Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Opening statement:
Arguments:
● Going to Mars is a crucial part of human survival
● NASA has restrictions and it is important to have partnerships with private companies. --
The private sector will find a way to develop technology and early exploration-- Space X
is a private company that has already developed technologies that could get us to the
moon in fewer years.
● NASA would not be able to make it to Mars without partnerships with private companies-
private companies provide funding for NASA
● Settling on Mars would involve a lot of one-way missions and that is something that
NASA is not willing to do.
Evidence/Supports:
The climate related disasters around the U.S. have already cost
the government billions.
According to a source from Wordpress called Global Warming
:How Long Do We Have Left, ”We have already reached
dangerous levels. The heat waves throughout the northern
hemisphere this summer have cost plenty, to the economy, in
human suffering, ill health, even lives lost. The wildfires in
California this year were much worse than they would have been
without global warming. Just last year we set a new record for the
total cost of billion-dollar climate-related disasters. They cost the
U.S. over $300 billion”. Partnering with private companies will
allow the government to focus on may of the other issues in our
society that need attention and money. The government cannot
possibly give more money to NASA, but private companies can.
This is the only way that NASA will be able to make it to Mars and
solve the mountain of issues we are facing today.
You may say that corporations are corrupt and could try to exploit
Mars, but the government could fix this by regulating what
corporations are allowed to do. The private companies that work
with NASA should be innovating new technologies and helping to
actually colonize Mars while the government should be doing what
they do best, regulating.
Rebuttal:
● It is apart of human nature to explore and mars can and should be
settled on. Mars is the new world for this generation and many to come.
In the human spirit we inherit exploration, settlement, and colonization.
Failure to terraform and colonize mars would constitute a failure to live
up to our human nature.
● We are running out of resources on our planet and more resources exist
in space. Humanity's potential for growth is unlimited. If we don’t colonize
mars, we will be betraying our responsibility as members of the
community of life itself.
● Some people might say that companies will exploit Mars, but the
companies that NASA is already working with share the same goal to
colonize Mars for scientific purposes. There may be some companies
who want to exploit Mars, but those are not the companies that NASA is
and will be working with.
● You say that the private companies are corrupt but in reality it is the
government that is corrupt. As stated before, too many people that are
appointed by the government to work for nasa are soon being sent to
prison for crimes committed on the job.
● There are options for shielding from radiation such as thicker hulls
or water jacketing but this increases mass, which increases the
price because of fuel consumption. If we can't protect the
astronauts with this we won't be going in the first place. NASA
cannot pay for this on their own and they need the help of paying
for this with private companies.
Rebuttal speech:
We can both agree that we need to get to mars. Me
and my partner are arguing that NASA should partner
with private companies. Getting to Mars is not NASA’s
top priority, they have many other responsibilities as a
company. Also as stated before, other private
companies are getting farther than NASA in the
mission. You all said that we will contaminate mars
but There is a way to prevent invasive earth bacteria
from destroying mars. NASA goes to great lengths to
sterilize spacecraft designed to land on mars. NASA
along with the private companies they are partnered
are working together to fill the knowledge gaps that
come with the topic of contamination mars. NASA
would not be able to do this without the help of private
companies. Some people might say that companies
will exploit Mars, but the companies that NASA is
already working with share the same goal to colonize
Mars for scientific purposes. There may be some
companies who want to exploit Mars, but those are
not the companies that NASA is and will be working
with. Also it isn't feasible for congress to give NASA
more money. NASA will already be able to regulate
companies in Mars because of the funding they are
receiving from private companies. The private
companies are funding NASA to be able to work with
them and get to Mars. The private companies are
funding NASA to be able to work with them and get to
Mars. If the two forces work together the mission will
be taken very seriously. The government should be
allowed to regulate the activity on Mars, but private
companies are the ones who should be colonizing
Mars and innovating new technologies for the
advancement of space research. The government
needs to do what they do best, which is regulating
people.
You say that congress should just give NASA more money. Did
you know that NASA already receives .49% of the total federal
budget (4.4 trillion) for the United States? That’s 21.5 billion
dollars that they receive. How much money do you believe is
enough? When is the government spending too much of their
budget on NASA?
Conclusion: