MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater: LIRA M. LIBANAN

Position:TEACHER 1 Position:HT 1/SCHOOL HEAD
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: E. SAMAR Date of Review: OCTOBER 28,2019
Rating Period: JU2019NE-OCTOBER

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-

Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

Basic 1. 1. Applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 4 4

Education Conte knowledge of (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services nt content within and inter-observer agreement
Knowl across curriculum form about knowledge of
edge teaching areas. content within and across
and curriculum teaching areas
Pedag 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs 4 4
ogy developed highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
3. Instructional materials Efficiency 4 4
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration in
other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

Basic 2. Used a range of 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 4 4

Education teaching (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services strategies that inter-observer agreement
enhance learner form about teaching
achievement in strategies that enhance
literacy and learner achievement in
numeracy skills. literacy and numeracy skills
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs 3 3
used in teaching highlighting
learner-centered strategies
that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
3. Instructional materials
highlighting learner-centered Efficiency 4 4
strategies that promote
literacy and/or numeracy
skills
4. Performance tasks/test 4 4
material(s) used in teaching
5. Results of assessment used 4 4
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

Basic 3. Applied a range 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 4 4

Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services strategies to inter-observer agreement
develop critical form about teaching
and creative strategies to develop critical
thinking, as well and creative thinking, as well
as other higher- as other higher-order
order thinking thinking skills
skills. 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs 4 3
used in teaching highlighting
different teaching strategies
that develop critical and
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
3. Instructional materials Efficiency 4 4
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and creative
thinking and/or other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test 4 3
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used 3 3
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 2. 4. Managed 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 4 4
Education Learni classroom (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services ng structure to inter-observer agreement
Enviro engage learners, form about managing
nment individually or in classroom structure that
and groups, in
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

Diversi meaningful engages learners in various Efficiency 4 3

ty of exploration, activities
Learne discovery and 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
rs hands-on activities highlighting various
within a range of classroom management
physical learning strategies that engage
environments. learners in activities/tasks in
different physical learning
environments Timeliness
3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation tool Quality
Education learner behavior (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services constructively by observer agreement form about
applying positive teacher management of learner
and non-violent behavior using the following
discipline to strategies:
ensure learning- 1. Providing motivation 4 4
focused 2. Praising the learners/Giving
environments. positive feedback Efficiency 3 3
3. Setting house
rules/guidelines 3 3
4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation 4 4
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions 4 4
6. Giving equal opportunities to
learners 4 4
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions 4 4
8. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

Basic 6. Used 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 4 3

Education differentiated, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services developmentally inter-observer agreement
appropriate form about using
learning differentiated,
experiences to developmentally appropriate
address learners’ learning experiences
gender, needs, 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs 3 3
strengths, developed highlighting
interests and differentiation in content,
experiences. product, process, learning Efficiency
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
3. Instructional materials 3 3
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
4. Others (Please specify and
Timeliness
provide annotations)
Basic 3. 7. Planned, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 4 4
Education Curric managed and (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services ulum implemented inter-observer agreement
and developmentally form about using
Planni sequenced developmentally sequenced
ng teaching and teaching and learning
learning process
processes to meet 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs 4 4
curriculum highlighting developmentally
requirements and sequenced instruction that
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

varied teaching meet curriculum goals and Efficiency

contexts. varied teaching contexts
3. Instructional materials used 4 4
to implement
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning
process to meet curriculum
requirements and varied
teaching contexts
4. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Personal notes of teachers Quality 4 4
collegial on LACs/FGDs/meetings
discussions that with proof of attendance
use teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
learner feedback sessions on use of teacher 4 4
to enrich teaching and learner feedback to
practice. enrich teaching practice with Efficiency
proof of attendance
3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 3 3

Education developed, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services organized and inter-observer agreement
used appropriate form about using appropriate
teaching and teaching and learning
learning resources, including ICT
resources, Examples:
including ICT, to  Activity sheets/task
address learning sheets/work sheets Efficiency
goals.  PowerPoint presentations
 Video clips
 Module
 SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials
 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs 4 4
with appropriate instructional
materials appended
3. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

Basic 4. 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 3 3

Education Asses selected, (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services sment organized and inter-observer agreement
and used diagnostic, form about using diagnostic,
Report formative and formative and summative
ing summative assessment strategies
assessment 2. Prepared lesson 3 3
strategies plans/modified DLLs
consistent with highlighting appropriate use
curriculum of formative assessment
requirements. strategies
3. Developed diagnostic tests: 3 3
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer sheets
4. Developed summative tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by 3 3
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer sheets
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

5. Developed performance Efficiency 3 3

tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample accomplished
rubrics
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of a learner’s Quality 4 4
Education evaluated learner written work with summary of
Services progress and results and with signature of
achievement using parents
learner attainment 2. Formative/summative
data. assessment tools with TOS
and frequency of errors with Efficiency 4 4
identified least mastered
skills
3. Class records/grading
sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
showing index of mastery
Timeliness 4 4
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

Basic 12. 1. At least 3 samples of Quality 4 4

Education Communicated corrected test papers of the
Services promptly and same 3 learners in the same
clearly the learning area with parents’ or
learners’ needs, guardians’ signature and
progress and date of receipt
achievement to
2. Minutes of PTA meetings or
key stakeholders,
Parent-Teacher conferences
including Efficiency 4 4
parents/guardians. in all quarters with proof of
parent’s/guardian’s
attendance
3. Report cards with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
4. Communication with
parents/guardians using
various modalities
Timeliness 4 4
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing
learner needs, progress and
achievement submitted to
other stakeholders

Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition or Quality 4 4

Education Factor various related Participation
Services works/activities 2. Certificate of Training
that contribute to 3. Certificate of Speakership
the teaching- 4. Committee involvement
learning process. 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular
activities
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

6. Book or Journal Efficiency 4 4

Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorship
7. Coordinatorship/Chairperson
ship
8. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers
10. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness

LIRA M. LIBANAN SUSANA M. EVARDONE

Rater Ratee Approving Authority