Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Asia
1. Vietnam, by William J. Duiker. 1989. Out of print. See No. 27.
2. Bangladesh, 2nd ed., by Craig Baxter and Syedur Rahman. 1996. Out of
print. See No. 48.
3. Pakistan, by Shahid Javed Burki. 1991. Out of print. See No. 33.
4. Jordan, by Peter Gubser. 1991.
5. Afghanistan, by Ludwig W. Adamec. 1991. Out of print. See No. 47.
6. Laos, by Martin Stuart-Fox and Mary Kooyman. 1992. Out of print. See No. 35.
7. Singapore, by K. Mulliner and Lian The-Mulliner. 1991.
8. Israel, by Bernard Reich. 1992.
9. Indonesia, by Robert Cribb. 1992. Out of print. See No. 51.
10. Hong Kong and Macau, by Elfed Vaughan Roberts, Sum Ngai Ling, and
Peter Bradshaw. 1992.
11. Korea, by Andrew C. Nahm. 1993. Out of print. See No. 52.
12. Taiwan, by John F. Copper. 1993. Out of print. See No. 34.
13. Malaysia, by Amarjit Kaur. 1993. Out of print. See No. 36.
14. Saudi Arabia, by J. E. Peterson. 1993. Out of print. See No. 45.
15. Myanmar, by Jan Becka. 1995. Out of print. See No. 59.
16. Iran, by John H. Lorentz. 1995.
17. Yemen, by Robert D. Burrowes. 1995.
18. Thailand, by May Kyi Win and Harold Smith. 1995. Out of print.
See No. 55.
19. Mongolia, by Alan J. K. Sanders. 1996. Out of print. See No. 42.
20. India, by Surjit Mansingh. 1996. Out of print. See No. 58.
21. Gulf Arab States, by Malcolm C. Peck. 1996.
22. Syria, by David Commins. 1996. Out of print. See No. 50.
23. Palestine, by Nafez Y. Nazzal and Laila A. Nazzal. 1997.
24. Philippines, by Artemio R. Guillermo and May Kyi Win. 1997. Out of print.
See No. 54.
Oceania
1. Australia, by James C. Docherty. 1992. Out of print. See No. 32.
2. Polynesia, by Robert D. Craig. 1993. Out of print. See No. 39.
3. Guam and Micronesia, by William Wuerch and Dirk Ballendorf. 1994.
4. Papua New Guinea, by Ann Turner. 1994. Out of print. See No. 37.
5. New Zealand, by Keith Jackson and Alan McRobie. 1996. Out of print.
See No. 56.
27. Vietnam, 2nd ed., by William J. Duiker. 1998. Out of print. See No. 57.
28. People’s Republic of China: 1949–1997, by Lawrence R. Sullivan, with
the assistance of Nancy Hearst. 1998.
29. Afghanistan, 2nd ed., by Ludwig W. Adamec. 1997. Out of print.
See No. 47.
30. Lebanon, by As’ad AbuKhalil. 1998.
31. Azerbaijan, by Tadeusz Swietochowski and Brian C. Collins. 1999.
32. Australia, 2nd ed., by James C. Docherty. 1999.
33. Pakistan, 2nd ed., by Shahid Javed Burki. 1999.
34. Taiwan (Republic of China), 2nd ed., by John F. Copper. 2000.
35. Laos, 2nd ed., by Martin Stuart-Fox. 2001.
36. Malaysia, 2nd ed., by Amarjit Kaur. 2001.
37. Papua New Guinea, 2nd ed., by Ann Turner. 2001.
38. Tajikistan, by Kamoludin Abdullaev and Shahram Akbarzedeh. 2002.
39. Polynesia, 2nd ed., by Robert D. Craig. 2002.
40. North Korea, by Ilpyong J. Kim. 2003.
41. Armenia, by Rouben Paul Adalian. 2002.
42. Mongolia, 2nd ed., by Alan J. K. Sanders. 2003.
43. Cambodia, by Justin Corfield and Laura Summers. 2003.
44. Iraq, by Edmund A. Ghareeb with the assistance of Beth K. Dougherty.
2004.
45. Saudi Arabia, 2nd ed., by J. E. Peterson. 2003.
46. Nepal, by Nanda R. Shrestha and Keshav Bhattarai. 2003.
47. Afghanistan, 3rd ed., by Ludwig W. Adamec. 2003.
48. Bangladesh, 3rd ed., by Craig Baxter and Syedur Rahman. 2003.
49. Kyrgyzstan, by Rafis Abazov. 2004.
50. Syria, 2nd ed., by David Commins. 2004.
51. Indonesia, 2nd ed., by Robert Cribb and Audrey Kahin. 2004.
52. Republic of Korea, 2nd ed., by Andrew C. Nahm and James E. Hoare.
2004.
53. Turkmenistan, by Rafis Abazov. 2005.
54. Philippines, 2nd ed., by Artemio Guillermo. 2005.
55. Thailand, 2nd ed., by Harold E. Smith, Gayla S. Nieminen, and May Kyi
Win. 2005.
56. New Zealand, 2nd ed., by Keith Jackson and Alan McRobie. 2005.
57. Vietnam, 3rd ed., by Bruce Lockhart and William J. Duiker, 2006.
58. India, 2nd ed., by Surjit Mansingh, 2006.
59. Burma (Myanmar), by Donald M. Seekins, 2006.
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page iii
Historical Dictionary of
Burma (Myanmar)
Donald M. Seekins
PO Box 317
Oxford
OX2 9RU, UK
Contents
v
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page vi
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page vii
Editor’s Foreword
When Burma first became independent, there were valid reasons to ex-
pect it to be a relative success in the region. It was well endowed with
natural resources, reasonably compact, and had some talented leaders
with broad public support. Yet while its neighbors are presently known
for political progress and occasionally economic “miracles,” Burma has
slipped back and become a rare laggard and even sometimes a pariah.
Politically, it is run by one of the world’s few remaining military
regimes, which stubbornly rejects any democratization that could un-
dermine its control. Economically, the situation has continued to
worsen, for the bulk of the population at least, while any wealth is mo-
nopolized by a small elite, and the greatest source of riches is drugs.
This can hardly be compensated for by superficial reforms or name
changes—from Burma to Myanmar—or promises of better times to
come. Nor can it be justified by the past, although it is somewhat easier
to understand today against the background of yesterday, a long history
marked by many problems that are yet to be resolved.
Although it is simple enough to say in an offhanded way what has
gone wrong, it is not that easy to explain it more cogently. That re-
quires countless details, without which it is difficult to make sense of
the situation. It is because of the details that this Historical Dictionary
of Burma (Myanmar) must be welcomed. It provides an exceptional
overview of the country, both today and yesterday, and also perhaps
clues about tomorrow. The dictionary section has hundreds of entries
on notable leaders throughout history, the more significant events that
shaped that history, and the groups and institutions that currently pre-
vail. Other entries look into the economy, society, culture, and religion
as well as its many different ethnic groups. This admittedly complex
situation is summed up in the introduction and also traced over the
centuries in the chronology. The bibliography points to other sources
vii
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page viii
Jon Woronoff
Series Editor
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page ix
Acknowledgments
ix
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page x
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page xi
Reader’s Notes
xi
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page xii
San Suu Kyi, Ma Thida. Many ethnic minorities have their own titles.
For example, a Mon woman will be addressed as Mi (the equivalent of
Daw or Ma) before her name, a Mon man as Nai (the equivalent of U).
In the entries, the honorific is not reflected in the alphabetical arrange-
ment.
Certain persons, for example, Bogyoke Aung San, have special titles,
in this case meaning literally “major general.” The term Thakin (“mas-
ter”) is often used in front of the names of persons who were involved
in the struggle for independence, for example, Thakin Mya, Thakin Ko-
daw Hmaing. Buddhist monks have their own terms of address, for ex-
ample, pongyi, sayadaw. Saya, meaning “teacher” (for women,
sayama), is often used to address not only teachers, professors, or
physicians but also adult persons who because of their skill or experi-
ence are deemed worthy of this title.
A source of confusion for both speakers of Burmese and of Western
languages is the large number of persons who (though unrelated) have
the same or similar names. For example, there are three prominent “Tin
Oos” (or two “Tin Oos” and one “Tin U”) in modern Burmese history:
to differentiate between them, they are given prefixes in a manner fre-
quently resorted to by Burmese people: “MI Tin Oo” was the director
of Military Intelligence until he was purged in 1983; “S-2 Tin Oo” was
a member of the State Law and Order Restoration Council/State Peace
and Development Council, with the office of Secretary-2; and “NLD
Tin U” is a former defense minister who now occupies a leadership po-
sition within the National League for Democracy.
The terms “Burman” and “Burmese” are also confusing (both are part
of the old nomenclature; the post-1989 equivalents are “Bamar” and
“Myanmar”). During the colonial period, the British used these terms
interchangeably. But in most postcolonial era writing, the former refers
to the dominant ethnic group, while the latter refers to nationals of the
country regardless of ethnicity. Thus, a Karen could be described as
“Burmese,” though in fact many members of this group, and other mi-
nority groups as well, insist on being identified specifically as members
of their own community as distinct from the “Burmese.” In other words,
in certain contexts, “Burman” and “Burmese” remain synonymous.
Burma’s currency is the kyat (approximately pronounced “chat”),
which because of the country’s economic weaknesses has steadily de-
preciated against the U.S. dollar on the free market. In 2005, the kyat
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page xiv
(abbreviated K) was over 1,000 to the dollar on the free market. There
is, however, an official exchange rate, which has remained steady at
around K6.00 ⫽ US$1.00 for many years. Fortunately, foreign visitors
to the country with hard currency can take advantage of the free market
rate.
In November 2005, the State Peace and Development Council com-
menced the relocation of civil servants to Pyinmana, in the central part
of the country, where the junta has been constructing a heavily fortified
compound that will serve as their new military headquarters (the “War
Office”) and a new national capital, replacing Rangoon (Yangon). The
capital’s relocation caught both Burmese and foreign observers by sur-
prise, and it seems to indicate a determination by the military elite to
isolate themselves not only from foreign countries, but also from their
own people, in the event that there is a repetition of the massive
prodemocracy demonstrations of 1988.
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page xv
Old New
Burma Myanmar
Union of Burma Union of Myanmar
Akyab (Sittwe) Sittway
Arakan State Rakhine State
Arakan Yoma Rakhine Yoma
Ava Inwa
Bassein Pathein
Bassein River Pathein River
Chindwin River Chindwinn River
Irrawaddy Delta Ayeyarwady Delta
Irrawaddy Division Ayeyarwady Division
Irrawaddy River Ayeyarwady River
Karen State Kayin State
Keng Tung (Kengtung) Kyaingtong
Kyaukpyu Kyaukphyu
Magwe Magway
Magwe Division Magway Division
Maymyo Pyin U Lwin
Mergui Myeik, Beik
Mergui Archipelago Myeik (Beik) Archipelago
Moulmein Mawlamyine
Pa-an Hpa-an
Pagan Bagan
Pegu Bago
xv
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page xvi
xvii
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page xviii
Chronology
xxiii
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page xxiv
xxiv • CHRONOLOGY
CHRONOLOGY • xxv
xxvi • CHRONOLOGY
1945 March 27: Aung San leads rising of Burma National Army
against Japanese; anniversary known as Resistance Day/Armed
Forces Day. May: Rangoon, evacuated by Japanese, recaptured by
Allies.
1947 January 27: Aung San-Attlee Agreement signed. February 12:
Panglong Agreement concluded by Aung San and Frontier Area Lead-
ers (anniversary is Union Day). July 19: Aung San and members of his
Interim Government cabinet assassinated. October 17: Nu-Attlee
Agreement signed.
CHRONOLOGY • xxvii
xxviii • CHRONOLOGY
CHRONOLOGY • xxix
xxx • CHRONOLOGY
CHRONOLOGY • xxxi
under arrest. May 6: Daw Suu Kyi released from house arrest; between
then and May 2003 makes eight trips upcountry to meet with NLD lo-
cal branches. December 5: Death of Ne Win, little or no coverage in of-
ficial press; no state funeral.
2003 May 30: Pro-regime mob attacks Aung San Suu Kyi and her
NLD supporters during upcountry trip, in Sagaing Division (“Black Fri-
day” incident); many believed killed; she is placed under house arrest
for third time after being imprisoned; the dialogue process is at an end.
2004 May 17: National Convention reconvenes. October 18: Khin
Nyunt, prime minister (since 2003) and head of Military Intelligence, is
arrested, accused of corruption and trying to split the armed forces; his
MI subordinates also arrested or retired; “hard liner” General Soe Win
becomes new prime minister.
2005 Growing movement within ASEAN to persuade Burma to relin-
quish chairmanship of ASEAN when its turn comes in 2006. February
17: National Convention reconvened, but adjourned on March 31.
March 27: Senior General Than Shwe calls for “fully institutionalized
discipline” at 60th anniversary celebration of Armed Forces Day. May
7: Three bomb blasts at crowded shopping centers in Rangoon kill and
injure large number of bystanders (official figure of 11 fatalities and
160 wounded considered underestimations); SPDC accuses foreign-
based opposition groups, but identity of the perpetrators remains un-
clear as of summer 2005. July 22: Khin Nyunt sentenced to 44 years in
jail, suspended. July 26: Burma announces it will forgo 2006 chair-
manship of ASEAN. November 6: Relocation of civil servants from
Rangoon to new capital near Pyinmana, southern Mandalay Division,
commences.
06-205 (01) Front.qxd 7/13/06 7:38 AM Page xxxii
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 1
Introduction
1
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 2
2 • INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION • 3
rawaddy River (which is Southeast Asia’s second longest river); and up-
land and mountainous areas, which form the country’s borders with In-
dia, China, Laos, and Thailand. The coastal and river delta regions, en-
dowed with fertile and well-watered soils where paddy rice can be
cultivated, have been home to organized states established since the
early first millennium CE by Mons and Arakanese (Rakhines). The cen-
tral plain was the original homeland of the Burmans (Bamars), the
largest ethnic group in the country, who had expanded out from this re-
gion, which includes Pagan (Bagan), Mandalay, and most other Burman
royal capitals, to impose permanent control over the Irrawaddy Delta
and Arakan by the late 18th century. The upland and mountainous areas
have been home to a large number of ethnic minority groups who, with
the exception of the Shans (Tais) in eastern Burma, did not establish or-
ganized states or adopt Indo-Buddhist civilization, as had the Burmans,
Mons, and Arakanese. Many upland minority groups living in the more
remote areas were not brought under central government control until
the late 19th or early 20th centuries, during the British colonial period;
the remotest areas, such as the Wa region on the Burma–China border,
remain effectively outside of central government control even today.
Although Burmese states have had difficulty exerting their authority
over the upland peoples, the “horseshoe” of mountains and hills where
they live—which include the eastern spur of the Himalayas and the
Chin Hills—have isolated and protected the country from domination
and cultural assimilation by powerful neighboring states, especially
those based in China or the Indian subcontinent. When the British sub-
jugated Burma in three wars during the 19th century, their route of con-
quest was not across the mountains from northeastern India, but by sea
to Rangoon (Yangon), where they established the center of their colo-
nial administration in 1852, and north along the Irrawaddy River to the
last royal capital at Mandalay, which fell to British forces in 1885. In a
similar manner, the Arakan (Rakhine) Yoma (Arakan Mountain Range)
protected the independent kingdom of Arakan from Burmese encroach-
ments until the late 18th century.
Burma’s climate is dominated by the seasonal monsoons, and most
parts of the country, with the exception of the extreme north and south,
have three recognizable seasons: a hot, dry season, from March to May;
a rainy season from May or June to October; and a cool, dry season
from November to February. The rainy season is vital for agriculture (in
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 4
4 • INTRODUCTION
terms of gross domestic product and labor force, the most important
sector in the economy), since irrigated fields are not extensive and most
crops are rain-fed. Because of the “rain shadow” formed by the Arakan
Yoma, the Dry Zone in the central Irrawaddy Valley (the Burman heart-
land) has semidesert conditions. Traveling overland from Rangoon to
Mandalay, one encounters prosperous villages with abundant harvests
of rice, vegetables, and fruit in the south (since colonial times known as
“Lower Burma”), while outside of irrigated districts most settlements in
the arid central part of the country (“Upper Burma”) are significantly
poorer, dependent on harvests of peanuts, sesame seeds, sugar palm,
and other dry climate crops.
NATURAL RESOURCES
ADMINISTRATION
INTRODUCTION • 5
No official census has been undertaken since 1983, when the population
was enumerated at 35.3 million. During the opening years of the 21st
century, the total population is estimated at between 48 and 50 million,
though the U.S. government provided a much lower estimate of only
42.5 million in July 2003 (CIA World Factbook). Estimates of annual
population growth also vary widely, from 0.52 percent to 1.7 percent.
Only about a quarter of the population lives in urban areas, reflecting
the relatively undeveloped industrial economy. But the former capital
and largest city, Rangoon, had between 4.5 and 5 million people in
2005, making it a good example of a Southeast Asian–style “primate
city”: not only the largest city by far in terms of population, but also the
undisputed center of political, administrative, and economic power. The
second largest city is Mandalay, with an estimated population of
600,000–800,000. Burma’s average population density, estimated by
the government in 2000 at 74 persons per square kilometer (191 persons
per square mile), is not especially high, and is exceeded by Vietnam, In-
donesia, and Thailand.
The ancestors of the modern Burmese came from various parts of
what are now western/southwestern China and Tibet over the past two
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 6
6 • INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION • 7
8 • INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION • 9
SOCIAL STRATIFICATION
10 • INTRODUCTION
People at the bottom of the social ladder, who have little or no social
capital (connections to powerful or influential persons, especially the
military), include not only border-area ethnic minority villagers (though
ethnic armed insurgencies have their own, often quite wealthy, elites,
especially in drug-producing areas), many of whom have become “in-
ternal refugees,” but also villagers in the poorer areas of the Dry Zone
(prime recruiting ground for the Tatmadaw), and the urban unemployed
or underemployed, such as day laborers, street vendors, and pedicab
(“sidecar”) drivers. Among the poorest people are those who were
forcibly relocated after 1988 from the city centers of Rangoon and Man-
dalay to remote “new towns” on the outskirts, where employment op-
portunities are minimal.
British colonial observers often claimed that Burmese women en-
joyed freedom and social status approaching equality to men to an even
greater degree than that of their European counterparts, but women out-
side of the wealthiest classes today are an especially vulnerable group.
Poor women sometimes face horrifying choices, between letting their
children starve or a life of prostitution. Some women become silashin,
Buddhist devotees (sometimes described as Buddhist “nuns”) and find
refuge in a life devoted to spiritual ends.
RELIGIOUS LIFE
INTRODUCTION • 11
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT
12 • INTRODUCTION
Dynastic Burma
From a Burman perspective, the country’s history as a nation began
with the reign of King Anawrahta (r. 1044–1077), founder of the Pagan
(Bagan) Dynasty (1044–ca. 1325). He unified Upper and Lower Burma
with the conquest of the Mon kingdom of Thaton in 1057 and brought
its king, Manuha (described by some Burmese today as the country’s
“first political prisoner”); his family; and thousands of Mon monks,
scholars, and artisans back to his royal capital. The Mons were to the
Burmans what the Greeks were to the Romans, transmitters of a more
sophisticated civilization, but the single greatest contribution of
Anawrahta to Burma’s evolving statehood was his recognition of Ther-
avada Buddhism as the official religion, suppressing or subordinating
other cults and establishing a close, symbiotic relationship between
state and Sangha that continues, in much altered form, today. For this he
depended on Mon monks, especially the revered Shin Arahan, for guid-
ance. Physically, the most enduring legacy of the reign of Anawrahta
and his successors are the several thousand pagodas, pahto (temples),
and monasteries spread out across the Pagan plain—among the most
impressive being the Ananda Temple, built by Kyanzittha (r.
1084–1113), and the Shwezigon Pagoda, built by Anawrahta and com-
pleted by Kyanzittha—which are recognized along with the Angkor ru-
ins in Cambodia and the Borobudur temple in Java as the most out-
standing monuments in the Southeast Asia region.
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 13
INTRODUCTION • 13
By the early 14th century, the Pagan monarchy had come to an end,
its decline impelled in part by the Mongol invasion of 1287. Centuries
of unrest and confusion followed in Upper Burma, though a new Bur-
man royal capital was established at Ava (Inwa) in 1364. For the Mons
in Lower Burma and the Arakanese, however, the 14th, 15th, and 16th
centuries were a golden age, as witnessed by the reigns of King
Razadarit (r. 1385–1423), Queen Shinsawbu (r. 1453–1472), and King
Dhammazedi (r. 1472–1492) at Hanthawaddy (modern-day Pegu [Bago]),
the last two being devout Buddhists who donated generously to the
Shwe Dagon Pagoda; and King Min Bin (r. 1531–1553) at Mrauk-U, a
cosmopolitan city that Portuguese voyagers described in glowing terms.
Min Bin and his successors were perhaps unique among Burmese rulers
in making full use of naval power, expanding Arakan’s domains to in-
clude parts of present-day Bangladesh. North of the now-abandoned
Arakanese capital is a complex of temples and pagodas, most notably
the Shittaung (Sittaung) Temple, built in a style quite distinct from those
of the Irrawaddy Valley.
During the reigns of Kings Tabinshwehti (r. 1531–1550) and Bayin-
naung (r. 1551–1581), the country was united under a new Burman
royal house, the Toungoo Dynasty (1486–1752), which traced its ori-
gins to the town of the same name in the Sittang (Sittoung) River Val-
ley. Bayinnaung was the consummate conqueror king, imposing his au-
thority over the Shan States; the rival Siamese kingdom of Ayuthaya,
whose capital he captured in the 1560s; and Laos. Upper and Lower
Burma were united after Bayinnaung captured Ava in 1555, and the
Toungoo Dynasty monarchs established their seat of power at the old
Mon city of Hanthawaddy (Pegu), which became renowned among
Southeast Asian capitals for its wealth and power. But Bayinnaung’s
death in 1581 signaled the dynasty’s decline, and by century’s end
Lower Burma was in a state of turmoil due to invasions by the
Arakanese and Siamese and civil war.
However, the Toungoo Dynasty, restored, persisted until the mid-
18th century. A fateful development was the decision of King Thalun (r.
1629–1648) to move the capital from Pegu back to Ava in the central
plain in 1635; its inland location cut off the Burman power center from
seaborne foreign trade and cosmopolitan influences, encouraging an
isolationist worldview that was especially strong during the subsequent
Konbaung Dynasty (1752–1885).
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 14
14 • INTRODUCTION
The Konbaung Dynasty was the third high tide of Burman imperial
expansion. Alaungpaya, its founder (r. 1752–1760), ruthlessly crushed
Mon and other rebel movements in Lower Burma and led an unsuc-
cessful invasion of Siam; his son Hsinbyushin (r. 1763–1776) captured
and pillaged Ayuthaya in 1767 and waged a successful campaign
against Chinese attempts to impose suzerainty in the Shan States in
1766–1769; another of Alaungpaya’s sons, Bodawpaya (r. 1782–1819),
conquered the hitherto independent kingdom of Arakan in 1784–1785,
launched numerous unsuccessful invasions of Siam, and promoted land
surveys and expansion of irrigation in his kingdom. In his last years,
however, he seems to have been afflicted with megalomania, as re-
flected in his construction of the massive Pagoda at Mingun on the Ir-
rawaddy River (if completed, it would have been 170 meters high) and
his claims to be a “Future Buddha,” which the Sangha refused to rec-
ognize.
INTRODUCTION • 15
Only the 1824–1826 operation was a war in the genuine sense, in-
volving combat between British and Burmese forces in northeastern In-
dia and a British expeditionary force, which landed at Rangoon, fought
numerous engagements in and around the city, and pushed its way up to
Yandabo on the Irrawaddy River before imposing a treaty on King
Bagyidaw (r. 1819–1837), who ceded Arakan and Tenasserim
(Tanintharyi) to British control and recognized the states of northeast-
ern India as lying within the British sphere of influence. The 1852 war,
sparked by a minor dispute over indemnities and alleged mistreatment
of British merchants, was a model episode of “gunboat diplomacy” that
led to the annexation of Lower Burma, including Rangoon. This left the
Konbaung kingdom as a rump, consisting of Upper Burma with loose
control over border area tributaries. The 1885 war, whose immediate
cause was a commercial dispute over forestry leases, reflected the
British assumption that Burma’s independence was a fiction, and that
full colonial occupation was both progressive and inevitable.
However, the fall of Mandalay in November 1885 and the British de-
cision to abolish the monarchy stirred countrywide resistance. During
1885–1890, the British had to call in extra troops from India to carry out
what became known as the “Pacification of Burma,” a classic colonial
war fought against rural guerrillas, often led by a minlaung, or pretender-
king, who wished to restore the old dynasty or establish a new one. The
British also imposed control over the upland ethnic minority areas, a
more gradual process that continued into the early 20th century. For ex-
ample, the Chin Hills were not fully under British control until after the
1917–1919 Anglo-Chin War.
The British colonial occupation transformed Burmese society, though
the impact of the transformation differed according to region and ethnic/
social group. Most fundamentally, the country was integrated into a
globalized economic system that the British themselves dominated dur-
ing the 19th and early 20th centuries. After Lower Burma was annexed
in 1852, they encouraged Burmese migration from still-independent
Upper Burma in order to develop an economy based on the cultivation
and commercial export of rice. The settlement of the Irrawaddy Delta
and the area around Rangoon, which had been depopulated by wars be-
tween Burmans and Mons in the previous century, was similar, in many
ways, to the opening up of the American and Canadian West at roughly
the same time: The government offered inducements to farmers and
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 16
16 • INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION • 17
18 • INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION • 19
The colonial armed forces were small, just a few thousand soldiers
after World War I, but the great majority of them were border area
people, especially Chins and Kachins, as well as Karens. Given their
history of insurrection, Burmans were not considered trustworthy as
soldiers. Karen–Burman relations, characterized by mutual suspicion
if not hostility, posed special problems for national integration. Large
numbers of them lived in the Irrawaddy Delta and Rangoon as well
as in the remoter Burma–Thailand border region, and a vigorous eth-
nic consciousness emerged, with British encouragement, especially
after the establishment of the Karen National Association by Christ-
ian leaders in 1881 (though only a minority of Karens were, and are,
Christians; the others are Buddhists and animists). Of all the minor-
ity peoples, the Karens developed the strongest sense of their sepa-
rate nationhood under British rule, as expressed in Sir San Crombie
Po’s classic Burma and the Karens (1928); they also had the greatest
apprehensions about what their future would be in a postcolonial,
Burman-dominated state.
Administratively, Burma was a province of British India, which cre-
ated further problems becausee conditions in the country were different
from the caste-ridden subcontinent, and Indian laws and administrative
practices were not always appropriate. In the lowland areas under the
old kings, hereditary myothugyi (“circle chiefs”) based in regional
towns but with authority over adjoining villages played an important
role in mediating between the central authorities and village communi-
ties, especially in matters of labor service and taxation. But the British
abolished their posts in the late 1880s, regarding the myothugyi as un-
trustworthy, and redesigned local and regional administration in con-
formity with a rationalized, hierarchical model that often did not win
the allegiance or cooperation of local people.
There was a strong feeling among many Burmans that the British
government, having sent King Thibaw into exile, was illegitimate. The
self-government measures that the British introduced before World War
II—the “dyarchy” reforms of 1923 and the Government of Burma Act
of 1935, implemented in 1937—were generally met with indifference,
skepticism, or hostility, as reflected in low voting rates for the legisla-
tive assembly and a vocal noncooperation movement. Constitutional re-
forms were not an expression of the popular will, but the result of deci-
sions made in distant London that had little positive impact on people’s
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 20
20 • INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION • 21
22 • INTRODUCTION
February–May of that year, they were reinstated, and they then estab-
lished a nationwide student organization known as the All Burma Stu-
dents’ Union (ABSU). This brought the young leaders to national
prominence. In 1937–1938, both Nu and Aung San became members
of the Dobama Asiayone, and the latter, serving as secretary general of
the Thakin Party, joined with the Sinyetha Party of Dr. Ba Maw, a for-
mer prime minister and prominent mainstream politician, to form the
Freedom Bloc after the outbreak of the war in Europe. The Freedom
Bloc demanded self-rule, but the Churchill government, preoccupied
with the threat of Nazi Germany, refused in any way to accommodate
Burmese national aspirations.
INTRODUCTION • 23
24 • INTRODUCTION
member of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere (Dai To–a Kyo–ei
Ken). Dr. Ba Maw was appointed Nain-ngandaw Adipadi (head of state)
in a regime that he described as “totalitarian” in nature. But Burma’s in-
dependence was fictional, and the more arrogant Japanese officers
treated its highest officials, including Ba Maw and Foreign Minister
Thakin Nu, with barely disguised contempt.
But under both the military administration and Ba Maw’s “indepen-
dent” state, space was opened up within which Burmese could organize
socially, politically, and even militarily. Japanese-sponsored groups,
such as the East Asia Youth League and civil defense groups established
by Ba Maw provided valuable leadership and organizational experience
for young nationalists, but the most important institution to grow out of
the Japanese occupation was the army. The BIA was dissolved in July
1942 and replaced by a smaller but more rationally structured Burma
Defence Army (BDA), whose commander was Aung San. Following in-
dependence in 1943, the BDA was transformed into the Burma National
Army (BNA). Aung San became a member of Ba Maw’s cabinet as war
minister, and Ne Win was appointed BNA commander. An officers’
training school was established at Mingaladon, north of Rangoon, and
a number of promising young men were sent off to Japan for training in
military academies.
For the Burmans, wartime memories of the Japanese were not as bit-
ter as in many neighboring countries, but the Kempeitai, the military po-
lice, carried out a reign of terror, arresting, torturing, and killing sus-
pected communists or Allied agents. An estimated 100,000 Asians,
including Burmese, died as forced laborers during construction of the
notorious Thai–Burma Railway. The war also had an immense impact
on the ethnic minorities, especially the Karens. During the opening
months of the war, Karen soldiers fought alongside the British; after
their defeat, they were demobilized. Returning to their homes in the Ir-
rawaddy Delta, they became involved in armed clashes with BIA men,
which led to a race war: Hundreds of villages were burned, and Karens,
including women and children, were massacred, especially in
Myaungmya (Myoungmya) district. The experience taught the Karens
never to trust the Burmans, although both Aung San and Ba Maw tried
to improve relations. There was also mob violence in early 1942 be-
tween Buddhist Arakanese and Muslims in Arakan. In the Frontier Ar-
eas, Kachin, Chin, Naga, and other “hill tribe” soldiers fought on the
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 25
INTRODUCTION • 25
British side, and the isolation of their homelands was lost forever; after
the war, some of these veterans, especially Kachins, began armed re-
sistance against the central government.
Following the disastrous Japanese Imphal Campaign into northeast-
ern India in March–June 1944, which bled their forces white, the Allies
began their offensives into northwestern and central Burma. On March
27, 1945, Aung San ordered the BNA to rise up against the Japanese—
a pivotal event in official historiography that is now commemorated as
Armed Forces Day (or Resistance Day). For the Tatmadaw, it is a mat-
ter of great pride that its earliest recruits fought not only the “British
colonialists,” but also the “Japanese fascists.” By May 1945, the Allies
had recaptured Rangoon, and Japanese forces were in full retreat toward
the Thai border.
26 • INTRODUCTION
and the country’s fate was increasingly caught up with the career of
Aung San, who as commander of the Patriotic Burmese Forces (PBF),
as the BNA was renamed after it joined with Allied forces in fighting
the Japanese, enjoyed immense popularity. Only 30 years old at war’s
end, Aung San was considered a collaborationist by some British offi-
cials but had made a very positive impression on field commanders (in-
cluding General Slim) and Lord Louis Mountbatten, head of the South-
East Asia Command, who at a September 1945 conference at Kandy, Sri
Lanka, offered him command of the postwar Burma Army. He declined,
saying he intended to devote himself to politics. Aung San was presi-
dent of the country’s most popular and effective political organization,
the Anti-Fascist People’s Freedom League (AFPFL), which had grown
out of the wartime Anti-Fascist Organization. It was a broad united front
that included communist and noncommunist labor unions, peasant as-
sociations, women’s and youth groups, and ethnic organizations repre-
senting Arakanese, Karens, and Shans, with a total membership of
around 200,000. In December 1945, the AFPFL established its own
paramilitary force, the People’s Volunteer Organization (PVO), com-
posed largely of BNA and PBF veterans.
Between late 1945 and early 1947, Burma was on the verge of civil
war. The prewar British governor, Reginald Dorman-Smith, reassumed
his post; he regarded Aung San as untrustworthy and sought to reinstate
the old politicians, especially U Saw, a personal friend, brought back
from East Africa, where he had been interned for attempting to make
contact with the Japanese in 1941 (a fact of some relevance to British
charges that Aung San had been a traitor). But Dorman-Smith was re-
placed by Hubert Rance, a military officer close to Mountbatten who
was willing to take a more flexible approach to the AFPFL. In London,
a new Labour government, headed by Clement Attlee, was committed
to decolonization. Aung San, moreover, had serious disputes with the
communists, which led to their expulsion from the League in 1946; as
the Cold War heated up, his newly apparent anticommunist credentials
enhanced his credibility as a leader in the eyes of the West. In Decem-
ber 1946, Attlee invited a Burmese delegation, headed by Aung San, to
come to London to negotiate a final political settlement. On January 27,
1947, the Aung San–Attlee Agreement was signed, committing the par-
ties to full independence for Burma within a year, national elections
within four months, and British economic aid. When Constituent As-
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 27
INTRODUCTION • 27
sembly elections were held in April 1947, the AFPFL won 173 out of
182 seats contested, outside of those reserved for ethnic minorities.
The London agreement also called for integration of the Frontier Ar-
eas with Burma Proper, which proved to be an intractable, “no-win” is-
sue. A Karen Goodwill Mission had gone to London in 1946 to argue
for an independent “Karen country,” including large areas of Pegu and
Tenasserim Divisions, but it was ignored by the Clement Attlee gov-
ernment. H. N. C. Stevenson, director of the Frontier Areas Adminis-
tration, proposed an arrangement, the United Frontier Union, through
which the border peoples would be included in a single administrative
entity, separate from Burma Proper and under some form of British tute-
lage. This the AFPFL adamantly opposed. For Burman nationalists, the
integration of Burma Proper and the minority peoples, an end to “divide
and rule,” was a non-negotiable demand; because of the impending in-
dependence of India, London did not have the Indian Army at its dis-
posal to handle civil unrest and was in no position to disagree.
Fortunately, Aung San, essentially a modern-minded man who, unlike
many of his military successors, had no feelings of nostalgia for old
Burman conqueror-kings, was willing to be open-minded in responding
to the concerns of Frontier Area communities. At a conference held at
Panglong in Shan State on February 7–12, 1947, he and Shan, Kachin,
and Chin leaders reached a consensus on guarantees of equality and full
citizen rights for Frontier Area peoples, including the principle that “if
Burma receives one kyat, you will also get one kyat”—referring to past
economic neglect of the upland areas. These commitments were em-
bodied in the 1947 Constitution, which established a semifederal sys-
tem with special ethnic minority states. But the most important Karen
organization, the Karen National Union, adopted a policy of determined
noncooperation with the AFPFL, and smaller border area groups, such
as the Was and Karennis, had not been represented at Panglong.
On the morning of July 19, 1947, gunmen acting on the orders of U
Saw entered the Secretariat Building in downtown Rangoon and assas-
sinated Aung San and members of his cabinet, the Executive Council,
an event observed in Burma today as Martyrs’ Day. This irrational act
(U Saw had apparently convinced himself that with Aung San dead, the
British would appoint him head of the interim government, enabling
him to achieve his ambition of becoming prime minister) was a terrible
national tragedy, reflecting the violence that had become endemic in the
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 28
28 • INTRODUCTION
country during and after the war and removing the one Burman leader
who had won the trust of the minorities. Aung San’s words—“It will not
be feasible for us to set up a Unitary State. We must set up a Union with
properly regulated provisions as should be made to safeguard the rights
of the National Minorities. We must take care that ‘United we stand’ not
‘United we fall’.”—proved prophetic as the country settled into a tragic
pattern of military-promoted Burman chauvinism and border area in-
surgency, especially after 1962.
After the assassination, Governor Rance appointed U Nu as Aung
San’s successor. (U Saw and his accomplices were arrested, tried, and
executed the following year.) When Burma became independent from
British rule on January 4, 1948, U Nu became the country’s first prime
minister.
INTRODUCTION • 29
30 • INTRODUCTION
more genuine federal system emerged among Shan and other minority
leaders.
U Nu was a socialist, though not a Marxist, and the economy was a
mixed one, including state-owned enterprises and private firms, though
the principal foreign-owned firms, such as Burmah Oil and Steel Broth-
ers, were obliged to enter into joint ventures with the government. Land
reform was carried out in rural areas, and large, absentee-owned estates
were declared illegal. The prime minister’s foreign policy was based on
the principles of neutrality and nonalignment: Burma was the first non-
communist state to recognize the People’s Republic of China in 1949,
but it also had amicable relations with Western countries and Japan,
though U.S. support for the Kuomintang intruders in Shan State caused
a crisis in Rangoon–Washington relations. Burma received significant
amounts of official development assistance (ODA), especially from
Japan in the form of war reparations, but also from Western countries
and the Soviet Union.
The failure of democracy in Burma following its brief flourishing in
the 1950s is often attributed to the overweening ambition of Ne Win,
who, assisted by able advisors, such as Brigadier Aung Gyi, transformed
the Tatmadaw into a modern armed force, promoted strong “nation-
building” consciousness among its officers (despite the army’s politi-
cally neutral image), and presided over the emergence of a military-
owned economic empire, the Defence Services Institute, which
provided it with ample funds outside of official budgets. Long before
Ne Win’s coup d’état in March 1962, the top ranks of the army were
controlled by his cronies—especially those who had served under him
in the Fourth Burma Rifles. Organizationally, the Tatmadaw was also
becoming increasingly independent of civilian control.
But a stronger and more stable parliamentary government might have
been able to keep the army in its place. As things were, the Burmese po-
litical class was afflicted with corruption and factionalism. In early
1958, the AFPFL split into two factions: the “Clean AFPFL” loyal to U
Nu, and the larger “Stable AFPFL,” which supported Socialist Party
leaders U Ba Swe and U Kyaw Nyein. Both factions had armed sup-
porters outside the regular army: The Stable AFPFL commanded the al-
legiance of the Auxiliary Union Military Police, a paramilitary force,
and the “peace guerrillas” of the All-Burma Peasants’ Organization
were loyal to an associate of U Nu. The 1958 factional split caused a
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 31
INTRODUCTION • 31
crisis on the local and national levels, because local political bosses and
their armed followers were aligned with one group or another. Burma
seemed again to be veering toward civil war.
On October 28, 1958, U Nu proposed in parliament that General Ne
Win be asked to head a “Caretaker Government,” which would hold
general elections in six months after restoring stability. Ne Win arrested
politicians, stepped up the suppression of insurgencies, evicted urban
squatters to remote “new towns,” and promoted efficiency in the civil
service. Middle-class Burmese were in some measure relieved by Ne
Win’s determination to impose stability in a top-down manner. But from
the perspective of history, the Caretaker Government period, which was
extended beyond the original six months in order to complete its tasks,
was a dress rehearsal not only for the Revolutionary Council established
by Ne Win in March 1962, but for the State Law and Order Restoration
Council (SLORC), which seized power in September 1988. The De-
fence Services Institute expanded its control over vital economic sec-
tors. Military officers were seconded to the civil service, where they
wielded considerable power, although they were not professionally
qualified. The Tatmadaw established a nationwide, local-level civic or-
ganization, the National Solidarity Association, which anticipated the
mass organizations of the Burma Socialist Programme Party era
(1962–1988) and the post-1988 SLORC’s Union Solidarity and Devel-
opment Association (USDA).
The promised election was held in February 1960, and U Nu’s
“Clean” faction won a landslide victory. Forming a new government in
April, he reorganized his followers as the Pyidaungsu (Union) Party.
Many voters had been won over by his promise to make Buddhism the
state religion. That issue, and the issue of federalism, were major pre-
occupations during his two years in power. In his later years, U Nu had
become a devout Buddhist, and sponsored the Sixth Great Buddhist
Council during 1954–1956 to celebrate the 2,500-year anniversary of
Gotama Buddha’s attainment of nibbana (nirvana). But his proposed
constitutional amendment to give the religion official status opened a
Pandora’s box of problems: Because it was widely popular among or-
dinary Burmese, the more militant members of the Sangha wanted to
use it to curb Muslim and Christian religious activities, which the toler-
ant U Nu resisted. Ethnic minority leaders, especially among the
Kachins, most of whom were Christian, were deeply troubled, worried
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 32
32 • INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION • 33
34 • INTRODUCTION
sometimes unruly Sangha, but unlike Stalin or Mao, he was not antire-
ligious; by the 1980s, he had fitted himself into the role of a traditional
pagoda-building king, sponsoring construction of the Maha Wizaya
Pagoda, adjacent to the Shwe Dagon in Rangoon. Thus, Burma was
spared a “cultural revolution” aimed at destroying its traditional values
and cultural heritage. Furthermore, Ne Win did not attempt to create a
personality cult centered on himself, like Mao or North Korea’s Kim Il
Sung, though his rule was highly personal and often arbitrary, misin-
formed, and swayed by bad temper and astrological predictions. The of-
ficial ideology was considerably expanded through publication in 1963
of a long treatise, The System of Correlation of Man and His Environ-
ment, which was socialist but non-Marxist, with Buddhist metaphysical
elements and a dash of humanism as expressed in the aphorism, “man
matters most.”
But dissent was systematically repressed. The state took over control
of the media, and private newspapers, like The Nation, were closed
down. All books and magazines were subject to censorship by the Press
Scrutiny Board (PSB), which, according to 1975 guidelines, prohibited
publication of items deemed “harmful to national solidarity and unity.”
This forced publishers to exercise self-censorship, which had a suffo-
cating effect on Burmese literature. In late April 1965, 92 Buddhist
monks were arrested for opposing a government plan to establish a na-
tionwide Sangha organization and issue identity cards for monks. But
outside of military operations against ethnic and communist insurgents,
the state took its harshest measures against student activists. On July 7,
1962, University of Rangoon students demonstrated over campus is-
sues, and Tatmadaw troops were ordered to fire on them point-blank;
according to official figures, 15 students were killed, though the actual
number may have been in the hundreds. Early in the morning on the fol-
lowing day, troops blew up the historic Rangoon University Students
Union building, allegedly on orders from Ne Win.
The mid- and late 1960s witnessed a wave of nationalizations affect-
ing enterprises large and small, domestic and foreign. In October 1963,
the RC decreed the Enterprises Nationalization Law, which gave the
government the authority to take over any company. By the end of the
decade, some 15,000 enterprises had passed from private to state hands,
including those owned by South Asian businesspeople, tens of thou-
sands of whom were bankrupted and forced to leave the country, caus-
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 35
INTRODUCTION • 35
ing a brief diplomatic crisis with India. The anti-Chinese riots of June
1967 drove out many overseas Chinese entrepreneurs. Thus, the eco-
nomic history of post-1962 Burma resembled that of Uganda, where the
dictator Idi Amin expelled the Indian business class, rather than Thai-
land, Indonesia, or Malaysia, where nonindigenous Asians contributed
tremendously to economic growth. The lively shops and bazaars that
typify Southeast Asian commercial spaces were not entirely eliminated;
but in the “official” economy, retail trade was dominated by branches of
the state-owned People’s Stores Corporation, which became synony-
mous for poor service and empty shelves. By 1970, Rangoon, once one
of Southeast Asia’s most sophisticated cities, had become dreary and
threadbare.
Socialist policy emphasized import substitution—the development of
a domestic industrial economy to overcome the contradictions of colo-
nial dependency—including the operation of a steel mill, but in 1971
the first congress of the ruling party adopted a comprehensive “Long
Term and Short Term Economic Policies of the BSPP” that outlined a
20-year plan and shifted emphasis from industry to the export of agri-
cultural commodities, a wise move because this was still Burma’s
strongest sector. Yet agriculture was afflicted by low state prices for sta-
ple goods, an inefficient, state-run distribution system, and the vagaries
of the yearly monsoon cycle. Farmers sought to boost their sagging in-
comes by holding back as much of their harvest as possible and selling
it on the black market. Consumers, especially in urban areas, began ex-
periencing food shortages for the first time in the country’s modern his-
tory. These shortages, coupled with inflation that reflected growing eco-
nomic irrationalities, led to urban unrest, beginning in 1967 with the
anti-Chinese riots.
Economic reform, frequently promised by Ne Win, amounted to lit-
tle more than tinkering because he and his military colleagues refused to
abandon the belief that state initiatives rather than market forces should
determine the economy’s direction. Although introduction of high-yield
varieties of rice in the mid-1970s was the major factor in impressive
economic growth at that time, such growth could not be sustained. At
all times, the black market overshadowed the official economy in dy-
namism and sometimes size. It took various forms: Apart from the un-
derground trade in rice and other necessities, military officers and BSPP
cadres, having privileged access to goods at low “official” prices, sold
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 36
36 • INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION • 37
38 • INTRODUCTION
the old Frontier Areas, existed a rough equilibrium; the Tatmadaw was
not strong or well-equipped enough to defeat the armed groups, but the
latter repeatedly failed to form a strong united front and had no reach
inside central Burma. During the massive prodemocracy movement of
1988, the insurgents were bystanders to momentous events that
changed Burma’s history.
On January 3, 1974, a new constitution was promulgated, establishing
the Socialist Republic of the Union of Burma, a highly centralized,
BSPP-dominated state that remained committed to “socialist democ-
racy” and established a system of People’s Councils on the state/division
and local levels, which were chosen in Soviet-style, rubber-stamp elec-
tions. During the mid-1970s, however, Ne Win’s government faced
some of its worst crises: labor strikes in May–June 1974, caused in large
part to food shortages; the U Thant Incident of December 1974, which
marked a revival in student and monk activism that was brutally sup-
pressed by the army; and a coup d’état attempt by young officers intent
on overthrowing the socialist system in 1976. There were also extensive
purges of the BSPP hierarchy. In May 1983, the powerful head of mili-
tary intelligence, Tin Oo, considered Ne Win’s possible successor, was
cashiered and arrested.
Ne Win, 70 years old in 1981, retired as president of Burma in that
year but retained the post of BSPP chairman. The power structure that he
had built up, centered on his loyal subordinates in the Tatmadaw, had
never been characterized by commitment or effectiveness, and the “Old
Man” (as he was widely known) increasingly devoted himself to yedaya
(magic to avoid misfortune), pagoda-building, and thoughts of his im-
pending mortality. A new economic crisis loomed in the mid-1980s,
marked by recurrent food shortages, rampant inflation, and foreign debts
that could not be serviced. Burma’s leader admitted in August 1987 that
serious policy mistakes had been made, hinting that genuine reform
might be in order. But the following month he decreed demonetization
of the country’s currency without compensation in order to strike a mor-
tal blow at “economic insurgents” (the black market); in fact, ordinary
Burmese of all classes suffered because they kept much of their savings
in cash rather than in bank accounts. The demonetization measure
sparked the first student demonstrations since the 1970s and opened the
way for the heroic but tragically thwarted popular movement of 1988.
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 39
INTRODUCTION • 39
40 • INTRODUCTION
an embankment on the west shore of Inya Lake. The Riot Police at-
tacked, and as many as 300 students were killed, including many
drowned in the lake. Hundreds of other demonstrators were jailed, to
face torture and abuse. Demonstrations continued on March 18 in
downtown Rangoon.
The government’s response to the unrest seems almost to have been
calculated to inflame popular rage. It is difficult to comprehend why,
facing protests that were sometimes unruly but in general peaceful, the
Riot Police and later the Tatmadaw consistently employed lethal force,
often firing point-blank into crowds. The students were for the most part
the sons and daughters of the middle class and the elite, including mil-
itary families. Their supporters among the townspeople of Rangoon and
other cities were mostly Burmans or Burmese lowlanders, who shared
with the army and BSPP leadership the same ethnic and religious iden-
tities. Poor training and a rigid command structure may be partial ex-
planations. But more fundamentally, the lack of restraint with which the
authorities crushed the protests showed that Burma’s basic political
problem was not its plurality of ethnic and religious groups who en-
dangered national unity, for they were not significantly involved in the
events of 1988, but a leadership that was radically out of touch with its
people and a state that refused to share power or concede political space
to any social group outside itself. In a very real sense, the State waged
war against Society in 1988.
Moreover, the quality of governance was affected by the intensely hi-
erarchical and centralized nature of state power since 1962: The BSPP
state depended on Ne Win’s personal brand of leadership rather than co-
herent policies in order to operate. The well-worn principle of lu kaun,
lu taw (“good people before smart people”) meant that the “Old Man,”
fearing challenges to his own authority, consistently chose mediocre but
loyal subordinates for leadership positions, such as post-1981 President
San Yu. Talented men, such as the pragmatist Brigadier Aung Gyi or the
reform-minded defense minister, Tin U, were purged. Moreover, to pro-
tect themselves from his hot-tempered wrath and possible demotion, Ne
Win’s subordinates brought him only good news about conditions in-
side the country. Thus Ne Win, who, like France’s King Louis XIV,
could truthfully say “l’état, c’est moi” (“I am the state”), governed in a
manner that was affected not only by his erratic temper but also by pro-
found ignorance of real conditions. Though the March violence re-
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 41
INTRODUCTION • 41
42 • INTRODUCTION
His promotion to the country’s two top posts surprised and enraged
the people. Student activists declared that a general strike would be held
on August 8, 1988, the “four eights,” a date with numerological signif-
icance connected to the collapse of royal dynasties. At eight o’clock in
the morning of the designated day, hundreds of thousands of people
marched to city centers in Rangoon, Mandalay, Sagaing, and elsewhere,
carrying banners and portraits of Aung San and calling for Sein Lwin’s
resignation. Because martial law had been declared in Rangoon, the
Tatmadaw took over responsibility for public order from the Riot Po-
lice. The demonstrations began in a carnival atmosphere, as groups of
citizens from practically every city neighborhood in Rangoon partici-
pated. But the army began shooting at the amassed demonstrators late
on the evening of the eighth, in front of the Sule Pagoda and town hall,
and the bloodshed continued until August 12, when Sein Lwin resigned.
Aung San Suu Kyi, Aung San’s 43-year-old daughter, had lived
abroad for many years but had returned to Burma in early 1988 to take
care of her ailing mother. She assumed a leading role in the national cri-
sis after giving a speech on the western slope of the Shwe Dagon
Pagoda hill on August 26, attended by hundreds of thousands of Ran-
goon citizens. Daw Suu Kyi’s rapid rise to a preeminent position inside
the opposition reflected both the continued appeal of her father and the
lack of viable alternatives among the pre-1962 political establishment,
including former prime minister U Nu, who had hopes, ultimately
thwarted, of making a comeback. Only Daw Suu Kyi and some student
activist leaders, especially Min Ko Naing, had sustained popular appeal.
During August and the first half of September, conditions throughout
central Burma were extremely unsettled. Demonstrations continued in
urban areas, public services ground to a halt, and foreign embassies
urged their nationals to evacuate. On August 19, Dr. Maung Maung was
appointed BSPP chairman and Burma’s president. At a second Extraor-
dinary BSPP Congress held on September 10, he promised the adoption
of a multiparty democratic system to replace the one-party state. Two
days later, Aung San Suu Kyi, Tin U (the former defense minister with
a reputation as a reformist), and Aung Gyi formed a coalition, advocat-
ing the establishment of an interim government. This later became the
National League for Democracy.
In the late afternoon of September 18, the State Law and Order Restora-
tion Council, a junta composed of 19 officers of general, brigadier, and
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 43
INTRODUCTION • 43
44 • INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION • 45
46 • INTRODUCTION
army, are considered conservative, hard line in dealing with the opposi-
tion, and tending toward isolationism; while SLORC/SPDC Secretary-
1 Lieutenant General Khin Nyunt, director of military intelligence (a
former Ne Win protégé who was appointed to this post in 1984) was
more flexible, interested in promoting ties with foreign countries and
taking a more accommodating (or perhaps more manipulative) ap-
proach toward the NLD. But Khin Nyunt was arrested in October 2004,
charged with corruption and attempting to split the Tatmadaw, and was
sentenced to 44 years in jail, suspended. His military intelligence sub-
ordinates were also arrested or forced into retirement.
What seems apparent is that the junta has achieved “system mainte-
nance”; that is, individual generals have been removed, but the unity of
the Tatmadaw top command has been preserved, and Than Shwe, an un-
charismatic, frequently underestimated figure, has managed to consoli-
date personal control at the top, becoming Ne Win’s successor as
“Number One.” In November 1997, the SLORC was reorganized as the
State Peace and Development Council (SPDC). Although Than Shwe,
Maung Aye, and Khin Nyunt retained their positions, other SLORC
generals were retired, including those who had garnered a reputation for
corruption. Through its control of a “state capitalist” economy, espe-
cially the sale of natural resources, such as natural gas, to neighboring
countries, the SPDC and the Tatmadaw officer corps have evolved into
a rentier class that, in contrast to the pre-1988 Tatmadaw, enjoys little
esteem among the general population but is more deeply entrenched in
power than ever before.
SLORC/SPDC policies could be characterized as combining the au-
thoritarian proclivities of the Ne Win era—suppression of opposition,
rigid censorship, and control of information—with controlled global-
ization, in a manner similar to that of Burma’s huge northern neighbor,
China. The government has encouraged foreign tourism, including the
construction of international class hotels and promotion of “Visit Myan-
mar [Burma] Year” in 1996–1997; foreign private investment has been
welcomed with the decree of a post-1988 legal regime facilitating the
participation of wholly owned foreign enterprises and foreign–local
joint ventures in the economy; Burma joined the Association of South-
east Asian Nations in July 1997; there are plans to connect Burma to the
Asian Highway, linking the country overland with Thailand, Indochina,
and India; and Burma is part of the Great Mekong Subregion develop-
06-205 (02) Intro.qxd 7/13/06 7:37 AM Page 47
INTRODUCTION • 47
48 • INTRODUCTION
The Dictionary
–A–
49
06-205 (03) A-B.qxd 7/13/06 7:40 AM Page 50
On the regional level, the realm was divided into districts or myo
(a word that also referred to provincial urban centers), encompassing
what later was known as Upper and Lower Burma. Each myo was
under the control of an appointed governor and a myosa (myoza, “dis-
trict eater”), a member of the royal family or nobility whose income,
as the name indicates, came from extracting resources from his or her
jurisdiction rather than from a fixed salary. Local authorities known
as myothugyi, whose posts were usually hereditary, acted as interme-
diaries between the governor and myosa on the one hand and the
common people on the other, playing an important role in mitigating
the most extreme royal demands on the villagers in the form of rice,
silver, forced labor, and military service. In traditional Burmese po-
litical culture, the king and his officials were not—like the emperor
and elite scholar-officials of Confucian China—regarded (ideally) as
benevolent protectors of the people. Instead, the ruler (min) was de-
scribed, along with fire, flood, personal enemies, and thieves, as be-
ing one of the “five dangerous things to be avoided.” Oppressive
kings like Bodawpaya drained the country of manpower and re-
sources on expensive public works projects (including the massive
pagoda at Mingun) and military campaigns against neighboring
states, especially Siam, while weak monarchs like Thibaw allowed
their realm to collapse into lawlessness. Rarely was a king both
strong and moderate in his demands, though King Mindon ap-
proached this ideal. Palace politics was extremely unstable and at
times violent, especially after a king died, and a succession struggle
ensued among his many male progeny, that is, his sons by his nu-
merous royal wives.
The society of the valley and delta of the Irrawaddy
(Ayeyarwady) River, the Burmese heartland, was divided into four
general strata: the min-myo (rulers), the ponna-myo (Brahmins, or rit-
ualists versed in the Hindu Vedas), thuhtay-myo (bankers and rich
merchants), and sinyetha-myo (the “poor people,” or commoners).
Modeled roughly on the caste system of India (the four varna), mem-
bership in these groups was hereditary and could be changed only by
the king’s decree. Another important division in precolonial Burmese
society was between ahmudan, “royal service subjects”—members
of descent groups who supplied the royal house with goods and ser-
vices, including military officers and men, craftspeople, and palace
06-205 (03) A-B.qxd 7/13/06 7:40 AM Page 52
servants—and athi, general subjects who paid taxes to the king. The
ahmudan lived in discrete settlements outside the regular administra-
tion and were considered more prestigious than the athi because of
their close association with the palace. A final social division existed
between free people and slaves (kyun), who usually were dependent
on a certain individual (e.g., debt slaves) or foreign prisoners of war,
but who could belong to any of the four social strata mentioned
above, with the exception of the royal family. By the end of the 18th
century, a large number of foreigners had been forcibly relocated to
Upper Burma, including Arakanese, Siamese, and people from Ma-
nipur, contributing to ethnic heterogeneity.
In precolonial Burma, “ethnic” consciousness in the modern sense
did not exist, though antagonisms between Burmans (Bamars) and
Mons intensified in Lower Burma after the mid-18th century: Bur-
man rulers tended to view their Mon subjects as disloyal and all too
eager to cooperate with archenemy Siam. But there was a strong con-
sciousness of the differences between the cultures and lifestyles of
lowlanders, such as the Burmans, Mons, and Arakanese (Rakhines),
who shared a common Indo-Buddhist civilization, and upland
groups, such as the Karens (Kayins) and Chins, who were animist
and lived in scattered communities without organized states. The tra-
ditional rulers of the Shans (Tai), the sawbwa, had tributary relations
with the Burmese king, and Shan princesses frequently married into
the royal family. However, Burmese control over the Shan States
was minimal and over the Chins, Kachins, and Nagas, it was practi-
cally nonexistent.
Nationhood—the concept of a fixed land area and population hav-
ing a “national” identity—emerged in Burma during the British colo-
nial period. During the dynastic period, the power of the state “radi-
ated” outward from the royal capital, reaching to more distant regions
(the mountainous areas) when the king was strong and contracting to
close around the capital when his power and authority were weak.
Thus, national boundaries were an idea introduced by the Western
colonialists and employed after Burma became part of the commu-
nity of independent nations after 1948.
AGRICULTURE • 55
56 • AGRICULTURE
Before World War II, it was the world’s leading exporter of rice.
Agriculture remains the most important sector in the Burmese econ-
omy, employing 63 percent of the labor force and producing 57 per-
cent of the Gross Domestic Product (2000 figures). Agricultural
products still predominate among Burma’s exports, despite the in-
creasing importance of energy exports. Most Burmese farmers are
smallholders, their croplands averaging no more than two hectares
(five acres). Three types of cultivated land are found: well-watered
alluvial lowlands, located in and around the deltas of the Irrawaddy
(Ayeyarwady), Sittang (Sittoung), and Salween (Thanlwin)
Rivers and in coastal areas of Arakan State, where paddy rice is
grown; the Dry Zone of central Burma along the upper reaches of the
Irrawaddy, where water is insufficient for wet-rice cultivation (out-
side of irrigated areas, such as Kyaukse) and crops, such as oil seeds
(sunflower and sesame), beans and pulses, sugar palms, maize,
ground nuts (peanuts), and cotton are grown; and upland areas, espe-
cially near the borders with Thailand, China, and India, where ethnic
minorities practice shifting cultivation (taung-ya or hill-clearing,
though the Shans are cultivators of paddy rice). In upland areas, hill-
side vegetation is cleared, usually by burning, to prepare relatively
poor soils for the cultivation of dry rice, buckwheat, or maize in a cy-
cle of subsistence farming that is repeated every few years. In Shan
and Kachin States, the most important agricultural export has been
raw and processed opium, though cultivation and export of opiates
have declined in recent years because of drug-eradication policies.
