Sie sind auf Seite 1von 64

IAS 32, IAS 39, IFRS 7 & IFRS 9

Financial Instruments Standards

CA Pooja Gupta
Mumbai 21 August 2010
IFRS 7
IAS 32

Replacement of
IAS 39

I
A I IAS 39
S A
3 IFRS 9S
2 3
9 Replacement of
Replacement of IAS 39
Prepared
IAS 39 & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
Inside
Financial instruments

Recognition and measurement

Derecognition

Hedge accounting

Presentation

Disclosures

New IFRS 9
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
Key principles
Harmonisation of markets

Global accounting convergence


All derivatives are Most financial
recognised on the assets measured
Enhanced disclosures balance sheet at fair value

Use of fair values


Measurement of the hedging
instrument is the basis for
Benchmark treatment hedge accounting

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Financial Instruments Standards

IAS 39
IAS 32 Recognition /
Presentation Derecognition/
Measurement/
(Debt v/s Derivatives &
Equity) Hedge
Accounting

IFRS 7 IFRS 9
Disclosures of Classification &
Financial Measurement of
Instruments Financial Assets

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Financial Instruments: Scope & Definition

Scope - IAS 39 applies to all entities, but not


all financial instruments

Financial instruments are defined as any contract that


gives rise to:
- a financial asset of one entity and
- a financial liability or equity instrument of another
entity

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Financial assets and liabilities

Financial asset Financial liability Equity instrument

Cash Contractual obligation to Contract evidencing


Equity instrument of another deliver cash or another a residual interest in
entity financial asset or to ex- the assets of an entity
change financial asset or
Contractual right to receive after deducting all of
liabilities under potentially
cash or another financial its liabilities
unfavourable conditions
asset or to exchange
financial assets or liabilities Certain contracts settled in
under potentially the entity’s own equity
favourable conditions
Certain contracts settled in
the entity’s own equity

A financial asset is not always a monetary asset

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Is there a contractual obligation that the
issuer cannot avoid?

Yes No Part

Liability Equity Compound instrument

 Assess at initial recognition  Determine liability component


 Equity is residual
 Classification continues until  No gain or loss
disposal

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 IStaR Ltd. issues 1000 bonds  PV of the principal 100,000/-
convertible into its own shares in 3 payable at the end of 3 yrs (77,200)
years. The bonds are issued at par
with a face value of INR 100/- per PV of the interest 6,000/-
bond. Interest is payable annually at payable annually for
nominal interest at 6% p.a. Each bond 3 years (15,186)
is convertible at anytime up to maturity ------------
in 125 equity shares. When bonds are Total Liability Component (92,386)
issued the prevailing market interest
rate for similar debt without conversion  Proceeds of the Bond 100,000
options is 9% p.a. ------------
 Solution:  Equity component (bal. fig) 7,614
Under this approach, the liability =======
element is valued first, and the
difference between the proceeds of  Discounting factor @ 9%
the bond issue and the fair value of the 1 year 0.917
liability is assigned to the equity 2 year 0.842
component. The present value of the 3 year 0.772
liability component is calculated using
a discount rate of 9%, the market rate
for similar bonds with no conversion
rights.
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
Categories of Financial Assets
Category Definition

Financial assets at fair • Financial assets held for trading


value through profit • Derivatives (unless accounted for as hedges)
or loss (FvPL) • Financial assets designated to this category under
the fair value option

Loans and receivables Non-derivative financial assets with fixed or


(L&R) determinable payments that are not quoted in an
active market

Held-
Held-to-
to-maturity Non-derivative financial assets with fixed or
(HTM) determinable payments and fixed maturity that the
entity has the positive intent and ability to hold to
maturity

Available-
Available-for-
for-sale • All financial assets that are not classified in
(AFS) another category. Called the ‘residual’ category

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Categories of Financial Liabilities

Category Definition

Financial liabilities at • Financial liabilities held for trading


fair value through
profit or loss (FvPL) • Derivatives (unless accounted for as hedges)

• Financial liability designated to this category


under the fair value option

Other financial All financial liabilities that are not classified at fair
liabilities value through profit or loss. ‘Residual’ category

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Derivatives
Derivatives are instruments with all three of the following characteristics

 Value changes in response to changes in specified underlying price/


index (e.g. interest rate, FX rate, share price)

 Requires no or little net investment

 Settled at a future date

Examples of derivatives

 Forward FX contract

 Interest rate swap

 Collar and Caps

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Component of hybrid instrument that includes a non-
derivative host contract
Host Contract

Executory Equity
contract Embedded derivative
FX Option
Commodity index
Inflation index
Equity index
Debt Insurance
Lease
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
Conditions for separation

Split and account separately


Is the
contract Will it be a Is it closely
carried at fair derivative if it related to
No was a Yes the host No
value
through freestanding? contract
profit or loss

Yes No Yes

Do not split the embedded derivative

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Accounting following separation:

Host: apply rules of IAS 39 or other applicable IAS/IFRS if host is not a


financial instrument
Derivative: measure the separated derivative at fair value through
profit or loss

Accounting when separation is difficult:


If it is difficult to determine the fair value of the embedded derivative, it
is deemed to be the difference between the fair value of the combined
(hybrid) instrument and the fair value of the host contract

Accounting when impossible to separate:


If the embedded derivative cannot be reliably identified and measured,
the entire combined contract is accounted for as a financial
instrument at fair value

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


All financial assets and financial liabilities, including derivatives,
should be recognised on the balance sheet at fair value when
the entity becomes party to the contractual provisions of the
instrument

Financial assets Financial liabilities


@ @
“fair value of “fair value of
consideration consideration
given” received”

Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged


or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an
arm’s length transaction

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Instrument Measurement Value changes

Financial assets at fair Profit &Loss


value through profit or loss Fair value

Held-to-maturity Amortised cost Not relevant


investments (Effective Interest Rate) (unless impaired)
Amortised cost Not relevant
Loans and receivables
(Effective Interest Rate) (unless impaired)

Fair value Equity


Available-for-sale
(unless impaired)

Financial liabilities at fair Profit & Loss


Fair value
value through profit or loss

Amortised cost
Other liabilities Not relevant
(effective interest rate)

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Initial Principal
Amortised Accumulated Impairment
recognition repayments
cost = amount - -/+ interest - reduction

Amortisation is calculated using the effective interest rate method

The effective interest rate is defined as “the rate that exactly discounts
estimated future cash flows through the expected life of the financial
instrument or, where appropriate, a shorter period to the net carrying
amount of the financial asset or financial liability”.

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Effective Interest Rate

Product Auto Loan

Tenor (Contractual Life) 5 years

Expected life (Actuarial Life) 3 years

Loan Amount 500,000/-

Transaction Costs & Fees 5,000/-

Interest rate 10%

EMI (Yearly) 131,899/-

EIR (calculated) 9.53%

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Effective Interest Rate

No EIR EIR

Interest Prin EMI O/s Interest Prin EMI O/s Txn


Costs

1 50,000 81,899 131,899 418,101 48,106 83,793 131,899 421,207 1,894

2 41,810 90,089 131,899 328,013 40,124 91,775 131,899 329,432 1,686

3 32,801 99,097 131,899 228,915 31,382 100,517 131,899 228,915 1,424

4 22,892 109,007 131,899 119,908 22,892 109,007 131,899 119,908 0

5 11,991 119,908 131,899 0 11,991 119,908 131,899 0 0

159,494 154,494

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


How do you define an active market
is subject to judgement and hence
the guidance issued by the expert
panel of the IASB in September’08

Active market: unadjusted published price


quotations

No active market: valuation


techniques

No active market: Unquoted Equity


investments (-) impairment loss

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Transfer Trading Loans and Held-to- Available
to: receivables maturity for sale
Transfer
from
Trading Not Not Not Not
Applicable permitted permitted permitted
Loans and If pattern of Not Not Not
receivables short term Applicable Applicable permitted
profit making
Held-to- Tainting Not Not Tainting
maturity Applicable Applicable
Available for If pattern of Not Change in Not
sale short term permitted intent and if Applicable
profit making all criteria
met

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Change of intent or
Sales before maturity
ability
reclassify ALL HTM
reclassify ALL HTM
instruments
instruments

“Tainting” leads to measurement at fair value

And classification as AFS assets for two full financial


years
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
 De-recognition rules were developed to deal with ‘off
balance sheet financing’

 The standard combines the ‘risk and rewards


approach’ and ‘control approach’

 IAS 39 details principles for:


 Complete de-recognition
 Partial de-recognition (e.g. servicing rights
retained)
 De-recognition combined with recognition of a new
liability (e.g. credit risk guaranteed)

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 The part comprises only specifically identified
cash flows from a financial asset (e.g. sale of an
interest only strip)

 The part comprises only a fully proportionate


(pro rata) share of the cash flows from a
financial asset (e.g. sale of 90% of the asset)

 The part comprises only a fully proportionate


share of specifically identified cash flows from a
financial asset (e.g. sale of 90% of an interest
only strip)

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Consolidation

Part or entire asset?

YES
Rights to cash flows expired? Derecognition

NO

Rights to cash flows transferred?

NO
YES NO
Pass through arrangement? No derecognition

YES
YES
Substantially all risks and rewards Derecognition
transferred?

NO
YES
Substantially all risks and rewards No derecognition
retained?
NO
NO
Control retained? Derecognition

YES
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
Continuing involvement
 First, consolidate all subsidiaries (including all SPEs)
 Derecognition provisions are applied on a consolidated level

 Then, consider the subject of the derecognition provisions (financial


asset, group of similar financial assets or a portion of a financial
instruments or a group of similar financial instruments)

 Then, apply derecognition rules:

Derecognise when contractual rights to cash flows expire or


 There is a “transfer of a financial asset” and
 That transfer qualifies for derecognition

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


“Transfer of a financial asset” requires
 A transfer of the contractual rights to receive the Cash
Flows; or
 Meeting the “pass-through requirements” in IAS 39.19

If financial asset has been transferred, then assess whether


transfer qualifies for derecognition
 If substantially all risks and rewards are retained
 If substantially all risks and rewards are transferred
 If some but not substantially all risks and rewards have
been transferred:
 Control -> Continuing involvement

Risk- Rewards & Control model !


Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
 Financial liability (or part thereof) is removed
from the balance sheet when it is extinguished,
i.e. when the obligation is discharged or cancelled
or expires

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 Securitisations

 Securities lending

 Repurchase agreements

 Partial transfers of assets/liabilities

 Transfers involving special purpose entities

 Derecognition coupled with a new asset or liability

Derecognition rules are strict!!!


Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
 A securitisation is a transaction that transforms a
financial asset(s) into securities

 Intent is often to achieve derecognition of the


financial assets securitized

 Securitised assets often are transferred to a


special purpose entity (SPE)

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


To match the timing differences of recognising the
effect of hedging instrument and hedged item or
measurement differences if hedged item not at FV

Recognition mismatches Measurement mismatches


between hedged item
between hedged item
and hedging instruments
and hedging instruments
i.e.
i.e.
because the hedged item is
because the hedged item is
not yet
not
recognised in the balance
measured at fair value
sheet or in the income
statement

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


What can qualify as a hedged item ?

An exposure to a risk A HTM investment for


that affects the income interest rate risk
statement
A general business risk
An AFS security
Investment in associate or
A loan / receivable subsidiary
Foreign currency Non financial asset or
monetary item liability

What can be used as a hedging instrument?

• External instruments only for Group hedging


• Generally derivatives
• May be a portion of the instrument (eg 50%) but not a portion of time
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
The criteria for hedge accounting is onerous and have system implications
for all entities. Hedge Accounting is OPTIONAL and management should
consider the cost and benefits to use it.

1. Hedge relationship must be documented at inception


– Risk management objective and strategy for the hedge
– Identification of the hedging instrument
– The related hedged item or transaction
– The nature of the risk being hedged
– How hedging instrument’s effectiveness will be assessed
2(a) Hedge must be expected to be highly effective at inception and
subsequent periods
2(b) Hedge effectiveness must be tested regularly throughout its life

2(c) Effectiveness must fall within the range of 80% - 125% over the life of the
hedge
3. In the case of hedging future cash flows, there must be a high probability
of that cash flow occurring
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
 IAS 39 does not specify a single method for
assessing hedge effectiveness prospectively or
retrospectively.
 The method an entity adopts depends on its risk
management strategy and should be included in
the documentation at the inception of the hedge.
 The most common methods used are:
• critical terms comparison;
• dollar offset method; and
• regression analysis.

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 Comparing the critical terms of the hedging instrument with those
of the hedged item.

 Hedge relationship is expected to be highly effective where all


the principal terms of the hedging instrument and the hedged
item match exactly – for example, notional and principal
amounts, credit risk (AA), term, pricing, re-pricing dates (aligned
to test date), timing, quantum and currency of cash flows – and
there are no features (such as optionality) that would invalidate
an assumption of perfect effectiveness.

 Does not require any calculations.

 May only be used in the limited cases, but in such cases it is the
simplest way to demonstrate that a hedge is expected to be
highly effective (prospective effectiveness testing).

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 The dollar offset method can be performed using different approaches, including the
following:
• Hypothetical derivative approach. The hedged risk is modelled as a derivative
called a ‘hypothetical derivative’ (as it does not exist). The hypothetical derivative
approach compares the change in the fair value or cash flows of the hedging
instrument with the change in the fair value or cash flows of the hypothetical
derivative.
• Benchmark rate approach: ‘target’ rate established for the hedge. In an interest
rate hedge of a variable rate debt instrument using an interest rate swap, the
benchmark rate is usually the fixed rate of the swap at the inception of the hedge.
The benchmark rate approach first identifies the difference between the actual cash
flows of the hedging item and the benchmark rate. It then compares the change in
the amount or value of this difference with the change in the cash flow or fair value
of the hedging instrument.
• Sensitivity analysis approach: assess the effectiveness of a hedge prospectively.
This method consists of measuring the effect of a hypothetical shift in the underlying
hedged risk (for example, a 10% shift in the foreign currency exchange rate being
hedged) on both the hedging instrument and the hedged item.

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 This statistical method investigates the strength of the
statistical relationship between the hedged item and the
hedging instrument.

 Provides a means of expressing, in a systematic fashion,


the extent by which one variable, ‘the dependent’, will vary
with changes in another variable, ‘the independent’.

 The independent variable reflects the change in the value


of the hedged item, and the dependent variable reflects the
change in the value of the hedging instrument.

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Types of risks which can be hedged

FX Credit Equity Interest Commodity

Exposure to risk can arise from changes in

Probable
Future cash
Fair value future cash
flows
flows

IAS 39 recognizes 3 types of relationship

1. Fair Value Hedge


2. Cash Flow Hedge
3. Hedges of Net Investment in Foreign Entity

A common strategy in risk management is hedging, where risks that


an entity faces are reduced or eliminated by entering into
transactions that give an offsetting risk profile
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
Hedge of exposure to changes in fair value of a recognised asset or liability, an
unrecognised firm commitment or an identified portion of either of these that is
attributable to a particular risk and could affect P&L

Without hedge accounting


Measurement of
derivative hedging Measurement of
instrument hedged item

Amortised cost
FV through P&L or
Available-for-sale
Measurement or (FVthrough equity)
performance reporting
mismatch

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


1 2 Total
Hedged item 0 (20) (20)

Hedging instrument 20 0 20
20 (20) 0

Accelerate recognition of gain or loss on hedged item

The use of hedge accounting allows an entity to reflect the economics of a hedge
relationship in the financial statements by matching offsetting gains and losses in
P&L in the same period
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
Risk being hedged is the change in the ‘fair value’ of
or identified portion of an asset, liability or
unrecognized firm commitment

Hedging instrument –
Change in fair value

INCOME
STATEMENT

Hedged item –
Adjust the
carrying amount

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Hedge of exposure to variability in cash flows that is:
1. Attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability
or a highly probable forecast transaction; and
2. Could affect profit or loss

Without hedge accounting


Measurement of
derivative hedging Measurement of hedged
instrument item

FV through P&L Not yet recognised in


the accounts
Recognition mismatch

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


1 2 Total
Hedged item 0 (20) (20)

Hedging instrument 20 0 20
20 (20) 0

Defer recognition of gains or losses on hedging


instrument

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Risk being hedged is exposure to variability in ‘cash flows’ of an asset,
liability or unrecognized firm commitment

Hedging instrument – Change in


fair value

Effective Ineffective

EQUITY INCOME STATEMENT


(Hedging Reserve)

Recycled when hedged items affect earnings

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, as defined in IAS 21

Without hedge accounting


Measurement of hedging Measurement of
instrument hedged item
FV through P&L (derivatives)
OR FX gains / losses
FX gain/loss through P&L through equity
(foreign currency loan)

Performance reporting
mismatch
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
Income
Statement Equity Total
Hedged item 0 (20) (20)

Hedging instrument 20 0 20
20 (20) 0

Match recognition (in equity) of gains or losses on the


hedging instrument

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 Hedge of a net investment in a foreign
operation (including a hedge of a monetary
item that is accounted for as part of the net
investment)

 Hedging instruments can be foreign currency


monetary items or derivatives

 Accounting similar to cash flow hedges

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 PP Bank issues $100m of debt at a fixed interest rate e.g. at 8%. To avoid a
mismatch between the interest it pays for funding and the floating interest rate it
receives on loans, the bank takes out an interest rate swap. The swap has the
affect of PP paying a floating rate of interest on the issued debt, say at 11%
instead of the 8% fixed (PP continues to pay fixed interest to the debt holders,
but receives fixed interest from, and pays floating to, the swap counterparty)

ASSETS IRS - PP pay $ LIABILITIES


floating interest
PP’s Assets to swap PP’s Issued
with $ floating counterparty debt at a fixed
interest rates receives $ rate
fixed interest
from swap

• Impact on financials:
When the interest on debt increases leading to decrease in the carrying amount of
the debt by $10m. This has equal corresponding effect on notional amount of swap.
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
IAS Achieve IAS Fail Hedge
Hedge Accounting Accounting
BALANCE SHEET USD Mio USD Mio

Derivative Asset / (Liability) (13) (13)

Issued Debt (100) (100)


Fair value adjustment to
Issued debt (increase) /
decrease 10 Nil

Net issued debt Liability (90) (100)


P & L ACCOUNT
Net Interest Income COUPON (8) (8)

SWAP ACCRUAL (3) 0

NET (11) (8)

DEAL PROFIT AND LOSS SWAP MTM (10) (13)

ISSUED DEBT FV
ADJUSTMENT 10 NIL

NETPrepared
PROFIT AND LOSS by CA Pooja Gupta
& Presented (11) (21) 20-Aug-10
Hedge accounting must be discontinued prospectively if:

 The hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated


or exercised

 The hedge no longer meets the IAS 39 criteria for


hedge accounting (e.g. forecast transaction no
longer highly probable)

 The entity revokes the designation

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


A legally enforceable right to set off

An intention to settle net or to realise the


asset and settle the liability
simultaneously
&
Master netting agreements
Several instruments used to emulate a single instrument (synthetic
instrument)
Items with the same risk, but different counterparties
Financial assets pledged as collateral for non-recourse liabilities
Assets set aside in a trust to discharge a liability that have not been
accepted by the creditor (sinking fund arrangements)
Obligations as a result of losses recoverable via insurance
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
 Objectives
 Improvement of existing requirements as regards
exposure and management of risks arising from
financial instruments
 Removing unnecessarily onerous or duplicative
disclosures
 Relocating in one place all disclosure
requirements on financial instruments

 Scope
 All risks arising from financial instruments
 All entities

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


IFRS 7

Classes of financial Significance of financial Nature and extent of


instruments and level instruments for financial risks arising from
of disclosure position and performance financial instruments

Balance Other Qualitative Quantitative


sheet disclosures disclosures disclosures

Income statement and


equity

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 Balance sheet
 Carrying amounts by “Classes” of financial
instruments

 Impact of credit risk on financial liabilities


designated as at fair value through P&L

 Credit risk disclosure on loans and receivables


designated as at fair value through P&L

 Reconciliation of changes in allowance


accounts for credit losses

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 Income statement
 Net gains and losses for all categories of
financial assets and liabilities
 Fee income and expense arising from financial
instruments and trust/fiduciary activities

 Other disclosures
 Impact in the period P&L of hedges by category
 Accounting policy and net position of Day 1
differences when fair value is determined using
non observable market data.

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 Issued by the IASB on 12 November 2009

 Impacts banks and insurance companies most significantly, but all


entities that hold financial assets will be affected.

 The effective date of the new classification and measurement


guidance is 1 January 2013; early application is permitted.

 IFRS 9 should be applied retrospectively; however, if adopted


before 1 January 2012, comparative periods do not need to be
restated.

 In addition, entities adopting before 1 January 2011 are allowed


to designate any date between then and the date of issuance of
IFRS 9, as the date of initial application that will be the date
upon which the classification of financial assets will be
determined.

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 IFRS 9 replaces the multiple classification and measurement
models in IAS 39 with a single model that has only two
classification categories: amortized cost and fair value.

 Classification is driven by the entity’s business model for


managing the financial assets and the contractual characteristics
of the financial assets.

 A financial asset is measured at amortized cost if two criteria are


met: a) the objective of the business model is to hold the
financial asset for the collection of the contractual cash flows,
and b) the contractual cash flows under the instrument solely
represent payments of principal and interest.

 Requirement to separate embedded derivatives from financial


asset hosts removed. It requires a hybrid contract to be classified
inPrepared
its entirety at either
& Presented amortized
by CA Pooja Gupta cost or fair value. 20-Aug-10
 Two of the existing three fair value option criteria become
obsolete, as a fair value driven business model requires fair value
accounting, and hybrid contracts are classified in their entirety.
Accounting mismatch condition carried forward to the new
standard.

 Prohibits reclassifications except in rare circumstances when the


entity’s business model changes; in this case, the entity is
required to reclassify affected financial assets prospectively.

 All equity investments should be measured at fair value.

 Removes the cost exemption for unquoted equities and


derivatives on unquoted equities .

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


 IFRS 9 first milestone in the IASB’s planned replacement of IAS 39.

 The next steps involve:


- Reconsideration and re-exposure of the Classification and
measurement requirements for financial liabilities
- Exploration and field testing of the proposed Impairment approach
for financial assets; and
- Development of enhanced guidance on Hedge Accounting.

 IASB aims to fully replace IAS 39 by the end of 2010.

 Indication that the effective date of IFRS 9 may be pushed back to


align the mandatory adoption of the standard with the effective
dates for IAS 39 replacement stage II – ‘Amortized cost and
impairment’ and ‘Insurance’ projects.

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10


Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
Experiences!!!

Comments!!!

Questions!!
Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10
Questions / Comments / Feedback
www.capoojagupta.blogspot.com

Presenter’s contact details


CA Pooja Gupta
+91 – 9821504041
capooja@yahoo.com

Prepared & Presented by CA Pooja Gupta 20-Aug-10

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen