Important Reminders for the Format:

a. Page Number
1. Times New Roman, 12 pt., Not Bold, Bottom-centered
2. No page number indicated for Title Page and Chapter Pages, but included
in the numbering.
b. On the title page, there should be one space gap between author/s, and month and
year of completion.
Example:
JUAN D. DELA CRUZ
MARIA A. AMRES

October 2017
c. Spacing
Double-spaced throughout the content
d. Margin
Bottom, Right and Top – 1 inch
Left – 1.5 inches
e. Figure Format
Figure title should be sentence-cased, light-faced, left-justified, and single-
spaced. Second line of the title should be hanging.
Title Page

DEVELOPMENT OF A GAME-BASED COMPUTER LITERACY

ENHANCEMENT MODULE (GBI-CLEM)

AN UNDERGRADUATE CAPSTONE PROJECT

Presented to the Faculty of College of Arts, Sciences and Technology

OCCIDENTAL MINDORO STATE COLLEGE
Mamburao Campus

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of

Bachelor of Science in Information Technology

JUAN D. DELA CRUZ

MARIA A. AMRES

October 2017
 CHAPTER I

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Introduction

(Please consult your advisers on how to write a better introduction for your study)
Objectives of the Study

The study entitled “Insert Title of your Study here” aims the following:

1. To design a system with the following features:

a. Feature 1

b. Feature 2

c. Feature 3

d. Feature 4

e. Feature 5

2. To create a system with the use of the following applications:

a. Software application 1

b. Software application 2

c. Software application 3

d. Software application 4

3. To test and improve the system.

4. To present the system among respondents and collect the evaluation

results.

5. To produce users’ manual.

Significance of the Study

Significant Persons (1). Explain here why/how the system will benefit them.

Significant Persons (2). Explain here why/how the system will benefit them.

Significant Persons (3). Explain here why/how the system will benefit them.
 Future Researchers. This will serve as their basis on how to conceptualize and

make a study; as their guideline on how to write a study; as a sample output for their future

researches and give them some ideas presented in this study.

Conceptual Framework of the Study

The figure 1 shows the inputs needed by the researchers to initiate the study such

as (1) knowledge requirements, (2) software requirements, and (3) hardware requirements.

It also shows the ideal process for developing the system to generate the output.

(2nd paragraph, Explain the input requirements)

(3rd paragraph, Explain the process)

 Input Process Output

I – Knowledge Requirements Phase 1 TITLE OF THE

STUDY
a. Requirement 1 Phase 2
b. Requirement 2
Phases 3
c. Requirement 3
d. Requirement 4 Phase 4
e. Requirement 5
f. Requirement 6 Add more if necessary
g. Requirement 7
h. Add more if necessary
II – Software Requirements
a. Requirement 1
b. Requirement 2
c. Requirement 3
d. Requirement 4
e. Add more if necessary
III – Hardware Requirements
a. Requirement 1
b. Requirement 2
c. Requirement 3
d. Requirement 4
e. Add more if necessary

Fig. 1. Research paradigm.

Scope and Limitations of the Study

(1st paragraph, please explain here the scope of your study)

(2nd paragraph, please explain here the limitations of your study)

Operational Definition of Terms

This section provides the operational definitions of some unfamiliar words or

terminologies used in this study.

 Term A. Your “own meaningful definition” for the word and arrange this list

alphabetically.

Term B. Your “own meaningful definition” for the word and arrange this list

alphabetically.

Term C. Your “own meaningful definition” for the word and arrange this list

alphabetically.

Term D. Your “own meaningful definition” for the word and arrange this list

alphabetically.
 CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This chapter presents the reviewed literature and studies which directly relevant to

the development of the study.

Topic 1

According to Camus (2017), write and minimize the paragraph, include only the

portion which you used for your system or study. Don’t forget to paraphrase the content

(isasalin sa sariling ninyong pagkakaintindi, hindi copy-paste) and Clamor (2017) also

stated that you should acknowledge the Author/s with Year. Arrange the articles

chronologically, from latest to oldest. Only the articles from 2010 – 2017 are accepted.

Topic 2

Subtopic 1

All the required studies you needed must be presented in this chapter. Hindi pwede

dito ang gawa gawa lang o imbento dahil kailangan may authors lagi at hindi kayo author

para gumawa ng sarili ninyong meaning/definition. Dapat ay related din sa thesis ninyo

ang pinagkukuha ninyo at ang mga nilalagay sa chapter 2 na ito ay dapat alam ninyo,

Aldave (2017).

