Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 2 of 4
During modeling, Brooke provided Students contributed to their learning by
It is always good to have a second
students with a handout that explained responding when the teacher called on them
set of eyes in the classroom to
what she was modeling (how to use – even if they weren’t completely confident.
see things I can’t when I am
Google sheets). She also continually Students also participated by asking
helping students. I did notice that
checked in with students to make sure she questions as the teacher was modeling and
FS#3 was slightly off task during
wasn’t moving too quickly (thumbs letting the teacher know when they needed
independent work. This is
up/thumbs down). When students were additional support to complete the task.
CSTP 1: Engaging All
common. I redirected him by
Students
working independently, Brooke walked asking about his answers and
In what ways were students around the room to check that students FS #1 was engaged for most of the lesson.
engaging in conversations where I
engaged? How were were on task and clarify any confusion. As He participated in the engagement activity
students not engaged? made personal connections to
How did students contribute students graphed data, Brooke allowed and other academic tasks but was visibly a
the stocks he choose. This way, if
to their learning? conversations in case students needed little discouraged during learning how to
How did teacher and/or he continued to talk to students
peer tutoring as she also circulated to offer navigate sheets as the teacher modeled. He
students monitor learning? when I walked away maybe he’d
How were the focus support. did ask for help when the teacher walked
students engaged and talk about the assignment. I
around the room to assist.
supported throughout the supported FS#1 by going through
lesson?
each step with him that I
FS #2 participated in all tasks and was able
modeled previously in the lesson.
to stay engaged and keep up to speed as the
I watched him do it and stood by
teacher modeled how to use Google sheets.
for support.
FS #3 was mostly engaged, but did need to
be redirected by the teacher during
independent work.
Students followed the norms of the class
This class has evident norms and behaviors Students in this class are mature
very well. It is obvious this is a 12th grade
for both independent and group work. and very respectful of norms and
CSTP 2: Effective Learning class, as students demonstrate qualities of
There is a sense of community and respect each other. This lesson was
Environment older high school students. Students are
How did students and among peers. Brooke gives very clear delivered toward the end of the
respectful toward each other, outside of the
teacher contribute to an information about expectations with time, semester, so students have been
effective learning occasional jabs about stock performance,
environment? noise, conversations and peer support. working together and practicing
which are technically “on task” for this
social responsibility together for
lesson.
the past 3-4 months.
Brooke used a lot of informal checks for Students constructed knowledge of the
I am glad students can lean on
understanding through walking around subject matter over the series of lessons in
each other for support with
and calling out for thumbs up/down as she their Google sheets document. In this lesson,
classroom tasks, because it gives
modeled. She clearly knew which students students constructed knowledge by referring
CSTP 3: Organizing
me an opportunity to support
were struggling because she worked with to their collected data and working together
Subject Matter students who need more one on
What actions of the NT
them immediately following modeling. She and with the teacher in creating and adding
one guidance. Housing data in
contributed to student also provided multiple methods of to their document. Students also conducted
assimilation of subject and using Google sheets was new
instructional delivery. For the portions she research as they used the internet to find
matter? for most of the students in my
How did students construct modeled, she also provided a handout historical data on their stock performance.
knowledge of subject class. I found that we spent more
with explanations and pictures. This lesson When students struggled, they asked for
matter? time on learning how to do this
What misconceptions did was the culmination of the series and the help. Depending on the level of difficulty,
students have and how during the lesson series than I
teacher contributed to assimilation of they’d ask the teacher or a peer. Some
were they addressed by initially anticipated. I had to
the teacher? subject matter by prompting students to reached out to peers for help with setting up
adjust the time in the lesson to
house data in their folders and in their their data table, and reached out to the
make up for the lack of
Google sheets document. They referred teacher with deeper content knowledge
experience that I wasn’t
back to this data as they completed the questions.
expecting.
final project for the series.
Because this is a 12th grade class,
students do feel comfortable
Brooke provided handouts with explicit Students seemed to enjoy researching and asking for help and peer tutoring.
instructions and modeled new tasks so comparing their stock performance. They We have also established the
that students could follow along and ask supported each other in manipulating
CSTP 4: Learning expectation that if there is
for help as they needed it. She also offered Google sheets and setting up the varied
Experiences conversation in class it is
How were students students the opportunity for peer tutoring functions. Students participated by assignment-related and that peer
supported through during independent work. Her application completing the assigned tasks and asking
differentiated instruction? tutoring is acceptable. I think
How did students activity mirrored her engagement activity, questions as needed. there was high student
participate? so questions weren’t new to students and
How did the NT contribute participation in this lesson
to student learning? the mirroring helped them analyze the
because the company stocks
difference between what they thought
were chosen by the students, so
they knew and what they learned from
they had a personal connection
gathering even more data in this lesson.
to the research. Also, because we
had been doing this over time,
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 3 of 4
students were more invested
than a one-off activity.
