Sie sind auf Seite 1von 40

1

FOREWORD

First of all, let us praise to Allah SWT because we won't be able to complete this paper
without Allah SWT blessings. And we wish to take this opportunity to express our deep and
sincere gratitude to Mr. Ardy Maulidy Navastara, S.T., M.T. and Mr. Dr. Ing. Ir. Haryo
Sulistyarso as our lecturer of Land Use Management Class in ITS (Sepuluh Nopember Institute
of Technology) who has guidance us in the process of formulating this paper which entitled
"Rungkut District Land Use Development Analysis and Planning". We also want to thank to
everybody who helped us to finish this paper properly.
This paper is also a process of learning tools in analyzing land use and also planning in
Rungkut District, East Surabaya. We expected this paper can be useful both for the writer in the
creation process and for the reader as knowledge. We also hope this paper can
be consider as a discourse in urban and regional planning.
After making a great efforts, we finally completed our research paper. However, we
realize that there are still many shortcomings in this paper. Therefore we enthusiastically
welcome the objective criticism and constructive suggestion for the improvement of this paper.
Thank you.

Surabaya, November 2018

Authors

2
TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 3
CHAPTER I .................................................................................................................................... 5
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 5
1.1 Background Issue ............................................................................................................. 5
1.2 The Aims of The Paper .................................................................................................... 5
1.3 Benefits............................................................................................................................. 5
1.4 Writing Format ................................................................................................................. 6
CHAPTER II................................................................................................................................... 7
LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................... 7
2.1 Policy on National Regional Spatial Planning (National RTRW – Peraturan Pemerintah
RI No. 26 Tahun 2008) .................................................................................................... 7
2.2 Surabaya City Based on East Java Province Spatial Planning (RTRW Propinsi –
Peraturan Daerah No. 5 Tahun 2012) .............................................................................. 8
2.3 Surabaya City Spatial Planning (RTRW Surabaya – Peraturan Daerah No. 12 Tahun
2014) ................................................................................................................................ 8
2.4 Rungkut District in The Constellation of The Space Structure and Pattern RDTR UP. I
Rungkut .......................................................................................................................... 11
2.5 Land Capability Analysis ............................................................................................... 12
2.6 Land Suitability Analysis ............................................................................................... 17
2.7 Carrying Capacity Analysis ........................................................................................... 18
CHAPTER III ............................................................................................................................... 20
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA......................................................................... 20
3.1 Regional Delineation ...................................................................................................... 20
3.2 Geology and Soil Type ................................................................................................... 22
3.3 Hidrology ....................................................................................................................... 22
3.4 Climatology .................................................................................................................... 22
CHAPTER IV ............................................................................................................................... 24
ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................... 24

3
4.1 Land Capability Analysis ............................................................................................... 24
4.2 Land Suitability Analysis ............................................................................................... 29
4.3 Land Requirements Analysis ......................................................................................... 29
4.4 Land-Use Analysis ......................................................................................................... 34
CHAPTER V ................................................................................................................................ 39
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ............................................................................ 39
BIBLIOGRAPGHY ...................................................................................................................... 40

4
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background Issue


According to Jayadinata (1999), land is land that has already been buried and is
generally owned and utilized by the state or institutions to be cultivated. Land is a place for
economic activities that involve many parties who have their own interests. Land use is an
important element in urban planning. Its existence is the basis for urban planning.
Land use guides regional development that aims to grow and develop land benefits. It
can be seen that regional development must involve changes in the current state of the land.
Changes in the state of land can be related to the replacement of forms or systems of land
use, for example agriculture is converted into settlements, or food agriculture is replaced with
plantations. Changes to land conditions can also be related to reclamation to make land
conditions in accordance with the planned land use requirements, for example drying out
swamps to become industrial estates.
Therefore, it is necessary to identify an area to determine the level of capability and
suitability of a region in the future, which in the end the development is intended to fulfill all
kinds of needs, both facilities and infrastructure and supporting facilities that can be fulfilled
so that the developer has a very great for improving people's lives in an area.

1.2 The Aims of The Paper


The purposes of writing this report are:
1. Identify the land use in Rungkut District
2. Identify problems and potential in the area of Rungkut District
3. Analyze and explain the data that has been compiled

1.3 Benefits
The benefits of writing this report are:
1. Application of knowledge obtained from Land Use course in the analysis of land
2. Know the potentials and problems of land use in Rungkut District

5
1.4 Writing Format
The format of “Rungkut District Land Use Development Analysis and Planning” are:
1. Chapter I contains background issue, the aims of the paper, benefits and writing
format.
2. Chapter II contains of literature review that we got from the existing laws and policies
3. Chapter III contains of regional delineation, geology and soil type, hydrology, and
climatology of Rungkut District.
4. Chapter IV contains of land capability analysis, land suitability analysis, land
requirements analysis, and land use analysis.
5. Chapter V contains of conclusion and recommendation.

