Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Paola A. Zuniga
Abstract
The opioid epidemic has been occurring since the 1990s and has only continued to escalade
through the years. The epidemic can be outlined into three waves where the epidemic rose
significantly. The three waves include the 1990s with prescription opioids, 2010 with heroin and
2013 with synthetic opioids. This epidemic has no preference on who becomes affected, it can be
people of all races, living wages and social status. There are two factors that have been found to
contribute most to the epidemic: prior drug use and the over prescription of opioids. Since the
1990s when the problems first arose, the numbers in overdose deaths related to opioids have
continued to rise. Several strategies have attempted to combat the crisis but fail to be successful.
Most plans will only address either the supply side or demand side of the epidemic. By leaving
one part out, the epidemic will never be solved. Instead, a multi-strategical plan of action will
Every day, hundreds of people are becoming addicted to opioids. Some people, like
Blake Landry from Arizona, began by smoking marijuana and worked her way up to
methamphetamine and eventually heroin (Uhl, 2017 pp. 44). Several more people however,
become addicted to opioids after being injured and prescribed pills such as Vicodin. This
happened to Karen Franklin from California when she got injured at her job and needed
medication to deal with the pain (Uhl, 2017 pp. 44). Instances like these are categorized under
The opioid epidemic is an ongoing crisis where people all over the world are becoming
addicted to opioids and eventually overdosing on the drug, whether they are prescriptions,
synthetic opioids, or illegal opioids such as heroin. Any person can become affected by opioids
despite their living class or education level. Contrary to popular belief, it is not only people
living in poverty who become addicted, rather, it is people from across the range of income
levels. There have been several famous people such as Prince or Tom Petty who died of opioid
overdose. Although the number of deaths caused from opioids are continuously rising, a large
majority of populations are oblivious to the epidemic. If not addressed soon, the numbers in
opioid related deaths will continue to rise. Through understanding the origins, pertaining facts,
and previous approaches to end the epidemic, a plan of action to address the crisis will be
devised.
Although opioids have been present in America for centuries, the rise in opioid addictions
and deaths became evident beginning in the 90s. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention
outlines the crisis through three waves in spikes of opioid overdoses. As seen in Figure 1, the
first major spike began in 1990 with an increase of prescribed opioids. This includes any natural
THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC 4
opioids, semi synthetics, and methadone, which can all be prescribed by doctors. Prescription
opioids are used for patients with moderate pain usually after surgery, injury or with diseases
such as cancer. However, during the 90s, it became increasingly common to prescribe opioids to
heroin use despite having some of the lowest rates in history. Following closely with only a
three-year gap, came the third wave of the opioid crisis in 2013. This wave was caused by the
use of synthetic opioids including Fentanyl, which can be up to 100 times more potent than
morphine. Fentanyl is prescribed by doctors, but the increase in deaths is rooted in illegally
produced fentanyl. Illegally made fentanyl is made through the combination of heroin and/or
As mentioned previously, the opioid crisis can affect anyone despite their income level or
Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, found that counties with higher poverty rates and higher
unemployment rates also had higher opioid sale rates (Gherter & Groves 2018). However, when
THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC 5
taking into account that higher rates in poverty and unemployment indicate a higher general
population, the correlation between the crisis and economic opportunity was ultimately found to
be negative. Without consideration of the general population rate, it is easy to confuse the
correlation originally found. This misunderstanding is what causes the misconception of people
living in poverty being more prone to opioids. Ultimately, the ethnic group, poverty level, living
wage or culture have no effect on who is affected by opioid use. What does contribute to the use
of opioids are factors such as the over prescription of opioids and prior drug use.
Many people who have gotten severely injured, have surgeries, or have illnesses like
cancer will often be prescribed opioids such as OxyContin (Jones, Bruera, Salahadin, & Hagop,
2018). OxyContin is a type of opioid and is highly addictive. Once they run out of their
prescription, they will be more than likely addicted and will return to the doctor for another
prescription. Once they have tirelessly obtained opioids through their doctors, they will look to
purchase the drug elsewhere, even if that means illegal opioids. It was found that an estimated
amount of 20%-30% of patients prescribed opioids for chronic noncancer pain misuse them. Of
that percentage, 8%-12% of the patients progressed to develop an opioid use disorder (Jones et
al., 2018). This finding indicates that opioid prescriptions are contributing to the amount of
Pharma and Johnson & Johnson have been sued because of their contribution to the crisis,
despite knowing the side effects that come with the prescriptions (Jones et al., 2018).
Besides the pharmaceutical impact, people can also become addicted to opioids,
especially heroin, due to prior drug use and addiction. According to The Center for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) people already addicted to opioid painkillers are 40 times more
likely to become addicted to heroin (2018). As seen in Figure 2, people addicted to alcohol,
THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC 6
marijuana or cocaine are also at risk to becoming addicted to heroin. Nonetheless, when a person
has history of drug use, their likelihood of later use of opioids is increased, similar to the true
story mentioned earlier of Blake Landry from Arizona, who began using marijuana and later
the two contributing factors present before the overdose (Data Analysis and Resources, 2019).
Since the 1990s when the crisis first began, the deaths related to opioid overdoses have
continuously gone up. Based on statistics found by the CDC, the number of overdose deaths
involving opioids in 2017 was 6 times higher than in 1999 (2018). Besides the increase in deaths,
the total number of drug overdose deaths between 1999-2017 is astonishing. More than 700,000
people have died of a drug overdose from 1999-2017. 68% percent of the 70,200 people from
2017 alone were involved in an opioid overdose (Understanding the Epidemic, 2018). Also
found by the CDC is the statistic that “On average, 130 Americans die every day from an opioid
overdose.” (2018). In 2016, the Department of Health and Human Services found that 116
THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC 7
An article written at the University of Pennsylvania by a blog from the Leonard Davis
Institute, titled Health Policy$ense, states why deaths continue to rise. Health Policy$ense
believes the policies being implemented either focus on reducing the demand or the supply of
opioids (Glickman & Weiner, 2019). By only reducing either the demand or the supply, the
policy leaves out one part of the problem. Reducing only the supply of opioids would reduce the
number of people who could develop an opioid use disorder (OUD) but fails to address the
people who have already developed the disorder. Vice versa, reducing only the demand of people
who already have an OUD will fail to focus on the people at risk. Therefore, Glickman and
Weiner of Health Policy$ense concluded that in order to end the crisis, a strategy that involves
prevention as well as treatment is necessary (2019). Another article which can be found in the
Yale Medicine Magazine, suggests a similar strategy to combat the crisis. Dr. Davis Fiellin who
was interviewed for the magazine article says, “We need to decrease the availability of all types
of opioids, and we need to increase the availability of the most effective forms of treatment.”
THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC 8
(Hamm, 2018). Along with this suggested strategy, Hamm believes society needs to first stop
shaming people and instead provide empathy to people with opioid use disorder as they are not
“junkies” but instead people with a disease (Hamm, 2018). Once society sees them as people
with a disease, solutions including treatment will be erected. Lastly, the Journal of Policy
Analysis and Management had another strategy to combat the crisis. Their plan focuses primarily
on the treatment of people who have already developed an OUD. They suggest that there should
be more access to the opioid antagonist, naltrexone, to repel opioids from the brain’s opioid
receptors (Saloner & Barry, 2018). The overall plan focuses on the use of other medications to
After analyzing the different strategies suggested by experts, a plan that combines all the
strategies to combat the opioid crisis should work efficiently. The main part of the strategy
should coincide with the statement from Health Policy$ense, that we need to address both the
supply side as well as the demand side of the crisis (Glickman & Weiner, 2018). For the supply
side, the number of opioids distributed to the populations must be reduced. It also needs to be
ensured that pharmaceutical companies are providing proper warning on labels on any opioids
they do prescribe. This will be made possible by laws being enforced throughout the nation. As
seen in the lawsuit of Purdue Pharma, after having to pay a fee for the erroneous portrayal of the
addiction risk, their sales in opioids went down significantly (Jones et al., 2018). Secondly, to
address the demand, proper treatment needs to be available. It was found that residential
treatments without medication and other behavioral therapies had poor success rates (Saloner &
Barry, 2018). Therefore, it will be more beneficial to use medication such as Naltrexone which is
a known opioid antagonist with high success rates. By simultaneously using these tactics, the
number of opioids in circulation will decrease significantly, bringing the opioid crisis to an end.
THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC 9
References
Ghertner, R., & Groves, L., (2018). The opioid crisis and economic opportunity: geographic and
https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/259261/ASPEEconomicOpportunityOpioidCrisis.pd
Glickman, A., & Weiner, J. (2019). Why deaths continue to rise in the opioid epidemic. Health
continue-rise-opioid-epidemic
Hamm, S. (2018). New strategies for combating the opioid epidemic. Yale Medicine. Retrieved
from https://medicine.yale.edu/news/yale-medicine-magazine/new-strategies-for-
combating-the-opioid-epidemic/
Jones, G.H., Bruera, E., Abdi, S., & Kantarjian, H. M. (2018). The opioid epidemic in the United
10.1002/cncr.31713
Konschak C. (2018). The evolving roles of health IT in fighting the opioid crisis. Divurgent.
Opioid Overdose: Data Analysis and Resources. (2019). Center for Disease Control and
Opioid overdose: Understanding the epidemic. (2018). Center for Disease Control and
Saloner, B., & Barry, L. C. (2018). Ending the opioid epidemic requires a historic investment in
438. doi:10.1002/pam.22047
Uhl, M.X. (2017). Who Is Using Opioids and Opiates? Available from
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1930387&site=eds-
live&scope=site