Something I realized in the
assessment portion of this lesson
was that some students still
aren’t comfortable with
ambiguity in data or in possible
The lesson assessment piece asked
solutions. I realized students have
CSTP 5: Assessing Student students to determine which stock(s)
Learning mostly been taught to come up
performed best and worst and determine Some students were excited to display and
How did students with the correct answer, but not
demonstrate achievement factors that may have cause this. The communicate how well their stocks
that the correct answer could be
of lesson objectives? assessment was aligned to both the performed. Some students struggled to
In what ways did students to explore more data and that
struggle or demonstrate overarching objective of the lesson series explain why their stocks may not have
there isn’t one solution. The final
limited understanding? and this individual lesson. The teacher performed well.
What teacher actions assignment asks students to
contributed to student helped struggling students by asking
explore some causal factors.
achievement? probing questions about stock
Some of this is easy to deduce
performance indicators.
based on previous class activities
and readings, but this also asks
students to think more abstractly
and come up with further
questions.
Section 4: Post Observation Conference
To what degree did students
achieve lesson objectives? Each of the students in the class was able to achieve near mastery or higher on the final assignment of this lesson series.
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
FS#1 was able to achieve near mastery
To what degree did focus FS#3 achieved mastery on this
on this activity. He was able to
students achieve lesson FS#2 followed all directions completely assignment. This student was able to
objectives? complete the assignment fully, but
and achieved exceeds mastery. follow directions and answer all
missed a few parts of the critical
questions completely.
thinking questions.
Next time I teach this lesson I would better prepare my students by introducing Google sheets earlier in the semester. I
What would you do differently
next time?
made the mistake of assuming students were more proficient with Google sheets. Luckily I was able to make adjustments
throughout the lesson series to compensate for this.
One of the strength of this lesson is the norms that are set up in the class. Students feel safe to ask questions of me and
each other. They also respect each other. Another success of this lesson was that I modeled the use of Google sheets. One
What were three top Lesson of my professional goals is to model more, so in this lesson that was important for me. It also allowed me to help students
Strengths? in real time. I was able to pause and check for understanding then differentiate accordingly. Another strength of this lesson
is that students were engaged in the content. They were genuinely interested in how their stocks performed and even
when they didn’t do well, they wanted to figure out why.
One of the areas of improvement for this lesson is that students struggled to think outside of the assignment. They were
not comfortable with multiple answers or causal factors. Next time I teach this lesson I’ll also incorporate skills in
What were three top areas for computational thinking and being comfortable with ambiguity. Next time I teach this lesson I would also make it more fun
improvement? and engaging by incorporating “jag bucks” or some type of fake currency so that students had a tangible experience. I might
even have a student or group of students act as a bank. Another area of improvement would be to use Google forms for al
self-assessment across the unit.
Next steps in my teaching include integrating more computational thinking activities. I realized the need for students to
develop a tolerance for ambiguity and comfort in abstract thinking. While this assignment does call for some direct
What are next steps? responses, I think students could have gained an even deeper understanding of the content if they were more skilled in
computational thinking. One of my stretch goals for next semester is to develop computational thinking activities for each
unit.
Other Comments/Notes
In the Spring ILP, I noted that I wanted to incorporate and teach self-assessment more explicitly in this POP Cycle. I feel like I was able to accomplish
that with this lesson series. Last semester I started working toward this goal and incorporating more opportunities to assess and measure growth by
explicitly reading/dissecting the learning target. I was able to incorporate self-assessment in this lesson series, both informally and formally, in
conversations with students and carving time for progress reflection in exit tickets and notebook entries.
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4 of 4
Teacher: Subject(s): Unit: Lesson(s):
Brooke Bern Economics Stock Market Stock Market Analysis Series
Content Standard(s) Lesson Series Objective
12.2 Students analyze the elements of America’s market 12.2 Students analyze the elements of America’s market
economy in a global setting. economy in a global setting.
Learning Target:
I can determine the role of stock in a corporation and explain the difference between common and preferred stock.
TWPS:
- Why is the baby upset that Toys R Us is closing?
- What do you think “Play-Doh futures” might mean?
- What does “diversify” mean?
- Take notes
Exit Ticket:
After learning about the relationship between stocks, a corporation,
Application
Learning Target:
I can provide a history of the NYSE and choose 5 companies I’d like to “invest” in.
TWPS:
Engagement
create a tab titled “Company Profiles” and another tab titled “Stock
Performance”.
Exit Ticket:
Why do you think the companies you chose are a good investment?
Application
Lesson 3 of 4
Learning Target:
I can explain some of the impacts on the stock market and offer possible explanations for the current performance of
my chosen stocks.
TWPS:
Engagement
SW log current date and stock value for each company in Google Sheet
tab “Stock Performance”
Formative Assessment:
If you bought stock in a company in the paper supply or office supply
industry, when might you predict you’ll see spikes in value?
Application
Student will check and log stocks three more dates over two weeks.
Lesson 4 of 4
Learning Target: I can compare stock performance over time, using Google sheets, and analyze possible contributions
to performance outcomes.
TWPS:
Which of your stocks performed the best over the course of the unit? Do you
think it was a good investment? Which performed the worst? Would you
Engagement
TW ask this question again later after students have reviewed 1 year
stock performance.
TW model how to search stock value over the course of varying Chromebooks
increments of time. How-To search and read stock value
Stock Analysis handout
TW model how to add columns between columns in Google sheets.
think it was a good investment? Which performed the worst? Would you
invest in that stock again?