Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Y3 Fe5 O12 thin films with thickness 10 nm ≤ t ≤ 1440 nm were grown on Gd3 Ga5 O12 (111) substrates by pulsed laser
deposition. The X-ray diffraction experiments confirmed the films are pure yttrium iron garnet (YIG) phase with preferred
(111) orientation. The magnetic and microwave properties were studied as a function of film thickness by the dc magnetization and
ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) measurements. The FMR linewidth (H) was found to decrease with the increase in film thickness
(10 nm ≤ t ≤ 45 nm), attaining a minimum value of H⊥ = 5 Oe and H|| = 6 Oe, for perpendicular and parallel resonance, and
then rising with further increase in thickness. Acid etching experiments were performed to understand the mechanism contributing
to H. The increase in H with thickness (t > 45 nm) may be explained in terms of extrinsic mechanisms, such as inhomogeneities
present at the surface of the films. However, the decrease in H with thickness (t < 45 nm) is believed to be due to the
surface anisotropy effect. The films showed low coercivity values in the range of ∼1.5–7 Oe, which is an indicator of good quality
YIG films.
Index Terms— Ferromagnetic resonance (FMR), linewidth, microwave.
Fig. 3. Hysteresis loops of ∼15 and 1440 nm thick YIG/GGG films. Fig. 4. H⊥ of YIG thin films as a function of acid etching time for
Inset: coercivity as a function of thickness. ∼850 nm YIG film.
IV. D ISCUSSION
One of the important results from our study is that we
are able to get a low linewidth of 5 Oe in a polycrystalline Fig. 5. H⊥ of YIG thin films as a function of acid etching time for ∼45 nm
YIG film by carefully optimizing the deposition parameters. YIG film. Inset: Dots–experimental data H⊥ . Lines–A/t fitting to linewidth
The other interesting fact is that we find a sharp decrease in at low thickness range (<45 nm).
H with thickness in the range ∼10–45 nm. For thicknesses
above ∼45 nm, the H is found to increases slowly. Many
authors have observed a decrease in H in the case of metallic from ∼10 to 45 nm. Similar to our result, Liu et al. [10]
thin films with the increase in thickness in the range of reported the effect of thickness on H in YIG thin films pre-
2–30 nm and explained it on the basis of two-magnon process, pared by RF sputtering and observed a decrease in H value
anisotropy field, or surface inhomogeneity [12]–[14]. from 25 to 5 Oe as the thickness increased from 5 to 100 nm.
To understand if the quality of the film is responsible for They have explained this phenomenon on the basis of
change in H as a function of thickness, we carried out an surface-assisted damping (such as magnon–phonon scattering,
acid etching experiment on selected YIG films. We decreased two-magnon scattering, or charge transfer relaxation).
the thickness of the films by etching it in concentrated HCl Sun et al. [15] performed an ion milling experiment on PLD
for different periods of time and FMR spectra were recorded. deposited YIG films to study the effect of etching time on
Fig. 4 shows the H⊥ for ∼850 nm YIG film as a function H and reported that the surface inhomogeneity is a possible
of etching time. We note that the H⊥ values drop sharply reason for H broadening.
from 15 to 9 Oe after a 5 min etch time and then saturate To understand the origin of linewidth broadening in our
to a value of 7 Oe at 90 min of etching. This implies that YIG films at lower thickness, we performed another acid
the inhomogeneous regions present on the surface of the film etching experiment on ∼45 nm films and the result is presented
were the primary source for H⊥ broadening in the case of in Fig. 5. It was observed that the H⊥ gradually increases
thicker YIG films. Thus, the presence of secondary resonance with etching time, i.e., with reduction in thickness, similar
peaks in thicker films can be seen to arise from the presence to the result shown in Fig. 2(b). Acid etching has been seen
of inhomogeneities in those films. to reduce the surface inhomogeneities and hence the observed
On the other hand, in the low thickness range, the increment in H⊥ value with reduction in thickness must arise
H decreases from 30 to 5 Oe as the thickness increases from some intrinsic phenomena.
2800704 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 51, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2015
Kuanr et al. [12] reported the thickness (t) dependence They would also like to thank Dr. R. Krishnan, Retired
of H in iron thin films in the range 2 to 30 nm Scientist, CNRS/Universite de Versailles–St-Quentin, France,
and have observed a decrease in the value of H with for his helpful discussions.
increase of thickness. They have fitted their H to 1/t 2
curve. They have attributed this feature to be consis- R EFERENCES
tent with a two-magnon process. We tried to fit our [1] M. Pardavi-Horvath, “Microwave applications of soft ferrites,” J. Magn.
experimental result to 1/t 2 for lower thickness films Magn. Mater., vols. 215–216, pp. 171–183, Jun. 2006.