6
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Policy on National Regional Spatial Planning (National RTRW – Peraturan Pemerintah
RI No. 26 Tahun 2008)
In accordance with Undang-Undang No. 26 of 2007 concerning spatial planning,
spatial plans are formulated in stages starting from general into detailed levels. Since the
spatial plan is the spatial dimension of the regional development plan and part of national
development, the three levels (National RTRW, Provincial RTRW, and City/Regency
RTRW) have a related relationship which consistency needs to be maintained in its
substances and operationalization aspects.
The National RTRW is a strategy and policy on the use of state space which includes
national goals and directions for spatial use that pay attention to the inter-island and inter-
provincial linkages. The National RTRW is arranged at a level of accuracy of 1: 1,000,000
with a planning period of 20 years. The Provincial RTRW is a strategy and direction of
policy on the use of provincial area that focuses on the linkages between regions / districts /
cities, because the development of a region cannot be separated from other areas around it.
The Provincial RTRW is arranged at a level of accuracy of 1: 250,000 with a planning period
of 20 years. The spatial structure policy for Surabaya City that is related to the land use
aspect stated in the National Spatial Plan is:
“Establishing Surabaya City which is part of the Gerbangkertosusila metropolitan area to be
revitalized and developed in phase I”
The planned function of the Gerbangkertasusila Plus area is as an area of food crop
agriculture, plantations, horticulture, forestry, fisheries, livestock, mining, trade in
services, education, health, tourism, transportation, and industry. To facilitate the
implementation of the plan, the urban system in East Java is planned in accordance with the
size of the city mentioned in the order of urban cities. Surabaya as the largest city in East
Java is a first-order city, as a reference in determining the order of other urban cities in East
Java. Other cities are basically far below Surabaya, while the size of urban cities other than
Surabaya has a relatively balanced size. The city of Surabaya which functions as a service

7
center, its infrastructure development plan is directed at the realization of the construction of
the Suramadu Bridge.

2.2 Surabaya City Based on East Java Province Spatial Planning (RTRW Propinsi –
Peraturan Daerah No. 5 Tahun 2012)
Based on the East Java Provincial Regulation (Peraturan Daerah No. 5 of 2012)
concerning in Spatial Planning for East Java Province, East Java territory is divided into 9
Development Area Units. One of The Development Area Unit includes Surabaya as the
center of the Gerbangkertosusila Plus Planning Area Unit (SWP) with the core area in the
Surabaya Metropolitan Area. Related to the Rungkut District area planning which is in UP. I
Rungkut, the East Java RTRW policy can be viewed from the regional function plan as in
Surabaya's high-tech industrial area Industrial Estate Rungkut (SIER).

2.3 Surabaya City Spatial Planning (RTRW Surabaya – Peraturan Daerah No. 12 Tahun
2014)
In the East Java Province's territorial structure, the city of Surabaya was designated as
the main center of East Java, a first-order city. The trend that occurred was the development
of Surabaya as the main city far exceeding other cities in its sub-ordination. Progress that
occurred caused the city of Surabaya to focus on a more modern functions such as industry
and trade and services.
Rungkut District included in the UP. I Rungkut’s, development policy focuses in the
field of protection of nature, trade and services, and industry. Objectives relating to land use
in Rungkut District can be seen in the Surabaya City RTRW in the articles below;
1. Article 20 Clause (5)
“The functions of the main activities of the environment in UP. I Rungkut
includes settlements, education, trade and services, protection of nature and
industry.”

8
2. Article 41 Clause (1) and (2)
Concerning Regions that Provide Protection to their Subordinate Areas
(1) Regions that provide protection to their subordinate areas as referred to in
Article 40 letter a, cover urban forests scattered in UP. I Rungkut, UP. II
Kertajaya, UP. X Wiyung , UP. XI Tambak Osowilangun, and UP. XII
Sambikerep and utilization of reservoirs / boezem spread in UP. I Rungkut,
UP. V Tanjung Perak, UP. X Wiyung and UP. XII Sambikerep.
(2) Regional management efforts that provide protection for their subordinate
areas, including:
a. urban forest development integrated with urban agriculture (urban
farming);
b. development of green open spaces integrated with natural tourism
activities in the reservoir/boezem area; and
c. increase in land processing to improve soil capacity so that it has a higher
ability to absorb water.

3. Article 44 Clause (1)


Concerning Nature Conservation Areas and Cultural Preservation
(1) Nature and cultural preservation areas include:
a. The area of mangrove forest which was developed at the coastal border
in the north and east of the city and around the Suramadu bridge; and
b. Cultural heritage and science areas include buildings and / or cultural
heritage environments spread in UP. V Tanjung Perak, UP. VI
Tunjungandan and UP. VII Wonokromo.
(2) Efforts to manage mangrove forested areas as referred to in paragraph (1)
letter a are carried out by:
c. Make improvements and rehabilitation efforts in the form of replanting
mangroves in mangrove forested bay areas in the Mulyorejo, Sukolilo,
Rungkut and Gununganyar Districts with a width of at least 130 (one
hundred and thirty) times the average difference in annual highs and lows
measured from lowest low tide line to land.

9
4. Article 49 Clause (4) and (5)
Concerning Housing and Settlement Area
(4) Development of low density housing and settlements is directed at Pakal,
Benowo, Sambikerep, Lakarsantri, Gunung Anyar, Rungkut, Sukolilo, and
Mulyorejo Districts.
(5) The development of residential areas and settlements is done by:
a. developing high, medium and low density residential and residential areas
carried out proportionally;
b. improve the quality of housing and settlements that already exist;
c. improving the quality of villages in an integrated manner both physically
and socio-economically through improving the environment, providing
housing infrastructure and facilities, rejuvenating and improving housing
and settlement areas;
d. developing vertical housing and settlements that are carried out in an
integrated manner with the surrounding environment in new residential
and residential areas, densely populated areas and urban service centers;
e. developing new housing and settlements equipped with the provision of
infrastructure, facilities and public utilities in accordance with the criteria
set by the Regional Government; and
f. increasing the role of the community / developer to fulfill obligations in
the provision and / or delivery of infrastructure, facilities and public
utilities to the Regional Government.

5. Article 52 Clause (2)


Concerning Industrial Area
(2) The industrial area covers the Surabaya Industrial Estate Rungkut (SIER)
in the UP. I Rungkut.

6. Article 69 Clause (1)


(1) Strategic areas for high-tech Industrial / industrial estate in Rungkut
District are in UP. I Rungkut.

10
7. Article 70 Clause (1) and (2)
(1) Strategic areas for the goal of saving the environment include:
a. The East Coast region of Surabaya in the Gunung Anyar District,
Rungkut District, Sukolilo District and Mulyorejo District, which are in
the UP. I Rungkut and UP. II Kertajaya;
(2) Development and / or control of strategic area functions based on aspects of
the function and carrying capacity of the environment are carried out by:
a. develop and preserve coastal ecosystems in the east coast region as
protected areas and control the existence of built-up areas;
b. protect the area around Lamong River which functions as a river border;
and
c. protect the Surabaya Zoo area which functions as a flora and faunal
protected area and its ecosystem as one of the urban forests.

2.4 Rungkut District in The Constellation of The Space Structure and Pattern RDTR UP. I
Rungkut

The Surabaya City space is planned based on conditions and potential land use,
activity functions, regional development and growth centers and carried out evenly and
11
structured in the city area. The Surabaya Space Structure Plan is divided into 12 development
units (UP) which are based on the conditions, characteristics, and potential possessed in each
region.
The division of development units is based on the district administrative area with
functions and growth centers in each development unit where the planning area, namely
Rungkut District, is included in the UP. I Rungkut covers areas with the main functions in
accordance with Surabaya City RTRW Article 20 Paragraph 5 are settlements, education,
trade and services, protection of nature, and industry.

2.5 Land Capability Analysis


Land Capability Unit
The land capability unit is land classification carried out by the method of inhibiting
factors. With this method, each land quality or land characteristics are sorted from the best to
the worst or from the smallest one to the biggest one. Then the criteria table is compiled for
each class; the smallest resistor for the best class and sequentially the bigger the obstacle the
lower the class.
1. Land Capability Unit (SKL) Analysis – Morphology
The purpose of this analysis is to sort the landscape/morphology in the area and/or
planning area that are able to be developed in accordance with its function. The results of
Morphological SKL analysis are as follows.
Morphology
No. Slope Morphological Land Capability Score
Shape
1. Steep Hills > 45 % High morphological land capability 1
2. Medium Hills 25 – 45 % Adequate morphological land capability 2
3. Sloping Hills 15 – 25 % Medium morphological land capability 3
4. Bumpy Plain 2 – 15 % Less morphological land capability 4
5. Flatland 0–2% Low morphological land capability 5
A more complex morphology means the landscape is in the form of mountains,
hills and undulating land. As a result, development capabilities are low and difficult to
develop. If the morphology is less complex or low means the land is flatter and easy to
develop.

12
2. Land Capability Unit (SKL) Analysis – Feasibility
The Purpose of this analysis is to know the level of ease of land in an area to be
excavated / matured in the process of development. The results of the SKL analysis are as
follows.
Soil
No. Morphology Shape Slope Height Land Feasibility Score
Type
1. Steep Hills > 45 % 2500 – 3672 m Low Feasibility 1
2. Medium Hills 25 – 45 % 1500 – 2500 m Less Feasibility 2
3. Sloping Hills 15 – 25 % 500 – 1500 m Medium Feasibility 3
4. Bumpy Plain 2 – 15 % 100 – 500 m Adequate Feasibility 4
5. Flatland 0–2% 0 – 100 m High Feasibility 5

3. Land Capability Unit (SKL) Analysis – Slope Stability


The purpose of this analysis is to know the level of slope stability in the
development area and the ability in receiving loads. The results of the Slope stability
analysis are as follows.
Morphology
No. Slope Height Soil Type Rain Fall
Shape
1. Steep Hills > 45 % 2500 – 3672 m > 3000 mm/tahun
2. Medium Hills 25 – 45 % 1500 – 2500 m Alluvial 2000 - 3000 mm/tahun
3. Sloping Hills 15 – 25 % 500 – 1500 m Grumosol 1000 - 2000 mm/tahun
4. Bumpy Plain 2 – 15 % 100 – 500 m
< 1000 mm/tahun
5. Flatland 0–2% 0 – 100 m
No. Ground Movement
Slop Stability Score
Vulnerability
1. Zone I (Very Vulnerable) Low 1
2. Zone II (Vulnerable) Less 2
3. Zone III (Rather Vulnerable) Medium 3
4. 4
Zone IV (Safe) High
5. 5

13
4. Land Capability Unit (SKL) Analysis – Foundation Stability
The purpose of this analysis is to know the land ability to support the weight in
urban development, as well as the types of foundations that are appropriate for each level.
Soil
No. Slope Stability Foundation Stability Score
Type
1. Low Slope Stability Low carrying capacity and foundation stability 1
2. Less Slope Stability Less carrying capacity and foundation stability 2
3. Medium Slope Stability 3
4. 4
High Slope Stability High carrying capacity and foundation stability
5. 5

5. Land Capability Unit (SKL) Analysis – Water Availability


The purpose of this analysis is to know the level of water availability and water
supply capability at each level, for regional development.
Soil Water
No. Morphology Shape Slope Rainfall Score
Type Availability
1. Steep Hills > 45 % Very Low 1
2. Medium Hills 25 – 45 % < 1000 mm/tahun Low 2
Sloping Hills 1000 – 2000
3. 15 – 25 % Medium 3
mm/tahun
Bumpy Plain 2000 – 3000
4. 2 – 15 % 4
mm/tahun High
5. Flatland 0–2% > 3000 mm/tahun 5

