Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

DARK MATTER, DARK ENERGY – DARK SIDE OF THE UNIVERSE

TTC VIDEO NOTES, Sean Carroll, Ph.D.

PAGE 1 OF 2

01 BUILDING BLOCKS OF THE UNIVERSE

Ingredients of which the universe us made

Dark Matter and Dark Energy – something that haven’t


been detected directly; but we have evidence for
believing them.

Understanding of Dark Matter and Dark Energy – from


observation to interpretation using the concept of
Newton’s gravity.

It’s possible that the inferences used – from observation


to the existence of dark matter and dark energy – have
gone wrong along the way; not a mistake in gathering
observational data but rather in the interpretation of
observational data; our understanding of gravity may be
wrong.

We know – universe is about 14 billion years old.

We believe – that 95% of the universe is a dark sector


(we are not absolutely sure because there are some
interesting alternatives but that is the theory that fits the
data by far the best).

We speculate – what is dark matter, dark energy? What


are they made of? Where do they come from? Why do
they have the amounts that they do? We’ll be making
hypotheses and figure out which of those is true – but
we don’t know yet.

A question since ancient times – what is the universe


fundamentally made of? Elementary constituent of
matter – Earth, Air, Water and Fire in ancient times;
Democritus untl 19th century – atom; Nowadays –
elementary particles.
NOTES FROM TTC – DARK MATTER, DARK ENERGY – DARK SIDE OF THE UNIVERSE PAGE 2 OF 2

theory of general relativity allows the space in between


the objects to grow.

Milky Way – huge collection of stars.

Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite picture of


a milky way.

Can we divide quarks – we don’t know but most believed


that they can’t – electrons and quarks are part of the
This was taken inside the Milky Way.
bottom layer of which ordinary matter is constructed.
Some 100 years ago
Up quarks, down quarks and electrons – you can make
1) it was the common understanding that the Milky
everything you’ve ever seen.
Way is all there is in the universe. “Island Universe”
We know the quarks are there because of experiments idea.
made using particle accelerators. 2) Nebulae – fuzzy little patches on a telescope or on
a photographic plate; they don’t look like stars
What are the heavier particles that we haven’t
discovered? – Problem: It takes more energy to make
heavier particles – There’s a financial limit.

What other ways are there to discover new particles?


Influence of gravity on other celestial objects. These
objects create gravitational fields and if we can detect
these gravitational fields, then it provides as a clue to the
secrets on the dark side of the universe. For example, if
the moon couldn’t be seen, we could detect its presence
through the tides here on earth. The moon’s gravitational
field influences the tides here on earth.

02 SMOOTH, EXPANDING UNIVERSE ORION NEBULA (taken today)

The universe looks the same everywhere. Orion Nebula - A star forming region. A huge cloud of
Balloon analogy of an expanding universe – the idea gas that is collapsing under its mutual gravitational force
works if we think of the dots separating “only” and think and it will splinter off eventually to form individual stars.
that there’s no such thing as inside or outside of the It’s right here in the Milky Way.
balloon.

Universe expanding – it’s not getting bigger into some


pre-existing space. It means that the individual objects
inside the universe are getting farther apart. – Einstein’s
NOTES FROM TTC – DARK MATTER, DARK ENERGY – DARK SIDE OF THE UNIVERSE PAGE 3 OF 2

noticed that these variable stars, given their periods,


were much dimmer than the Cepheid variable stars in
our galaxy. He worked out how far they were and
discovered that Andromeda was a galaxy all by itself,
comparable in size to the Milky Way.

1 – THE UNIVERSE IS BIG - conclusion


2 – ITS GETTING BIGGER – also discovered by
Hubble.
ANDROMEDA NEBULA Vesto Slipher (1875 – 1969) – first to observe that
galaxies were redshifted, meaning, they are moving
100 Years ago, this looks like a fuzzy little patch. The away from us.
truth is that this is actually the Andromeda Galaxy.
Hubble compared the distances to galaxies that he had
We live in a universe that is filled with Galaxies. measured to the redshift that Slipher had measured and
found that the farther away a galaxy is, the faster it is
Edwin Hubble – first figured this out. Looked at things moving away from us.
that looked like nebulae and resolved them into
individual stars; suggested that they are not clouds of The space in between all the galaxies are expanding.
gases but a collection of individual stars all by
themselves.

Edwin Hubble – measured the distance of Andromeda


Galaxy from earth….using the technique of “standard
candles”

IDEA: Imagine a candle flame a certain distance away


from you with a certain brightness. At twice the distance,
it would be 1/4th dimmer. This is the inverse square law.

The problem is if you don’t know how bright it was to


begin with, you can’t figure out how far away it is.

Problem in astrophysics a hundred years ago and still


today is to find “standard candles” and measure their
distances.

Build a COSMIC DISTANCE LADDER using standard


candles.

Standard candle for Hubble – CEPHEID VARIABLE


STARS. A type of star that pulsates. The standard
candleness is not absolute. Cepheid variables are not all
exactly the same brightness. They also don’t have the
same period of oscillation.

1908 – Henrietta Levitt – discovered that there is a


relationship between how bright a Cepheid variable is A more modern version of the plot.
and its period of pulsation.
Very strong evidence that the universe is expanding.
Hubble discovered Cepheid variable stars in the Does not mean that we are at the center.
Andromeda Galaxy as well as in other galaxies. He
NOTES FROM TTC – DARK MATTER, DARK ENERGY – DARK SIDE OF THE UNIVERSE PAGE 4 OF 2

HUBBLE’S EQUATION The very structure of space and time themselves are dynamic;
space-time has a geometry and a curvature, and it’s that
v = Hd curvature that we interpret as gravity.

Time is like space. The rate at which time flows depends on


H = Hubble’s constant; Hubble parameter
what you do. Like measuring distance that varies depending
on the path taken to measure distances.
In the past, the universe was expanding much more
quickly. H was a bigger number in the early universe. The amount of time that one measures is not a fact of the
universe. It’s personal. It’s a fact of what you do. It could be
Measuring H was difficult. different for two observers – even if they start and end at the
same point.
Wendy Freedman measured it at: 72 km/sec/Mpc
When a clock moves around, it measures a different amount
A parsec is about 3.26 light-years of time than when a clock stands still. This becomes more
obvious if one moves at a speed of light.
Knowing these data, it becomes easier to map out the If everything responds to gravity in the same way, then gravity
universe. is not a force at all. Gravity is a feature of space-time itself – it
is the curvature of space-time. Space-time has a geometry.

A plot of where galaxies are in the universe created by


the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Each dot in the photo
represents individual galaxies.
If all the numbers would be zero, the geometry would be flat.
We live at the center of this picture; pic is a northern and
a southern hemisphere survey. Right hand side – energy and momentum of the stuff in the
universe.
1) The universe is basically the same everywhere.
Any stuff existing creates a gravitational field.
2) It’s not exactly the same.
Space-time is dynamical…it can change.
The expansion of the universe depends on what is inside
(topic of next lecture). Apparent velocity vs actual velocity of galaxies.
Hubble never said that the universe was expanding. He only It’s not that the galaxies are actually moving. It’s the space
said that distant galaxies are moving at a velocity proportional between galaxies that is growing; it’s stretching; it’s getting
to their distances. Never won the Nobel Prize. bigger; more space is coming into existence.

Where did space and time come from? This question doesn’t
03 SPACE, TIME AND GRAVITY make sense for Newton. But with relativity, this question
becomes relevant…but we don’t know yet the answer; but our
Special Relativity- 1905 – Einstein – a replacement for understanding of dark matter and energy will be part of the
Newton’s notion of space and time. clues that helps us answer the question eventually.
Einstein tried to incorporate gravity into his theory of special
relativity and realized that they are incompatible. He
eventually throws away special relativity and replaces it with 04 COSMOLOGY IN EINSTEIN’S UNIVERSE
something better - General Relativity
NOTES FROM TTC – DARK MATTER, DARK ENERGY – DARK SIDE OF THE UNIVERSE PAGE 5 OF 2

Redshifting observed from distant galaxies is not actually a


Doppler shift; space is actually expanding in between.

How big is the universe? We don’t know how big the universe
is or whether the question makes sense.

What we know is that we don’t see any boundary to the


universe.

Because space-time in Einstein’s universe is dynamical, we


could imagine different kinds of shape.

We don’t have any direct evidence that the universe is finite in One of the surprising results of cosmology in the last ten years
size. (Does not mean that it’s not finite in size). is that today, the expansion rate of the universe is going up.

We only see a finite part of whatever universe there is. For The earth is bound together by the gravitational field of all the
two reasons: stuff in the earth, likewise for the sun, likewise for the galaxies.
The Milky Way galaxy is bound together by the mutual
1) The universe has a finite age. The time between gravitational force of all the 100 billion stars in it.
now and the big bang is very fairly well determined
The first crucial thing about the expansion of the universe is
to be about 14 billion years. Data is telling us that that bound systems do not expand. For example, the distance
it’s about 13.7 billion years. between two galaxies is getting bigger but the galaxies
2) Light travels at a finite speed. Light has only themselves are not getting bigger.
traveled a finite distance from the now until the big
bang. Even if the universe were infinite, we couldn’t The bound systems do not get stretched along with the
see all of it. We could only see a certain patch, the universe.
patch from which light can get into us in less than 14
This is a subtle thing that people are initially reluctant to
billion years. believe but it really is true. It’s the only way that you could
make sense of the claim that the universe is expanding. If
We do not know the actual size of the universe but we could everything in the universe, including people and atoms,
determine its relative size; for example, how many years expanded along with space, that would exactly be the same
would it take for the distance (to the galaxies) to grow by 10%, as if nothing is expanding.
by half, etc.
When we say that space is expanding, what we mean is, the
Cosmologists invented the SCALE FACTOR OF THE number of atoms that it would take to stretch from you to a
UNIVERSE – is a number which we set by convention equal distant galaxy is getting bigger. That’s because the atoms are
to 1 today. So, if the scale factor is ½, this means that all the fixed and the galaxies are moving away.
galaxies in the universe were half their current distance.
But while the universe is expanding, even though particles or
What we need to understand is what the scale factor is doing atoms do not stretch along with it, they become more dilute.
as a function of time. More and more space is coming into existence.

Things are diluting away as the universe expands.

Matter is anything that gets their energy from their mass.

E = mc2 means that the REST ENERGY of an object, the


energy it has when it’s not moving is mass times the square of
the speed of light. That’s the minimum amount of energy that
something could possibly have. It’s a constant.

This means that the energy per particle is not changing if the
particle is moving slowly compared to the speed of light.
The rate of expansion in the past is bigger than it is now.
NOTES FROM TTC – DARK MATTER, DARK ENERGY – DARK SIDE OF THE UNIVERSE PAGE 6 OF 2

As opposed to matter, we have radiation, photons, etc., other


particles that are moving at the speed of light.

If you’re moving at the speed of light, your MASS IS ZERO.


Your energy is not coming from e=mc2 but rather it comes
from the frequency at which you’re vibrating. But that
frequency is changing as the universe expands. Because of
this redshift. The cosmological redshift takes short wavelength
high energy photons and stretches them into long
wavelengths low energy photons.

For particles that are moving less than the speed of light,
energy is constant.

For particles moving at a speed of light, the energy per


particle decreases as the universe expands. Particles
traveling at the speed of light / radiation lose their energy as
they become older in the history of the universe.

To a cosmologist, that’s the difference between matter and


radiation. How the energy density changes.

The number density of particles is just how many particles per


cubic centimeter so the energy density is how much energy
per cubic centimeter, In a region that grows along with the
universe, the number density is constant – we’re not creating
new particles. But in a fixed cubic centimeter of space, the
energy density will go down. The number density goes down,
particles become more dilute and therefore the energy density
goes down.

Difference between matter and radiation – the energy density


in radiation goes down more quickly. In radiation, not only do
the particles dilute away, but every particle loses energy.

The total energy in all universe in radiation goes down more


quickly than the total energy in matter. As the universe gets
older and older, matter will eventually win. There will be more
energy density in matter than in radiation.

Contrarywise, in the past, the energy density of matter is less


important than the energy density of radiation. In the past
when all the protons are squeezed together, it’s the photons
that were winning. In the past, the universe was radiation
dominated.

16:07

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen