Sie sind auf Seite 1von 7

PROJECT :

CLIENT :
JOB NO. : DATE :
Sheet Pile Wall, with Tieback Anchors, Design Based on AASHTO (HB-17), 2018 IBC & ACI 318-14
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
HEIGHT OF CANTILEVER Hcant = 18 ft
SURCHARGE WEIGHT ws = 500 psf
ALLOWABLE LATERAL SOIL-BEARING PRESSURE IN EMBEDMENT
Pp = 300 psf / ft
LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE Pa = 35 pcf (equivalent fluid pressure)
SEISMIC GROUND SHAKING PE = 450 psf / ft (for Hcant > 12 ft only)

SOIL SPECIFIC WEIGHT gb = 110 pcf


CONCRETE STRENGTH fc ' = 4 ksi
VERT. REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
PILE DIAMETER D = 44 in
PILE SPACING S = 4.0333 ft, o.c.
PILE VERT. REINF. 16 # 11
LATERAL REINF. OPTION (0=Spirals, 1=Ties) 1 Ties
LATERAL REINFORCEMENT # 6 @ 8 in o.c.

TIEBACK ANCHOR a = 20 deg, Slope to horizontal THE SHORING DESI


Tb = 230 kips / anchor, SD, from Soil Report, or AASHTO Tab 5.7.6.2 ( Hembd =
Sv = 9 ft, o.c., vertical , Sh = 4 ft, o.c., horizontal

ANALYSIS
DETERMINE PILE SECTION FORCES AT CANTILEVER BOTTOM
Hb = 0.5 S Pa (Hcant)2 = 22.87 kips, ASD
Hs = ws S Pa (Hcant) / gb = 11.55 kips, ASD
HE = 0.5 S PE (Hcant) = 2
294.03 kips, ASD
HTieback = Tb (Cos a) S (Hcant) / (Sv Sh) = 435.86 kips, SD
P = S D ws + 0.25 p gc D Hcant =
2
35.90 kips, ASD
V = Hb + HE + Hs = 328.45 kips, ASD
M = (Hb /3 + 2HE /3 + Hs /2 ) Hcant = 2922.1 ft-kips, ASD

Pu = 1.2 P = 43.09 kips, SD


Vu = MAX ( 0, 1.6 V - HTieback ) = 89.66 kips, SD
Mu = MAX ( 0, 1.6 M - 0.5 HTieback )= 752.6 ft-kips, SD
CHECK PILE LIMITATIONS
fc ' = 4 ksi > 4 ksi [Satisfactory]
D= 44 in > MAX[( Hcant + Hembd) / 30 , 12 in] [Satisfactory]

CHECK FLEXURAL & AXIAL CAPACITY

 
 2  f C'


o  or ,  max  , E c
  Ec 
 
       2 
  f C  2  c    c   , fo
'

fC    o    o  
  '
  f C , for  c   o
 s E s , for  s   t
fS
 f y , for  s   t
Pn
8000
Pu / f = 47.9 kips, (213 kN)
7000
Mnc @ Pu / f = 1405.7 ft-kips, (1906 kN-m)
6000
> M u
/ f = 836.2
5000 [Satisfactory]
4000 where f= 0.900 , (ACI 318-14 21.2)
d = 39.545 in, (ACI 20.6)
3000

2000

1000
Mn
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Solid Line - Tension Controlled
-1000
Dash Line - Compression Controlled
-2000

CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY


f Vn = f (Vs + Vc) = 312 kips, (ACI 318-14 22.5)
> Vu [Satisfactory]
where f = 0.75 (ACI 318 21.2)
A0 = 1228 in2. Av = 0.88 in2. fy = 60
Vc = 2 (fc') A0 =
0.5
155.4 kips, (ACI 318-14 22.5)
Vs = MIN (d fy Av / s , 8 (fc')0.5A0) = 261.0 kips, (ACI 318-14 22.5.1)
smax = 12 (IBC 1810.3.9.4.2) sprovd = 8
smin = 1
rs = 0.12 fc' / fyt = 0.008 < rs,provd = 0.008 [Satisfactory] (ACI 318-14 18.13.4.3 & 18.7.5.1)

DETERMINE PILE EMBEDMENT LENGTH, Hembd, (IBC 1807.3)


By trials, use pole depth, d = Hembd = 16.77 ft
Lateral bearing @ bottom, S3 = 2 Pp Min( d , 12' ) = 7.20 ksf
Lateral bearing @ d / 3, S1 = 2 Pp Min( d / 3 , 12' ) = 3.37 ksf
Require Depth is given by
A 4.36h 
d 1  1   for nonconstrained 
2 A 
16.77 ft [Satisfactory]

Where P=V = 328.45 kips


A= 2.34 P / (D S1) = 10.63
h =M / V = 8.90 ft
PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :
8 IBC & ACI 318-14

THE SHORING DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.


( Hembd = 16.77 ft. Min. Req'D)
(IBC Table 1808.8.1)
(IBC 1810.3.5.2)

 f C'  
,  max  , E c  57 f C' , E s  29000ksi
Ec 

      2 
 2  c    c   , for 0   c   o
   o    o  
, for  c   o

s , for  s   t
, for  s   t
(cont'd)

ft-kips, (1906 kN-m)


ft-kips, (1134 kN-m)

, (ACI 318-14 21.2)


in, (ACI 20.6)

ksi

in
[Satisfactory]
14 18.13.4.3 & 18.7.5.1)
PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 0 no P
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 56.04 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE h= 8.896614 ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING b= 3.666667 ft h
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.3 ksf / ft
ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 09 1806.3.4) F= 2
FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> d = 36 ft

Use 3.66666666666667 ft dia x 16.77 ft deep footing unrestrained @ ground level d

ANALYSIS

LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3  FS Min  d , 12 ' 


LATERAL BEARING @ d/3 : d 
S 1  FS Min  , 12 ' 
3 
2.34 P
A
bS 1
A 4.36h 
 1  1   , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
REQUIRD DEPTH : 2  A 
d 
 4.25 Ph , FOR CONSTRAINED
 bS 3

NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED
LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 56.04 k 56.04 k
HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE h => 8.9 ft 8.9 ft
DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING b => 3.67 ft 3.67 ft
LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.60 ksf / ft 0.60 ksf / ft

1ST TRIAL TRY d1 => 36.00 ft 36.00 ft


LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 7.20 ksf 7.20 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.20 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 4.97 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 9.85 ft 8.96 ft

2ND TRIAL : TRY d2=> 22.93 ft 22.48 ft


LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.59 ksf 4.50 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.20 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 7.80 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 13.43 ft 8.96 ft

3RD TRIAL : TRY d3=> 18.18 ft 15.72 ft


LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 3.64 ksf 3.14 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.20 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 9.84 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 15.85 ft 8.96 ft

4TH TRIAL : TRY d4=> 17.02 ft 12.34 ft


LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 3.40 ksf 2.47 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 7.20 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 10.51 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 16.63 ft 8.96 ft

5TH TRIAL : TRY d5=> 16.83 ft 10.65 ft


LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 3.37 ksf 2.13 ksf
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 7.20 ksf 6.39 ksf
CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 10.63 - -
REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 16.77 ft 9.51 ft