6. Land Capability Unit (SKL) Analysis – Drainage


The purpose of this analysis is to know the level of land capability to stream rain
water naturally, so that the possibility of puddle both locally and extensively can be
avoided.
Morphology Soil Drainage
No. Slope Height Rainfall Score
Shape Type Capability

14
Steep Hills 2500 – 3672
1. > 45 % 1
m
High
Medium Hills 1500 – 2500 < 1000 mm/tahun
2. 25 – 45 % 2
m
Sloping Hills 1000 – 2000 Adequate
3. 15 – 25 % 500 – 1500 m 3
mm/tahun
Bumpy Plain 2000 – 3000
4. 2 – 15 % 100 – 500 m 4
mm/tahun Low
5. Flatland 0–2% 0 – 100 m > 3000 mm/tahun 5

7. Land Capability Unit (SKL) Analysis – Against Erosion


The purpose of this analysis is to know which area that experience soil erosion, so
that the level of soil resistance to erosion can be identified and anticipation of its impact
on more downstream areas.
Morphology Soil Erision
No. Slope Rainfall Score
Shape Type Vulnerability
1. Steep Hills > 45 % > 3000 mm/tahun High 1
2. Medium Hills 25 – 45 % 2000 – 3000 mm/tahun Rather High 2
3. Sloping Hills 15 – 25 % 1000 – 2000 mm/tahun Medium 3
4. Bumpy Plain 2 – 15 % < 1000 mm/tahun Very Low 4
5. Flatland 0–2% - 5

8. Land Capability Unit (SKL) Analysis – Waste Disposal


The purpose of this analysis is to know which areas that are able to be occupied as
the final waste disposal and waste treatment, both solid and liquid.
Morphology Soil Waste Disposal
No. Slope Height Rainfall Score
Shape Type Capability
Steep Hills > 3000
1. > 45 % 2500 – 3672 m 1
mm/tahun Low
2. Medium 25 – 45 % 1500 – 2500 m 2000 – 3000 2

15
Hills mm/tahun
Sloping Hills 1000 – 2000 Medium
3. 15 – 25 % 500 – 1500 m 3
mm/tahun
Bumpy Plain < 1000
4. 2 – 15 % 100 – 500 m 4
mm/tahun Adequate
5. Flatland 0–2% 0 – 100 m 5

9. Land Capability Unit (SKL) Analysis – Natural Disaster


The purpose of this analysis is to know the level of land capability in facing
natural disasters, especially in terms of geology, to avoid or reduce losses from victims
due to disasters.
Morphology
No. Slope Height Soil Type Rain Fall
Shape
Steep Hills > 3000
1. > 45 % 2500 – 3672 m
mm/tahun
Medium Hills 2000 - 3000
2. 25 – 45 % 1500 – 2500 m
mm/tahun
Sloping Hills 1000 - 2000
3. 15 – 25 % 500 – 1500 m
mm/tahun
4. Bumpy Plain 2 – 15 % 100 – 500 m < 1000
5. Flatland 0–2% 0 – 100 m mm/tahun
Natural
Ground Movement
No. Flood Prone Volcano Prone Disaster Score
Vulnerability
Prone
1. Zone I (Very Vulnerable) Zone I (Very Zone I (Very
1
Vulnerable) Vulnerable)
High
2. Zone II (Vulnerable) Zone II Zone II
2
(Vulnerable) (Vulnerable)
3. Zone III (Rather Vulnerable) Zone III (Rather Zone III (Rather
Medium 3
Vulnerable) Vulnerable)

16
4. 4
Zone IV (Safe) Zone IV (Safe) Zone IV (Safe) Low
5. 5

2.6 Land Suitability Analysis


Land suitability is essentially a description of the level of suitability of a plot of land
for a particular use (Sitorus, 1985). Land suitability analysis is an assessment of landforms
for certain uses while still concerning environmental issues.
1. Land Suitability Analysis Method
a. Boolean Overlay
 Binary Method
 Only know 1 and 0 score
 It is said suitable when all variable that is discussed met the standards
b. Arithmetic Overlay
Uses the algorithm formula to find land suitability.
c. Weighted Overlay
 Weights each point according to the variable scoring
 Each variable has a different weight / percentage
 Suitability is seen from the total weight of each location
2. Land Suitability Analysis Procedure
3. Land Suitability Level (Class)
Class Level Terms
Land has almost no means for certain types of
S1 Suitable
use
Land has a moderate level of limitation due to a
S2 Medium Suitability
factor in environmental sustainability
Soil has a heavy barrier for certain uses
S3 Low Suitability
sustainably
Land needs special treatment or additional
Conditionally
S4 requirements for the feasibility of certain land
Suitable
uses

17
Land is considered to be unsuitable with certain
S5 Not Suitable uses or there are mutually nullifying
relationships

Parameter of Land Suitability according to Permen PU No. 20 / PRT / M / 2007:


1. Height
2. Slope
3. Type of soil
4. Rainfall
5. Vulnerability of soil movement
6. Flood-prone
7. Volcano prone

2.7 Carrying Capacity Analysis


1. Land Carrying Capacity Definition
Environmental carrying capacity is the ability of the environment to support the
life span of humans and other living things (In Undang-Undang No.23 Tahun 1997
concerning Environmental Management). Environmental carrying capacity is the ability
of the environment to support the lives of humans and other living beings (Regulation of
the Minister of Environment number 17 of 2009 concerning Guidelines for Determining
Environmental Supporting Capacity in Regional Spatial Planning).
In general, the carrying capacity of land is the maximum capacity of land to
supply the needs of humans or living things and life that is on it. A population that can be
supported is expected not to reduce the degree of natural environment and without
damaging the ecosystem. Land carrying capacity explains the dimensions of development
that can be accommodated without causing environmental damage or degradation.
The analysis of Land Carrying Capacity (Carrying capacity ratio) is a
development planning tool that provides a description of the relationship between
population, land use and the environment. Of all these, the carrying capacity analysis can
provide informations needed in assessing the level of land capability in supporting all

