Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Policy Brief Paper Regarding Food Insecurity Among College Students In The CSU System
HSCI 660D
Executive Summary
According to the Healthy People 2020 initiative, food insecurity is defined as the disruption
of food intake or eating patterns due to lack of money and other resources (Food Insecurity., n.d.).
However, the food insecurity definition exhibits a high level of subjectivity, meaning that food
insecurity is often associated with the individual's well-being and the individual's perception of
what it means to be food insecure. Moreover, the United States Department of Agriculture defines
the hierarchy of food insecurity as a pyramid that demonstrates the severity of food insecurity an
individual may have (Measurement, 2018). It is important to note that an individual may have
access to food and still be considered food insecure; this can occur due to the lack of healthy food
At the top of the hierarchy of food insecurity, Food Security, refers to an individual who is
not experiencing problems or anxiety in accessing quality food options. An individual can
experience Marginal Food Security, which describes an instance of occasional concern about
accessing quality food but has not reduced their food intake. The third tier of the hierarchy
represents the situation of Having Low Food Security, where an individual has reduced access to
quality foods and presents with few signs of reduced food intake. The final tier named Very Low
Food Security describes the experiencing of multiple instances of food disruptions, and the
reduction of food at each meal (Measurement, 2018). These hierarchical tiers of food security are
critical to understanding and to be taken into consideration when proposing policies that will target
There exists a significant correlation between an individual's socioeconomic status and the
statistical likelihood of obtaining a higher education. Today, the students from face additional
barriers that prohibit them from thriving in a university setting – the rise in tuition costs and food
Policy Brief Paper Regarding Food Insecurity Among 3
prices have made students susceptible to the realities of food insecurity. In the California State
University (CSU) system, 41% of CSU students face one of the three levels of food insecurity.
The majority of students who were food insecure reported having merger food security (Maguire,
J., & Crutchfield, R. 2018). As a result, the state of California enacted the Basic Needs Initiative
to provide a framework for all CSU campuses to assist students who are food insecure and lack
Through the implementation of the Basic Needs Initiative, most CSU campuses created
food pantries, and emergency food locations for students are food insecure. Unfortunately, the
Basic Needs Initiative fails to provide students with complete support toward reliving their food
insecurity situation. For example, it fails to provide nutritional education courses that could teach
students about how to choose healthier food options and to provide adequate resources to each
campus.
funding to all CSU campuses to hire full-time staff to manage and increase hours of operation to
7 days a week hours for the food pantry, creating on-campus gardens, and nutritional education
resources to name a few. Unfortunately, today, many on-campus food pantries are only for
particular days a week and for short periods. Improved allocation of monetary funds among the 23
CSU’s and the creation of on-campus gardens can help decrease the number of CSU students who
are food insecure. As well, we recommend a revaluation of federal poverty level limits for
households so that it be reflective of the current cost of living, which would increase the SNAP
benefits and federal and state cash aid students would be eligible to receive. Research must be
initiated on exploring the extent and trends of food insecurity among college students on state and
The CSU system is composed of 23 individual campuses and serves approximately 484
thousand students. Their system is considered the most extensive educational institutional network
in the nation that services the most ethnically, economically, and academically diverse students
(Crutchfield & Maguire, 2018). Moreover, the detail is vital in its alignment with the CSU system’s
mission to provide high-quality and affordable education to all students that meet the ever-
Although the mission statement aims to provide affordable education, it fails to do so, since
41.6% of CSU students reported facing food insecurity in 2018. Food insecurity placed them in
the position of choosing between their next meal and advancing their education (Crutchfield &
Maguire, 2018 & Humboldt State University, 2018). Furthermore, according to Guzman-Lopez
(2016), one in four CSU students were food insecure, which translated to 25% of the entire CSU
student body being food insecure at any given moment, which is an increase from previous years.
These statistics alone prove that food insecurity has become a significant and prevalent concern in
recent years, which requires immediate policy changes and evaluation of how the rising
educational and living expenses directly influence the food security of students (Guzman-Lopez,
2016).
Students that experience food insecurity is predominantly from the most vulnerable
populations, such as minority, first-generation LGBTQ communities, and former foster youth
groups (Humboldt State University, 2018). This statistical reality implies that students that come
from low-income backgrounds are more likely to be food insecure in college. Low food security
has been associated with a higher risk for lower academic performance and adverse health
outcomes (Crutchfield & Maguire, 2018). Students that suffer from hunger have been proven to
Policy Brief Paper Regarding Food Insecurity Among 5
have lower grades, low-class participation, and low attendance. Also, food insecurity is associated
with adverse health outcomes, which include headaches, mental health problems, low energy, and
trouble concentrating at school and home. Combating these adverse health outcomes will
Although there have already been policies put in place to prevent food insecurity on college
campuses, additional effective and strategic policies can be implemented to improve the
performance of CSU students and to eliminate their chances of being food insecure and hungry.
Each CSU campus has an emergency grant or fund that can be used to provide financial assistance
for students in need. All 23 CSU campuses currently offer a food pantry or some food distribution
program to help students obtain food in a time of need (Crutchfield & Maguire, 2018). Some of
the campuses accept Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) and participate in the Restaurant Meals
Program (RMP), which allows for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) dollars to
be used to purchase hot food on campus (Crutchfield & Maguire, 2018). It is surprising that with
these programs and policies in place, the percentage of hunger in CSU college students has still
risen over the years. Even though these programs have been beneficial to the CSU attending
students, they do not seem to do enough to eradicate the issue of food insecurity amongst college
students.
Although the Basic Needs initiative provides resources for students facing food insecurity,
the program fails to provide nutritional education resources for its students. Students who are
categorized as experiencing marginal food security or low food security are more likely to make
poor dietary choices because of their lack of nutrition education. These students often become
reliant on frozen meals found in the pantry, especially during their first year away from home
Policy Brief Paper Regarding Food Insecurity Among 6
(Abraham, S., Noriega, B. R., & Shin, J. Y. ,2018). Without these nutritional and educational
resources, students may continue to misuse the resources provided for them and therefore remain
food insecure. If nutrition education classes were incorporated as part of the food pantry, students
would be able to apply this knowledge and therefore make better food choices.
The CSU’s Basic Needs Initiative also lacks a fundamental structure. Every CSU offers
different resources, some more than others. One of the downfalls about the creation of the
Universities food pantries was the lack of faculty and staff to operate these pantries (Southern
California Public Radio, 2016). Some food pantries were only open a few times a week for minimal
hours. Universities, like the Channel Islands, had limited food resources and therefore required
students to fill out an extensive application to receive a bag of food. Other schools, much like The
Den at CSU San Bernardino, allow all students to receive food with no need for extensive
documentation. The Basic Needs Initiative should set requirements for all CSU food pantries to
Moreover, when discussing food pantry accessibility, California State University, Chico,
Northridge, Pomona, and San Bernardino offered the most help to their students. They often
provided vouchers that allow their students to receive free meals on campus. CSU campuses in
the Channel Islands, Fullerton, Los Angeles, Monterey Bay, and Sonoma offered the least help to
students who were food insecure (Southern California Public Radio, 2016). Although the Basic
Needs initiative provides funding for all schools, this policy failed to consider how food pantry
establishments operate at every university. Some university food pantries are more accessible than
others. Lack of food pantry accessibility may affect the student population’s health and their
endeavors at their university. The Basic Needs Initiative should distribute resources accordingly
Policy Brief Paper Regarding Food Insecurity Among 7
to the needs of every school. Every university's food pantry should be readily available for all
students.
