Sie sind auf Seite 1von 46

Receiver Noise Figure

Pass Loss

Tx Output Pass Loss


Rx Noise Figure

Noise Floor

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Power Spectrum of Global System for Mobile (GSM)

Close-in
In-band
i t f
interferers

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Sensitivity vs. Selectivity
Desired Channel
to select MIXER IF Filter
Input Output

if
if
rf Received channels after
Received channels after frequency translation
Received Channels at RF frequency translation
LO

‰ Sensitivity
y The minimum (available) signal power needed at the receiver input to provide
adequate SNR at the receiver output to data demodulation
y Noise
y Insertion Loss
y Inter-modulation products
‰ Selectivity
y Blockers (in-band and out-of-band)
y Phase Noise
y Image-Rejection (will be discussed with radio architecture)

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Required Receiver Sensitivity – A Qualitative View
What is the required receiver NF to achieve
a certain level of sensitivity?

Transmit Power ‰ To find Receiver NF


y Transmit Power – FCC regulated
y Path loss
Path Loss
y Receiver sensitivity – govern by
standards and applications
R i Sensitivity
Receiver S iti it y Required SNR – depends on BER
Noise Figure requirement and modulation
scheme
Required SNR y Noise floor – thermal noise or
circuit noise limited depending on
Noise Floor the modulation schemes

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Receiver NF Requirement Calculations
‰ IEEE 802
802.11a
11a WLAN
‰ GSM (DCS-1800 ) cellular
‰ FCC limits the PSD in 5GHz
to 2.5 mW/MHz ‰ FCC limits the PSD in 1.8 GHz
‰ Channel bandwidth is 16 MHz to 5 mW/kHz
‰ T
Transmitit Power
P iis 40 mW
W or 16 dB
dBm ‰ Ch
Channell bandwidth
b d idth isi 200 kHz
kH
‰ Thermal noise floor ‰ Thermal noise floor
–174 dBm/Hz X 16 MHz = –102 dBm
–174 dBm/Hz X 200 kHz = –121 dBm
‰ Total SNR budget is
16 dBm
dB – (–102
( 102 dBm)
dB ) = 118 dBm
dB ‰ Required SNR for GSM is 9 dB
‰ To cover ~300 ft. at 5 GHz results in a path y to keep BER < 10–3
loss of 86 dB
‰ GSM receiver sensitivity specification
y i.e. Receiver sensitivity is –70 dBm
(802 11a specification is –65
(802.11a 65 dBm ) is –102
102 dBm
‰ Required SNR for 64QAM (54Mbps) is 27 dB ‰ Receiver noise figure requirement
y 802.11a packet length is 8 kb = Receive sensitivity – Noise floor –
Worst packet loss < 10%,
y
Required SNR
(1 – BER)8000 = 1 – 10%
BER = 10–5
= –102 – (–121) – 9 = 10 dB
‰ Receiver noise figure requirement
= Tx Power– Path Loss – Required SNR –
Noise floor
= 16 + 102 – 86 – 27 = 5 dB

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Receiver Sensitivity for GSM

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


One More Receiver Sensitivity Calculation Example

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Fundamental Concepts in RF Systems
‰ Receiver sensitivity
y Noise Figure
y Signal to noise ratio (SNR)
y Thermal noise floor
‰ Receiver selectivity
y Nonlinearityy
 gain compression
 inter-modulation
 desensitization
 cross modulation
y Phase noise and blockers
‰ Receiver spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR)
y Lower limit set by sensitivity
y Upper limit set by selectivity

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Key Receiver Metrics
‰ At any input signal level, the receiver must achieve a minimum
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)
y Detection schemes need a minimum signal-to-noise ratio for adequate
performance
f
 Some analog detectors (AM detectors) improve gradually with increasing SNR
 Digital detectors improve rapidly past a threshold SNR
‰ Dynamic range
y The range of input power (signal and interferer) over which the receiver
performs adequately
 Measured by performance of the base-band transducer (speaker/video display etc)
 For system analysis, Bit Error Rates or final SNR are used
y Smallest signal level is the receiver sensitivity
y Largest signal determines the upper limit of dynamic range (What does
‘largest signal’ mean? We will come back to this point later…)

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Receiver Architecture Considerations
‰ Heterodyne is a well-proven architecture
y Monolithic implementation (low-cost integration) is a challenge owing to the
large number of BPF’s required
‰ Alternative architecture suitable for integration will be studied later
‰ The architecture as shown is a consequence of available technologies
y For example, if low loss, tunable front-end BPFs could be manufactured for
channel select, the receiver could be replaced by one mixer
‰ The components shown are usually common to all architectures with
possibly different requirements
‰ Front-end circuits (e. g. LNA & Mixer) are critical design challenges and
technology drivers in wireless applications