(from ∼10–45 nm), but the fitting is not at all close to [2] B. Lax and K. J. Button, Microwave Ferrites and Ferromagnetic.
experimental data and was far from satisfactory. Our exper- New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
[3] S. A. Manuilov, R. Fors, S. I. Khartsev, and A. M. Grishin, “Submicron
imental data, on the other hand, showed a better fit to 1/t Y3 Fe5 O12 film magnetostatic wave band pass filters,” J. Appl. Phys.,
[Fig. 5 (inset)]. Such behavior may be due to the anisotropy vol. 105, no. 3, 033917, 2009.
field [12], [13]. In addition, in our samples, we get a large [4] Z. Wang et al., “Electric control of magnetization relaxation in thin film
magnetic insulators,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 99, no. 16, 162511, 2011.
value of anisotropy field (Heff = 4π Meff − 4π M S ) in terms
[5] C. W. Sandweg, Y. Kajiwara, K. Ando, E. Saitoh, and B. Hillebrands,
of 4π Meff evaluated from FMR measurement (shows a value “Enhancement of the spin pumping efficiency by spin wave mode
of 1930–2320 G) which is much higher than the bulk selection,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 97, no. 25, 252504, 2010.
4π M S value of YIG. The origin of such large in-plane [6] E. Padrón-Hernández, A. Azevedo, and S. M. Rezende, “Amplification
of spin waves by thermal spin-transfer torque,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 107,
anisotropy field could be due to stress and is under detailed 197203, Nov. 2011.
investigation. [7] Y. Krockenberger, K.-S. Yun, T. Hatano, S. Arisawa, M. Kawasaki,
and Y. Tokura, “Layer-by-layer growth and magnetic properties of
V. C ONCLUSION Y3 Fe5 O12 thin films on Gd3 Ga5 O12 ,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 106, no. 12,
123911, 2009.
The magnetic properties of YIG thin films with different [8] N. B. Ibrahim, C. Edwards, and S. B. Palmer, “Pulsed laser ablation
thicknesses (10 nm ≤ t ≤ 1440 nm) grown on GGG deposition of yttrium iron garnet and cerium-substituted YIG films,”
(111) substrates by PLD have been studied by the J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 220, nos. 2–3, pp. 183–194, Oct. 2000.
[9] J. Dash et al., “Study of magnetization and crystallization in sputter
FMR technique and SQUID magnetometry. Our films showed deposited LiZn ferrite thin films,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 86, no. 6,
4π M S values close to the bulk value of YIG except for the pp. 3303–3311, 1999.
low thickness films (t ≤ 15 nm). For t > 45 nm films, the [10] T. Liu et al., “Ferromagnetic resonance of sputtered yttrium iron garnet
nanometer films,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 115, no. 17, 17A501, 2014.
linewidth increased with film thickness and surface inhomo-
[11] P. C. Dorsey, S. E. Bushnell, R. G. Seed, and C. Vittoria, “Epitaxial
geneity is seen to be the primary source for H broadening. yttrium iron garnet films grown by pulsed laser deposition,” J. Appl.
For t < 45 nm films, the surface anisotropy field may be the Phys., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 1242–1248, 1993.
primary contribution to H . The films showed a low HC value [12] B. K. Kuanr, A. V. Kuanr, R. E. Camley, and Z. Celinski, “Magnetization
relaxation in sputtered thin Fe films: An FMR study,” IEEE Trans.
in the range of ∼1.5–7 Oe, which is an indicator of good Magn., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2930–2932, Oct. 2006.
quality YIG films. From the detailed analysis, it is evident [13] W. Platow, A. N. Anisimov, G. L. Dunifer, M. Farle, and K. Baberschke,
that the film thickness and surface quality play a significant “Correlations between ferromagnetic-resonance linewidths and sample
quality in the study of metallic ultrathin films,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 58,
role in determining the microwave loss. pp. 5611–5621, Sep. 1998.
[14] C. E. Patton, C. H. Wilts, and F. B. Humphrey, “Relaxation processes
ACKNOWLEDGMENT for ferromagnetic resonance in thin films,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 38, no. 3,
This work was supported by the Australian–Indian Research pp. 1358–1359, 1967.
[15] Y. Sun et al., “Growth and ferromagnetic resonance properties of
Fund. The authors would like to thank IRCC and IITB for nanometer-thick yttrium iron garnet films,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 101,
superconducting quantum interference device measurements. no. 15, 152405, 2012.