Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Bank Reconciliation
Course Introduction
Module 1: Introduction to Bank Reconciliation
Module 2: Outgoing Payments
Module 3: Incoming Payments
Each transaction on an imported bank statements has a direct impact on the balance of the
account that the UN keeps with the bank. It results in either a reduction in this balance (i.e. the
bank has paid out money from our account) or in an increase in the money we have at the bank
(i.e. the bank has received money into our account). The material in this User Aid is organized
around these two types of transactions – Outgoing and Incoming Payments.
The remainder of this Introduction explains the framework in which Outgoing and Incoming
Payments are manually matched and cleared. We’ll consider the following successively:
1. House Banks,
2. Bank Clearing Accounts,
3. FEBAN, the tcode used for manual bank reconciliation,
Operational Funds (e.g. Missions) no longer have balances in their own bank accounts. Instead they
have equity in the Treasury Main Pool. The equity of each Fund in the Pool increases with the Fund’s
incoming payments and falls with outgoing payments.
Outgoing Payments will be pooled by currency, based on House Bank Determination logic. Foreign
currency payments will be delegated to the appropriate House Bank account, maintained by UNHQ
Treasury. Local payments will continue to be the responsibility of the mission-based cashiers.
Outgoing Payments will result in a decrease in the equity that mission fund has in the Treasury Main
Pool 64VQA.
Similarly, incoming payments will be recorded in the Treasury Main Pool Fund 64VQA and will result
in an increase in the equity of the mission for which the money is destined.
Sells supplies
UNMISS Vendor in
Payment amount deducted Lebanon
from the balance of the Pays for supplies from
UNMISS fund in the cash its House Bank Account
pool
Funding
Suppose the UN Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) purchases goods from a vendor in Lebanon and
payment is by cheque in Lebanese Pounds (LBP). According to the house bank determination logic,
the vendor will be paid from the LBP House Bank Account, managed by the United Nations Interim
Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL). UNMISS’s equity in the Treasury Pool will reduce by the amount of the
payment.
Example: The GL accounts of the bank account opened in the books of NY JP Morgan, Cash HQ
New York JP Morgan USD Wire ACH Nominal are as follows:
1-101-1010 Cash HQ USD Nominal
1-101-1011 Cash HQ USD Cheque Out
1-101-1012 Cash HQ USD Cheque In
1-101-1014 Cash HQ USD EFT Out
1-101-1016 Cash HQ USD EFT In
1-101-1017 Cash HQ USD Invest
1-101-1018 Cash HQ USD Charges
1-101-1019 Cash HQ USD Unidentified
Later, we’ll see how these clearing accounts ensure that bank reconciling items do not appear in
the GL Bank Nominal account. This ensures that the balance in the Nominal is equal to the balance
in the physical bank account.
Course Introduction
Module 1: Introduction to Bank Reconciliation
Module 2: Outgoing Payments
Module 3: Incoming Payments
Cashier’s Office
When the cashier
generates payment
(F110 and FPRL_LIST) an
Outgoing Payment (KZ
doc type) is created
with these entries:
• Dr. Vendor
• Cr. Cash EFT AP
As mentioned earlier these are two of the seven GL accounts created to record
balances and reconciling items for each House Bank that UN Treasury opens.
The task of reconciling transactions with the bank, which result from the Outgoing
Payments that we create is essentially the processing of the credits that are
temporarily booked to these clearing accounts when the cashier generates payments.
While some of the transactions will reconcile automatically, others will have to be
cleared manually.
Whether a bank transaction resulting from our Outgoing Payment will be reconciled
automatically or manually depends on what happens when bank statements are
uploaded into Umoja.
This reflects the fact that the bank has debited our account for the disbursement they
made on our behalf. Umoja thus reduces the balance of the Bank Nominal in the GL to
synchronize it with the balance held by the bank. Put differently, in principle, as far as
Outgoing Payments are concerned the GL Bank Nominal a/c will only be credited when
the bank has effectively paid out money as instructed by the UN. Any Outgoing
Payments generated by us but for which the bank has not yet made disbursements will
appear in the GL Cash EFT AP (or Cheque Out) and not in the GL Bank Nominal.
Note: Later on, we’ll examine what happens when the bank debits our account in their books without an
instruction from us to them to make a disbursement on our behalf.
We’ve also seen that when an uploaded bank statement shows a debit in our account
at the bank, Umoja creates a ZR document crediting our GL Bank Nominal i.e.:
Dr. Cash EFT AP (or Cheque Out)
Cr. Bank Nominal
Umoja will attempt to establish a link between the credit in the KZ document and the
debit in the ZR document. Two possible outcomes exist.
1. If both entries relate to the same transaction, Umoja will establish a match and use the
ZR document to clear the KZ document. In this case the ZR document could be viewed as
confirmation to us that the instruction given in the KZ document has been executed
successfully. We can therefore close the case. No more bank reconciliation work is
needed for this Outgoing Payment.
2. If a link can’t be established, automatic clearance will fail. We will have to manually
apply the ZR document to the KZ document. Otherwise, both documents will remain
open (un-reconciled items).
1 2
2.
2 Amount. A match will not be established if there is a discrepancy between the amounts
in both documents, whatever the magnitude of the difference.
Example
A payable of $1,400 was established for Vendor 2080001758 through KR 3100000288. The cashier
generated payment (KZ 3300000272) via House Bank JPM Chase US with credit to clearing A/c
11011014 Csh HQ USD EFT AP. The bank paid out the money and debited our account in their books
by $1,400, as well as included the ref. 3300000272 in bank statement #13283. Let’s see what happens
when this statement is uploaded.
– it is an Outgoing Payment 6
(negative sign).
3.6 Also the status of the transaction is
green, meaning that the debit of
the ZR document (6300000416)
created by Umoja when the
statement was uploaded
automatically cleared with the
credit of the existing KZ document 7
(3300000272).
4.7 Double click the ZR document # to 8
see its accounting entries.
5.8 Note that PmtAcc field is empty.
b/ ZR 6300000421
Dr. Cash EFT AP
Cr. Cash EFT AP
Both the debit and credit are in
the same account but not
matched to each other. Manual
reconciliation is essentially
pairing the two entries.
12
9
10
11
13
14 15
16
As before, at the time the bank statement is uploaded, Umoja creates a ZR document:
Dr. Cash EFT AP and
Cr. Bank Nominal
Since a payable will not be established and consequently neither an Outgoing Payment
(KZ) will be generated, bank reconciliation in this case will consist of:
1. Raising a JV to transfer the debit from the Cash EFT AP account to an expense account.
2. Ensuring that the assignment of both the debit (from the bank statement, doc type ZR)
and the credit (from the JV, doc type SA) have the same assignment or clear them using
F-03 (in case there are many debits to be cleared).
3. Bank charges are usually not cleared using FEBAN as it has been designed that these
transactions (they might be many lines) will appear as cleared in FEBAN (but still open in
the GL). With a JV many lines could be cleared in one go.
Course Introduction
Module 1: Introduction to Bank Reconciliation
Module 2: Outgoing Payments
Module 3: Incoming Payments
Before looking at how to reconcile Incoming Payments. Let’s first see how to identify Open Customer
Items.
When an EFT Incoming Payment is received, the customer’s account is not immediately credited
in the GL. Instead the credit is temporarily booked to the EFT In a/c. This is one of the seven GL
accounts created to record balances and reconciling items for each House Bank that UN Treasury
opens.
The task of reconciling transactions with the bank, which result from the Incoming Payments that
we receive, essentially consists of moving these credits from the EFT In account to the respective
accounts where the funds are to be lodged. This maybe done automatically by Umoja (we see how
shortly), or manually.
Whether a bank transaction resulting from Incoming Payments will be reconciled automatically or
manually depends on what happens when bank statements are uploaded into Umoja.
Matching to Clear
If the incoming payment contains information e.g. invoice number, that identifies an existing
receivable (customer) or recoverable (vendor) for the same amount, Umoja will establish a match
between the two. The receivable or recoverable will be automatically cleared by the incoming
payment.
• Dr 64VQA Bank EFT In Clearing (GL A/c 11011X16)
• Cr 20OLA Customer/Vendor Open Item
The task of the bank reconciler is to move the funds from the EFT-In account to a Customer/
Vendor’s account when the system fails to do so automatically.
One reason why automatic clearance will fail is when the reference on the bank statement for the
Incoming Payment doesn’t match an open receivable or recoverable item in the system.
To illustrate how manual clearance is done in this case, we’ll use the following data set.
• Customer: 1111000010 – Government of Belgium
• Outstanding Amount: US$ 15,700
• Being: Sale of Publications
• AR Document #: 2200000485
11
13 14 14
b/ DZ 2400000204
Dr. Cash EFT In
Cr. Customer
Note the differences in posting
keys, Business Area and Fund, as
we debited a GL a/c and credited
an AR Subledger a/c. Further, P003
ensures UNIFIL’s equity increases
in 64VQA by amount received.
Scenario
Customer 1111000026 – Municipality of Deir Mimas, used our air asset in June 2013. They were
invoiced on 08 Oct. ‘13 for the full amount of $4,500. The customer however contests this amount
because food wasn’t served on board. They only paid $4,000 directly into our account on 08 Oct.
‘13. The AR document number was correctly referenced in Bank Statement # 13282 of House Bank
USCH2. However, when the statement was uploaded on 09 Oct. ‘13 automatic clearance failed
because of differences in amount between the Incoming Payment and customer open item. We are
required to do the manual reconciliation.
12
Scenario
Staff member 1110001280 – Abou Saleh, owed UNIFIL $100.00 for private telephone calls he made
while on mission there during Pilot Go-live last July. A credit memo (Doc type KG #3200000063)
was raised to record this recoverable on 30 August 2013. The staff member transferred $100.00 to
our House Bank USUS1. The Incoming Payment was reflected in our bank statement #13279 of 09
October 2013. Perform the manual reconciliation.
11
Scenario
On 24th October an Incoming Payment of USD 1,200 was included in bank statement 1265 of House
Bank USCH1. By the 30th of October when the Month End Closing was done, it was still not possible
to move the funds to a Customer or Vendor a/c because the receivable or recoverable could not be
established. It was decided to move the funds to AP Unapplied Cash until the receivable or
recoverable is set up.
5 5
12
13
16 16
Scenario
On 30.08.2013 an Incoming Payment of USD 75.446,42 was included in bank statement 12243 of
House Bank USCH1. After communication with treasury department, bank reconciler finds out that
the amount has been returned by the bank. It is the total for 2 payments rejected by the bank
Bank reconciler is going to transfer the amounts to a clearing account. Account payable will then re-
issue the payment.
1 2
Enter Business
Area, Fund and
Grant of original
invoice
Click on enter
The steps to move the funds from EFT In to Unapplied Cash are the same as those described in
Case 5.