18
human activities in the region concerned. Analysis of land carrying capacity connects
environmental values with social values.
Information obtained from the results of the analysis of carrying capacity in
general will involve the problem of ability (carrying capacity) possessed by an area in
supporting the development process, by looking at a comparison between the amount of
land owned and the number of existing populations. Land productivity, composition of
land use, demand per capita, and price of agricultural products are all considered to
influence carrying capacity and are used as input parameters for the model.
2. Determination Basis of Land Carrying Capacity
Determination of land carrying capacity is done by knowing the capacity of the
natural environment and resources to support human activities / residents who use space
for living. The amount of capacity in a place is influenced by the conditions and
characteristics of the resources that are in the expanse of space in question.
According to the Regulation of the Minister of Environment No. 17 of 2009.
Guidelines for Determining Land Carrying Capacity in Regional Spatial Planning of the
State Minister of Environment, the carrying capacity of land is divided into 2 (two)
components, namely supportive capacity and capacity of waste (assimilative capacity). In
this guideline, the study of the carrying capacity of land is limited to the capacity to
supply natural resources, especially related to the ability of land and the availability and
needs of land and water in an area or region.
3. Land Needs Analysis
Analysis of land requirements is one of the functions of planning to project future
land needs based on the parameters of population growth and using SNI 03-1733-2004
for settlements and SNI 03-1733-2004 for public facilities. The rate of population growth
is the main consideration in the analysis of land requirements due to the possibility of
land control which will affect the proportion of land use and the level of land
requirements. Land Needs Analysis is based on the number of families needing the land
for various activities.

19
CHAPTER III
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA

3.1 Regional Delineation


Rungkut District is one of the geographical regions of Surabaya City which is part of
East Surabaya with an altitude of ± 4.6 meters above sea level. The district borders on
Sukolilo District in the north, Madura Strait in the east, Gunung Anyar District in the south,
and Tenggilis Mejoyo District in west side. Rungkut District has an area of ± 2,102 Ha
consisting of 6 sub-districts:
 Rungkut Kidul Subdistrict (± 137 ha)
 Medokan Ayu Subdistrict (± 723 ha)
 Wonorejo Subdistrict (± 648 ha)
 Penjaringan Sari Subdistrict (± 181 ha)
 Kedung Baruk Subdistrict (± 155 ha)
 Kali Rungkut Subdistrict (± 258 ha)
Rungkut District has one of the biggest industrial area in East Java, that is Surabaya
Industrial Estate Rungkut (SIER). Not only industrial area, but there’s also mangrove
ecotourism area in Wonorejo Subdistrict.
UP I Rungkut is a tertiary Development Unit (UP) in the development of the city of
Surabaya. The development of Rungkut District, based on Rencana Detail Tata Ruang
(RDTR) dan Peraturan Zonasi, is generally directed to support the development of the city of
Surabaya, where Rungkut acts as a residential, trade and service area in the city and
environment, education, industry, and preservation areas. Concentration at Rungkut District
generally occurs in the main corridors with the domination of trade and service, which are
MERR and Jl. Rungkut Madya. In its existing conditions, the development trend of trade and
service activities, both commercial and non-commercial, develops and spreads along the road
corridor. Likewise there is a tendency for the development of housing activities that occur
due to the transfer of empty land functions into the built-up area.

20
21
3.2 Geology and Soil Type
The geological conditions in the planning area are classified as alluvium land and
kabuh formation. The alluvium land has characteristics of crust, gravel, clay, and fragments
of fossil shells with locations covering the east coast to the coast. Whereas the kabuh
formation has characteristics of sand and gravel, dark gray, coarse grained, aquatic structure
and crisscrossing.
The type of soil that is mostly found in Rungkut District is alluvial hydromorph and
alluvial gray, this type of soil is a type of soil that can be found around coastal areas.
3.3 Hidrology
Water resources consist of surface water and spring water resources. Surface water
resources come from major watersheds. Whereas springs mean groundwater and the
production of aquifers.
a. Watershed (DAS)
The main river in the planning area based on the Surabaya Drainage
Master Plan (SDMP) study is in Wonorejo River. In accordance with the slope
conditions of the planning area bordering the sea on the east in general, the
direction of drainage network flow is flowing from west to east, and empties into
the sea.
b. Water springs
Groundwater and aquifer production in the city of Surabaya consist of two
types, including aquifers with flow through the granular space and small
productive aquifers (split or nesting). Based on the results of field research
conducted by SIPA holders and a list of groundwater collection charges by the
Surabaya City Revenue Service branch of the use of groundwater in the Surabaya
area, the planning area has rather brackish/slightly salty ground water with low
potential to brackish/salty groundwater especially in the eastern part of Rungkut.

3.4 Climatology
The climate characteristics of Rungkut Subdistrict are closer to Perak II Juanda
Meteorology and Geophysics Station which borders East Surabaya. Climatology data
according to Juanda Station are as follows:

22
 Maximum humidity reaches 98% which occurs in May, while minimum
humidity is 39% which occurs in September.
 Maximum air pressure is 1,013.6 mbs which occurred in January, and the
minimum pressure is 1,007.3 mbs which occurred in December.
 The maximum temperature is 35.20 C which occurs in January, and a
minimum temperature of 19.00 C that occurs in September.
 The highest rainfall reaches 532 mm for 15 rainy days, which occurred in
February. The lowest rainfall is 5 mm for 3 rainy days, which occurs in
September.

23
CHAPTER IV
ANALYSIS
4.1 Land Capability Analysis
Land capability is the ability of land to support a given land use without causing
damage. Land capability also can be interpreted as the charateristics of the land which
include type of soil, topography, drainage, and other physical environmental conditions to
support human activites on the land. The land capability analysis is an analysis to acquire a
description of the land capability level to be developed as an urban, as a reference for the
direction of land suitability in the next analysis phase.
According to Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum No. 20/PRT/M/2007, there are
some datas we need before get into Land Capability Analysis:
1. Land Capability Unit of Morphology
2. Land Capability Unit of Feasibility (Kemudahan Dikerjakan)
3. Land Capability Unit of Slope Stability (Kestabilan Lereng)
4. Land Capability Unit of Foundation Stability (Kestabilan Pondasi)
5. Land Capability Unit of Water Availability (Ketersediaan Air)
6. Land Capability Unit for Drainage
7. Land Capability Unit against Erosion
8. Land Capability Unit of Waste Disposal (Pembuangan Limbah)
9. Land Capability Unit against Natural Disasters
This analysis used overlay techniques based on physical and environmental data such
as morphology, elevation, slope, soil type, rainfall, land use, and disaster-prone levels. The
analysis results of Land Capability Unit in the study-area will be described in the following
table:
Land Capability Analysis
No. Characteristics Informations
Unit Results
1. Land Capability Morphology: Gentle slope Land Land capability
Unit of Morphology Slope: 0-2% capability of of morphology
morphology: is low. It means
low (Value: 5) that the study-
area is flat and

24
easy to be
developed as
housing or
commercials
area.
2. Land Capability Morphology: Gentle slope Feasibility: The
Unit of Feasibility Slope: 0-2% high (Value: development
Elevation: 0-100m 5) process is
Type of soil: Alluvial categorized as
easy, so that
development in
the study-area
can be done
easily.
3. Land Capability Morphology: Gentle slope Slope High slope
Unit of Slope Slope: 0-2% stability: high stability means
Stability Elevation: 0-100m (Value: 5) that the slope in
Type of soil: Alluvial study-area is
gentle (small
potential of
landslides), so it
is safe to be
developed as a
built area.
4. Land Capability Land Capability Unit of Foundation Foundation
Unit of Foundation slope stability: high stability: less stability is less
Stability Type of soil: Alluvial (Value: 3) means that the
study-area is
not too stabil,
but can be stabil
by using certain

25
foundation,
such as cakar
ayam
foundation.
5. Land Capability Morphology: Gentle slope Water High water
Unit of Water Slope: 0-2% availability: availability
Availability Type of soil: Alluvial high (Value: means that it is
Rainfall: 1500- 5) easy to get
1750mm/year water in the
study-area.
6. Land Capability Morphology: Gentle slope Drainage: low Low drainage is
Unit of Drainage Slope: 0-2% (Value: 1 and related to the
Elevation: 0-100m 2) difficulty of
Type of soil: Alluvial water-flowing
Rainfall: 1500- and easily
1750mm/year flooded.
7. Land Capability Morphology: Gentle slope Erosion: low Erosion is low
Unit against Erosion Slope: 0-2% to none or almost no
Type of soil: Alluvial (Value: 4 and potential for
Rainfall: 1500- 5) erosion because
1750mm/year the slope
stability is high.
8. Land Capability Morphology: Gentle slope Land Land capability
Unit of Waste Slope: 0-2% capability of of waste
Disposal Elevation: 0-100m waste disposal is
Type of soil: Alluvial disposal: enough means
Rainfall: 1500- enough that the area
1750mm/year (Value: 4 and supports it as a
5) waste disposal
site, but there
must be waste

26
management
site.
9. Land Capability Morphology: Gentle slope Natural Potential of
Unit against Natural Slope: 0-2% disasters natural disasters
Disasters Elevation: 0-100m potential: low (such as flood
Landslides: Zone 4 (safe) (Value: 1) and landslides)
in the study-
area is low, so it
is safe to build
settlements.

Based on the analysis results of land capability unit above, then do the overlay with
weight of every land capability unit. After the overlay is done, we can see in the analysis
results that most of Rungkut District area is categorized as moderate development capability
and some small area with rather high development capability. In this case, the moderate
development capability can be used as an area with certain activities. Based on the analysis
results, Rungkut District can be developed as an agricultural designation (plantations and
ponds), low to moderate-density residential areas, commercials, small scale industrial area,
and other public facilities.
.

27
28
4.2 Land Suitability Analysis
After finishing with land capability analysis, the results of this analysis can be used to
analyze land suitability. Based on Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum No. 20/PRT/M/2007,
land suitability analysis consists of agricultural spatial directives, direction of cover ratio,
direction of building height, direction of utilizitation of raw water, estimated land capacity,
requirements and limitations of development, evaluation of existing land use against land
suitability and land suitability analysis.
The study area in Rungkut District, East Surabaya is categorized as moderate
development capability. Moderate development capability area can be used as an built area
with certain activities. The built area with conditions: proportions between built-area and
non-built area is 50:50, maximum height of 4 floors, building density is low, and can be
developed as an agricultural designation.
The allowed areas in this moderate development capability are protected forests,
production forests, low-density residential areas, commercials and offices, district-scale
public services, small-scale industrial activities, and other designation areas.

