UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

COLLEGE OF NURSING

RUBRICS FOR ORAL PRESENTATION

Course: _______________________ Topic: ______________________ Student/Group No.: _______________________ Level/Section: _____________

CRITERIA 4 3 2 1 SCORE
Presents information in a logical Presents information in an Presents information in a fairly Presents information in a
and very organized manner organized manner which the organized manner which the disorganized manner which the
ORGANIZATION
which the audience can follow and audience can follow and audience can follow and audience can follow and
understand easily understand easily understand understand
Demonstrates some Demonstrates minimal Demonstrates no understanding
KNOWLEDGE OF Demonstrates full understanding
understanding of the subject understanding of the subject of the subject matter containing
THE SUBJECT of the subject matter containing
matter containing some accurate matter containing minimal significant amount of inaccurate
MATTER accurate content
content accurate content content
Uses graphics that explains well Uses graphics that most often Uses graphics that rarely Uses graphics that do not explain
GRAPHICS and reinforces the text of the reinforces the text of the explains and reinforces the text and reinforce the text of the
presentation presentation of the presentation presentation
TIME Presents 3 minutes beyond the Presents 5 minutes beyond the Presents 7 minutes or more
Presents within the allotted time
MANAGEMENT allotted time allotted time beyond the allotted time

Establishes eye contact and only Occasionally establishes eye

EYE CONTACT occasionally glances at the
report
Consistently uses a clear voice
with correct pronunciation and
DELIVERY
grammar which can be clearly
understood
Establishes eye contact but
frequently glances at the report
Uses a clear voice with correct
pronunciation but incorrect
grammar which makes it difficult
to understand
contact and reads most of the
report
Uses a soft voice with incorrect
pronunciation but correct
grammar which makes it difficult
to understand
Does not establish eye contact
and reads the entire the report
Uses an incomprehensible voice
with incorrect pronunciation and
incorrect grammar which makes
it difficult to understand

Equivalent: 24=100 23=98 22=95 21=93 20=90 19=88 18=85 17=83 16=80 15=78 14=75 13=73
12=70 12=70 11=68 10=65 9=63 8=60 7=58 6=55

Evaluator: _____________________________ Date: ___________________

 UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS
COLLEGE OF NURSING

RUBRICS FOR WRITTEN REPORT

Course: _______________________ Topic: ______________________ Student/Group No.: _______________________ Level/Section: _____________

CRITERIA 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Information is in a logical and very

organized manner which can be
ORGANIZATION
understood very easily; well
developed presentation
Information clearly discusses the
QUALITY OF assigned topic and provides
INFORMATION several supporting details and/or
examples
Information adequately covers all
AMOUNT OF the topics and all the questions
INFORMATION provided are answered very
satisfactorily
Followed the required format; very
neat, well-prepared, has no
STRUCTURE
grammatical, spelling or
punctuation errors
Sources of information are
SOURCES accurately and properly cited
according to the standard format
Information is organized with well-
developed presentation
Information clearly discusses the
assigned topic and provides 1 to 2
supporting details and/or examples
Information adequately covers all
the topics and all the questions
provided are answered
satisfactorily
Followed the required format; neat,
fairly-prepared, with almost no
grammatical, spelling or
punctuation errors
Most of the sources of information
are accurately and properly cited
but a few are not according to the
standard format
Information is logical, but
presentation is not developed well
Information clearly discusses the
assigned topic but does not
provide supporting details and/or
examples
Information adequately covers all
the topics and all the questions
provided are answered fairly
Followed some of the required
format; shows some degree of
being neat and preparedness, with
some grammatical, spelling or
punctuation errors
Some of the sources of information
are accurately and properly cited
and several are not according to
the standard format
Information is disorganized and
has not been developed well.
Information is does not clearly
discuss the assigned topic and
does not provide supporting details
and/or examples
Information is inadequate to cover
all the topics and all the questions
were answered poorly
Did not follow the required format;
untidy, ill-prepared, with many
grammatical, spelling, and
punctuation errors
Sources of information are not
accurately and properly cited
according to the standard format

Equivalent: 20=100 19=97 18=94 17=91 16=88 15=84 14=81 13=78 12=75 11=72 10=69 9=66
8=63 7=59 6=56

Evaluator: _____________________________ Date: ___________________

 UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS
COLLEGE OF NURSING

RUBRICS FOR PEER RATING

Course: _______________________ Topic: ______________________ Student/Group No.: _______________________ Level/Section: _____________

Member 1: Member 2: Member 3: Member 4:

CRITERIA 4 3 2 1

Cooperated with the Cooperated with the Did not cooperate with
Cooperated with the
members in all of the members in some of the members in any of
members only in a
COOPERATION important aspects of the important aspects
few aspects of the
the important aspects
the collaborative of the collaborative of the collaborative
collaborative activity
activity activity activity
Participated in, and Participated in, and
Participated in, and Did not participate in,
contributed to, some contributed to, a few
contributed to, all and contribute to, any
of the relevant of the relevant
relevant discussions; of the relevant
PARTICIPATION Completed his/her fair
discussions; discussions;
discussions; Did not
Completed partially Completed poorly
share of the work complete his/her share
his/her fair share of his/her share of the
required of the work required
the work required work required
Submitted output/s Did not submit any
Submitted output/s in
Submitted output/s in which are output/s, thus
an organized and
QUALITY OF a well-organized, disorganized, non- contributing
synthesized manner
WORK/OUTPUT comprehensive, and synthesized, and insignificantly to the
but lacking some
synthesized manner lacking vital completion of the
information
information. activity
Completed his/her Completed his/her
Completed his/her
share of the work share of the work Did not complete
share of the work
PROMPTNESS IN within the set beyond the set his/her share of the
within the set schedule
SUBMISSION schedule and with schedule and with work even beyond the
and with very minimal
some corrections many corrections set schedule.
corrections.
needed. needed.

Attended all group Attended some of the Attended only a few of

Did not attend group
meetings and group meetings and the group meetings
ATTENDANCE meetings and unable
communicated communicated and communicated
(Face-to-Face/Online) to communicate any
thoughts/feelings thoughts/feelings thoughts/feelings
thoughts/feelings
effectively somewhat effectively ineffectively

Equivalent: 20=100 19=97 18=94 17=91 16=88 15=84 14=81 13=78 12=75 11=72 10=69 9=66 8=63 7=59 6=56

Evaluator: _____________________________ Date: ___________________