Tropical and subtropical fruits are grown throughout the country. The
pungent-smelling durian is perhaps the most widely esteemed,
though strawberries grown around Maymyo (Pyin Oo Lwin) are
also popular.
Burma’s agricultural potential is huge because much arable land re-
mains undeveloped or underutilized. The introduction of high-yield va-
rieties of rice and other crops in the mid-1970s increased production,
but the increases were not sustained during the 1980s because of the es-
sentially coercive nature of the Whole Township Extension Program
and insufficient inputs, such as fertilizers, pesticides, and farm mecha-
nization (water buffalo or cattle are still widely used for plowing).
Coercive state procurement of rice and other crops at artificially low
prices has not given farmers incentives to be productive. Moreover,
06-205 (03) A-B.qxd 7/13/06 7:40 AM Page 57
AID, FOREIGN • 57
only about 13 percent of total arable land is irrigated, though the State
Peace and Development Council has carried out a crash program in
dam construction. Agriculture in nonirrigated areas is dependent upon
the seasonal monsoon, making it hostage to periodic flooding and
drought. To increase agricultural exports and earn hard currency, the
military regime has promoted expansion of arable land, double crop-
ping, and the development of large-scale “agribusinesses.”
In the early 21st century, Burma faces an increasingly serious food
security problem because of deforestation (causing floods and soil
erosion), degradation of soils (partly because of double cropping and
lack of fertilizers), and a chronically inefficient distribution system
left over from the Burma Socialist Programme Party era. In con-
trast to the abundant past, malnutrition in both urban and rural areas
is now widespread, especially among children. See also ECONOMY
AND ECONOMIC POLICY, BURMA SOCIALIST PROGRAMME
PARTY ERA; ECONOMY AND ECONOMIC POLICY, STATE
LAW AND ORDER RESTORATION COUNCIL/STATE PEACE
AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ERA; HEALTH.
58 • AID, FOREIGN
AIR FORCE • 59
AKHAS • 61
62 • ALAUNGPAYA, KING
66 • AMARAPURA
ANANDA PAHTO • 67
this is also the first time he or she has seen it. A person may hesitate
to tell family members that he or she is seriously ill, for fear of caus-
ing them worry and distress.
Anade is not supposed to be typical of relations between close
friends, who can afford to be frank with each other, or in situations
where the agent sees himself or herself as superior to others, for ex-
ample, a colonial-era civil servant interacting with villagers, a Tat-
madaw officer dealing with civilians, or perhaps a Burman (Ba-
mar) among ethnic minorities. In such cases, bullying often occurs,
given the strong sense of hierarchy and inequality that pervades so-
cial relations. Many observers of the contemporary Burmese scene
claim that anade inhibits the development of democracy and a civil
society because it makes it difficult for people to discuss things
frankly or debate issues. Such frankness or directness is regarded as
aggression.
Non-Burmese dealing with Burmese often find it difficult to get at
the truth of a matter because the latter may feel reluctant to divulge
bad or unsettling news that could be distressful to the hearer, even if
in the long run it would be in his or her interest to know about it.
It is probably necessary to distinguish between anade and mere
survival tactics, or passivity in the face of danger. For, example, dur-
ing the Ne Win period (1962–1988), his subordinates were very care-
ful to give him nothing but good news, for example, about the per-
formance of the socialist economy. Because the hot-tempered
dictator’s word was law, he would readily punish subordinates who
displeased him, with no hope for reprieve. See also HPOUN.
68 • ANAUKPETLUN, KING
ANGLO-BURMESE • 69
70 • ANGLO-BURMESE
and Calcutta. When the indemnity was paid in full, British forces quit
Rangoon, in December 1826.
The war was a classic instance of the clash between two expand-
ing empires. Though the Burmese fought with great courage in de-
fense of their homeland, British superiority in technology and organ-
ization prevailed, though at a high price, because 15,000 out of a total
force of 40,000 British Indian troops died, mostly from disease and
lack of adequate supplies. The war marked a shift in Burma’s rela-
tions with Britain from the offensive to the defensive. But with the
exception of King Mindon (r. 1853–1878), Burmese monarchs failed
to find a way of dealing effectively with the people they dismissively
called the Kalapyu (“white Indians”). The Second and Third Anglo-
Burmese Wars were examples of gunboat diplomacy rather than
protracted wars and resulted in Burma’s complete colonization.
74 • ANGLO-CHIN WAR
San and Than Tun, and known to the British as the Anti-Fascist Or-
ganization, its founding charter outlined its goals as ridding the
country of the “fascist Japanese” and winning independence. At the
end of the war, it emerged as the most powerful political organization
in Burma, successfully negotiating with the British to achieve inde-
pendence and governing the country during the tumultuous period
from 1948 to 1958. Both its popular appeal and its ultimate weakness
derived from its structure; it was not a single party but a united front
organization consisting of groups with diverse agendas, of which the
Socialist Party and its affiliated Burma Trade Union Congress and
All Burma Peasants’ Organization were the most important. Other
component groups included the Burma Muslim Congress, the Karen
National Congress, the United Hill Peoples’ Congress, the All-Burma
Women’s Freedom League, the Youth League, and the All Burma
Teachers’ organization. The People’s Volunteer Organization
(PVO) was the League’s paramilitary unit, made up of veterans of the
Patriotic Burmese Forces/Burma National Army. The Commu-
nist Party of Burma was expelled from the AFPFL in October 1946.
The League won a decisive victory in the April 1947 elections to the
Constituent Assembly, the interim legislature charged with drafting
the Constitution of 1947, gaining 171 of 182 noncommunal seats
contested. Aung San was president of the AFPFL until his assassina-
tion on July 19, 1947, when U Nu assumed the post and became in-
dependent Burma’s first prime minister.
In the 1951 general election, held over seven months because in-
surgencies made polling in some areas difficult, the AFPFL won 200
out of 239 seats contested. In the April 1956 general election,
Burma’s second, the AFPFL and its allies won 173 seats (the AFPFL
alone won 155), still a solid majority, though a stronger opposition
had emerged in the form of the National Unity Front.
The League’s lack of internal coherence created serious problems,
especially as the Socialist Party under Ba Swe and Kyaw Nyein grew
stronger and threatened to break away, leaving the AFPFL a power-
less rump. Through their intolerance and dogmatism, the socialists
made many enemies, especially among the ethnic minorities. The
Auxiliary Union Military Police functioned as their private army. In
June 1958, the League split into two rival factions, the “Clean AF-
PFL” led by U Nu and the “Stable AFPFL” under Ba Swe and Kyaw
06-205 (03) A-B.qxd 7/13/06 7:41 AM Page 77
ANYEINT • 77
the State Law and Order Restoration Council/State Peace and De-
velopment Council, as reflected in their arrest of the Moustache
Brothers in 1996. See also PWE.
ARCHITECTURE, MODERN • 81
probably migrated into modern Burma from Inner Asia around the
same time, the eighth and ninth centuries CE. Some linguists suggest
that Arakanese is similar to archaic Burmese. Most Arakanese are
Buddhists, though there is a Muslim minority, commonly called Ro-
hingyas, and Muslim influences from the Indian subcontinent have
historically been strong. According to the 1983 census, the last taken,
the Arakanese comprised 4.5 percent of Burma’s population. See also
ARAKAN (RAKHINE); MRAUK-U.
82 • ARCHITECTURE, RELIGIOUS
ARCHITECTURE, RELIGIOUS • 83
84 • ARCHITECTURE, TRADITIONAL
ARMY • 87
90 • ASTROLOGY
AUNG SAN, LEGACY OF. Aung San’s legacy has been contested
by successive Burmese governments, ethnic minorities, and the
democratic opposition, especially after 1988. Following his rise to
national prominence during the 1936 student strike, he became a
man of action, a military as well as political leader, rather than a man
of ideas. Yet he had a strongly modernist vision of the nation, as re-
flected in his commitment to the separation of religion and state, an
opinion he held as early as his secondary school days. He was also
opposed to the restoration of the monarchy in a postcolonial Burma.
Like his nationalist student comrades, he embraced socialism as the
antidote for colonial economic exploitation, and he was one of the
founding members of the Communist Party of Burma, serving as
its secretary general in 1939–1940. He broke with the communists
in 1946, however, and his successors, U Nu and Ne Win, espoused
non-Marxist forms of socialism. Some scholars argue that Buddhist
and other traditional influences on his thinking have been greatly un-
derestimated, but he is largely remembered as the founder of a mod-
ern army and state.
Ethnic minority leaders remember him fondly as the one Burman
(Bamar) leader who treated them as equals in nation-building, at the
February 1947 Panglong Conference. Unlike his successors, he did not
propose the use of Buddhism or Burman ethnic identity as the basis for
national unity. Especially during the Ne Win period (1962–1988), Aung
06-205 (03) A-B.qxd 7/13/06 7:41 AM Page 96
San was revered as the “father” of the Tatmadaw, while Ne Win was
its “stepfather.” Portraits of him, usually in uniform, were prominent in
government offices and on the nation’s paper currency. His short life
was a major theme in the country’s history textbooks. On the 35th an-
niversary of Martyrs’ Day in 1982, the state media described him as the
“fourth unifier” of Burma, following the old kings Anawrahta, Bayin-
naung, and Alaungpaya.
When student activists and citizens carried his portrait in the
streets of Rangoon (Yangon) and other cities during the massive
demonstrations of 1988, he became a symbol of Burma’s democratic
aspirations, especially after his daughter, Aung San Suu Kyi,
emerged as the most prominent leader of the post-1988 opposition
movement. In several highly controversial statements, Aung San Suu
Kyi indicated that Ne Win had betrayed Aung San’s vision of the Tat-
madaw as an army serving the people. As the State Law and Order
Restoration Council (SLORC) consolidated its power in the early
1990s, it consciously downgraded Aung San’s historical significance,
while at the same time exalting the nation-building achievements of
the old kings, especially Bayinnaung, whose royal palace at Pegu
(Bago) was reconstructed. Portraits of Aung San largely disappeared
from the nation’s currency after 1988, and Aung San Suu Kyi, the
most potent living symbol of Aung San’s legacy, has been kept for
considerable periods under house arrest. See also AUNG SAN, AS-
SASSINATION OF; STUDENTS, HISTORICAL ROLE OF.
AUNG SAN SUU KYI, DAW (1945– ). Daughter of Aung San, Aung
San Suu Kyi is one of the founders of the National League for De-
mocracy (NLD) and the most prominent leader of the post-1988 de-
mocracy movement. Born in Rangoon (Yangon) on June 19, 1945,
she was the second of three children of Aung San and his wife Daw
Khin Kyi. She was only two when her father was assassinated on
July 19, 1947. After her mother was appointed Burma’s ambassador
to India in 1961, she lived most of her life abroad, until 1988. She ob-
tained a degree in philosophy, politics, and economics from Oxford
University; worked for the United Nations in New York; and married
a British scholar of Tibet, Michael Aris, in 1972. Subsequently, they
lived in Bhutan, London, Oxford (where Dr. Aris was a fellow at St.
John’s College), and India, and Daw Suu Kyi spent some months in
06-205 (03) A-B.qxd 7/13/06 7:41 AM Page 97
The period from November 1995, when she withdrew the National
League for Democracy from the National Convention constitution-
drafting process, branding it undemocratic, to a second term of house
arrest beginning in September 2000, was a time of tense and con-
frontational relations with the SLORC (renamed the State Peace and
Development Council [SPDC] in late 1997). She aroused the gener-
als’ ire by supporting the imposition of economic sanctions by West-
ern countries and the continued freeze on overseas development as-
sistance to the SLORC/SPDC, and urged an international boycott of
“Visit Myanmar Year,” the regime’s campaign in 1996–1997 to
raise revenue through tourism. The regime responded by calling her
an “axe handle” (tool) of foreign, neocolonial powers, a traitor to her
race for marrying an Englishman, and a power-hungry witch, as de-
picted in childishly tasteless cartoons in the state-run New Light of
Myanmar (Myanmar Alin) newspaper in the late 1990s. All this
abuse did little to undermine the esteem in which she was held by her
compatriots and abroad, though some critics argued, not always with
disinterested motives, that she was too confrontational and un-
schooled in Burmese cultural values.
Her second term of house arrest—arising from her insistence on
visiting NLD offices outside Rangoon, which the regime wished to
prevent—lasted from September 2000 until May 6, 2002. In January
2001, the special envoy of the United Nations Secretary-General to
Burma, Razali Ismail, announced that Daw Suu Kyi and the SPDC had
begun secret talks, aimed at confidence building, as the preliminary step
toward reaching a peaceful political accommodation. After her release,
she was given unprecedented freedom to travel around the country and
meet with local NLD members, and she seemed to have toned down her
criticism of the SPDC. At the end of 2002, however, there was no indi-
cation that the military regime was willing to undertake serious politi-
cal dialogue with her. Following the “Black Friday” Incident of May
30, 2003, in which she and her supporters were attacked by pro-junta
mobs in Sagaing Division, Aung San Suu Kyi was imprisoned and then
placed under a third term of house arrest. See also AUNG SAN SUU
KYI, IDEAS OF; AUNG SAN SUU KYI, SYMBOLISM OF.
traditionally the side of the mother). Above all, in a land where fam-
ily relations are all-important, her tie to her father Aung San gave her
unparalleled authority as an oppositionist. Thus, she was cast by some
Burmese in the role of a minlaung, a pretender to the throne or
monarch-to-be.
In the West, both governments and individuals have lauded her as
a living testament to the universal relevance of human rights and de-
mocracy, at a time when these values are being challenged by more
particularistic “Asian values.” Her emphasis on the spiritual aspects
of democratization and her synthesis of democratic and Buddhist
values have also given her a symbolic appeal overseas similar to that
of Mahatma Gandhi during India’s struggle for independence.
AVA • 101
AVA (INWA). Meaning “mouth of the river” (in-wa), Ava began its his-
tory as a royal capital during the reign of King Thadominbya
(1364–1368) and remained the capital of Burman (Bamar) king-
doms until the early Toungoo Dynasty. King Thalun returned the
capital from Pegu (Bago) to Ava in 1635, where it remained until
1752, when it was laid waste by Mon rebels. It was the Konbaung
Dynasty royal capital from 1765 to 1783, during the reigns of Kings
Hsinbyushin (r. 1763–1776), Singu Min (r. 1776–1781), and Maung
Maung (r. 1781), but King Bodawpaya moved the capital to Ama-
rapura in 1783. Between 1823 and 1837, Ava served as the capital
06-205 (03) A-B.qxd 7/13/06 7:41 AM Page 102
–B–
rebel leader Saya San in 1931. The following year, he began his po-
litical career as a leader of the Anti-Separation League, and in 1936
he founded his own party, the Sinyetha (Proletarian or Poor Man’s)
Party. In 1937, he became the first prime minister under the Gov-
ernment of Burma Act, but his government fell in February 1939.
In October of that year, he became president of the Freedom Bloc (in
Burmese, Htwet Yat Gaing, or “Association of the Way Out”), a na-
tionalist alliance of the Sinyetha Party, the Dobama Asiayone, and
the All Burma Students’ Union. Secretary general of the Bloc was
Thakin Aung San, with whom he had a close if not necessarily
smooth working relationship during the war.
Before he was tried and imprisoned by the British for sedition (Au-
gust 1940–April 1942), Ba Maw met Japanese diplomats and secret
agents in the hope that Tokyo would aid the struggle for indepen-
dence, facilitating Aung San’s departure from Burma and contact
with Colonel Suzuki Keiji. After the Japanese Army occupied
Burma, the Military Administration (Gunseikanbu) designated him
head of the Burmese Executive Administration. When Burma’s “in-
dependence” under Japanese rule was proclaimed on August 1, 1943,
he became head of state (Nain-ngandaw Adipadi). Seeking to impose
“totalitarian” rule under the slogan “One blood, one voice, one
leader,” he established a single state party, the Dobama Sinyetha Asi-
ayone (later known as the Maha Bama Party) in 1942, and mass or-
ganizations of workers (the Chwe Tat or “Sweat Army”), civil ser-
vants, and ordinary citizens. Viewed by many of the Thakins as a
Japanese puppet, he was in fact so jealous of his independence that a
clique in the Japanese army arranged an unsuccessful assassination
attempt against him in February 1944. At the end of the war, he es-
caped to Japan and was imprisoned at Sugamo Prison in Tokyo be-
fore being allowed to return home in 1946. Although he reassumed
leadership of the Maha Bama Party, his wartime association with the
Japanese discredited him in Burmese eyes, and he never again played
a major political role. In 1966, he was imprisoned for a time by the
Ne Win regime.
Ba Maw’s Breakthrough in Burma: Memoirs of a Revolution,
1939–1946 is a well-written and authoritative, though not unbiased,
account of this historically important period. See also JAPANESE
OCCUPATION; MINAMI KIKAN; THIRTY COMRADES.
06-205 (03) A-B.qxd 7/13/06 7:41 AM Page 105
BA SWE, U • 105
its president in 1947. From 1947 to 1952, he was secretary general of the
Anti-Fascist People’s Freedom League (AFPFL) and in 1956–1957
served as prime minister of the Union of Burma. Following the split in
the AFPFL in March 1958, he and U Kyaw Nyein became leaders of the
“Stable” faction, in opposition to U Nu’s “Clean” faction.
BAYINGYI • 107
BAYINGYI. Derived from feringhi, a term widely used in India and the
Malay world to refer to white Europeans, especially the Portuguese,
this Burmese (Myanmar) language term refers to the followers
of Felipe de Brito, who were captured after the fall of Syriam
06-205 (03) A-B.qxd 7/13/06 7:41 AM Page 108
BHAMO • 109
put up statues of the monarch at the borders with Thailand. The mili-
tary regime’s use of Bayinnaung asserts the Tatmadaw’s historical role
in carrying on his work of hard-fisted nation-building and also deem-
phasizes the pre-1988 pantheon of modern heroes, especially Aung
San, whose daughter, Aung San Suu Kyi, leads the prodemocracy
movement.
110 • BILU
the past was an important trade center linking China and Upper
Burma.
BO BO AUNG • 113
hardship, was the major factor in the nationwide unrest and antigov-
ernment movements of 1988.
In principle, the black market no longer exists, since the State Law
and Order Restoration Council decreed the end of the socialist sys-
tem in 1988. However, laws relating to business are applied incon-
sistently, private businesses are still barred from some sectors (such
as gemstones and oil and natural gas), and the present military
regime continues to view business people as motivated by an evil
profit motive. Thus crackdowns, especially on currency traders, are
frequent. See also AGRICULTURE; CURRENCY AND EX-
CHANGE RATES; ECONOMY AND ECONOMIC POLICY,
BURMA SOCIALIST PROGRAMME PARTY ERA.
114 • BO MOGYO
BRITO, FELIPE DE (?–1613). During the 16th and early 17th cen-
turies, Portuguese soldiers of fortune played an important role in
the turbulent history of the times as mercenaries of Burmese rulers,
especially Tabinshwehti and Bayinnaung. De Brito, who served
the king of Arakan during his invasion of Lower Burma in 1599,
gained control of the port of Syriam (Thanlyin) and attempted to
06-205 (03) A-B.qxd 7/13/06 7:41 AM Page 120
122 • BUDDHISM
less-strict code based on the five or ten precepts (sila). Although the
Buddha himself is not considered a god, Burmese Buddhism coexists
with a pantheon of gods or nats, local and brought from India, who
are often seen as divine protectors of the religion.
The Buddha’s teachings can be summarized as emphasizing im-
permanence, suffering as the basic quality of life, and non-self, that
is, the lack of an immortal soul. The basic principles are summed up
in the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path of Righteousness that
Gotama Buddha taught. Escape from samsara and the attainment of
nibbana are considered the supreme goods. Most ordinary Buddhists
hope that by accumulating merit (kutho) through performance of
good deeds, they can achieve a rebirth on a plane higher than their
present one, or at least avoid the torments of hell. Connected with
Buddhism, though not doctrinally consistent with it, are certain mag-
ical practices, such as yedaya, that can be used as protection against
ill fortune.
marking the BNA’s departure for the front, and 10 days later, on
March 27 (commemorated now as Armed Forces Day), the army be-
gan attacking Japanese units, largely through guerrilla operations.
Lord Louis Mountbatten, Commander for South-East Asia, recog-
nized the BNA as part of the Allied war effort, designating them the
Patriotic Burmese Forces. See also ANTI-FASCIST ORGANIZA-
TION; FORCE 136; JAPANESE OCCUPATION; WORLD WAR II
IN BURMA (MILITARY OPERATIONS).
BURMANS • 129
130 • BURMANS
–C–
the political confusion that resulted from the split of the Anti-Fascist
People’s Freedom League (AFPFL) into “Clean” and “Stable”
factions earlier in the year. Prime Minister U Nu introduced a mo-
tion in parliament that General Ne Win, commander of the Tat-
madaw, be offered the prime ministership for a six-month period to
restore stability and create suitable conditions for holding a general
election. Parliament subsequently extended his term for a longer
period.
Ne Win ordered the arrest of many politicians and took a hard line
toward insurgents in the countryside. The power of civilian authori-
ties on all levels of administration was drastically weakened, as mil-
itary officers were placed in control of central and state/division
government agencies. The army-owned Defence Services Institute,
managed by the capable Brigadier Aung Gyi, expanded rapidly, tak-
ing over state-owned and even private enterprises. In Shan State, the
hereditary rulers, sawbwa, relinquished the powers they had enjoyed
under British rule. Throughout the country, the Tatmadaw established
branches of the National Solidarity Association to promote security
and social welfare.
Although the restoration of law and order and greater government
efficiency were widely appreciated, the Caretaker Government was
much resented by poor people in Rangoon (Yangon), more than
170,000 of whom were victims of forced relocation to satellite
towns. Many ethnic minority communities also feared and hated the
military. The general elections held in February 1960 resulted in a
victory for U Nu’s Pyidaungsu (Union) Party, as the AFPFL Clean
faction was later renamed, despite widespread army backing for the
AFPFL Stable faction. Power was transferred without incident to the
new government in April 1960. Many observers view the Caretaker
Government as a dress rehearsal not only for the Revolutionary
Council established in March 1962, but also for the September 1988
State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC), because the
latter depicted itself as a transitional administration and also prom-
ised to hold a election, which took place on May 27, 1990, with un-
expected results. The Union Solidarity and Development Associa-
tion, founded by the SLORC in the early 1990s, bears a strong
resemblance to the National Solidarity Association. See also
OKKALAPA, NORTH AND SOUTH; THAKETA.
06-205 (04) C-F.qxd 7/13/06 7:43 AM Page 136
CEASE-FIRES • 137
138 • CHETTIARS
are the majority, although there are some Burmans (Bamars) and
Nagas; Arakanese (Rakhines) live in the southern part of the state.
Croplands are not extensive because of the mountainous landscape,
and shifting cultivation (taungya) is widespread. The region is heav-
ily forested. The transportation and communication infra structure is
poorly developed. Between independence in 1948 and implementa-
tion of the Constitution of 1974, Chin State was known as the Chin
Special Division.
per Burma in 1886, Britain and China signed a border treaty that
later was significantly revised with the signing of a new border de-
marcation agreement by the independent Union of Burma and the
People’s Republic of China in 1961.
During World War II, Chinese Nationalist (Kuomintang/
Guomindang) troops participated in Allied operations against the
Japanese. Since the People’s Republic of China was established in
1949, the incursion of Kuomintang irregulars into the Shan States,
and Beijing’s support for a Communist Party of Burma base along
the border following the Anti-Chinese Riots of June 1967, have con-
tributed greatly to Burma’s instability and provide a major rationali-
zation for the perpetuation of military dictatorship. See also BURMA
ROAD; CHINESE IN BURMA; KENG TUNG; KOKANG; LEDO
ROAD; OPIUM; SINO-BURMESE; WAS.
CHINRAM • 145
lowing the June 1967 Anti-Chinese Riots, and those who remained
took care to downplay their Chinese identity.
After the State Law and Order Restoration Council seized
power in September 1988, ties with the People’s Republic of China
became close, and large-scale immigration of Chinese people oc-
curred. The widespread practice of selling the identity cards of de-
ceased Burmese to Chinese immigrants made it possible for them to
integrate—administratively though not culturally—into Burmese so-
ciety. Because there are no accurate census figures, the number of
new Chinese residents is not known, but it is believed that they com-
prise around 30 percent of the population of Mandalay. An article in
the Hong Kong–based Asiaweek magazine in 1999 reported that hun-
dreds of thousands of Chinese may have entered the country follow-
ing flooding in southern China. According to a Thai observer quoted
in that article, the inflow has “chang[ed] the whole demographic bal-
ance in north Burma,” and local resentment of the new immigrants is
growing because they control much of the economy, especially in
Upper Burma. For example, in Mandalay they have raised property
values in the city center, forcing the former Burmese residents to
move to cheaper, outlying areas.
Burma has also served as a way station for Chinese wishing to im-
migrate to the United States. After paying an exorbitant fee to be
smuggled out of China (as much as US$30,000), they pass through
Burma to Thailand, whence they go by sea to North America. See
also CHINA AND BURMA (HISTORICAL RELATIONS); INDI-
ANS IN BURMA; PLURAL SOCIETY; POPULATION.
146 • CHINS
CHINS • 147
war, but also high priests who offered sacrifices to the Khua-hrum, or
guardian deities. The Chins frequently raided Burma or Bengal in
search of slaves, which led to confrontations with the British, who in
1871 began sending military expeditions into Chin territory. By 1896,
they had largely succeeded in imposing control, and implemented the
Chin Hills Regulations as a means of governing them. But a major up-
rising, the Anglo–Chin War (1917–1919), occurred, and after this war
the Chin Hills Regulations were reformed to make British rule more
acceptable, one of the most important measures being to restore the
ram-uk to their traditional authority. Many Chins were recruited into
the colonial armed forces, and the Chin Levies fought alongside the
British against the Japanese in World War II.
Traditionally, the Chins were animists, but by the end of the 20th
century as many as 80 percent of them were Christians, mostly Bap-
tists (some sources give a lower percentage). Conversion brought not
only a change in old beliefs (though some aspects of the old religion
could be reconciled with Christianity, such as belief in an afterlife
and Supreme God), but also a social revolution, as tribal society
broke down and was replaced by communities of worshippers,
presided over by new elites of preachers in churches and teachers in
missionary schools, a process that continued up to and even during
World War II, when much of Chin State was a battleground.
The economy of Chin communities has traditionally been based on
swidden (slash-and-burn) agriculture in upland areas. The old reli-
gion was closely tied to the indigenous economy and social system
because sacrifices of cattle and other livestock were seen as neces-
sary to appease the guardian deities and to celebrate major events,
such as a wedding or a successful hunt. Only nobles and chiefs could
afford such ritual sacrifices, so the old religion confirmed social and
economic inequalities.
Apart from trade and slave -raiding, the Chin tribes were largely
isolated from the outside world until the late 19th century, and
their relations with the Burmans (Bamars) were relatively amica-
ble. The Panglong Conference of February 1947 cleared the way
for establishment of a “Chin Special Division” under the Consti-
tution of 1947 (it became Chin State in 1974). Compared to the
Karens (Kayins), Mons, and Kachins, the Chins have lacked a
strong ethnic nationalist insurgency, although the Chin National
06-205 (04) C-F.qxd 7/13/06 7:43 AM Page 148
148 • CHINTHE
for Democracy (NLD) set a deadline of August 21, 1998, for the
State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) to recognize the re-
sults of the General Election of May 27, 1990, and allow a govern-
ment to be formed. When this went unheeded, the NLD, backed by
251 elected representatives, appointed a 10-member Committee Rep-
resenting the People’s Parliament on September 16. The CRPP’s
function is to work “on behalf of the Parliament until a parliamentary
session attended by all the elected representatives is convened.” It
has declared null and void laws decreed by the SPDC and its prede-
cessor, the State Law and Order Restoration Council, as well as
certain pre-1988 laws deemed repressive. The CRPP also established
10 subcommittees dealing with such areas as economics, ethnic na-
tionalities, and foreign affairs. The SPDC, viewing the creation and
actions of the CRPP as a provocation, increased its pressure on the
NLD, including detention of CRPP president Saw Mra Aung. In 2002,
the CRPP’s membership was expanded to 13, adding three represen-
tatives of ethnic minority opposition parties.
Army. During 1989, these forces signed cease-fires with the State
Law and Order Restoration Council regime, and the history of the
Communist Party of Burma was effectively over.
Although its revolution failed, the CPB had a tremendous impact
on Burmese politics. The authoritarian nature of the regime estab-
lished by General Ne Win in 1962 and the Tatmadaw’s monopoliza-
tion of political power were justified largely in terms of the commu-
nist threat, especially after China began giving the CPB a large
amount of aid after 1967. In the 1950s and early 1960s, many uni-
versity students were attracted to communism, and Ne Win sup-
pressed them harshly. By the early 1980s, however, communist in-
fluence in central Burma was virtually nonexistent. Communism had
little or no impact on the events of Democracy Summer in 1988. But
the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) contin-
ued to employ the communist threat to legitimize its hard-line poli-
cies. In 1989, SLORC Secretary-1 Khin Nyunt published a lengthy
tract, Burma Communist Party’s Conspiracy to Take Over State
Power, claiming that student oppositionists were manipulated by a
communist “underground.” Aung Gyi claimed that Daw Aung San
Suu Kyi was influenced by communist members of her National
League for Democracy.
anticipating that they could form the vanguard of a coup attempt. The
plot apparently also included Ne Win’s influential daughter, Sanda
Win, but she was not charged, instead being placed under house ar-
rest. Official accounts are somewhat bizarre: the plotters consulted a
practitioner of astrology to ensure the coup’s success; they possessed
images of the three top SPDC generals, which they apparently
planned to use as “voodoo dolls”; and they were hoping to establish
a new dynasty, complete with a family seal modeled on those of Eu-
ropean royalty. The four plotters were put on trial for high treason
and sentenced to death in September; their December 2002 appeal
was turned down, but it is likely that the death sentences will be com-
muted to life imprisonment.
If this was a genuine attempted coup d’état, it was extraordinarily
clumsy, and posed no real threat to the SPDC. Its relationship to SPDC
internal dynamics is unclear, though a number of high-ranking mili-
tary officers were purged in connection with it. Many observers believe
that Aye Zaw Win and his sons, who were universally disliked, had be-
come so greedy and lawless that some pretext was needed to get rid of
them. Kyaw Ne Win had become notorious as leader of the “Scorpi-
ons,” a criminal gang that terrorized Rangoon residents. Ne Win,
whose reputation was sullied by the incident, passed away on Decem-
ber 5, 2002, marking the end of an era.
CROMBIE PO, SAN (?–1946). Karen (Kayin) leader, best known for
his 1928 Burma and the Karens. After a medical education in the
United States, he returned to Burma in 1894 and worked as a civil
servant until 1902. Appointed a member of Burma’s Legislative
Council in 1915, he emerged as the principal spokesmen for the
Karens in negotiations over future constitutional arrangements, in-
cluding a legally recognized special status for the community in the
legislature. He was a strong advocate of a “Karen country,” separate
from Burma and under British protection. Karens consider him to be
a major figure in their modern history, and his book was reprinted in
2001. See also BA U GYI, SAW; KAREN GOODWILL MISSION
(1946); KAREN NATIONAL UNION.
158 • DAGON
–D–
the State Peace and Development Council in 1997, it has had an ex-
panded enrollment of 1,500. Although the focus is on military sci-
ence, academic and technical courses are also offered, and the DSA
has been significantly upgraded in terms of curriculum and facilities
since 1988. DSA graduates are considered better educated than their
counterparts from the Officers’ Training School. But rivalries be-
tween officers from the two institutions, who comprise the armed
forces high command, have not undermined the basic unity and co-
herence of the Tatmadaw.
Shwe Dagon Pagoda, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi called this uprising
the “second struggle for national independence.” Following the
Burma Socialist Programme Party Extraordinary Congress,
which convened on July 23 and resulted in Ne Win’s retirement and
the selection of Sein Lwin, the “Butcher of Rangoon” (for his role in
the suppression of March and June demonstrations), as his successor,
student activists led by Min Ko Naing proclaimed the Four Eights
Movement of August 8, a general strike aimed at forcing Sein Lwin
to resign. Hundreds of thousands of ordinary townspeople partici-
pated, in Rangoon (Yangon) and elsewhere. Sein Lwin stepped
down on August 12, but only after hundreds of demonstrators had
been killed or wounded by the Tatmadaw in Rangoon, Sagaing, and
other cities.
After the authorities lifted martial law on August 24, the army was
withdrawn from Rangoon, and for a few weeks its citizens enjoyed
unprecedented freedom. The media were not censored; “strike cen-
ters” were set up both in the capital and around the country (in 200
of 314 townships); and new political leaders, of whom the most im-
portant was Daw Suu Kyi, became prominent. After President
Maung Maung promised on September 10 that multiparty elections
would be held, Daw Suu Kyi, U Tin U, and Aung Gyi established a
coalition calling for an interim government (it later became the Na-
tional League for Democracy). But popular rage against suspected
government informers, actions by regime agents provocateurs, and
an economy in chaos contributed to an atmosphere of fear and suspi-
cion. On September 18 the State Law and Order Restoration
Council (SLORC) seized power, killing hundreds more demonstra-
tors and shutting down Democracy Summer. The total number of fa-
talities from July to September 1988 is unknown, since the authori-
ties made no effort to identify the dead or return the remains to their
families. However, it is estimated to have been at least several thou-
sand. Thousands more were held in prison or fled to neighboring
countries.
Although most of the events of Democracy Summer occurred in
Rangoon, there were massive demonstrations in urban centers around
the country. Mandalay was for a brief period governed by a com-
mittee of young monks, students, and workers. However, rural and
ethnic minority areas were largely unaffected. Despite SLORC
06-205 (04) C-F.qxd 7/13/06 7:43 AM Page 162
DEMONETIZATION • 163
164 • DHAMMA
DIVISIONS • 165
DISTRICTS. During the British colonial period, the district was the
“pivot” of regional administration, the responsibility of deputy com-
missioners who had wide-ranging authority. But the district was not
included in the four-level administrative structure defined by the
Constitution of 1974: the national level, the state/division level, the
township level, and the ward/village tract level.
The State Peace and Development Council, however, has rein-
troduced the districts, intermediate between the states/divisions and
the townships, a measure that will probably be formalized by the in-
troduction of a new constitution. The measure has apparently been
adopted to strengthen central government control over the localities.
District-level Peace and Development Councils are the responsibility
of a Tatmadaw officer of lieutenant-colonel rank. Burma, at present,
is divided into 62 districts, further subdivided into 324 townships.
See also ADMINISTRATION OF BURMA, BRITISH COLONIAL
PERIOD; ADMINISTRATION OF BURMA, STATE LAW AND
ORDER RESTORATION COUNCIL/STATE PEACE AND DE-
VELOPMENT COUNCIL ERA.
the national level and above the district and township levels. There
are seven divisions: Bago (Pegu), Irrawaddy (Ayeyarwady),
Magwe (Magway), Mandalay, Rangoon (Yangon), Sagaing, and
Tenasserim (Tanintharyi). At present, each division has a “Peace
and Development Council” composed of Tatmadaw officers, under
the command of the State Peace and Development Council. Under
the Constitution of 1947, they were included in a unitary form of
government and were equivalent to the colonial-era Burma Proper.
The states, corresponding roughly to the Frontier Areas, had quasi-
federal powers, but the distinction between divisions and states
(which also number seven) became administratively and politically
irrelevant after the Constitution of 1974 was adopted.
the courage of those who participated in the 1930 Saya San Rebel-
lion, but they were not attracted to Saya San’s use of traditional Bur-
man (Bamar) royal symbolism and had no intention of supporting the
reestablishment of a Burmese monarchy.
In 1931, the Dobama Asiayone organized a paramilitary wing, the
Dobama Let-yone Tat (Our Burmans Army of Braves), a widespread
practice among political groups at the time (even the Rangoon Uni-
versity Student Union had such a wing), demonstrating that the
Thakins had little enthusiasm for Gandhi’s principle of nonviolent re-
sistance. Their demonstrations during the 1930s tended to be rowdy
attacks on established authority, especially old-line politicians who
cooperated with British colonial rule. Vehemently opposed to the
Government of Burma Act, they set up their own party, the Komin
Kochin Aphwe (“One’s own King, One’s own Kind Association”), to
contest the parliamentary elections held following implementation of
the new constitution. Three of its candidates were elected, largely for
the purpose of disrupting parliamentary proceedings.
In the late 1930s, prominent student activists, including Aung
San and Nu, joined the Dobama Asiayone, which played a prominent
role in the Oil Field Workers’ Strike of 1938. In that same year, the
organization split into two factions, headed by Thakin Thein Maung
and Thakin Ba Sein. The two factions are often described as differ-
ent in ideology: Thein Maung’s, which included Thakins Aung San
and Nu, was “left wing,” while Ba Sein’s was “right-wing” (the lat-
ter included Thakin Shu Maung, later known as Ne Win). The split,
however, had more to do with personalities and power politics than
with political philosophies. A party executive meeting in June 1938
at the Shwe Dagon Pagoda almost ended in a violent confrontation.
The Thakins’ mentor, Thakin Kodaw Hmaing, sought to reconcile
the two groups, but was unsuccessful. In 1939, the Dobama Asiayone
joined Dr. Ba Maw’s Sinyetha Party in the Freedom Bloc, and the
two groups were merged into the Dobama Sinyetha Asiayone during
the Japanese Occupation. Though factionalism and ideological
vagueness undermined its effectiveness, all of Burma’s leaders be-
fore 1988—Aung San, U Nu, and Ne Win—came from its ranks.
DRY ZONE. That part of central Burma located within a “rain shadow”
formed by the Arakan Yoma mountain range, which prevents the
area from receiving the rains of the southwest monsoon. As a result,
rainfall is extremely scarce: about 12.7 centimeters (cm) at Pagan
(Bagan) and 83.8 cm at Mandalay, compared to 292.1 cm in the
delta of the Irrawaddy [Ayeyarwady] River. Paddy rice cultivation
in the Dry Zone is impossible without irrigation. Major crops in the
area include oil seeds (sunflower and sesame), cotton, and ground-
nuts. This harsh environment, semidesert in places and described in
the old chronicles as the “parched land,” has traditionally been the
homeland of the Burmans (Bamars) and the site of their royal cap-
itals, beginning with Pagan in the ninth century and ending with
Mandalay between 1857 and 1885. See also AGRICULTURE; CLI-
MATE.
06-205 (04) C-F.qxd 7/13/06 7:43 AM Page 170
170 • DUWA
–E–
deaths was small, and probably did not greatly exceed official fig-
ures, but that some 30,000 people were in need of emergency aid.
ECONOMY AND ECONOMIC POLICY, BURMA SOCIALIST PROGRAMME PARTY ERA • 173
174 • ECONOMY AND ECONOMIC POLICY, STATE LAW AND ORDER RESTORATION
EDUCATION • 175
EDUCATION. Like other Asian peoples, the Burmese have high es-
teem for education and educated persons. Books are customarily
06-205 (04) C-F.qxd 7/13/06 7:43 AM Page 176
176 • EDUCATION
treated with care (e.g., they should not be placed on the ground), and
the term saya (hsaya), meaning “teacher” in the Burmese (Myan-
mar) language, conveys great respect. Before the colonial era, mem-
bers of the Sangha were the chief custodians of knowledge, and
Buddhist monasteries operated what amounted to a public school
system, giving village boys and girls elementary lessons in literacy,
arithmetic, and the basic principles of the religion. Scholarly monks
were versed in Pali, much as clerics in medieval Europe knew Latin
and Greek. Colonial-era European observers were impressed by the
high literacy rates of the Burmese compared to the peoples of India,
despite the complexities of the writing system.
During the colonial period, education was revolutionized, as the
British introduced secular and scientific curricula. On the elite level,
English supplanted Burmese as the language of instruction. Many
Burmese who could afford it sent their children to missionary insti-
tutions such as the Methodist High School in Rangoon (Yangon).
Among ordinary people “vernacular schools,” which gave instruction
in Burmese or minority languages, drew pupils away from the
monasteries, resulting in a decline in the Sangha’s social prestige.
The monks were unwilling to teach modern subjects like geography
or sciences, perhaps because these subjects contradicted traditional
cosmologies. A much smaller number of “Anglo-vernacular schools”
taught primarily in Burmese, with some courses in English, while
“European Code” schools such as those run by the missionaries
taught in English, with Burmese usually offered as a second lan-
guage.
Following the student strike in protest against the act creating
Rangoon (Yangon) University in 1920, activists established a sys-
tem of nongovernment National Schools offering a curriculum em-
phasizing Burmese language, patriotism, and the Buddhist religion.
They were viewed by the colonial authorities with great suspicion.
Aung San graduated from the national high school in Yenangyaung
(Yaynangyoung) before entering Rangoon University.
In the Frontier Areas inhabited by ethnic minorities, Christian
missionaries promoted their own educational revolution, establishing
schools and nurturing an educated Christian elite among the Karens
(Kayins), Chins, Kachins, and other groups, for whom a community
without both a church and a school was unthinkable. Such education
06-205 (04) C-F.qxd 7/13/06 7:43 AM Page 177
EDUCATION • 177
opened up new worlds for previously isolated and often illiterate “hill
tribes.” Nonindigenous Asian groups, such as the Chinese and Indi-
ans, also had their own schools until the early 1960s.
Although the Burma Socialist Programme Party regime
(1962–1988) was committed to expanding education and promoting
nationwide literacy, it sought to impose a homogeneous educational
system in which there was no place for the cultivation of ethnic or re-
ligious minority identities. All schools were nationalized. Burmese,
rather than minority languages or English, was the primary medium
of instruction; this caused a decline in Burma’s previously high qual-
ity of English-language knowledge that hampered communications
with the outside world. Missionary schools were shut down, their for-
eign teachers sent home. Against a background of economic stagna-
tion, the quality of education overall deteriorated. The inadequacies
of the education system were reflected in the fact that in Rangoon
alone, 1,264 private schools in the early 1980s offered supplementary
lessons to students, compared with 113 state-run high schools and
140 state-run middle schools. A common complaint at the time (and
thereafter) was that middle and high school teachers took “side jobs”
at the private schools to earn extra money and often had little time or
energy for their ordinary students.
After the State Law and Order Restoration Council seized
power in September 1988, the situation further deteriorated. Govern-
ment allocations for education declined, as scarce funds were allo-
cated for rising military expenditures; within Asia, Burma is one of
the countries spending the lowest percentage of its GDP on education
(1.4 percent in 2003). According to official statistics, in 1994–1995
there were 35,856 primary schools employing 169,748 teachers and
educating 5,711,202 students, 2,058 middle schools with 53,859
teachers and 1,390,065 students, and 858 high schools with 18,045
teachers and 389,438 students. UNICEF estimated in 1995 that liter-
acy had fallen to 55 percent of the population (compared to a figure
of 82 percent for males and 71 percent for females reported in the
1983 census, the last taken). Dropout rates are high because parents
cannot afford to keep their children in school, a situation that is worse
in rural than urban areas, and worst in ethnic majority areas near the
country’s borders. UNESCO reports that 45 percent of Burmese chil-
dren fail to complete primary education.
06-205 (04) C-F.qxd 7/13/06 7:43 AM Page 178
Many if not most teachers, whose salaries cannot cover living ex-
penses, continue to supplement their income by tutoring students on
a private basis, either individually or in private cram schools. Full-
time private schools, including those attached to Buddhist monas-
teries, are emerging as alternatives to the public system for people
who can afford them. Also, vocationally oriented schools teaching
computer science, business, and foreign languages are becoming
popular in Rangoon and other cities, though these are essentially
money-making ventures.
Universal education has been the key to the social and economic
development of most Asian countries, and Burma’s lack of progress
in this area bodes ill for its future. See also EDUCATION, HIGHER.
ERA, BURMESE. The Burmese era began in 638 CE, when the Pyu
ruled at Sri Ksetra (Thayakhittaya), so the Burmese equivalent of
2005 CE is 1366–1367. The new year begins in April, with
Thingyan. The year 1300 (1938) witnessed massive demonstrations
against the British colonial rule, and the Burmese consider it signifi-
cant that Democracy Summer occurred exactly 50 years later, in
1350 (1988). The Buddhist era, which began in 543 BCE, is also used
(e.g., 2005 was 2548), as well as the Western system. See also CAL-
ENDAR, BURMESE.
–F–
tem in Burma is nuclear rather than extended, with two or three gen-
erations living together in one household (parents, dependent chil-
dren, sometimes one or more grandparents), and is bilateral rather
than patrilineal, meaning that descent is through both the maternal
and paternal lines. Many observers have noted that Burmese family
life has more in common with that found in Europe and America
rather than in other parts of Asia.
A major consequence of this is that women enjoy considerable
freedom in relation to their husbands and in-laws, although they must
show them deference (the husband is traditionally referred to as ein
oo nat, the “guardian spirit of the house”). Ideally, a newly married
couple will live on their own, but they may live with either the hus-
band’s or the wife’s parents if it is convenient or economical—there
is no strong expectation, as in China, that they remain part of the pa-
ternal household. Although the family is nuclear in structure, ties
with aunts, uncles, cousins, and other more distant kin are usually
strong because of the need for mutual aid, which is as important in a
big city like Rangoon (Yangon) as it is in a small village. Wealthy
people are expected to assist their poorer relations; for example, they
may employ young female relatives as servants and arrange suitable
marriages for them. For most Burmese in the early 21st century, the
family system provides psychological and material support in what is
often a harsh and unforgiving environment, where social services are
practically nonexistent.
FORCE 136. The Far Eastern branch of the British Special Operations
Executive (SOE). Its mission in Burma and other parts of Southeast
Asia was to organize local resistance against the Japanese during
World War II. Largely through the work of Major Hugh Seagrim, it
organized Karen (Kayin) guerrillas in the hill country east of the Sit-
tang (Sittoung) River; and, with the cooperation of Communist
Party of Burma operatives, especially Thein Pe Myint, made con-
tact with the underground Anti-Fascist Organization among the
Burmans (Bamars). Force 136 made extensive use of “Jedburgh
Teams,” consisting of two British officers and a wireless operator
who were parachuted behind enemy lines. The effectiveness of Karen
guerrillas during the 1945 Allied thrust into Burma and the uprising
of the Burma National Army against the Japanese on March 27
were vindications of Force 136’s underground activities, which were
regarded with some skepticism by other elements of the British gov-
ernment and army. See also ARMED FORCES DAY; AUNG SAN;
JAPANESE OCCUPATION.
they did in other Asian countries and in many parts of Europe before
the French Revolution. Often, such exactions were highly oppressive,
such as during the reign of King Bodawpaya (r. 1782–1819), who
used corvée labor on ambitious public projects in Upper Burma, in-
cluding construction of a huge pagoda at Mingun. The British im-
posed some labor service obligations (the Village and Towns Acts of
1907–1908, although these required the payment of a wage), and the
Japanese used hundreds of thousands of Burmese and other Asian ro-
musha (“labor service workers”) on construction of the Thai–Burma
Railway (the “Death Railway”) and other war-related projects be-
tween 1942 and 1945. After independence in 1948, the Tatmadaw
used forced labor in counterinsurgency operations, and following the
establishment of the Caretaker Government in October 1958 and
the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) in Sep-
tember 1988, the new military authorities drafted residents of Ran-
goon (Yangon) to clean up the city.
Forced labor—state- or military-imposed labor without any form
of compensation—has become especially prevalent since 1988, in
contravention of a 1930 resolution by the International Labour Orga-
nization (ILO) that categorically bans its use. It generally occurs in
two contexts: in connection with Tatmadaw counterinsurgency oper-
ations in ethnic minority regions, especially in contested areas of
Shan, Mon, Karen (Kayin), and Kayah (Karenni) States; and in
infrastructure projects unrelated, or indirectly related, to the war
against ethnic armed groups. The first is generally more onerous: Mi-
nority villagers are rounded up to serve as military porters, often un-
der very dangerous conditions, and are sometimes used as “human
mine sweepers” or “human shields” in operations against insurgents.
The death rate is high, women porters are often sexually abused, and
families suffer economically because able-bodied people taken away
for porterage, often for very long periods of time, are unavailable for
farming.
Since 1988, the government has promoted the construction of new
highways, bridges, and dams, routinely using forced labor. Some proj-
ects, such as the railway between Ye and Tavoy (Dawei), described as
a second “Death Railway,” and the Yadana Pipeline Project, built
with foreign investment, have exacted a high cost in worker fatali-
ties, while others, such as forcing residents of Mandalay to clean up
06-205 (04) C-F.qxd 7/13/06 7:43 AM Page 186
known as the State Peace and Development Council) and the lack
of firm legal guarantees of property rights. In precolonial times,
Burma’s land was considered the property of the king, and post-
independence constitutions have asserted that land rights rest ulti-
mately with the state. The most extensive forced relocations have oc-
curred in ethnic minority areas, in connection with the Tatmadaw’s
counterinsurgency operations. In the mid-1990s, at least 300,000 per-
sons in eight townships in central Shan State were forced to leave
their villages and resettle in military-controlled sites that resembled
the “strategic hamlets” of the Vietnam War. This policy was an ap-
plication of the “Four Cuts,” designed to eliminate popular bases of
support for insurgents, in this case the Shan State Army. Relocation
of villagers on a large scale has also occurred in Karen (Kayin),
Kayah (Karenni), Mon, and Arakan (Rakhine) States.
Urban forced relocation, involving mostly Burmans, can be traced
back to the Caretaker Government of 1958–1960, which moved
some 170,000 squatters and other poor people out of central Ran-
goon (Yangon) to new townships in Thaketa and North and South
Okkalapa. After the SLORC seized power, several hundred thou-
sand people (no exact figure is available) were moved from down-
town Rangoon to other new towns, such as North and South Dagon
and Hlaing Thayar, located beyond the old city limits. Most, though
not all, of these moves were involuntary. The government took the
measure to ensure that popular uprisings like Democracy Summer
would not recur, since not only squatters but communities where pro-
testers were sheltered, including people living in substantial housing,
were singled out for relocation. In another case of relocation, the
Main Campus of Rangoon (Yangon) University, a center of protest
in 1988, has been largely closed down, and most undergraduates pur-
sue their studies at distant outlying campuses, such as Dagon Uni-
versity, a policy designed to keep concentrations of students distant
from city residents.
Construction of new highways and other facilities under the spon-
sorship of the Yangon City Development Committee has resulted in
additional relocations; as highways are widened and improved, adja-
cent houses are torn down and replaced with multistory structures.
City residents living on prime land slated for development by private
but junta-connected firms have little or no legal recourse to prevent
06-205 (04) C-F.qxd 7/13/06 7:43 AM Page 188
the belief that eight is an inauspicious number for rulers; in the “three
eights” year of the Burmese Era (888; 1526–1527 CE), Ava (Inwa)
fell to the Shan (Tai) usurper, Thohanbwa, beginning an era of anar-
chy and destruction. See also ALL BURMA FEDERATION OF STU-
DENT UNIONS; DEMOCRACY SUMMER; MIN KO NAING.
GALON • 195
–G–
GOLF • 201
dha was born. Direct descent from the Maha Thamada, the first
king, was also claimed. The Glass Palace Chronicles were not in-
tended to present an objective view of history, but rather to glorify the
dynasty established by Alaungpaya (r. 1752–1760), who, however,
seems to have been of rather humble origin.
HANTHAWADDY • 203
–H–
204 • HAW
HEALTH • 205
HEROIN. A narcotic derived and refined from the latex of the opium
poppy (Papaver somniferum). Its various grades, usually injected into
the bloodstream with a needle, are much stronger and more addictive
than opium, which is usually smoked. Not only are large amounts of
heroin refined in laboratories inside Burma and exported to foreign
countries, but heroin addiction has also become a serious domestic
problem. Although some heroin abuse was recorded in Burma’s
larger cities during the Ne Win era (1962–1988), it expanded rapidly
06-205 (05) G-K.qxd 7/13/06 7:44 AM Page 207
HONGSA • 207
208 • HPAKANT
210 • HSIPAW
at Kaungton that stabilized relations but angered the king, who wanted
the Chinese force exterminated. He invaded the small state of Ma-
nipur in northeastern India, placing his nominee on the throne, but
the war in Siam (Thailand) was going badly, and the Mons staged up-
risings in Lower Burma. Siam, which grew powerful under the
Chakri Dynasty established in 1782, was never again conquered by
the Burmese. See also KENG TUNG.
out before finishing high school. Universities have been closed for
long periods since 1988; when open, they operate under heavy re-
strictions. Lack of rational economic planning on the part of the gov-
ernment keeps both rural and urban populations desperately poor in an
inflationary economy, spawning social problems such as the entry of
poor women into the domestic and international sex industry and a
flourishing drug economy.
Forced labor and forced relocation affect millions of Burmese,
including both Burmans and ethnic minorities. The use of child sol-
diers in the Tatmadaw is also widespread, and insurgents recruit them
as well.
The SPDC’s reaction to international criticism of its human rights
record has been to deny the allegations or argue that some practices,
such as forced labor (described as labor contributions), are a part of
Burma’s traditions. At times, the government has shown some re-
sponsiveness to outside criticism, such as negotiating with the Inter-
national Labour Organization over the issue of forced labor in
2000–2002, and allowing the International Committee of the Red
Cross to visit political prisoners since 1999. The government of Aus-
tralia has sent experts to train Burmese officials in human rights
awareness. Since 1988, there has been little evidence that such con-
cessions represent a significant change in junta attitudes about basic
human rights. See also INSEIN JAIL; MIN KO NAING; TAT-
MADAW AND BURMESE SOCIETY.
–I–
Front, which has not signed a cease-fire with the SPDC, has bases
in India’s Mizoram State, where the local people are ethnically the
same as the Chins. Agreements between the Indian and Burmese mil-
itaries have enabled them to carry out joint operations against these
groups and to more effectively halt the flow of Burmese drugs across
the Indian border. To develop the border area, India has given aid to
construct infrastructure, such as an Indo-Myanmar Friendship Road
connecting Chin State with Moreh in Mizoram.
Third, India now has substantial economic interests in Burma.
Two-way trade in 1997–1998 totaled US$264.7 million. Principal
Burmese exports to India are beans, pulses, and wood products, while
Burma imports manufactured goods, such as iron and steel, pharma-
ceuticals, and chemicals. Trade also flourishes at the border. In 2004,
it was announced that a natural gas field, the “Shwe [Gold] Prospect”
in the Bay of Bengal off Arakan State, which is being developed by
South Korean and Indian oil firms in cooperation with the Myanmar
Oil and Gas Enterprise, would start production in 2009, providing In-
dia with natural gas piped either through Arakan to Assam or by way
of Bangladesh to West Bengal. The Shwe Prospect will provide
much-needed energy for India’s rapid industrialization and earn the
SPDC between US$800 million and US$3 billion in profits each
year. India and Burma are both members of the BIMSTEC
(“Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Thai Economic Coop-
eration) group. See also INDIA AND BURMA.
INDIANS IN BURMA. During the British colonial era, the Indian pop-
ulation of Burma (“Indian” in this context refers to South Asians, per-
sons from what are now India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan) increased
rapidly because to British encouragement of immigration to provide
cheap labor for the modern colonial economy and Indians’ perception
that the country was a land of opportunity, where they could escape
the crushing poverty of home. Even after the Government of Burma
Act was implemented in 1937, separating Burma from India, there
were no effective curbs on Indian immigration until the eve of World
War II. According to the 1931 census, Indians numbered more than
one million, mostly in Lower Burma, and comprised 7 percent of the
country’s total population. Rangoon (Yangon) was primarily a South
Asian city: 54.9 percent of its people came from the Subcontinent,
06-205 (05) G-K.qxd 7/13/06 7:44 AM Page 219
INLE LAKE. Located in western Shan State, home to the Intha peo-
ple and since British colonial days one of Burma’s major tourist at-
tractions. Inle Lake extends in a north-south direction, is approxi-
mately 17–18 kilometers long and 5–6 kilometers wide, and is at an
elevation of 875 meters above sea level. Its shores and islands are
densely populated, with about 150,000 people living there, and the
area is a major producer of rice, vegetables, and fruit. Many crops are
grown on “floating islands,” which are masses of soil tied together
with strands of water hyacinth. It is also a major center for silk weav-
ing, comparable to Amarapura. The major town is Yawnghwe
(Nyaungshwe), the capital of one of the old Shan States. Best
known to tourists for its “leg rowers,” fishermen who use one leg to
row their narrow wooden boats while dropping their conical nets over
the fish below, Inle Lake is also the location of the Phaung Daw U
Paya, an important Shan (Tai) Buddhist site.
224 • INTHAS
inside the country. The major sources of investment capital in the late
1990s were, in descending order of magnitude: Singapore (US$1.49
billion), Britain (US$1.35 billion), Thailand (US$1.24 billion),
Malaysia (US$587 million), the United States (US$582 million),
France (US$470 million), the Netherlands (US$238 million), In-
donesia (US$236 million), and Japan (US$219 million). The largest
single investment was the US$1.2 billion Yadana Pipeline Project,
a French–American–Thai joint venture with the Myanmar Oil and
Gas Enterprise to supply Thailand with natural gas. Investment sta-
tistics for 2003–2004 reveal commitments by South Korea ($34.9
million), Britain ($27 million), Thailand ($22 million), Hong Kong
($3 million), China ($2.8 million), and Canada ($1.5 million). Statis-
tics on real Chinese investment since 1988 may be understated. See
also ECONOMY AND ECONOMIC POLICY, STATE LAW AND
ORDER RESTORATION COUNCIL/STATE PEACE AND DE-
VELOPMENT COUNCIL ERA.
–J–
JAPAN, RELATIONS WITH. Before World War II, Japan had rather
small-scale trade and cultural relations with Burma. On the eve of the
war, such prominent politicians as U Saw and Ba Maw cultivated
friendly ties with Japanese diplomats and undercover agents as a
means of gaining external support for the struggle against British colo-
nialism, and the Minami Kikan gave military training to the Thirty
Comrades led by Aung San in 1941; Colonel Suzuki Keiji estab-
lished the Burma Independence Army as Burma’s first postcolonial
06-205 (05) G-K.qxd 7/13/06 7:44 AM Page 228
the SLORC’s house arrest of Aung San Suu Kyi in 1989 and its re-
fusal to transfer power after the General Election of May 27, 1990
aroused strong criticism from Washington and other Western govern-
ments. However, Japan did not enact sanctions against the regime,
refraining from funding new aid projects but allowing old ones to
continue on a case-by-case basis. After 1988, Tokyo also forgave
much of Burma’s yen-denominated debt through debt-relief grants.
Inside Japan, many critics saw their government’s Burma policy as
ambiguous and opportunistic, but foreign ministry spokesmen
claimed that although Japan and the United States shared the same
goal, Burma’s democratization, the means were different, that is,
Japan was pursuing a “sunshine policy” rather than sanctions and
harsh criticism. However, Japan’s Burma policy was frequently diffi-
cult to decipher; for example, funds for modernization of Rangoon’s
Mingaladon Airport were disbursed under the inappropriate and
confusing category “humanitarian aid” in the late 1990s.
China has gained influence in the country at Japan’s expense since
1988. Presently, Japanese leaders emphasize the importance of deep-
ening ties with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
(ASEAN) as a way of counteracting Beijing’s growing influence in
Southeast Asia as a whole; since Burma joined ASEAN in 1997,
Tokyo’s Burma policy has taken a regional, ASEAN perspective (for
example, Khin Nyunt was invited to attend the Japan–ASEAN Sum-
mit in Tokyo in 2003 in his capacity as prime minister). With its rich
natural resources, the country remains important to Japan’s economic
strategies.
Japanese often claim that Burma is the “friendliest country in Asia
toward Japan” because of wartime experiences, a common religion
(Buddhism), and shared values. Takeyama Michio’s novel, Harp of
Burma, a perennial best seller, is a sentimental story about Japanese
soldiers’ wartime sacrifices, and war veterans have visited the country
regularly to collect the remains and pray over the graves of their fallen
comrades. Aung San Suu Kyi studied at Kyoto University during the
mid-1980s. Since 1988, 10,000 Burmese exiles, many of whom are ac-
tive in the prodemocracy movement with the support of sympathetic
Japanese citizens, have established residence in Japan. See also
JAPANESE OCCUPATION: TATMADAW, HISTORY OF; WORLD
WAR II IN BURMA (MILITARY OPERATIONS).
06-205 (05) G-K.qxd 7/13/06 7:44 AM Page 230
234 • KA KWE YE
–K–
236 • KACHINS
Hukawng Valley and the plains around the towns of Putao, Myitkyina,
and Bhamo. The state contains the headwaters of the Irrawaddy
(Ayeyarwady) River, which is navigable up to Bhamo, and Indawgyi
Lake, Burma’s largest. To the south, Kachin State is bounded by Shan
State, and on the west by Sagaing Division. It also has a long eastern
border with the People’s Republic of China and a shorter western one
with India.
Ethnically, the population includes the many subgroups of the
Kachin ethnic group, especially the Jingpaws, as well as Shans (Tai)
and Burmans (Bamars). Until the early 1990s, when a cease-fire
was signed with the State Law and Order Restoration Council,
much of the state’s territory was controlled by the Kachin Indepen-
dence Army, one of the best-organized antigovernment insurgencies.
The rough terrain limits agricultural potential, except in the plains,
but Kachin State is richly endowed with forests (though massive ex-
port of logs to China is causing serious deforestation) and has large
deposits of jadeite (jade), especially at Hpakant, which finds ready
markets in China and among Chinese communities in Southeast Asia.
Other exploitable minerals include amber, gold, and iron. Small
amounts of opium have been cultivated in Kachin State.
KACHINS • 237
238 • KACHINS
are skilled weavers, and many of their patterns have enjoyed great pop-
ularity in other parts of Burma.
Anthropologists, most notably Edmund Leach (in Political Sys-
tems of Highland Burma), have described in detail two contrasting
social systems within Kachin society: the gumsa, a hierarchical sys-
tem in which hereditary chiefs (duwa) exercised authority over vil-
lage communities, possibly influenced by Shan political institutions
(the sawbwa); and the gumlao, a more horizontal or egalitarian sys-
tem in which authority was exercised by a local council. The British
suppressed the gumlao because they were associated with rebellion
against authority. The colonizers also outlawed the practice of slav-
ery, which was widespread in Kachin society before the early 20th
century.
Like other upland, Tibeto-Burman groups (such as the Chins), the
Kachins believed in a single creator God (Karai Kasang), and below
him a host of often malevolent spirits similar to the Burmese nats.
Very few Kachins became Buddhists. Christian missionaries, espe-
cially those associated with the American Baptist church, began evan-
gelizing in the mid- and late 19th century. The Swedish-American
Baptist missionary Ola Hanson, who worked among Kachins be-
tween 1890 and 1929, played a major role not only in converting the
people to Christianity but also in developing the Kachin language,
giving it a written script and translating the entire Bible into Jingpaw
Kachin (using the term Karai Kasang for God). The written lan-
guage, using Roman rather than Burmese letters, has been instru-
mental in promoting literacy and ethnic consciousness among the
Kachins. Although exact figures on the number of Christians among
the Kachins are not available, they are estimated to comprise over 90
percent of the population, with Baptists and Catholics being the
largest groups. Christian churches and schools have become major
institutions in Kachin life. Since all three Kachin armed groups—the
KIO/KIA, the Kachin Defence Army, and the New Democratic
Army-Kachin—signed cease-fires with the State Law and Order
Restoration Council in the 1990s, Kachin communities have en-
joyed peace for the first time since the KIO/KIA revolt broke out in
the early 1960s, but the price has been environmental spoilage and
social problems caused by rampant commercialization and the in-
creased influence of the central government, including the State
06-205 (05) G-K.qxd 7/13/06 7:44 AM Page 239
Crombie Po and Sydney Loo Nee, hoped to use the KNA to advance
the interests of their community within the British Empire. When the
Montagu-Chelmsford hearings on political reform for India were
held in 1917, the KNA opposed the aspirations of the Young Men’s
Buddhist Association by arguing that the Province of Burma, be-
cause of its ethnic diversity, was not ready for self-government. The
KNA lobbied for special communal representation for the Karens in
the colonial legislature, and by the late 1920s had begun to advocate
a separate “Karen country,” to be located in what is now Tenasserim
(Tanintharyi) Division, which would be under British rule in a
decentralized Burmese federation of nationalities. Dominated by
Western-educated Christians, it was only in 1939 that the KNA es-
tablished a parallel association for Karen Buddhists, who in fact were
a majority within the Karen community. See also KAREN NA-
TIONAL UNION (KNU).
During the 1950s and 1960s, the KNU underwent factional divisions,
largely along communist and anticommunist lines. A Marxist-oriented
Karen National United Party (KNUP) was established with its own
armed force, the Karen (or Kawthoolei) People’s Liberation Army
(KPLA), which increasingly adopted Maoist-style guerrilla tactics. The
KNUP and a second group, the Karen Revolutionary Council (KRC),
participated in peace talks with the Ne Win regime in 1963, but only
the KRC, led by the antileftist Saw Hunter Thamwe, agreed to lay down
their arms. By the late 1960s, the left-leaning KNUP and the Karen Na-
tional United Front (KNUF), founded and led by Saw Bo Mya, were the
major components and rivals within the Karen insurgency. In
1975–1976, the two factions were reunited as the Karen National Union
under Bo Mya, who rejected Marxism in favor of a nationalist, anti-
communist stance and purged leftists from the movement.
The KNU maintained a large administrative network in its liber-
ated areas along the border between Burma and Thailand. Econom-
ically, it depended on the exploitation of extensive stands of teak,
logs being exported to Thailand, and control of the black market
trade between the two countries, consisting of consumer and manu-
factured goods brought in over the border from Thailand in exchange
for Burmese raw materials. The major outlet for trade was Three
Pagodas Pass, controlled and sometimes contested by the KNU and
the New Mon State Party. The KNU refrained from participating in
the profitable trade in opium and other narcotics, because of both the
convictions of its leaders and the historical unfamiliarity of the
Karens with the drug. By the early 1980s, the KNU’s armed force, the
Karen National Liberation Army (KNLA), had a well-trained and
equipped force of between 5,000 and 8,000 men, second only to the
People’s Army of the CPB, which had 8,000–15,000 men under arms.
The KNU became a member of the National Democratic Front in
1976, and of the Democratic Alliance of Burma in 1988.
The KNU and other ethnic minority armed groups did not partici-
pate in the Democracy Summer movement of 1988, but after Burman
student activists, who established the All Burma Students Demo-
cratic Front, left central Burma for the border areas, they were in-
cluded in the DAB united front under Bo Mya’s leadership and assisted
by the KNLA, which gave them training and some arms. Because the
KNU’s headquarters at Manerplaw, established in 1975, was also a
06-205 (05) G-K.qxd 7/13/06 7:44 AM Page 244
focal point for other ethnic minority and Burman opposition groups, in-
cluding the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma
(NCGUB), the Tatmadaw made it the target of concerted dry-season
offensives, especially during 1992 and 1995. The latter offensive suc-
ceeded in capturing Manerplaw and another base, Kawmoorah, deal-
ing the KNU/KNLA a serious blow. An important factor in their suc-
cess was the defection of the Democratic Buddhist Karen Army
(DKBA) from the KNU. The increasingly cooperative attitude of the
Thai government toward the State Law and Order Restoration
Council in the early 1990s also denied KNLA soldiers sanctuary on
Thai soil. Manerplaw’s fall resulted in an increased number of Karen
refugees fleeing to KNU-affiliated camps in Thailand, and left those
remaining behind vulnerable to systematic human rights abuses by
the Tatmadaw. As of 2005, the KNU, led formally since 2000 by Saw
Ba Thin, had not signed a cease-fire with the State Peace and Devel-
opment Council. Despite the growing receptiveness of Bo Mya, still
the KNU’s de facto leader, to a negotiated end to the war, the central
government remained unwilling in early 2005 to make concessions that
the Karen movement would find acceptable.
246 • KARENNIS
KARENS • 247
248 • KARENS
KAWTHOOLAY • 249
also used the term to refer to Karen (Kayin) State from 1964 to
1974.
KHANTI, U • 251
the Shan (Tai) ethnic group, Keng Tung traces its origins to the late
13th century, when the fortified city (möng in the Shan language)
was established by a Tai ruler related to the royal family of Chiang
Mai. The original inhabitants of the Keng Tung area were apparently
Wa, although the most numerous “hill tribe” people are Akha.
In the late 1760s, conflicting claims of suzerainty over Keng Tung
were among the causes of a war between King Hsinbyushin and the
Manchu Ch’ing (Qing) Dynasty. The city has long been an important
waystation in the trade between China and Thailand. A 19th-century
British account tells of an annual traffic of 8,000 mules bringing Chi-
nese goods by way of Keng Tung to Chiang Mai. During the British
colonial period the sawbwa of Keng Tung, like his counterparts in
other Shan States, enjoyed considerable autonomy. During World
War II, the Japanese transferred suzerainty over Keng Tung and an-
other Shan State, Mongpan, to Thailand.
After Burma became independent in 1948, Keng Tung suffered
heavily from war, insurgency, and, after 1988, the full impact of mil-
itary rule. In the early 1990s, the State Law and Order Restoration
Council opened an overland route for foreign travelers from Mae Sai
on the Thai–Burma border to Keng Tung, and the city is likely to play
an important role in the development of highway links connecting
eastern and northern Shan State with Thailand and China. The head-
quarters of the Triangle Regional Military Command of the Tat-
madaw is located there, and the Keng Tung area is subject to heavy
cultural “Burmanization.”
Among Keng Tung’s monuments are the Wat Zom Kham, which
according to legend dates from the lifetime of Gotama Buddha and
is said to contain six of his hairs, the Naung Tung Lake in the center
of town, and the old city gate (the city was originally surrounded by
a wall). Keng Tung is famous for its lacquerware. Over the protests
of local people, the ornate haw or palace of the sawbwa was torn
down by the military regime in 1991 and replaced by a tourist hotel.
KHIN KYI, DAW (1912–1988). Wife and widow of Aung San and
mother of Aung San Suu Kyi. A nurse, she tended to Aung San dur-
ing an illness and married him in 1942, bearing him two sons and a
daughter. She was a prominent member of the All Burma Women’s
Freedom League and the Anti-Fascist People’s Freedom League,
and served as director of social welfare in the government headed by
U Nu. From 1960 to 1967, she was Burma’s ambassador to India, the
first Burmese woman to serve in an ambassadorial post. A strict
mother, she had a formidable influence on her daughter, inculcating
in her respect for traditional values.
Daw Khin Kyi’s illness brought her daughter to Rangoon (Yan-
gon) in 1988. After she died on December 27 of that year, hundreds
of thousands of people attended her funeral, including Western am-
bassadors.
254 • KHUN SA
256 • KOKANG
Bagyidaw 1819
Tharrawaddy 1838
Pagan Min 1846
Mindon Min 1853
Thibaw 1878 (to 1885)
Source: D. G. E. Hall, A History of South-East Asia. London: Macmillan, 1964.
KUTHO • 259
KOYIN. Or kouyin, a novice member of the Sangha, who has not been
ordained. Traditionally, most Burmese boys spend at least a short
time in a monastery as a koyin, following an elaborate shinbyu cere-
mony, the most important rite of passage for Burmese Buddhist
males.
KYAIK. A word for pagoda or Buddhist holy site in the Mon language
(equivalent to paya in Burmese), used in the names of some pagodas
in Lower Burma, where Mon kingdoms ruled before the mid-18th
century. They include Kyaiktiyo in Mon State and Kyaik Pun in
Pegu (Bago). Though less commonly used today than their Burmese
(Myanmar) language names, Kyaik Dagon/Kyaik Lagun is the Mon
name of the Shwe Dagon Pagoda, Kyaik Athok that of the Sule
Pagoda, and Kyaik Mawdaw that of the Shwemawdaw.
KYAUKSE • 261
with a legendary visit by the Buddha to Burma, and the pagoda in-
cludes the boulder in which the hair was placed, which was allegedly
lifted up to the edge of the cliff by Thagya Min, king of the gods. In
the Buddhist cycle of legends, the Kyaiktiyo is closely associated
with the Shwe Dagon Pagoda in Rangoon (Yangon). Because of its
religious importance, the State Peace and Development Council
sponsored extensive renovations of the site in 2001. See also AR-
CHITECTURE, RELIGIOUS.
–L–
LAHUS • 263
A fourth verse form, yadu, were short poems, one to three stanzas
long, on a wider variety of themes, including nature, romantic love,
and the experiences of soldiers in war. During the Toungoo Dynasty
(1555–1752), yadu poetry flourished, the most renowned poets being
Nawaday the Elder (1545–1600) and Prince Nat Shin-naung (1578–
1619). The early 18th-century writer Padei-tha-ya-za (1633–1754)
composed pyo on nonreligious themes and also wrote about the com-
mon people. After the conquest of Ayuthaya, the capital of Siam, by
King Hsinbyushin in 1767, Burmese literature was strongly influ-
enced by Siamese (Yodaya) styles. During the 19th century, new lit-
erary forms emerged, including the yagan, a long narrative poem, and
the pya-zat, or drama. Important writers included U Sa (1766–1853),
Letwet Thondara, the Hlaing Princess, and the dramatist U Ponnya
(1812–1867). During the late Konbaung period, dramas were ex-
tremely popular, and printed plays became bestsellers, in some sense
anticipating the novels and short stories of the colonial and postcolo-
nial eras. Between 1875 and 1900, 400 pya-zat were written and pub-
lished.
Historical literature was in the form of thamaing, the histories of
pagodas, monasteries, or local districts, and yazawin, or royal chron-
icles (rajavamsa in Pali). U Kala (1678–1738) produced the Maha
Yazawin-gyi (the Great Chronicle) in 1724, covering the period from
the legendary beginning of the Burmese kingdom until 1711. King
Bagyidaw commissioned a group of scholars to compile an official
history, the Hman-nan Yazawin-daw-gyi (Glass Palace Chronicle)
between 1829 and 1832, based largely on U Kala’s work. A supple-
ment to this was commissioned by King Mindon but not published
until 1899. See also LITERATURE, BURMESE (MODERN).
LOIKAW • 273
lishers in 1971 turned out a total of 2,106 titles; this number had
fallen to 584 titles by 1976.
After the State Law and Order Restoration Council seized
power in 1988, the severe and arbitrary censorship regime under the
Press Scrutiny Board continued, and a number of writers, including
the distinguished poet Tin Moe, have since been jailed or have left the
country. Few observers of the Burmese literary scene believe that
quality literature can be produced under these circumstances, al-
though the volume of publications has grown compared to the Ne
Win period. See also LITERATURE, BURMESE (DYNASTIC PE-
RIOD); MASS MEDIA IN BURMA.
274 • LONGYI
LOWER BURMA. A term first used by the British in the 19th century
to refer to those territories annexed following the First and Second
Anglo-Burmese Wars (1824–1826, 1852), in contrast to Upper
06-205 (06) L-N.qxd 7/13/06 7:46 AM Page 275
LWIN, U • 275
Burma, which was ruled by the Konbaung Dynasty until the Third
Anglo-Burmese War (1885). Lower Burma was frequently also re-
ferred to as “Pegu,” the region’s most prominent city until Rangoon
(Yangon) became Burma’s colonial capital; after the 1852 war, it in-
cluded Arakan (Rakhine), Tenasserim (Tanintharyi), the Ir-
rawaddy (Ayeyarwady) River Delta, and most of what are now
Mon State and Pegu (Bago) Division. The terms Lower and Upper
Burma are still often used because the areas they denote retain a
strong regional distinctiveness. Historically, Lower Burma, home of
the Mons, has been a sea-girt, well-watered area where international
trade and rice cultivation have been highly developed since antiquity.
During the colonial period, it was characterized by ethnic diversity
and cosmopolitanism, including a large population of migrants from
India, in contrast to Upper Burma, which was more isolated and eth-
nically homogeneous. Both regions constituted Burma Proper, in
contrast to the Frontier Areas. See also ADMINISTRATION OF
BURMA, BRITISH COLONIAL PERIOD.
–M–
280 • MANDALAY
the Sittang (Sittoung) River flow south from the division. Elongated
in a north–south direction, its northern arm includes Mogok
(Mogoke), a famous center of ruby mining. Major crops include rice,
millet, groundnuts, oil seeds (sesame and sunflower), pulses, beans,
toddy (sugar) palm, and cotton. Mandalay Division has significant in-
dustry, including factories for the production of such consumer goods
as textiles, soft drinks, and canned goods, and the rail transport
workshops at Myitnge. Since the 1990s, industrial estates have been
established in Mandalay city. Forestry is also economically impor-
tant, and the town of Kyaukpadaung is a hub for highway transporta-
tion.
Located in the Burman (Bamar) heartland (Upper Burma),
Mandalay Division is the site of many of the country’s old royal cap-
itals: Mandalay, Pagan (Bagan) in Nyaung-U District, Ava (Inwa),
and Amarapura. Even after the British shifted the center of political
and economic power to Rangoon (Yangon), these towns have re-
mained important as places where traditional art, culture, and man-
ners are preserved. For example, Amarapura is a center for traditional
silk weaving, and marble Buddha images are carved at Sagyin out-
side of Mandalay. Most of the population are Burmans, though there
are smaller numbers of Shans and other indigenous ethnic minorities,
and an undetermined (though probably large) population of migrants
from the People’s Republic of China. In 2005, the SPDC announced
that a new national capital would be built at Pyinmana, in the south-
ern part of Mandalay Division, and relocation of personnel com-
menced in November of that year.
MANERPLAW • 283
284 • MANIPUR
MEIKTILA • 289
nest soup,” a Chinese delicacy that can fetch high prices in Hong
Kong and Singapore. Pearls are found in offshore waters; the once-
abundant marine life has been over-fished in recent years, often by
fishermen using dynamite.
in the General Election of May 27, 1990. However, after the State
Law and Order Restoration Council was established in September
1988, MI underwent a major expansion in terms of manpower, equip-
ment, and new technology (much of which was obtained from China,
Singapore, and other countries). After 1992, its command structure
operated independently of the regular Tatmadaw. At the beginning of
the 21st century, it had the capability to carry out sophisticated
HUMINT (Human Intelligence, e.g., agents, informers), SIGINT
(Signals Intelligence, monitoring communications), and even IMINT
([overhead] Imagery Intelligence, using aircraft) operations against
domestic and foreign targets.
Because the SLORC/SPDC enjoys little or no popular support,
Military Intelligence became indispensable for keeping it in power.
Not only the regime’s “eyes and ears” but also its “brains,” it in-
formed the top junta leadership, who are largely uneducated and ig-
norant of the outside world, about the latest domestic and interna-
tional developments, carrying out a function that in other political
systems would be done by not only intelligence agencies but also po-
litical analysts, agencies of the executive and legislative branches of
government, and independent mass media. However, the efficiency
of its operations was hampered by the wide range of its responsibili-
ties and the limited resources available to it.
On October 18, 2004, MI commander Khin Nyunt was arrested on
charges of corruption and attempting to split the Tatmadaw. His sud-
den, though not entirely unexpected, fall from power left the intelli-
gence apparatus in disarray because as many as 2,000 of his subordi-
nates were also arrested or forced into retirement. The purge was
motivated by intra-junta factional rivalries, and Khin Nyunt’s rivals,
including Generals Maung Aye and Soe Win, with the backing of
Senior General Than Shwe, apparently believed Khin Nyunt was
building a “junta within the junta,” which endangered their own
power base. One result of the dismantling of the MI apparatus was an
amnesty extended to thousands of prisoners, but only a handful of
these were political prisoners, and there was no evidence that the
SPDC was softening its attitude toward Aung San Suu Kyi and her
supporters.
On May 7, 2005, three bomb blasts at crowded shopping centers in
Rangoon killed, according to official reports, 11 people, although the
06-205 (06) L-N.qxd 7/13/06 7:46 AM Page 294
actual figure may have been much higher. In a sense, this was history
repeating itself, for, like the October 1983 Rangoon Incident, it oc-
curred at a time when the Military Intelligence apparatus was in dis-
array following its leader’s arrest. However, unlike the 1983 bomb-
ings, it was unclear who the perpetrators were. The regime blamed
foreign-based opposition groups, but some observers speculated that
elements within the military, perhaps reacting to the purge of Khin
Nyunt and his subordinates, may have been responsible. See also DI-
RECTORATE OF DEFENSE SERVICES INTELLIGENCE; MILI-
TARY INTELLIGENCE, ORGANIZATION OF; NATIONAL IN-
TELLIGENCE BUREAU; OFFICE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES.
MIN BIN, KING (r. 1531–1553). Also known as Man Pa, ruler of
Arakan (Rakhine), whose reign witnessed the country’s emergence
as a major power. He established close ties with the Portuguese and
was able to take advantage of their superior shipbuilding techniques
and firearms to fortify his capital, Mrauk-U, and build a strong navy
that conducted both trade and piracy in the Bay of Bengal. Por-
tuguese served as officers in Min Bin’s army, which consisted of mer-
cenaries from a number of European and Asian countries. Min Bin
not only imposed Arakanese control over eastern Bengal, including
the port of Chittagong, but also successfully repulsed an invasion by
the Burman King Tabinshwehti in 1546–1547. He was the builder of
one of Arakan’s most important Buddhist monuments, the Shit-
thaung (Sittaung) temple.
troupe during Thingyan, which satirized the regime and its corrupt
practices. He gave a speech at the university’s Main Campus on
March 16, 1988, and participated in the demonstration that ended
with the White Bridge Incident. A founder of the All Burma Fed-
eration of Student Unions (ABFSU), he issued the proclamation an-
nouncing the Four Eights Movement, a general strike with the aim
of forcing the resignation of Sein Lwin as president and chairman of
the Burma Socialist Programme Party. Preferring to do political
work in the capital rather than fleeing to the border after the State
Law and Order Restoration Council seized power, Min Ko Naing
was arrested on March 23, 1989, and sentenced to 20 years for sub-
version. Kept at Insein Jail under extremely harsh conditions, in-
cluding torture and solitary confinement, he was later transferred to
the prison in Sittwe (Sittway), Arakan (Rakhine) State. Although
his sentence was reduced to ten years in 1993, he remained in con-
finement, suffering poor health, until released following an amnesty
that was proclaimed after the purge of Lieutenant General Khin
Nyunt in October 2004. See also DEMOCRACY SUMMER.
MINLAUNG • 299
famed “pigeon blood” rubies. Since 1988 and the end of the social-
ist system, there has been significant foreign investment in the min-
ing sector. See also GEMSTONES; OIL AND NATURAL GAS.
302 • MOGOK
MONG TAI ARMY (MTA). In the Shan language, Mong Tai means
“Shan State,” thus “Shan State Army.” Commanded by the drug-
dealing warlord Khun Sa, it was one of the most powerful ethnic
minority armed groups in the early 1990s, with a total armed
strength of as many as 19,000 guerrillas. Although Khun Sa voiced
his commitment to Shan patriotism, the MTA, with its power base
primarily in central and southern Shan State and its headquarters at
Homong near the border with Thailand, played a major role in the
profitable export of opium and heroin to international markets. In
January 1996, Khun Sa surrendered to the State Law and Order
Restoration Council, which was a blow to Shan (Tai) nationalists,
who saw his armed group as a means of defending the interests of
their people. With its collapse, the Tatmadaw was able to gain ef-
fective control in much of central Shan State and carried out exten-
sive forced relocations. The SLORC–MTA agreement was different
from other post-1988 cease-fires because the armed group broke up
rather than continuing an autonomous existence like the Kachin In-
dependence Organization or the United Wa State Army (the in-
creasingly powerful UWSA played an important role in SLORC’s
pre-1996 strategy of softening up the MTA). Composed of MTA vet-
erans, the Shan State Army (South) continues to resist the State
Peace and Development Council in central Shan State.
06-205 (06) L-N.qxd 7/13/06 7:46 AM Page 305
MONS • 305
308 • MOULMEIN
kye waing (brass gongs), the saung gauq (a harp with 13 strings), the
mi-gyaung (“crocodile lute”), the pattala (xylophone), and the hneh
(similar to an oboe). For foreign listeners who find Burmese instru-
mental music discordant, a more appealing genre may be solos on the
“Burmese harp” (saung gauq), often performed by a woman, which are
remarkable for their tranquil and meditative moods.
Western musical modes were introduced during the British colo-
nial period, and a “pop” (popular) music scene has existed in Ran-
goon (Yangon) and other urban areas since at least the Burma So-
cialist Programme Party era (1962–1988), although Ne Win
himself regarded Western-style music as a decadent influence. Under
the State Peace and Development Council, globalization has en-
couraged one of Southeast Asia’s liveliest rock music scenes, which
includes local versions of “rap” and “hip-hop”; given political ten-
sions and the regime’s perennial fear of unrest, the SPDC’s strategy
has been to co-opt, rather than suppress, popular youth-oriented mu-
sic groups like Iron Cross. But, as in other countries, rock music of-
ten serves as a barometer for the younger generation’s frustrations
and disillusionment. See also PERFORMING ARTS, TRADI-
TIONAL.
312 • MYA, BO
–N–
316 • NAGAS
Book Club published both original books and translated ones, num-
bering 71 titles, between 1938 and 1941. They dealt with Burmese
politics; Soviet Russia; the Irish revolution; Chinese politics, in-
cluding the works of Sun Yat-sen; Adolph Hitler; and other issues,
including a translation of Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and
Influence People by Thakin Nu. The club also held public lectures
and published a journal and had a major influence on encouraging
young Burmese to become politically active during and after World
War II.
NAN CHAO. During the Later Han Dynasty, in the second century CE,
the Chinese gained control of what is now Yunnan Province. In the
seventh century, a local state known as Nan Chao was established,
which succeeded in wresting control of the region from the Chinese
by the middle of the following century. Scholars originally believed
the rulers of Nan Chao had a common origin with the Shan (Tai) of
eastern Burma and other Tai groups, but most currently believe, on
linguistic evidence, that they were people speaking a Tibeto-Burman
language, possibly related to the Lolos of modern Yunnan. During the
eighth and ninth centuries, Nan Chao was a militarily powerful state
that exercised influence, if not control, over several areas of Main-
land Southeast Asia, including the upper Irrawaddy (Ayeyarwady)
River Valley. Its expansion had a major impact on the Pyu states of
early Burma.
By the 10th century, however, Nan Chao’s power had waned be-
cause of internal dissension, the rise of an independent Vietnam (Dai
Viet), and other factors. It was no longer a major force in the politics
and warfare of Upper Burma when in the mid-11th century King
Anawrahta founded the Pagan Dynasty, whose nucleus was a set-
tlement on the Irrawaddy River founded by the Burmans (Bamars)
06-205 (06) L-N.qxd 7/13/06 7:46 AM Page 319
two centuries earlier. The role of Nan Chao in early Burmese history
is not clearly understood, but it was probably of major importance,
especially because the control of Yunnan by non-Chinese dynasties
between the 8th and 13th centuries may have prevented Burma from
undergoing Chinese cultural assimilation similar to that experienced
by Vietnam. Burma remained firmly within the Indian sphere of civ-
ilization, as reflected in the central role of Theravada Buddhism in
national identity. When Nan Chao’s successor state was conquered by
Khubilai Khan in the mid-13th century, the way was cleared for
China to assume a more important, and at times threatening, role in
Burmese affairs. See also PAGAN (BAGAN).
Tin U were placed under house arrest; the former was not released
until July 10, 1995. Although the NLD, which campaigned under the
symbol of the kamauk or farmer’s bamboo hat, won almost 60 per-
cent of the popular vote and over 80 percent of the seats contested in
the May 1990 election, the SLORC did not allow it to form a gov-
ernment. Instead, the party has endured systematic repression at the
hands of the authorities, including periodic arrest of most of its top
leaders (including all but four members of the central executive com-
mittee by late 1990), detention or arrest of elected NLD parliamen-
tarians, intimidation and arrest of local party branch leaders and
members (many of whom were pressured to resign), and “mass” ral-
lies, organized by the Union Solidarity and Development Associa-
tion, demanding the party’s dissolution. In the late 1990s, the State
Peace and Development Council (SPDC) repeatedly prevented
Daw Suu Kyi from visiting NLD branches outside Rangoon (Yan-
gon), and Military Intelligence kept careful watch on both Daw Suu
Kyi’s home on University Avenue and NLD headquarters on West
Shwegondine Road in the capital city. Pressure on the party intensi-
fied further after it established the Committee Representing the
People’s Parliament on September 16, 1998, although as of mid-
2005 the SPDC had not taken the final step of revoking the party’s le-
gal status. Hundreds of NLD leaders and members languish in jail,
though others were released during a 2001–2002 “thaw” brokered by
United Nations special envoy Razali Ismail.
Some observers have criticized Daw Suu Kyi and other NLD lead-
ers for failing to develop coherent party policies, especially concern-
ing relations between the Burmans (Bamars) and the ethnic minori-
ties, and for being intolerant of dissent inside the party. However, it
is evident that the SPDC has tried hard to divide the NLD from
within, largely by discrediting Daw Suu Kyi, and has denied the party
the freedom necessary to carry out normal activities.
Following her release from house arrest in May 2002, Daw Suu
Kyi was able to visit party branches in various parts of the country,
including Shan State, Mandalay Division, and Arakan (Rakhine)
State. Most analysts considered the NLD’s organizational structure
moribund after more than a dozen years of persecution, although the
sympathy and support of a “silent majority” of Burmese for the party
remains potentially huge. See also “BLACK FRIDAY” INCIDENT;
06-205 (06) L-N.qxd 7/13/06 7:46 AM Page 324
peace talks with the Indian government, the NSCN-IM more exten-
sively. In the 1990s the NSCN-K established a “government-in-exile”
in the Patkai Mountains in western Sagaing Division, but it was over-
run by the Tatmadaw in 2003, reflecting increased cooperation be-
tween Burma and India in suppressing border area insurgents.
NATS • 327
328 • NAVY
individual figures in the nat pantheon have changed, but the number
has remained the same. Festivals (nat-pwe) are held in their honor,
especially around Pagan (Bagan) and Mandalay. The most impor-
tant center of nat worship is Mount Popa, in Mandalay Division.
Nat shrines are found in villages, at the entrance to pagodas, and
in Burmese households, where offerings are made to an unhusked co-
conut, which is hung in an elevated position and represents Min Ma-
hagiri, one of the 37 nats who was especially esteemed by King
Kyanzittha. Statues of nats, such as the Sule Nat at the Sule Pagoda
in Rangoon (Yangon), associated with the legendary founding of the
Shwe Dagon Pagoda, are a prominent feature of Burmese religious
art (though of less importance than Buddha images).
Belief in nats is fluid, like Western belief in ghosts, and many
Burmese today still believe that the place where a person met a vio-
lent death is haunted by a dangerous nat who must be placated with
offerings. In 1998, it was said that nats caused strange phenomena
(the sounds of disembodied screams, the appearance of blood) near
the Myeinigone Market in Rangoon, the site of a massacre of student
demonstrators by the Riot Police in June 1988. See also
MYEINIGONE MARKET INCIDENT.
NE WIN • 329
330 • NE WIN
the few mass media outlets in Burma. Myanma Alin, named for a
colonial-era vernacular publication, also has dual Burmese–English
editions. Over the years, the newspaper’s content has scarcely varied:
Government slogans are run across the top of the front page, visits of
high-ranking SPDC officials overseas or to various parts of the coun-
try are carefully noted, and there are feature articles on the military
regime’s latest political agenda, for example, in 2004, popular resist-
ance to the U.S. occupation of Iraq, reflecting government hostility
generated by Washington’s sanctions. Its circulation (around 14,000)
is limited, and its stodgy, socialist-era format contrasts starkly with a
newer progovernment publication, the glossy Myanmar Times and
Business Review.
334 • NIBBANA
Caretaker Government between 1958 and 1960, the State Law and
Order Restoration Council (SLORC) carried out a more ambitious
program of expanding the boundaries of Rangoon (Yangon) by es-
tablishing 10 new towns, of which the three largest are Hlaing Tha-
yar, Shwepyithar, and Dagon Myothit (further divided into North,
East, and South Dagon). These new settlements incorporated territo-
ries lying west of the Hlaing River and east of Ngamoeyeik Creek,
the city’s traditional boundaries. As many as 450,000–500,000 peo-
ple moved, or were moved, to these new towns (other estimates are
lower). They included a large number of persons subject to forced re-
location, not only squatters but also people who had supported the
demonstrations of Democracy Summer and had to rebuild their
homes in remote areas lacking basic amenities. Although some peo-
ple relocated voluntarily, for example, civil servants who were
granted parcels of land and wealthy people who bought houses in
luxury developments, the SLORC’s establishment of the new towns
reflects the weakness of individual property rights in Burma, where
the state is recognized as having ultimate authority over land. See
also HUMAN RIGHTS IN BURMA; YANGON CITY DEVELOP-
MENT COMMITTEE.
Burma since the State Law and Order Restoration Council seized
power in 1988. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and
other well-known INGOs began drawing world attention to the new
regime’s human rights abuses, and new NGOs were established by
Burmese exiles and their overseas supporters, including the Free Burma
Coalition, the Burma Project of the Soros Foundation, ALTSEAN-
Burma, the Karen Human Rights Group, and the Shan Human Rights
Foundation. Based in neighboring countries, such as Thailand, Western
countries, or Japan, these groups have been successful in using infor-
mation technology, such as the Internet, to increase awareness of a
country that previously was largely ignored by the international com-
munity. Some of them have also played a role in getting Western gov-
ernments to enact sanctions against the military regime. Such NGOs as
the Burmese Relief Centre and the Burma Border Consortium assist
Burmese refugees in Thailand.
Other NGOs or INGOs have operated inside the country since the
early 1990s, providing assistance in public health, family planning,
and community development. Narcotics and the AIDS epidemic have
been special areas of concern. Such groups include Médecins sans
Frontières-Holland, Médecins du Monde, CARE Myanmar, World
Vision Myanmar, Save the Children Fund (United Kingdom and
United States), Population Services International, and the Adventist
Development and Relief Agency. NGOs are required to sign a formal
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with a government agency,
usually the Ministry of Health, and are expected to work closely with
local Peace and Development Councils, the Union Solidarity and
Development Association, and GONGOS (government-organized
nongovernmental organizations), such as the Myanmar Maternal
and Child Welfare Association, Myanmar Medical Association, and
Myanmar Anti-Narcotic Association. They also must avoid involve-
ment of any kind that the State Peace and Development Council re-
gards as “political,” including contacts with the National League for
Democracy (NLD).
After her release from house arrest in 1995, Aung San Suu Kyi
asked that NGOs working in Burma consult with the NLD, a condi-
tion that, given the restrictions imposed by the regime, is impossible
for them to satisfy; in a 1998 interview, she said that NGOs should
not work inside Burma at all, but rather focus their resources on
06-205 (06) L-N.qxd 7/13/06 7:46 AM Page 336
NU, U • 337
or Thakin Party (thus, he was widely known as “Thakin Nu”) and was
also a founder of the Nagani Book Club. Interned by the British be-
tween 1940 and 1942, he served as foreign minister in the pro-Japanese
wartime government of Dr. Ba Maw from 1943 to 1945. At war’s end,
he was vice president of the Anti-Fascist People’s Freedom League
(AFPFL) and succeeded to the presidency following the assassination
of Aung San on July 19, 1947, negotiating the Nu–Attlee Agreement
with the British government in October of that year.
U Nu was prime minister during the periods 1948–1956,
1957–1958, and 1960–1962. His political vision encompassed non-
Marxist socialism, construction of a modern welfare state, and Bud-
dhism. Though he ceded power to General Ne Win’s Caretaker
Government in October 1958, his Pyidaungsu (Union) Party won
the February 1960 election, and Burma had two more years of civil-
ian government under his prime ministership.
Between 1954 and 1956, U Nu sponsored the Sixth Great Bud-
dhist Council, on the 2,500th anniversary of the Buddha’s attain-
ment of nibbana (nirvana), in which Buddhist monks and lay schol-
ars produced an authoritative version of the Tipitaka (Buddhist
scriptures). Though a strong backer of religious tolerance, U Nu pro-
posed that Buddhism be made the state religion, a measure popular
with the Burman (Bamar) voters that probably assured his 1960
election victory. A constitutional amendment to this effect was passed
in August 1961, but it alienated religious minorities, including Chris-
tians among the Kachins and other border area nationalities. U Nu’s
hosting of the Federal Seminar in February 1962, however, reflected
his willingness to talk with ethnic minority leaders about granting the
border area states more autonomy. U Nu’s government was over-
thrown in the coup d’état of March 2, 1962, and he and other politi-
cal leaders were imprisoned.
U Nu was able to leave Burma in 1969 after his participation in the
Internal Unity Advisory Board (IUAB), and headed an anti-Ne Win
insurgency, the National United Liberation Front, based in Thailand.
This proved ineffectual, and he quit as chairman in 1972, returning to
Burma in 1980 following Ne Win’s announcement of a general
amnesty. Though retired from political life and devoting himself to re-
ligion, he announced a “parallel government” on September 9, 1988,
establishing his own cabinet with himself as prime minister, on the
06-205 (06) L-N.qxd 7/13/06 7:46 AM Page 338
grounds that following the 1962 coup d’état the Constitution of 1947
had never been formally abrogated. Because of his refusal to dissolve
the parallel government, the State Law and Order Restoration
Council kept him under house arrest from December 1989 to April
1992. His party, the League for Democracy and Peace, failed to win a
seat in the General Election of May 27, 1990. He died on February
14, 1995.
U Nu was internationally respected as one of the founders of the
Non-Aligned Movement. At home, he always preferred discussion to
the use of brute force, and his government, though not without its
flaws, was the most democratic Burma ever experienced.
–O–
OIL AND NATURAL GAS. Burma possesses abundant oil and natu-
ral gas resources, located both onshore and offshore. During the
Konbaung Dynasty, “earth oil” was extracted from wells around
Yenangyaung (Yaynangyoung), in present-day Magwe (Magway)
Division. The wells were operated by twinza, “well-eaters,” whose
usufruct right was hereditary. During the British colonial period, the
Burmah Oil Company, a Scottish-owned corporation, extracted oil
from wells at Yenangyaung, Myingyan, and Chauk, and Burma ex-
ported oil products to India. The company continued its operations
until it was nationalized by the Burma Socialist Programme Party
regime in the 1960s. During the socialist period, the energy sector lan-
guished. Although attempts were made to increase oil production and
discover new offshore fields with the cooperation of foreign oil com-
panies, sustained increases in production could not be achieved. Af-
ter the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) seized
power in September 1988, socialist economic policies were dropped
and the way cleared to exploit hydrocarbon resources with the full
participation of foreign oil companies. Beginning in 1989, 18 Euro-
pean, American, and Japanese companies paid large “signature
bonuses” to the SLORC to do onshore exploration from Mon State
in the south to Sagaing Division in the north, but they failed to find
major new deposits. Most had quit the country by 1993, after spend-
ing hundreds of millions of dollars. Burma became increasingly de-
pendent on oil imports, and much locally produced oil was sold on
the black market.
Offshore, deposits of natural gas proved more promising. The
US$1.2 billion Yadana Pipeline Project in the Andaman Sea be-
came the largest foreign investment in Burma; this joint venture
comprising the Myanmar Oil and Natural Gas Enterprise (MOGE),
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 341
Total of France, Unocal of the United States, and the Petroleum Au-
thority of Thailand to export natural gas to Thailand has gained the
Burmese government as much as US$400 million in annual revenues.
A second field, Yetagun, is also being developed. In early 2004, it was
announced that a third natural gas field, called the “Shwe [Golden]
Prospect,” located off the coast of Arakan (Rakhine) State in the
Bay of Bengal, was exploited by a consortium of MOGE, South Ko-
rean, and Indian energy firms. It will provide India with natural gas
and bring the State Peace and Development Council between
US$800 million and US$3 billion in yearly revenue.
Energy exports are ideal sources of hard currency for the SPDC be-
cause the extraction of hydrocarbons takes place in remote areas off-
shore, has—unlike the establishment of new manufacturing industry—
almost no impact on society in central Burma, and is completely under
the control of MOGE and its foreign partners. Cases of forced labor
and forced relocation associated with the Yadana and Yetagun projects
have raised international concern, and many activists fear that con-
struction of a pipeline to India in connection with the Shwe Prospect
will result in similar hardship for people in western Burma. See also
OIL FIELD WORKERS’ STRIKE.
OPIUM. Burma’s most profitable cash crop. Opium and its derivatives,
especially heroin, generate hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue
annually. Raw opium latex is extracted from the pods of the opium
poppy (Papaver somniferum), which is cultivated in remote, hilly
parts of Shan and Kachin States. Because of soil and climatic condi-
tions, the most productive areas are the Wa District and Kokang, both
located along the border with China east of the Salween (Thanlwin)
River, though areas close to the border with Thailand also account
for significant production. For generations, local farmers have found
that growing opium is more profitable than other crops, although their
income is small compared to the profits made by middlemen and the
leaders of drug-financed armed groups, such as the former “kings of
the Golden Triangle,” Lo Hsing-han and Khun Sa. After the Peo-
ple’s Republic of China forcefully ended opium production and con-
sumption inside its borders, the Golden Triangle—consisting of east-
ern Burma, northern Thailand, and Laos—supplied international
demand for illicit opiates. The demand for heroin increased during the
Vietnam War, when it was used widely by U.S. troops stationed in
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 343
OPIUM • 343
neither the government nor the ethnic armed groups have seriously
addressed the problem of the massive outflow of Burma-produced
amphetamines into Thailand. See also DRUG ECONOMY.
PA-AN • 345
–P–
PAGAN • 347
was often difficult to tell the difference between a bandit (dacoit) and
a patriotic leader. In some areas, members of the Sangha actively
aided the resistance, anticipating the anti-British “political pongyis”
of the 1920s. British use of Karen (Kayin) levies to suppress the re-
bellion, encouraged by some Christian missionaries, fueled ethnic
antagonism.
Although the uprisings were largely suppressed by 1890, the
British resorted to similar pacification measures in dealing with the
Saya San (Hsaya San) Rebellion of 1930–1932, the last major
Burmese rural uprising. See also ANGLO-CHIN WAR.
PAGODA • 349
350 • PAHTO
built to resemble caves. The most important pahto are found at the
old royal capital of Pagan (Bagan). See also ARCHITECTURE, RE-
LIGIOUS.
352 • PANTHAYS
the second conference, held February 7–12, 1947, at the town of the
same name in what is now Shan State. At the conference, Aung San
and leaders of the Kachin, Chin, and Shan communities agreed to a
basic framework for the Union of Burma, incorporating both Burma
Proper and the Frontier Areas. It was held against the background of
the January 1947 Aung San–Attlee Agreement, which recognized
the inclusion of the two regions in the new independent state. The con-
ference resulted in the agreement to establish Kachin State, recogni-
tion of the autonomy of the sawbwas within Shan State, and the in-
clusion of the Chins in Burma. Further commitments were made to
ensure fair and equal treatment of the Frontier Area peoples through
representation in the highest levels of government and economic de-
velopment. The Frontier Areas Committee of Enquiry was charged
with further investigating minority sentiment—especially among the
smaller groups.
Aung San’s accommodating attitude at Panglong won the trust of
minority leaders, but the Karennis (Kayahs), who regarded their
states as essentially independent, did not commit themselves to join-
ing the Union, and the Karens (Kayins), who demanded a separate
state under British protection, refused to participate. The decisions
made at the conference were embodied in the Constitution of 1947,
which combined the features of both a federal and a unitary state. The
anniversary of the conclusion of the conference, February 12, is cel-
ebrated as Union Day. See also ADMINISTRATION OF BURMA,
BRITISH COLONIAL PERIOD; NATIONAL UNITY.
National Union, the Chin Democracy Party, and the New Mon State
Army), known as the National United Front. However, the move-
ment fell apart after U Nu quit as PDP president in 1973 and left for
India.
356 • PEACOCK
many surrendered their arms during a 1958 amnesty. Old PVO lead-
ers played a peripheral role in the prodemocracy uprising of 1988.
362 • POPULATION
to the nats. Often called “Burma’s Mount Olympus,” the nat cult
flourished there long before King Anawrahta established the official
pantheon of the Thirty-seven Nats. A popular destination for pil-
grims, it hosts two important nat-pwe, in spring and winter, and is
widely known as the “temple mount” (daung kalat). It should not be
confused with the actual Mount Popa, which is located nearby and has
an altitude of over 1,500 meters (4,500 feet).
364 • PROME
PYINMANA • 365
the early centuries CE and are often described as the “advance guard”
of the Burmans (Bamars). Most of what we know about them comes
from the Buddhist pilgrims I Tsing and Hsuan-tsang, the official his-
tory of the T’ang Dynasty (618–906), and other Chinese sources, as
well as extensive excavations that have been carried out since British
colonial times at Sri Ksetra (Thayekkhittaya), one of the Pyus’ ma-
jor cities. Deeply influenced by India and possibly ruled for a time by
an Indian dynasty, the Pyus practiced a religion that combined Hindu
and Buddhist elements. According to the Chinese, they exercised
suzerainty over 18 states and nine walled cities. Apart from Sri Kse-
tra, they had sizeable urban centers at Beiktano (in present-day
Magwe [Magway] Division) and Halingyi (in Sagaing Division).
The Pyus paid tribute to Nan Chao and may have been conquered by
that state in the ninth century CE.
According to Chinese descriptions, they had a high level of cul-
ture. At the beginning of the ninth century, a band of Pyu musicians
accompanying a Nan Chao mission to the T’ang capital of Ch’ang-an
gave a performance before the emperor. A didactic verse by the great
Chinese poet Po Chü-I recommended that the emperor pay more at-
tention to the sufferings of the peasants than to the exotic music of
P’iao (Pyu): “Music of P’iao, in vain you raise your din/Better were
it that my Lord should listen to that peasant’s humble words.” No
trace remains of the Pyus as a people today; they were probably as-
similated by the Burmans.
–R–
RAIL TRANSPORT. The first railroad was opened for service in 1877
under British rule, connecting Rangoon (Yangon) with Prome
(Pyay). By 1941, Burma had an extensive rail system, totalling 4,600
kilometers (2,852 miles) of track, including the spectacular Gokteik
Viaduct in what is now Shan State, constructed by American engi-
neers between 1899 and 1903. Most rail links were inoperable by the
end of World War II, and the system further suffered from the in-
surgencies and instability of the late 1940s and early 1950s. Accord-
ing to government statistics, Burma’s track mileage totalled 5,837
kilometers (3,619 miles) in 1997–1998. There has been construction
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 368
368 • RAM-UK
of new rail links since the State Law and Order Restoration Coun-
cil seized power in 1988. Like the wartime Thai–Burma Railway,
these projects have often involved the use of forced labor.
RANCE, HUBERT. British army general who served as the head of the
Civil Affairs Service (Burma) from July to October 1945 and was ap-
pointed Reginald Dorman-Smith’s successor as governor of Burma
in August 1946. He established a friendly working relationship with
Aung San, which facilitated a peaceful resolution of the indepen-
dence issue, as reflected in the January 1947 Aung San–Attlee
Agreement.
RANGOON • 369
370 • RANGOON
REFUGEES • 375
376 • REFUGEES
This group, mostly students but also including teachers, civil servants,
and members of the Sangha, was largely urban and Burman (Bamar).
Based along the lengthy Thai–Burma border, many joined the All
Burma Students’ Democratic Front (ABSDF) and fought together
with other members of the Democratic Alliance of Burma (DAB)
against the SLORC. By the mid-1990s, however, a majority of these
activists had left the border area and settled in Bangkok, Chiang Mai,
and other parts of Thailand, or went farther afield to Japan, North
America, or Western Europe. Smaller groups of student refugees set-
tled in China and India. Since 1988, a steady stream of Burman and
ethnic minority intellectuals, artists, and members of the Pyithu Hlut-
taw who won seats in the General Election of May 27, 1990, have
also gone abroad, fleeing persecution.
By far the largest number of refugees are members of ethnic mi-
norities who have, either directly or indirectly, been targets of the
“Four Cuts” strategy of the Tatmadaw, aimed at removing popular
support for such insurgent movements as the Karen National Union.
These include Shans, Karennis, Karens (Kayins), and Mons, most of
whom have fled across the border into Thailand. They can be divided
into two groups: a relatively stable population of Karens, Mons, and
Karennis, numbering 120,000–130,000, who live in refugee camps
along the Thai–Burma border; and a much larger group of people from
Shan State, as many as one million, who work as illegal or semilegal
laborers inside Thailand. India has an estimated 52,000 refugees,
mostly Chin, Bangladesh about 120,000 Muslim Rohingyas, and
China an undetermined number of Kachins. Although most Burmese
refugees live in neighboring countries, there is a large number of Ro-
hingyas in Malaysia and the Middle East. The total number of
Burmese refugees is unknown, but is probably between one and two
million.
The conventional distinction between political refugees, who are
fleeing persecution at home, and economic refugees, who are seeking
a better livelihood abroad, is not especially useful in Burma’s case
because many in the latter category, especially ethnic minorities, are
fleeing truly desperate conditions caused by the policies of the State
Peace and Development Council. They include minority women
and girls who have been drawn into the sex industry in northern
Thailand because of extreme economic deprivation (an estimated
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 377
Muslim, 1.2 percent animist, 0.5 percent Hindu, and 0.2 percent
other. Burma’s national identity has been intimately connected with
Theravada Buddhism since the 11th century, when King Anawrahta
of the Pagan Dynasty made it the official religion (thus the popular
saying, “to be Burmese is to be Buddhist”). During the dynastic pe-
riod, Burman (Bamar), Mon, Arakanese (Rakhine), and Shan
rulers gave generous donations to the Buddhist Sangha and spon-
sored pagoda-building projects. The old kings were also charged
with upholding doctrinal orthodoxy by appointing a respected senior
monk as head of the Sangha (known as the Thathanabaing in the
Burmese [Myanmar] language). From at least the Pagan period,
there were minority communities of Hindus and Muslims, and in
later centuries Christians, whose presence was generally tolerated.
The British colonial regime was religiously neutral, refusing to ap-
point a Thathanabaing, but allowed Christian missionaries to prose-
lytize, especially among ethnic minority peoples, such as the Karens
(Kayins), Chins, and Kachins. Thus, defense of the Buddhist reli-
gion became a major theme in early 20th-century nationalism. The
British also encouraged the immigration of people from the Indian
subcontinent, most of whom were Hindus or Muslims, greatly in-
creasing the size of these religious minorities, especially in Lower
Burma. This contributed to violent communal clashes during the
1930s between Burmese Buddhists and Hindu or Muslim Indians.
Burma’s status as a secular state continued after it became indepen-
dent in 1948, but in August 1961, with the backing of Prime Minis-
ter U Nu, parliament passed a constitutional amendment making
Buddhism the official religion. The Revolutionary Council estab-
lished in March 1962 by General Ne Win nullified this measure, and
since then Burma officially has remained secular (this is reflected in
the Constitution of 1974, which was abrogated in 1988). However,
the post-1988 State Law and Order Restoration Council/State
Peace and Development Council military junta has patronized sen-
ior monks and devoted scarce resources to ambitious pagoda proj-
ects, including replacement of the hti or finial on the Shwe Dagon
Pagoda in 1999. By acting as Buddhism’s patrons, imitating the old
Burmese kings, the military regime seeks to acquire legitimacy in the
eyes of the religious majority. Minorities, especially Muslims, have
had their religious activities restricted by the state and, at times, have
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 379
380 • RICE
RICE. Burma’s staple food, the most important part of the meal for
most people. Burmese people are among the world’s largest rice con-
sumers: A per capita average of 186 kilograms of cleaned rice is eaten
annually, which provides around 75 percent of their caloric intake.
Rice is also a major element in the development of the country’s his-
tory and cultures. Paddy rice cultivation became synonymous with
civilization in lowland or plateau areas inhabited by Mons, Burmans
(Bamars), Arakanese (Rakhines), and Shans (Tai) because it made
possible a high standard of living (compared to hill-dwelling peoples,
who engaged in shifting agriculture) in which Indo-Buddhist civi-
lization, including the building of pagodas and royal support for the
Sangha, flourished. Irrigated rice fields, principally at Kyaukse and
Minbu, were the economic foundation of the Pagan Dynasty, pro-
viding it with surpluses of food that supported a powerful and mili-
tarily expansive state from the 11th to 13th centuries. After Lower
Burma was annexed following the Second Anglo-Burmese War in
1852, the British encouraged the migration of farmers from Upper
Burma, who cleared land in the delta of the Irrawaddy
(Ayeyarwady) River and grew rice for export. This experiment in
“industrial agriculture,” assisted by British investment in transporta-
tion and rice mills and the opening of the Suez Canal, was so suc-
cessful that, before World War II, Burma was the world’s largest sup-
plier of the grain to world markets (over three million tons annually).
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 381
RICE • 381
384 • SAGAING
–S–
386 • SALE
SAMSARA. The cycle of rebirth and suffering that all living things
must endure until they attain nibbana (nirvana). In Buddhist cos-
mology, there are 31 levels of existence, ranging from the deepest
hell to heavenly realms inhabited by incorporeal beings. Simply put,
the sum total, or nature, of an individual’s meritorious or evil deeds
(kamma) over a lifetime determines the place of rebirth. Because
Buddhists do not believe in the existence of an immortal soul (the
doctrine of anatta), the manner in which a being passes from one life
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 387
SANCTIONS • 387
Freedom and Democracy Act,” a set of more severe measures that in-
clude a ban on imports from Burma and financial transactions be-
tween Americans and entities connected in any way to the State Peace
and Development Council (SPDC). A number of American states
and cities passed “selective purchasing laws” in the 1990s designed to
penalize companies that did business in Burma, but the Massachusetts
law was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court. Although by 2003
some new Japanese ODA projects had been initiated, the Tokyo gov-
ernment did not approve aid on the scale given during the Ne Win era
before 1988 because of financial considerations and pressure from the
United States. Because of American, Japanese, and European influ-
ence over multilateral institutions, such as the World Bank and the
Asian Development Bank, Burma was effectively barred from receiv-
ing their support, at least on a major scale.
Supporters of tough sanctions and “constructive engagement”
(capital investment in the country to promote social change and
eventual democratization) are bitterly at odds. In a 1997 essay in the
Hong Kong–based magazine Far Eastern Economic Review, Ma
Thanegi, a former associate of Daw Suu Kyi, claimed that sanctions
hurt the people without effectively changing the behavior of the
regime. Some observers argued that although business-oriented in-
vestment or aid should be (partially) banned, Burma desperately
needed humanitarian aid. Critics of sanctions noted that the 2003
trade embargo by Washington threw tens of thousands of women
factory workers out of work because Burma exported US$300–400
million in textiles to the United States, and that sanctions by West-
ern countries have had little real impact because the SPDC has close
economic ties with China, India, and members of the Association
of Southeast Asian Nations. In fact, it seems that neither sanctions
nor constructive engagement have had much influence on the be-
havior of the SPDC, which is willing to risk economic overdepen-
dence on China and to sacrifice the welfare of the people to keep it-
self in power. See also ECONOMY AND ECONOMIC POLICY,
STATE LAW AND ORDER RESTORATION COUNCIL/STATE
PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ERA; “VISIT MYAN-
MAR YEAR”.
SANGHA • 389
390 • SAW, U
monks, they shave their heads and live according to strict monastic
rules. Ordination of women was once practiced in Theravada coun-
tries but has died out.
Historically, the relationship between the Sangha and the Burmese
state has been complex, complementary, and sometimes antagonistic.
In precolonial times, Burmese kings assumed responsibility for re-
forming or purifying the monastic orders and appointing a senior
monk, the Thathanabaing, to oversee them. During the colonial pe-
riod, the British policy of religious neutrality is said to have con-
tributed to the monkhood’s poor discipline and low quality at the
time. Many monks, most notably U Ottama and U Wisara, became
politically active. In May 1980, Ne Win convened the Congregation
of the Sangha of All Orders to reassert state control over the monks.
Although young monks participated in the demonstrations of De-
mocracy Summer, the post-1988 military government has been
largely successful in gaining the compliance of conservative senior
members of the Sangha. See also ALL BURMA YOUNG MONKS
UNION; OVERTURNING THE OFFERING BOWL; SHINBYU.
SAWBWA • 391
way, it would be possible for him to become the first prime minister
of independent Burma. But U Saw was promptly arrested, put on
trial, and sentenced to death in December 1947, the sentence being
carried out in May of the following year. See also AUNG SAN, AS-
SASSINATION OF; SAYA SAN (HSAYA SAN) REBELLION; TAT.
394 • SAYADAW
Burma and the Shan States (1901) and Burma: A Handbook of Prac-
tical Information (1906, 1921). Although a century old, these classics
are still consulted and quoted by Burma watchers and travelers today,
including his comments on the remote and little-known Was.
SHAN STATE. In land area, the largest of Burma’s states and divi-
sions, covering 155,801 square kilometers or (155 square miles). It
contains 11 districts (Taunggyi, Loilem, Lashio, Muse, Kyaukme,
Kunlong, Laukkai, Keng Tung, Monghsat, Monghpyak, and
Tachilek), which are subdivided into 54 townships. Shan State is bi-
sected by the Salween (Thanlwin) River. West of the Salween, the
Shan Plateau, an upland region with an average elevation of 900
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 398
meters, comprises most of its land area. There are rugged mountain
ranges east of the river and in the northern and western parts of the
state. Shan State borders Mandalay and Sagaing Divisions to the
west, Kachin State to the north, and Karen (Kayin) and Kayah
(Karenni) States to the south. The state forms part or all of Burma’s
international borders with China to the northeast, Laos to the east
(the two are separated by the Mekong River), and Thailand to the
southeast. The largest lake is Inle Lake, located near the state capi-
tal, Taunggyi.
The 1983 census, the last one taken, recorded 3,716,841 inhabi-
tants; exact figures on the present population are not available, but it
was estimated at 4.8 million in 2000. The flow of refugees into
neighboring Thailand since the mid-1990s has probably had a signif-
icant demographic impact. Aside from Taunggyi, which in 1983 had
108,231 inhabitants (134,023 estimated in 1996), major cities and
towns include Keng Tung, Hsipaw, Lashio, and Kalaw.
Shan State is one of Burma’s most ethnically diverse regions.
The Shans (Tai), who comprise around half of the population, are
valley dwellers who cultivate rice and have adopted Indo-Buddhist
civilization. Their states, traditionally governed by sawbwas and
other local dynastic rulers and ideologically and institutionally
similar to those of the Burmans and Mons, trace their roots to at
least to the 13th century, and probably earlier. Other important eth-
nic groups (there are around 35 in all) include the Pa-O, Palaung,
Kachin, Wa, Lahu, Akha, and Kokang Chinese. In contrast to the
valley-dwelling Shans, these groups commonly live in upland ar-
eas and traditionally practice shifting agriculture (taungya),
growing dry rice, buckwheat, and maize. Shan State cash crops in-
clude tea, coffee, oranges, pineapples, and sugarcane. Its forests,
once covering three-quarters of the land area, have been heavily
depleted. Many of the upland peoples, especially the Wa and
Kokang Chinese in northeastern Shan State, grow opium poppies.
Although quantities of exports and acreage under poppy cultiva-
tion have declined in recent years, Shan State is still one of the
world’s major sources of opium, heroin, and amphetamines.
After the British pacified the region in the late 1880s, they gov-
erned what is now Shan State indirectly, allowing the rulers of 43
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 399
its constituent ethnic units signed cease-fires with the State Law and
Order Restoration Council. The cease-fires, especially one agreed
to by Khun Sa, commander of the Mong Tai Army, in January 1996,
fundamentally changed the balance of power in Shan State. The post-
1988 military regime was able to exert unprecedented power in cen-
tral and southern parts of the state, ordering massive forced reloca-
tions and causing the movement of hundreds of thousands of
refugees to Thailand; moreover, the drug-dealing United Wa State
Army, formally an ally of the State Peace and Development Coun-
cil (SPDC), became the most powerful ethnic armed group, with ter-
ritory along the Thai–Burma border as well as the border with China.
Many areas of Shan State are now sites of SPDC-sponsored Border
Area Development programs, including an opium poppy crop sub-
stitution project in Kokang. Following the loss of their traditional
rulers and protectors, the Shans have become targets for regime-
instigated human rights abuses, as well as attempts by the central
government to “Burmanize” their traditional culture and religion. See
also CHINESE IN BURMA; FEDERAL MOVEMENT; FRONTIER
AREAS; INTHA; MINERAL RESOURCES; PANTHAYS; SHAN
NATIONALITIES LEAGUE FOR DEMOCRACY (SNLD); SHAN
STATE ARMY (SOUTH); TAUNGGYI.
SHAN STATES. The term refers to both to a unique kind of polity estab-
lished by Shans (Tai) in various parts of Burma since at least the 13th
century and a group of such polities, known as the Federated Shan
States after 1922, which enjoyed a measure of autonomy under their
own rulers—commonly known as sawbwa (sao pha), myoza, and
ngwekhunhmu—during the British colonial period.
Known as möng in the Shan language, the traditional Shan polity
was established in valleys and lowland areas where wetland rice could
be cultivated. Ideologically and institutionally, it resembled the states of
lowland Burma, especially its promotion of close ties between the state
and Sangha. Principally in what is now Shan State but also in parts of
Kachin State and other areas, Shans lived clustered in or around a for-
tified city and exercised influence over adjacent hill peoples, such as the
Palaung, Wa, and Akha, a hierarchical distribution of power and au-
thority that, on a higher level, included the möng’s ceremonial and
sometimes actual subordination to a larger state, such as the Konbaung
Dynasty or the British colonial regime. Located near Burman (Bamar)
power centers, the western states of Hsipaw, Hsenwi, and Tawngpeng
were open to Burmese influences, while Keng Tung, east of the Sal-
ween (Thanlwin) River, was subject to more influence from Thailand
and even China. Within Shan society was a marked distinction between
the noble and commoner classes, as well as a separate group of “out-
castes,” slaves and persons in “unclean” professions, such as butchery.
Shan chronicles record the establishment of an important state at Mo-
gaung in present-day Kachin State in 1215. Keng Tung was established
in the late 13th century.
Following the Third Anglo-Burmese War, the British succeeded
in “pacifying” the Shan States by 1888; the Shan States Act, passed
the following year, established a system of British residents responsi-
ble to the Superintendents of the Northern and Southern Shan States.
The rulers were given “writs of authority” (sanads) that confirmed
their claims to the throne and were promised minimal interference in
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 402
their internal affairs as long as they enforced law and order. Accord-
ing to the Imperial Gazeteer of India, published in 1905, the Northern
Shan States consisted of 5 entities as well as the remote and unsettled
Wa states, and the Southern Shan States consisted of 38 entities, for
a total in the two areas of 43 states. After World War II, Kokang was
also recognized by the British as a full-fledged Shan State. Only
around 14 to 16 states (including Kokang after 1945) were ruled by
full-fledged sawbwa, the others being ruled by the lower-ranking
chiefs known as myosa and ngwekhunhmus. In the early 20th century,
the colonial authorities also recognized the existence of four Shan
States lying within the districts of Burma Proper: Mong Mit,
Hsawnghsup, Singaling Hkamti, and Hkamti-long.
Some Shan states were extensive: Keng Tung encompassed over
31,000 square kilometers (12,000 square miles) and had more than
190,000 residents in the early 20th century. But others were tiny prin-
cipalities, such as Namtok, which comprised only 32 square kilome-
ters (20 square miles) and had a population of 778 (1905 figures). But
they were structurally similar and shared these similarities with Shan
polities outside of Burma, such as those in northern Thailand, Laos,
and China’s Yunnan Province.
The establishment of the Federated Shan States and the Federal
Council of Shan Chiefs in 1922 marked a trend toward centralization
and rationalization. Each ruler was obliged to remit part of his tax
revenues into a common Federal Fund, which paid for public works,
the police, and social services. Shan rulers, including the first presi-
dent of the Union of Burma, Sao Shwe Taik, signed the agreement
that resulted from the 1947 Panglong Conference, which recognized
their traditional status and the autonomy of their polities. During the
1950s, the imposition of martial law by the central government fol-
lowing the incursions of the Kuomintang and Tatmadaw abuses of
local populations eroded the rulers’ authority. In March 1959, the
Shan State Council, composed of the rulers, agreed to relinquish their
“feudal” privileges. In April, each of them signed an agreement with
the Caretaker Government of General Ne Win terminating his sta-
tus, in exchange for compensation. The long and colorful history of
the Shan States was at an end, but the consequence was not modern-
ization and development but rather an anarchic situation in which the
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 403
SHANS • 403
Shans and other ethnic minorities have endured war and oppression.
See also CONSTITUTION OF 1947; FEDERAL MOVEMENT;
HAW; KARENNI STATES.
has been adopted by other ethnic groups, such as the Karenni; and
their material culture includes distinct characteristics, such as the
wearing of trousers rather than a longyi. From the 14th to the 16th
centuries, the Shans were the most powerful group in Upper Burma,
although after the rise of the Toungoo Dynasty they were driven out,
and many Shan principalities fell under Burmese suzerainty.
Since Burma became independent in 1948, the Shans have endured
unbroken war and insurgency; the State Law and Order Restora-
tion Council/State Peace and Development Council has used a “di-
vide and rule” strategy (cease-fires) in Shan State since 1988 that has
weakened their armed groups and exposed them to major human
rights violations and compulsory cultural “Burmanization.” Many
Shans have left Burma to become “invisible” refugees in Thailand,
hoping to find employment and refuge from persecution.
SHINBYU. The major life-cycle ritual for nearly all male believers in
Burmese Buddhism, the initiation of boys into the Sangha, al-
though their sojourn as koyin or novice monks in a monastery is
usually brief. The ceremony begins with a festive procession, the
initiates being dressed in princely garb, like Gotama Buddha be-
fore his renunciation of the world. The ritual usually entails con-
siderable expense, and sponsors gain much kutho (merit), because
shinbyu is seen as a means of propagating the religion. Parents play
an important role in the initiation, but when the boy’s head is
shaved and he dons the robes of a monk, they must do him obei-
sance. Through shinbyu the boy becomes a “dignified person.” A
life-cycle ritual for small girls, ear boring, often occurs at the same
time as the initiation. Although it is a common practice for boys in
Theravada Buddhist countries to spend some time in a monastery, it
is especially important in Burma.
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 405
SHWE TAIK, SAO (1894–1962). Prominent Shan (Tai) leader and the
Union of Burma’s first president. Educated at the Shan Chiefs’ School
in Taunggyi, he served in the British army for 20 years and in 1927
was chosen as successor to his uncle as sawbwa of Yawnghwe by the
state’s council of ministers. After World War II, he initially opposed
the policy of Prime Minister Clement Attlee’s government to merge
Burma Proper with the Frontier Areas in an independent Burma, but
compromises reached with Anti-Fascist People’s Freedom League
President Aung San at the Panglong Conference of February 1947
persuaded him to sign the agreement that concluded the historic con-
ference. He served as president of the Union of Burma from 1948 to
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 411
1952. From 1952 to 1960, he was speaker of the upper house of par-
liament, the Chamber of Nationalities. An advocate of reform and
modernization in the Shan States, he endorsed the formal relinquish-
ment of authority by the sawbwas to the Shan State government in
1959, but also played an important role in the Federal Movement.
When General Ne Win seized power and shut down parliamentary
government in March 1962, Sao Shwe Taik’s house in Rangoon (Yan-
gon) was surrounded by troops, and his youngest was son killed. He
died at Insein Jail under ambiguous circumstances in November 1962.
See also HEARN KHAM, SAO NANG.
100 meters high, and, like the Shwe Dagon, Shwemawdaw, and
Kyaiktiyo pagodas, is a major site of Buddhist pilgrimage in Lower
Burma. See also ARCHITECTURE, RELIGIOUS.
SITTWE • 413
414 • SITWUNDAN
Workers and Peasants Party in 1950. When the AFPFL split in 1958,
the mainstream Socialists inside the League constituted the “Stable”
faction, a rival to Prime Minister U Nu’s “Clean” faction.
SOE WIN. Lieutenant general, commander of the Air Force, and First
Secretary (Secretary-1) of the State Peace and Development Coun-
cil (SPDC). Following the purge of Khin Nyunt in October 2004, he
was also appointed Burma’s prime minister. A graduate of the 12th
class of the Defence Services Academy, he rose to the position
of SPDC Secretary-2 in February 2003 as successor to Lieutenant-
General Tin Oo, who died in a helicopter crash in Karen (Kayin)
State on February 19, 2001. On August 25, 2003, he replaced Khin
Nyunt as Secretary-1. He is close to Senior General Than Shwe and
is a hard-liner, refusing to compromise with the democratic opposi-
tion. He reportedly ordered troops to fire on protesters during the
Rangoon General Hospital Incident in August 1988 and was also
partly responsible for the “Black Friday” Incident in May 2003.
See also STATE PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, IN-
TERNAL DYNAMICS.
muay thai, though rougher and with more informal rules; the loser in
a match is the one who wipes blood from his face a certain number of
times. Le-thwei matches frequently occur at pwe, and national cham-
pionships are held at Aung San Stadium in Rangoon (Yangon). For
poor but tough young men, the sport promises a kind of upward mo-
bility, or at least winnings from matches to supplement meagre earn-
ings. A form of wrestling similar to Japanese sumo is found in Arakan
(Rakhine) State, and traditional regattas involving long boats with
many rowers are often held on Rangoon’s Kandawgyi Lake.
nor a putsch carried out by a single military faction against rivals (be-
cause the top levels of the Tatmadaw remained united behind the new
junta). Its legal, or extralegal, status appears to have been inspired by
the concept of “an aid to civil power,” found in the British colonial-era
code of laws, in which the military may be empowered to intervene “in
a state of extreme emergency” to protect lives and property. According
to some sources, Dr. Maung Maung, serving as president at the time,
advised SLORC chairman General Saw Maung about the use of this
legal justification on the eve of the takeover.
The mission of the SLORC was defined in four objectives: restora-
tion of law and order; facilitation of transportation and communica-
tions through adequate security; provision of the people with food
and other basic necessities; and successful staging of democratic,
multiparty elections after the three prior objectives have been met.
Although SLORC leaders repeatedly emphasized the transitional na-
ture of military rule and the need to establish a democratically elected
civilian government, reformulation of the junta’s objectives in the
more vague Three Main National Causes (“Non-Disintegration of
the Union,” “Non-Disintegration of National Solidarity,” and “Con-
solidation of Sovereignty”) in the early 1990s indicated that the tran-
sition process would be a lengthy one. Regime spokesmen defined
the SLORC’s role as historically analogous to that of the 1962 Rev-
olutionary Council, which over a dozen years prepared the way for
establishment of a new constitutional order, the Socialist Republic of
the Union of Burma.
On the state/division, township, and ward/village tract levels, Law
and Order Restoration Councils composed of lower-ranking military
officers were established to control the civil administration, in a pattern
similar to the post-1962 Security and Administration Committees.
At the time of its formation, the SLORC junta consisted of 19
members: Chairman General Saw Maung (later Senior General),
who served concurrently as commander in chief of the Tatmadaw,
prime minister, defense minister, and foreign minister; vice chairman
lieutenant general Than Shwe, concurrently commander of the
army; Secretary-1 Brigadier (later Lieutenant General) Khin Nyunt,
who was also head of Military Intelligence; Secretary-2 Colonel Tin
Oo; the commanders of the navy and air force; the adjutant-general;
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 421
Operations-3 (Pegu,
Rangoon, Irrawaddy
Divisions, Arakan State)
12. Lieutenant-General SPDC Member; Chief of
MAUNG BO Bureau of Special
Operations-4 (Karen, Mon
States, Tenasserim Division)
warnings on the need for London to promote the economic and social
development of the Frontier Areas and to recognize their aspirations
was highly prescient. See also AUNG SAN–ATTLEE AGREE-
MENT; FRONTIER AREAS COMMITTEE OF ENQUIRY; PANG-
LONG CONFERENCE.
Aung San and Nu, were expelled from the university by the British
authorities. Students also protested in December 1938 after some stu-
dents were arrested for assisting the Oil Field Workers’ Strike.
Most students respected Prime Minister U Nu, a highly educated
man. Despite the influence of the Communist Party of Burma on
campuses, his government generally treated student demonstrators
leniently. Under Ne Win, the government’s attitude changed com-
pletely, as reflected in the July 7, 1962 Incident, in which a large
number of students were shot dead by the Tatmadaw. Despite high
casualties inflicted by the authorities and the imprisonment of thou-
sands of students, their opposition persisted stubbornly throughout
the 1962–1988 period, when Ne Win was in power, including the
People’s Peace Committee demonstrations (1963), the Southeast
Asian Games demonstrations (1969), the U Thant Incident (1974),
protests demanding the release of imprisoned students (1975), the
movement commemorating the birth centenary of Thakin Kodaw
Hmaing (1976), and student protest over the demonetization order
of September 1987. The year 1988 saw the most massive expression
of student militancy in the history of independent Burma, beginning
with the demonstrations of March at the Rangoon (Yangon) Insti-
tute of Technology and Rangoon University and culminating in De-
mocracy Summer.
After the State Law and Order Restoration Council seized power
in September 1988, many student oppositionists went to the border ar-
eas to fight the new military regime, their most important organization
being the All Burma Students’ Democratic Front. Some activists,
such as Min Ko Naing, chose to work inside the country. By keeping
the campuses closed during much of the period between 1988 and
2001, offering an increasing number of courses through distance edu-
cation, intensifying Military Intelligence surveillance of students, and
moving universities outside Rangoon’s city center to remote locations,
the authorities largely succeeded in curtailing student activism, al-
though demonstrations broke out briefly in December 1996. See also
ALL BURMA FEDERATION OF STUDENTS UNIONS; ALL
BURMA STUDENTS UNION; AUNG GYAW, BO; DAGON UNI-
VERSITY; DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR A NEW SOCIETY; EDU-
CATION, HIGHER; MAUNG PHONE MAW; PEACE TALKS; TEA
SHOP INCIDENT; WHITE BRIDGE INCIDENT.
06-205 (07) O-S.qxd 7/13/06 7:48 AM Page 427
TAT • 429
–T–
430 • TATMADAW
“Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere,” and the BDA was re-
placed by the Burma National Army (BNA). Aung San, considered
by Burmese people to be the founder of the Tatmadaw, served as war
minister in the cabinet of Dr. Ba Maw, while Ne Win became the
BNA’s commander in chief.
After Aung San ordered the BNA to rise up against the Japanese on
March 27, 1945 (Resistance Day, known today as Armed Forces
Day), the British recognized it as the Patriotic Burmese Forces
(PBF). Following the Kandy Conference of September 1945, the
British established a new Burma Army, composed of BNA/PBF vet-
erans and the old colonial armed forces, which were composed of
ethnic minority troops who had remained loyal to them during the
war. This was a highly unstable arrangement. The largely Burman
(Bamar) PBF men regarded themselves as genuinely “patriotic sol-
diers” (myochit sittha in the Burmese [Myanmar] language) and the
ethnic minority rank and file as “rightists” and “mercenary soldiers”
(kyesar sittha) because they had fought on the side of the British.
However, the latter outnumbered the former (11 of 15 infantry bat-
talions were minority troops), and the commander in chief of the
postwar Burma Army was a Karen (Kayin), General Smith Dun.
During the communist and ethnic minority uprisings of
1948–1949, most ethnic minority officers and men mutinied or were
purged, leaving only a rump of the Burma Army loyal to the central
government: the ex-PBF forces, commanded by Ne Win. With the
support of local levies known as sitwundan, Ne Win succeeded in
rolling back the “multi-colored insurgents.” During the 1950s, the
Tatmadaw, now primarily a Burman armed force (especially on the
officer level), underwent substantial internal reorganization and ra-
tionalization, designed to make it a more efficient fighting force and
insulate it from both civilian oversight and political factionalism.
When the army-run Caretaker Government assumed power from
1958 to 1960, the Tatmadaw, described almost as a “state within the
state,” played an increasingly dominant economic and social, as well
as political, role in national life.
The two martial law regimes established in March 1962 and Sep-
tember 1988, the Revolutionary Council and the State Law and
Order Restoration Council, asserted a monopoly of military con-
trol over almost all aspects of society in central Burma. But al-
06-205 (08) T-Z.qxd 7/13/06 7:50 AM Page 435
436 • TAUNGGYI
TEAK • 437
TEA SHOPS. Tea shops are an essential part of social life in Burma,
places for refreshment, conversation, and just passing the time. Busi-
ness is often conducted in these shops, and in a society where the
state-run mass media have little credibility, they are good places to
swap rumors or political opinions. For this reason, Military Intelli-
gence informers are frequent customers.
The tea is usually served with milk and sugar, though thin Chinese
tea is also provided free of charge. Tea shops also sell a wide variety
of tea snacks, usually Chinese- or Indian-style, along with other
items, such as cigarettes. Some tea shops are quite elaborate, but oth-
ers, especially in the villages, are little more than open-air stalls
equipped with small wooden tables and chairs. See also TEA SHOP
INCIDENT.
The rail line was repeatedly attacked by Allied aircraft and fell into
disuse after the war. A popular novel about the railway, Pierre
Boulle’s Bridge on the River Kwai, contains a number of inaccura-
cies. During the 1990s, a new rail line constructed between Tavoy
(Dawei) and Ye by the State Law and Order Restoration Council,
which also used forced laborers, is often compared to the original
“Railway of Death.” See also FORCED LABOR; YE–TAVOY
RAILWAY.
Karen National Union (KNU) and the New Mon State Party
(NMSP), as “buffers” against the Burmese. These insurgent groups
carried out trade across the border, especially at Three Pagodas Pass,
exporting Burmese raw materials, including teak, in exchange for
consumer goods from Thailand that supplied Burma’s black market.
Ethnic minority armies in Shan State, such as the Mong Tai Army
exported opium and heroin to international markets through Thai-
land, but although the trade earned corrupt Thai officials large payoffs,
it had relatively little impact on Thailand’s own society.
Guided by Washington’s Cold War strategies, Thailand’s behavior
earned the distrust of the Burmese in other ways, especially when it
became apparent that Bangkok and Washington backed the Kuom-
intang (Guomindang) incursions into Shan State in the early 1950s.
Relations reached an all-time low when Thailand offered sanctuary to
former Prime Minister U Nu’s Parliamentary Democracy Party
(PDP) in 1969; in 1970, the PDP became part of a united front, the
National United Liberation Front, which sought unsuccessfully to
overthrow the Ne Win regime.
In the late 1980s, Thailand’s prime minister, Chatichai Choonha-
van, talked about “replacing battlefields with marketplaces” in
post–Cold War Mainland Southeast Asia. Burma–Thailand relations
underwent a fundamental transformation in 1988, following the es-
tablishment of the State Law and Order Restoration Council
(SLORC) and the end of Burmese-style socialism. In December of
that year, the Thai Army commander, Chaovalit Yongchaiyuth, led a
delegation to Rangoon (Yangon) to talk with SLORC chairman
General Saw Maung. The new Burmese military regime was des-
perate for cash, and the Chaovalit–Saw Maung summit led to the
SLORC’s awarding concessions to Thai companies to exploit forest
resources along the border; these earned the regime over US$110
million annually between 1989 and 1993. The SLORC also granted
Thai companies offshore fishing contracts. The Yadana Pipeline
Project, the largest single foreign investment project in Burma, was
built in the 1990s to supply Thailand with natural gas extracted from
the Gulf of Martaban (Mottama).
Closer cooperation between the Thai military and the Tatmadaw
after 1988 put an end to the ethnic minority insurgents’ buffer status.
06-205 (08) T-Z.qxd 7/13/06 7:50 AM Page 444
They lost the freedom to operate on Thai soil, while Tatmadaw units
were sometimes allowed to attack KNU units from the Thai side of
the border. In 1990, Burmese troops occupied Three Pagodas Pass,
formerly controlled by the KNU and the NMSP; in 1995, they cap-
tured the major KNU base at Manerplaw.
Although economic engagement and closer relations brought mon-
etary rewards to Thai elites, the country has suffered from the conse-
quences of Burmese social and political instability. Hundreds of
thousands of Karen (Kayin), Mon, Karenni, and Shan (Tai)
refugees, as well as Burman (Bamar) student exiles, fled to Thai-
land in the wake of the SLORC power seizure and Tatmadaw “Four
Cuts” campaigns. Most of these refugees lacked documentation, and
many became illegal workers inside Thailand. Powerful new drug-
dealing armies in Shan State, especially the United Wa State Army
(UWSA), flooded the country with cheap amphetamines, creating a
major drug epidemic nationwide that especially targeted young peo-
ple. Growth of Chinese influence has also worried Thai leaders, and
the flow of cheap Chinese consumer goods into Burma has disap-
pointed businesspeople who had hoped the country would become
part of a Thailand-centered economic zone.
Along the long, poorly demarcated Thai–Burma border, an unpre-
dictable mix of the Thai Army and Border Police, Tatmadaw troops,
cease-fire armed groups (such as the UWSA), and non-cease-fire
groups (such as the KNU and the Shan State Army-South) has led
to periodic outbursts of armed conflict. One of the worst incidents oc-
curred in February 2001, when Thai and Tatmadaw artillery units ex-
changed fire across the border at Mae Sai-Tachilek, an event that
stimulated a paroxysm of anti-Thai propaganda in Burma’s state-run
mass media, including glorification of the 16th-century conqueror-
king Bayinnaung, who subjugated Siam in the 1560s.
On the Thai side, old images of the Burmese as the “enemy nation”
have revived in popular films such as Ban Rajaan (about a band of vil-
lagers who, Alamo-like, fought to the death against an 18th-century
Burmese onslaught) and Suryothai (about a legendary queen who died
fighting the Burmese invader from the back of an elephant).
But Thai attitudes toward Burma since 1988 have been complex.
As Thailand moved from military domination of politics to govern-
ment by elected civilian politicians, many “civil society” activists ex-
06-205 (08) T-Z.qxd 7/13/06 7:50 AM Page 445
THANAKHA • 447
Shan and Karen (Kayin) States that assured him rapid promotion.
Appointed commander of the Southwest Military Region in 1983, he
attained the rank of lieutenant general four years later. He was ap-
pointed vice chairman of the State Law and Order Restoration
Council (SLORC) when it was established on September 18, 1988,
and also served as commander in chief of the Army. He succeeded
Senior General Saw Maung as SLORC chairman on April 23, 1992,
and remained in the same post when the SLORC was reorganized as
the State Peace and Development Council in November 1997.
Regarded by outsiders in the 1990s as an aging, neutral figure, who
delayed retirement in order to stem rivalries between Khin Nyunt and
Maung Aye, Than Shwe has often been underestimated. Observers
now see him as the successor to Ne Win as the country’s unitary
“strong man,” though he lacks the deceased leader’s prestige and his-
torical role in the independence movement. Than Shwe is a highly
conservative figure, apparently willing to sacrifice Burma’s post-
1988 open-door policies to preserve the military-dominated status
quo. Lacking personal charisma, he is a reclusive leader, preferring to
exercise his power ambiguously and from behind the scenes. See also
STATE PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, INTERNAL
DYNAMICS.
448 • THANT, U
THINGYAN • 449
gramme Party. He is also well known for his short stories, novels,
and political memoirs.
454 • TIPITAKA
TOWNSHIP • 457
–U–
Stevenson lobbied for the United Frontier Union in London, the pro-
posal was rejected by the Labour government of Clement Attlee, which
promised Aung San that Britain would adhere to the principle that
Burma Proper and the Frontier Areas would form a single independent
state. See also AUNG SAN–ATTLEE AGREEMENT; PANGLONG
CONFERENCE.
After the cease-fire with the SLORC was signed, the cultivation
and export of opium and heroin in areas under UWSA control in-
creased tremendously. Bao Youxiang has promised that his territo-
ries will be “opium free” by 2005, but nothing has been done about
the trade in cheap amphetamines (known in the Thai language as
yaabaa, “crazy medicine”), 80 percent of which is controlled by the
UWSA.
The UWSA has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for the
State Peace and Development Council. It has played an effective
role in the junta’s “divide and rule” strategies in Shan State: UWSA
pressure contributed to Khun Sa’s decision to sign a cease-fire in Jan-
uary 1996, causing the breakup of his Mong Tai Army, which had
been strong enough to frustrate the military regime’s objective of con-
trolling central and southern Shan State. But the UWSA is powerful
enough to deny the Tatmadaw access to its own territories, in contrast
to the situation in Kokang, where the Myanmar National Demo-
cratic Alliance Army, another cease-fire group, is much weaker and
internally divided. The UWSA’s aggressive behavior has led to occa-
sional border clashes with the Thai Army, though border problems
have not prevented political and business leaders in Bangkok from
pursuing profitable relations with the SPDC.
Flush with cash from drug dealing, the UWSA has expanded into
a variety of businesses. It controls the Myanmar May Flower Group,
a Rangoon (Yangon)-based enterprise that includes one of Burma’s
largest private banks, and has a stake in Yangon Airways, a private
airline that caters to Burma’s tourist trade. Reports by the few out-
sider observers to enter Wa territory indicate that while UWSA lead-
ers like Bao are fabulously wealthy, ordinary Wa people endure some
of the worst poverty in Burma.
UPPER BURMA. A term used by the British in the 19th and early 20th
centuries to refer to those territories ruled by the Konbaung Dynasty
until the Third Anglo-Burmese War (1885). Upper Burma was
sometimes referred to as “Ava,” the name of a royal capital. It in-
cludes present-day Mandalay, Magwe (Magway), and Sagaing Di-
visions, and its chief urban center is Mandalay, Burma’s last royal
capital. It is bisected by the Irrawaddy (Ayeyarwady) River, tradi-
tionally the main artery of transportation. Like Lower Burma, Upper
06-205 (08) T-Z.qxd 7/13/06 7:50 AM Page 467
–V–
hours a day, seven days a week, the “VIP Grids,” which include
Bogyoke Ywa (“generals’ villages”).
–W–
WAS • 469
States felt the impact of war and heavy Chinese influence. Until re-
cently, the core of the Wa States, an area of about 2,600 square kilo-
meters (1,000 square miles), was inhabited by the “Wild Wa,” a fierce
group of headhunters who lived in well-fortified hilltop villages and
were ruled by ramang (chiefs), the heads of a confederation of three
or four villages. Beyond this, there appears to have been no stable po-
litical organization, making the term “states” rather misleading.
Headhunting seems to have stopped only in the 1970s. In 1989, the
United Wa State Army established its headquarters at Panghsang
and divided the original Wa States into 11 districts. The area remains
one of Burma’s poorest and most undeveloped, dependent on the cul-
tivation of opium poppies.
470 • WAS
474 • WISARA, U
scene. However, the freedoms that Burmese women enjoy are not
equivalent to 100-percent equality with men in terms of social roles.
In the religious sphere, women are not only prohibited from joining
the Sangha, but it is also believed that only men can achieve nibbana;
women cannot enter certain holy places, such as the upper platform of
the Shwe Dagon Pagoda or the space directly in front of the Maha
Muni Buddha Image in Mandalay. The shinbyu ceremony for
young boys entering the monkhood far overshadows girls’ coming-of-
age rite, the ear-boring (natwin) ceremony.
Men are commonly believed to possess a certain authority or
power (hpoun) that would be diminished if they find themselves
placed in any situation where their inferior position to women is ap-
parent, for example, sitting below a woman on a crowded bus or ferry
boat or allowing their heads to pass beneath a woman’s garments on
a clothesline. Burmese women are expected to show deference to
men, especially their husbands, even if this is only for show. A major
reason for the strong antipathy that Senior General Than Shwe and
other members of the State Peace and Development Council
(SPDC) feel toward Aung San Suu Kyi is her insistence upon ex-
pressing her opinions frankly and interacting with them as equals.
Her behavior is seen as very “Western” and antipathetic to traditional
values, though she is also greatly admired for her courage. It is prob-
ably significant that during its long history, Burma has had only one
major female ruler, the Mon Queen Shinsawbu.
Military values and military control of the political system since
1962 have resulted in a decline in Burmese women’s social status,
compared to the parliamentary and even British colonial eras. Burma
is one of the few countries (another being Saudi Arabia) where
women at present hold no important government posts. Ethnic mi-
nority women have suffered worst of all from human rights abuses,
including the apparently systematic rape of Karen (Kayin) and Shan
women by Tatmadaw officers and men.
Even in central Burma, economic stagnation and the deterioration
of health and educational services since 1988 have had an especially
harsh impact on women’s lives. The recent growth in the sex indus-
try, which previously had not been a major social problem, reflects
the fact that for both ethnic minority and Burman women with fam-
ilies to support, few other types of employment are widely available.
06-205 (08) T-Z.qxd 7/13/06 7:50 AM Page 477
WORLD WAR II, ETHNIC MINORITIES IN. World War II and the
Japanese Occupation transformed relations between the indigenous
and nonindigenous ethnic minorities and the Burman (Bamar) eth-
nic majority. In Lower Burma, the Japanese invasion and anti-
Indian incidents led to the departure of more than half a million per-
sons of South Asian descent in early 1942. They returned to the
British-ruled subcontinent, often overland under conditions of great
hardship. Only a few went back to Burma after the war, meaning that
South Asians (including people from what are now India, Pakistan,
and Bangladesh) exercised significantly reduced economic and social
influence compared to before 1941. The Overseas Chinese and Sino-
Burmese sometimes suffered harsh treatment at the hands of the
Japanese, but apparently not the systematic atrocities endured by the
Chinese in Singapore and Malaya. The Anglo-Burmese (Eurasians)
seem not to have been systematically persecuted, but they lost the fa-
vorable connections provided by British rule. Violent race riots broke
out between Buddhist and Muslim residents of Arakan after British
authority there collapsed in early 1942.
Generally loyal to the British, the Karens (Kayins) of the Ir-
rawaddy (Ayeyarwady) River Delta region and the hills east of
the Sittang (Sittoung) River endured atrocities at the hands of the
Burma Independence Army and the Japanese, and organized
guerrilla resistance with the help of Force 136. The British supplied
the hill Karens with weapons, which they used with great effect
against retreating Japanese troops in 1945. Although Dr. Ba Maw
and General Aung San tried to win their trust, Karen wartime
experiences engendered strong opposition to their inclusion in any
Burman-dominated state, leading to the 1949 uprising by the Karen
National Union.
With a few exceptions, the Kachins, Chins, and Nagas, who
lived along Burma’s mountainous borders with India and China,
06-205 (08) T-Z.qxd 7/13/06 7:50 AM Page 478
–Y–
kilometers, the pipeline extends from the Yadana natural gas field in
the Andaman Sea, just south of Rangoon (Yangon) over water and
land, a land corridor in northern Tenasserim (Tanintharyi) Division
reaching to Thailand, where the gas is used to generate electricity.
The project is controversial for two reasons: It generates as much as
US$400 million in revenues annually for the State Peace and De-
velopment Council, and construction of the pipeline and associated
facilities involved extensive forced labor and forced relocation in
Tenasserim Division, especially of Karen (Kayin) and Mon vil-
lagers. Security was provided by the Tatmadaw, which applied the
“Four Cuts” policy to local insurgents and their civilian supporters.
A similar project was initiated at the Yetagun natural gas field, in-
volving Japanese, British, and Malaysian partners. Both projects
were targets of campaigning by international nongovernmental or-
ganizations, and Unocal was brought to court in the United States
for complicity in human rights abuses.
YENANGYAUNG • 483
British colonial times. Clusters of oil wells can be seen just outside
the town. See also OIL FIELD WORKERS’ STRIKE.
ZARGANA • 485
–Z–
Bibliography
CONTENTS
Introduction 488
I. General 493
1. Bibliographies and Research Guides 493
2. Directories, Handbooks, Statistical Abstracts, and Yearbooks 494
3. Guides 494
4. Travel and Description 494
II. History 496
1. General 496
2. Prehistory 497
3. Dynastic History (1st Millennium to 19th Century CE) 497
4. Colonial and Pacific War Era (19th–20th Centuries CE) 500
5. Post-Independence Era (1948–1987) 506
6. The Political Crisis of 1988 508
III. Contemporary Burma (Myanmar) 509
1. Population, Ethnicity, and Languages 509
2. Economics and Economic Engagement 511
3. Politics 514
4. Foreign Relations and Security-Military Affairs 519
5. Human Rights 520
6. Social and Public Health Issues 522
7. Religion, Religion in Society 523
IV. Cultural Expression 525
1. Literature 525
2. Architecture, Plastic, and Visual Arts 526
3. Performing Arts 529
487
06-205 (09) Biblio.qxd 7/13/06 7:52 AM Page 488
488 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
INTRODUCTION
Following the tumultuous events of 1988, Burma’s political, social, and hu-
manitarian crises gained international attention. Before that year, the country
was largely isolated from the rest of the world and was of interest to only a
small number of scholars and specialists. But as this bibliography shows, a
growing quantity of recent publications deal with human rights and ethnic mi-
nority issues, the dynamics of military rule, the democratic opposition, and the
country’s postsocialist “open” economy (including the controversy over
whether foreign countries should implement sanctions against the State Peace
and Development Council or engage with it economically).
In addition, the diffusion of online information services since the mid-
1990s has given both the democratic opposition and the military regime a
new medium through which to present their views. Probably the single great-
est change in Burma-related information over the past decade has been the
crucial role of the Internet in reporting developments inside the country to a
worldwide audience. For example, the unrest in Rangoon connected with la-
bor strikes and the U Thant incident in 1974, arguably a precursor for the
more massive demonstrations of 1988, was little known outside the country.
It merited brief discussion in an essay by Raja Segaram Arumgam in the 1975
edition of Southeast Asian Affairs, and it was only in 1989 that Andrew Selth
published a detailed English-language account (“Death of a Hero: The U
Thant Disturbances in Burma, December 1974”). However, the Alternative
ASEAN Network on Burma (Altsean), a Bangkok-based NGO, provided via
e-mail attachment a detailed and thoroughly cited report on the May 30, 2003,
attack on Aung San Suu Kyi and her supporters in northern Burma (“Brief-
ing: Black Friday and the Crackdown on the NLD”) only 12 days after the
event. Doubtless the full story of “Black Friday” will not be known for many
years, but the speed, volume, and ubiquity of online information delivery
means that Burma is no longer a “closed” country despite the efforts of the
SPDC to control domestic information technology and present an alluring
face to the outside world.
One of the oldest online information sources is the BurmaNet News (www
.burmanet.org), which was established in 1994 and provides an electronic “clip-
ping file” of newspaper and periodical articles; it is posted to subscribers about
five times weekly. But the most comprehensive source is the Online
Burma/Myanmar Library (www.burmalibrary.org), which encompasses a vast
and growing amount of information on contemporary developments and some
older sources, such as the Burma Press Summary, a digest of articles from the
Working People’s Daily compiled during the late 1980s and early 1990s.
Through the Online Burma Library, one can also access scores of other Burma-
06-205 (09) Biblio.qxd 7/13/06 7:52 AM Page 489
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 489
490 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 491
492 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Armies: The Fall of British Asia, 1941–1945, published in 2004, which re-
counts wartime events in Burma, India, and the Malay Peninsula.
One of the best histories of the “Thirty Comrades” is Izumiya Tatsuro’s The Mi-
nami Organ, translated into English by U Tun Aung Chain and published in Ran-
goon in 1985. For those interested in Japanese soldiers’ experiences in the Burma
war, see Kazuo Tamayama and John Nunneley, Tales by Japanese Soldiers. Eric
Lomax’s The Railroad Man is a story of wartime memories and reconciliation
from a former POW who worked on the infamous Thai–Burma Railway.
The standard sources on Burmese Buddhism remain Melford E. Spiro’s Bud-
dhism and Society: A Great Tradition and Its Burmese Vicissitudes, E. Michael
Mendelsohn’s Sangha and State in Burma: A Study of Monastic Sectarianism
and Leadership, and Winston L. King’s A Thousand Lives Away: Buddhism in
Contemporary Burma. But more recent studies on Buddhism include those by
Guy Lubeigt, Hiroko Kawanami, Bruce Matthews, and Juliane Schober. Arti-
cles on nat-worship have been published by Bénédicte Brac de la Perrière and
Sarah Bekker. The history of Christian missionary activity in Burma is also
well documented, for example, Janet Benge and Geoff Benge in Adoniram Jud-
son: Bound for Burma.
Relatively little in dynastic era or modern Burmese literature that has yet to
be translated into English or other Western languages. Maureen Aung-Thwin’s
translation of Ma Ma Lay’s Not out of Hate was published in 1991, but to this
writer’s knowledge there exist no—or at least no readily available—English
translations of Burma’s premier nationalist writer, Thakin Kodaw Hmaing
(see Aung San Suu Kyi’s discussion of him in “Literature and Nationalism in
Burma”). Lack of attention to the country’s contemporary literature may re-
flect the poor conditions under which writers and publishers must operate, the
lack of translators outside Burma who could make the best writing available
to a global audience, and perhaps also the intense focus on the part of
Burmese intellectuals on immediate, political issues. Anna J. Allott’s Inked
Over, Ripped Out: Burmese Storytellers and the Censors provides a sample
of recent short stories and a discussion of the heavy state control that writers
must endure.
The country’s sophisticated artistic and architectural heritage is reflected in
such attractively illustrated studies as Sylvia Fraser-Lu’s Burmese Crafts Past
and Present, Alexandra Green and T. Richard Blurton’s Burma: Art and Arche-
ology, Ralph Isaac and T. Richard Blurton’s Visions from the Golden Land:
Burma and the Art of Lacquer, and Pierre Pichard’s monumental, multivolume
Inventory of Monuments at Pagan. Noel Singer’s Old Rangoon: City of the
Shwedagon recalls the city’s precolonial and colonial past, with excellent pho-
tographs. Myanmar Design: Art, Architecture and Design of Burma by John
06-205 (09) Biblio.qxd 7/13/06 7:52 AM Page 493
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 493
I. GENERAL
494 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
3. Guides
Burma Action Group. Burma: The Alternative Guide. 2nd ed. London: BAG,
1995.
Eliot, Joshua, and Jane Bickersteth. Myanmar (Burma) Handbook. Bath, En-
gland: Footprint Handbooks, 1997.
Globetrotter Travel Map: Myanmar. London: Old Saybrook, 1999. Scale
1:1,700,000.
Martin, Steven, et al. Myanmar (Burma). 8th ed. Footscray, Victoria: Lonely
Planet, 2002.
Saw Myat Yin. Culture Shock! Burma. Singapore: Times Books International,
1994.
———. Cultures of the World: Burma. Singapore: Times Books International,
1990.
Tun Shwe Khine. A Guide to Mahamuni. Rakhine Book Series. Rangoon: U
Hla Sein, 1996
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 495
496 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
II. HISTORY
1. General
Cady, John F. The United States and Burma. The American Foreign Policy Li-
brary. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976.
Hall, D. G. E. Burma. London: Hutchinson University Library, 1960.
Renard, Ronald D. “For the Fair Name of Myanmar: They Are Being Blotted
out of Burma’s History.” In Burma: Myanmar in the Twenty-First Century—
Dynamics of Continuity and Change. Edited by John J. Brandon. Bangkok:
Thai Studies Section, Chulalongkorn University, 1997.
06-205 (09) Biblio.qxd 7/13/06 7:52 AM Page 497
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 497
2. Prehistory
Ba Maw. “The First Discovery in the Evolution of Anyathian Cultures from a
Single Site in Myanmar.” Myanmar Historical Research Journal 2 (June
1998): 97–105.
———. “Research on the Early Man in Myanmar.” Myanmar Historical Re-
search Journal 1 (1995): 213–20.
Hla Myo Nwe. “Sophisticated Stone Age Imagery at Padahlin.” Myanmar Per-
spectives 5 (December 1996): 55–57.
Houtman, Gustaaf. Human Origins, Myanmafication and “Disciplined”
Burmese Democracy. London: Pekhon University Press, 2000.
Nyunt Han, Win Maung, and Elizabeth Moore. “Prehistoric Grave Goods from
the Chindwin and Samon River Regions.” In Burma: Art and Archeology.
Edited by Alexandra Green and T. Richard Blurton. Chicago: Art Media Re-
sources, 2002.
Than Tun. “Prehistoric Researches in Myanmar.” In Traditions in Current Per-
spective: Proceedings of the Conference on Myanmar and Southeast Asian
Studies 15–17 November 1995, Yangon. Rangoon: The Universities Press, 1996.
498 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 499
500 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 501
502 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 503
504 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 505
506 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Tate, D. J. M. The Making of South-East Asia. Vol. 2, The Western Impact: Eco-
nomic and Social Change. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Oxford University
Press, 1979.
Taylor, Robert H. “Disaster or Release? J. S. Furnivall and the Bankruptcy of
Burma.” Modern Asian Studies 29, no. 1 (February 1995): 45–64.
———. Marxism and Resistance in Burma: Thein Pe Myint’s Wartime Traveler.
Athens: Ohio University Press, 1984.
Tinzar Lwyn. “The Mission: Colonial Discourse on Gender and the Politics of
Burma.” New Literatures Review 24 (Winter 1992): 5–22.
Turrell, Robert Vicat. “Conquest and Concession: The Case of the Burma Ruby
Mines.” Modern Asian Studies 22 (February 1988): 141–63.
The U.S. Army and World War II: Selected Papers from the Army’s Commemo-
rative Conferences. Washington, D.C.: Center of Military History, United
States Army, 1998.
Webb, G. H. “Kipling’s Burma; a Literary and Historical Review.” Asian Af-
fairs 15 (June 1984): 163–78.
Wilkinson, Wynyard R. T. Indian Silver, 1858–1947: Silver from the Indian
Sub-continent and Burma Made by Local Craftsmen in Western Forms. Lon-
don: W. R. T. Wilkinson, 1999.
Willis, G. R. T. No Hero, Just a Survivor: A Personal Story with Beaufighters
and Mosquitoes of 47 Squadron RAF over the Mediterranean and Burma
1943–1945. Huddersfield, England: Robert Willis, 1999.
Woodward, Mark R. “When One Wheel Stops: Theravada Buddhism and the
British Raj in Upper Burma.” Crossroads 4, no. 1 (Fall 1988): 57–90.
Yang Li. The House of Yang: Guardians of an Unknown Frontier. Sydney, Aus-
tralia: Bookpress, 1997.
Yoon, Won Z. Japan’s Scheme for the Liberation of Burma: The Role of the Mi-
nami Kikan and the “Thirty Comrades.” Athens: Ohio University Center for
International Studies, 1973.
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 507
Callahan, Mary P. Making Enemies: War and State Building in Burma. Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2003.
Chao-Tzang Yawnghwe. The Shan of Burma: Memoirs of a Shan Exile. Singa-
pore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1987.
Davies, Philip H. J. “Legacies of Secret Service: Renegade SOE and the Karen
Struggle in Burma, 1948–50.” In The Clandestine Cold War in Asia,
1945–65: Western Intelligence, Propaganda and Special Operations. Port-
land, Ore.: Frank Cass, 2000.
Elliott, Patricia. The White Umbrella. Bangkok: Post Books, 1999.
Maung Maung, Dr. Burma and General Ne Win. Rangoon: Religious Affairs
Department Press, 1969.
Maung Maung Gyi. “Foreign Policy of Burma since 1962: Negative Neutral-
ism for Group Survival.” In Military Rule in Burma since 1962: A Kaleido-
scope of Views. Edited by F. K. Lehman. Singapore: Maruzen Asia, 1981.
Mya Maung. “The Burma Road to Poverty: A Socio-Political Analysis.” The
Fletcher Forum 13, no. 2 (Summer 1989): 271–94.
———. “Cultural Value and Economic Change in Burma.” Asian Survey 4, no.
3 (March 1964): 757–64.
Nu, U. Saturday’s Son. Translated by Edward Law-Yone. New Haven, Conn.:
Yale University Press, 1975.
Ono Toru. “The Development of Education in Burma.” East Asian Cultural
Studies 20, nos. 1–4 (March 1981): 107–34.
Raja Segaram Arumgam. “Burma: A Political and Economic Background.” In
Southeast Asian Affairs, 1975. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies/
Heinemann Asia, 1975.
———. “Burma: Political Unrest and Economic Stagnation.” In Southeast Asian
Affairs, 1976. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies/Heinemann
Asia, 1976.
Remond Htoo, Saw. “The Massacre of the University Students in Rangoon
1962, July 7.” Unpublished paper presented at the Opening Ceremonies of
the Center for Burma Studies, Northern Illinois University, July 28, 1987.
Sargent, Inge. Twilight Over Burma. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1994.
Selth, Andrew. Death of a Hero: The U Thant Disturbances in Burma, Decem-
ber 1974. Research Paper 49. Brisbane, Australia: Griffith University Centre
for the Study of Australian-Asian Relations, 1989.
Silverstein, Josef. Burma: Military Rule and the Politics of Stagnation. Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1977.
———. Burmese Politics: The Dilemma of National Unity. New Brunswick,
N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1980.
———. “The Other Side of Burma’s Struggle for Independence.” Pacific Affairs
58, no. 1 (spring 1985): 98–108.
06-205 (09) Biblio.qxd 7/13/06 7:52 AM Page 508
508 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 509
Maung Maung, Dr. The 1988 Uprising in Burma. Monograph 49. New Haven,
Conn.: Yale Southeast Asia Studies, 2000.
Moksha Yitri. “The Crisis in Burma: Back from the Heart of Darkness?” Asian
Survey 29, no. 6 (June 1989): 543–58.
Tanabe Hisao. Biruma Minshuka Undo–, 1988: Dokyu– mento [Document:
Burma’s Democracy Movement, 1988]. Tokyo: Nashi no Ki Sha, 1989.
510 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 511
512 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Cook, Paul and Martin Minogue. “Economic Reform and Political Change in
Myanmar.” World Development 21 (July 1993): 1151–61.
Country Profile. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit (annual publica-
tion).
Country Report. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit (quarterly publica-
tion).
Economy of Burma. Parts 1 and 2. New Delhi: Washington, D.C.: Library of
Congress Office; Library of Congress Photoduplication Service, 1998–1999.
Fujisaka, Sam, Keith Moody, and Keith Ingram. “A Descriptive Study of Farm-
ing Practices for Dry Seeded Rainfed Lowland Rice in India, Indonesia, and
Myanmar.” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 45 (May 1993): 115–28.
Hirouchi, Kaori. “Japan’s Official Foreign Aid to Burma: Contradiction and
Motivation.” Master’s Thesis, Clark University, 1998.
Hobson, J. S. Perry, and Roberta Leung. “Hotel Development in Myanmar: Pol-
itics and the Human-Resources Challenge.” The Cornell Hotel and Restau-
rant Administration Quarterly 38 (February 1997): 60–71.
Innes-Brown, Marc, and Mark J. Valencia. “Thailand’s Resource Diplomacy in
Indochina and Myanmar.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 14, no. 4 (March
1993): 332–51.
Kanayama, Hisahiro. Expectations and Reality: The Economic & Political
Transition of Vietnam & Myanmar. Tokyo: Institute for International Policy
Studies, 1995.
Kane, Robert E., and Robert C. Kammerling. “Status of Ruby and Sapphire Min-
ing in the Mogok Stone Tract.” Gems & Gemology 27 (Fall 1992): 152–74.
Khin Maung Nyunt. Foreign Loans and Aid in the Economic Development of
Burma 1974/75 to 1985/86. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing
House, 1990.
Kiryu Minoru, ed. ASEAN and Japanese Perspectives on Industrial Develop-
ment and Reforms in Myanmar: A Survey of Selected Firms. Bangkok: Chu-
lalongkorn University Printing House, 1998.
———. Industrial Development and Reforms in Myanmar: ASEAN and Japan-
ese Perspectives. Bangkok: White Lotus, 1999.
———. “Performance and Prospects of the Myanmar Economy.” In Southeast
Asian Affairs 1992. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1992.
McCarthy, Stephen. “Ten Years of Chaos in Burma: Foreign Investment and
Economic Liberalization Under the SLORC-SPDC, 1988 to 1998.” Pacific
Affairs 73, no. 2 (Summer 2000): 233–62.
Mya Maung. “The Burma Road from the Union of Burma to Myanmar.” Asian
Survey 30, no. 6 (June 1990): 602–24.
———. The Burma Road to Capitalism: Economic Growth Versus Democracy.
Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1998.
06-205 (09) Biblio.qxd 7/13/06 7:52 AM Page 513
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 513
514 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
3. Politics
Burma Students Democratic Front. Orchestra Burma, 2000. Available at www
.orchestraburma.org/politics/absdf/Absdf%20Index.htm.
Allott, Anna J. “The Media in Burma and the Pro-Democracy Movement of
July–September 1988.” South-East Asia Library Group Newsletter 34–35
(December 1990): 17–24.
Aung Hla. “Using the Internet in the Cyberwar Between Burma Activists and
the Military Government of Burma 1998.” Master’s Thesis, University of
Maryland, College Park, 1998.
Aung San Suu Kyi. Freedom from Fear and Other Writings. Rev. ed. Edited by
Michael Aris. London: Penguin Books, 1995.
———. “In Her Own Words: Interview with Daw Aung San Suu Kyi.” Burma
Debate IV, no. 5 (November/December 1997): 21–27.
———. Letters from Burma. New York: Penguin, 1997.
———. “An Opening Keynote Address: The NGO Forum on Women Beijing
1995, 31 August 1995.” Burma Debate 11, no. 4 (August/September 1995):
16–19.
———. The Voice of Hope. New York: Seven Stories Press, 1998.
Bečka, Jan. “The Military and the Struggle for Democracy in Burma: The Pre-
sentation of the Political Upheaval of 1988 in the Official Burmese Press.”
Archiv Orientalni 61 (1993): 63–80.
06-205 (09) Biblio.qxd 7/13/06 7:52 AM Page 515
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 515
516 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 517
518 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 519
520 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
5. Human Rights
Allott, Anna J. Inked Over, Ripped Out: Burmese Storytellers and the Censors.
New York: Pen American Center, 1993.
Amnesty International. Myanmar—Exodus from the Shan State. London: Inter-
national Secretariat, 2000.
Apple, Betsy. School for Rape. Bangkok: EarthRights International, 1998.
Bamforth, Vicky, Steven Lanuouwand Graham Mortimer. Conflict and Dis-
placement in Karenni: The Need for Considered Approaches. Chiang Mai,
Thailand: Burma Ethnic Research Group, 2000.
Bangladesh/Burma: Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh, The Search for a Last-
ing Solution. New York: Human Rights Watch/Asia, 1997.
Burma: Children’s Rights and the Rule of Law. New York: Human Rights
Watch, 1998.
Burma, Entrenchment or Reform: Human Rights Developments and the Need
for Continued Pressure. New York: Human Rights Watch/Asia, 1995.
Burma: Extrajudicial Execution, Torture and Political Imprisonment of Members
of the Shan and Other Ethnic Minorities. London: Amnesty International, 1988.
Burma: Human Lives for Natural Resources, Oil & Natural Gas. Chiang Mai,
Thailand: The Southeast Asian Information Network and the All Burma Stu-
dents’ Democratic Front, Chiang Mai University, 1994.
Burma: Human Rights, Foreign Trade, Aid and Investments. Brussels, Belgium:
International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), Department of
Free Trade Union Rights, 1994.
06-205 (09) Biblio.qxd 7/13/06 7:52 AM Page 521
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 521
522 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 523
Renard, Ronald D. The Burmese Connection: Illegal Drugs and the Making of
the Golden Triangle. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner, 1996.
Report of the Preliminary Joint Survey Team on Opium Production and Con-
sumption in the Union of Burma.” Thai-Yunnan Project Newsletter 22 (Sep-
tember 1993): 20–23.
The Role of NGOs in Burma. Milton Keynes, England: World Vision, 1995.
A Situation Analysis of Children and Women in Myanmar. Rangoon: United
Nations Children’s Fund, 1990.
Swan, June Angela “Utilization of Mental Health Services Among Myanmar
Americans.” Ph.D. Dissertation, California School of Professional Psychol-
ogy, Los Angeles, 1993.
Tin May Than and Ba Aye. “Energy Intake and Energy Output of Burmese
Farmers at Different Seasons.” Human Nutrition 39c (January 1985): 7–15.
Women’s Report Card on Burma. Bangkok: Alternative A[SEAN] Network on
Burma, 2000.
524 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 525
1. Literature
Allott, Anna J. “Burma.” In The Traveller’s Literary Companion to Southeast
Asia. Edited by Alastair Dingwall. Brighton, England: In Print Publishing,
1994.
06-205 (09) Biblio.qxd 7/13/06 7:52 AM Page 526
526 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 527
528 • BIBLIOGRAPHY
Howard, Michael C. Textiles of the Hill Tribes of Burma. Bangkok: White Lo-
tus, 1999.
Isaacs, Ralph, and Richard T. Blurton. Visions from the Golden Land: Burma
and the Art of Lacquer. London: British Museum, 2000.
Karow, Otto. Burmese Buddhist Sculpture: The Johan Moger Collection.
Bangkok: White Lotus, 1991.
Le Bonheur, Albert. “Bronze Burmese Buddha Acquired by the Musée Guimet,
Paris.” Arts Asiatiques 45 (1990): 126–27.
Lefferts, H. Leedom Jr. “Contemporary Burmese Earthenware.” Crossroads 4,
no. 1 (Fall 1988): 121–27.
Lubeigt, Guy. Shwe-Gyi-Htô, l’art de la Tapisserie Brodée en Birmanie. Paris:
Ed. Kailash, in press.
———. “Vernacular Architecture of Some Ethnic Minorities in Burma (Shan,
Môn, Kachin, Yakaing, Chin).” In Encyclopaedia of Vernacular World Ar-
chitecture. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Mitchiner, Michael. “The Date of the Early Funanese, Mon, Pyu, and
Arakanese Coinages (‘Symbolic Coins’).” Journal of the Siam Society 70
(1982): 5–12.
Moilanen, Irene. “Last of the Great Masters? Woodcarving Traditions in Myan-
mar, Past and Present (Buddhism).” Ph.D. Dissertation, Jyvaskylan
Yliopisto, Finland, 1995.
Moilanen, Irene, and Sergey S. Ozhegov. Mirrored in Wood: Burmese Art and
Architecture. Bangkok: White Lotus, 1999.
Moore, Elizabeth H. “Contemporary Paintings in Burma.” Arts of Asia 22
(September/October 1992): 150–53.
———. “Monasteries of Mandalay: Variation in Architecture and Patronage.” In
Traditions in Current Perspective: Proceedings of the Conference on Myan-
mar and Southeast Asian Studies 15–17 November 1995, Yangon. Rangoon:
The Universities Press, 1996.
Moore, Elizabeth, and San San Maw. “Flights of Fancy, Hintha and Kinnaya,
the Avian Inspiration in Myanmar Art.” Oriental Art 41, no. 2 (1995): 25–31.
Moore, Elizabeth H., Hansjorg Meyer, and U Win Pe. Shwedagon: Golden
Pagoda of Myanmar. London: Thames and Hudson, 1999.
Pichard, Pierre. Inventory of Monuments at Pagan. Gartmore, Scotland:
Kiscadale Publications, 1992.
———. The Pentagonal Monuments of Pagan. Bangkok: White Lotus, 1991.
———. “Sous Les Voûtes De Pagan.” Arts Asiatiques xlvii (1993): 86–109.
Reith, Charlotte. “Comparison of Three Pottery Villages in Shan State, Burma.”
The Journal of Burma Studies 1 (1997): 45–82.
Shwe Mann Maung. “The Largest Alloy Buddha Image.” Myanmar Perspec-
tives 2 (April 1997): 82–83.
06-205 (09) Biblio.qxd 7/13/06 7:52 AM Page 529
BIBLIOGRAPHY • 529
3. Performing Arts
Diamond, Catherine. “Burmese Nights: The Pagoda Festival Pwe in the Age of
Hollywood’s ‘Titanic’.” New Theatre Quarterly 16, no. 3 (August 2000):
227–48.
Khin Mya Kyu. “The Music of Myanmar.” Unesco Courier 45 (March 1992):
48–49.
Maung Sein Tun. Best of the Best Jokes of Zar Ga Na. Long Beach, Calif.:
Maung Sein Tun, n.d.
Thanegi, Ma. The Illusion of Life: Burmese Marionettes. Bangkok: White Or-
chid, 1994.
White Elephants and Golden Ducks: Enchanting Musical Treasures from
Burma. San Francisco: Ko Ko Lay, n.d.
Win Pe. “The Myanmar Female Solo Dance.” Myanmar Perspectives II (April
1997): 41–42.
———. “Myanmar Pure Dance.” Myanmar Perspectives II (June 1997): 30–32.
06-205 (09) Biblio.qxd 7/13/06 7:52 AM Page 530
06-205 (10) Author.qxd 7/13/06 7:54 AM Page 531
531