Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Case 4-3
Purpose of the case
The purpose of this case is to provide you with an opportunity to work with IFRS 10
Consolidated Financial Statements. The requirement is very directive, asking you to examine
the specific clauses of a franchise agreement to determine if control exists. The answer is not
immediately obvious, since ownership by the parent is much less than 50%, and there are no
convertible preferred shares outstanding or signed shareholder agreements in place. You must
look further to decide whether the details of the franchise agreement give FOD (Burnaby)
control over the franchisee. Control has the following three elements:
(a) the investor has power over the investee to direct the relevant activities.
(b) the investor has exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the
investee and
(c) the investor has the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the
investor’s returns.
All three elements must be met for the investor to have control.
Discussion
Factory Optical Distributors (FOD) (Burnaby) owns 35% of the franchise operation’s outstanding
common shares. No other equity instruments can be issued. Thus control does not exist based
on share ownership or ownership of convertible rights, options, or warrants. As well, there is no
evidence of an irrevocable shareholder agreement conferring control to either party.
The following specifics of the franchise agreement suggest that the franchisee may not control
the franchisees:
The franchisee has clear voting control based on common share ownership. The
franchisee is in charge of day-to-day operations and thereby determines the following:
o quality of services provided to the customer
o other products and services to be offered to the public
o selling price of products and services
The decision as to whether or not the franchisees are controlled by FOD is one of professional
judgment. Some of you may feel that given FOD's control of financing and operating policies,
and exposure to similar business risks, a subsidiary does exist. Others may feel that the factors
discussed in the case do not provide sufficient evidence, and a subsidiary does not exist. As
supported by above discussion, a subsidiary does exist and consolidation would be appropriate.
Note: There is no right or wrong answer to this case. A good discussion will raise all of the
issues, and will allow you to formulate your own opinions based on professional judgment.
Allocated: FV - CA
Inventory (26,000 – 21,000) $5,000
Plant (60,000 – 51,000) 9,000
Trademarks (14,000 – 7,000) 7,000
21,000
Long-term debt (19,000 – 20,000) 1,000 22,000
Balance: goodwill $15,000
Par Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
January 1, Year 2
Case 2
Allocated: FV – CA
Inventory $5,000
Plant 9,000
Trademarks 7,000
21,000
Long-term debt 1,000 22,000
Goodwill $15,000
Par Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
January 1, Year 2
Case 3
Allocated: FV – CA
Inventory $5,000
Plant 9,000
Trademarks 7,000
21,000
Long-term debt 1,000 22,000
Goodwill $ –0–
Par Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
January 1, Year 2
Case 4
Allocated: FV – CA
Inventory $5,000
Plant 9,000
Trademarks 7,000
21,000
Long-term debt 1,000 22,000
Negative goodwill (10,000)
Recognized in income – gain on bargain purchase 10,000
Goodwill $–0–
Par Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
January 1, Year 2
Cash (100,000 – 70,000 + 2,000) $32,000
Accounts receivable (25,000 + 7,000) 32,000
Inventory (30,000 + 21,000 + 5,000) 56,000
Plant (175,000 + 51,000 + 9,000) 235,000
Trademarks (0 + 7,000 + 7,000) 14,000
Copyright 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved.
6 Modern Advanced Accounting in Canada, Eighth Edition
$369,000
Case 5
There is -ive GW if the implied value, 70,000, is less than FV of net assets, 80,000.
Cost of 90% investment $63,000
Carrying amount of Sub Ltd.’s net assets
Assets $88,000
Liabilities 30,000
Controlling interest 90% x 58,000 52,200
Acquisition differential 10,800
Allocated: FV - CA
Inventory $5,000
Plant 9,000
Trademarks 7,000
21,000
Long-term debt 1,000
Controlling interest 90% x 22,000 19,800
Negative goodwill – calculated using PCET (9,000)
Recognized in income 9,000
Goodwill $ –0–
Par Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
January 1, Year 2
Problem 4-3
(a)
Cost of 90% investment – use PCET to calculate -ive GW. $52,200
Implied value of 100% investment (52,200/0.9) 58,000
Carrying amount of Seeview Co.’s net assets
Assets $94,650
Liabilities 67,700
26,950
Acquisition differential 31,050
Allocated: FV – CA
Inventory $1,900
Plant assets 10,050
Intangible assets 3,800
Contract with Bardier (FV of identifiable asset) 23,000
38,750
Long-term debt 6,300 45,050
Negative goodwill (14,000)
Gain on bargain purchase – To RE on consol. BS 14,000
Goodwill $–0–
Allocated: FV – CA
Inventory $1,900
Plant assets 10,050
Intangible assets 3,800
Contract with Bardier (FV of identifiable asset) 23,000
38,750
Long-term debt 6,300
45,050
Controlling interest 90% 40,545
= 10% x 72,000
= 7,200
JOURNAL ENTRIES
5 Inventory 1,900
Plant assets 10,050
Intangible assets 3,800
Customer contract 23,000
Long-term debt 6,300
Gain on bargain purchase 12,600
Acquisition differential 32,450
To allocate the acquisition differential
(b) The three consolidated accounts that are not equal to the sum of the carrying amounts of
the parent and the subsidiary are plant and equipment, goodwill and inventory.
Goodwill
Consolidated amount $183,000
Blue’s carrying amount 0
Fair value of Joy’s goodwill $183,000
Inventory
Consolidated amount $353,000
Blue’s carrying amount 109,000
Fair value of Joy’s inventory $244,000
Problem 4-6
(a) Parent company extension theory
Cost of 70% investment (350 shares × $40) $14,000
Carrying amount of J’s net assets
Assets 105,000
Liabilities (75,000)
E’s share 70% x 30,000 21,000
E Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, Year 6
E Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, Year 6
(a)
Cost of 80% of Donna $328,000
Implied value of 100% of Donna $410,000
Carrying amount of Donna’s net assets
Assets $297,600
Liabilities 102,000
195,600
Acquisition differential 214,400
Allocated: FV – CA
Accounts receivable $(4,400)
Inventory 19,800
Plant 30,800
Trademarks 34,000
Patents 35,600
Domain names 54,000
Long-term debt (8,000) 161,800
Goodwill $52,600
Prima Ltd
Consolidated Balance Sheet
January 1, Year 6
(b)
If an independent business valuator valued the NCI at $76,000, NCI would be reported at
$76,000 rather than $82,000 and goodwill would be reported at $46,600 rather than $52,600.
(This is because FV of acquisition will be the consideration paid of $328,000 plus NCI $76,000,
which will change amount of GW calculated.)
(c)
PRIMA LTD.
Balance Sheet
January 1, Year 6
Cash (374,000 - 328,000) $ 46,000
Accounts receivable 84,000
Inventory 100,000
Investment in Donna Corp. 328,000
Plant 514,000
Patents 104,000
$1,176,000
PRIMA LTD.
Copyright 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved.
Solutions Manual, Chapter 4 17
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
December 31, Year 5
Eliminations
PRIMA DONNA Dr. Cr. Consolidated
JOURNAL ENTRIES