Subtopic 2

Based on Castillo (2016), ang paglalagay ng author ay pwedeng nasa unahan. Also,

according to the thesis of Tuscano (2015), pwede rin ito ilagay sa kalagitnaan ng paragraph

depende kung idudugtong ninyo ung articles na magkakarelate sa isat isa para mas lumakas

ang inyong dokumento. O kaya naman ay pwede din sa hulihan ng paragraph para hindi
paulit ulit yung pag gamit ng “according to”, “based on” at iba pang introductory words,

Zabala (2014).

Topic 3

Gallego (2013) once stated on his website that ang paglalagay ng authors’ name ay

apelyido lang kasama nito ang taon na nakapaloob sa parenthesis kung kailan nila

naipublished yung kanilang article mapa-aklat man ito, website, TV commercial o ibang

uri ng references na pinagkunan ninyo.

Dapat alamin niyo din ang mga sources na kinukuha o pinagkukunan ninyo kasi

magkakaiba sila ng format. Tandaan lagi ang sumusunod:

a. Author’s name

b. Retrieval date

c. What kind of reference

d. Date published

e. Publisher name or Link/Site Address

Lahat ng yan ay kinakailangan din para magawa ng maayos ang References after

ng Chapter V, Lugtu (2012)

Topic 4

On the website of www.Labarinto.com, nakasulat doon na dapat triple spacing para

sa bagong topic at double spacing lang para sa subtopics. Paki sundan nalang intong ginawa

kong format para di na kayo malito, wag na wag lang ninyong guguluhin. I-retype lang

para mapalitan ang nakasulat dito.

 CHAPTER III

METHODOLOGY

This chapter presents the project design, project development model, operational

and testing procedure, and the evaluation procedure.

Project Design

(1st paragraph, explain ang purpose ng inyong system)

(2nd paragraph, explanation ng Hierarchical diagram)

Home

Admin User About

Fig. 2. Hierarchical diagram.

Project Development

(Explain the system development life cycle model that you used or followed)

Phase 1. Explain kung para saan at ano ang process na ito based sa inyong study.

Phase 2. Explain kung para saan at ano ang process na ito based sa inyong study.

Phase 3. Explain kung para saan at ano ang process na ito based sa inyong study.

Phase 4. Explain kung para saan at ano ang process na ito based sa inyong study.

Phase 5. Add more if necessary

 Data Gathering

Designing

Coding

Testing and
Implementating

Output/Title

Fig. 3. System development life cycle.

Operational and Testing Procedure

Operational Procedure:

1. Procedure here.

2. Procedure here.

3. Procedure here.

4. Procedure here.

5. Procedure here.

6. Procedure here.

7. Add more if necessary.

Testing Procedure:

1. Compatibility testing to screen resolutions 1x1, 2x2, 4x,4.

2. Functionality testing to 1GB, 2GB, 4GB RAM.

3. Functionality testing to 1GB, 2GB, 3GB, video card.

 4. Flexibility testing to Windows operating system (XP, 7, 8, 10) and Android

operating system (Jellybean, Kitkat, Nougat, Kamote)

5. Add more if necessary.

Evaluation Procedure

The following are the procedures used to evaluate the system.

1. Preliminary Evaluation

a. Preliminary evaluation of the researcher on the expected output was

conducted.

2. Project Demonstration

a. 50 randomly selected students of OMSC Mamburao Campus, 25

employees of Provincial Capitol of Mamburao, Occidental Mindoro, 15

Grade 5 pupils of HOSEA Christian School, five (5) IT faculty and five

(5) IT experts were formally invited for the evaluation of the developed

system.

b. Present the system.

c. Asked the invited respondents to operate the system and observe the

performance.

3. Final Evaluation

a. The evaluation instruments were distributed among 100 respondents.

b. Asked the respondents to rate the system based on the criteria of the

evaluation instrument and asked them to provide their comments,

suggestions and recommendations using the five-point Likert scale

presented in Table 1.
 4. Statistical Treatment

a. Collected the graded evaluation instruments from the respondents.

b. Tabulated, calculated, and interpreted the results of the conducted

system evaluation.

Table 1. Likert scale, descriptive rating and range distribution.

Scale Descriptive Rating Range Distribution
5 Excellent 4.51 - 5.50
4 Very Good 3.51 - 4.50
3 Good 2.51 – 3.50
2 Fair 1.51 – 2.50
1 Poor 0.50 – 1.50