4.3 Land Requirements Analysis


Analysis of land requirements is one of the elements of planning that is useful for
predicting future land requirements based on population growth. The population growth
rate is used as a formula for analyzing land requirements because it will affect the proportion
of land use and the level of land requirements in the study area. Existing conditions show that
population growth cannot be balanced with land expansion. It can be controlled by
determining the proportion of each type of land use.
Data on population growth can be seen in the monograph data of Rungkut District.
The data used to project the population is data from 2018, 2023, and 2028. The projected
population in Rungkut Subdistrict in 2018 is 115789 people, in 2023 it is 117560 people and
in 2028 it is 118996 people. From these data, the projected population growth in the study
area in 2017, 2022, 2027. The formula used in population projections is the geometric
formula. Population growth using the basis of multiple interest (compound interest) where
the growth rate increases every year.

29
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
115438 115789 116141 116494 116848 117204

2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028


117560 117918 118276 118636 118996 119358
Table of Projections for the population of the Rungkut District in 2018-2028
Land use in the study area is divided into seven: land use for settlements, trade and
services, industry and warehousing, public facilities, open green space, vacant land, and
ponds.
4.3.1 Land for Settlement Needs Analysis
Based on population projection data in UP. Rungkut, which covers Rungkut
District, we can project the needs of the settlement land. We assume that 1 KK
(family) on average consists of 5 people based on SNI 03-1733-2004, so we can
know the needs of the number of settlements by dividing the population by 5 people
(1 family).
Number of Population (projection)
Amount of Settlements Needed:
Assumption of family member

a. Projected Amount of Settlements (Units) Rungkut District


Number of Population 115789
Amount of Houses Needed in 2018 = =
family member 5
= 23.158 Units
So the Number of Houses Needs in 2018 is 23.158 units

Number of Population 117560


Amount of Houses Needed in 2023 = =
family member 5
=23.512 Units
So the Number of Houses Needs in 2023 is 23.512 units

Number of Population 119358


Amount of Houses Needed in 2028 = =
family member 5
=23.872 Units

30
So the Number of Houses Needs in 2023 is 23.872 units
Based on the Regulation of the Minister of Public Housing of the Republic of
Indonesia Number 10 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Housing and
Settlement Areas with Balanced Occupancy, the implementation of housing and
residential areas with Balanced Residential is carried out in housing, residential
neighborhoods and residential areas with the following scale: Housing with a
minimum number of houses - at least 50 (fifty) to 1000 (one thousand) houses;
Settlements with at least 1000 (one thousand) to 3000 (three thousand) houses. So the
comparison that is intended is in the 3: 2: 1 scale where the following figures mean, 3
implies simple houses, 2 implies middle-class houses, and 1 implies luxury houses.
Based on Law No. 1 of 2011 (housing and residential areas) article 1, paragraph
17 states Housing planning includes Simple Houses, Middle Houses, and Luxury
Houses.
The following classifications are proposed:
1.Simple House
Generally, non-clustered houses, land area, and buildings are generally the
same or wider than Very Simple Houses (≥36m2 / 54m2)
2. Middle Houses
The size of the land and building is larger than a simple house (≥ 75m2 /
120m2)
3. Luxury Houses
4. The size of the land and building is larger than the middle-class house
(50350m2 / 600m2)

b. Projected Land Needs based on the Type of House in Rungkut District


Comparison = Simple Houses : Middle Houses : Luxury Houses = 3 : 2 : 1
 Simple Houses
3
Simple Houses Needed in 2018 = x Amount of Houses Needed in 2018
6
3
= 𝑥 23.158 = 𝟏𝟏. 𝟓𝟕𝟗
6

31
3
Simple Houses Needed in 2023 = x Amount of Houses Needed in 2023
6
3
=
𝑥 23.512 = 𝟏𝟏. 𝟕𝟓𝟔
6
3
Simple Houses Needed in 2028 = x Amount of Houses Needed in 2028
6
3
= 𝑥 23.872 = 𝟏𝟏. 𝟗𝟑𝟔
6
 Middle Houses
2
Middle Houses Needed in 2018 = x Amount of Houses Needed in 2018
6
2
=
𝑥 23.158 = 𝟕. 𝟕𝟏𝟗
6
2
Middle Houses Needed in 2023 = x Amount of Houses Needed in 2023
6
2
= 𝑥 23.512 = 𝟕. 𝟖𝟑𝟕
6
2
Middle Houses Needed in 2028 = x Amount of Houses Needed in 2028
6
2
= 𝑥 23.872 = 𝟕. 𝟗𝟓𝟕
6
 Luxury Houses
1
Luxury Houses Needed in 2018 = x Amount of Houses Needed in 2018
6
1
=
𝑥 23.158 = 𝟑. 𝟖𝟔𝟎
6
1
Luxury Houses Needed in 2023 = x Amount of Houses Needed in 2023
6
1
= 𝑥 23.512 = 𝟑. 𝟗𝟏𝟗
6
1
Luxury Houses Needed in 2028 = x Amount of Houses Needed in 2028
6
1
= 𝑥 23.872 = 𝟑. 𝟗𝟕𝟗
6
In order to find the land needed for the houses, make the assumption of the area
for each type. For example 54m2 for the simple houses, 120 m2 for the middle-class

32
houses, and 600m2 for the luxury houses. Then multiple the houses needed with the
assumption of land area
 Land Needed for Settlement in 2018
Houses Area
Type 2)
Land Needs (m2)
(Unit) (m
Simple Houses 11.579 54 625.266
Middle Houses 7.719 120 926.280
Luxury Houses 3.860 600 2.316.000
Projection of Land Needs for Settlement of Rungkut District in 2028

 Land Needed for Settlement in 2023


Houses Area
Type 2)
Land Needs (m2)
(Unit) (m
Simple Houses 11.756 54 634.824
Middle Houses 7.837 120 926.280
Luxury Houses 3.919 600 2.316.000
Projection of Land Needs for Settlement of Rungkut District in 2028

 Land Needs for Settlement in 2028


Houses Area
Type 2)
Land Needs (m2)
(Unit) (m
Simple Houses 11.936 54 644.544
Middle Houses 7.957 120 954.840
Luxury Houses 3.979 600 2.387.400
Projection of Land Needs for Settlement of Rungkut District in 2028

4.3.2 Land for Facilities Needs Analysis


Whereas to analyze the needs of facilities is based on the minimum service
standards of urban facilities in the direction of SNI 03-1733-2004. Whereas in
analyzing RTH land requirements using the Surabaya City RTRW guidelines, that is

33
at least 30% of the total land area in Rungkut District. The formula in determining the
analysis of the needs of land for facilities is:
Population (projected)
Land Needs Analysis = 𝑥 𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎
Population (Supported)

Here are the Minimum Land Needs for Facilities in Rungkut District
Facilites Population Minimum Land Land Needs (ha)
(supported) Area (m2) 2018 2023 2028
Education 14.950 24150 18,7 18,9 19,2
Facilites
Health 218.750 4.760 0,25 0,25 0,25
Facilites
Religious 12.2750 4.300 0,40 0,41 0,41
Facilities
Trade & 156.250 49.100 3,63 3,69 3,75
Sevices
Facilities
Cultural & 272.500 5.800 0,24 0,25 0,25
Recreational
Facilities
Open Space 272.750 34.500 1,46 1,48 1,50
Facilites

4.4 Land-Use Analysis


Land use in the study area, Rungkut district, Surabaya City, is dominated by the use
of pond type land. The dominance of land use in Rungkut district is caused by the position of
Rungkut -District located in the suburbs of Surabaya. Development has not touched much of
this area so much land is still filled by ponds. The objective of the analysis was to look at the
differences in land use in Rungkut District based on the map of existing land use in Rungkut
District in 2018 and a map of the Rungkut District land use plan in 2014.

34
Below are the existing land use data of Rungkut District in 2018

Land Use Type Area (km2)


Settlement 6,23
Trade and sevice 1,17
Industrial and warehouse 0,85
Public facility 0,57
Green open space 0,07
Vacant land 1,5
Pond 8,55
Total 18,94

Based on that data, here are the calculation of the proportion of land use in Rungkut
District, 2018.

Land Use Proportion in Rungkut District


2018
trade and
sevice industrial and
6% warehouse
5%
public facility
3%

pond
45%

settlement
33%
green
open
vacant land space
8% 0%

35
From the proportions above, it can be seen that ponds have the highest land use area,
about almost 50%. while settlement occupies one-third of the land area. The third highest
proportion is the vacant land of 8%, which indicates the low development in this area.
followed by trade, services, industry, and warehousing sectors which add up to 11%. this
proportion of 11% will support the economy in the district. while public facilities are only
3% and green open spaces are considered 0% because they are very few. Of course, this
proportion of open green space is very far from the target of the city of Surabaya which
demands a minimum of 30% of the land to be filled by green open space.
The next is the difference between the exisiting and plan map of Rungkut District’s
land use. The major difference is that the development of settlement in the eastern of
Rungkut is not completed. The pond still dominate the eastern area while the plan map, the
pond is only planned to give the proportion for about 35%. Below are the existing map of
Rungkut in 2018 and plan map of Rungkut in 2014.

36
37
38
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

With the increasing population growth in Rungkut Subdistrict, the need for land has also
increased. Both land for settlements, trade and services, and others. Rungkut Subdistrict is
predicted to be more developed because according to the planning of Rungkut Subdistrict it
will be used as the industrial center of Surabaya because there is Surabaya Industrial Estate
Rungkut (SIER). This certainly requires the need for residential land as well as wider trade
and services.

If we take a look at the trend of changes in land use in Rugkut district from year to year, the
development of land use has gradually changed towards settlements. The use of ponds is the
most converted into residential areas. However, this does not mean that settlements in
Rungkut district need not be further developed. Settlements in Rungkut district in the future
can be developed through vertical residential development which saves land use. Vertical
residential can answer the residential needs of Rungkut District which will increase in the
future. This plan can be developed based on the results of an analysis of the land capability of
Rungkut District which is rather high.

If we look at the aspects of green open space, we still need a larger proportion because the
proportion is even considered 0%. But it can still be met with the conservation of mangrove
forests. However, Rungkut Subdistrict still needs land for public facilities in the future,
especially in 2028 because currently, the proportion of public facilities in the Rungkut
District is only 3%. Public facilities can be fulfilled with the addition of various facilities
such as education, worship, and health facilities that are spread evenly and reach all Rungkut
Districts.

39
BIBLIOGRAPGHY

Policy on National Regional Spatial Planning (National RTRW – Peraturan Pemerintah RI


No. 26 Tahun 2008)

Surabaya City Based on East Java Province Spatial Planning (RTRW Propinsi – Peraturan
Daerah No. 5 Tahun 2012)

Surabaya City Spatial Planning (RTRW Surabaya – Peraturan Daerah No. 12 Tahun 2014)

Detailed Spatial Plan of UP. Rungkut (RDTRK UP Rungkut Tahun 2014)

Regulation of the Minister of Public Works No. 20/PRT/M/2007

Regulation of the Minister of Environment No. 17 of 2009. Guidelines for Determining Land
Carrying Capacity in Regional Spatial Planning of the State Minister of Environment

Undang-Undang No.23 Year 1997 concerning Environmental Management

Fasilitas Umum dan perjas: SNI 03-1733-2004 concerning Procedures for urban housing
planning ICS 91.020

40

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen