowledgements
environmental and stochastic factors dominate 136. Ravelli, G. P., Stein, Z. A. & Susser, M. W. We thank F. Berger, M. Constância, the reviewers and all mem-
variation in DNA methylation of the human IGF2/H19 Obesity in young men after famine exposure bers of our teams for helpful comments and discussions. We
locus. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16, 547–554 (2007). in utero and early infancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 295, apologize to our colleagues whose research we were unable to
123. Henckel, A. et al. Histone methylation is 349–353 (1976). review owing to the focus on selected model systems, and
mechanistically linked to DNA methylation at This is one of the first reports in humans showing because of space limitations. M.F.F. is grant supported by the
imprinting control regions in mammals. Hum. Mol. the possible long-term effects of prenatal and Spanish Ministry of Health (PS09/02454) and the ‘Obra
Genet. 18, 3375–3383 (2009). early-life nutrition on adult health and disease. Social Cajastur’. R.F. acknowledges grant funding from the
124. Feng, S., Jacobsen, S. E. & Reik, W. Epigenetic 137. Dunger, D. B. et al. Association of the INS VNTR with ‘Institut National du Cancer’, the ‘Ligue Contre le Cancer’,
reprogramming in plant and animal development. size at birth. Nature Genet. 19, 98–100 (1998). the ‘Agence Nationale de la Recherche’ and the UK Agency for
Science 330, 622–627 (2010). 138. Baccarelli, A. et al. Neonatal thyroid function in International Cancer Research. He is affiliated to the European
125. Biniszkiewicz, D. et al. Dnmt1 overexpression causes Seveso 25 years after maternal exposure to dioxin. network EpiGeneSys.
genomic hypermethylation, loss of imprinting, and PLoS Med. 5, e161 (2008).
embryonic lethality. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 2124–2135 139. Bhargava, S. K. et al. Relation of serial changes in Competing interests statement
(2002). childhood body-mass index to impaired glucose The authors declare no competing financial interests.
126. Weaver, J. R. et al. Domain-specific response of tolerance in young adulthood. N. Engl. J. Med. 350,
imprinted genes to reduced DNMT1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 865–875 (2004).
30, 3916–3928 (2010). 140. Sung, S. & Amasino, R. M. Vernalization in FURTHER INFORMATION
127. Marini, N. J. et al. The prevalence of folate-remedial Arabidopsis thaliana is mediated by the PHD finger Robert Feil’s departmental homepage:
MTHFR enzyme variants in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. protein VIN3. Nature 427, 159–164 (2004). http://www.igmm.cnrs.fr
Sci. USA 105, 8055–8060 (2008). 141. Yen, T. T., Gill, A. M., Frigeri, L. G., Barsh, G. S. & Mario F. Fraga’s departmental homepages:
128. Baranzini, S. E. et al. Genome, epigenome and RNA Wolff, G. L. Obesity, diabetes, and neoplasia in yellow http://www.cnb.uam.es and http://www.unioviedo.es/IUOPA
sequences of monozygotic twins discordant for Avy/- mice: ectopic expression of the agouti gene. ALL LINKS ARE ACTIVE IN THE ONLINE PDF
multiple sclerosis. Nature 464, 1351–1356 (2010). FASEB J. 8, 479–488 (1994).