Policy Recommendations
Since the conception of the United States of America, the United States government has
had the responsibility to ensure that the rights of its citizens are protected and not burdened by
others. The US Constitution declares that each has the unalienable rights to “life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness.” Students of color and low-income backgrounds are statistically unlikely to
obtain a higher education due to a series of barriers that still exist today, including social
determinants of health. When students find themselves in the difficult situation of having to go
without nutritious meals or skip them altogether, the government is directly failing to protect the
quality of life and pursuit of happiness of their students and their families. Moreover, when that
student lacks basic needs to survive, such as food and water, and is under significant amounts of
Many will find these challenges substantial and, ultimately, an impediment to obtaining a
higher education. Thus, when one more student drops-out of college, their career options, and
overall life financial expectancy of their offsprings plunges. Therefore, the government must
ensure that educational institutions across the country are providing the highest amounts of
opportunities to students, in particular, those from vulnerable and disadvantaged backgrounds, the
likelihood to succeed.
The educational success of each student is not just a legal obligation for the government, but
a financially and criminally sound one. Poverty has threatened the livelihood, health, and economic
stability of an individual and nation. Poverty directly influences the rate of societal crime, national
medical costs, spending habits of its citizens, and overall influential power of its government.
Policy Brief Paper Regarding Food Insecurity Among 8
Therefore, it is in the best interest of the country, to consider the implications their uneducated
We suggest the following policy recommendations to tackle the food poverty situation
among California State University’s student population. First, to allocate monetary funds of 45
million dollars to be divided among all CSU campuses over ten years. The funds would be used to
hire two full-time support staff to manage food pantries, seek out additional donors, increase the
awareness of food security among staff and faculty, increase student access to fresh produce, and
canned foods by increasing pantry hours of operation to seven days a week. Moreover, funding
will be used to allocate land to develop on-campus gardens, plant various types of fruit trees all
over campus, maintain a full-time gardener on staff, and provide nutritional educational resources.
CSU campuses such as Fresno, Northridge, San Bernardino, and San Jose already have success
The presence and student accessibility to a variety of fruit trees throughout campus provide
another way for students never to go hungry. It will not matter if the pantry was closed for the day
or if a student feels ashamed or uncomfortable to take advantage of campus pantry services, there
will be 24-hour access to a fruit tree throughout the year to pick. Second, revaluation of federal
poverty level limits for households must be updated and increased to be reflective of the actual
costs of living. The increase would directly increase the federal and state cash aid students receive,
also, to raise the SNAP monthly benefits for students and their families.
inalienable human rights are paramount to its legislation and societal frameworks. It is, therefore,
shocking and unacceptable that 41% of its California State University student body reported being
food insecure. It is the responsibility of the United States government to hold California and its
Policy Brief Paper Regarding Food Insecurity Among 9
fellow states accountable for food insecurity among its educational institutions. Policy
recommendations mentioned above are beginning to address food insecurity among California
students and enhance existing programs and influencing the food insecurity crisis among
References
Abraham, S., Noriega, B. R., & Shin, J. Y. (2018). College students eating habits and knowledge
http://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/college-students-eating-habits-and-knowledge-
of-nutritional-requirements-9188.html
Crutchfield, R., & Maguire, J. (2018). Study Of Student Basic Needs. 53. Retrieved from
https://www2.calstate.edu/impact-of-the-csu/student-success/basic-needs-
initiative/Documents/BasicNeedsStudy_phaseII_withAccessibilityComments.pdf
system/news/Documents/10487-Basic-Needs-Flyer.pdf
objectives/topic/social-determinants-health/interventions-resources/food-insecurity
Guzman-Lopez, A. (2016, February 26, Nearly 1 in 4 Cal State students go hungry, a new report
https://www.scpr.org/news/2016/02/26/57993/new-report-nearly-one-out-of-four-cal-
state-studen/
Humboldt State University. (2018, April 18). An Unprecedented Look at CSU Students' Food
http://now.humboldt.edu/news/an-unprecedented-look-at-csu-students-food-and-housing-
insecurity/
assistance/food-security-in-the-us/measurement.aspx
Policy Brief Paper Regarding Food Insecurity Among 11
Southern California Public Radio. (2016, November 16). 1 in 4 Cal State students go hungry, a
report-nearly-one-out-of-four-cal-state-studen/
https://hungerandhealth.feedingamerica.org/understand-food-insecurity/