Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Engineering Department
University of Bahrain
The report discusses the tensile strength of mild steel and aluminum which is part of mechanical
properties of material and compare their results to stand on which has higher properties in term
of strength. The experiment used the universal testing machine to perform the test, the data
produced, plotted in the form of stress strain curve, subsequently tensile strength, yield
strength, modulus of elasticity, percentage elongation been found and calculated. The
mechanical properties of the specimens are being compared to show the contrast between
the two. From this experiment, it can be seen that mild steel has higher tensile properties than
that for the aluminum. This explains the wide applications of mild steel in many industries and
engineering applications that require high strength.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................ii
LIST OF FIGURE..................................................................................................................... iv
1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1
4 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................. 9
5 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 10
iii
LIST OF TABLE
LIST OF FIGURE
iv
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
One of the design requirement, in the engineering fields is the strength of material selected
for the application. Studying the mechanical properties of the different materials, help to
segregate the different material in term of strength, ductility, hardness, toughness and other
characteristic.
To explore the mechanical properties of metals, it needs material testing and experiment. The
tensile strength test experiment is one of them, and it is usually carried out to stand on the
tensile strength, yield strength, percentage elongation, ultimate tensile strength (necking),
modulus of elasticity, ductility, resilience, and toughness of the material.
1.3 Scope
The scope of experiment is to explore the mechanical properties of two different specimens
under a tensile test. The materials to be investigated are mild steel and aluminum.
By carrying out the test and then by plotting curve, we can determine, the mechanical
characteristics of both specimens like modulus of elasticity, yield strength, percentage
elongation, and ultimate strength, fracture point, and others characteristic. We also, going
to do some comparison between the two. In term tensile properties.
It should be noted that, the test will be carried in accordance to the “ASTM standard E8 &
E8M – Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials”. [1, p.1]
2 THEORY AND ANALYSIS
Source: “Tensile Testing, Second Edition (#05106G) - Chapter 1- Introduction to Tensile Testing”
https://www.asminternational.org/documents/10192/3465262/05105G_Chapter_1.pdf/e13396e8-a327-490a-
a414-9bd1d2bc2bb8
2
2.3 Materials Of Specimen
We will use mild steel and aluminum specimen in the experiment, in accordance to the ASTM
standard, the dimensions of the specimen of tensile test is as follow:
3
Deformation, the specimen retains its shape but not the size. Permanent deformation
or non-recoverable deformation occur. [2, p.170]
From ultimate tensile strength till failure point is called Non- Uniform Plastic
Deformation, the specimen starts Necking, which means, the material goes through
strain softening process, it will continue till failure. [2, p.170]
2.5.1 Stress:
The engineering stress () used in this stress-strain curve is the average longitudinal stress in
the tensile specimen. It is obtained by dividing the load (P) by the original area of the cross
section of the specimen (Ao): [3, p.22]
𝑃
𝜎=
𝐴𝑜
2.5.2 Strain:
The strain, () used for the engineering stress strain curve is the average linear strain, which is
obtained by dividing the elongation of the gage length of the specimen (L) by its original
length (Lo): [3, p.22]
∆𝑙 𝑙 − 𝑙𝑜
𝜖= =
𝑙𝑜 𝑙𝑜
𝜎
𝐸=
𝜀
4
3 EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
b) The machine vices were adjusted to fit the specimen, and fix the extensometers on the
reduced sections of the gage specimen. To read any change in length.
c) Ensure that the computer reader is on, and it is set to deal with the selected specimen on
the software, i.e. with mild steel or aluminum.
d) Adjust reader to zeroing on universal tensile machine load cell, and make sure to set it, to
measure only the tensile load on each specimen inserted.
e) Ensure the data will be recorded and properly save, so it can be retrieved for calculation
and plotting of the graphs.
3.2 Result
350
300
250
200
Stress (MPa)
150
100
50
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4
-50
Strain (mm/mm)
5
Table 2. Mild Steel Specimen Data
Time (s) Extension (mm) Load (N) Stress (Mpa) Strain (mm/mm)
0 0 0.9 0.1 0.00
10 0.83 4694.3 238.9 0.01
20 1.67 4831.4 245.9 0.02
30 2.5 4781.1 243.3 0.03
40 3.33 4918.8 250.3 0.04
50 4.17 4926.6 250.7 0.05
60 5 5257.1 267.5 0.06
70 5.83 5437.0 276.7 0.07
80 6.66 5575.9 283.8 0.08
81 6.75 5584.2 284.2 0.08
81.1 6.76 5584.0 284.2 0.08
81.2 6.77 5591.6 284.6 0.09
81.3 6.77 5588.0 284.4 0.09
100 8.33 5775.2 293.9 0.10
110 9.16 5847.5 297.6 0.12
120 10 5911.0 300.8 0.13
130 10.83 5965.4 303.6 0.14
140 11.67 6010.5 305.9 0.15
150 12.5 6042.6 307.5 0.16
160 13.33 6072.3 309.0 0.17
170 14.16 6092.9 310.1 0.18
180 15 6113.2 311.1 0.19
190 15.83 6129.7 311.9 0.20
200 16.67 6140.4 312.5 0.21
210 17.5 6146.4 312.8 0.22
220 18.33 6148.1 312.9 0.23
230 19.16 6149.2 312.9 0.24
240 20 6147.2 312.8 0.25
250 20.83 6142.2 312.6 0.26
260 21.66 6130.6 312.0 0.27
270 22.5 6120.4 311.5 0.28
280 23.33 6099.7 310.4 0.29
290 24.16 6050.8 307.9 0.30
300 25 5940.2 302.3 0.31
310 25.83 5675.3 288.8 0.32
320 26.67 4725.5 240.5 0.33
322.2 26.84 358.0 18.2 0.34
322.2 26.85 79.0 4.0 0.34
322.2 26.85 -8.0 -0.4 0.34
6
3.2.2 Aluminum Result
The result of the Aluminum specimen can be seen in Table 3, and figure 5 as follow:
140
120
100
80
Stress (MPa)
60
40
20
0
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09
-20
-40
Strain (mm/mm)
7
Table 4. Comparison Between Mild Steel And Aluminum
350
300
250
200
Stress (MPa)
150
100
50
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4
-50
Strain (mm/mm)
Figure 6. Comparison Of Tensile Strength Between Mild Steel & Aluminum Specimens
The Stress Strain graph shows that, the mild steel is more robust since the ultimate tensile
strength is nearly double of that for the aluminum. It is also more ductile than aluminum since
the break point of mild steel is twice that of the aluminum, It can absorb more energy than
aluminum since the area under curve of the mild steel is nearly eight times the size of aluminum
curve. The aluminum sample experience less ductility deformation since the mild steel has
higher percentage of elongation. The mild steel has higher fracture point than that for the
aluminum.
In design selection of material there are number of factors dictate that selection such as cost,
workability, forming, maintenance, life span, and others characteristic. But when it comes to
strength. we can safely conclude that, the mild steel has higher tensile proprieties than
aluminum, making it a favorite selection of material when strength is require.
9
5 REFERENCES
[1] Designation: E 8/E 8M – 08, Standard, Test Methods For Tension Testing of
Metallic Materials. USA Publisher ASM international.
[2] William D. Callister, Jr. and David G. Rethwisch, Materials Science and
Engineering- An Introduction, 9th ed. USA: publisher Wiley, October 2013.
[3] J.R. Davis, Tensile Testing. Second Edition. Edited by Davis & Associates,
publisher ASM International.
[4] Barry G, and James Gere, Mechanics of Materials, 9th ed. USA: publisher
Cencagey, 2013.
10