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Functions of Receiver Components (1)
Image Channell
Ch ADC I
T/R Reject Select IF
Switch Balun LNA Filter RF Mixer Filter VGA
LO2 (Tuned)
o
RF 90
Band Select
Filter ADC Q
LO1 (Fixed)
IF Mixer Anti-alias
Anti alias
O PCB
On On-Chip
LPF

‰ RF band select filter


y typically a ceramic filter
y Used to filter and reduce incident power levels of distant interferers at the LNA
y allows the entire RF Band (all possible useful channels) into the receiver
y rejects out
out-of-band
of band signals and attenuates image signals
‰ Transmit / Receive Switch
y connects the antenna to the receiver or transmitter in a time-division duplexed systems
‰ Balun
y “Bal”anced to “Un”-balanced
y differential to single-ended converter
Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB
Functions of Receiver Components (2)
Image Channell
Ch ADC I
T/R Reject Select IF
Switch Balun LNA Filter RF Mixer Filter VGA
LO2 (Tuned)
o
RF 90
Band Select
Filter ADC Q
LO1 (Fixed)
IF Mixer Anti-alias
Anti alias
O PCB
On On-Chip
LPF

‰ Low Noise Amplifier (LNA)


y Front-end amplifier used to amplify the signal with minimum degradation in the SNR
y amplifies the signal to reduce impact of noise from latter stages
‰ Image Reject Filter
y Ceramic (or SAW) band-pass filter used to provide filtering of distant interferers
y Used primarily to reject the ‘image frequency’ of local oscillator (LO1)
y Allows the entire RF Band (all possible useful channels) into the receiverattenuates image-signals before
mixing
‰ RF Mixer
y converts the incoming RF signal to intermediate frequency (IF) is the difference between the RF and LO1
y Usually have stringent linearity and noise requirement

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Functions of Receiver Components (3)
Image Channell
Ch ADC I
T/R Reject Select IF
Switch Balun LNA Filter RF Mixer Filter VGA
LO2 (Tuned)
o
RF 90
Band Select
Filter ADC Q
LO1 (Fixed)
IF Mixer Anti-alias
Anti alias
O PCB
On On-Chip
LPF

‰ Channel select filter


y Select the desired the channel and rejects adjacent channels
y Typically requires a SAW filter with high attenuation to suppress out of band tones
‰ Intermediate frequency variable gain amplifier (IF VGA)
y adjusts the received signal level so that it maps to the dynamic range of the based-band
circuits such as the ADC
‰ IF mixers
y Down-converts the I & Q signals to base-band for signal processing
y I th
In the above
b example,l we assume that
th t the
th iimage ffrequency iis greatly
tl attenuated
tt t d bby the
th
channel select filter and therefore image-reject mixers are not used.

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Receiver Requirements
‰ Gain and stability requirements
y Power gain, voltage gain, stability measures
‰ Low-noise requirements
y Noise figure or temperature
y Desensitization (impact of non-linearity on noise performance)
‰ Linearityy requirements
q
y Intercept points, gain compression

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Noise in Receiver
‰ Receiver “noise level” directly limits sensitivity
‰ Receiver sensitivity = minimum input power that the receiver can detect
‰ Noise figure
g of cascaded stages
g
y Noise figure of RF receivers from antenna to ADC output
y Noise figure of passive networks
y Noise figure
g of ADC

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Input-Referred SNR in Terms of Noise Factor

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Receiver Sensitivity – Min. Pin to Achieve Required SNR (1)

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Receiver Sensitivity – Min. Pin to Achieve Required SNR (2)

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Receiver Sensitivity – Min. Pin to Achieve Required SNR (3)

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Noise Figure for Cascaded Stages

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Noise Factor of Passive (Lossy) Networks

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Noise Figure Calculation of BPF Followed by LNA

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


SNR of Analog-to-Digital Converter

‰ Typically, ADC is characterized using SNR at the output rather than NF


‰ To determine the NF of an ADC
ADC, we need to compute the degradation in
SNR due to quantization noise after the signal passes through the ADC
Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB
Noise Figure of Analog-to-Digital Converter
SNR in P / Noise
N i in N i out
Noise
NF ADC = = in =
SNR out Pout / Noise out Noise in

‰ Since the ADC only performs digitization of the input voltage and thus does not
provide
id any gain,
i ii.e. Pin = Pout, the
th output
t t signal
i l can bbe ttreated
t d as th
the input
i t signal
i l
plus quantization noise. Expressing NF in log form, we obtain:
NF = Noise out ( dBm ) − Noise in ( dBm )

‰ Assume that the ADC noise is completely due to quantization error, then
Noise out ( dBm ) = Pin − SNR ADC

‰ A
Assume that
th t the
th noise
i att the
th input
i t is
i due
d tto th
thermall noise,
i then
th
NF ( dB ) = Pin − SNR ADC − Noise in
= Pin − SNR ADC − kTB
‰ One can also express NF as the power ratio of quantization noise (at the output)
and thermal noise (at the input) which results in:
NP 02( rms ) 2
V FS 1 Quantizati on Noise a t Output
NF = = ⋅ =
A p , ADC × 4 kTR s B 2 2 N × 12 × R s kTB Thermal No ise at Inp ut
1
( A p , ADC = )
4
Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB
Effect of Over-Sampling on ADC NF

‰ Increasing the sampling frequency reduce noise


noise, which has the same effect as
increase the ADC resolution
y Over-sampling by a factor of 4 results in 6 dB reduction in noise, or effectively 1 more bit
Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB
Receiver Requirements
‰ Gain and stability requirements
y Power gain, voltage gain, stability measures
‰ Low-noise requirements
y Noise figure or temperature
y Desensitization (impact of non-linearity on noise performance)
‰ Linearityy requirements
q
y Intercept points, gain compression

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Interferers in Global System for Mobile (GSM)

Close-in
In-band
i t f
interferers

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


The “Large Signal”

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Interferers

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Linear Systems
‰ Th system
The t S iis linear
li if and
d only
l if
if:
x1 y1 x1+ x2 y1+y2
Then: x S y
x2 y2 αx1 αy1

‰ In other words in a linear system, the output can be expressed as a linear


combination of the responses to the individual inputs. In a linear system
with no initial stored energy, the output time function is related to the
input time function∞
by the convolution integral:
y (t ) = ∫ x( τ ) h (t – τ ) dτ
–∞
where h(t) is the system response to a unit impulse. In frequency
domain: Y j = X j H j
( ω) ( ω) ( ω)

System transfer function



– j ωt
H( j ω ) = ∫ h( t) e dt
–∞
Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB
Source of Non-linearity
‰ A system is time-invariant if a time shift in the input results in the same
time shift in the output:

x(t) y(t) Then: τ)


x(t-τ)
x(t τ)
y(t-τ)
y(t

‰ In linear time invariant systems, a single frequency input can only


generate a single frequency output.
output
‰ A linear time variant system, e.g. a mixer, can generate frequency
components that do not exist in the input, which cause non-linearity.
‰ Device non-linearity
non linearity

ID = K(V GS - VT)2

Ic = Ics. Exp
E (qV
( VBE /KT)

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Gain Expansion or Compression due to Nonlinearity
‰ F time-variant,
For ti i t memoryless
l systems,
t we can assume
x(t) NL y(t)

y(t) = a1 x(t) + a2x2(t) + a3x3(t) + ...

x(t) = Acos(ωct)

y(t) = a1Acos(ωct) + a2A2cos2 (ωct) + a3A3cos3(ωct) + ...

a2 2 a3 3 a2 2 a3 3
= ----- A + ⎛ a1 A + 3----- A ⎞ cos ( ω ct ) + ----- A cos ( 2 ωc t ) + ----- A cos (3 ω c t )
2 ⎝ 4 ⎠ 2 4
‰ From this equation we see that the output signal consists of a component at the
applied fundamental frequency ωc and spurious signals at dc, the second
harmonic 2ωc, and the third harmonic 3ωc.
‰ The amplitude of the fundamental component can be greater than a1A (the gain if
the two-port is linear) if a3>0 and smaller than a1A if a3 < 0. This property is called
gain expansion or gain compression.

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


1-dB Compression Point

Aout Aout
1 dB
A
a 3<0
Ao u t = output amplitude @ ωc
A1 dB A A

‰ Gain at fundamental frequency = 20log |a1 + 0.75a3A2|


‰ Linear Gain = 20log |a1|
‰ At the 1-dB compression point, the actual gain is 1dB below the linear gain
20log |a1 + 0.75a3A2| = 20log |a1| – 1
‰ Therefore for , a1
A-1dB2 = – 0.145a1/a3 (a3 < 0) or A−1dB = 0.145 ×
a3
P-1dB = A-1dB2 / 2R
Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB
Blocker and Desensitization
‰ Blocker: If input signal to the receiver consists of a weak desired signal at
ωc1 accompanied by a strong interferer at ωc2 (the blocker). The blocker
tends to reduce the average gain experienced by the desired signal:

‰ Meaning that the effective signal gain at ωc1 (desired signal) is reduced by

‰ For large
g enough p at ωc1 is
g A2, the receiver is “desensitized” as the output
overwhelmed by the blocker.

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Inter-modulation
‰ Intermodulation products due to two input tones:

4 a1
× = AIP3
3 a3

IIP3 = AIP32 / 2R

When A = IIP3, the 3rd order term = fundamental at the output


( i compression
(gain i is
i neglected,
l t d ii.e. 9/4*a
9/4* 3*A3 << a1A)

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Signal Corruption due to IIP3 of Interferers

Aint, out
Aint, in
Asig, out
Asig, in AIM3,out

‰ Given Asig, in, Aint, in and IIP3, we want to find


the ratio of the signal to IM3,
IM3 ii.e.
e Asig, out / AIM3,out at the output

‰ To find the dynamic range, we refer Asig, out / AIM3,out to the input

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


IP3 Calculation and Graphical Interpretation
‰ To express IIP3 in terms of the input Aint,out 2
AIP
= 3
and output signal amplitudes, take 2
AIM 3,out Aint,
the ratio of the first and third terms in

from the previous expression and


express in terms of IIP3 (Slope = 1)

Aint,out

(Slope = 3)

AIM3,out
Aint,in

AIM3, in = AIP3
Aint,in
Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB
Signal Corruption due to IIP3 of Interferers
Aint, out
Aint, in
Asig, out
Asig, in AIM3,out

Asig ,out 2
Aint,out Aint,out 1 AIP 3 1
= ⇒ Asig ,out = × Asig , in = 2
×
Asig , in Aint, in Aint, in AIM 3,out Aint, in
Aint,,out

Asig ,out 2
AIP 3
⇒ = 3
× Asig , in
AIM 3,out Aint, in

‰ Given Asig, in = 1μVrms, Aint, in = 1mVrms, and IIP3 = – 10dBm (AIP3 = 70mVrms on 50 Ω)

Asig ,out 1μ
= × (70 m )3
= 4.9 = 13.8dB
AIM 3,out (1m ) 3

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Relation between 1-dB Compression Point and IIP3

a1
A1dB = 0.145 × (with single tone input)
a3

4 a1
IIP 3 = × (with dual tone input)
3 a3

A1dB 0.145
= = 0.33
IIP 3 4/ 3

IIP 3 (dB) = A1dB (dB) + 9.6

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


IIP3 of Cascaded Stages (I)

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


IIP3 of Cascaded Stages (II)

The term consisted of α2 (due to 2nd order distortion)


can be neglected if gain of stage 1 has a band-pass characteristic

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Dynamic Range

DR = P1dB – kTB(dBm) – F – SNRmin

DR = IIP3 –9.6
9 6 – kTB(dBm)
kTB(dB ) – F – SNRmin

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Spurious Free Dynamic Range

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Receiver Selectivity
‰ A measure of the receiver
receiver’ss ability to reject signal outside of the desired
band.
‰ We have seen that IM3 due to two adjacent channels creating spurious
tone in the designed signal band
‰ Blockers and phase noise of the local oscillator (LO) signal also
degrades receiver selectivity.
y Ph
Phase noise
i iis a measure off spectral
t l purity
it off th
the LO signal
i l

Blocker

Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB


Phase Noise Requirement
Input
Spectrum
BL
BW
Desired
Receiver
f Output
Receiver Desired
Δf c Signal
Phase Noise Signal Vout Blocker
S x ((f)) Mixed
LO C/Im in
Local Inband
Osc.
Output -PN (Δ fc )
f
f L0

f
Δfc

‰ Assume that the receiver is noiseless, therefore required SNR is


determined by C/Imin (Carrier / Interferer ratio)
(
C / I min ( dB ) = S signal − Sblock + PN Δfc (dBc ) )
= S signal − Sblock − PN Δfc (dBc / Hz ) − 10 log(
g( BW )

PN Δfc (dBc / Hz ) = S signal − Sblock − C / I min ( dB ) − 10 log( BW )


Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB
Phase Noise Requirement Calculation

‰ PCS 1900 (North America version of GSM)


y Desired signal at fo can be as small as
–99dBm with –43-dBm blocker at 600kHz
y GSM required SNR is 9 dB
y Channel bandwidth is 200 kHz
y PN (at 600kHz offset)
= – 99 – (– 43) – 9 – 10log(2e5)
= – 118 dBc/Hz
Prof. C. Patrick Yue, ECE, UCSB

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen