Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
KEY TAKEAWAYS
© 2013, Forrester Research, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is strictly prohibited. Information is based on best available
resources. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change. Forrester®, Technographics®, Forrester Wave, RoleView, TechRadar,
and Total Economic Impact are trademarks of Forrester Research, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective companies. To
purchase reprints of this document, please email clientsupport@forrester.com. For additional information, go to www.forrester.com.
FOR INFRASTRUCTURE & OPERATIONS PROFESSIONALS
The Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Backup And Recovery Software, Q2 2013 2
Today’s Backup And Recovery Suites Offer More Than Operational Backup And
Restore
The backup and recovery suites we evaluated in this Forrester Wave evaluation strive to add value
beyond simple operational backup and restore. While the future of backup software is still in flux,
Forrester believes that it will involve more continuity and resiliency tools, additional endpoint
functionality, and cloud-optimized infrastructures. Look for key differentiators in the market, including:
■ Application and hypervisor awareness. The ability to back up key applications nondisruptively
and then quickly restore the entire system or just individual objects is an area where existing
backup solutions are still evolving. All of the evaluated vendors in this Forrester Wave
evaluation have some application expertise, but most still require agents or multiple backups
to achieve granular restore. Similarly, in the hypervisor arena, most vendors have strong
capabilities in the VMware suite, but they lack support for other hypervisors.
■ Advanced backup target integrations. All of the evaluated solutions have the ability to target
virtually any disk or tape target, but the ability to use the cloud as a backup target is an emerging
feature. With interest and adoption of disk-to-disk-to-cloud (D2D2C) backup architectures
starting to take off — 26% of enterprises have already adopted, with another 16% looking to
adopt — this could be a significant differentiator in your decision-making process.1 Additionally,
backup accelerators, which allow for more efficient backups with greater integration between
hardware and software, are increasing in popularity.
■ Continuity and recovery features. As backup strategies become tightly integrated into your
business technology resiliency strategy, the advanced continuity and recovery features in backup
solutions become more important. Today’s backup solutions offer capabilities such as the ability
to boot virtual machines (VMs) directly out of a backup store or the ability to call array-based
snapshots, which are then stored in native formats for quick recovery. These are in addition to
host-based replication and continuous data protection capabilities that started appearing in
backup software suites during the past five years.
Criteria Focus On Key Features, Vision, Ability To Execute And Global Presence
After examining past research, user need assessments, and vendor and expert interviews, we
developed a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria. We evaluated vendors against 61 criteria,
which we grouped into three high-level buckets:
■ Current offering. We evaluated the current offering of the participating vendors by looking
at their capabilities in the arenas of data reduction, primary deduplication, ability to support
different backup targets from tape to cloud, advanced backup, restore and continuity capabilities,
heterogeneous platform support, security and error-checking capabilities, manageability, and
scalability. Forrester evaluated only software capabilities, regardless of whether the vendor
provides a hardware platform.
■ Strategy. The strategy scores are based on the company’s vision for backup and recovery and
its plans for product improvements. In addition, Forrester looked at R&D investments in the
individual products, strategic partnerships, and customer satisfaction (based on customer surveys).
■ Market presence. To measure market presence, Forrester looked at the installed base, total company
revenue and revenue growth, go-to-market partnerships, global customer service coverage,
professional services and consulting capabilities, sales staff, and global geographic presence.
Vendors Have A Scalable Server Backup Suite With Broad Platform Support
Forrester included six vendors in the assessment: ASG, CommVault, EMC, HP, IBM, and Symantec.
Each of these vendors has (see Figure 1):
■ An enterprise backup software solution designed for data center backups. In this evaluation,
Forrester only looked at the software components of vendors’ offerings. Solutions that focused
only on enterprise remote offices, branch offices, or endpoints were not considered in this report.
■ Proven scale for the large enterprise. Vendors included in this evaluation must have more than
100 current customers with more than 1 petabyte (PB) of backup data under management and
at least one customer with more than 10 PB of backup data under management.
■ Heterogeneous platform support. The product must support backups of all major versions of
Windows, Unix, Linux, VMware, Hyper-V, and Citrix Systems.
NetWorker 8.1
Evaluation criteria:
An enterprise backup software solution designed for data center backups. In this evaluation,
Forrester looked only at the software components of vendor’s offerings. Solutions that focused only on
enterprise remote offices, branch offices, or endpoints were not considered in this report.
Proven scale for the large enterprise. Vendors included in this evaluation must have more than 100
current customers with more than 1 petabye (PB) of backup data under management and at least one
customer with more than 10 PB of backup data under management.
Heterogeneous platform support. The product must support backups of all major versions of Windows,
Unix, Linux, VMware, Hyper-V, and Citrix.
■ CommVault, EMC, IBM, and Symantec lead the pack. It’s a tight four-horse race for the
top honors — CommVault, EMC, IBM, and Symantec all scored high on strategy and current
offerings. However, each of these solutions is very different and each presents its own set of
strengths and weaknesses. CommVault touts its simplicity and unified platform, while EMC
has strong integration with its hardware portfolio. IBM excels in extremely large and complex
environments, and Symantec focuses on data and cost reduction.
■ HP offers a competitive alternative. HP trails just behind the lead pack with Data Protector,
a solid solution that just hasn’t seen the focus or investment that it deserves. Under new
management and with a renewed focus on the customer, HP could catch up in the near future.
■ ASG needs to play catch-up. ASG is brand new to the backup market and it shows — the
company is still working to position ASG-Time Navigator in its greater portfolio. While Atempo
has had solutions in the market since 1992, lack of investment in developing the product during
the past several years has resulted in several key features missing in the solution set.
This evaluation of the enterprise backup and recovery software market is intended to be a starting
point only. We encourage clients to view detailed product evaluations and adapt criteria weightings
to fit their individual needs through the Forrester Wave Excel-based vendor comparison tool.
Risky Strong
Bets Contenders Performers Leaders
Strong
CommVault
Go online to download
EMC
IBM the Forrester Wave tool
for more detailed product
Symantec evaluations, feature
HP comparisons, and
customizable rankings.
Current
offering
ASG
Market presence
Weak
Figure 2 Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Backup And Recovery Software, Q2 ’13 (Cont.)
CommVault
Weighting
Forrester’s
Symantec
EMC
ASG
IBM
HP
CURRENT OFFERING 50% 2.28 4.45 4.14 3.30 4.04 3.88
Data reduction capabilities and scalability 15% 2.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 4.00 4.00
Backup targets 10% 1.20 3.18 3.90 2.75 2.35 4.10
Advanced backup options 20% 2.20 4.30 3.45 3.60 3.80 4.10
Encryption 5% 4.50 5.00 3.50 3.50 5.00 5.00
Platform support 10% 4.33 4.38 4.78 4.33 4.33 4.78
Continuity and restore features 10% 2.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 5.00 5.00
Backup verification and error checking 5% 1.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 0.00
Complementary modules 10% 1.00 5.00 3.50 2.50 3.50 3.50
Manageability 10% 2.80 5.00 4.40 3.30 5.00 2.50
Setup and implementation 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Scalability 5% 2.70 3.70 4.30 4.40 3.30 4.40
Leaders: CommVault, EMC, Symantec, And IBM Vie For Top Honors
■ CommVault excels with an integrated platform. CommVault’s primary strategy centers
on providing a single platform for backup, recovery, continuity, archive, and other data
management and protection strategies. The 17-year-old company uses its relative youth to
its advantage, touting a modern approach to data protection. CommVault scored high in the
current offering section and is in a virtual tie for top honors with competitor EMC. Areas of
strength for CommVault include its deduplication capabilities and cloud-target integrations, as
well as hypervisor and application capabilities. The company also received high marks in the
professional services and consulting area, which is a newly expanded offering for CommVault.
While its market share is still considerably smaller than the other giants in the Leaders category,
CommVault continues to see rapid growth, nearly doubling its customer base during the past
four years.
■ EMC focuses on hardware and software integration. The storage giant focuses its backup
software strategy on storage protection across many different silos, architectures, and
applications. While the EMC Backup Portfolio is actually composed of four fairly independent
products — NetWorker, Avamar, Data Protection Advisor, and Data Domain — the company
now licenses the three software solutions together in a capacity-based bundle and has an
objective of eliminating backup silos. There is still additional work ahead for EMC to integrate
these solutions in a tighter fashion. EMC scored high in deduplication capabilities, platform
support, and scalability. It also leads the pack in the strategy section, where it scored very high
in corporate and product strategy and R&D investment.
■ Symantec reinvents itself and refines focus. Symantec’s focus is on backup transformation
and allowing its customers to spend less time, money, and resources on the backup process.
Thus, it is focusing investments on improved management and self-service, automation, and
application integration. While the software vendor has hit some road bumps as a corporate
entity, if the organization can execute on its vision, the new “Symantec 4.0” holds promise for
the backup and recovery division. In this evaluation, Symantec scored high in the platform
support categories, which is consistent with its strategy, as well as continuity and restore features
and R&D investment. Despite Symantec being primarily a software company, NetBackup boasts
some of the most robust hardware integrations, including the ability to control snapshots and
replication on the primary storage and the support of several different backup accelerators.
■ IBM simplifies management, focuses on cloud. IBM’s strategy in the backup and recovery
space is to bring scalable, high-quality, and simple products to market in order to store, analyze,
and protect data. Recently, the company has also placed increased focus on cloud — both
providing capabilities for cloud service providers to use its platform for service offerings and
integrating with cloud storage. One continued weakness for IBM is its lack of integration
with its hardware and services portfolio. While the company has made some improvements
during the past few years, there is still a significant gap between the lines of business. It has,
however, successfully integrated the FastBack and Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) capabilities
into a unified offering. IBM scored well in its current offering, with strengths in deduplication,
manageability (due to significant improvements in TSM Operations Center), continuity, and
restore features.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Online Resource
The online version of Figure 2 is an Excel-based vendor comparison tool that provides detailed
product evaluations and customizable rankings.
■ Vendor surveys. Forrester surveyed vendors on their capabilities as they relate to the evaluation
criteria. Once we analyzed the completed vendor surveys, we conducted vendor calls where
necessary to gather details of vendor qualifications.
■ Customer reference surveys. To validate product and vendor qualifications, Forrester also
conducted online surveys with at least two of each vendor’s current customers.
After examining past research, user need assessments, and vendor and expert interviews, we develop
the initial evaluation criteria. To evaluate the vendors and their products against our set of criteria, we
gather details of product qualifications through a combination of lab evaluations, questionnaires,
demos, and/or discussions with client references. We send evaluations to the vendors for their review,
and we adjust the evaluations to provide the most accurate view of vendor offerings and strategies.
We set default weightings to reflect our analysis of the needs of large user companies — and/or
other scenarios as outlined in the Forrester Wave document — and then score the vendors based
on a clearly defined scale. These default weightings are intended only as a starting point, and we
encourage readers to adapt the weightings to fit their individual needs through the Excel-based
tool. The final scores generate the graphical depiction of the market based on current offering,
strategy, and market presence. Forrester intends to update vendor evaluations regularly as product
capabilities and vendor strategies evolve.
Integrity Policy
All of Forrester’s research, including Forrester Wave evaluations, is conducted according to our Integrity
Policy. For more information, go to http://www.forrester.com/marketing/policies/integrity-policy.html.
ENDNOTES
1
Source: Forrsights Hardware Survey, Q3 2012.
CLIENT SUPPORT
For information on hard-copy or electronic reprints, please contact Client Support
at +1 866.367.7378, +1 617.613.5730, or clientsupport@forrester.com. We offer
quantity discounts and special pricing for academic and nonprofit institutions.
Forrester Focuses On
Infrastructure & Operations Professionals
You are responsible for identifying — and justifying — which technologies
and process changes will help you transform and industrialize your
company’s infrastructure and create a more productive, resilient, and
effective IT organization. Forrester’s subject-matter expertise and
deep understanding of your role will help you create forward-thinking
strategies; weigh opportunity against risk; justify decisions; and optimize
your individual, team, and corporate performance.
Forrester Research, Inc. (Nasdaq: FORR) is an independent research company that provides pragmatic and forward-thinking advice to
global leaders in business and technology. Forrester works with professionals in 13 key roles at major companies providing proprietary
research, customer insight, consulting, events, and peer-to-peer executive programs. For more than 29 years, Forrester has been making
IT, marketing, and technology industry leaders successful every day. For more information, visit www.forrester.com. 90861